Establishing secure connection… Loading editor… Preparing document…
Navigation

Fill and Sign the Mental Health Counselling Invoice Template Republic Form

Fill and Sign the Mental Health Counselling Invoice Template Republic Form

How it works

Open the document and fill out all its fields.
Apply your legally-binding eSignature.
Save and invite other recipients to sign it.

Rate template

4.4
57 votes
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT WATER QUALITY REVOLVING LOAN FUND PROGRAM FINAL FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2010 INTENDED USE PLAN July 9, 2010 Prepared By MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION Martin O’Malley Governor Shari T. Wilson Secretary Anthony G. Brown Lt. Governor Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION FINAL Federal Fiscal Year 2010 Intended Use Plan Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................1 A. Sources and Uses of Funds ............................................................................................................................... 3 B. Goals of the Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund (WQRLF or WQSRF) ............................................ 4 C. Project Selection and Fund Activities under the FFY 2010 Intended Use Plan (IUP) ....................................... 6 D. Project Scope of Work/Environmental Benefits - FFY 2010 IUP Projects ..........................................................7 E. Minority Business Enterprises/Women's Business Enterprises (M/WBE) Participation ..................................... 8 F. Assurances ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 G. Binding Commitments and Cash Draw Projections ............................................................................................ 8 H. Public Review of the Final FFY 2010 IUP............................................................................................................ 8 Table 1 - Project List and Sources/Uses of Funds Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Maryland WQSRF Final Project Priority List for FFY 2010 IUP WQSRF Integrated Project Priority System (IPPS) WQSRF Disadvantaged Community Criteria & Funding Allocation Public Hearing Responsiveness Summary Assistant Attorney General Certification MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION FINAL Federal Fiscal Year 2010 Intended Use Plan Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Intended Use Plan (IUP) is the document that the Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration (MWQFA) will submit to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to request the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2010 Capitalization Grant under the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA), to be matched with 20% of State bond/general funds, for use in the Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund (WQRLF or WQSRF). The Maryland WQSRF was established pursuant to the Clean Water Act of 1987 and the Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration Act, Title 9, Subtitle 16 of the Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, to provide below market interest rate loans to local governments and eligible private entities for certain water quality capital projects. The State of Maryland is committed to using the capitalization grant funds for which we are applying to provide assistance to wastewater, nonpoint source, and other eligible green, water or energy efficiency improvements or environmentally innovative (“Green”) projects that will proceed to construction and assist in furthering the water quality objectives of the Clean Water Act, while broadening environmental benefits to the Chesapeake Bay. During FFY 2010, Maryland will be making a grant application to receive $49,279,000 in Federal Capitalization Grant to be matched with $9,855,800 (20%) in State funds. With this 2010 IUP, the MWQFA is requesting the federal (4%) funds or $1,971,160 for WQSRF program administration. The highlights of the Final 2010 IUP are as follows: SOURCES USES Capitalization Grant State (Bond/Gen. Fund) Match (20%) Est. Invest. Earnings/Repayments $ $ $ Total $ 49,279,000 WQSRF Admin. Exp. (up to 4% of grant) 9,855,800 Capital Projects - Loans & Grants 83,000,000 Linked Deposit Program Bank Loans 142,134,800 $ $ $ 1,971,160 140,163,640 - $ 142,134,800 Loan Terms: Applicable to all WQSRF loans except loans through the Linked Deposit Program (See Section B-2 below) Current Interest Rate* Standard Rate = 50% of Market Rate Disadvantaged Community (DAC) Rate = 25% of Market (Market Interest Rate is defined as the average of the Bond Buyer 11-Bond Index for the month preceding the loan closing). * MDE, by policy, can change the SRF loan interest rate at any time. Interest rates are posted on the MWQFA web site. Loan Term Up to 20 Years Loan Origination Fee None Administrative Fee 5% of the aggregate debt service divided by the number of administrative fee payments over the life of the loan, and is collected annually. This amounts to approximately 0.50% (or 50 basis points) increase in the interest rate for a 20-year loan. The administrative fee is to help meet program operating expenses. This is in addition to the any funds provided for WQSRF program expenses from the Federal Capitalization Grant (up to 4% of cap. grant). Table 1 shows the proposed list of projects for inclusion on the FFY 2010 IUP for WQSRF financial assistance. These projects were selected from the Project Priority List based on: (1) The Integrated Project Priority System (IPPS) ranking and (2) Readiness to proceed to construction by December 31, 2011. The IPPS provides higher priority to WWTP upgrades for Biological and Enhanced Nutrient Removal (BNR/ENR) and Combined Sewer Overflow Page 1 (CSO)/Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) rehabilitation projects, located in priority watersheds, that will help attain water quality standards and/or help restore surface water and biological communities. Before loan execution, projects identified in the IUP will undergo a detailed financial/credit analysis by the MWQFA. Please note: Projects that are ranked within the fundable range (1-62), that are not ready to proceed to construction by December 31, 2011, will be bypassed by other projects on the waiting list and PPL that are able to proceed to construction and will meet MDE’s programmatic requirements. Waiting list and PPL project applicants that are able to meet both requirements are encouraged to contact MDE to discuss potential funding. Page 2 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION Federal Fiscal Year 2010 Intended Use Plan Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund A. Sources and Uses of Funds A comprehensive summary of WQSRF Sources and Uses of funds are as follows: As of 6/30/2010 Sources: Thru 2009 IUP Federal Capitalization Grants Federal Stimulus Grant State Match Total Bond Proceeds Investment Earnings (Thru FY 09) Loan Principal Repayments (Thru FY 09) Loan Interest Repayments (Thru FY 09) Subtotal $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 651,823,624 a 94,784,600 130,373,000 b 213,360,882 c 131,048,504 438,758,784 180,067,827 1,840,217,221 $ $ $ $ 49,279,000 9,855,800 - $ 59,134,800 $ $ $ $ $58,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 69,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,000,000 5,000,000 68,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 98,000,000 $ 1,909,217,221 $ 157,134,800 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,272,686,770 149,328,418 180,553,641 10,634,580 120,224,875 116,684,452 11,902,094 2,000,000 12,412,454 658,322 23,000,000 1,909,217,221 Estimated Loan Principal (10) Estimated Loan Interest Repayments (10) Investment Earnings (10) Estimated Loan Principal (11) Estimated Loan Interest Repayments (11) Investment Earnings (11) Subtotal Total Sources Uses: Loan Agreements Entered (6.30.09) Projects on IUPs with loans pending as of June 30, 2009 Projects Stimulus on 08 IUP with loans & grants pending Loan agreements including Stimulus (5.15.10) Funds Transferred to Drinking Water SRF (98/99 IUPs) Bond Principal Repaid Bond Interest Expense Bond Debt Service Reserve Stimulus Administrative Expense 4% Administrative Expensed 4% Administrative Expense/Reserve Allocated for Non-point Source Projects – Linked Deposit Total Uses a b 