AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
Description of the Amendment The proposed amendment to the Association's Articles of Incorporation (the "Amendment") is set forth
in Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement. The following description of the Amendment is a summary only, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Exhibit.
The Amendment would make dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock noncumulative rather than
cumulative. As a result, upon the effectiveness of the Amendment, holders of shares of Series A Preferred
Stock would be entitled to receive dividends only as, if and when declared by the Board of Directors of the
Association out of funds legally available therefor. Thus, in contrast to the present terms of the Series A
Preferred Stock, such holders would have no right to receive dividends in respect of any dividend period, and
the Association would have no obligation to pay dividends that formerly accrued for such periods.
For the Amendment to become effective, it must be approved by the California Savings and Loan
Commissioner (the "California Commissioner") and the Office of Thrift Supervision (the "OTS") and must be
filed with the California Secretary of State. On March 5 and April 12, 1990, the Association filed applications
regarding the Amendment and the post-Amendment Series A Preferred Stock with the OTS and the California
Commissioner, respectively. Although the Association has not received any communication from these
agencies regarding the status of the applications, the Association believes that regulatory approval for the
Amendment will be obtained as necessary. Nonetheless, there can be no assurance that such regulatory
approvals will be obtained.
Principal Reasons for the Amendment
The purpose of the Amendment is to cause the Series A Preferred Stock to be includable as core capital
and tangible capital for regulatory capital compliance purposes.
Primarily as a result of the Association's $591.1 million net loss for the year ended December 31, 1989,
the Association at December 31, 1989 failed to meet each of the three capital standards under FIRREA. Under
FIRREA and the capital regulations promulgated by the OTS thereunder (the "Capital Regulations"), the
Association is required to maintain (i) "tangible capital" equal to at least 1.5% of adjusted total asset s, (ii)
"core capital" equal to at least 3.0% of adjusted total assets and (iii) "total capital" initiall y equal to 6.4%,
increasing to 8.0% on December 31, 1992, of total risk-weighted assets (the "risk-based capital requirement").
The 1989 net loss primarily resulted from (i) increased credit deterioration in the Association's portfolio
of noninvestment-grade corporate debt securities (i.e., debt securities not rated in one of the top four rating
categories by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization) and mandatorily redeemabl e preferred
stock (together, "corporate debt securities"), as reflected by an increase in the allowance for credit losses of
$465.6 million; (ii) the substantial decline in the high-yield securities market, as reflected in lowe r-of-cost-or-
market (“LOCOM”) adjustments of $389.5 million; (iii) a net loss on real estate operations of $61.6 million,
primarily reflecting the weakening of the Southern California office lease market; and (iv) a decrease in ne t
interest income from 1988 levels of $37.5 million, primarily reflecting the increased cost of hinds during the
first half of 1989 and a substantial increase in nonaccrual assets.
The Association's tangible capital and core capital were equal to total stockholders' equity at December
3 1, 1989, which was $77.6 million. The Association's ratios of stockholders' equity, tangible capital and core
capital to adjusted total assets at that date were 0.8%, resulting in shortfalls of $61.2 million from the 1.5%
minimum tangible capital requirement of $138.8 million and $200.0 million from the 3.0% minimum core
capital requirement of $277.6 million.
The Association's total capital aggregated $123.8 million at December 31, 1989, resulting in a $365.5
million shortfall from the current requirement of 6.4% of total risk-weighted assets, or $489.3 million. See
Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Association's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1989 (the "1989 10-K") for additional regulatory capital information, including
reconciliation at Der-ember 31, 1989 of stockholders' equity (calculated in accordance with generally acce pted
accounting principles (" GAAP") to tangible capital and core capital and of core capital to total capita l.
