Establishing secure connection… Loading editor… Preparing document…
Navigation

Fill and Sign the How to Fill Quotation Form

Fill and Sign the How to Fill Quotation Form

How it works

Open the document and fill out all its fields.
Apply your legally-binding eSignature.
Save and invite other recipients to sign it.

Rate template

4.4
65 votes
American Journal of Botany 88(8): 1452–1457. 2001. EFFECTS OF MYCORRHIZAE ON GROWTH AND DEMOGRAPHY OF TALLGRASS PRAIRIE FORBS1 GAIL W. T. WILSON,2,4 DAVID C. HARTNETT,2 MELINDA D. SMITH,2 KERRI KOBBEMAN3 AND Division of Biology, Ackert Hall, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506-5502 USA; and 3 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0036 USA 2 The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis on ramet and genet densities, vegetative growth rates, and flowering of three forb species were studied in native tallgrass prairie in northeastern Kansas. Mycorrhizal activity was experimentally suppressed for six growing seasons on replicate plots in an annually burned and an infrequently burned watershed with the fungicide benomyl. Benomyl reduced mycorrhizal root colonization to an average of 4.2%, approximately a two-thirds reduction relative to controls (13.7% colonization). Mycorrhizae influenced the population structure of these forbs. Although mycorrhizal suppression had no long-term effect on genet densities and no effect on ramet survivorship throughout the growing season, the number of ramets per individual was significantly increased such that ramet densities of all three species were approximately doubled in response to long-term mycorrhizal suppression. Effects of mycorrhizae on ramet growth and reproduction varied among species. Ramet growth rates, biomass, and flowering of Salvia azurea were greater in plots with active mycorrhizal symbiosis, whereas mycorrhizae reduced ramet growth rates and biomass of Artemesia ludoviciana. Aster sericeus ramet growth rates and biomass were unaffected by the fungicide applications, but its flowering was reduced. The pattern of responses of these three species to mycorrhizae differed considerably between the two sites of contrasting fire regime, indicating that the interaction of fire-induced shifts in resource availability and mycorrhizal symbiosis together modulates plant responses and the intensity and patterns of interspecific competition between and among tallgrass prairie grass and forb species. Further, the results indicate that effects of mycorrhizae on community structure are a result of interspecific differences in the balance between direct positive effects of the symbiosis on host plant performance and indirect negative effects mediated through altered competitive interactions. Key words: Artemisia ludoviciana; Aster sericeus; fire; mycorrhizae; Salvia azurea; tallgrass prairie. Studies of the role of biotic interactions in plant species coexistence and community diversity have historically focused on plant–plant or plant–herbivore interactions (Whittaker, 1972; Huntly, 1991; Gurevich et al., 1992). However, the importance of other biotic interactions such as those between plants and soil microorganisms have recently been recognized as well. Because arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are abundant and ubiquitous in almost all natural communities and form associations with .80% of vascular plants (Harley and Harley, 1987; Smith and Read, 1997), it is likely that these symbiotic soil organisms have important influences on plant communities. An adequate understanding of the structure and dynamics of tallgrass prairie and other grassland plant communities requires a sound understanding of the underlying plant demographic processes and life history traits influencing plant population dynamics and how they are influenced by important biotic interactions such as mycorrhizal symbiosis. Benefits from mycorrhizal fungi include improved access to limiting soil resources, especially immobile nutrients such as P, Cu, Zn, and ammonium, and these benefits may be significant. For example, Marschner and Dell (1994) estimated that AM fungal hyphae could accumulate up to 80% of a plant’s Manuscript received 26 May 2000; revision accepted 8 February 2001. This paper is contribution No. 00–430–J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS. This research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant DEB-9317976) and the National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological Research Program (Grant BSR-9011662) at the Konza Prairie Research Natural Area. K. Kobbeman was supported by a NSF Research Experience for Undergraduates award. 