MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
WATER QUALITY REVOLVING LOAN FUND PROGRAM
FINAL
FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2010
INTENDED USE PLAN
July 9, 2010
Prepared By
MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION
Martin O’Malley
Governor
Shari T. Wilson
Secretary
Anthony G. Brown
Lt. Governor
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D.
Deputy Secretary
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION
FINAL
Federal Fiscal Year 2010 Intended Use Plan
Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................1
A. Sources and Uses of Funds ............................................................................................................................... 3
B. Goals of the Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund (WQRLF or WQSRF) ............................................ 4
C. Project Selection and Fund Activities under the FFY 2010 Intended Use Plan (IUP) ....................................... 6
D. Project Scope of Work/Environmental Benefits - FFY 2010 IUP Projects ..........................................................7
E. Minority Business Enterprises/Women's Business Enterprises (M/WBE) Participation ..................................... 8
F. Assurances ......................................................................................................................................................... 8
G. Binding Commitments and Cash Draw Projections ............................................................................................ 8
H. Public Review of the Final FFY 2010 IUP............................................................................................................ 8
Table 1 - Project List and Sources/Uses of Funds
Appendix A:
Appendix B:
Appendix C:
Appendix D:
Appendix E:
Maryland WQSRF Final Project Priority List for FFY 2010 IUP
WQSRF Integrated Project Priority System (IPPS)
WQSRF Disadvantaged Community Criteria & Funding Allocation
Public Hearing Responsiveness Summary
Assistant Attorney General Certification
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION
FINAL
Federal Fiscal Year 2010 Intended Use Plan
Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Intended Use Plan (IUP) is the document that the Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration (MWQFA)
will submit to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to request the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY)
2010 Capitalization Grant under the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA), to be matched with 20% of State bond/general
funds, for use in the Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund (WQRLF or WQSRF). The Maryland WQSRF was
established pursuant to the Clean Water Act of 1987 and the Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration Act,
Title 9, Subtitle 16 of the Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, to provide below market interest rate
loans to local governments and eligible private entities for certain water quality capital projects.
The State of Maryland is committed to using the capitalization grant funds for which we are applying to provide
assistance to wastewater, nonpoint source, and other eligible green, water or energy efficiency improvements or
environmentally innovative (“Green”) projects that will proceed to construction and assist in furthering the water quality
objectives of the Clean Water Act, while broadening environmental benefits to the Chesapeake Bay.
During FFY 2010, Maryland will be making a grant application to receive $49,279,000 in Federal Capitalization Grant
to be matched with $9,855,800 (20%) in State funds. With this 2010 IUP, the MWQFA is requesting the federal (4%)
funds or $1,971,160 for WQSRF program administration. The highlights of the Final 2010 IUP are as follows:
SOURCES
USES
Capitalization Grant
State (Bond/Gen. Fund) Match (20%)
Est. Invest. Earnings/Repayments
$
$
$
Total
$
49,279,000 WQSRF Admin. Exp. (up to 4% of grant)
9,855,800 Capital Projects - Loans & Grants
83,000,000 Linked Deposit Program Bank Loans
142,134,800
$
$
$
1,971,160
140,163,640
-
$
142,134,800
Loan Terms:
Applicable to all WQSRF loans except loans through the Linked Deposit Program
(See Section B-2 below)
Current Interest Rate*
Standard Rate = 50% of Market Rate
Disadvantaged Community (DAC) Rate = 25% of Market
(Market Interest Rate is defined as the average of the Bond Buyer 11-Bond Index for the
month preceding the loan closing).
* MDE, by policy, can change the SRF loan interest rate at any time. Interest rates are
posted on the MWQFA web site.
Loan Term
Up to 20 Years
Loan Origination Fee
None
Administrative Fee
5% of the aggregate debt service divided by the number of administrative fee payments
over the life of the loan, and is collected annually. This amounts to approximately 0.50% (or
50 basis points) increase in the interest rate for a 20-year loan. The administrative fee is to
help meet program operating expenses. This is in addition to the any funds provided for
WQSRF program expenses from the Federal Capitalization Grant (up to 4% of cap. grant).
Table 1 shows the proposed list of projects for inclusion on the FFY 2010 IUP for WQSRF financial assistance. These
projects were selected from the Project Priority List based on: (1) The Integrated Project Priority System (IPPS)
ranking and (2) Readiness to proceed to construction by December 31, 2011. The IPPS provides higher priority to
WWTP upgrades for Biological and Enhanced Nutrient Removal (BNR/ENR) and Combined Sewer Overflow
Page 1
(CSO)/Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) rehabilitation projects, located in priority watersheds, that will help attain water
quality standards and/or help restore surface water and biological communities. Before loan execution, projects
identified in the IUP will undergo a detailed financial/credit analysis by the MWQFA.
Please note: Projects that are ranked within the fundable range (1-62), that are not ready to proceed to
construction by December 31, 2011, will be bypassed by other projects on the waiting list and PPL that are
able to proceed to construction and will meet MDE’s programmatic requirements. Waiting list and PPL
project applicants that are able to meet both requirements are encouraged to contact MDE to discuss
potential funding.
Page 2
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION
Federal Fiscal Year 2010 Intended Use Plan
Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund
A. Sources and Uses of Funds
A comprehensive summary of WQSRF Sources and Uses of funds are as follows:
As of 6/30/2010
Sources:
Thru 2009 IUP
Federal Capitalization Grants
Federal Stimulus Grant
State Match
Total Bond Proceeds
Investment Earnings (Thru FY 09)
Loan Principal Repayments (Thru FY 09)
Loan Interest Repayments (Thru FY 09)
Subtotal
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
651,823,624 a
94,784,600
130,373,000 b
213,360,882 c
131,048,504
438,758,784
180,067,827
1,840,217,221
$
$
$
$
49,279,000
9,855,800
-
$
59,134,800
$
$
$
$
$58,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
69,000,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
10,000,000
5,000,000
68,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000
98,000,000
$
1,909,217,221
$
157,134,800
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,272,686,770
149,328,418
180,553,641
10,634,580
120,224,875
116,684,452
11,902,094
2,000,000
12,412,454
658,322
23,000,000
1,909,217,221
Estimated Loan Principal (10)
Estimated Loan Interest Repayments (10)
Investment Earnings (10)
Estimated Loan Principal (11)
Estimated Loan Interest Repayments (11)
Investment Earnings (11)
Subtotal
Total Sources
Uses:
Loan Agreements Entered (6.30.09)
Projects on IUPs with loans pending as of June 30, 2009
Projects Stimulus on 08 IUP with loans & grants pending
Loan agreements including Stimulus (5.15.10)
Funds Transferred to Drinking Water SRF (98/99 IUPs)
Bond Principal Repaid
Bond Interest Expense
Bond Debt Service Reserve
Stimulus Administrative Expense
4% Administrative Expensed
4% Administrative Expense/Reserve
Allocated for Non-point Source Projects – Linked Deposit
Total Uses
a
b
2010 IUP
2009 IUP
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
140,163,640
11,000,000
4,000,000
1,971,160
157,134,800
Total awards through 2009 Capitalization Grant
Includes State General/Bond Fund match of $3.29 million for FFY 2009 IUP (anticipated July 2010)
Page 3
B. Goals of the Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund
1.
•
Long-Term Goals
Fund Perpetuity & Utilization - To utilize the total financial resources of the Fund by providing low interest rate
financing while maintaining a perpetual source of capital funds for future water quality projects. The goal is to
achieve a fund utilization rate (loans executed/total funds available) of 90% or greater. This is a Program
Activity Measure (PAM) under EPA’s strategic plan for the WQSRF. For FY 2010, MWQFA is projecting
WQSRF fund utilization rate of 90%. The WQSRF could finance approximately $790 million in additional
loans from capitalization grants, State match, loan repayments, and investment earnings between FFY 2010
and FFY 2014 IUPs (see graph below). This is in addition to the $1.74 billion capacity on existing IUPs (1989
- 2009). This analysis takes into account stimulus funds, existing and anticipated investment earnings, loan
repayments and assumes Maryland’s share of future Federal Capitalization Grant of minimum $49 million per
year (based on federal appropriation of $2.1 billion/yr). The cumulative loan capacity of the WQSRF is
projected to be ~$2.4 billion by FFY 2014.
Maryland WQSRF Funding Projection
2,500
2,023
1,873
1,743
2,000
$ MILLION
2,392
2,183
1,500
1,000
500
141
130
150
160
209
0
10
11
IUP YEAR
Annual IUP Capacity
12
12
14
Cumulative Loan Capacity
•
Funding Prioritization - Using the WQSRF updated program (January 2010) Integrated Project Priority
System (IPPS) rating and ranking system, target financial assistance to projects that help meet the State’s
nutrient (nitrogen & phosphorous) reduction objectives, restore surface water quality, and restore biological
integrity within priority water bodies. The IPPS focuses on targeted watersheds, water quality restoration and
biological integrity to protect public health and achieve compliance with discharge permits.