2010 IUP 2009 IUP $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 140,163,640 11,000,000 4,000,000 1,971,160 157,134,800 Total awards through 2009 Capitalization Grant Includes State General/Bond Fund match of $3.29 million for FFY 2009 IUP (anticipated July 2010) Page 3 B. Goals of the Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund 1. • Long-Term Goals Fund Perpetuity & Utilization - To utilize the total financial resources of the Fund by providing low interest rate financing while maintaining a perpetual source of capital funds for future water quality projects. The goal is to achieve a fund utilization rate (loans executed/total funds available) of 90% or greater. This is a Program Activity Measure (PAM) under EPA’s strategic plan for the WQSRF. For FY 2010, MWQFA is projecting WQSRF fund utilization rate of 90%. The WQSRF could finance approximately $790 million in additional loans from capitalization grants, State match, loan repayments, and investment earnings between FFY 2010 and FFY 2014 IUPs (see graph below). This is in addition to the $1.74 billion capacity on existing IUPs (1989 - 2009). This analysis takes into account stimulus funds, existing and anticipated investment earnings, loan repayments and assumes Maryland’s share of future Federal Capitalization Grant of minimum $49 million per year (based on federal appropriation of $2.1 billion/yr). The cumulative loan capacity of the WQSRF is projected to be ~$2.4 billion by FFY 2014. Maryland WQSRF Funding Projection 2,500 2,023 1,873 1,743 2,000 $ MILLION 2,392 2,183 1,500 1,000 500 141 130 150 160 209 0 10 11 IUP YEAR Annual IUP Capacity 12 12 14 Cumulative Loan Capacity • Funding Prioritization - Using the WQSRF updated program (January 2010) Integrated Project Priority System (IPPS) rating and ranking system, target financial assistance to projects that help meet the State’s nutrient (nitrogen & phosphorous) reduction objectives, restore surface water quality, and restore biological integrity within priority water bodies. The IPPS focuses on targeted watersheds, water quality restoration and biological integrity to protect public health and achieve compliance with discharge permits. • Reasonable User and Project Unit Cost - To ensure facilities are constructed and maintained at a reasonable cost for the users of the system. To this end, MWQFA will continue to provide Disadvantaged Communities a lower interest rate. For projects that have high unit cost per household, the MWQFA will continue to coordinate its State grant programs with other Federal/State financial assistance programs (e.g., USDA Rural Utilities Service, Community Development Block Grant, Federal Special Appropriation grants) that provide approximately $15 million/year for water/sewerage system improvements in Maryland. • Financial Capacity & Disadvantaged Community Assistance - As part of the credit/financial analysis of potential borrowers, the MWQFA will continue to provide financial advisory services to system owners on the feasibility of their user rate structure and financial capacity to pay back a loan. The MWQFA financial model forecasts future operating cash flows based on existing/proposed user rates using audited financial statements. The model has been an effective tool to assist communities in developing affordable user rate structures and in determining additional subsidies to disadvantaged communities. Page 4 2. Short-term Goals/FFY2010 IUP Operating Goals • Finance Advanced Treatment at WWTPs for Nutrient Reduction - To provide low-cost financing to local governments, in tandem with the Maryland’s Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR) grants, to upgrade targeted wastewater treatment facilities with advanced treatment to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus discharges as part of the Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Reduction Goals. Maryland’s far-reaching legislation (Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund), which was signed into law in 2004 to address Bay restoration, created a dedicated fund for upgrading the 67 largest wastewater treatment plants to Enhanced Nutrient Reduction (ENR) standards. This ENR upgrade is expected to reduce 7.5 million pounds of nitrogen and 260,000 pounds of phosphorus from entering into the Bay each year. This represents over one-third of Maryland’s commitment under the 2000 Chesapeake Bay Agreement. ENR projects are expected to receive up to 100% state grants for ENR eligible components. Some non-eligible ENR components can be covered by the WQSRF. See Table 1 for ENR projects identified for funding in the FFY 2010 IUP. • Community & Utility Sustainability - To provide low-cost capital financing to local governments to address needed wastewater improvements that are necessary to maintain reliable facility operation and maintenance. The FFY 2010 IUP, Table 1, identifies several projects needing secondary upgrades, studies, replacement, and rehabilitation for WQSRF funding. In addition, MWQFA continues to work closely with facilities owners and operators to undertake fiscal capacity management. Most of the credit capacity analysis includes detailed discussions with potential loan recipients to ensure that enterprise funds become fiscally solvent. Fiscal solvency includes reliable and dedicated sources of revenue and consideration to future activities such as O&M, replacement and capital costs. MWQFA is also engaged in a collaborative effort with EPA to provide additional support to projects that are supportive of sustainable development, green infrastructure, energy efficiency, and environmental innovation. See Table 1 for projects identified for funding within this category. • Green Infrastructure, Water and Energy Efficiency and Environmental Innovation Projects: The State of Maryland has made a concerted effort to actively solicit “Green” projects to be included in the FFY 2010 IUP for funding to help restore Maryland’s tidal and non-tidal water resources as part of the larger goal of Chesapeake Bay restoration. Green projects are integral to the innovative approach Maryland has taken through the Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategies to address water quality issues throughout the Maryland portion of the Bay watershed. With the federal funds, Maryland is focusing on water resource restoration, protection, conservation, and innovative and energy efficient projects. The projects include living shorelines (innovative techniques incorporating vegetative planting to protect shorelines while creating valuable tidal habitat); stream, riparian and floodplain ecosystem restoration using methods that utilize native planting, and naturally occurring rocks and boulders; wetlands creation and restoration; biofiltration, and primarily other similar non-structural projects. Table 1 highlights a total of $10,212,418 or 21% of the 2010 Capitalization grant to “green reserve.” Additional subsidy for green projects is based on funding eligibility (Appendix C). • Additional Subsidization and Eligible Recipients: Table 1 highlights a total of $16,020,052 or 33% of the 2010 Capitalization grant allocated to comply with the additional subsidization requirements related to the federal 2010 Appropriation Act, which authorizes the federal 2010 Capitalization Grant. Disadvantaged Community (DAC) applicants (both green and non-green) may receive up to 87.5% of the project cost as grant or loan forgiveness not to exceed $1.5 million (no cap for Green Reserve) based upon the DAC criteria below: 1. Water (or sewer, as applicable) user rate/year per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) > 1% of Community Median Household Income (MHI); or 2. Project is physically located and benefits an MDE approved Environmental Benefit District; or 3. Project is physically located and benefits a community with MHI less than 70% of State MHI In addition to above, a. Where the water (or sewer, as applicable) user rate would increase by more than 20% to achieve financial capacity (as determined by MDE), the Owner may qualify for up to 25% of the loan amount as loan-forgiveness, not to exceed $1.5 million b. Any non DAC applicant undertaking an eligible non-point source, green infrastructure, water or energy efficiency improvement or environmental innovation project that does not have a dedicated source of revenue, such as a user charge system to repay a