What is the legal standard?

A motion succeeds if there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; courts view evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.

May I rely on affidavits?

Yes if affidavits are sworn and based on personal knowledge, contain admissible matter, and comply with 28 U.S.C. §1746 or are notarized. Hearsay within an affidavit may be excluded if it lacks an exception.

Can I file before discovery ends?

Often yes, but many courts limit motions until discovery concludes; parties sometimes request short postponements under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) if additional discovery is needed to oppose.

How should exhibits be authenticated?

Provide sworn testimony, deposition excerpts, business-record certification, or witness declarations tying documents to admissible sources to satisfy authentication requirements.

Are electronic signatures acceptable?

Electronic signatures and e-signed declarations are generally acceptable under ESIGN and UETA when authenticable and retained; specific court rules may require original notarization for certain affidavits.

What happens after denial or grant?

If granted, the court disposes of the claim or issue; if denied, parties proceed to trial or further discovery. Either outcome may prompt interlocutory appeals in limited circumstances.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Other
Rule 56 Summary Judgment

Rule 56 Summary Judgment

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

and

PLAINTIFFS

VS.

CIVIL ACTION NO.

DEFENDANT

This day this cause coming on for hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion For Summary Judgment on the Issue of Liability, and the Court having considered the matter, and now being fully advised in the premises, finds that plaintiffs are entitled to an order declaring that defendant's guilty plea to counts one and nineteen of the indictment against him/her in Criminal Case No. , in this Court, for conspiracy to defraud and wire fraud, operates to conclusively establish in the instant civil litigation the duty owed by the defendant, and his breach thereof, or "legal fault", as contemplated by Jordan V. McKenna, 573 So.2d 1371 (Miss. 1990).

The Court further finds that the factual basis for defendant's guilty plea in said criminal case establishing his/her guilt beyond any reasonable doubt therein was the intentional and fraudulent conduct alleged in plaintiff's complaint in the instant case.

No finding is made by the Court herein as to whether the defendant is guilty of any negligence or unintentional conduct as may be alleged in plaintiff's complaint.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Liability be, and it is hereby, granted, and defendant's legal fault based on intentional, fraudulent conduct is hereby established as to plaintiffs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the questions of causation between the aforesaid legal fault and plaintiffs' alleged emotional distress, and plaintiffs' injuries and damages, if any, as a proximate result thereof, are hereby set for a first setting on the day of , 20 at o'clock in the Circuit Courtroom of the County Courthouse in .

SO ORDERED, on this the day of , 20.

Circuit Court Judge

What the Rule 56 Summary Judgment Is

A Rule 56 summary judgment is a dispositive motion under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Fed. R. Civ. P. 56) asking the court to decide a claim as a matter of law because there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact. The moving party supports the motion with admissible evidence—depositions, affidavits, admissions, and documents—and the opponent must show a factual dispute that would permit a reasonable jury to decide in its favor. Judges evaluate the motion under the applicable legal standard and local rules; if granted, trial is avoided on resolved claims.

Why counsel and parties rely on Rule 56 motions

A well-prepared Rule 56 motion can narrow or dispose of claims early, reduce trial time and costs, and focus remaining issues for trial. It forces parties to crystallize evidence and legal arguments and gives the court a mechanism to resolve claims where no factual dispute exists.

Typical users and participants

Who prepares and responds to Rule 56 motions in practice, and who reviews the resulting orders.

Plaintiff or defense counsel preparing dispositive briefing and supporting evidence.
In-house counsel coordinating document production, witness statements, and litigation strategy.
Pro se litigants filing or opposing motions with court-provided local-rule guidance.

Overview of participants who use the motion at different stages of litigation.

Signatory and user roles

Plaintiff's Counsel

Prepares opposing-party evidence or response, identifies disputed facts, and files affidavits or declarations to preserve factual disputes for trial. Counsel coordinates exhibits and ensures compliance with local filing and service rules.

Defense Counsel

Files the motion for summary judgment supported by admissible evidence, frames the legal issues for the court, and drafts proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law when required.

Core elements to include in a professional Rule 56 filing

A complete summary judgment package combines a concise legal memorandum, a statement of facts tied to evidence, admissible exhibits, sworn declarations, and clear relief language so the court can rule on legal sufficiency without a trial.

Notice of Motion

Identify the specific relief sought, the supporting memorandum, and the hearing date or local-rule notice requirements for the motion.

Legal Memorandum

State the legal standard, cite controlling authority, apply law to undisputed facts, and explain why judgment as a matter of law is appropriate.

Statement of Facts

Present numbered, concise facts with direct citation to admissible exhibits, showing there is no triable issue of material fact.

Supporting Evidence

Attach key exhibits: deposition excerpts, contracts, emails, invoices, expert reports, and other documents supporting factual statements.

Affidavits / Declarations

Use sworn declarations under 28 U.S.C. §1746 or notarized affidavits to authenticate facts when appropriate and admissible.

Proposed Order

Provide a proposed order stating the precise judgment or relief the movant requests to assist judicial entry if the court agrees.

Step-by-step: preparing and filing a Rule 56 motion

Follow an evidence-first approach: assemble admissible materials, draft focused facts, and meet all local rules for timing and service before filing the motion.

01

Assemble Evidence: Collect admissible exhibits and sworn declarations supporting undisputed facts.
02

Draft Briefing: Write a concise memorandum and a separate statement of undisputed facts with citations.
03

File and Serve: File in accordance with local e-filing rules and serve all parties per court requirements.
04

Prepare Reply: Track opposition deadlines and prepare a reply addressing only new factual or legal points.

How to configure an online filing workflow

Map document preparation to e-filing steps: authentication, templates, conditional exhibits, routing, and audit logs to meet court and opposing-party requirements.