•
Reasonable User and Project Unit Cost - To ensure facilities are constructed and maintained at a reasonable
cost for the users of the system. To this end, MWQFA will continue to provide Disadvantaged Communities a
lower interest rate. For projects that have high unit cost per household, the MWQFA will continue to
coordinate its State grant programs with other Federal/State financial assistance programs (e.g., USDA Rural
Utilities Service, Community Development Block Grant, Federal Special Appropriation grants) that provide
approximately $15 million/year for water/sewerage system improvements in Maryland.
•
Financial Capacity & Disadvantaged Community Assistance - As part of the credit/financial analysis of
potential borrowers, the MWQFA will continue to provide financial advisory services to system owners on the
feasibility of their user rate structure and financial capacity to pay back a loan. The MWQFA financial model
forecasts future operating cash flows based on existing/proposed user rates using audited financial
statements. The model has been an effective tool to assist communities in developing affordable user rate
structures and in determining additional subsidies to disadvantaged communities.
Page 4
2.
Short-term Goals/FFY2010 IUP Operating Goals
•
Finance Advanced Treatment at WWTPs for Nutrient Reduction - To provide low-cost financing to local
governments, in tandem with the Maryland’s Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR) grants, to upgrade targeted
wastewater treatment facilities with advanced treatment to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus discharges as
part of the Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Reduction Goals. Maryland’s far-reaching legislation (Chesapeake Bay
Restoration Fund), which was signed into law in 2004 to address Bay restoration, created a dedicated fund
for upgrading the 67 largest wastewater treatment plants to Enhanced Nutrient Reduction (ENR) standards.
This ENR upgrade is expected to reduce 7.5 million pounds of nitrogen and 260,000 pounds of phosphorus
from entering into the Bay each year. This represents over one-third of Maryland’s commitment under the
2000 Chesapeake Bay Agreement. ENR projects are expected to receive up to 100% state grants for ENR
eligible components. Some non-eligible ENR components can be covered by the WQSRF. See Table 1 for
ENR projects identified for funding in the FFY 2010 IUP.
•
Community & Utility Sustainability - To provide low-cost capital financing to local governments to address
needed wastewater improvements that are necessary to maintain reliable facility operation and maintenance.
The FFY 2010 IUP, Table 1, identifies several projects needing secondary upgrades, studies, replacement,
and rehabilitation for WQSRF funding. In addition, MWQFA continues to work closely with facilities owners
and operators to undertake fiscal capacity management. Most of the credit capacity analysis includes detailed
discussions with potential loan recipients to ensure that enterprise funds become fiscally solvent. Fiscal
solvency includes reliable and dedicated sources of revenue and consideration to future activities such as
O&M, replacement and capital costs. MWQFA is also engaged in a collaborative effort with EPA to provide
additional support to projects that are supportive of sustainable development, green infrastructure, energy
efficiency, and environmental innovation. See Table 1 for projects identified for funding within this category.
•
Green Infrastructure, Water and Energy Efficiency and Environmental Innovation Projects: The State of
Maryland has made a concerted effort to actively solicit “Green” projects to be included in the FFY 2010 IUP
for funding to help restore Maryland’s tidal and non-tidal water resources as part of the larger goal of
Chesapeake Bay restoration. Green projects are integral to the innovative approach Maryland has taken
through the Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategies to address water quality issues throughout the Maryland
portion of the Bay watershed. With the federal funds, Maryland is focusing on water resource restoration,
protection, conservation, and innovative and energy efficient projects. The projects include living shorelines
(innovative techniques incorporating vegetative planting to protect shorelines while creating valuable tidal
habitat); stream, riparian and floodplain ecosystem restoration using methods that utilize native planting, and
naturally occurring rocks and boulders; wetlands creation and restoration; biofiltration, and primarily other
similar non-structural projects. Table 1 highlights a total of $10,212,418 or 21% of the 2010 Capitalization
grant to “green reserve.” Additional subsidy for green projects is based on funding eligibility (Appendix C).
•
Additional Subsidization and Eligible Recipients: Table 1 highlights a total of $16,020,052 or 33% of the 2010
Capitalization grant allocated to comply with the additional subsidization requirements related to the federal
2010 Appropriation Act, which authorizes the federal 2010 Capitalization Grant. Disadvantaged Community
(DAC) applicants (both green and non-green) may receive up to 87.5% of the project cost as grant or loan
forgiveness not to exceed $1.5 million (no cap for Green Reserve) based upon the DAC criteria below:
1. Water (or sewer, as applicable) user rate/year per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) > 1% of
Community Median Household Income (MHI); or
2. Project is physically located and benefits an MDE approved Environmental Benefit District; or
3. Project is physically located and benefits a community with MHI less than 70% of State MHI
In addition to above,
a. Where the water (or sewer, as applicable) user rate would increase by more than 20% to
achieve financial capacity (as determined by MDE), the Owner may qualify for up to 25% of
the loan amount as loan-forgiveness, not to exceed $1.5 million
b. Any non DAC applicant undertaking an eligible non-point source, green infrastructure, water
or energy efficiency improvement or environmental innovation project that does not have a
dedicated source of revenue, such as a user charge system to repay a loan is eligible to
receive up to 50% of the project costs as grant.
Visit the following link below for MDE’s funding eligibility (Appendix C):
http://www.mde.state.md.us/assets/document/Grant_Funding_Grid.pdf
Page 5
•
Finance Non-Point Source (NPS) Projects – Linked Deposit (LD): Continue funding of Privately Owned Nonpoint Source Projects using the LD Program. Since private entities do not receive a formal mail solicitation to
apply for WQSRF loans as local governments do, information regarding the WQSRF LD Program is provided
through a cooperative effort between Department of Natural Resources, Department of Agriculture, Local Soil
Conservation Districts, Local Health Departments, and Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE).
Information on the LD Program is also available on the MWQFA website. The MWQFA has previously
allocated $23 million of recycled funds (investment earnings/repayments) for eligible private NPS projects to
be funded on a first come first served basis using the LD Program. Based on demand, MWQFA is not
requesting new funds for Linked Deposit activity with the FFY 2010 IUP.
The LD Program is a mechanism that provides below market rate of interest loans to private entities for
eligible NPS projects through a network of private lending institutions. For example, a landowner with an
approved Best Management Practices (BMP) may apply to one of the network of banks for financing at a
below market rate of interest. The lender (bank) will evaluate the credit-worthiness of the borrower and if
acceptable will apply to the MWQFA for an investment agreement equal to the loan amount and term. Under
the FFY 2010 IUP, the investment agreement with banks will require an investment return equal to the
MWQFA standard interest rate on WQSRF loans rather than the market (CD) rate. The interest rate
difference will be passed down, as a subsidy, by the bank to the borrower. This MWQFA investment
agreement is “Linked” to the below market rate of interest loan by the bank to the borrower. The loan
agreement is between the bank and the borrower, and as such, the bank assumes all risk of default.
C. Project Selection and Fund Activities under the FFY 2010 IUP
Financial Assistance Applications for water quality projects were solicited in December 2009 through January 29,
2010 from local governments by the MWQFA to develop the Maryland Project Priority List (PPL). Project applications
were rated and ranked based on the Integrated Project Priority System and identified in the PPL for Federal FY 2010
and State FY 2012 Clean Water Funds. This PPL was used to select projects for the FFY 2010 IUP. Applicants with
projects identified on the PPL that ranked from number 1 through 62, that meet the readiness-to-proceed to
construction before December 2011, and where the applicants responded positively to pursuing a WQSRF loan are
included in the FFY 2010 IUP. Projects that are ranked 1-62, that are not ready to proceed to construction by
12/31/11, will be bypassed with PPL projects. Projects that are bypassed are encouraged to reapply during the
next funding cycle.
Table 1 shows the list of proposed projects, priority ranking and scoring, and the total fund sources and uses under
the FFY 2010 IUP. It highlights WQSRF admin fees and loan projects using Federal Capitalization Grant funds of
$49,279,000 matched with $9,855,800 in State general funds for a total of $59,134,800. Table 1 also highlights nonfederal funds for capital projects totaling $83,000,000.
Table 1A shows the federal equivalency projects. The 4% of Federal Capitalization Grant amount $1,971,160 may be
utilized for WQSRF administrative expenses, as follows (see table 2 for breakdown of 4% costs).
