Case Caption
Complete caption with court name, docket number, and party names so the order is docketable and unambiguous.
An agreed order provides a clear, enforceable modification of existing deadlines while reflecting the parties mutual consent. It reduces the risk of sanctions or default by documenting the court-approved schedule change.
Parties to litigation, their counsel, and court clerks commonly prepare and submit agreed orders to modify schedules or deadlines.
After entry, the court-signed order governs timetable changes; parties must follow the new dates and circulate certified copies to affected recipients.
Lead counsel for each party usually signs the stipulation supporting the proposed order and certifies client authorization. Counsel may also file the joint notice and proposed order with the court and confirm agreed dates to opposing counsel.
The presiding judge or magistrate formally signs the Agreed Order Granting Extension of Time to make it effective. The judge may accept, modify, or deny the parties requested extension based on case management needs and applicable court rules.
Complete caption with court name, docket number, and party names so the order is docketable and unambiguous.
A short statement describing the parties agreement, the reason for the extension, and any operative facts supporting the request.
Clear new deadline language that replaces the prior date and specifies the exact event or filing being extended.
Signature blocks for counsel or parties and a judge signature line for entry; include dates adjacent to signatures.
Statement of how the order will be served and to whom, and an instruction to the clerk to enter the order on the docket.
Comply with local rules on margins, page numbering, line spacing, and any required proposed order cover sheet.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Case Caption | Auto-populate from case-level metadata |
| Deadline Fields | Use date pickers with MM/DD/YYYY format validation |
| Signature Blocks | Require signer name, role, email, and signature timestamp |
| Submission Trigger | Route to counsel for approval before eFiling |
Confirm your platform meets court and security requirements before relying on e-signatures for court submissions.
Many courts accept electronically signed proposed orders if the submission complies with local eFiling rules; verify formatting, signature, and authentication requirements with the clerk prior to filing.
| Document Type | Agreed Order | Motion for Extension |
|---|---|---|
| Consent Required | ||
| Judge Approval | ||
| Service Required | ||
| Typical Use | jointly change schedule | unilateral request for relief |
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Check local rules for motion filing windows and whether extensions affect those dates
Extensions to discovery require coordinated scheduling to avoid conflicts
Judge may reset hearings; confirm courtroom availability before proposing a new date
Extensions should not inadvertently affect appeal deadlines without counsel review
Confirm that service of the entered order complies with local rule timing requirements
Parties confirm new dates and agree on language for the proposed order
Counsel drafts and circulates the proposed order for signature
File the stipulation and proposed order via eFiling or clerk's office
Judge signs, clerk enters the order, and the new deadline becomes binding
Parties agreed to extend discovery by 30 days to complete depositions
A defendant requested additional time to respond to written discovery due to counsel illness