IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
VS. CASE NO.
, , , AND
DEFENDANTS' AMENDED ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSS - CLAIM
COMES NOW, the Defendants, and husband/wife , by and through counsel and
files this their Amended Answer and would show unto the Court the following:
MOTION TO DISMISS
That the Court fails to have proper jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter or
in the alternative moves the Court to transfer this cause to the Circuit Court of County or the
Circuit Court of the Judicial District of County, Mississippi.
MOTION TO DISMISS
That the Complaint as filed herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
as against these Defendants.
Your Defendants, and , who, without waiving any of their rights as set out above,
hereby make this their Answer and says:
1.
In answering paragraph numbered one (1), Sections (G) and (H), your Defendants,
and deny that they are proper parties to this action, and admit that they are adult resident
citizens of County, Mississippi.
2.
In answering paragraph numbered one (2), your Defendants, and deny that this
Court has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter, in that both Defendants are
residents of County.
3.
Defendants, and deny any knowledge of Mr./Ms. ’s action on or about the
day of , 20 .
4.
Your Defendants, , deny that they entered into any such account agreement, in that
they never signed any such agreement.
5.
Defendants and deny that they are jointly and severally bound by the Account
Agreements because they never signed any such agreement.
6.
Defendants and have no knowledge or facts upon which to base an answer to the
paragraph numbered six (6) and therefore denies same.
7.
Defendants, and have no knowledge or facts upon which to base an answer to the
paragraph numbered seven (7) and therefore denies same.
8.
Defendants, and have no knowledge or facts upon which to base an answer to the
paragraph numbered eight (8) and therefore denies same.
9.
Defendants, and have no knowledge or facts upon which to base an answer to the
paragraph numbered nine (9) and therefore denies same.
10.
Defendants, and have no knowledge or facts upon which to base an answer to the
paragraph numbered ten (10) and therefore denies same.
11.
Defendants, and have no knowledge or facts upon which to base an answer to the
paragraph numbered eleven (11) and therefore denies same.
12.
Defendants, and have no knowledge or facts upon which to base an answer to the
paragraph numbered twelve (12) and therefore denies same.
13.
Defendants, and have no knowledge or facts upon which to base an answer to the
paragraph numbered thirteen (13) and therefore denies same.
14.
Defendants, and deny the allegations as set forth in paragraph numbered fourteen
(14)
15.
Defendants, and deny that a declaration of rights and liabilities should be made as
to determine Defendants' liability since they are not proper parties to this action.
16.
Defendants, have no knowledge or facts upon which to base an answer to the
paragraph numbered sixteen (16) and therefore denies same.
17.
Defendants, deny the allegations as set forth in the paragraph numbered seventeen
(17).
18.
Defendants, and admit the allegations as set forth in the paragraph numbered
eighteen (18).
19.
Defendants, and deny that an injunction be issued against them because they have
no knowledge of any funds held by or any other institution.
20.
Defendants, and deny the allegations as set forth in the paragraph numbered
twenty (20).
In answering the "WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED" section of the Complaint
Defendants, and deny that the Plaintiff is entitled to any such relief as against
Defendants, and .
DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIM
COMES NOW, the Defendants/Counter - Plaintiffs, and , by and through counsel
and having answered Plaintiffs complaint, hereby files this their counterclaim pursuant to Rule
13(a) as against the Plaintiff/Counter - Defendant, and would show unto the Court the
following facts and matters to - wit:
1.
That your Defendants/Counter - Plaintiffs, and are each bona fide adult resident
citizens of County, Mississippi.
2.
That your Plaintiff/Counter - Defendant, is a state chartered banking institution having
its principle banking office at in , Mississippi and having a primary operations center in
County, Mississippi.
3.
That at all times mentioned your Defendants and were, have been, and now are
law abiding citizens, known to neighbors, constituents and acquaintances to have behaved and
conducted themselves in a manner conducive to good citizenship.
4.
That the Plaintiff/Counter - Defendant, , has negligently caused the Defendants,
and unjustly to suffer financial hardship and embarrassment. Only , 20 ,
Plaintiff/Counter - Defendant negligently entered into an agreement with to procure an
Account Agreement, by means of falsifying signatures and social security numbers which were
at no time sworn to by a notary or witnesses by any agents of the Bank.
5.
That at all times mentioned herein, Counter - Defendant, had in its employment , which
was an agent servant and employee of and conducting business for and in the furtherance
of ’s business.
6.
That , an agent for , entered into an agreement with to open an account, with
Co - Defendants and to be jointly liable for the debts and overdraft of said account, with
. knew, or should have known, he/she did not have the proper authorization from
Counter - Plaintiffs to open such an account but still entered into the agreement. That ’s acts
were grossly negligent in that he/she should have verified the signatures of Counter - Plaintiff on
the agreement. That his/her failure to witness the signatures or verify their authenticity
constitutes gross negligent conduct which put the Defendants, and , in this case at risk for
financial responsibilities for which they had absolutely no knowledge. At no time did either of
your Defendants, or sign any documentation relative of this matter.