Table 2
Indirect Costs
Item
Salary and Fringe
Indirect Overhead (25.74%)
Contractor Fees
Travel/Training
Office Supplies
Office Equipment
Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Est. $ Amount
1,552,112
399,514
12,000
3,351
4,182
1,971,160
% of Total
78.74%
20.27%
0.00%
0.61%
0.17%
0.21%
100.00%
Notes
Computers and Equipment
Page 6
Administrative Costs:
Up to a total of $1,971,160 may be used for CWSRF program administration (4% administrative costs). Additional
breakdown of the 4% costs noted above include
•
Travel and training costs of $12,000 will be broken down in the following areas;
o 3 staff @ $1,500 each for a total of $4,500 to attend annual CIFA conference (Out of state Travel)
o 5 staff @ $500 each for a total of $2,500 to attend professional training courses & EPA training
o 3 staff @$1,000 each for a total of $3,000 to attend annual SRF Region 3 All States meeting
o 4 staff @ $500 each for a total of $2,000 to attend other required meetings (need surveys, CBR/PBR,
etc,)
•
Office supplies costs of $3,351 will be used to purchase computers, peripherals, and paper supply, etc.,
•
Office equipment cost of $4,182 will be used to purchase furniture for new staff
CWSRF Loan Guarantees – For projects on the FFY 2010 waiting list (below the direct loan funding line), MWQFA
will consider providing loan guarantees as security for payment of debt service on locally issued debt, if this provides
the applicant material financing costs savings.
Program Income (Non Federal Funds)
The MWQFA charges loan fees equal to 5% of annual debt service, which are used for administrative expenses in
addition to the 4% setaside. The details related to the program income and uses are provided each year in the annual
report. In SFY 2010 and 2009, fee revenues were $3.49 million & $3.53 million, respectively, while expenses were
$3.35 million and $3. 7 million (projected), respectively. In SFY 2011, the expected fee revenues of $3.6 million.
D. Project Scope of Work/Environmental Benefits – FFY 2010 IUP Projects
The following are examples of the type of projects selected for financial assistance in the FFY 2010 IUP. The detailed
Environmental Benefits Reporting (EPA one-pager) for each Section 212 project below will also be provided in the
annual report to EPA. In addition, any 319 project funded through the direct loan program and Linked Deposit
projects will be identified in the one-pagers by specific categories as part of the annual report.
•
This Anne Arundel County Cox Creek Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR)
Upgrade project (Rank 5/30) consists of construction of Single-Stage Membrane Bioreactors to achieve the
ENR effluent goals of 3.0 mg/L Total Nitrogen (TN) and 0.3 mg/L Total Phosphorus (TP). At the existing 15
mgd capacity, the ENR upgrade will reduce the TN load to the Chesapeake Bay by 228,417 lbs/year and the
TP load to the Bay by 77,662 lbs. /year. Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan will be utilized for
improvements that are ineligible or only partially eligible for ENR grant, including: modifications to the primary
clarifiers; grit effluent channels and Parshall Flume; replacement of primary sludge pumps; high flow
management treatment system; gravity thickening; scum handling; and piping. This WRF is owned by Anne
Arundel County and consists of approximately 207,849 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs).
•
This City of Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Plant Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR) Upgrade project
(Rank 9/30) involves planning, design and construction of ENR facilities at the existing 8.0 million gallons per
day (mgd) facility. Upon completion, effluent concentration goals of 3 mg/l for Total Nitrogen (TN) and 0.3
mg/l for Total Phosphorus (TP) will be achieved and nutrient loads to the Chesapeake Bay will be reduced by
123,345 lbs /year of TN and 41,937 lbs/year of TP. Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan and Loan
Forgiveness will be utilized for improvements that are ineligible or only partially eligible for ENR grant,
including: a primary clarifier; gravity sludge thickener, solids dewatering, and miscellaneous modifications to
the existing process. This facility is owned by City of Cambridge and is a disadvantaged community
consisting of approximately 4,364 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs).
•
This Garner Brandywine Scrap Tire Stockpile Cleanup Project (Rank 17/28) undertaken by Maryland
Environmental Services responds to a Departmental enforcement action to clean up over one million illegally
dumped tires in a ravine located in Prince George’s County. Along with removing the tires, the project will
Page 7
also restore 8,446 linear feet of waterway. The “green” portion of the project will restore intermittent stream
channels, 1.5 acres of nontidal wetland and 6.3 acres of wetland transition areas.
•
This Anne Arundel County Broadwater Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR)
Upgrade project (Rank 22/27) consists of planning, design and construction of ENR facilities (Modified
Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) technology) at the existing 2.0 million gallons per day (mgd) facility. The planning
phase will include trials to determine the most appropriate technology to achieve the ENR effluent goals of 3.0
mg/L Total Nitrogen (TN) and 0.3 mg/L Total Phosphorus (TP). Upon completion, the ENR upgrade will
nutrient loads to the Chesapeake Bay by 30,456 lbs/year and the TP load to the Bay by 10,355 lbs. per year.
Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan will be utilized for improvements that are ineligible or only partially
eligible for ENR grant. “Green” loan and grant will be utilized for equipment fitted with high efficiency motors
and variable frequency drives. This WRF is owned by Anne Arundel County and consists of approximately
207,849 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs).
•
This Potomac Heights Stormwater Improvement Project is a “green” project to be cost-shared between the
Potomac Heights Mutual Home Owners Association (Rank 50/25) and the Charles County Commissioners
(Rank 51/25) to address inadequately designed stormwater conveyance in the Potomac Heights
neighborhood. The joint project will focus on a stormwater drainage area of 77 acres and will restore 18,984
linear feet of existing drainage ditches, storm drains and roads that have gone into disrepair. Along with
stormwater conveyance improvements, the project will also add one wet pond to the area to collect and treat
runoff without having a major impact on the community or surrounding environment.
•
This Rhode River Living Shoreline Project (Rank 53/26) undertaken by the Chesapeake Bay Trust is a
“green” project to address a rapidly eroding shoreline in Chester Point at the confluence of the Rhode and
West Rivers. This project will protect 1,500 linear feet of shoreline using a combination of stone breakwaters,
sand planting platforms, low marsh and high marsh plantings. These techniques will create 3.5 acres of new
wetland and benefit many species that inhabit the local waters.
E. Minority Business Enterprises/Women’s Business Enterprises (M/WBE) Participation
On October 30, 2009, EPA advised MDE of the M/WBE “fair share” utilization requirements for FFY 2009 through
2012. EPA approved MDE’s previously existing goals for another three years (until September 30, 2012) since the
study used for those numbers was less than ten years old. The M/WBE goals for the SRF programs are a total of 22%
and by category as: “construction” (11% MBE and 11% WBE), “services” (12% MBE and 10% WBE), “supplies” (11%
MBE and 11% WBE), and “equipment” (11% MBE and 11% WBE). These goals will be applicable to loans using
Federal Capitalization Grant and State matching funds. The MDE’s Water Management Administration provides
borrowers an “Insert” for inclusion in procurement/bid documents, which outlines the M/WBE (%) goals and the
affirmative/positive steps necessary to show a good faith effort consistent with federal regulations under 40 CFR Part
31.36(e). Failure to meet the M/WBE goals does not preclude the use of the SRF, as long as the good faith effort can
be demonstrated and documented. It is important that the loan recipients and their prime contractors undertake the
necessary affirmative/positive steps to assure that M/WBE firms are afforded opportunity to participate in SRF
projects. M/WBE Program details and forms are available on MDE’s web site at www.mde.state.md.us.
F. Assurances
The Department agrees to comply with the Federal program requirements as outlined in the Operating Agreement
between EPA and MDE dated November 5, 1997 with amendments August 21, 1998 and March18, 2008.
G. Binding Commitments and Cash Draw Projections
The projected binding commitments/federal payment schedule and total cash draw projections are shown on Table 1.
H. Public Review of the Final FFY 2010 IUP
Applicants that submitted Financial Assistance Applications were sent an e-mail providing the Draft FFY 2010 IUP
project list and informing them on the availability of the Draft IUP/PPL on MDE’s website on Friday May 14, 2010.
This Final FFY 2010 IUP was the subject of a public hearing on Friday June 18, 2010 at 10:00 AM at the Maryland
Page 8
Department of Environment (Terra Conference Room, 1st Floor Lobby), 1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland, 21230. The public hearing record was closed on June 25, 2010. Comments on the FFY 2010 IUP were
submitted via e-mail, fax, and mail and/or in person at the public hearing. All comments are included in the
responsiveness summary (Appendix D). MDE will respond to those who submitted comments at the public hearing
requesting certain actions.
Page 9
Page 1 of 4
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION
FFY 2010 FINAL INTENDED USE PLAN
MARYLAND WATER QUALITY REVOLVING LOAN FUND
CAP GRANT
$
49,279,000
Admin
$
1,971,160
Table 1: WQSRF PROJECT LIST
$
142,134,800
Capital Projects
$
State Match
$
9,855,800
Investments/Interest
$
15,000,000
Loan %
New Repayments
$
68,000,000
$
$
140,163,640
Total Funding
APPLICANT
COUNTY
PROJECT NAME
47,307,840 IUP Categories
Loan Forg.%
120,178,247
$
9,772,976
86%
Green Loan %
$
3,965,342
20%
Green Grant %
$
6,247,076
8%
13%
TOTAL
FFY '10
CW
CW
CW
CW
PRIORITY
SCORING
CONST.
COST ($)
REQUEST($)
LOAN
Loan Forg.