Any savings association not in compliance with the Capital Regulations is required to submit a capital
restoration plan ("capital plan"), acceptable to the Director of the OTS (the "DOTS"). A noncomplying savings
association is also subject to other restrictions, including a prohibition on accepting brokered deposits
(including renewals or rollovers) in the absence of a waiver. Ile DOTS may also treat a failure to maintain
required capital as an unsafe and unsound practice, which could constitute grounds for termination by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") of deposit insurance for deposits received by the institution
engaged in the unsafe and unsound practice (existing deposits, less subsequent withdrawals, remain insured for
between six months and two years). Prior to terminating insurance, the FDIC may temporarily suspend deposit
insurance for any savings association that has no tangible capital (deposits in existence on the date of the
temporary order, less subsequent withdrawals, remain insured). In addition, the OTS has announced that it
intends to propose a regulation that would provide for the OTS takeover of any savings institution when its
tangible capital falls below 1% of assets. Finally, a conservator or receiver may be appointed for an association
if, among other things, (i) such association fails to maintain required capital, (ii) such association has its c apital
plan rejected by the OTS, (iii) such association fails to remain in compliance with an OTS approved capi tal
plan or (iv) the DOTS determines that such association (A) is in an unsafe or unsound condition to transact
business, including having substantially insufficient capital or otherwise, or (B) has incurred or is likely to
incur losses that will deplete all or substantially all of its capital and there is no reasonable prospect for the
savings association's capital to be replenished without federal assistance. In the event of a receivership or
conservatorship, stockholders would lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Association. The
DOTS may also require a savings association to meet more stringent capital standards than those under the
Capital Regulations on a case-by-case basis.
The Association submitted its 1990 Business and Capital Plan (such plan, as revised, being the "Plan")
to the OTS on January 8, 1990. On March 6, 1990, the Association, in response to certain regulatory
suggestions and to reflect certain developments since the date the Plan was originally filed, filed a revi sed Plan
with the OTS. The Plan is founded on a business strategy that contemplates a phased divestiture of the
Association's corporate debt securities portfolio through open market sales and redemptions that will be
completed by the end of the five-year divestiture period required under FIRREA. The Plan contemplates such
divestiture shall be consummated at the carrying value of such securities at February 28, 1990 (which value in
the aggregate was equal to market value at such date) and, therefore, no gain or loss will be recognized by the
Association. In addition, it assumes that the Association's equity securities portfolio is substantially diveste d
within the next three years. The revised Plan indicates that the Association would achieve capital compl iance
with all capital requirements by the first quarter of 1994.
The foregoing timetables represented the Association's best estimate, based on information available to
it and market conditions at that time, of the time period during which it could dispose of such portfolios
without adversely impacting the high-yield market and, therefore, the proceeds to be received by the
Association from such disposition. Management believes that the disposition of such portfolios in the open
market over a shorter period of time may adversely impact the Association's ability to achieve capita l
compliance by reducing substantially its proceeds from such disposition. Although disposition over the five-
year time frame may enable the Association to participate in any recovery from the current depressed market
price levels for high-yield debt securities, it does lengthen the Association's exposure to future LOCOM
adjustments and credit risk.
Although the Association presented the Plan to the OTS because it involved the fewest regulatory
exceptions or waivers and the least complexity in dealing with financial markets, the Association bel ieves that
an alternative strategy, to which it is presently devoting substantial resources, may constitute a preferable
means of achieving full compliance with the capital requirements. This alternative strategy would i nvolve the
one-time divestiture of substantially all of the Association's corporate debt securities portfolio in a structured
financing transaction that the Association might help finance. The Association has also discussed with its
regulators variations on the Plan and the structured financing alternative. The Association has presented this
alternative in considerable detail to the OTS and the FDIC, and is continuing discussions with them. The
alternative strategy would require numerous regulatory waivers, exemptions and approvals. Consummation of
a one-time divestiture transaction on the terms presently contemplated would likely carry negative im plications
for the Association's net interest income in the periods immediately following such transaction, due to the
long-term nature of the Association's high-cost liabilities, and would preclude the Association from being in
compliance with the qualified thrift lender test, which would result in certain adverse consequences to the
Association's ability to borrow to meet future liquidity needs. Under either disposition strategy, it will be
necessary during most of 1990 to operate under the phased divestiture model due to the time required to obtain
regulatory waivers and approvals and to market a structured financing transaction to outside investors.
As indicated in the Plan, the Association's primary future business will be investment in residential
mortgages, both through direct lending and through investment in mortgage-backed securities. The Association
anticipates that such activities would be primarily funded with (i) deposits gathered through its branch system
and telemarketing operations and (ii) net proceeds from sales of its corporate debt and equity securities and
real estate.
In addition to disposing of the corporate debt securities portfolio, equity investments and other high
risk-weight assets, the Plan also contains such other capital compliance steps as (i) reducing the Association's
overall asset size, (ii) increasing capital by realizing gains on disposition of equity securities, (iii) reduci ng
general and administrative expenses, and (iv) exchanging existing convertible subordinated debt for equity.