4 Author for reprint requests (e-mail: gwtw@ksu.edu). 1 phosphorus requirements and 25% of a plant’s nitrogen requirements. However, the responsiveness of plant species to AM colonization is highly variable (Hetrick, Wilson, and Todd, 1990, 1992; Sanders, Koide, and Shumway, 1995; Wilson and Hartnett, 1998). Some species are obligate mycotrophs (i.e., nutrient acquisition and growth is severely limited in the absence of the symbiosis), while other species do not appear to be P-limited in the field even without mycorrhizal colonization (West, Fitter, and Watkinson, 1993; Wilson and Hartnett, 1998). While most mycorrhizal research has focused on individual host plant responses, recent work has indicated mycorrhizal symbiosis may influence host plant competitive ability, species composition, and diversity in herbaceous communities (e.g., Gange, Brown, and Sinclair, 1993; Wilson and Hartnett, 1997; Zobel and Moora, 1997; Hartnett and Wilson, 1999; Smith, Hartnett, and Wilson, 1999). The tallgrass prairie ecosystems of the eastern Great Plains are composed of a matrix of warm-season C4 and cool-season C3 grasses interspersed with a wide array of forbs. Although virtually all tallgrass prairie plant species form mycorrhizal associations, they differ considerably in their dependence on the symbiosis for nutrient acquisition and growth (Wilson and Hartnett, 1998). The warm-season grasses and most forb species are extremely dependent (obligate mycotrophs), whereas cool-season grasses are significantly less dependent on the symbiosis (facultative mycotrophs) (Hetrick, Wilson, and Todd, 1990; Wilson and Hartnett, 1998). In addition, there is considerable variation in response to mycorrhizal symbiosis among different life history stages (e.g., seedling establishment, vegetative growth, and flowering) within species (Hartnett et al., 1994; Wilson and Hartnett, 1997). Previous research 1452 August 2001] WILSON ET AL.—MYCORRHIZAL EFFECTS ON PRAIRIE FORBS has suggested that, because co-occurring grasses and forbs in tallgrass prairie vary considerably in their dependency on mycorrhizal fungi for growth, variation in the activity of these fungi may strongly influence the competitive balance between obligately mycorrhizal-dependent, facultatively dependent, and nondependent plant species (Hartnett et al., 1993; Hartnett and Wilson, 1999). As a result of differential mycorrhizal dependency of co-occurring species and the strong competitive dominance of the most obligately mycotrophic species mycorrhizal activity in tallgrass prairie enhances dominance and reduces plant species diversity (Hartnett and Wilson, 1999), a response opposite that of some other herbaceous communities (Grime et al., 1987; Gange, Brown, and Farmer, 1990; Gange, Brown, and Sinclair, 1993). Because the competitive dominants in tallgrass prairie are the most strongly mycotrophic plant species, we hypothesized that suppression of AM fungi would increase the growth, reproduction, and relative densities of subdominant species in this system. Furthermore, we predicted that growth and demographic responses of these subdominant species to suppression of AM fungal activity in the field (in the presence of interspecific competition) may differ in direction and magnitude from their responses to mycorrhizal colonization under glasshouse conditions (in the absence of interspecific competition). To test these hypotheses, changes in stem densities, vegetative growth rates, and flowering of selected tallgrass prairie forbs (common, subdominant prairie species) were measured in a tallgrass prairie field experiment in which AM fungi were suppressed for six growing seasons. MATERIALS AND METHODS The experiment was conducted at the Konza Prairie Biological Station, a 3487-ha tallgrass prairie preserve located in the Flint Hills region of eastern Kansas, USA (398059 N, 968359 W). The vegetation of Konza Prairie is representative of the tallgrass prairie biome and is dominated by the perennial, warm-season matrix grasses Andropogon gerardii Vit. Sorghastrum nutans [L.] Nash, A. scoparius Michx., and Panicum virgatum L. (Freeman, 1998; nomenclature follows Great Plains Flora Association, 1986). Interspersed within this matrix is a highly diverse mixture of subdominant warm- and coolseason graminoid, forb, and woody species. Average monthly temperature ranges from a January low of 22.78C to a July high of 26.68C, and average annual total precipitation is 835 mm with 75% falling during the growing season (April–October). Konza Prairie contains 60 watershed units (average size 5 60 ha), each subjected to different fire-frequency (1-, 2-, 4-, 10-, and 20-yr intervals) and