GREEN LOAN
Green Grant
RANK
POINTS
START
Baltimore County DPW
Baltimore
Patapsco WWTP ENR Modification - Contract (SC855)
$
6,919,000
$
6,919,000
$
3,300,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
1
30
Jul-10
ENR Funding
Baltimore County DPW
Baltimore
Patapsco WWTP BNR Contract (SC845)
$
34,779,740
$
34,779,740
$
16,000,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
2
30
Jun-10
ENR Funding
Baltimore City CO DPW
Baltimore City
Patapsco WWTP BNR Contract (SC845)
$
168,183,259
$
16,366,936
$
11,000,000
$
1,500,000
$
-
$
-
3
30
Jun-10
ENR Funding
Baltimore City CO DPW
Baltimore City
Patapsco WWTP ENR Modification - Contract (SC855)
$
32,256,000
$
3,256,000
$
2,442,000
$
814,000
$
-
$
-
4
30
Jul-10
ENR Funding
Anne Arundel County
Anne Arundel
Cox Creek WRF - ENR Upgrade
$
162,644,880
$
159,270,827
$
9,109,333
$
-
$
-
$
-
5
30
Feb-10
ENR/Previous IUP Funding
Charles Co. Commissioners
Charles
College So MD & Mt Carmel Woods WWTPs Upgrade
$
6,208,190
$
3,104,095
$
3,000,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
6
30
Jul-10
Talbot County
Talbot
Talbot Co. Biosolids Utilization Facility Upgrades
$
3,100,000
$
3,025,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
7
30
Oct-11
PFA Issues
Caroline County Commissioners
Caroline
North County Regional WW Collection & Treatment PI
$
4,716,000
$
1,960,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
8
30
Nov-11
Water & Sewer & PFA Issues
Mun. Utilities Com. C/O Cambridge
Dorchester
Cambridge WWTP ENR Upgrade
$
9,339,000
$
9,339,000
$
1,000,000
$
250,000
$
-
$
-
9
30
Feb-11
ENR Funding
Pocomoke City
Worcester
Pocomoke City ENR Upgrade - Additional Costs
$
500,000
$
500,000
$
62,500
$
437,500
$
-
$
-
10
30
Nov-10
ENR Funding
Town Comm. Of Denton
Caroline
Denton WWTP ENR Upgrade
$
6,003,591
$
6,003,591
$
59,961
$
417,324
$
-
$
-
11
30
May-10
ENR Funding
Town of Federalsburg
Caroline
Railroad Ave CSO Removal Project
$
1,300,000
$
1,300,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
12
30
Apr-11
Not Intersted in Loan; other State Funding
Town of Snow Hill
Worcester
Snow Hill WWTP BNR/ENR Upgrade
$
14,015,224
$
6,567,210
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
13
30
Nov-10
Previous IUP
Town of Greensboro
Caroline
Greensboro WWTP Capacity Upgrade
$
3,230,000
$
730,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
14
30
Nov-12
Water & Sewer & PFA Issues; Late Start
Anne Arundel County
Anne Arundel
Annapolis WRF - ENR Upgrade
$
26,563,056
$
25,932,056
$
$
-
$
15
29
Sep-10
ENR Funding; Green (E)
Montgomery County DEP
Montgomery
Landfare Stormwater Management Pond Retrofit
$
271,742
$
203,807
$
$
-
16
28
May-11
Not Intersted in Loan
MES
Prince George's
Garner/Brandywine Scrap Tire Stockpile Cleanup
$
8,845,475
$
6,720,475
$
5,852,975
$
Green (G)
MES
Caroline
Hobbs Road Landfill Closure & Capping
$
3,454,324
$
3,454,324
$
2,590,743
$
12,500,000
7,000,000
-
863,581
166,704
$
$
$
433,750
$
17
28
Jun-09
-
$
-
18
28
Jun-10
Allegany
Linden St. CSO Eliminiation Project Phase VI D&E
$
1,590,995
$
500,000
WSSC
Regional
Blue Plains WWTP ENR
$
401,500,000
$
401,500,000
$
Anne Arundel County
Anne Arundel
Broadneck WRF - ENR Upgrade
$
25,370,290
$
24,772,194
$
$
-
$
351,074
$
Anne Arundel County
Anne Arundel
Broadwater WRF ENR Upgrade
$
13,089,500
$
12,415,970
$
5,000,000
$
-
$
95,458
$
Anne Arundel County
Anne Arundel
Maryland City WRF - ENR Upgrade
$
8,757,161
$
8,214,455
$
4,067,818
$
-
$
155,382
Anne Arundel County
Anne Arundel
Patuxent WRF - ENR Upgrade
$
19,665,251
$
19,192,914
$
5,000,000
$
-
$
432,500
Washinton Co. Dept Engineer Services
Washington
Winebrenner WWTP ENR Upgrade
$
17,665,200
$
17,447,500 $
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
Washinton Co. Dept Engineer Services
Washington
Conococheague WWTP ENR Upgrade & Expansion
$
36,038,200
$
36,038,200
Board of Commissioners Cecil County
Cecil
Rock Run Sewer Extension
$
1,100,000
$
1,100,000
$
St. Mary's Met. Comm.
St. Mary's
Marlay-Taylor WRF ENR Upgrade
$
13,157,360
$
13,157,360
$
7,894,416
-
$
City of Frostburg
-
166,704
433,750
$
-
$
-
$
-
19
28
Oct-10
Not Interested in Loan; other State funding
$
-
$
-
$
-
20
27
Sep-11
ENR Funding
351,074
21
27
Jan-11
ENR Funding; Green (E)/Previous IUP
95,458
22
27
Feb-11
ENR Funding; Green (E)
$
155,382
23
27
Jan-11
ENR Funding; Green (E)
$
432,500
24
27
Jan-11
ENR Funding; Green (E)
-
25
27
Jun-12
ENR Funding; Late Start
$
-
26
27
Oct-11
ENR/Previous IUP Funding
$
-
27
27
Mar-11
Water & Sewer & PFA Issues
-
$
-
28
27
Jun-10
ENR Funding
ENR/Previous IUP Funding
Calvert Co. Board of Commissioners
Calvert
Chesapeake Beach WWTP ENR/Expansion - Calvert Co. $
3,288,314
$
3,281,738
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
29
27
Apr-11
Town of Chesapeake Beach
Calvert
Chesapeake Beach WWTP ENR/Expansion - Chesapeake $
13,444,674
$
13,429,560
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
30
27
Apr-11
ENR/Previous IUP Funding
Town of North Beach
Calvert
Chesapeake Beach WWTP ENR/Expansion - Town of Nor $
2,800,010
$
2,800,010
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
31
27
Apr-11
ENR/Previous IUP Funding
Somerset Co. Sanitary District
Somerset
Tylertown WWTP Upgrade
$
482,000
$
482,000
$
45,187
$
15,063
$
-
$
-
32
27
Oct-10
Other State Funding
Mayor & City Council of Cumberland
Allegany
Cumberland CSO Improvements, Phase IB (C&O CA)
$
19,319,000
$
19,319,000
$
6,000,000
$
1,500,000
$
-
$
-
33
27
Nov-10
Phased/Other State Funding
City of Cumberland
Allegany
Cumberland CSO Storage Facility WWTP No. 01-10-WWT$
24,200,000
$
23,800,000
$
Late start
City of Cumberland
Allegany
Evitts Creek CSO Upgrades Phase 3 Gravity Sewer
8,510,000
$
8,410,000
$
6,910,000
$
1,500,000
712,500
$
237,500
$
City of Cumberland
Allegany
Cedar Steet/Rt. 51 Crossing Combined Sewer
$
950,000
$
950,000
$
WSSC
Prince George's
Parkway WWTP ENR
$
19,645,000
$
19,645,000
$
Corporation of Westminster
Carroll
Westminster WWTP ENR
$
26,940,000
$
26,940,000
$
City of Aberdeen
Harford
Aberdeen ENR Upgrade
$
26,328,825
$
1,500,000
$
Commissioners of Thurmont
Frederick
Thurmont WWTP ENR Upgrade
$
8,993,000
$
6,000,000
$
-
5,044,000
1,000,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
34
27
Apr-12
$
-
$
-
35
27
Dec-11
$
-
$
-
36
27
Feb-11
$
-
$
-
$
-
37
27
Aug-10
Not Interested in Loan; ENR Funding
$
-
$
-
$
-
38
27
Aug-11
ENR Funding/Phased
$
-
$
-
$
-
39
27
Feb-10
Not Interested in Loan; ENR Funding
$
-
$
-
$
-
40
27
Jun-10
ENR Funding
Page 2 of 4
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION
FFY 2010 FINAL INTENDED USE PLAN
MARYLAND WATER QUALITY REVOLVING LOAN FUND
CAP GRANT
$
49,279,000
Admin
$
1,971,160
Table 1: WQSRF PROJECT LIST
$
142,134,800
Capital Projects
$
State Match
$
9,855,800
Investments/Interest
$
15,000,000
Loan %
New Repayments
$
68,000,000
$
$
140,163,640
Total Funding
APPLICANT
COUNTY
PROJECT NAME
47,307,840 IUP Categories
Loan Forg.%
120,178,247
$
9,772,976
86%
Green Loan %
$
3,965,342
20%
Green Grant %
$
6,247,076
8%
13%
TOTAL
FFY '10
CW
CW
CW
CW
PRIORITY
SCORING
CONST.