loan is eligible to receive up to 50% of the project costs as grant. Visit the following link below for MDE’s funding eligibility (Appendix C): http://www.mde.state.md.us/assets/document/Grant_Funding_Grid.pdf Page 5 • Finance Non-Point Source (NPS) Projects – Linked Deposit (LD): Continue funding of Privately Owned Nonpoint Source Projects using the LD Program. Since private entities do not receive a formal mail solicitation to apply for WQSRF loans as local governments do, information regarding the WQSRF LD Program is provided through a cooperative effort between Department of Natural Resources, Department of Agriculture, Local Soil Conservation Districts, Local Health Departments, and Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE). Information on the LD Program is also available on the MWQFA website. The MWQFA has previously allocated $23 million of recycled funds (investment earnings/repayments) for eligible private NPS projects to be funded on a first come first served basis using the LD Program. Based on demand, MWQFA is not requesting new funds for Linked Deposit activity with the FFY 2010 IUP. The LD Program is a mechanism that provides below market rate of interest loans to private entities for eligible NPS projects through a network of private lending institutions. For example, a landowner with an approved Best Management Practices (BMP) may apply to one of the network of banks for financing at a below market rate of interest. The lender (bank) will evaluate the credit-worthiness of the borrower and if acceptable will apply to the MWQFA for an investment agreement equal to the loan amount and term. Under the FFY 2010 IUP, the investment agreement with banks will require an investment return equal to the MWQFA standard interest rate on WQSRF loans rather than the market (CD) rate. The interest rate difference will be passed down, as a subsidy, by the bank to the borrower. This MWQFA investment agreement is “Linked” to the below market rate of interest loan by the bank to the borrower. The loan agreement is between the bank and the borrower, and as such, the bank assumes all risk of default. C. Project Selection and Fund Activities under the FFY 2010 IUP Financial Assistance Applications for water quality projects were solicited in December 2009 through January 29, 2010 from local governments by the MWQFA to develop the Maryland Project Priority List (PPL). Project applications were rated and ranked based on the Integrated Project Priority System and identified in the PPL for Federal FY 2010 and State FY 2012 Clean Water Funds. This PPL was used to select projects for the FFY 2010 IUP. Applicants with projects identified on the PPL that ranked from number 1 through 62, that meet the readiness-to-proceed to construction before December 2011, and where the applicants responded positively to pursuing a WQSRF loan are included in the FFY 2010 IUP. Projects that are ranked 1-62, that are not ready to proceed to construction by 12/31/11, will be bypassed with PPL projects. Projects that are bypassed are encouraged to reapply during the next funding cycle. Table 1 shows the list of proposed projects, priority ranking and scoring, and the total fund sources and uses under the FFY 2010 IUP. It highlights WQSRF admin fees and loan projects using Federal Capitalization Grant funds of $49,279,000 matched with $9,855,800 in State general funds for a total of $59,134,800. Table 1 also highlights nonfederal funds for capital projects totaling $83,000,000. Table 1A shows the federal equivalency projects. The 4% of Federal Capitalization Grant amount $1,971,160 may be utilized for WQSRF administrative expenses, as follows (see table 2 for breakdown of 4% costs). Table 2 Indirect Costs Item Salary and Fringe Indirect Overhead (25.74%) Contractor Fees Travel/Training Office Supplies Office Equipment Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Est. $ Amount 1,552,112 399,514 12,000 3,351 4,182 1,971,160 % of Total 78.74% 20.27% 0.00% 0.61% 0.17% 0.21% 100.00% Notes Computers and Equipment Page 6 Administrative Costs: Up to a total of $1,971,160 may be used for CWSRF program administration (4% administrative costs). Additional breakdown of the 4% costs noted above include • Travel and training costs of $12,000 will be broken down in the following areas; o 3 staff @ $1,500 each for a total of $4,500 to attend annual CIFA conference (Out of state Travel) o 5 staff @ $500 each for a total of $2,500 to attend professional training courses & EPA training o 3 staff @$1,000 each for a total of $3,000 to attend annual SRF Region 3 All States meeting o 4 staff @ $500 each for a total of $2,000 to attend other required meetings (need surveys, CBR/PBR, etc,) • Office supplies costs of $3,351 will be used to purchase computers, peripherals, and paper supply, etc., • Office equipment cost of $4,182 will be used to purchase furniture for new staff CWSRF Loan Guarantees – For projects on the FFY 2010 waiting list (below the direct loan funding line), MWQFA will consider providing loan guarantees as security for payment of debt service on locally issued debt, if this provides the applicant material financing costs savings. Program Income (Non Federal Funds) The MWQFA charges loan fees equal to 5% of annual debt service, which are used for administrative expenses in addition to the 4% setaside. The details related to the program income and uses are provided each year in the annual report. In SFY 2010 and 2009, fee revenues were $3.49 million & $3.53 million, respectively, while expenses were $3.35 million and $3. 7 million (projected), respectively. In SFY 2011, the expected fee revenues of $3.6 million. D. Project Scope of Work/Environmental Benefits – FFY 2010 IUP Projects The following are examples of the type of projects selected for financial assistance in the FFY 2010 IUP. The detailed Environmental Benefits Reporting (EPA one-pager) for each Section 212 project below will also be provided in the annual report to EPA. In addition, any 319 project funded through the direct loan program and Linked Deposit projects will be identified in the one-pagers by specific categories as part of the annual report. • This Anne Arundel County Cox Creek Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR) Upgrade project (Rank 5/30) consists of construction of Single-Stage Membrane Bioreactors to achieve the ENR effluent goals of 3.0 mg/L Total Nitrogen (TN) and 0.3 mg/L Total Phosphorus (TP). At the existing 15 mgd capacity, the ENR upgrade will reduce the TN load to the Chesapeake Bay by 228,417 lbs/year and the TP load to the Bay by 77,662 lbs. /year. Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan will be utilized for improvements that are ineligible or only partially eligible for ENR grant, including: modifications to the primary clarifiers; grit effluent channels and Parshall Flume; replacement of primary sludge pumps; high flow management treatment system; gravity thickening; scum handling; and piping. This WRF is owned by Anne Arundel County and consists of approximately 207,849 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs). • This City of Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Plant Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR) Upgrade project (Rank 9/30) involves planning, design and construction of ENR facilities at the existing 8.0 million gallons per day (mgd) facility. Upon completion, effluent concentration goals of 3 mg/l for Total Nitrogen (TN) and 0.3 mg/l for Total Phosphorus (TP) will be achieved and nutrient loads to the Chesapeake Bay will be reduced by 123,345 lbs /year of TN and 41,937 lbs/year of TP. Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan and Loan Forgiveness will be utilized for improvements that are ineligible or only partially eligible for ENR grant, including: a primary clarifier; gravity sludge thickener, solids dewatering, and miscellaneous modifications to the existing process. This facility is owned by City of Cambridge and is a disadvantaged community consisting of approximately 4,364 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs). • This Garner Brandywine Scrap Tire Stockpile Cleanup Project (Rank 17/28) undertaken by Maryland Environmental Services responds to a Departmental enforcement action to clean up over one million illegally dumped tires in a ravine located in Prince George’s County. Along with removing the tires, the project will Page 7 also restore 8,446 linear feet of waterway. The “green” portion of the project will restore intermittent stream channels, 1.5 acres of nontidal wetland and 6.3 acres of wetland transition areas. • This Anne Arundel County Broadwater Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR) Upgrade project (Rank 22/27) consists of planning, design and construction of ENR facilities (Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) technology) at the existing 2.0 million gallons per day (mgd) facility. The planning phase will include trials to determine the most appropriate technology to achieve the ENR effluent goals of 3.0 mg/L Total Nitrogen (TN) and 0.3 mg/L Total Phosphorus (TP). Upon completion, the ENR upgrade will nutrient loads to the Chesapeake Bay by 30,456 lbs/year and the TP load to the Bay by 10,355 lbs. per year. Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan will be utilized for improvements that are ineligible or only partially eligible for ENR grant. “Green” loan and grant will be utilized for equipment fitted with high efficiency motors and variable frequency drives. This WRF is owned by Anne Arundel County and consists of approximately 207,849 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs). • This Potomac Heights Stormwater Improvement Project is a “green” project to be cost-shared between the Potomac Heights Mutual Home Owners Association (Rank 50/25) and the Charles County Commissioners (Rank 51/25) to address inadequately designed stormwater conveyance in the Potomac Heights neighborhood. The joint project will focus on a stormwater drainage area of 77 acres and will restore 18,984 linear feet of existing drainage ditches, storm drains and roads that have gone into disrepair. Along with stormwater conveyance improvements, the project will also add one wet pond to the area to collect and treat runoff without having a major impact on the community or surrounding environment. • This Rhode River Living Shoreline Project (Rank 53/26) undertaken by the Chesapeake Bay Trust is a “green” project to address a rapidly eroding shoreline in Chester Point at the confluence of the Rhode and West Rivers. This project will protect 1,500 linear feet of shoreline using a combination of stone breakwaters, sand planting platforms, low marsh and high marsh plantings. These techniques will create 3.5 acres of new wetland and benefit many species that inhabit the local waters. E. Minority Business Enterprises/Women’s Business Enterprises (M/WBE) Participation On October 30, 2009, EPA advised MDE of the M/WBE “fair share” utilization requirements for FFY 2009 through 2012. EPA approved MDE’s previously existing goals for another three years (until September 30, 2012) since the study used for those numbers was less than ten years old. The M/WBE goals for the SRF programs are a total of 22% and by category as: “construction” (11% MBE and 11% WBE), “services” (12% MBE and 10% WBE), “supplies” (11% MBE and 11% WBE), and “equipment” (11% MBE and 11% WBE). These goals will be applicable to loans using Federal Capitalization Grant and State matching funds. The MDE’s Water Management Administration provides borrowers an “Insert” for inclusion in procurement/bid documents, which outlines the M/WBE (%) goals and the affirmative/positive steps necessary to show a good faith effort consistent with federal regulations under 40 CFR Part 31.36(e). Failure to meet the M/WBE goals does not preclude the use of the SRF, as long as the good faith effort can be demonstrated and documented. It is important that the loan recipients and their prime contractors undertake the necessary affirmative/positive steps to assure that M/WBE firms are afforded opportunity to participate in SRF projects. M/WBE Program details and forms are available on MDE’s web site at www.mde.state.md.us. F. Assurances The Department agrees to comply with the Federal program requirements as outlined in the Operating Agreement between EPA and MDE dated November 5, 1997 with amendments August 21, 1998 and March18, 2008. G. Binding Commitments and Cash Draw Projections The projected binding commitments/federal payment schedule and total cash draw projections are shown on Table 1. H. Public Review of the Final FFY 2010 IUP Applicants that submitted Financial Assistance Applications were sent an e-mail providing the Draft FFY 2010 IUP project list and informing them on the availability of the Draft IUP/PPL on MDE’s website on Friday May 14, 2010. This Final FFY 2010 IUP was the subject of a public hearing on Friday June 18, 2010 at 10:00 AM at the Maryland Page 8 Department of Environment (Terra Conference Room, 1st Floor Lobby), 1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland, 21230. The public hearing record was closed on June 25, 2010. Comments on the FFY 2010 IUP were submitted via e-mail, fax, and mail and/or in person at the public hearing. All comments are included in the responsiveness summary (Appendix D). MDE will respond to those who submitted comments at the public hearing requesting certain actions. Page 9 Page 1 of 4 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION FFY 2010 FINAL INTENDED USE PLAN MARYLAND WATER QUALITY REVOLVING LOAN FUND CAP GRANT $ 49,279,000 Admin $ 1,971,160 Table 1: WQSRF PROJECT LIST $ 142,134,800 Capital Projects $ State Match $ 9,855,800 Investments/Interest $ 15,000,000 Loan % New Repayments $ 68,000,000 $ $ 140,163,640 Total Funding APPLICANT COUNTY PROJECT NAME 47,307,840 IUP Categories Loan Forg.% 120,178,247 $ 9,772,976 86% Green Loan % $ 3,965,342 20% Green Grant % $ 6,247,076 8% 13% TOTAL FFY '10 CW CW CW CW PRIORITY SCORING CONST. COST ($) REQUEST($) LOAN Loan Forg. GREEN LOAN Green Grant RANK POINTS START Baltimore County DPW Baltimore Patapsco WWTP ENR Modification - Contract (SC855) $ 6,919,000 $ 6,919,000 $ 3,300,000 $ - $ - $ - 1 30 Jul-10 ENR Funding Baltimore County DPW Baltimore Patapsco WWTP BNR Contract (SC845) $ 34,779,740 $ 34,779,740 $ 16,000,000 $ - $ - $ - 2 30 Jun-10 ENR Funding Baltimore City CO DPW Baltimore City Patapsco WWTP BNR Contract (SC845) $ 168,183,259 $ 16,366,936 $ 11,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - 3 30 Jun-10 ENR Funding Baltimore City CO DPW Baltimore City Patapsco WWTP ENR Modification - Contract (SC855) $ 32,256,000 $ 3,256,000 $ 2,442,000 $ 814,000 $ - $ - 4 30 Jul-10 ENR Funding Anne Arundel County Anne Arundel Cox Creek WRF - ENR Upgrade $ 162,644,880 $ 159,270,827 $ 9,109,333 $ - $ - $ - 5 30 Feb-10 ENR/Previous IUP Funding Charles Co. Commissioners Charles College So MD & Mt Carmel Woods WWTPs Upgrade $ 6,208,190 $ 3,104,095 $ 3,000,000 $ - $ - $ - 6 30 Jul-10 Talbot County Talbot Talbot Co. Biosolids Utilization Facility Upgrades $ 3,100,000 $ 3,025,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 7 30 Oct-11 PFA Issues Caroline County Commissioners Caroline North County Regional WW Collection & Treatment PI $ 4,716,000 $ 1,960,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 8 30 Nov-11 Water & Sewer & PFA Issues Mun. Utilities Com. C/O Cambridge Dorchester Cambridge WWTP ENR Upgrade $ 9,339,000 $ 9,339,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - 9 30 Feb-11 ENR Funding Pocomoke City Worcester Pocomoke City ENR Upgrade - Additional Costs $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 62,500 $ 437,500 $ - $ - 10 30 Nov-10 ENR Funding Town Comm. Of Denton Caroline Denton WWTP ENR Upgrade $ 6,003,591 $ 6,003,591 $ 59,961 $ 417,324 $ - $ - 11 30 May-10 ENR Funding Town of Federalsburg Caroline Railroad Ave CSO Removal Project $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 12 30 Apr-11 Not Intersted in Loan; other State Funding Town of Snow Hill Worcester Snow Hill WWTP BNR/ENR Upgrade $ 14,015,224 $ 6,567,210 $ - $ - $ - $ - 13 30 Nov-10 Previous IUP Town of Greensboro Caroline Greensboro WWTP Capacity Upgrade $ 3,230,000 $ 730,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 14 30 Nov-12 Water & Sewer & PFA Issues; Late Start Anne Arundel County Anne Arundel Annapolis WRF - ENR Upgrade $ 26,563,056 $ 25,932,056 $ $ - $ 15 29 Sep-10 ENR Funding; Green (E) Montgomery County DEP Montgomery Landfare Stormwater Management Pond Retrofit $ 271,742 $ 203,807 $ $ - 16 28 May-11 Not Intersted in Loan MES Prince George's Garner/Brandywine Scrap Tire Stockpile Cleanup $ 8,845,475 $ 6,720,475 $ 5,852,975 $ Green (G) MES Caroline Hobbs Road Landfill Closure & Capping $ 