grazing treatments (bison [Bos bison], cattle [Bos taurus], or ungrazed). Two ungrazed watersheds, one annually burned in the spring (15 April 6 20 d) and one infrequently burned (approximately every 20 yr), were used in this study. The soil analysis from both these watersheds was typical of Konza soils with 3.5–6.0 mg/g P (bray test 1), pH of 6.0, 2.3–5.0% organic matter, 265–285 mg/g NO3-N, as determined by the Kansas State University Soil Testing Laboratory (Manhattan, Kansas, USA). To assess the AM fungi present in the native soil, spores were isolated from 100 g soil by wet-sieving, decanting, and centrifuging in a 20 : 40 : 60% sucrose density gradient (Daniels and Skipper, 1982). Based on taxonomic criteria of Schenck and Perez (1990), spores of 13 species of mycorrhizal fungi were identified. In terms of spore densities, Glomus aggregatum Schenck & Smith emend. Koske, G. constrictum Trappe, and G. macrocarpum Tulasne & Tulasne were the dominant species of both watersheds. In 1991, ten pairs of 2 3 2 m plots, each placed 2 m apart along a transect, were randomly located on an upland site (shallow, Florence cherty silt loam soil) within each watershed. Mycorrhizal suppression treatments (1benomyl, control) were assigned randomly to one member of each plot pair for a total of ten plots per treatment for each site. Benomyl was applied as a soil drench (7.5 L per plot) at the rate of 1.25 g/m every 2 wk throughout the growing 1453 season to the mycorrhizal suppression plots (1benomyl) beginning in 1991. The control plots received an equivalent amount of water only. Although the potential effects of benomyl on soil microflora components are not entirely known, benomyl is effective in reducing AM fungal colonization in the field (Fitter and Nichols, 1988; Hartnett and Wilson, 1999; Smith, Hartnett, and Wilson, 1999) and has no direct effects on the growth of a wide range of plants (Paul, Aryes, and Wyness, 1989). Moreover, the effects of long-term (8 yr) applications of benomyl on microbial processes in soils from these plots were shown to be small relative to the effects on mycorrhizal root colonization (Smith, Hartnett, and Rice, 2000). In 1996, we assessed the effects of long-term mycorrhizal suppression on growth, flowering, and densities of three perennial forb species: Artemisia ludoviciana Nutt., Aster sericeus Vent., and Salvia azurea Lam. These three species all form multistemmed genets, are widespread across the tallgrass prairie landscape, but are patchily distributed and clearly subdominant to the abundant matrix grasses on tallgrass prairie. Stems (ramets) of each species were counted 7 wk after emergence within each 2 3 2 m plot in each site. Aster sericeus and S. azurea both form multistemmed genets with stems (ramets) arising from a branched caudex (Great Plains Flora Association, 1986). These forb species are characterized by a compact spatial arrangement of ramets within clones and the absence of rhizomes or stolons, similar to the caespitose growth form in graminoids (Briske and Derner, 1998). Thus, for these two species both the number of genets (clones) per plot and ramets per genet were also assessed. Artemisia ludoviciana is a rhizomatous clonal perennial with widely dispersed ramets making the identity of individual genets impossible without excavation. Thirty-six individual ramets of each species were randomly selected within each plot and tagged. A. ludoviciana plants were not present in sufficient numbers on the plots (n 5 3) in the infrequently burned site and, thus, were only assessed on the annually burned site. Growth rates of the 36 individual ramets of each species were monitored using a nondestructive modification of standard techniques for determining relative growth rates (RGR) based on incremental increases in shoot volume rather than dry mass (Hunt, 1978). Regression of shoot dry masses against shoot volume, derived from a separate set of randomly selected ramets, were used to assess the accuracy of shoot volume as a predictor of ramet aboveground biomass and RGR. Thirty-six randomly selected ramets were harvested from populations adjacent to each of the study plots in June 1996. Stem basal diameter, height, and biomass were measured for each ramet. Shoot volume was calculated as shoot volume 5 plant height 3 [p(D/2)2] where D 5 stem basal diameter. Using simple linear regression analyses, total stem volume was found to best predict total aboveground biomass for A. ludoviciana (r2 5 0.93, P , 0.001) and S. azurea (r2 5 0.93, P , 0.001), whereas stem basal diameter alone described the majority of the variation in aboveground biomass for A. sericeus (r2 