Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Sec v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores Inc., 760 F.2d 945

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

PROXY STATEMENT

CARTER HAWLEY HALE STORES, INC.

3880 North Mission Road
Los Angeles, California 90031

The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. (the “Company”) to be used at the Special Meeting of Stockholders on Friday, February 25, 1994 (the “Special Meeting”). This Proxy Statement and the enclosed form of proxy are being sent to stockholders on or about February 5, 1994.

At the Special Meeting, stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the issuance of up to 11,792,453 shares (the “Conversion Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $.01 per share (“Common Stock”), issuable upon conversion of $143,750,000 of the Company’s 6¼% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2000 (the “Notes”), for purposes of listing such shares on the New York Stock Exchange (the “Proposal”).

Any stockholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time prior to its exercise at the Special Meeting by giving notice of such revocation either personally or in writing to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s executive offices, by subsequently executing and delivering another proxy or by voting in person at the Special Meeting.

The Board of Directors of the Company believes that the approval of the Proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and recommends that the stockholders approve the Proposal.

VOTING

Shares represented by duly executed and unrevoked proxies in the enclosed form received by the Board of Directors will be voted at the Special Meeting in accordance with the specifications made therein by the stockholders, unless authority to do so is withheld. If no specification is made, shares represented by duly executed and unrevoked proxies in the enclosed form will be voted FOR the approval of the Proposal.

The cost of preparing, assembling and mailing the proxy materials will be borne by the Company. The Company has not retained any firm to solicit proxies.

Only holders of record at the close of business on February 3, 1994 (the “Record Date”) of the Common Stock and the Company’s Series A Exchangeable Preferred Stock, $.01 par value (the “Preferred Stock”), will be entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 45,582,865 shares of Common Stock and 870,861 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding.

Vote Required: The approval of the Proposal requires a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the Special Meeting, provided that the total vote cast on the Proposal represents over 50% in interest of all outstanding Common Stock and Preferred Stock, voting as a single class.

The stockholders of the Company have no dissenters’ or appraisal rights in connection with the Proposal.

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT OWNERSHIP

Principal Stockholders

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Percent of Class
Zell/Chilmark Fund, L.P.
Two North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606
24,800,866(1) 54.4%
Mellon Bank, N.A., as Trustee for First Plaza Group Trust
One Mellon Center
Pittsburgh, PA 15258
2,500,000(2) 5.5%

Management Ownership

Name of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Percent of Class Beneficially Owned
Leobardo F. Estrada10,000(1)*
Sidney R. Petersen10,825(1)(2)*
Terry Savage11,000(1)(3)*
David M. Schulte24,800,866(4)54.4%(4)
Sanford Shkolnik24,920,866(5)54.7%(5)
Robert M. Solow10,000(1)*
Dennis C. Stanfill12,710(1)(6)*
James D. Woods13,000(1)*
Samuel Zell24,800,866(7)54.4%(7)
David L. Dworkin666,666(8)*
Philip M. Hawley480,000(9)1.1%
William Podany36,666(10)*
Patricia A. Warren0*
Janet Grove13,333(11)*
James Rosenthal13,333(11)*
Edwin J. Holman5,293(12)*
Larry G. Peterson3,722(13)*
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (20 persons)25,758,548(4)(5)(7)(14)56.5%

The Company entered into a Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 14, 1993, with Salomon Brothers Inc. under which the Company issued the Notes on December 21, 1993 in a private placement.

THE PROPOSAL

Background

The Notes are convertible at the option of the holders at any time after 90 days following the date of initial issuance and prior to maturity, at an initial conversion price of $12.19 per share, subject to adjustment from time to time upon the occurrence of certain events.

Description of the Notes

General. The Notes bear interest at the rate of 6¼%, payable semiannually on December 31 and June 30 of each year, commencing June 30, 1994. The Notes are due on December 31, 2000 and are issuable only in registered form, without coupons, in denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof.

Registration Rights. The Company agreed to file and maintain a shelf registration statement for the resale of the Notes and the Common Stock issuable upon conversion thereof.

