Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

United States v. Young, 347 F. Supp. 3d 747

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

WRIT OF EXECUTION FORM

4-801A

[1-065.1]

STATE OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY

No.

Plaintiff

v.

Defendant

WRIT OF EXECUTION

THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO to the sheriff or a full-time salaried deputy sheriff of any New Mexico county:

Judgment having been entered in this action, you are ordered to levy against property of

at in your county, the

sum of $ (which is the judgment and costs to date) plus interest at the rate of

% per year from the day of (date of judgment), and

your fees thereon, and return this writ to me within sixty (60) days.

Judge or clerk

(This form may also be issued
as a second or subsequent writ.)

RETURN

I certify that I carried out this writ of execution, as follows:

(check appropriate box or boxes and fill in blanks)

The writ was served on judgment debtor on and

full payment was made

partial payment was made in the amount of

No non-exempt property of judgment debtor was found on which levy could be made.

Property seized:

I levied upon the following real property

Personal property was taken into custody on A

written inventory is attached.

Judgment debtor provided bond to retain possession. A copy of the bond is attached.

Date of return:

SHERIFF OF

COUNTY, State of New Mexico

By

Deputy or other authorized person

USE NOTE

The sheriff is obligated by law to make timely return

Only non-exempt property may be seized.

The sheriff may not seize any personal clothing, furniture or
books or any jewelry unless the total value of all jewelry
exceeds $2500.

[Effective July 1, 1992; January 1, 1996.]

Enter text

What United States v. Young, 347 F. Supp. 3d 747 Represents

United States v. Young, 347 F. Supp. 3d 747 is a federal district-court opinion reported at that citation. This page treats the decision as a legal resource: it explains the types of information contained in the opinion, how litigators and researchers typically use such cited authority, and practical considerations for citing, filing, and storing the opinion or related electronic records in U.S. proceedings. Because factual holdings and precedential effect vary by court and subsequent history, practitioners should confirm the case’s current status before relying on it in briefs or motions.

Why This Opinion May Matter to Your Matter

The opinion can supply controlling factual context, legal analysis, or persuasive reasoning in federal litigation; it also illustrates how a district court applied statutory or constitutional principles in a particular procedural posture.

Why This Opinion May Matter to Your Matter

Who Typically Consults This Opinion

Practitioners, researchers, and compliance teams reference a district-court opinion when preparing briefs, drafting motions, or advising clients on likely outcomes.

  • Litigators and appellate counsel who need supporting authority for legal arguments in federal courts.
  • In-house counsel and compliance officers assessing regulatory risk and internal policies.
  • Legal researchers, clerks, and academics citing precedent or tracing doctrinal development.

Confirm the case’s subsequent history and jurisdictional weight before treating it as precedent; district opinions are persuasive unless adopted by higher courts.

Parts of the Opinion to Review First

Focus your reading on discrete opinion elements to extract usable points for briefing, exhibits, or client memos.

Procedural History

Summarizes prior proceedings, motions, and rulings that frame the court’s decision and show what was preserved for appeal.

Factual Background

Concise statement of key facts the court found material; use these facts to test fit with your client’s circumstances.

Legal Issue

Clear articulation of the question presented; aligns the opinion to the specific legal point you plan to cite.

Holding

The court’s dispositive conclusion on the issue; note narrow language and any limiting phrases.

Reasoning

Statutory interpretation, policy analysis, or precedent reliance that supports the holding — cite specific doctrinal points.

Disposition

The final order or judgment and any instructions for remand, relief, or further proceedings.

Essential Citation and Document Details

Case Citation: United States v. Young, 347 F. Supp. 3d 747
Court: Federal district court
Decision Date: Date as shown on opinion
Parties: Plaintiff(s) and defendant(s)
Docket Number: Court docket identifier
Opinion Pages: Page range in reporter

How to Extract and Use Key Points from the Opinion

Follow a short sequence to capture legal value and prepare citation-ready excerpts for filings or memos.

  • 01
    Read Core Sections: Scan procedural history, facts, issue, and holding first.
  • 02
    Isolate Quotable Language: Select precise statutory or doctrinal language for quotation and pin citation.
  • 03
    Check Subsequent History: Confirm no reversal or superseding authority affects reliance.
  • 04
    Prepare a Citation: Use full reporter cite and short-form cite per local rules.

Setting Up an eFiling or eDiscovery Workflow

Configure upload, authentication, and retention settings so the opinion and related submissions meet court and recordkeeping expectations.

Field Configuration
Upload PDF/A format with searchable OCR
Signature ESIGN-compliant eSignature with audit trail
Authentication Email link or SMS code for signer verification
Retention Retain PDF + audit log per rules

Where to File or Submit Materials Referring to the Opinion

Different filings and service processes require routing to specific court or agency systems; use the court’s e-filing portal when available.

  • Court Filing: Submit via the court’s CM/ECF e-filing system when required.
  • Clerk Submission: Deliver supporting exhibits per local rules for sealed or restricted material.
  • Opposing Counsel: Serve filings and attached opinions according to FRCP service rules or local equivalents.
  • Agency Filings: Send copies to administrative agencies per their e-submission requirements.

Digital Signing and eSubmission: Platform Requirements

Ensure the signing and submission platform supports required file types, signer authentication, and an exportable audit trail before use.

  • File Formats: PDF, PDF/A, DOCX supported
  • Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace
  • Authentication: Email, SMS, or advanced methods

Typical Timelines and Processing Expectations

Allow time for verification, clerk processing, and service; appellate and procedural deadlines vary by rule and jurisdiction.

Notice of Appeal Deadline:

Typically 30 days in many federal civil matters

E-Filing Processing:

Clerk entry and docketing often take 1–3 business days

Certificate of Service:

Attach correct service proof when filing; timelines affect service validity

Record Requests:

Request certified transcripts or full docket early; preparation can take weeks

Production Response:

Meet discovery production windows under local rules

Common Mistakes When Relying on a District Opinion

  • Failing to check subsequent appellate history or Shepardize the decision before citation.
  • Quoting dicta as controlling law without confirming precedential value within that circuit.
  • Relying on fact patterns that materially differ from your client’s circumstances when analogizing.
  • Submitting unsigned or redacted attachments that prevent the clerk from confirming the document’s authenticity.

Risks of Incorrect Citation or Submission

Sanctions Risk: Possible court sanctions
Motion Denial: Claims may be rejected
Waiver: Issues may be forfeited
Evidentiary Loss: Attachment authentication failure
Ethics Exposure: Misleading citation concerns
Document Rejection: Noncompliant e-file refused

Differences Among Court Document Types You May Encounter

Courts issue several document types; know each type’s precedential weight and how it should be cited in filings.

Precedent Type Precedential Citation Use
Published Opinion full cite
Memorandum Opinion varies cite sparingly
Order case-specific
Judgment final disposition

eSignature Vendor Pricing and Feature Snapshot for Case Documents

Comparing common vendor starting prices and feature availability can inform platform selection for signing and storing court-related documents.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor
Bulk Send Yes — Business Premium Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes (BAA available) Yes Yes No No

Frequently Asked Questions and Practical Answers

Common practitioner questions about using, citing, and submitting this opinion, with concise guidance for routine problems.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users