COST ($)
REQUEST($)
LOAN
Loan Forg.
GREEN LOAN
Green Grant
RANK
POINTS
START
Town of Emmitsburg
Frederick
Emmitsburg WWTP ENR Upgrade
$
15,300,000
$
5,000,000
$
2,500,000
$
Town of Westernport
Allegany
Westernport CSO Elimination - Philos Ave Area
$
1,400,000
$
1,400,000
$
175,000
$
WSSC
Prince George's
Western Branch WWTP ENR
$
74,000,000
$
74,000,000
$
-
$
Balto Co. Bureau Solid Waste Mgmt
Baltimore
Hernwood Landfill Leachate Seep Collection
$
2,275,000
$
2,000,000
$
-
$
Balto Co. Bureau Solid Waste Mgmt
Baltimore
Hernwood Landfill Groundwater Remediation
$
2,200,000
$
2,000,000
$
-
Talbot County
Talbot
Renewable Energy for Tilghman Island WWTP
$
600,000
$
600,000
$
Salisbury Public Works
Wicomico
Salisbury Sewer Lateral Rehab
$
600,000
$
600,000
$
$
-
$
-
41
27
Aug-11
$
-
$
-
42
27
Nov-10
-
$
-
$
-
43
26
Aug-10
ENR/Previous IUP Funding
-
$
-
$
-
44
26
Mar-12
Late Start
$
-
$
-
$
-
45
26
Mar-12
Late Start
-
$
-
$
46
26
Oct-11
Green (E)
-
$
-
$
47
26
Sep-10
Not Interested in Loan
48
26
Oct-11
Green (E)
49
25
Jun-11
City of Fruitland
Wicomico
Fruitland ENR Sludge Handling Project
$
1,767,315
$
1,767,315
$
220,914
$
Montgomery County DEP
Montgomery
Gudelsky Stormwater Mgmt. Pond Retrofit
$
1,100,503
$
825,377
$
825,377
$
1,225,000
707,651
$
300,000
104,844
$
$
$
300,000
733,906
-
ENR/Previous IUP Funding
Potomac Hgts Mutual Home Owners
Charles
Potomac Heights SWM Imps-Potomac Heights HOAShare $
2,521,983
$
2,371,980
$
-
$
-
$
1,260,992
$
1,260,992
50
25
Nov-10
Green (G)
Charles Co. Commissioners
Charles
Potomac Heights SWM BMPS - Charles County Share
$
739,280
$
369,640
$
-
$
-
$
369,640
$
369,640
51
25
Nov-10
Green (G)
Chester Harbor Prop. Owners Assoc
Queen Anne's
Chester Harbor Property Owners Assoc
$
336,964
$
336,964
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
11,172
52
25
Jul-11
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Chesapeake Bay Trust
Anne Arundel
Rhode River Living Shorline
$
1,230,000
$
1,185,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
615,000
53
25
Oct-11
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
City of Salisbury
Wicomico
Waverly Drive WQ Storm Drain Inlets
$
967,680
$
967,680
$
-
$
54
25
Apr-11
725,760
$
241,920
$
-
City of Salisbury
Wicomico
Brewington Branch Drainage and WQ Improvements
$
232,500
$
232,500
$
9,063
$
63,438
$
20,000
$
140,000
55
25
Sep-10
Town of Sharptown
Wicomico
Sharptown WWTP Replacement Existing Pump Station
$
555,020
$
480,700 $
130,700
$
-
$
175,000
$
175,000
56
25
Oct-10
Green (G)
Green (E)
Chesapeake Rivers Assoc. Inc.
Anne Arundel
Cabin Branch Stormwater Restoration
$
650,000
$
650,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
325,000
57
24
Oct-10
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Chesapeake Bay Trust
Anne Arundel
Camp Letts Stormwater Wetland
$
163,000
$
158,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
81,500
58
24
Dec-11
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Talbot County
Talbot
Hyde Park Sewer Extension
$
2,046,450
$
2,031,450
$
-
$
-
$
37,500
$
37,500
59
24
Nov-10
Green (E)
Talbot County
Talbot
Talbot Trailer Park Sewer Extension
$
1,482,600
$
1,472,600
$
-
$
-
$
37,500
$
37,500
60
24
Nov-10
Green (E)
Talbot County
Talbot
Talbot County Community Sewer Extension Project
$
1,992,500
$
1,967,500
$
-
$
-
$
25,000
$
25,000
61
24
Nov-10
Green (E)
Chesapeake River Assoc. Inc.
Anne Arundel
Clements Creek Confluence Bog
$
1,000,000
$
1,000,000
$
-
$
$
500,000
62
24
Oct-10
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
$
6,247,076
$
120,178,247
$
$
9,772,976
$
-
3,965,342
Additional Subsidy Required
$
7,380,430
Green Reserve Required
$
9,855,800
Additional Subsidy Achieved
$
16,020,052
Green Reserve Achieved
$
10,212,418
Waitng List & PPL Projects
If projects identified for funding are not ready to proceed to construction by 12/31/2011, projects from the Project Priority List (PPL) will be selected based on readiness to proceed.
Waiting list/PPL projects that were not selected for funding, but are able to proceed to construction by 12/31/211 are encouraged to contact MDE loan officers for potential funding.
Projects that are listed with zero dollars were either not interested in loans or did not respond to loan interest letter. Future loan interest can only be accommodated based on funding availability.
Page 3 of 4
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION
FFY 2010 FINAL INTENDED USE PLAN
MARYLAND WATER QUALITY REVOLVING LOAN FUND
CAP GRANT
$
49,279,000
Admin
$
1,971,160
Table 1: WQSRF PROJECT LIST
$
142,134,800
Capital Projects
$
State Match
$
9,855,800
Investments/Interest
$
15,000,000
Loan %
New Repayments
$
68,000,000
$
$
140,163,640
Total Funding
APPLICANT
COUNTY
PROJECT NAME
47,307,840 IUP Categories
Loan Forg.%
120,178,247
$
Green Loan %
9,772,976
86%
$
Green Grant %
3,965,342
20%
$
6,247,076
8%
13%
TOTAL
FFY '10
CW
CW
CW
CW
PRIORITY
SCORING
CONST.
COST ($)
REQUEST($)
LOAN
Loan Forg.
GREEN LOAN
Green Grant
RANK
POINTS
START
GREEN WAITING LIST
City of Crisfield
Somerset
Crisfield Wind Turbine Power for the WWTP
$
4,810,000
$
4,810,000
$
-
$
-
$
625,300 $
4,184,700
76
23
Oct-11
Green (E)
Montgomery County DEP
Montgomery
Aspen Hill Library LID Retrofit
$
154,539
$
115,904
$
-
$
-
$
77,270 $
77,270
77
22
Sep-10
Green (G)
Montgomery County DEP
Montgomery
Kensington Park Library LID Retrofit Project
$
180,383
$
135,287
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
90,192
78
22
Sep-10
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Baltimore County DEP
Baltimore
Essex Skypark Shoreline Enhancement
$
1,300,000
$
600,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
650,000
79
22
Dec-10
Anne Arundel County DPW
Anne Arundel
Ruppert Ravine Phase 2
$
714,000
$
535,500
$
-
$
-
$
357,000
$
357,000
80
22
Howard County DPW
Howard
Hitech Road Stream Stabilization
$
700,000
$
350,000
$
-
$
-
$
350,000
$
350,000
82
22
Nov-11
Green (G)
City of Rockville
Montgomery
Glenora Tributary Middle Stream Restoration
$
767,600
$
767,600
$
-
$
-
$
383,800
$
383,800
85
22
Jul-11
Green (G)
Chesapeaeke Bay Trust
Anne Arundel
Church Creek Stormwater Wetland
$
1,031,000
$
971,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
515,500
87
22
Dec-11
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Town of Perryville
Cecil
Town of Perryville Living Shoreline Project
$
691,850
$
691,850
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
345,925
94
22
Aug-11
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Green (G)
Chesapeake Bay Trust
Baltimore City
Jones Falls Stream Restoration
$
768,000
$
738,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
672,000
98
21
Oct-11
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Harford County
Harford
Sunnyview Stream Restoration Project
$
627,500
$
300,000
$
-
$
-
$
313,750
$
313,750
99
21
Aug-11
Green (G)
Harford County
Harford
Bynum Run @ St. Andrew Way Stream Restoration
$
332,500
$
332,500
$
-
$
-
$
166,250
$
166,250
100
21
Jan-11
Green (G)
GB Crossing, Inc.