3,454,324 $ 3,454,324 $ 2,590,743 $ 12,500,000 7,000,000 - 863,581 166,704 $ $ $ 433,750 $ 17 28 Jun-09 - $ - 18 28 Jun-10 Allegany Linden St. CSO Eliminiation Project Phase VI D&E $ 1,590,995 $ 500,000 WSSC Regional Blue Plains WWTP ENR $ 401,500,000 $ 401,500,000 $ Anne Arundel County Anne Arundel Broadneck WRF - ENR Upgrade $ 25,370,290 $ 24,772,194 $ $ - $ 351,074 $ Anne Arundel County Anne Arundel Broadwater WRF ENR Upgrade $ 13,089,500 $ 12,415,970 $ 5,000,000 $ - $ 95,458 $ Anne Arundel County Anne Arundel Maryland City WRF - ENR Upgrade $ 8,757,161 $ 8,214,455 $ 4,067,818 $ - $ 155,382 Anne Arundel County Anne Arundel Patuxent WRF - ENR Upgrade $ 19,665,251 $ 19,192,914 $ 5,000,000 $ - $ 432,500 Washinton Co. Dept Engineer Services Washington Winebrenner WWTP ENR Upgrade $ 17,665,200 $ 17,447,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Washinton Co. Dept Engineer Services Washington Conococheague WWTP ENR Upgrade & Expansion $ 36,038,200 $ 36,038,200 Board of Commissioners Cecil County Cecil Rock Run Sewer Extension $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ St. Mary's Met. Comm. St. Mary's Marlay-Taylor WRF ENR Upgrade $ 13,157,360 $ 13,157,360 $ 7,894,416 - $ City of Frostburg - 166,704 433,750 $ - $ - $ - 19 28 Oct-10 Not Interested in Loan; other State funding $ - $ - $ - 20 27 Sep-11 ENR Funding 351,074 21 27 Jan-11 ENR Funding; Green (E)/Previous IUP 95,458 22 27 Feb-11 ENR Funding; Green (E) $ 155,382 23 27 Jan-11 ENR Funding; Green (E) $ 432,500 24 27 Jan-11 ENR Funding; Green (E) - 25 27 Jun-12 ENR Funding; Late Start $ - 26 27 Oct-11 ENR/Previous IUP Funding $ - 27 27 Mar-11 Water & Sewer & PFA Issues - $ - 28 27 Jun-10 ENR Funding ENR/Previous IUP Funding Calvert Co. Board of Commissioners Calvert Chesapeake Beach WWTP ENR/Expansion - Calvert Co. $ 3,288,314 $ 3,281,738 $ - $ - $ - $ - 29 27 Apr-11 Town of Chesapeake Beach Calvert Chesapeake Beach WWTP ENR/Expansion - Chesapeake $ 13,444,674 $ 13,429,560 $ - $ - $ - $ - 30 27 Apr-11 ENR/Previous IUP Funding Town of North Beach Calvert Chesapeake Beach WWTP ENR/Expansion - Town of Nor $ 2,800,010 $ 2,800,010 $ - $ - $ - $ - 31 27 Apr-11 ENR/Previous IUP Funding Somerset Co. Sanitary District Somerset Tylertown WWTP Upgrade $ 482,000 $ 482,000 $ 45,187 $ 15,063 $ - $ - 32 27 Oct-10 Other State Funding Mayor & City Council of Cumberland Allegany Cumberland CSO Improvements, Phase IB (C&O CA) $ 19,319,000 $ 19,319,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - 33 27 Nov-10 Phased/Other State Funding City of Cumberland Allegany Cumberland CSO Storage Facility WWTP No. 01-10-WWT$ 24,200,000 $ 23,800,000 $ Late start City of Cumberland Allegany Evitts Creek CSO Upgrades Phase 3 Gravity Sewer 8,510,000 $ 8,410,000 $ 6,910,000 $ 1,500,000 712,500 $ 237,500 $ City of Cumberland Allegany Cedar Steet/Rt. 51 Crossing Combined Sewer $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ WSSC Prince George's Parkway WWTP ENR $ 19,645,000 $ 19,645,000 $ Corporation of Westminster Carroll Westminster WWTP ENR $ 26,940,000 $ 26,940,000 $ City of Aberdeen Harford Aberdeen ENR Upgrade $ 26,328,825 $ 1,500,000 $ Commissioners of Thurmont Frederick Thurmont WWTP ENR Upgrade $ 8,993,000 $ 6,000,000 $ - 5,044,000 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - 34 27 Apr-12 $ - $ - 35 27 Dec-11 $ - $ - 36 27 Feb-11 $ - $ - $ - 37 27 Aug-10 Not Interested in Loan; ENR Funding $ - $ - $ - 38 27 Aug-11 ENR Funding/Phased $ - $ - $ - 39 27 Feb-10 Not Interested in Loan; ENR Funding $ - $ - $ - 40 27 Jun-10 ENR Funding Page 2 of 4 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION FFY 2010 FINAL INTENDED USE PLAN MARYLAND WATER QUALITY REVOLVING LOAN FUND CAP GRANT $ 49,279,000 Admin $ 1,971,160 Table 1: WQSRF PROJECT LIST $ 142,134,800 Capital Projects $ State Match $ 9,855,800 Investments/Interest $ 15,000,000 Loan % New Repayments $ 68,000,000 $ $ 140,163,640 Total Funding APPLICANT COUNTY PROJECT NAME 47,307,840 IUP Categories Loan Forg.% 120,178,247 $ 9,772,976 86% Green Loan % $ 3,965,342 20% Green Grant % $ 6,247,076 8% 13% TOTAL FFY '10 CW CW CW CW PRIORITY SCORING CONST. COST ($) REQUEST($) LOAN Loan Forg. GREEN LOAN Green Grant RANK POINTS START Town of Emmitsburg Frederick Emmitsburg WWTP ENR Upgrade $ 15,300,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 2,500,000 $ Town of Westernport Allegany Westernport CSO Elimination - Philos Ave Area $ 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 175,000 $ WSSC Prince George's Western Branch WWTP ENR $ 74,000,000 $ 74,000,000 $ - $ Balto Co. Bureau Solid Waste Mgmt Baltimore Hernwood Landfill Leachate Seep Collection $ 2,275,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ Balto Co. Bureau Solid Waste Mgmt Baltimore Hernwood Landfill Groundwater Remediation $ 2,200,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - Talbot County Talbot Renewable Energy for Tilghman Island WWTP $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ Salisbury Public Works Wicomico Salisbury Sewer Lateral Rehab $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ $ - $ - 41 27 Aug-11 $ - $ - 42 27 Nov-10 - $ - $ - 43 26 Aug-10 ENR/Previous IUP Funding - $ - $ - 44 26 Mar-12 Late Start $ - $ - $ - 45 26 Mar-12 Late Start - $ - $ 46 26 Oct-11 Green (E) - $ - $ 47 26 Sep-10 Not Interested in Loan 48 26 Oct-11 Green (E) 49 25 Jun-11 City of Fruitland Wicomico Fruitland ENR Sludge Handling Project $ 1,767,315 $ 1,767,315 $ 220,914 $ Montgomery County DEP Montgomery Gudelsky Stormwater Mgmt. Pond Retrofit $ 1,100,503 $ 825,377 $ 825,377 $ 1,225,000 707,651 $ 300,000 104,844 $ $ $ 300,000 733,906 - ENR/Previous IUP Funding Potomac Hgts Mutual Home Owners Charles Potomac Heights SWM Imps-Potomac Heights HOAShare $ 2,521,983 $ 2,371,980 $ - $ - $ 1,260,992 $ 1,260,992 50 25 Nov-10 Green (G) Charles Co. Commissioners Charles Potomac Heights SWM BMPS - Charles County Share $ 739,280 $ 369,640 $ - $ - $ 369,640 $ 369,640 51 25 Nov-10 Green (G) Chester Harbor Prop. Owners Assoc Queen Anne's Chester Harbor Property Owners Assoc $ 336,964 $ 336,964 $ - $ - $ - $ 11,172 52 25 Jul-11 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Chesapeake Bay Trust Anne Arundel Rhode River Living Shorline $ 1,230,000 $ 1,185,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 615,000 53 25 Oct-11 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) City of Salisbury Wicomico Waverly Drive WQ Storm Drain Inlets $ 967,680 $ 967,680 $ - $ 54 25 Apr-11 725,760 $ 241,920 $ - City of Salisbury Wicomico Brewington Branch Drainage and WQ Improvements $ 232,500 $ 232,500 $ 9,063 $ 63,438 $ 20,000 $ 140,000 55 25 Sep-10 Town of Sharptown Wicomico Sharptown WWTP Replacement Existing Pump Station $ 555,020 $ 480,700 $ 130,700 $ - $ 175,000 $ 175,000 56 25 Oct-10 Green (G) Green (E) Chesapeake Rivers Assoc. Inc. Anne Arundel Cabin Branch Stormwater Restoration $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 325,000 57 24 Oct-10 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Chesapeake Bay Trust Anne Arundel Camp Letts Stormwater Wetland $ 163,000 $ 158,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 81,500 58 24 Dec-11 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Talbot County Talbot Hyde Park Sewer Extension $ 2,046,450 $ 2,031,450 $ - $ - $ 37,500 $ 37,500 59 24 Nov-10 Green (E) Talbot County Talbot Talbot Trailer Park Sewer Extension $ 1,482,600 $ 1,472,600 $ - $ - $ 37,500 $ 37,500 60 24 Nov-10 Green (E) Talbot County Talbot Talbot County Community Sewer Extension Project $ 1,992,500 $ 1,967,500 $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 25,000 61 24 Nov-10 Green (E) Chesapeake River Assoc. Inc. Anne Arundel Clements Creek Confluence Bog $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ $ 500,000 62 24 Oct-10 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) $ 6,247,076 $ 120,178,247 $ $ 9,772,976 $ - 3,965,342 Additional Subsidy Required $ 7,380,430 Green Reserve Required $ 9,855,800 Additional Subsidy Achieved $ 16,020,052 Green Reserve Achieved $ 10,212,418 Waitng List & PPL Projects If projects identified for funding are not ready to proceed to construction by 12/31/2011, projects from the Project Priority List (PPL) will be selected based on readiness to proceed. Waiting list/PPL projects that were not selected for funding, but are able to proceed to construction by 12/31/211 are encouraged to contact MDE loan officers for potential funding. Projects that are listed with zero dollars were either not interested in loans or did not respond to loan interest letter. Future loan interest can only be accommodated based on funding availability. Page 3 of 4 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION FFY 2010 FINAL INTENDED USE PLAN MARYLAND WATER QUALITY REVOLVING LOAN FUND CAP GRANT $ 49,279,000 Admin $ 1,971,160 Table 1: WQSRF PROJECT LIST $ 142,134,800 Capital Projects $ State Match $ 9,855,800 Investments/Interest $ 15,000,000 Loan % New Repayments $ 68,000,000 $ $ 140,163,640 Total Funding APPLICANT COUNTY PROJECT NAME 47,307,840 IUP Categories Loan Forg.