While the timely filing of the Plan does not place the Association in compliance with the OTS capit al
standards, it does mean that the Association is in compliance with FERREA's requirements to file a capi tal
plan, and, therefore, not currently subject to certain enforcement sanctions solely for failure to meet the
statutory capital standards. A savings association that has been granted an exemption and is operating in
compliance with an approved capital plan is also not in compliance with the statutory capital require ments. So
long as it complies with its plan, however, the association is treated as if it were in compliance with such
standards for the purposes only of not imposing penalties and other sanctions for failing to meet such
standards. There is, however, no limit on the OTS's authority to take any appropriate action with respect to any
unsafe or unsound practice or condition of the Association, other than the failure to comply with the statutory
capital standards.
There can be no assurance that the OTS will approve the Plan. If the Plan (or the Plan's request for
capital exemption or exception) is not approved by the OTS, the Association will be subject to a variety of
supervisory and enforcement sanctions, including being prohibited from increasing its assets or making any
capital distributions and being subject to any other orders (such as orders to increase capital) or restrictions
(such as restrictions on lending, investments, operational expenditures, new deposits and/or interest rates paid
on deposits) imposed by the OTS in its notice of disapproval or otherwise. Many of these restrictions already
apply to the Association.
By approving a plan, exemption or exception, the DOTS does not approve contemplated actions or
transactions for which separate applications, notices or filings are required. Accordingly, even if the OTS were
to approve the Plan, the Association would still be required to obtain separate approvals for aspects of such
Plan requiring separate approval, such as continuing to accept brokered deposits and the alternative structured
disposition transaction.
Although the Association believes that the Plan affords a feasible means for it to achieve capital
compliance, there can be no assurance that the Plan will be accepted by the OTS, that it will be acce pted
without substantial modifications and/or operating restrictions, or that, even if accepted, the Association wil l
be able to comply with the provisions of the Plan. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that any of the
assumptions in the Plan will occur. Many of the assumptions underlying the Plan, e.g., the amount of the gains
ultimately to be realized on disposition of the Association's equity and equity equivalent securities portfol io,
are subject to external events not within the control of the Association, and the failure of such assumptions to
occur as projected may have a material adverse effect on the Association's ability to comply with the Pla n or to
otherwise achieve capital compliance. The consequences for failure to have the Plan accepted or to compl y
with the Plan are severe, and such nonacceptance and noncompliance, as well as the failure of some or all of
the Plan's assumptions to occur, would likely have a significant adverse impact on the Association's business
and financial position.The high-yield securities market continued to decline during the first two months of 1990. During the
two month period ended February 28, 1990, the Association recorded additional net losses of approximately
$198 million, resulting primarily from LOCOM adjustments aggregating $210.6 million. These losses resulted
in a stockholders' deficit of $120.7 million at such date, thereby rendering the Association insolvent under
GAAP. Under OTS Regulatory Bulletin 3a-1, a savings association that has become insolvent between the date
of filing of a capital plan and the date of its approval or rejection by the OTS is prohibited from making any
new loans or investments without the prior approval of the OTS District Director. Insolvency is one of the
grounds in which the DOTS can appoint a conservator or receiver for a state-chartered association such as the
Association. In February 1990, the Association voluntarily limited its lending activity to residential loans not
exceeding $500,000 per loan. Such restriction, however, would likely have been required under the loans-to-
one-borrower rules and Regulatory Bulletin 3 a-1. Shortly thereafter, the Association filed an application with
the OTS seeking higher lending limits. By a letter dated March 30, 1990, the OTS responded by granting the
Association authority to (i) originate or purchase new loans or investments not to exceed $500,000 in the
aggregate to any one borrower that carry a risk weight of 50% or less under the risk-based capital regulations
and (ii) grow to the extent of net interest credited, effective March 31, 1990.
The Association’s tangible capital at February 28,1990 was a deficit of $120.7 million, resulting in a
$246.8 million shortfall from the 1.5% minimum tangible capital requirement of $126.1 million. The
Association’s core capital shortfall at that date amounted to $372.9 million from the 3% minimum core capit al
requirement of $252.2 million. If the Association does not realize sufficient income from gains on sales of
assets, and without a significant recovery in market price levels for corporate debt securities from those
existing at February 28,1990, the Association will continue to be out of compliance with a tangible, core and
risk-based capital requirements, and could be placed in conservatorship of receivership by the OTS.