Anne Arundel
Glen Burnie Crossing Regenerative SW Conveyance
$
248,000
$
124,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
124,000
110
20
May-10
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Talbot County
Talbot
Renewable Energy for Reg II WWTP
$
325,000
$
325,000
$
-
$
-
$
40,625
$
284,375
111
20
Oct-11
Green (E)
Bausum Riva, Inc
Anne Arundel
Bausum Property Regenerative Stormwater Convey
$
829,000
$
414,500
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
414,500
112
20
Jun-11
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Elselore Pretzler
Talbot
Pretzler Living Shoreline
$
166,100
$
166,100
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
83,050
130
19
Oct-11
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Chesapeake Bay Trust
Worcester
Upper St. Martins River Restoration
$
1,157,000
$
575,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
578,500
133
18
Oct-11
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Helen Hardcastle
Cecil
Hardcastle Bohemia River Living Shoreline & Spit
$
182,140
$
182,140
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
91,070
146
18
Aug-11
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Terra Noval Ventures, LLC
Baltimore City
Jones Falls Stream Restoration at Mt. Vernon Mills
$
87,500
$
43,750
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
76,563
147
17
Jul-11
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Somerset Co. Sanitary District
Somerset
Princess Anne WWTP Effluent Reuse
$
157,231
$
157,231
$
-
$
-
$
19,654
$
137,577
148
17
Dec-10
Green (W)
City of Bowie
Prince George's
Bowie WWTP Building Addition
$
500,000
$
500,000
$
-
$
-
$
76,700
$
76,700
150
16
Jan-11
Green (E)
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Alliance-Restoration of NW Creek
Queen Anne's
Restoration of Northwest Creek
$
732,375
$
732,375
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
157
15
Aug-11
Talbot County
Talbot
Renewable Energy for Pump Stations in Royal Oak
$
390,000
$
390,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
158
15
Oct-11
Green (E)/PFA Issues
Town of Mt. Lake Park
Garrett
Town of Mt. Lake Park Pensinger Water Qualilty
$
1,129,229
$
1,129,229
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
88,594
161
15
Apr-10
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Town of Federalsburg
Caroline
Veterans Drive Shoreline Erosion Control - Design
$
62,612
$
62,612
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
54,786
181
8
Nov-11
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Town of Betterton
Kent
Betterton Bayside Blvd. Living Shoreline Project
$
29,040
$
29,040
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
14,520
182
8
Talbot County
Talbot
Relocated Easton Memorial Hospital Sewer Extension
$
3,557,000
$
3,332,000
$
-
$
-
$
150,000
$
150,000
184
2
Nov-10
Green (E)
$
-
$
2,560,348
$
10,280,620
Waitng List & PPL Projects
If projects identified for funding are not ready to proceed to construction by 7/2011, projects from the waiting list or project priority list will be selected based on readiness to proceed.
Waiting list/PPL projects that were not selected for funding, but are able to proceed to construction by 7/1/211 by meeting MDE's requirements are encouraged to contact MDE loan officers for potential funding.
Projects that are listed with zero dollars were either not interested in loans or did not respond to loan interest letter. Future loan interest can only be accommodated based on funding availability.
Not Interested in Loan - Green (G)
Page 4 of 4
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION
FFY 2010 FINAL INTENDED USE PLAN
MARYLAND WATER QUALITY REVOLVING LOAN FUND
CAP GRANT
$
49,279,000
Admin
$
1,971,160
Table 1: WQSRF PROJECT LIST
$
142,134,800
Capital Projects
$
State Match
$
9,855,800
Investments/Interest
$
15,000,000
Loan %
New Repayments
$
68,000,000
$
$
140,163,640
Total Funding
APPLICANT
COUNTY
PROJECT NAME
FFY 2010 Sources of Funds
Loan Forg.%
120,178,247
$
FFY 2010 Federal Cap. Grant
$
$
Recycled. Funds 20010 & InvestmentsIUP (Net)
$
Green Loan %
9,772,976
86%
$
Green Grant %
3,965,342
20%
$
6,247,076
8%
13%
TOTAL
FFY '10
CW
CW
CW
CW
PRIORITY
SCORING
CONST.
COST ($)
REQUEST($)
LOAN
Loan Forg.
GREEN LOAN
Green Grant
RANK
POINTS
START
Total FFY 2010 Uses of Funds
State Matching Grant (20%)
Total
47,307,840 IUP Categories
Total
Federal
State
Recylced
Revenue Bonds
49,279,000
9,855,800 Capital Project/Direct Loans
83,000,000 Admin. Expenses (Max 4% of Cap. Grant)
$
-
Capital Projects/Linked Deposit Loans
$
142,134,800 Total
$
140,163,640 $
47,307,840
$
$
1,971,160 $
1,971,160
$
-
$
-
$
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
142,134,800 $
49,279,000
$
9,855,800
$
83,000,000 $
-
$
$
$
-
9,855,800 $
83,000,000 $
-
0.00
FEDERAL PAYMENT & BINDING COMMITMENT SCHEDULE
Quarter
FFY 2011- Q4
Project Loans using Cap. Grant & State Match
$
Administrative Costs using Federal Grant & State Match - 4%
$
Subtotal - Federal/State Binding Commitment
$
Federal Payment Schedule
$
Quarter
FFY 2012- Q1
57,163,640 $
FFY 2012- Q2
FFY 2012- Q3
FFY 2012- Q4
FFY 2013- Q1
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
FFY 2013- Q2
1,971,160
59,134,800 $
49,279,000 $
FFY 2011- Q4
FFY 2012- Q1
26,864,250
FFY 2012- Q2
$
8,047,807
FFY 2012- Q3
$
FFY 2012- Q4
1,819,700
Total
$
FFY 2013- Q1
Project Loans using Non- Federal & State Match funds
$
46,268,244 $
Total Binding Commitments - All Sources
$
105,403,044 $
26,864,250 $
8,047,807 $
1,819,700 $
-
Cash Flow Projections (Total)
$
26,350,761 $
33,066,823 $
35,078,775 $
35,533,700 $
9,182,939 $
$
12,319,750
$
12,319,750
$
12,319,750
$
12,319,750
$
-
$
-
20% $
2,463,950
$
2,463,950
$
2,463,950
$
2,463,950
$
-
$
-
57,163,640
$
1,971,160
$
59,134,800
$
49,279,000
FFY 2013- Q2
Total
$
-
$
83,000,000
$
-
$
142,134,800
454,925 $
142,134,800
$
49,279,000
2,466,877 $
Project Level Disbursement & Admin
Federal Cap (Baltimore County)
State Match
Recycled
$
11,567,061 $
18,283,123 $
20,295,075 $
20,750,000 $
9,182,939 $
$
2,466,877 $
-
$
9,855,800
454,925 $
83,000,000
APPENDIX - A
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
MARYLAND
PROJECT PRIORITY LIST FOR FEDERAL AND STATE
FY 2010 - 2012
CLEAN WATER FUNDS
(STATE REVOLVING LOAN/STATE GRANT)
Prepared By
WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
PLEASE CALL 410-537- 3119
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Rank/
Points
1
Project Title/
Number/ Population
Maryland FINAL Project Priority List for Federal FY2010 & State FY2012
Clean Water Funds (State Revolving Loan/ State Grant)
Project
Description
Applicant Name/
County
PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE
PATAPSCO WWTP ENR
MODIFICATIONS - CONTRACT CHESAPEAKE BAY; CONSENT ORDER JFM-02-1524
(BALT COUNTY SHARE; TOTAL COST = $39.2M)
SC-855
PCW 0194
POPULATION = 799215
PATAPSCO WWTP BNR CONTRACT SC-845
PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY;
CONSENT ORDER JFM-02-1524 (COUNTY SHARE;
TOTAL = $202.96M)
POPULATION = 799215
PATAPSCO WWTP BNR CONTRACT SC-845
PROJECT: CONSTRUCT BIOLOGICAL AERATED
FILTERS TO ACHIEVE NITRIFICATION AS PART OF
ENR UPGRADE
PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY;
JFM-02-1524 (CITY SHARE; TOTAL = $202.96M)
02-13-09-03
PCW 0145
POPULATION = 641943
PROJECT: CONSTRUCT BIOLOGICAL AERATED
FILTERS TO ACHIEVE NITRIFICATION AS PART OF
ENR UPGRADE
PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE
PATAPSCO WWTP ENR
MODIFICATIONS - CONTRACT CHESAPEAKE BAY; CONSENT ORDER JFM-02-1524
(BALT CITY SHARE; TOTAL = $39.2M)
SC-855
PCW 0147
POPULATION = 641943
COX CREEK WRF - ENR
UPGRADE
POPULATION = 519623
2
02-13-09-03
LARGE
I. Secondary Treatment
II. Advanced Treatment
IIIA. I/I Correction
07/01/2010
34,779,740
LOAN INTEREST
II = 34,779,740
34,779,740
06/01/2010
02/28/2013
(L) 10 IUP
Baltimore County
LORENZO L. GARRETT
W/S: Y
46
2
168,183,259
PFA: Y
02-13-09-03
LOAN INTEREST
II = 168,183,259
16,366,936
PUBLIC Construction
LARGE
06/01/2010
DISADV. 02/28/2013
(L) 10 IUP
Baltimore City
LORENZO L. GARRETT
46
2
02-13-09-03
W/S: Y
Design
PFA: Y
11/01/2006
32,256,000
LOAN INTEREST
II = 32,256,000
3,256,000
PUBLIC Construction
LARGE
07/01/2010
DISADV. 04/30/2012
(L) 10 IUP
GLENN SHIPLEY
02
PROJECT: UPGRADE THE 15 MGD PLANT TO ENR
LEVELS WITHOUT EXPANSION
IIIB. Major Sewer Rehab
IVA. New Collector Sewer
IVB. New Interceptor Sewer
V. Combined Sewer Overflow
6,919,000
PUBLIC Construction
02-13-09-03
W/S: Y
Design
PFA: Y
10/01/2006
162,644,880
LOAN INTEREST
I = 162,644,880
159,270,827
PUBLIC Construction
LARGE
02/01/2010
08/31/2015
(L) 10 IUP
Anne Arundel County
NEEDS CATEGORY DEFINITIONS:
II =
6,919,000
PFA: Y
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
PCW 0084
6,919,000
Cost By
Needs Category
PUBLIC Construction
W/S: Y
46
30
30
Design
11/01/2006
MDE
Funding
(L) 10 IUP
GLEN KELLER
PROJECT: MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO IMPROVE
PERFORMANCE DURING WET WEATHER EVENTS
ESSENTIAL FOR COMPLIANCE AND ENR
Baltimore City
PERFORMANCE
PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY
W/S: Y
Total
Cost
04/30/2012
BALTIMORE CITY C/O DPW
30
Milestone
Dates
PFA: Y
LARGE
BALTIMORE CITY C/O DPW
30
5
2
BALTIMORE COUNTY DPW
PCW 0195
4
46
PROJECT: MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO IMPROVE
PERFORMANCE DURING WET WEATHER EVENTS
ESSENTIAL FOR COMPLIANCE AND ENR
Baltimore County
PERFORMANCE
30
3
GLEN KELLER
BALTIMORE COUNTY DPW
30
2
Leg/Cong
Project
District River Basin Details
Page 1
VIA. SW Conveyance Infrastructure
VIB. SW Treatment Systems
VIC. Green Infrastructure
VIIJ. NPS: Sanitary Landfills
VIIK. NPS: Hydromodification
O. Other
LOAN INTEREST
PFA (Priority Funding Area) Codes:
PFA: 1 = Categorical Exclusion (e.g. BRF, BNR, etc.)
PFA: 2 = Categorical Exception (No Expansion)
PFA: 3 = Concurrency Review Required
PFA: 4 = Exception Under Review
PFA: 5 = Exception Granted
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Rank/
Points
6
Project Title/
Number/ Population
COLLEGE SO. MD & MT.
CARMEL WOODS WWTPS
UPGRADE
Maryland FINAL Project Priority List for Federal FY2010 & State FY2012
Clean Water Funds (State Revolving Loan/ State Grant)
Project
Description
Applicant Name/
County
PROBLEM: EXISTING WWTPS UNABLE TO MEET
DISCHARGE PERMIT LIMITS - PUMP COMBINED
FLOWS TO MATTAWOMAN WWTP
PCW 0156
POPULATION = 147440
7
TALBOT CO BIOSOLIDS
UTILIZATION FACILITY
UPGRADES
30
PCW 0182
POPULATION =
8
36460
NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL
WW COLLECTION &
TREATMENT P1
PROJECT: DEMOLISH BOTH WWTPS CONSTRUCT 2
PUMP STATIONS, 9,700 LF OF 4" DUCTILE FORCE
MAIN, 20,800 LF OF 8" DIP FORCE MAIN
PROBLEM: FACILITY COMPONENTS NEED
UPGRADE/REPLACEMENT; INADEQUATE
PROCESSING TANK CAPACITY & GREASE
TREATMENT; CO-09-SS-023
PROJECT: IMPROVE SEPTAGE AND GREASE
RECEIVING, TREATMENT AND UTILIZATION OF
STABILIZED MATERIAL; CONSTRUCT GREASE
DEWATERING FACILITY
PROBLEM: FAILING SEPTIC SYSTEMS; 1996 TOWN
OF GOLDSBORO CONSENT ORDER. THIS PROJECT
WILL SERVE 168 EDUS
28
PCW 0089
POPULATION =
32680
CAMBRIDGE WWTP ENR
UPGRADE
10910
W/S: Y
Design
PFA: 2
06/01/2008
AGING
Construction
PUBLIC
07/01/2010
LARGE
06/30/2011
Total
Cost
6,208,190
TALBOT CO
1
02-13-04-04
W/S: Y
Design
PFA: 3
01/01/2009
POCOMOKE CITY ENR
UPGRADE - ADDITIONAL
COSTS
3,100,000
POPULATION =
4098
NEEDS CATEGORY DEFINITIONS:
01
36
02-13-04-04
I. Secondary Treatment
II. Advanced Treatment
IIIA. I/I Correction
3,100,000
10/01/2011
PROJECT: UPGRADE EXISTING 8.1 MGD FACILITY
TO ENR
W/S: N
Design
PFA: 3
07/01/2010
AGING
Construction
PUBLIC
11/01/2011
LARGE
02/28/2013
4,716,000
1
02-13-04-03
I=
(L) 10 IUP
W/S: Y
Design
PFA: 2
12/01/2009
LOAN INTEREST
4,716,000
1,960,000
DISADV.
37
9,339,000
LOAN INTEREST
II =
9,339,000
9,339,000
PUBLIC Construction
LARGE
02/01/2011
DISADV. 02/28/2012
(L) 10 IUP
RUSSELL BLAKE
38B
IIIB. Major Sewer Rehab
IVA. New Collector Sewer
IVB. New Interceptor Sewer
V. Combined Sewer Overflow
I=
(L) 10 IUP
KATHELEEN FREEMAN
GREGORY A. LE BLANC
PROJECT: ADD'L FUNDING NEEDED TO COMPLETE
ENR UPGRADE AT EXISTING 1.47 MGD WWTP; UV
DISINFECTION; SEPTAGE ACCEPTANCE; VALVE
ACTUATORS
LOAN INTEREST
11/30/2012
POCOMOKE CITY
PCW 0158
6,208,190
3,025,000
Talbot County
PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY
30
IVB =
PUBLIC Construction
LARGE
Caroline County
PROBLEM: EXCESS NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY
Cost By
Needs Category
3,104,095
Dorchester County
10
MDE
Funding
(L) 10 IUP
37A
MUN. UTILITIES COM C/O
CAMBRIDGE
POPULATION =
02-14-01-09
RAY CLARKE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCT A LOW PRESSURE SEWER
COLLECTION SYSTEM AND FORCE MAIN TO
CONVEY FLOW TO THE EXISTING WWTP IN
GREENSBORO, MD
30
PCW 0073
5
Milestone
Dates
Charles County
CAROLINE COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
30
9
MELVIN C. BEALL JR, PE
COMMISSIONERS OF
CHARLES CO
30
Leg/Cong
Project
District River Basin Details
Page 2
1
02-13-02-02
W/S: Y
Design
PFA: Y
11/01/2010
500,000
LOAN INTEREST
I=
500,000
500,000
PUBLIC Construction
SMALL
11/01/2010
DISADV. 11/30/2010
(L) 10 IUP
Worcester County
VIA. SW Conveyance Infrastructure
VIB. SW Treatment Systems
VIC. Green Infrastructure
VIIJ. NPS: Sanitary Landfills
VIIK. NPS: Hydromodification
O. Other
LOAN INTEREST
PFA (Priority Funding Area) Codes:
PFA: 1 = Categorical Exclusion (e.g. BRF, BNR, etc.)
PFA: 2 = Categorical Exception (No Expansion)
PFA: 3 = Concurrency Review Required
PFA: 4 = Exception Under Review
PFA: 5 = Exception Granted
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Rank/
Points
11
Project Title/
Number/ Population
Maryland FINAL Project Priority List for Federal FY2010 & State FY2012
Clean Water Funds (State Revolving Loan/ State Grant)
Project
Description
Applicant Name/
County
DENTON WWTP ENR UPGRADE PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY
Leg/Cong
Project
District River Basin Details
SCOTT GETCHELL
W/S: Y
36
TOWN COMMISSIONERS OF
DENTON
30
PCW 0011
POPULATION =
2978
PROJECT: UPGRADE EXISTING 0.8 MGD WWTP TO
ENR
Milestone
Dates
01
Total
Cost
RAILROAD AVE CSO
REMOVAL PROJECT
PROBLEM: COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS CATCH
BASINS TIED INTO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM;
PENDING CONSENT ORDER
PCW 0075
POPULATION =
13
2620
SNOW HILL WWTP ENR
UPGRADE
PROJECT: SEPARATE THE CATCH BASINS FROM THE
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, INSTALL 2,150 LF 12"
NEW STORM DRAIN & TREATMENT SYSTEM
PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY
05/01/2010
(L) 10 IUP
GEORGE E. MAYER, JR
W/S: Y
37
1
POPULATION =
2410
1,300,000
PFA: 2
02-13-03-06
V=
GREENSBORO WWTP
CAPACITY UPGRADE
PUBLIC Construction
SMALL
04/01/2011
LOAN UNWANTED
Caroline County
KELLY BREWINTON
1
PROJECT: UPGRADE EXISTING 0.5 MGD FACILITY
TO ENR
PROBLEM: FAILING SEPTICS IN THE TOWN OF
GOLDSBORO; 1996 GOLDSBORO CONSENT ORDER.