% 120,178,247 $ Green Loan % 9,772,976 86% $ Green Grant % 3,965,342 20% $ 6,247,076 8% 13% TOTAL FFY '10 CW CW CW CW PRIORITY SCORING CONST. COST ($) REQUEST($) LOAN Loan Forg. GREEN LOAN Green Grant RANK POINTS START GREEN WAITING LIST City of Crisfield Somerset Crisfield Wind Turbine Power for the WWTP $ 4,810,000 $ 4,810,000 $ - $ - $ 625,300 $ 4,184,700 76 23 Oct-11 Green (E) Montgomery County DEP Montgomery Aspen Hill Library LID Retrofit $ 154,539 $ 115,904 $ - $ - $ 77,270 $ 77,270 77 22 Sep-10 Green (G) Montgomery County DEP Montgomery Kensington Park Library LID Retrofit Project $ 180,383 $ 135,287 $ - $ - $ - $ 90,192 78 22 Sep-10 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Baltimore County DEP Baltimore Essex Skypark Shoreline Enhancement $ 1,300,000 $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 79 22 Dec-10 Anne Arundel County DPW Anne Arundel Ruppert Ravine Phase 2 $ 714,000 $ 535,500 $ - $ - $ 357,000 $ 357,000 80 22 Howard County DPW Howard Hitech Road Stream Stabilization $ 700,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ 350,000 82 22 Nov-11 Green (G) City of Rockville Montgomery Glenora Tributary Middle Stream Restoration $ 767,600 $ 767,600 $ - $ - $ 383,800 $ 383,800 85 22 Jul-11 Green (G) Chesapeaeke Bay Trust Anne Arundel Church Creek Stormwater Wetland $ 1,031,000 $ 971,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 515,500 87 22 Dec-11 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Town of Perryville Cecil Town of Perryville Living Shoreline Project $ 691,850 $ 691,850 $ - $ - $ - $ 345,925 94 22 Aug-11 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Green (G) Chesapeake Bay Trust Baltimore City Jones Falls Stream Restoration $ 768,000 $ 738,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 672,000 98 21 Oct-11 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Harford County Harford Sunnyview Stream Restoration Project $ 627,500 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 313,750 $ 313,750 99 21 Aug-11 Green (G) Harford County Harford Bynum Run @ St. Andrew Way Stream Restoration $ 332,500 $ 332,500 $ - $ - $ 166,250 $ 166,250 100 21 Jan-11 Green (G) GB Crossing, Inc. Anne Arundel Glen Burnie Crossing Regenerative SW Conveyance $ 248,000 $ 124,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 124,000 110 20 May-10 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Talbot County Talbot Renewable Energy for Reg II WWTP $ 325,000 $ 325,000 $ - $ - $ 40,625 $ 284,375 111 20 Oct-11 Green (E) Bausum Riva, Inc Anne Arundel Bausum Property Regenerative Stormwater Convey $ 829,000 $ 414,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 414,500 112 20 Jun-11 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Elselore Pretzler Talbot Pretzler Living Shoreline $ 166,100 $ 166,100 $ - $ - $ - $ 83,050 130 19 Oct-11 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Chesapeake Bay Trust Worcester Upper St. Martins River Restoration $ 1,157,000 $ 575,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 578,500 133 18 Oct-11 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Helen Hardcastle Cecil Hardcastle Bohemia River Living Shoreline & Spit $ 182,140 $ 182,140 $ - $ - $ - $ 91,070 146 18 Aug-11 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Terra Noval Ventures, LLC Baltimore City Jones Falls Stream Restoration at Mt. Vernon Mills $ 87,500 $ 43,750 $ - $ - $ - $ 76,563 147 17 Jul-11 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Somerset Co. Sanitary District Somerset Princess Anne WWTP Effluent Reuse $ 157,231 $ 157,231 $ - $ - $ 19,654 $ 137,577 148 17 Dec-10 Green (W) City of Bowie Prince George's Bowie WWTP Building Addition $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 76,700 $ 76,700 150 16 Jan-11 Green (E) Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Alliance-Restoration of NW Creek Queen Anne's Restoration of Northwest Creek $ 732,375 $ 732,375 $ - $ - $ - $ - 157 15 Aug-11 Talbot County Talbot Renewable Energy for Pump Stations in Royal Oak $ 390,000 $ 390,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 158 15 Oct-11 Green (E)/PFA Issues Town of Mt. Lake Park Garrett Town of Mt. Lake Park Pensinger Water Qualilty $ 1,129,229 $ 1,129,229 $ - $ - $ - $ 88,594 161 15 Apr-10 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Town of Federalsburg Caroline Veterans Drive Shoreline Erosion Control - Design $ 62,612 $ 62,612 $ - $ - $ - $ 54,786 181 8 Nov-11 Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Town of Betterton Kent Betterton Bayside Blvd. Living Shoreline Project $ 29,040 $ 29,040 $ - $ - $ - $ 14,520 182 8 Talbot County Talbot Relocated Easton Memorial Hospital Sewer Extension $ 3,557,000 $ 3,332,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 184 2 Nov-10 Green (E) $ - $ 2,560,348 $ 10,280,620 Waitng List & PPL Projects If projects identified for funding are not ready to proceed to construction by 7/2011, projects from the waiting list or project priority list will be selected based on readiness to proceed. Waiting list/PPL projects that were not selected for funding, but are able to proceed to construction by 7/1/211 by meeting MDE's requirements are encouraged to contact MDE loan officers for potential funding. Projects that are listed with zero dollars were either not interested in loans or did not respond to loan interest letter. Future loan interest can only be accommodated based on funding availability. Not Interested in Loan - Green (G) Page 4 of 4 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT MARYLAND WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION FFY 2010 FINAL INTENDED USE PLAN MARYLAND WATER QUALITY REVOLVING LOAN FUND CAP GRANT $ 49,279,000 Admin $ 1,971,160 Table 1: WQSRF PROJECT LIST $ 142,134,800 Capital Projects $ State Match $ 9,855,800 Investments/Interest $ 15,000,000 Loan % New Repayments $ 68,000,000 $ $ 140,163,640 Total Funding APPLICANT COUNTY PROJECT NAME FFY 2010 Sources of Funds Loan Forg.% 120,178,247 $ FFY 2010 Federal Cap. Grant $ $ Recycled. Funds 20010 & InvestmentsIUP (Net) $ Green Loan % 9,772,976 86% $ Green Grant % 3,965,342 20% $ 6,247,076 8% 13% TOTAL FFY '10 CW CW CW CW PRIORITY SCORING CONST. COST ($) REQUEST($) LOAN Loan Forg. GREEN LOAN Green Grant RANK POINTS START Total FFY 2010 Uses of Funds State Matching Grant (20%) Total 47,307,840 IUP Categories Total Federal State Recylced Revenue Bonds 49,279,000 9,855,800 Capital Project/Direct Loans 83,000,000 Admin. Expenses (Max 4% of Cap. Grant) $ - Capital Projects/Linked Deposit Loans $ 142,134,800 Total $ 140,163,640 $ 47,307,840 $ $ 1,971,160 $ 1,971,160 $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - 142,134,800 $ 49,279,000 $ 9,855,800 $ 83,000,000 $ - $ $ $ - 9,855,800 $ 83,000,000 $ - 0.00 FEDERAL PAYMENT & BINDING COMMITMENT SCHEDULE Quarter FFY 2011- Q4 Project Loans using Cap. Grant & State Match $ Administrative Costs using Federal Grant & State Match - 4% $ Subtotal - Federal/State Binding Commitment $ Federal Payment Schedule $ Quarter FFY 2012- Q1 57,163,640 $ FFY 2012- Q2 FFY 2012- Q3 FFY 2012- Q4 FFY 2013- Q1 - $ - $ - $ - $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ FFY 2013- Q2 1,971,160 59,134,800 $ 49,279,000 $ FFY 2011- Q4 FFY 2012- Q1 26,864,250 FFY 2012- Q2 $ 8,047,807 FFY 2012- Q3 $ FFY 2012- Q4 1,819,700 Total $ FFY 2013- Q1 Project Loans using Non- Federal & State Match funds $ 46,268,244 $ Total Binding Commitments - All Sources $ 105,403,044 $ 26,864,250 $ 8,047,807 $ 1,819,700 $ - Cash Flow Projections (Total) $ 26,350,761 $ 33,066,823 $ 35,078,775 $ 35,533,700 $ 9,182,939 $ $ 12,319,750 $ 12,319,750 $ 12,319,750 $ 12,319,750 $ - $ - 20% $ 2,463,950 $ 2,463,950 $ 2,463,950 $ 2,463,950 $ - $ - 57,163,640 $ 1,971,160 $ 59,134,800 $ 49,279,000 FFY 2013- Q2 Total $ - $ 