5 0.94, P , 0.001). Therefore, growth of each plant species was monitored by either measuring height and basal diameter (volume) or basal diameter alone, as a good estimator of aboveground ramet biomass. Measurements were taken every 2 wk throughout the growing season (1 June–18 September). Relative growth rates for A. ludoviciana and S. azurea ramets were calculated from emergence to peak ramet size as (logV2 2 logV1)/(t2 2 t1) where V1 5 volume of a ramet at emergence, t1 (week 1), and V2 5 volume of the ramet at peak growth, t2 (A. ludoviciana 5 13 wk, S. azurea 5 15 wk). Relative growth rates for A. sericeus ramets was calculated as: (logD2 2 logD1)/(t2 2 t1) where D1 5 shoot basal diameter at emergence, t1 (week 1), and D2 5 shoot basal diameter at t2, (13 wk). After 19 wk growth (19 September) at plant senescence, numbers of flowers and buds were counted for each of the 36 ramets, and aboveground biomass was harvested, dried (72 h at 708C), and weighed. In addition, roots of ten randomly selected ramets of each species were collected from control and mycorrhizal suppression plots to evaluate the effectiveness of benomyl applications. Roots were washed free of soil, stained 1454 AMERICAN JOURNAL TABLE 1. Tallgrass prairie forb ramets (stems) per plot, genets per plot, and ramets per genet from control (mycorrhizal) and fungicidetreated (mycorrhizal-suppressed) plots (4 m2). N 5 36. Genets per plot Stems per plota Species Artemisia ludoviciana Aster sericeus Salvia azurea Control Fungicide 29.1* 56.5 9.75* 18.35 32.25* 65.65 Control Fungicide NAb 2.45 4.25 NA 3.15 5.85 OF BOTANY TABLE 2. Ramet growth rate of forbs calculated from time of emergence to peak ramet size and aboveground ramet biomass of forbs collected from control (mycorrhizal) or fungicide-treated (mycorrhizal-suppressed) plots. Ramets per geneta Control Growth rate (mm3·mm23·wk21)a Fungicide NA NA 3.9* 7.3 8.5* 13.1 Asterisks indicate mean of control significantly (P # 0.01) different from fungicide-treated counterpart as determined by least significant difference (LSD) test. b NA 5 these measurements were not applicable for this species. a with trypan blue (Phillips and Hayman, 1970), and examined microscopically to assess percentage root colonization by mycorrhizal fungi using a petri dish scored in 1-cm squares (Daniels, McCool, and Menge, 1981). Effects of mycorrhizal suppression on mycorrhizal root colonization, ramet and genet densities, flowering, aboveground biomass, and ramet relative growth rates were analyzed separately for each plant species and site using one-way ANOVA (SAS v6.12; SAS, 1997). When appropriate, differences between control and fungicide treatments were tested using least significant difference (LSD) tests. Effects of fungicide application on ramet growth, as estimated by stem volume or stem diameter, were analyzed for each site and species separately using repeated-measures ANOVA (PROC MIXED; SAS, 1997) using an autoregressive covariance structure. Differences in ramet growth estimates with mycorrhizal suppression were also tested for each sampling date, plant, and site separately using one-way ANOVA. Differences between control and fungicide treatments were tested using LSD tests. RESULTS The benomyl treatments were successful in significantly reducing mycorrhizal colonization in the roots of these three forbs species in both infrequently and annually burned sites (P # 0.05). Benomyl reduced mycorrhizal root colonization to an average of 4.2% in the mycorrhizal suppression plots, ;33% of the untreated control plots (13.7%). Mycorrhizal suppression did not affect percentage ramet survival from emergence to 19 wk (plant senescence) as there were no significant differences between control and fungicidetreated plants. Ramet survivorship was also similar among species examined in this study. Artemisia ludoviciana, A. sericeus, and S. azurea showed ramet survivorship rates of 74, 79, and 81%, respectively, with overall survivorship of 79%. Suppression of mycorrhizal fungi resulted in large and significant (P # 0.01) increases in the total ramet (stem) densities of A. ludoviciana, A. sericeus, and S. azurea (Table 1). After six growing seasons of mycorrhizal suppression, ramet densities in fungicide-treated plots were approximately double those of mycorrhizal plots. While the fungicide had no significant effect on the number of A. sericeus or S. azurea genets within each plot, number of ramets per genet significantly increased with mycorrhizal suppression (P # 0.05), as compared to mycorrhizal controls (Table 1). Ramet growth rates and biomass of the three forb species varied in response to suppression of the symbiosis (Table 2). Although S. azurea ramet densities increased in response to fungicide application, the relative growth rate of ramets (based on stem volume) from emergence to peak ramet size, as well as final aboveground biomass (at 19 wk) of individual ramets was significantly lower with fungicide treatment (P # 0.05) as compared to control plants on the annually burned watershed (Table 2). Also with [Vol. 88 Species Artemisia ludovicianab Aster sericeus Infrequently burned Annually burned Salvia azurea Infrequently burned Annually burned Aboveground ramet biomass (g dry mass)a Fungicidetreated Control Fungicidetreated 0.383* 0.450 1.05* 1.98 0.076 0.057 0.071 0.061 1.90 0.89 1.27 0.79 0.340 0.392* 0.343 0.327 0.74 1.81* 0.64 0.64 Control a Means followed by asterisks indicate fungicide-treated is statistically different (P , 0.05) from control as determined by least significant difference (LSD) test. b Artemisia ludoviciana was not present in sufficient numbers (n 5 3) on the study plots of the infrequently burned site. annual burning, individual stem diameters of mycorrhizal plants were significantly (P # 0.05) larger throughout the growing season, as compared to stems of mycorrhizal-suppressed plants (Fig. 1). However, in the infrequently burned sites, mycorrhizal suppression had no significant effect on ramet growth rate or size. By contrast, A. ludoviciana exhibited increases in ramet relative growth rates, final ramet biomass, and ramet density in response to fungicide application (Table 2). Aboveground ramet biomass of this forb, as estimated by stem volume, was greater in fungicide-treated plots each week throughout growing season (Fig. 2). Although the ramet densities of A. sericeus were increased in response to mycorrhizal suppression (Table 1), ramet relative growth rate and mean final ramet biomass remained unaffected (Table 2). At only one intermediate sampling date was the estimated ramet biomass significantly different between the two mycorrhizal treatments (Fig. 3). Mycorrhizal suppression reduced flowering (number of flowers and buds) of both A. sericeus and S. azurea on the infrequently burned watershed, but not the annually burned site. Few ramets flowered in the annually burned watershed, and there was no significant difference (P . 0.01) between mycorrhizal treatments (Table 3). Inflorescences were not present on A. ludoviciana. DISCUSSION Suppression of mycorrhizal fungi in tallgrass prairie resulted in marked changes in plant growth, reproduction, and demography of the three forb species. Six years of fungicide treatment resulted in an approximate doubling of ramet densities in all three species, indicating that active mycorrhizae reduce ramet densities in these forbs over the long term. This reduction in ramet densities was the result of a reduction in the number of ramets produced per clone, as there were no effects of mycorrhizae on ramet survivorship throughout the growing season or on genet densities. Thus, decreases in the abundances of these subdominant forb populations under mycorrhizal conditions in tallgrass prairie can be attributed to reductions in ramet production and genet size, rather than to any reductions in flower production, new genet establishment, or genet survivorship. Previous studies (Hetrick, Wilson, and Todd, 1992; Wilson August 2001] WILSON ET AL.—MYCORRHIZAL EFFECTS ON PRAIRIE FORBS 1455 Fig. 2. Effect of fungicide application on growth dynamics of Artemisia ludoviciana ramets (expressed as change in aboveground ramet size) from emergence to 19 wk (senescence) in annually burned watershed. Solid line indicates control (mycorrhizal), dashed line indicates fungicide-treated (mycorrhizal-suppressed). Asterisks indicate fungicide-treated plants significantly different from control plants (P # 0.05). Fig. 1. Effect of fungicide application on growth dynamics of Salvia azurea ramets (expressed as change in aboveground ramet size) from emergence to 19 wk (senescence) in infrequently burned (a) and annually burned (b) watersheds. Solid line indicates control (mycorrhizal), dashed line indicates fungicide-treated (mycorrhizal-suppressed). Asterisks indicate fungicide-treated plants significantly different from control plants (P # 0.05). and Hartnett, 1998) have shown that the species studied here vary in their vegetative growth responses to mycorrhizal symbiosis under greenhouse conditions. Mycorrhizal dependency (or responsiveness, calculated as the proportional difference in biomass between mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal plants [Hetrick, Wilson, and Todd, 1990]), of A. ludoviciana, A. sericeus, and S. azurea is 44, 