Conversion. The holder of any Note has the right, exercisable at any time after 90 days following the date of original issuance thereof and prior to maturity, to convert the principal amount thereof into shares of Common Stock at $12.19, subject to adjustment.

Optional Redemption. The Notes may be redeemed at the option of the Company, in whole or from time to time in part, on and after December 31, 1998, on not less than 15 nor more than 60 days’ notice.

Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, each holder of Notes will have the right, at the holder’s option, to require the Company to purchase all or any part of the holder’s Notes.

Subordination of Notes. The Notes are subordinate in right of payment to all existing and future Senior Debt and pari passu in right of payment to all existing and future Senior Subordinated Indebtedness.

Events of Default and Notice Thereof. The term “Event of Default” includes failure to pay interest or principal when due, failure to perform covenants, default on other indebtedness, certain judgments, and certain bankruptcy or reorganization events.

Description of Capital Stock. The authorized capital stock consists of 100 million shares of Common Stock and 25 million shares of preferred stock. The Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Pacific Stock Exchange. The Preferred Stock is not listed for trading on any national securities exchange.

Warrants. Each Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of Common Stock through October 8, 1999 at a purchase price of $17 per share, subject to adjustment from time to time.

Possible Dilutive Effect. Conversion of the Notes into shares of Common Stock would result in an increase in the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding and could have a dilutive effect on book value, earnings per share, and voting power.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors is not aware of any other matters to be presented at the meeting.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

As stated in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 1993 Annual Meeting, the date by which stockholder proposals must have been received by the Company to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for the 1994 Annual Meeting was December 30, 1993.

INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE

The following documents filed by the Company with the Commission are incorporated into this Proxy Statement by reference: Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fifty-two week period ended January 30, 1993, as amended by Annual Report on Form 10-K/A No. 1 dated May 14, 1993; and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the thirteen-week periods ended May 1, 1993, July 31, 1993, and October 30, 1993.

Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. 2/4/94

Authorized Signer Name

Signature

Date

Title

Enter text✕

What Sec v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores Inc., 760 F.2d 945 is and why it matters

Sec v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores Inc., 760 F.2d 945 is a published federal appellate opinion identified by its reporter citation. This page focuses on how to locate, read, and cite the decision reliably, and on the document elements researchers should extract for briefs, memoranda, and academic work. It highlights procedural posture, citation format, and steps to confirm whether the opinion remains good law before relying on it in litigation or scholarship. Always consult the official reporter or court docket for the controlling text and any subsequent history.

Why this citation is useful for legal research and drafting

Accurate identification of Sec v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores Inc., 760 F.2d 945 helps you find the primary opinion, check subsequent history, and determine precedential weight. Correct citation and context reduce briefing errors, support persuasive argument, and ensure compliance with local citation conventions when submitting filings or academic citations.

Why this citation is useful for legal research and drafting

Who commonly consults this opinion

Common users who consult this opinion include litigation attorneys, appellate counsel, law clerks, academic researchers, and students.

  • Litigation attorneys seeking precedent or persuasive authority for briefs and motions.
  • Appellate practitioners verifying procedural posture, standards of review, and analogies for argument.
  • Law students and researchers preparing case briefs, classwork, or scholarly commentary.

Confirm applicability to your jurisdiction and research question before relying on the opinion in briefs or regulatory filings.

Essential components to capture when briefing the opinion

A professional case brief of Sec v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores Inc., 760 F.2d 945 should record facts, procedural posture, legal question, holding, court reasoning, and the disposition to support precise citation and clear argumentation.

Facts

Summarize only those facts essential to the legal issue; avoid extraneous narrative and note disputed versus undisputed material facts for clarity.

Procedural History

Record prior proceedings, lower court rulings, and how the case arrived at the appellate level so readers can trace the procedural posture.

Issue

Frame the legal question the court resolved in a single sentence reflecting the precise rule at stake and the party alignment.

Holding

Extract the court's holding precisely; separate holdings controlling the outcome from broader dicta or commentary in the opinion.

Reasoning

Note the court's core legal analysis, statutory or precedent reliance, and any tests applied that could guide analogous arguments.

Disposition

State the final outcome (affirmed, reversed, remanded) and any instructions the court gave to the lower court for further proceedings.

Key citation fields to record for the opinion

Citation: 760 F.2d 945
Court: Appellate court name
Decision Date: MM/DD/YYYY
Docket Number: Court docket identifier
Parties: Full party names
Reporter Info: Parallel citations if any

Step-by-step: read, extract, and cite the opinion correctly

Follow these sequential steps to locate the authoritative text, extract the holding, and apply the citation properly in court filings or research.

  • 01
    Locate Opinion: Retrieve full text from the official reporter or the court docket.
  • 02
    Identify Facts: Summarize salient facts relevant to your legal issue and factual analogies.
  • 03
    Pinpoint Holding: Extract the controlling holding, distinguishing it from dicta or obiter.
  • 04
    Cite Properly: Format the citation per Bluebook or local rules and include page pinpoints.

How to set up an electronic workflow for working with the opinion

When handling Sec v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores Inc., 760 F.2d 945 electronically, configure tools to capture citation metadata, make precise annotations, and export excerpts for brief drafting.

Field Configuration
Source Official reporter or court docket
OCR Run OCR on scanned PDFs for text searchability
Metadata extraction Capture citation, court, date, and docket automatically
Export format PDF/A or DOCX with page pinpoints

Where to file or submit documents that cite the opinion

Citations to Sec v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores Inc., 760 F.2d 945 belong in briefs, memoranda, and appendices filed with courts and served on opposing counsel according to local filing and service rules.

  • Add to Brief: Place citation in the argument section with a pinpointed page reference.
  • Serve Counsel: Include cited opinion in the filing package served on opposing counsel.
  • File with Court: Comply with court electronic filing rules and local formatting requirements.
  • Archive Copy: Save a certified copy or reporter-page image for the court record.

Tools and integrations to manage case documents securely

Platforms used to manage opinions should support searchable PDFs, citation metadata, export formats, and integrations with legal research tools.

  • File Formats: PDF, PDF/A, DOCX supported
  • Integrations: Salesforce, Microsoft 365, NetSuite, Google Workspace
  • Compliance: TLS 1.2/1.3; AES-256; SOC 2 Type II; HIPAA

Timing considerations when relying on the opinion in filings

Deadlines for citing or appealing based on this opinion depend on the court's briefing schedule and local rules; always confirm filing dates with the clerk and docket before preparing submissions.

Briefing Deadlines:

Follow the court's set schedule for opening and reply briefs.

Appeal Timing:

Locate applicable appeal period in the governing rules before filing.

Citations Update:

Shepardize or use citator services before finalizing citation.

Filing Format:

Adhere to local page limits and formatting requirements.

Preserve Issues:

Raise relied-on legal theories at the appropriate stage to preserve review.

Common mistakes when preparing materials that cite this opinion

  • Mismatching the reporter citation and page pinpoints leads to confusion and may force clerks to reject or question a filing.
  • Failing to check subsequent history or negative treatment can result in reliance on overruled or limited authority.
  • Treating dicta as binding precedent can produce weak legal arguments and invite rebuttal from opposing counsel.
  • Neglecting local citation or filing rules (formatting, service, seal requirements) risks procedural sanctions or loss of filing acceptance.

Consequences of incorrect citation or misuse

Sanctions: Court sanctions possible
Waiver: Issues may be waived
Adverse Ruling: Credibility harm in proceedings
Ethics: Potential ethical violation
Delay: Briefing and hearing delays
Reputational: Loss of professional credibility

How this published opinion compares with other judicial document types

Judicial writings differ in precedential weight and citation form; compare published opinions, memorandum orders, and unpublished dispositions to select appropriate authority for briefs.

Criteria Document Type Precedential Citation Form
Precedential Weight published opinion full reporter citation
Use in Briefs memorandum order limited cite with caution
Availability unpublished opinion local rule dependent
Treatment slip opinion varies check subsequent history

Frequently asked questions about locating, citing, and using the opinion

Answers to common questions about finding the opinion, confirming its current status, and citing it correctly in briefs and academic work.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users