THIS PROJECT WILL SERVE 800 EDUS
02-13-02-02
W/S: Y
Design
PFA: 1
11/30/2009
14,015,224
II = 14,015,224
6,567,210
PUBLIC Construction
SMALL
11/29/2010
DISADV. 05/25/2012
LOAN UNWANTED
PCW 0110
POPULATION =
15
DAVID L. KIBLER
36
TOWN OF GREENSBORO
30
1633
ANNAPOLIS WRF - ENR
UPGRADE
01
PROJECT: EXPAND THE GREENSBORO WWTP AT
.32MGD FROM .28MGD TO TREAT GOLDSBORO'S
FLOW INSTALL NEW SCREENS, FILTERS, UV
RADIATION
Caroline County
PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY
GLENN SHIPLEY
02-13-04-04
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
PCW 0081
GREEN
POPULATION = 519623
(E)
03
PROJECT: UPGRADE EXISTING 13.0 MGD WWTP TO
ENR
W/S: N
Design
PFA: 3
07/01/2011
AGING
Construction
PUBLIC
11/01/2012
SMALL
04/30/2013
02-13-10-02
I. Secondary Treatment
II. Advanced Treatment
IIIA. I/I Correction
IIIB. Major Sewer Rehab
IVA. New Collector Sewer
IVB. New Interceptor Sewer
V. Combined Sewer Overflow
I=
Design
PFA: Y
09/01/2007
3,230,000
730,000
(L) 10 IUP
W/S: Y
26,563,056
LOAN INTEREST
II = 26,563,056
25,932,056
PUBLIC Construction
LARGE
09/01/2010
09/30/2012
(L) 10 IUP
Anne Arundel County
NEEDS CATEGORY DEFINITIONS:
3,230,000
DISADV.
30
29
1,300,000
1,300,000
Worcester County
14
LOAN INTEREST
DISADV. 01/31/2012
TOWN OF SNOW HILL
PCW 0026
6,003,591
DISADV. 05/01/2011
38B
30
II =
PUBLIC Construction
SMALL
TOWN OF FEDERALSBURG
30
Cost By
Needs Category
6,003,591
Caroline County
12
MDE
Funding
6,003,591
PFA: 1
02-13-04-04
Page 3
VIA. SW Conveyance Infrastructure
VIB. SW Treatment Systems
VIC. Green Infrastructure
VIIJ. NPS: Sanitary Landfills
VIIK. NPS: Hydromodification
O. Other
LOAN INTEREST
PFA (Priority Funding Area) Codes:
PFA: 1 = Categorical Exclusion (e.g. BRF, BNR, etc.)
PFA: 2 = Categorical Exception (No Expansion)
PFA: 3 = Concurrency Review Required
PFA: 4 = Exception Under Review
PFA: 5 = Exception Granted
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Rank/
Points
16
Project Title/
Number/ Population
LANDFARE STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT POND
RETROFIT
Maryland FINAL Project Priority List for Federal FY2010 & State FY2012
Clean Water Funds (State Revolving Loan/ State Grant)
Project
Description
Applicant Name/
County
PROBLEM: POND'S BRICK RISER STRUCTURE FAILED DANIEL HARPER
AND IS NO LONGER FUNCTIONING
PCW 0141
POPULATION = 952500
28
PROJECT: REPAIR EMBANKMENT EROSION,
RE-GRADE POND, AND BUILD WEIR CONTROL
STRUCTURE TO MEET CURRENT SWM AND
SAFETY STANDARDS
GARNER/BRANDYWINE SCRAP PROBLEM: ILLEGAL STOCKPILE OF > 1 MILLION
WASTE TIRES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY CLOGGING
TIRE STOCKPILE CLEANUP
STREAM AND A PUBLIC HEALTH RISK (ESP. FROM
FIRE)
PCW 0002
GREEN
POPULATION = 864655
(G)
PROJECT: REMOVE TIERS AND RETURN 5 RAVINES
TO NATURAL STATE, INCLUDING REFORESTATION
AND WETLAND RESTORATION
WETLAND 2
18
HOBBS ROAD LANDFILL;
CLOSURE & CAPPING
PROBLEM: APPROXIMATELY 2,000,000 GAL
LANDFILL LEACHATE IS ENTERING WATER
SYSTEM PER YEAR; CO-07-SW-176
PCW 0173
POPULATION =
32680
PROJECT: BUILD A CLOSURE CAP CONFIGURATION
CONSISTING OF GEOMEMBRANE, GEOCOMPOSITE
DRAINAGE MATERIAL, COVER SOIL MATER, GAS
COLLECT
LINDEN ST CSO ELIMINATION PROBLEM: COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS;
01-C-00-18342L
PROJECT, PHASE VI D&E
02-14-02-05
PCW 0071
POPULATION =
7873
BLUE PLAINS WWTP ENR
PROJECT: ELIMINATE 3 CSO AT SAND SPRING
INTERCEPTOR, GEORGES CREEK PUMPING
STATION AND LAVALE SYSTEM-REPLACE PIPES
PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY
POPULATION = 1361940
Design
04/01/2009
MDE
Funding
271,742
VIB =
PUBLIC Construction
05/01/2011
LOAN UNWANTED
WILLIAM (KEN) LATHROUM
W/S: E
27A
5
8,845,475
PFA: E
MARYLAND ENV. SERVICE
02-13-11-01
VIIK =
I. Secondary Treatment
II. Advanced Treatment
IIIA. I/I Correction
8,845,475
6,720,475
PUBLIC Construction
LARGE
06/01/2009
06/30/2012
(L) 10 IUP
Prince George's County
STEVE TOMCZEWSKI
36
1
02-13-04-04
W/S: E
Design
PFA: E
06/01/2008
3,454,324
LOAN INTEREST
VIIJ =
3,454,324
3,454,324
PUBLIC Construction
LARGE
06/01/2010
DISADV. 07/31/2011
(L) 10 IUP
Caroline County
CHRISTOPHER L. HOVATTER
01B
06
02-14-10-25
Allegany County
W/S: Y
Design
PFA: Y
04/01/2007
AGING
Construction
PUBLIC
10/01/2010
SMALL
10/30/2011
1,590,995
REG
02-14-02-01
VIA. SW Conveyance Infrastructure
VIB. SW Treatment Systems
VIC. Green Infrastructure
VIIJ. NPS: Sanitary Landfills
LOAN INTEREST
V=
1,590,995
500,000
LOAN UNWANTED
DISADV.
ROLAND STEINER
PROJECT: UPGRADE EXISTING 370 MGD WWTP TO
ENR (MARYLAND'S PORTION IS 169.6 MGD)
IIIB. Major Sewer Rehab
IVA. New Collector Sewer
IVB. New Interceptor Sewer
V. Combined Sewer Overflow
271,742
203,807
W/S: Y
Design
PFA: 2
07/01/2009
401,500,000
II = 401,500,000
401,500,000
PUBLIC Construction
LARGE
09/01/2011
12/31/2017
(L) 10 IUP
NEEDS CATEGORY DEFINITIONS:
Cost By
Needs Category
10/30/2011
WSSC
PCW 0062
W/S: E
Total
Cost
Montgomery County
REG
27
Milestone
Dates
PFA: E
LARGE
CITY OF FROSTBURG
28
20
08
MARYLAND
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE
28
19
20
MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEP
28
17
Leg/Cong
Project
District River Basin Details
Page 4
VIIK. NPS: Hydromodification
O. Other
LOAN INTEREST
PFA (Priority Funding Area) Codes:
PFA: 1 = Categorical Exclusion (e.g. BRF, BNR, etc.)
PFA: 2 = Categorical Exception (No Expansion)
PFA: 3 = Concurrency Review Required
PFA: 4 = Exception Under Review
PFA: 5 = Exception Granted
Maryland FINAL Project Priority List for Federal FY2010 & State FY2012
Clean Water Funds (State Revolving Loan/ State Grant)
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Rank/
Points
21
Project Title/
Number/ Population
Project
Description
Applicant Name/
County
PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE N