Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Order After Review of Petition for Visits

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Petition for Visits (PTV)

Superior Court of Washington, County of

In re visits with:

Children:

Petitioner/s (person/s who started this case):

Respondent/s (parent/s, legal custodian, and anyone with court-ordered residential time):

No.

Petition for Visits

Use this form to ask for visits only if all these are true:

• You are a relative of the child or a relative of the child’s parent.

• You have an ongoing and substantial relationship with the child.

• The child is likely to suffer harm or substantial risk of harm if visits are denied.

• You’ve never filed a petition for visits with the child before.

You must prove your case by clear and convincing evidence. You may have to pay for Respondent’s costs and lawyer fees in advance.

1. Petitioner’s Information

My name is:

I live in (county and state only):

I am related to the child in this way:

If there is another Petitioner in this case, put the other Petitioner’s information below.

My name is:

Lives in (county and state only):

I am related to the child in this way:

This is the first Petition for Visits filed by Petitioner/s for these children.

2. Family Relationship

I am related to the children or the children’s parent as follows (check all that apply, if more than one petitioner, specify each petitioner’s relationship):

“Parent” means a legal parent whose rights have not been terminated, relinquished, or declared not to exist.

Blood relative, including those of half-blood, and including first cousins, second cousins, nephews or nieces, and persons of preceding generations as denoted by prefixes of grand, great, or great-great, or

That person’s spouse, even after the marriage is terminated or One of those relatives of any half sibling of the child.

Stepfather, stepmother, stepbrother, and stepsister, or

That person’s spouse, even after the marriage is terminated or One of those relatives of any half sibling of the child.

A person who legally adopts a child or the child's parent as well as the biological and other legally adopted children of such persons, and other relatives of the adoptive parents in accordance with state law, or

That person’s spouse, even after the marriage is terminated or One of those relatives of any half sibling of the child.

Extended family members, as defined by the law or custom of an Indian child's tribe or, in the absence of such law or custom, a person who has reached the age of eighteen and who is the Indian child's grandparent, aunt or uncle, brother or sister, brother-in-law or sister-in-law, niece or nephew, first or second cousin, or stepparent who provides care in the family abode on a twenty-four hour basis to an Indian child as defined in 25 U.S.C. Sec. 1903(4).

3. Children

I ask the court for visits with the following children.

The children live in (county and state only):

Child's Name Age Child's Name Age
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.

The children live in (county and state only):

4. Respondents’ Information

List the children’s parents and anyone else with court-ordered residential time with the children.

Respondent (name):

Relationship to the children in this case:

Lives in (county and state only):

Other Respondent, if any (name):

Relationship to the children in this case:

Lives in (county and state only):

5. Other people with a legal right to spend time with a child

Do you know of anyone besides you and the Respondents who has or claims to have a legal right to spend time with any of these children?

(Check one): No. (Skip to 7.) Yes. (Fill out below.)

Name of person Children this person may have the right to spend time with
All children
All children
All children

6. Children’s Home/s

During the past 5 years have any of the children lived:

• on an Indian reservation,

• outside Washington state,

• in a foreign country, or

• with anyone other than Petitioner/s and/or Respondent/s?

No. (Skip to 7) Yes. (Fill out below to show where each child has lived during the last 5 years.)

Dates Children Lived with In which state, Indian reservation, or foreign country
From:
To:
All children
Petitioner/s
Resp. (name/s)
Other (name)
From:
To:
All children
Petitioner/s
Resp. (name/s)
Other (name)

7. Other court cases involving a child

Do you know of any court cases involving any of these children?

(Check one): No. (Skip to 8.) Yes. (Fill out below.)

Kind of case County and State Case number and year Children
All children
All children

8. Jurisdiction over the children

This Court can decide this case for the children because (check all that apply; if a box applies to all of the children, you may write “the children” instead of listing names):

Exclusive, continuing jurisdiction – A Washington court has already made a custody order or parenting plan for the children, and the court still has authority to make other orders for .

Home state jurisdiction – Washington is the children’s home state because:

lived in Washington with a parent or someone acting as a parent for at least the 6 months just before this case was filed, or if the children are less than 6 months old, they have lived in Washington with a parent or someone acting as a parent since birth.

There were times the children were not in Washington in the 6 months just before this case was filed (or since birth if they are less than 6 months old), but those were temporary absences.

do not live in Washington right now, but Washington was the children’s home state some time in the 6 months just before this case was filed, and a parent or someone acting as a parent of the children still lives in Washington.

do not have another home state.

No home state or home state declined – No court of any other state (or tribe) has the jurisdiction to make decisions for or a court in the children’s home state (or tribe) decided it is better to have this case in Washington and:

• The children and a parent or someone acting as a parent have ties to Washington beyond just living here; and

• There is a lot of information (substantial evidence) about the children’s care, protection, education and relationships in this state.

Other state declined – The courts in other states (or tribes) that might be ’s home state have refused to take this case because it is better to have this case in Washington.