7.
That because of the Counter - Defendant’s grossly negligent acts, Defendants/Counter -
Plaintiffs have both suffered extreme mental anguish, and have and will be forced to expend
sizeable sums of money, in defending this action, and have been injured in credit standing,
emotional distress, damage to his/her business and cost in defending this action in the amount of
$ .
8.
That in committing the acts, Plaintiff/Counter - Defendant's acts constituted gross
negligence or willful and wanton conduct towards the Defendants, and and said
Defendants/Counter - Plaintiffs are therefore entitled to recover from
Plaintiff/Counter - Defendants punitive damages in the sum of $ .
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendants/Counter - Plaintiffs pray that
upon a proper hearing of this Counterclaim the Court will grant and a judgment of and
from the Plaintiff/Counter - Defendant, in the amount of $ as actual damages together
with $ as punitive damages together with attorneys fees and all costs herein.
DEFENDANTS CROSS - CLAIM
1.
That your Defendants/Cross - Plaintiffs, and are each bona fide adult resident
citizens of County, Mississippi.
2.
That your Cross - Defendant, is a bona fide adult resident citizen of County,
Mississippi who may be served with process at , , MS . That the Defendant, is a
foreign corporation having its principle place of office at , , , subject to the jurisdiction
of this Court by personal service on its agent, , at said office.
3.
That on or about the day of , , the Cross - Defendant, entered into an
agreement with the to open an account at their bank. That pursuant to his/her written
agreement he/she forged with the knowledge and consent of , the signatures of at least two of
his/her co - signers, and , pursuant to his/her Account Agreement. That in addition to
forging their signatures, likewise forged the Social Security numbers of each
Defendant/Cross Plaintiff all with the knowledge and consent of .
4.
That because of the Cross - Defendant, ’s willful and intentional acts,
Defendants/Cross - Plaintiffs, have both suffered extreme mental anguish, and have and will be
forced to expend sizeable sums of money, in defending themselves, and have been injured in
credit and circumstances, in the sum of $ .
5.
Plaintiff charges , at all times mentioned herein, was the agent, servant, and employee
of Cross - Defendant, and acting in the furtherance of the business of and was authorized
to act for and in place of and therefore responsible for the acts of as was within the
scope of his/her employment. That in addition, because of the business relationship carried on
by and between and with , it gave the general public, and more particularly, your
Plaintiffs herein, that had the apparent authority to act for and on behalf of and therefore
Plaintiff relied upon Cross-Defendant agent and being one in the same as . Plaintiff was
of the opinion and so thought that he/she was doing business directly with .
6.
Plaintiff would show unto the Court they had placed in trust with through its agent,
monies which were to be used for investments and profits. These monies were placed in trust
with in , and all correspondence, ledgers, checks, and other related matters in doing
business with and came directly from , .
7.
Plaintiff would further show unto the Court that Cross - Defendant, , forged the
signatures of Plaintiff to a change of address form which was furnished to him/her by Defendant,
. The instrument was received by Defendant, from Cross - Defendant , and at all times
acting as agent for and same was filed with the office of . The instrument reflected that
all correspondence, ledgers, checks, any and all other written documents changed to be mailed
from the Plaintiff’s home address to that of ’s home address or that of the office of in ,
Mississippi. As a result of this forged instrument, of , began sending all
correspondence together with checks and other material either to ’s home address or to the
office address in , Mississippi. Defendant received numerous checks written directly to
the Plaintiff as a result of the forged instrument, then forged the checks and deposited the funds
to a account known as .
8.
Further, your Plaintiff charges that at all times mentioned herein Defendant knew or
should have known in their dealings with in their dealings with him/her as their agent, that
the signatures on all the instruments and checks were not that of the Plaintiff, and as a result
failed to carry out their duties and responsibilities owed to the Plaintiff herein, and were
negligent in their acts toward the Plaintiff.
9.
That because of the acts of both Cross - Defendants, and , and are both
jointly and severally liable to the Defendant/Cross - Plaintiffs herein in the amount of $ as
actual damages and because of the willful, wanton and gross negligent acts on part of both
Cross - Defendants your Defendant/Cross - Plaintiffs are entitled to $ as punitive damages
together with all costs, including attorneys fees and any other related expense in having to
prosecute this action.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, your Defendants/Cross - Plaintiffs and
pray that the Court enter a judgment of and from the Cross - Defendants, and in the
amount of $ as actual damages, together with $ as punitive damages together with
attorneys fees and all costs of this action.
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________________________
Attorney for
Of counsel:
Telephone:
MSB #
Attorney for