For a further description of applicable capital requirements, see “Item 1. Business-Regulation-Capital
Regulations” and Note 2 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, both in the 1989 10-K
Pursuant to regulations promulgated by the OTS, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock may be included as
tangible capital and as core capital. While cumulative preferred stock, such as Series A Preferred Stock, ma y
be included as a risk-based capital, it generally may not be included as tangible capital or core capi tal. As of
December 31,1989, the Association included the Series A Preferred Stock as core capital and as tangible
capital on the basis of the irrevocable proxies described below. However, the Association has determined that
it should seek a formal amendment to the Series A Preferred Stock to make dividends on such preferred stock
non-cumulative in order to ensure that it may continue to include the Series A Preferred Stock in its core and
tangible capital. If the Association did not include the Series A Preferred Stock in its core and tangible capita l
at December 31, 1989, these amounts would have been decreased by approximately $8.5 million, which would
have resulted in tangible and core capital of $69.1 million (0.7% of adjusted total assets) and a corresponding
increase in tangible and core capital shortfall.
Because the Association has been including the Series A Preferred Stock in tangible and care capital,
neither the Amendment nor the Spiegel proxies described below were included as part of the plan, nor were
they required by the OTS Regional Office in San Francisco. Enactment of the amendment does not materially
improve the Association’s compliance with its required capital standards. Such compliance depends on
successful consummation of the Plan, as described above. The Association has already commenced
implementation of several steps in the plan, including selling approximately $575 million in high-yield
corporate debt securities between August 1989 and February 1990, and reducing significantly general expenses
in the fourth quarter of 1990.
Effects of the AmendmentAt the time the Amendment becomes effective, each share of Series A Preferred Stock then held by a
stockholder will automatically become non cumulative. Stockholders need not exchange their current Series A
Preferred Stock certificates, and such certificates shall represent the same number of shares of non cumulative
Series A Preferred Stock, and all rights, privileges and preferences attendant thereto.
After the Amendment becomes effective, holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will have no right to
dividends not declared or paid, as they do presently. However, the dividend rate on the Series A Preferred
Stock ($.01 per share per annum) is nominal. Moreover, as described in the Association's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated November 20, 1989, the OTS has prohibited the Association from paying any dividends or
capital distributions without the prior approval of the OTS. The Association has complied with such
restrictions and it is highly unlikely that the Association will be permitted in the future to pay any dividends i n
respect of either its Common Stock or Series A Preferred Stock until the OTS approves the Plan and the
Association achieves compliance with all applicable capital standards, as to the likelihood a nd timing of which
there can be no assurance. Furthermore, the Association is also prohibited under indentures in respect of
certain of its indebtedness from paying any dividends or capital distributions due to the extent of its net loss
during the past year.
There were no dividends in respect of the Series A Preferred Stock that had accrued and were unpaid at
the date of this Proxy Statement. Consistent with the OTS restriction on dividends and other stockholder
distributions described above, the Board of Directors voted in March 1990 not to declare the 1990 annual
dividend on the Series A Preferred. The last Series A Preferred Stock dividend was paid on May 1, 1989.
The Association has filed an amendment to its listing application in respect of the Series A Preferred
Stock with the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") and the Pacific Stock Exchange (the "PSE") so that
such stock may continue to be listed on the NYSE and the PSE. Although the Association believes that such
amendments to the listing applications will be approved, in the event that the Series A Preferred Stock does not
continue to be listed on the NYSE and the PSE, the Association intends to have the Series A Preferred Stock
included for quotation in the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations System.
Enactment of the Amendment Assured
Approval of the Amendment will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the number of votes that
may be cast by the outstanding shares of Common Stock and the Series A Preferred Stock entitled to be cast at
the Annual Meeting and voting together as a class (each share of Series A Preferred Stock has ten votes, and
each share of Common Stock has one vote on matters coming before stockholders of the Association).