Other reason (specify):

9. County where this case should be heard

I am filing this petition in this county because:

There is a juvenile court case involving child custody or out-of-home placement filed in this county under case number/s

The children live most of the time in this county. There is no juvenile court case involving child custody or out-of-home placement filed in any county.

Other reason:

Petitioner’s Statement (Affidavit)

If you need additional space for any section, below, use the Declaration FL All Family 135.

10. Ongoing and substantial relationship

I had an ongoing and substantial relationship with the children for at least two years, or, if a child is under two, for at least half the child’s life and with a shared expectation of and desire for an ongoing relationship.

(Describe how your relationship with the children was formed and sustained through interaction, companionship, and mutuality of interest and affection, without expectation of financial compensation and with substantial continuity.)

11. Risk of harm

Warning! The court will presume that a fit parent’s decision to deny visits is in the best interest of the children and does not create a likelihood of harm or a substantial risk of harm to the children. Petitioners must overcome this presumption by clear and convincing evidence.

The children are likely to suffer harm or a substantial risk of harm if visits are denied. (Explain why and how the children would be harmed.)

12. Best interest

Warning! Petitioner must prove visits are in the children’s best interest by clear and convincing evidence.

Visits are in the children’s best interest considering these factors:

a. Current relationship:

b. Prior relationship:

c. Relationship between parties:

d. Respondent’s relationship:

e. Objection:

f. Effect if granted:

g. Residential time:

h. Good faith:

i. Abuse or neglect:

j. Child’s preference:

k. Other:

13. Visits Requested

(Specify frequency and lengths of visits you are requesting.)

Petitioner fills out below:

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the facts I have provided on this form are true.

Signed at (city and state):

Date:

Petitioner signs here

Print name

Other Petitioner (if any) fills out below:

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the facts I have provided on this form are true.

Signed at (city and state):

Date:

Other Petitioner signs here

Print name

Petitioner’s lawyer (if any) fills out below:

Petitioner’s lawyer signs here

Print name and WSBA No.

Date

Warning! Documents filed with the court are available for anyone to see unless they are sealed. Financial, medical, and confidential reports, as described in General Rule 22, must be sealed so they can only be seen by the court, the other parties, and the lawyers in your case. Seal those documents by filing them separately, using a Sealed cover sheet (form FL All Family 011, 012, or 013). You may ask for an order to seal other documents.

Respondent agrees to join this Petition

I, , agree to join this Petition. I understand that if I fill out and sign below, the court may approve the requests listed in this Petition unless I file and serve a Response before the court signs final orders.

I do not need to be notified about the court’s hearings or decisions in this case.

I ask the Petitioner to notify me about any hearings in this case. (List an address where you agree to accept legal documents.)

Address City State Zip

Respondent signs here

Print name

Date

Other Respondent agrees to join this Petition

I, , agree to join this Petition. I understand that if I fill out and sign below, the court may approve the requests listed in this Petition unless I file and serve a Response before the court signs final orders.

I do not need to be notified about the court’s hearings or decisions in this case.

I ask the Petitioner to notify me about any hearings in this case. (List an address where you agree to accept legal documents.)

Address City State Zip

Other Respondent signs here

Print name

Date

Enter text✕

What an Order After Review of Petition for Visits Is

An Order After Review of Petition for Visits is a court-issued written directive entered after a judge reviews a petition requesting visitation rights or visitation modifications. It records the court's factual findings, legal conclusions, and the specific visitation schedule, conditions, and any supervisory requirements. The order creates enforceable obligations for the parties, may direct service on institutions or third parties, and typically becomes part of the official case record available through the court clerk. It can govern visits to a child, an incarcerated person, or a resident in a licensed facility depending on case type.

Why a Clear, Complete Order Matters

A well-drafted order reduces ambiguity about who may visit, when visits occur, and what conditions apply. Clear language helps avoid enforcement disputes, protects the interests of any child or protected person, and gives facility administrators and law enforcement a concrete basis for compliance and enforcement.

Why a Clear, Complete Order Matters

Who Interacts With This Order

Each participant has distinct responsibilities: drafting accuracy lies with counsel or parties; clerks handle filing; facilities apply conditions during visits.

  • Petitioners and respondents — parents, guardians, or parties directly affected by visitation rulings.
  • Attorneys and guardians ad litem — draft, propose findings, and argue factual issues to the court.
  • Court staff and facility administrators — file, docket, serve, and implement visitation logistics.

Core Sections Every Professional Order Should Include

A complete Order After Review of Petition for Visits groups factual findings, legal conclusions, and operational directives so parties and administrators can implement and enforce the visitation plan without additional interpretation.

Case Caption

Identifies the court, case number, and full party names so the order is linked unambiguously to the underlying docket and enforceable by the issuing court.

Findings

Concise factual findings that explain the basis for the court’s decision, including any evidentiary support and risk assessment relevant to visitation safety.

Conclusions of Law

Legal basis for granting or denying visitation, citing statutory authority or case law where the court relies on legal standard or protective statutes.