83,000,000 $ - $ 142,134,800 454,925 $ 142,134,800 $ 49,279,000 2,466,877 $ Project Level Disbursement & Admin Federal Cap (Baltimore County) State Match Recycled $ 11,567,061 $ 18,283,123 $ 20,295,075 $ 20,750,000 $ 9,182,939 $ $ 2,466,877 $ - $ 9,855,800 454,925 $ 83,000,000 APPENDIX - A MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT MARYLAND PROJECT PRIORITY LIST FOR FEDERAL AND STATE FY 2010 - 2012 CLEAN WATER FUNDS (STATE REVOLVING LOAN/STATE GRANT) Prepared By WATER QUALITY FINANCING ADMINISTRATION FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CALL 410-537- 3119 Wednesday, June 30, 2010 Rank/ Points 1 Project Title/ Number/ Population Maryland FINAL Project Priority List for Federal FY2010 & State FY2012 Clean Water Funds (State Revolving Loan/ State Grant) Project Description Applicant Name/ County PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE PATAPSCO WWTP ENR MODIFICATIONS - CONTRACT CHESAPEAKE BAY; CONSENT ORDER JFM-02-1524 (BALT COUNTY SHARE; TOTAL COST = $39.2M) SC-855 PCW 0194 POPULATION = 799215 PATAPSCO WWTP BNR CONTRACT SC-845 PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY; CONSENT ORDER JFM-02-1524 (COUNTY SHARE; TOTAL = $202.96M) POPULATION = 799215 PATAPSCO WWTP BNR CONTRACT SC-845 PROJECT: CONSTRUCT BIOLOGICAL AERATED FILTERS TO ACHIEVE NITRIFICATION AS PART OF ENR UPGRADE PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY; JFM-02-1524 (CITY SHARE; TOTAL = $202.96M) 02-13-09-03 PCW 0145 POPULATION = 641943 PROJECT: CONSTRUCT BIOLOGICAL AERATED FILTERS TO ACHIEVE NITRIFICATION AS PART OF ENR UPGRADE PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE PATAPSCO WWTP ENR MODIFICATIONS - CONTRACT CHESAPEAKE BAY; CONSENT ORDER JFM-02-1524 (BALT CITY SHARE; TOTAL = $39.2M) SC-855 PCW 0147 POPULATION = 641943 COX CREEK WRF - ENR UPGRADE POPULATION = 519623 2 02-13-09-03 LARGE I. Secondary Treatment II. Advanced Treatment IIIA. I/I Correction 07/01/2010 34,779,740 LOAN INTEREST II = 34,779,740 34,779,740 06/01/2010 02/28/2013 (L) 10 IUP Baltimore County LORENZO L. GARRETT W/S: Y 46 2 168,183,259 PFA: Y 02-13-09-03 LOAN INTEREST II = 168,183,259 16,366,936 PUBLIC Construction LARGE 06/01/2010 DISADV. 02/28/2013 (L) 10 IUP Baltimore City LORENZO L. GARRETT 46 2 02-13-09-03 W/S: Y Design PFA: Y 11/01/2006 32,256,000 LOAN INTEREST II = 32,256,000 3,256,000 PUBLIC Construction LARGE 07/01/2010 DISADV. 04/30/2012 (L) 10 IUP GLENN SHIPLEY 02 PROJECT: UPGRADE THE 15 MGD PLANT TO ENR LEVELS WITHOUT EXPANSION IIIB. Major Sewer Rehab IVA. New Collector Sewer IVB. New Interceptor Sewer V. Combined Sewer Overflow 6,919,000 PUBLIC Construction 02-13-09-03 W/S: Y Design PFA: Y 10/01/2006 162,644,880 LOAN INTEREST I = 162,644,880 159,270,827 PUBLIC Construction LARGE 02/01/2010 08/31/2015 (L) 10 IUP Anne Arundel County NEEDS CATEGORY DEFINITIONS: II = 6,919,000 PFA: Y ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PCW 0084 6,919,000 Cost By Needs Category PUBLIC Construction W/S: Y 46 30 30 Design 11/01/2006 MDE Funding (L) 10 IUP GLEN KELLER PROJECT: MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE DURING WET WEATHER EVENTS ESSENTIAL FOR COMPLIANCE AND ENR Baltimore City PERFORMANCE PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY W/S: Y Total Cost 04/30/2012 BALTIMORE CITY C/O DPW 30 Milestone Dates PFA: Y LARGE BALTIMORE CITY C/O DPW 30 5 2 BALTIMORE COUNTY DPW PCW 0195 4 46 PROJECT: MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE DURING WET WEATHER EVENTS ESSENTIAL FOR COMPLIANCE AND ENR Baltimore County PERFORMANCE 30 3 GLEN KELLER BALTIMORE COUNTY DPW 30 2 Leg/Cong Project District River Basin Details Page 1 VIA. SW Conveyance Infrastructure VIB. SW Treatment Systems VIC. Green Infrastructure VIIJ. NPS: Sanitary Landfills VIIK. NPS: Hydromodification O. Other LOAN INTEREST PFA (Priority Funding Area) Codes: PFA: 1 = Categorical Exclusion (e.g. BRF, BNR, etc.) PFA: 2 = Categorical Exception (No Expansion) PFA: 3 = Concurrency Review Required PFA: 4 = Exception Under Review PFA: 5 = Exception Granted Wednesday, June 30, 2010 Rank/ Points 6 Project Title/ Number/ Population COLLEGE SO. MD & MT. CARMEL WOODS WWTPS UPGRADE Maryland FINAL Project Priority List for Federal FY2010 & State FY2012 Clean Water Funds (State Revolving Loan/ State Grant) Project Description Applicant Name/ County PROBLEM: EXISTING WWTPS UNABLE TO MEET DISCHARGE PERMIT LIMITS - PUMP COMBINED FLOWS TO MATTAWOMAN WWTP PCW 0156 POPULATION = 147440 7 TALBOT CO BIOSOLIDS UTILIZATION FACILITY UPGRADES 30 PCW 0182 POPULATION = 8 36460 NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WW COLLECTION & TREATMENT P1 PROJECT: DEMOLISH BOTH WWTPS CONSTRUCT 2 PUMP STATIONS, 9,700 LF OF 4" DUCTILE FORCE MAIN, 20,800 LF OF 8" DIP FORCE MAIN PROBLEM: FACILITY COMPONENTS NEED UPGRADE/REPLACEMENT; INADEQUATE PROCESSING TANK CAPACITY & GREASE TREATMENT; CO-09-SS-023 PROJECT: IMPROVE SEPTAGE AND GREASE RECEIVING, TREATMENT AND UTILIZATION OF STABILIZED MATERIAL; CONSTRUCT GREASE DEWATERING FACILITY PROBLEM: FAILING SEPTIC SYSTEMS; 1996 TOWN OF GOLDSBORO CONSENT ORDER. THIS PROJECT WILL SERVE 168 EDUS 28 PCW 0089 POPULATION = 32680 CAMBRIDGE WWTP ENR UPGRADE 10910 W/S: Y Design PFA: 2 06/01/2008 AGING Construction PUBLIC 07/01/2010 LARGE 06/30/2011 Total Cost 6,208,190 TALBOT CO 1 02-13-04-04 W/S: Y Design PFA: 3 01/01/2009 POCOMOKE CITY ENR UPGRADE - ADDITIONAL COSTS 3,100,000 POPULATION = 4098 NEEDS CATEGORY DEFINITIONS: 01 36 02-13-04-04 I. Secondary Treatment II. Advanced Treatment IIIA. I/I Correction 3,100,000 10/01/2011 PROJECT: UPGRADE EXISTING 8.1 MGD FACILITY TO ENR W/S: N Design PFA: 3 07/01/2010 AGING Construction PUBLIC 11/01/2011 LARGE 02/28/2013 4,716,000 1 02-13-04-03 I= (L) 10 IUP W/S: Y Design PFA: 2 12/01/2009 LOAN INTEREST 4,716,000 1,960,000 DISADV. 37 9,339,000 LOAN INTEREST II = 9,339,000 9,339,000 PUBLIC Construction LARGE 02/01/2011 DISADV. 02/28/2012 (L) 10 IUP RUSSELL BLAKE 38B IIIB. Major Sewer Rehab IVA. New Collector Sewer IVB. New Interceptor Sewer V. Combined Sewer Overflow I= (L) 10 IUP KATHELEEN FREEMAN GREGORY A. LE BLANC PROJECT: ADD'L FUNDING NEEDED TO COMPLETE ENR UPGRADE AT EXISTING 1.47 MGD WWTP; UV DISINFECTION; SEPTAGE ACCEPTANCE; VALVE ACTUATORS LOAN INTEREST 11/30/2012 POCOMOKE CITY PCW 0158 6,208,190 3,025,000 Talbot County PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY 30 IVB = PUBLIC Construction LARGE Caroline County PROBLEM: EXCESS NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY Cost By Needs Category 3,104,095 Dorchester County 10 MDE Funding (L) 10 IUP 37A MUN. UTILITIES COM C/O CAMBRIDGE POPULATION = 02-14-01-09 RAY CLARKE PROJECT: CONSTRUCT A LOW PRESSURE SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM AND FORCE MAIN TO CONVEY FLOW TO THE EXISTING WWTP IN GREENSBORO, MD 30 PCW 0073 5 Milestone Dates Charles County CAROLINE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 30 9 MELVIN C. BEALL JR, PE COMMISSIONERS OF CHARLES CO 30 Leg/Cong Project District River Basin Details Page 2 1 02-13-02-02 W/S: Y Design PFA: Y 11/01/2010 500,000 LOAN INTEREST I= 500,000 500,000 PUBLIC Construction SMALL 11/01/2010 DISADV. 11/30/2010 (L) 10 IUP Worcester County VIA. SW Conveyance Infrastructure VIB. SW Treatment Systems VIC. Green Infrastructure VIIJ. NPS: Sanitary Landfills VIIK. NPS: Hydromodification O. Other LOAN INTEREST PFA (Priority Funding Area) Codes: PFA: 1 = Categorical Exclusion (e.g. BRF, BNR, etc.) PFA: 2 = Categorical Exception (No Expansion) PFA: 3 = Concurrency Review Required PFA: 4 = Exception Under Review PFA: 5 = Exception Granted Wednesday, June 30, 2010 Rank/ Points 11 Project Title/ Number/ Population Maryland FINAL Project Priority List for Federal FY2010 & State FY2012 Clean Water Funds (State Revolving Loan/ State Grant) Project Description Applicant Name/ County DENTON WWTP ENR UPGRADE PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY Leg/Cong Project District River Basin Details SCOTT GETCHELL W/S: Y 36 TOWN COMMISSIONERS OF DENTON 30 PCW 0011 POPULATION = 2978 PROJECT: UPGRADE EXISTING 0.8 MGD WWTP TO ENR Milestone Dates 01 Total Cost RAILROAD AVE CSO REMOVAL PROJECT PROBLEM: COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS CATCH BASINS TIED INTO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM; PENDING CONSENT ORDER PCW 0075 POPULATION = 13 2620 SNOW HILL WWTP ENR UPGRADE PROJECT: SEPARATE THE CATCH BASINS FROM THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, INSTALL 2,150 LF 12" NEW STORM DRAIN & TREATMENT SYSTEM PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY 05/01/2010 (L) 10 IUP GEORGE E. MAYER, JR W/S: Y 37 1 POPULATION = 2410 1,300,000 PFA: 2 02-13-03-06 V= GREENSBORO WWTP CAPACITY UPGRADE PUBLIC Construction SMALL 04/01/2011 LOAN UNWANTED Caroline County KELLY BREWINTON 1 PROJECT: UPGRADE EXISTING 0.5 MGD FACILITY TO ENR PROBLEM: FAILING SEPTICS IN THE TOWN OF GOLDSBORO; 1996 GOLDSBORO CONSENT ORDER. THIS PROJECT WILL SERVE 800 EDUS 02-13-02-02 W/S: Y Design PFA: 1 11/30/2009 14,015,224 II = 14,015,224 6,567,210 PUBLIC Construction SMALL 11/29/2010 DISADV. 