Approval of the Amendment will also require the separate approval of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Series A Preferred Stock entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Thomas Spiegel, former Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Association, Abraham Spiegel, current Chairman of the Board, and
Rita Spiegel, daughter of Abraham Spiegel and sister of Thomas Spiegel, have granted to the Association
irrevocable proxies (the "Spiegel Proxies") authorizing certain officers of the Association to vote the shares
represented by such proxies (2,841,549 shares of Common Stock and 6,330,523 Series A Preferred Stock,
representing 63.1% of the number of votes that may be cast by the Common Stock and the Series A Preferred
Stock, voting together as a class, and 74.7% of the shares of the Series A Preferred Stock outstanding at the
Record Date) in favor of the Amendment, thereby assuring its enactment without any other votes being cast in
favor of the Amendment. It should be noted that the personal interests of the Spiegel family, who own 89.1%
of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock presently outstanding, would be affected by the approval of the
Amendment; nonetheless they have, as noted above, granted the Spiegel Proxies in favor of the Amendment so
that the Series A Preferred Stock may continue to be included in computing the Association's core and tangible
capital.
The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote "FOR" the proposed Amendment.
EXHIBIT A
AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
COLUMBIA SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
Certificate of Determination of Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
Section 1. Dividends
(a) Non-Accrual of Dividends. The holders of outstanding Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to
receive out of any funds legally available therefor, dividends in cash at the rate of one cent ($0.01) per share
per annum, before any dividend is paid on Common shares. The right to such dividends on Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock shall not be cumulative, and no right shall accrue to holders of Series A Preferred
Stock by reason of the fact that dividends on said shares are not declared or paid in any prior year, nor shall
any undeclared or unpaid dividend bear or accrue interest.
(b) Payment of Dividends. When and as declared by the Board of Directors of this Corporation (the
"Board of Directors") and to the extent permitted by applicable law, dividends as provided in Section l(a) may
be payable annually on the first day of May of each year that any Series A Preferred Stock shall be
outstanding, to holders of record of Series A Preferred Stock as of the first business day of April of each year
or otherwise as the Board of Directors may from time to time determine.
(c) Other Dividends
(i) No dividend (other than dividends payable in the Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, of this
Corporation (the "Common Stock") or other distribution shall be paid, or declared and set apart for payment,
on the shares of the Common Stock, nor shall any shares of the Common Stock be purchased, redeemed or
otherwise acquired for value by this Corporation and no monies shall be paid into or set aside or made
available for a sinking fund for the purchase, redemption or acquisition thereof, at any time during which this
Corporation has failed to make an annual dividend payment to the extent permitted by Section l(b) of this
Certificate of Determination and until such dividend is fully paid or declared and set apart for payment.
(ii) Subject to the provisions of Section l(c)(i) of this Certificate of Determination, holders of Common
Stock and Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive such other dividends and distributions as may
be declared thereon by the Board of Directors from time to time out of assets or funds of this Corporation
legally available therefor.
Section 2. Liquidation
(a) Preference. In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of
the affairs of this Corporation, the assets of this Corporation available for distribution to its stockholders,
whether from capital, surplus or earnings, shall be distributed as follows: (i) first, there shall be distributed to
the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock then outstanding an amount equal to $1.00 per share plus all
dividends declared and unpaid thereon to the date payment is made available to such holders; (ii) second, there
shall be distributed to the holders of then outstanding Common Stock an amount per share of Common Stock
equal to (A) $1.00 multiplied by (B) a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the number of shares of Series
A Preferred Stock then outstanding, and the denominator of which shall be the number of shares of "Adjusted
Stock" then deemed to be outstanding (as determined pursuant to Section 4 of the Certificate of
Determination); and (iii) third, the remaining assets shall be distributed among the holders of outstanding
Common Stock, ratably per share of Common Stock outstanding or deemed to be outstanding (for the purposes
of determining amounts to be distributed to holders of the Series A Preferred Stock pursuant to this Section
2(a)(iii), the distribution shall be based upon the number of shares of Adjusted Stock then deemed to be
outstanding with each share of Adjusted Stock for purposes of this Section 2(a)(iii) constituting one share of
Common Stock which is "deemed to be outstanding").(b) Partial Payment. If upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of this Corporation,
the assets of this Corporation available for distribution to its stockholders shall be insufficient to pay to the
holders of Series A Preferred Stock the full amount to which they shall be entitled in accordance with Section
2(a)(i) of this Certificate of Determination, the holders of Series A Preferred Stock shall share ratably in the
assets of this Corporation available for distribution.
(c) Sale of Assets. For purposes of this Section 2, a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs
of this Corporation shall not be deemed to be occasioned by or to include this Corporation's sale of all or
substantially all of its assets or any consolidation or merger to this Association is a party .