Establishing secure connection… Loading editor… Preparing document…
Navigation

Fill and Sign the Contractor S Application for Payment in Form

Fill and Sign the Contractor S Application for Payment in Form

How it works

Open the document and fill out all its fields.
Apply your legally-binding eSignature.
Save and invite other recipients to sign it.

Rate template

4.8
52 votes
REPORT of the PROCEEDINGS OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES September 22-23, 1982 Wash~ton, 1982 I D.C. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE ~TEDSTATESCOURTS William E. Foley Director REPORT of the PROCEEDINGS OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES September 22-23, 1982 Washington, D.C. 1982 THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES, 28 U.S.C. 331 §331. JUDIC1AL CONfERENCE Of THE UN1TED STATES The Chief Justice of the United States shall summon annually the chief judge of each judicial circuit, the chief judge of the Court of Claims, the chief judge of the Court of Cus· toms and Patent Appeals, and a district judge from each judicial circuit to a conference at such time and place in the United States as he may designate. He shall preside at such conference which shall be known as the Judicial Conference of the United States. Special sessions of the conference may be called by the Chief Justice at such times and places as he may designate. The district judge to be summoned from each judicial circuit shall be chosen by the circuit and district judges of the circuit at the annual judicial conference of the circuit held pursuant to section 333 of this title and shall serve as a member of the conference for three successive years, except that in the year following the enactment of this amended section the judges in the first, fourth, seventh, and tenth circuits shall choose a district judge to serve for one year. the judges in the second. firth. and eighth circuits shall choose a district judge to serve for two years and the judges in the third, sixth. ninth, and District of Columbia circuits shall choose a district judge to serve for three years. If the chief judge of any circuit or the district judge chosen by the judges of the circuit is unable to attend, the Chief lustice may summon any other circuit or district judge from such circuit. If the chief judge of the Court of Claims or the chief judge of the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals is unable to attend, the Chief Justice may summon an associate judge of such court. Every judge summoned shall attend, and, unless excused by the Chief Justice, shall remain throughout the sessions of the conference and advise as to the needs of his circuit or court and as to any matters in respect of which the administra­ tion of justice in the courts of the United States may be improved. The conference shall make a comprehensive survey of the condition of business in the courts of the United States and prepare plans for assignment of judges to or from cir­ cuits or districts where necessary. and shall submit suggestions to the various courts, in the interest of uniformity and expedition of business. The conference shall also carry on a continuous study of the operation and effect of the general rules of practice and procedure now or hereafter in use as prescribed by the Supreme Court for the other courts of the United States pursuant to law. Such changes in and additions to those rules as the conference may deem desirable to promote simplicity in procedure, fairness in administration, the just determination of litigation, and the e1im· ination of unjustifiable expense and delay shall be recommended by the conference from time to time to the Supreme Court for its consideration and aoopti(l1, modification or rejection, in acmrdance with law. The Attorney General shall, upon request of the Chief Justice, report to such conference on matters relating to the business of the several coutts of the United States, with par­ ticular reference to cases to which the United States is a party. The Chief Justice shall submit to Congress an annual report of the proceedings of the ludicial Conference and its recommendations for legislation. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES September 22-23, 1982 Page Call of the Conference • . • • . • . . . . • • • . . . . . . • . . • • . . • . Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts ...•••.•.••••.•• Judicial Business of the Courts •• • . • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. • • • • • . . • • . . • • • Committee on the Judicial Branch. • . • . • . • • • • • • • . • • • • • Judicial Salary Control Act of 1981 . . • • • . • • • . • . . • • • Commission on the Bicentennial of the Constitution. • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • • • Committee on Court Administration •••.•••••••••••••• Additional Judgeships. • • . • • • • • • . • • • . . • • • • • . • • • • United States Immigration Court. • • • . • • • . • • • • • • • • • Social Security Court • • . • • • • • . . . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • Judicial Review of the Denial of Veterans Claims. . • . • • • . • • • • • • • . • . • • • . • • • • • Contribution and Claims Reduction in Anti trust Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Congressional Redistricting. • • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • Review of Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board. • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • Judicial Restraint Act •••••.••••••••••••••••••• . Jurisdiction of Bankruptcy Courts • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • Venue in Courts of Appeals and District Courts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . National Court of Appeals and Intercircuit Tribunal of the United States Courts of Appeals ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • National Judicial Study Commission. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Technical Amendments to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1364 •••••••••••••••• Residences of Clerks of Court. • • • • . • . . . • • • • • • • • • • Places of Holding Court •••••••••••••••••••••••• Waiver of Overpayments. • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • Court Interpreters Act • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Travel Regulations for Justices and Judges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 57 57 58 59 59 60 60 60 63 64 65 66 67 67 68 68 69 71 71 72 72 72 73 73 74 Court Administration (Cont'd) Litigation Expenses of Judicial Officers. • . . . • . . . . . • • Miscellaneous Fees ..••..••..... , • • . • . . • . . • • • • • Space Utilization Survey. . . • • . . . . . . . . • . • • • • • • • • • Authorization of Temporary Personnel for Judges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • . . . . • • . . Court Reporters. . • . . . . . • • . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • • . • • . Changes in Authorization and Compensation of Supporting Clerical Staff .........•.••....••• Committee on the Budget. . . . . • . . . . . . . . • . . . • . . . . . . . Appropriations for the Fiscal Year 1984 . • . . • . • • . . • • • Supporting Personnel for Senior Judges .......•••... Judicial Ethics Committee .•....••.•••...........•. Activities of the Committee. • • • . • . . . • . . . • . . • • . . . Reporting Form and Instructions. • . • • • . . . . • . • . • . • • Advisory Committee on Codes of Conduct • . • . • . • . • • . . • • Activities of the Committee. • . • . • • • . • . • • • • • • • . . • Applicability of Codes of Conduct. • . • . . • • • • • • • • • • • Model Codes of Conduct for Various Judicial Employees. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • Senior Judges Serving as Arbitrators •••••••••••••.• Committee on Intercircuit Assignments. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure •••••.•..••.•••••••.••••••••••• Bankruptcy Rul es • • • • • • • . . • • . • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • Criminal Rules. . . . . . . . . • . • . • • . • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • 75 76 77 77 79 80 80 80 81 81 81 82 83 83 83 84 84 84 85 85 85 Civil Rules. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 Appellate Rules . • • . . . . • . . • • • • • . • . . . • • • • . • . • • • Statement of Operating Procedures. • • • . • . • . . • • • • • • Committee on the Administration of the Probation System • • . • • • . . . . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Sentencing Institutes ••..•.....•••.•••••••••••• Sentencing Reform. • • • . . • • • • • • . . . • . • • . • . . • • • • • Committee on the Administration of the Bankruptcy System. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . . • • • • • • • • Survey of the Need for Bankruptcy Judges. • . • • • • • • • • Arrangements for Bankruptcy Judges. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Guidelines for Chapter 13 Administration. • • • • • • • • • • • Jurisdictional Conflicts. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Bankruptcy Appeals in District Courts. . • • • • • . • • • • • • Committee on the Administration of the Federal Magistrates System. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Jurisdiction of Magistrates • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Qualification Standards and Selection Procedures ••••••••••••••••••••••••• Changes in Magistrates Positions. • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • 86 86 vi 87 87 87 88 88 88 90 91 91 92 92 93 94 Committee to Implement the Criminal Justi ce Act •. . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Appointments and Payments. . . . • • . . . • • . . . . . • . . .. Budget Requests - Federal Public Defenders ...••.•.•.••.•...... . . • . . . . . . . . .. Grant Requests - Community Defender Organizations. . . . . • • . . . • • . • • . . . • • . . . • . • • . . •• Funding for the Federal Public Defender in the Southern District of Florida. • • . • . • • . • • . . . .• Guidelines • . • . • . • • • • . . • • • . • • • . • . • • . . . . . . • . •. Committee on the Administration of the Criminal Law. . . . . • • . • • • • . • . . • . . • . . . • • . . .. Interlocutory Appeals • • • • • • • • • • • . . • • . . . . . • • . . •• Sealing of Records Under the Youth Corrections Act. . . . . . . . . . • . . . . • • . . . • • • • • • . .. Amendments to the Smuggling Statute. • . • . . . . • . . . •. Commitment of Mentally Incompetent Offenders ••.••••••.••.•••...•••.•••..••... Committee on the Operation of the Jury System .•••..•••..••...•.•..•.•..•...••. Judges' Manual for the Management of Com plex Criminal Jury Cases • • • . . • . . . . . • • . • •• Periodic Reporting - Jury Selection. . • • • • . • • . • • • • •• Voir Dire Examination •••••.••••..••...•••••.•• Witnesses Before Grand Juries. • • . • • • . . • • • . . • • • . •. Tax Treatment of Jurors' Attendance Fees. • . • • . . • • •. Juror Qualification Questionnaire •...••••.•••••••• Implementation Committee on Admission of Attorneys to Federal Practice. • • • • • • • • • . • • . • • •• Committee on Pacific Territories. • • • • . . . • • . . . • • . . • •• Committee on Judgeship Vacancies . • • • • • • . • • • • . • . • • •. Ad Hoc Committee on the Disposition of Court Records • . • . . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • . • • • • • • •. Records Disposition Program and Schedule. . • . • . • • • .. Termination of the Work of the Committee •••••••••• Elections . . .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .... Committee to Review Circuit Council Conduct and Disability Orders. • • • • . • • • • • • . • • . • • •• Committee on the Selection of Law Clerks. . . . • . . . . • . . .• Ad Hoc Committee on Judicial Review Provisions in Regulatory Reform 107 107 108 109 11 0 III III 112 112 112 113 113 113 114 114 115 115 116 116 117 117 118 118 119 119 120 120 Legisla ti on.. .. .. .. . . .. .. . .. . . .. .. .. . .. . . .. . . . .. .. .. . . . .. . .. ... 120 Courtroom Facilities .•••••••••••••••.•••.•••.•••• Pretermission of Terms of the Courts of Appeals............................. Release of Conference Action. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 121 vii 121 121 REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES September 22-23, 1982 The Judicial Conference of the United States convened on September 22, 1982, pursuant to the call of the Chief Justice of the United States, issued under 28 U.S.C. 331, and continued in session on September 23rd. The Chief Justice presided and the following members of the Conference were present: First Circuit: Chief Judge Frank M. Coffin Judge W. Arthur Garrity, Jr., District of Massachusetts Second Circuit: Chief Judge Wilfred Feinberg Chief Judge Constance B. Motley, Southern District of New York Third Circuit: Chief Judge Collins J. Seitz Chief Judge Gerald .T. Weber, Western District of Pennsylvania Fourth Circuit: Chief Judge Harrison L. Winter Judge Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Eastern District of Virginia Fifth Circuit: Chief Judge Charles Clark Chief Judge John V. Singleton, Jr., Southern District of Texas Sixth Circuit: Chief Judge George C. Edwards, Jr. Chief Judge Frank J. Battisti, Northern District of Ohio 56 Seventh Circuit: Chief Judge Walter J. Cummings Chief Judge John W. Reynolds, Eastern District of Wisconsin Eighth Circuit: Chief Judge Donald P. Lay Judge Albert G. Schatz, District of Nebraska Ninth Circuit: Chief Judge James R. Browning Judge Manuel L. Real, Central District of California Tenth Circuit: Chief Judge Oliver Seth Chief Judge Luther B. Eubanks, Western District of Oklahoma Eleventh Circuit: Chief Judge John C. Godbold Judge William C. O'Kelley, Northern District of Georgia District of Columbia: Chief Judge Spottswood W. Robinson, III Chief Judge Aubrey E. Robinson, Jr., District of Columbia Court of Claims: Chief Judge Daniel M. Friedman Court of Customs and Patent Appeals: Chief Judge Howard T. Markey Circuit Judges Irving R. Kaufman, Anthony M. Kennedy, Otto R. Skopil Jr., Edward A. Tamm, and Gerald B. Tjoflatj Senior Circuit Judges Clement F. Haynsworth, Jr. and Carl McGowan; Senior District Judges Elmo B. Hunter and Thoma~ J. MacBride; and District Judges T. Emmet Clarie, Robert E 57 DeMascio, Edward T. Gignoux and Alexander Harvey II, attended all or some of the sessions of the Conference. The Deputy Attorney General of the United States, Honorable Edward C. Schmults, and the Solicitor General of the United States, Honorable Rex E. Lee, addressed the Conference briefly on matters of mutual interest to the Department of Justice and the Conference. William E. Foley, Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; Joseph F. Spaniol, Jr., Deputy Director; James E. Macklin, Assistant Director; William J. Weller, Legislative Affairs Officer; Michael J. Remington, Deputy Legislative Affairs Officer; Deborah H. Kirk, Chief, Office of Management Review; and Charles W. Nihan, Deputy Director of the Federal Judicial Center, attended sessions of the Conference. Mark W. Cannon, Administrative Assistant to the Chief Justice, and John Yoder of the Supreme Court staff, attended sessions of the Conference. The Director of the Federal JUdicial Center, A. Leo Levin, presented the Center's Annual Report. REPORT OF THE DffiECTOR OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS The Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, William E. Foley, submitted to the Conference the Annual Report of the Director for the year ended June 30, 1982. The Conference authorized the Director to release the Annual Report immediately in preliminary form and to revise and supplement the final printed edition. Separate reports on payments under the Equal Access to Justice Act and on the operation of equal employment opportunity plans in the courts, filed by the Director, were also received by the Conference and authorized to be released. JUDICIAL BUSINESS OF THE COURTS Mr. Foley reported that appeals docketed in the United States courts of appeals during the year ended June 30, 1982 increased 6 percent to a record 27,947 appeals filed. During the year the courts of appeals terminated 27,984 appeals, an 58 increase of 11.6 percent over the previous year and 38 appeals more than the number filed. As a result, the number of appeals pending on June 30, 1982 rleclined for the first time since 1958 to 21,510 pending appeals. Civil cases filed in the United States district courts during the year ended June 30, 1982 were 206,193, an increase of 14.2 percent over the 180,576 civil cases filed during the previous year. There were 189,473 civil cases terminated, 6.5 percent more than the previous year, and the pending civil caseload increased 8.9 percent to a record 205,434 cases as of June 30, 1982. Criminal cases filed in the district courts in 1982 climbed to 32,682, an increase of 4.5 percent over 1981. There were 31,889 criminal cases closed during the year, and on June 30, 1982 there were 16,659 criminal cases pending, an increase of 5.1 percent. During the year prosecutions for marijuana drug violations increased 39.9 percent and all other drug related cases increased 11.5 percent. Prosecutions under laws relating to weapons and firearms continued to increase during the year, rising 36.2 percent. Prosecutions for forgery and counterfeiting also rose substantially increasing 17.6 percent, while auto theft prosecutions increased 21.0 percent. During the year ended June 30, 1982 there were 367,866 bankruptcy cases, representing 527,342 separate estates, filed in the United States bankrupcy courts. An additional 469 estates in cases originally filed under the Bankruptcy Act prior to October I, 1979 were reopened. The bankruptcy courts thus received 527,811 new bankruptcy cases during the year, an increase of 1.7 percent. This is a leveling off in the filing of bankruptcy estates from the increase of 43.8 percent in 1981 and 59.4 percent in 1980. There were 412,852 bankruptcy estates closed during the year, an increase of 28.3 percent over the previous year, but almost 215,000 estates less than the number filed. As a result the number of estates pending on the dockets of the bankruptcy courts on June 30, 1982 increased 18.6 percent to a record 723,871. JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTR[CT LITIGATION A written statement filed with the Conference by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation indicated that during the year ended June 30, 1982 the Panel had acted on 683 civil 59 actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407. Of that number, 454 actions were centralized for consolidated pretrial proceedings with 229 actions already pending in the various transferee districts at the time of transfer. The Panel denied transfer of 155 civil actions. Since its creation in 1968 the Panel has transferred 11,094 civil actions for centralized pretrial proceedings in carrying out its responsibilities. As of June 30, 1982, approximately 8,814 cases had been remanded for trial, reassigned within the transferee district, or terminated in the transferee court. On June 30, 1982 there were 2,280 transferred civil actions being processed by transferee judges. COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIAL BRANCH Judge Irving R. Kaufman, Chairman of the Committee on the Judicial Branch, submitted the Committee's report. JUDICIAL SALARY CONTROL ACT OF 1981 S. 1847, 97th Congress, is a bill to prohibit any future increases in salaries of Federal judges absent an affirmative record vote in both Houses of Congress, and to require an annual review by both Houses of Congress of all standing SUbstantive program authorizations for judicial branch activities. The Conference in March 1982 (Conf. Rept. p. 5) recognized the ultimate final authority of Congress to set judicial salaries, but expressed its preference for the draft legislation to create a biennial commission on judicial salaries previously approved by the Conference. The Conference further agreed that the bill's objectives with respect to annual program authorizations are unnecessary and unwise. Judge Kaufman stated that the Committee had again reviewed this proposed legislation and concluded that the Judicial Conference should renew its opposition to the passage of S. 1847 or any successor legislation. Upon the recommendation of the Committee the Conference adopted the following resolution: Resolved, that the Judicial Conference of the United States opposes the passage of S. 1847 or of any bill replacing or resembling it, or flO providing for annual program oversight of judicial operations. COl'vtl'lHSSION ON THE BICENTENNIAL OF THE CONSTITUTION Judge Kaufman stated that the Committee had unanimously endorsed pending legislation, S. 2671, 97th Congress, which would establish a Commission on the Bicentennial of the Constitution to promote and coordinate activities to commemorate the wisdom and endurance of that document. The Committee noted that the bill would provide for the appointment of Commission members by the President from lists of nominees submitted by the Speaker of the House, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate and the Chief

Valuable suggestions for completing your ‘Contractor S Application For Payment In’ online

Are you fatigued by the burdens of managing paperwork? Look no further than airSlate SignNow, the premier electronic signature solution for individuals and small to medium-sized businesses. Bid farewell to the monotonous routine of printing and scanning documents. With airSlate SignNow, you can effortlessly complete and sign documents online. Utilize the comprehensive features embedded in this simple and budget-friendly platform and transform your method of document management. Whether you need to approve forms or gather signatures, airSlate SignNow manages it all seamlessly, needing just a few clicks.

Follow these comprehensive instructions:

  1. Access your account or sign up for a complimentary trial with our service.
  2. Click +Create to upload a document from your device, cloud storage, or our template library.
  3. Open your ‘Contractor S Application For Payment In’ in the editor.
  4. Click Me (Fill Out Now) to finalize the document on your end.
  5. Add and designate fillable fields for others (if needed).
  6. Proceed with the Send Invite settings to request digital signatures from additional parties.
  7. Save, print your version, or convert it into a reusable template.

Do not be concerned if you need to collaborate with your coworkers on your Contractor S Application For Payment In or send it for notarization—our solution provides everything necessary to achieve such objectives. Sign up with airSlate SignNow today and elevate your document management to a new standard!

Here is a list of the most common customer questions. If you can’t find an answer to your question, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us.

Need help? Contact Support
Contractors application for payment in template
Contractors application for payment in pdf
Application for payment template Excel
Construction contractors application for payment in pdf
Construction pay application software
Application for payment vs invoice
AIA Application for Payment
Application for payment process
Sign up and try Contractor s application for payment in form
  • Close deals faster
  • Improve productivity
  • Delight customers
  • Increase revenue
  • Save time & money
  • Reduce payment cycles