Field	Configuration
Authentication Method	Use email link or SMS code for signer identity; consider higher assurance for declarations.
Templates	Save standard motion language and local-rule footers to ensure consistent filings.
Conditional Exhibits	Show exhibit upload fields only when referenced in the facts to reduce errors.
Audit Trail	Enable IP, timestamps, and signer history to support authenticity and chain-of-custody.

Motion lifecycle from filing to judicial decision

Understand the sequential flow so filings meet timing, service, and evidentiary rules and the court has what it needs to rule without a trial.

Preparation: Gather admissible evidence and draft concise facts and legal argument.
Filing and Service: E-file the motion and serve opposing counsel per court and local rules.
Response and Reply: Opposition files evidence showing triable issues; movant may reply to new points.
Decision: Judge issues order granting, denying, or granting partial summary judgment.

Common timing and deadline considerations

Timing for summary judgment filings varies by court; federal rules and local rules govern when motions may be filed and how long opponents have to respond.

Filing Window:

Many federal courts permit motions up to 30 days after discovery closes; check Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and local rules.

Response Deadline:

Typical response periods range from 14 to 30 days under local rules; confirm the district schedule.

Reply Deadline:

Reply briefs often due 7 to 14 days after the response; local rules control exact timing.

Hearing Notice:

Some courts schedule oral argument; others decide on papers. Verify the court’s preference.

Extension Requests:

File stipulations or motions to extend before deadlines to avoid procedural defaults.

Key milestones in the summary judgment timeline

A sequential view of critical stages helps coordinate discovery, briefing, and court scheduling for an efficient dispositive-motion process.

01

Prepare Motion

Assemble exhibits, declarations, and a concise statement of undisputed facts.

02

File and Serve

Submit to the clerk and serve all parties per the applicable local rules.

03

Opposition Filed

Opponent must present contrary evidence showing a triable issue of material fact.

04

Court Ruling

Judge issues order resolving claims or setting issues for trial.

Common pitfalls to avoid when preparing a Rule 56 motion

Relying on unsworn statements or unauthenticated exhibits that the court will exclude from consideration.
Submitting a fact statement without direct citations to exhibits and page or line numbers for verification.
Filing late or without complying with complex local format, length, or sealing requirements.
Addressing tangential legal issues instead of focusing on whether material facts are genuinely disputed.

Consequences of procedural or evidentiary errors

Motion Denied: No dispositive relief

Sanctions: Monetary or case-level penalties

Evidence Excluded: Key proof may be rejected

Waived Objections: Failure to timely object harms appeal

Case Delay: Additional discovery or hearings

Appeal Issues: Weakened appellate posture

Essential case and document details to include

Court Name: Complete court title

Docket Number: Exact case number

Party Names: Plaintiff and defendant

Motion Title: Clear caption

Exhibit Index: Numbered list

Signature Date: MM/DD/YYYY

How Rule 56 differs from other pretrial dispositive motions

A concise comparison highlighting differences in standard, timing, and the type of evidence courts may consider between summary judgment and common dismissal motions.

Criteria	Rule 56 Motion	Rule 12(b)(6) Motion
Burden	no triable fact	plausibility only
Evidence Considered	admissible evidence allowed	complaint allegations only
Timing	post-discovery typical	early-stage typical
Standard	no genuine dispute	failure to state claim

Comparison: eSignature vendors for preparing and exchanging motion materials

Vendor feature and pricing snapshot for eSignature platforms commonly used to collect declarations, signatures, and authenticated exhibits. signNow appears first per vendor ordering rules.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies	Varies	Varies

Practical examples: how a Rule 56 package can resolve issues

Two brief scenarios show how focused facts and admissible evidence enable courts to rule on summary judgment motions without trial.

Defense Motion Succeeds

Movant limited discovery and produced contract showing no breach

Court considered admission and contract language only
The judge granted summary judgment on liability because no reasonable jury could find a breach given the admitted contract terms.

Partial Plaintiff Victory

Plaintiff submitted deposition excerpts and invoices proving a material dispute on damages

Defendant failed to contradict key records
The court granted partial summary judgment on liability while reserving damages for trial.

Technical and platform considerations for e-submission

Check platform file formats, authentication options, and integration needs before gathering and exchanging evidence and declarations electronically.

Supported Formats: PDF and DOCX are standard
Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365
Security: TLS in transit, AES-256 at rest

Frequently asked questions about Rule 56 motions

Answers to common procedural and evidentiary questions encountered when preparing, filing, or opposing a summary judgment motion.

Need help? Contact support

What is the legal standard?
A motion succeeds if there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; courts view evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.
May I rely on affidavits?
Yes if affidavits are sworn and based on personal knowledge, contain admissible matter, and comply with 28 U.S.C. §1746 or are notarized. Hearsay within an affidavit may be excluded if it lacks an exception.
Can I file before discovery ends?
Often yes, but many courts limit motions until discovery concludes; parties sometimes request short postponements under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) if additional discovery is needed to oppose.
How should exhibits be authenticated?
Provide sworn testimony, deposition excerpts, business-record certification, or witness declarations tying documents to admissible sources to satisfy authentication requirements.
Are electronic signatures acceptable?
Electronic signatures and e-signed declarations are generally acceptable under ESIGN and UETA when authenticable and retained; specific court rules may require original notarization for certain affidavits.
What happens after denial or grant?
If granted, the court disposes of the claim or issue; if denied, parties proceed to trial or further discovery. Either outcome may prompt interlocutory appeals in limited circumstances.

Explore Templates

Connecticut Quitclaim Deed Contract Documents Town of New London California Last Will and Testament Letter to Lienholder to Notify of Trust New Hampshire Deed Restriction Deed of Preservation Easement and Agreement

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now