Visitation Schedule

A specific, dated schedule listing days, times, duration, location, and start/end dates to eliminate ambiguity during implementation.

Conditions

Any supervision requirements, background checks, age limits, prohibited activities, or health and safety conditions that must be met before or during visits.

Enforcement and Next Steps

Instructions regarding service, penalties for noncompliance, reporting requirements, and the date or conditions for a follow-up review or modification hearing.

Required Data Elements at a Glance

Case Number: Court docket ID
Full Party Names: Legal names
Judge or Magistrate: Presiding officer
Effective Date: Start date
Visitation Terms: Schedule summary
Service Instructions: How to serve

Step-by-Step: Preparing and Submitting the Order

Follow this sequence to draft, review, and submit the Order After Review of Petition for Visits in a way courts and facilities can act upon quickly.

  • 01
    Gather Records: Collect pleadings, hearing transcript, reports, and identification for parties.
  • 02
    Draft Order: Insert findings, schedules, and enforceable conditions verbatim.
  • 03
    Clerk Filing: File with the clerk according to local e-filing or paper rules.
  • 04
    Serve Parties: Serve parties and any institution per court service rules.

Where to File and Who to Notify

The order must be filed with the issuing court and served on all parties and any institution responsible for implementing visits; different recipients have distinct delivery needs.

  • Court Clerk: File the signed order to enter it on the docket.
  • Opposing Party: Serve per state rules: personal, mail, or authorized e-service.
  • Facility Administrator: Provide the order to the site that will host or approve visits.
  • Probation or Child Welfare: Send to supervising agencies if they monitor compliance.

How to Configure an Online Completion Workflow

Typical e-submission workflows include identity checks, signature placement, and automated notifications; set these before sending to avoid rework.

Platform PDF or case-management e-filing
Authentication Email link or SMS code
Signature Order Judge clerk then parties
Conditional Fields Show supervision terms when applicable
Notifications Auto-send signed copy to all recipients

Digital Formats and Technical Delivery Considerations

Confirm the court’s e-filing rules and any facility requirements before delivering digital copies; maintain secure storage and an auditable trail for each transaction.

  • File Formats: PDF or DOCX as permitted by court e-filing
  • Authentication Options: Email link, SMS code, or stronger KBA for higher risk cases
  • Integrations: E-file systems and case-management platforms supported

Typical Deadlines and Timing Expectations

Timelines differ by jurisdiction but certain actions commonly follow issuance: service, implementation, review, and potential appeals.

Service After Entry:

Serve the signed order according to local rules, often within a few days.

Implementation Start Date:

Visitation often begins on the order's effective date or a specified future date.

Request for Review:

Parties may request a review or modification per local motion practice, timing varies.

Appeal Period:

Most civil appeals require notice within about 30 days, but check state appellate rules.

Record Retention:

Maintain filings in the case file per court records schedule.

Key Milestones from Petition to Enforcement

A clear milestone timeline helps track progress: file, hearing, order entry, service, and follow-up monitoring.

01

Petition Filed

Docketing of the petition and setting of a hearing date.

02

Review Hearing

Judge receives evidence and hears argument before ruling.

03

Order Issued

Judge signs and clerk enters the order on the docket.

04

Service and Monitoring

Parties and institutions are served and compliance monitored.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Preparing the Order

  • Ambiguous scheduling language that omits precise start times or duration, producing administrative disputes or missed visits.
  • Failure to state enforcement mechanism or consequence for noncompliance, making it difficult for courts or administrators to act.
  • Not specifying who bears travel, supervision, or testing costs when such costs are prerequisites for visitation.
  • Neglecting to include facility-specific requirements or failing to serve the order on the site that hosts visits.

Risks and Consequences of an Incomplete or Incorrect Order

Contempt Proceedings: Possible sanctions
Visits Suspended: Access may be denied
Civil Fines: Monetary penalties
Enforcement Delay: Implementation postponed
Increased Litigation: Further court motions
Administrative Costs: Higher compliance expenses

Practical Examples of Orders and How They Read

Two concise examples show how findings, schedule, and conditions are combined into a single enforceable order.

Example 1

A dependency case resulted in an order granting supervised visits three times weekly beginning 08/01/2026

  • Supervision required by a licensed provider during all visits.
  • The order specified a 90-day review, required written logs for each visit, and directed the agency to report compliance to the court.

Example 2

A correctional visitation petition granted contact visits every other Saturday starting 09/05/2026

  • Visitor must be on the approved list and produce government ID at entry.
  • The order instructed the facility to implement the schedule, outlined prohibited items, and provided a process for temporary suspension pending safety review.

Comparing eSignature Providers for Court Order Workflows

Select an eSignature provider based on price, trial availability, bulk sending, audit capabilities, and compliance options; signNow appears first for direct comparison.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial No No Yes, limited Yes, limited
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes (BAA) Yes Yes No No

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to common practical and technical questions about executing, serving, and enforcing an Order After Review of Petition for Visits.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users