05/25/2012 LOAN UNWANTED PCW 0110 POPULATION = 15 DAVID L. KIBLER 36 TOWN OF GREENSBORO 30 1633 ANNAPOLIS WRF - ENR UPGRADE 01 PROJECT: EXPAND THE GREENSBORO WWTP AT .32MGD FROM .28MGD TO TREAT GOLDSBORO'S FLOW INSTALL NEW SCREENS, FILTERS, UV RADIATION Caroline County PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY GLENN SHIPLEY 02-13-04-04 ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PCW 0081 GREEN POPULATION = 519623 (E) 03 PROJECT: UPGRADE EXISTING 13.0 MGD WWTP TO ENR W/S: N Design PFA: 3 07/01/2011 AGING Construction PUBLIC 11/01/2012 SMALL 04/30/2013 02-13-10-02 I. Secondary Treatment II. Advanced Treatment IIIA. I/I Correction IIIB. Major Sewer Rehab IVA. New Collector Sewer IVB. New Interceptor Sewer V. Combined Sewer Overflow I= Design PFA: Y 09/01/2007 3,230,000 730,000 (L) 10 IUP W/S: Y 26,563,056 LOAN INTEREST II = 26,563,056 25,932,056 PUBLIC Construction LARGE 09/01/2010 09/30/2012 (L) 10 IUP Anne Arundel County NEEDS CATEGORY DEFINITIONS: 3,230,000 DISADV. 30 29 1,300,000 1,300,000 Worcester County 14 LOAN INTEREST DISADV. 01/31/2012 TOWN OF SNOW HILL PCW 0026 6,003,591 DISADV. 05/01/2011 38B 30 II = PUBLIC Construction SMALL TOWN OF FEDERALSBURG 30 Cost By Needs Category 6,003,591 Caroline County 12 MDE Funding 6,003,591 PFA: 1 02-13-04-04 Page 3 VIA. SW Conveyance Infrastructure VIB. SW Treatment Systems VIC. Green Infrastructure VIIJ. NPS: Sanitary Landfills VIIK. NPS: Hydromodification O. Other LOAN INTEREST PFA (Priority Funding Area) Codes: PFA: 1 = Categorical Exclusion (e.g. BRF, BNR, etc.) PFA: 2 = Categorical Exception (No Expansion) PFA: 3 = Concurrency Review Required PFA: 4 = Exception Under Review PFA: 5 = Exception Granted Wednesday, June 30, 2010 Rank/ Points 16 Project Title/ Number/ Population LANDFARE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND RETROFIT Maryland FINAL Project Priority List for Federal FY2010 & State FY2012 Clean Water Funds (State Revolving Loan/ State Grant) Project Description Applicant Name/ County PROBLEM: POND'S BRICK RISER STRUCTURE FAILED DANIEL HARPER AND IS NO LONGER FUNCTIONING PCW 0141 POPULATION = 952500 28 PROJECT: REPAIR EMBANKMENT EROSION, RE-GRADE POND, AND BUILD WEIR CONTROL STRUCTURE TO MEET CURRENT SWM AND SAFETY STANDARDS GARNER/BRANDYWINE SCRAP PROBLEM: ILLEGAL STOCKPILE OF > 1 MILLION WASTE TIRES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY CLOGGING TIRE STOCKPILE CLEANUP STREAM AND A PUBLIC HEALTH RISK (ESP. FROM FIRE) PCW 0002 GREEN POPULATION = 864655 (G) PROJECT: REMOVE TIERS AND RETURN 5 RAVINES TO NATURAL STATE, INCLUDING REFORESTATION AND WETLAND RESTORATION WETLAND 2 18 HOBBS ROAD LANDFILL; CLOSURE & CAPPING PROBLEM: APPROXIMATELY 2,000,000 GAL LANDFILL LEACHATE IS ENTERING WATER SYSTEM PER YEAR; CO-07-SW-176 PCW 0173 POPULATION = 32680 PROJECT: BUILD A CLOSURE CAP CONFIGURATION CONSISTING OF GEOMEMBRANE, GEOCOMPOSITE DRAINAGE MATERIAL, COVER SOIL MATER, GAS COLLECT LINDEN ST CSO ELIMINATION PROBLEM: COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS; 01-C-00-18342L PROJECT, PHASE VI D&E 02-14-02-05 PCW 0071 POPULATION = 7873 BLUE PLAINS WWTP ENR PROJECT: ELIMINATE 3 CSO AT SAND SPRING INTERCEPTOR, GEORGES CREEK PUMPING STATION AND LAVALE SYSTEM-REPLACE PIPES PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE NUTRIENTS TO THE BAY POPULATION = 1361940 Design 04/01/2009 MDE Funding 271,742 VIB = PUBLIC Construction 05/01/2011 LOAN UNWANTED WILLIAM (KEN) LATHROUM W/S: E 27A 5 8,845,475 PFA: E MARYLAND ENV. SERVICE 02-13-11-01 VIIK = I. Secondary Treatment II. Advanced Treatment IIIA. I/I Correction 8,845,475 6,720,475 PUBLIC Construction LARGE 06/01/2009 06/30/2012 (L) 10 IUP Prince George's County STEVE TOMCZEWSKI 36 1 02-13-04-04 W/S: E Design PFA: E 06/01/2008 3,454,324 LOAN INTEREST VIIJ = 3,454,324 3,454,324 PUBLIC Construction LARGE 06/01/2010 DISADV. 07/31/2011 (L) 10 IUP Caroline County CHRISTOPHER L. HOVATTER 01B 06 02-14-10-25 Allegany County W/S: Y Design PFA: Y 04/01/2007 AGING Construction PUBLIC 10/01/2010 SMALL 10/30/2011 1,590,995 REG 02-14-02-01 VIA. SW Conveyance Infrastructure VIB. SW Treatment Systems VIC. Green Infrastructure VIIJ. NPS: Sanitary Landfills LOAN INTEREST V= 1,590,995 500,000 LOAN UNWANTED DISADV. ROLAND STEINER PROJECT: UPGRADE EXISTING 370 MGD WWTP TO ENR (MARYLAND'S PORTION IS 169.6 MGD) IIIB. Major Sewer Rehab IVA. New Collector Sewer IVB. New Interceptor Sewer V. Combined Sewer Overflow 271,742 203,807 W/S: Y Design PFA: 2 07/01/2009 401,500,000 II = 401,500,000 401,500,000 PUBLIC Construction LARGE 09/01/2011 12/31/2017 (L) 10 IUP NEEDS CATEGORY DEFINITIONS: Cost By Needs Category 10/30/2011 WSSC PCW 0062 W/S: E Total Cost Montgomery County REG 27 Milestone Dates PFA: E LARGE CITY OF FROSTBURG 28 20 08 MARYLAND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE 28 19 20 MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEP 28 17 Leg/Cong Project District River Basin Details Page 4 VIIK. NPS: Hydromodification O. Other LOAN INTEREST PFA (Priority Funding Area) Codes: PFA: 1 = Categorical Exclusion (e.g. BRF, BNR, etc.) PFA: 2 = Categorical Exception (No Expansion) PFA: 3 = Concurrency Review Required PFA: 4 = Exception Under Review PFA: 5 = Exception Granted Maryland FINAL Project Priority List for Federal FY2010 & State FY2012 Clean Water Funds (State Revolving Loan/ State Grant) Wednesday, June 30, 2010 Rank/ Points 21 Project Title/ Number/ Population Project Description Applicant Name/ County PROBLEM: EXCESSIVE N

Useful Suggestions for Finishing Your ‘Mental Health Counselling Invoice Template Republic’ Online

Are you fed up with the inconvenience of handling documents? Look no further than airSlate SignNow, the leading electronic signature service for individuals and small to medium-sized businesses. Bid farewell to the lengthy routine of printing and scanning documents. With airSlate SignNow, you can effortlessly finalize and sign documents online. Take advantage of the powerful features integrated into this user-friendly and affordable platform and transform your method of document management. Whether you need to approve forms or collect signatures, airSlate SignNow manages it all seamlessly, with just a few clicks.

Adhere to this comprehensive guideline:

  1. Log into your account or register for a free trial with our service.
  2. Select +Create to upload a file from your device, cloud storage, or our template library.
  3. Open your ‘Mental Health Counselling Invoice Template Republic’ in the editor.
  4. Click Me (Fill Out Now) to set up the form on your end.
  5. Include and assign fillable fields for others (if needed).
  6. Proceed with the Send Invite settings to solicit eSignatures from others.
  7. Download, print your version, or convert it into a reusable template.

Don’t fret if you need to collaborate with others on your Mental Health Counselling Invoice Template Republic or submit it for notarization—our platform provides you with everything necessary to accomplish these tasks. Sign up with airSlate SignNow today and elevate your document management to a new standard!

Here is a list of the most common customer questions. If you can’t find an answer to your question, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us.

Need help? Contact Support
Mental health counselling invoice template republic word
Mental health counselling invoice template republic pdf
Mental health counselling invoice template republic excel
Mental health counselling invoice template republic free
Speech therapy invoice template
Massage therapy invoice template
Bookipi invoice template
Physical therapy invoice
Sign up and try Mental health counselling invoice template republic form
  • Close deals faster
  • Improve productivity
  • Delight customers
  • Increase revenue
  • Save time & money
  • Reduce payment cycles