76, and 87%, respectively. In the present study, these species also differed considerably in their growth and reproductive responses to mycorrhizal conditions in the field, but in ways that were not predictable from their responses when grown individually in the greenhouse. The responses of Salvia azurea to mycorrhizal conditions included lower ramet densities, but greater relative growth rates, ramet size, and flower production compared to mycorrhizal suppressed conditions. This suggests a significant influence of mycorrhizal symbiosis on genet growth dynamics in this species. The observed pattern of fewer but larger ramets per genet under mycorrhizal conditions in S. azurea indicates greater intraclonal self-thinning, perhaps stimulated by increased resource availability associated with the mycorrhizal symbiosis. In A. sericeus populations, mycorrhizal colonization similarly resulted in decreased ramet densities and increased flower production, but it had no effect on ramet growth rates or size. In A. ludoviciana populations under natural field conditions, mycorrhizae reduced ramet growth rates, size, and densities. This contrasts with responses of this species to mycorrhizae when grown as individual plants in the greenhouse, where it responds as a facultative mycotroph and shows some increased growth in the presence of AM fungi. This negative effect of mycorrhizae on plant performance in the field is most likely due to the fact that any potential direct beneficial effects of the symbiosis on A. ludoviciana are offset by greater competitive suppression by its interspecific neighbors, which are obligately mycotrophic and become much more strongly competitive under mycorrhizal conditions. Earlier studies of multispecies prairie microcosms conducted under greenhouse conditions (Wilson and Hartnett, 1997), previous field studies Hartnett and Wilson, 1999; Smith, Hartnett, and Wilson, 1999; and this field study indicate that mycorrhizal symbiosis greatly increases the relative competitive ability of the dominant, warm-season grasses and that subordinate facultative mycotrophs competing with these highly mycorrhizal-dependent species experience competitive release when mycorrhizae are suppressed. In this study, all three forb species showed increased ramet densities with suppression of the symbiosis, presumably in response to a concomitant decline in abundance of the highly mycorrhizal-dependent dominant C4 grasses. The contrasting responses of these forb species grown individually in greenhouse studies with those observed here in natural communities supports the recent work of Facelli et al. (1999) who emphasized that the effects of AM symbiosis at the individual plant level cannot be assumed to reflect effects at the population level, because of the influence of density-dependent processes. These results also support conclusions of a previous field experiment involving germination and emergence of tallgrass prairie species established from seed (Hartnett et al., 1994) that responses to mycorrhizal symbiosis vary among different life history stages within species. 1456 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY [Vol. 88 TABLE 3. Flower production (number of flowers 1 buds) of forb ramets collected from control (mycorrhizal) or fungicide-treated (mycorrhizal-suppressed) plots (n 5 36). Species Aster sericeus Infrequently burned Annually burned Salvia azurea Infrequently burned Annually burned Controla Fungicide-treated 16.54* 0.83 2.80 0.52 5.11* 1.55 1.17 1.14 a Means followed by asterisks indicate fungicide-treated is statistically different (P , 0.05) from control as determined by least significant difference (LSD) test. Fig. 3. Effect of fungicide application on growth dynamics of Aster sericeus ramets (expressed as change in basal diameter) from emergence to 19 wk (senescence) in infrequently burned (a) and annually burned (b) watersheds. Solid line indicates control (mycorrhizal), dashed line indicates fungicide-treated (mycorrhizal-suppressed). Asterisks indicate fungicide-treated plants significantly different from control plants (P # 0.05). The patterns of responses of these species to mycorrhizae differed considerably between the two sites of contrasting fire regime. For example, in S. azurea the increase in ramet size under mycorrhizal conditions was only apparent in the annually burned site. This may be in response to a nutrient flush associate with burning (Knapp and Seastedt, 1986). Nutrient pulses, such as those associated with burning, are likely to be especially important with resources of low mobility, such as phosphorus. Mycorrhizae have been shown to increase intraspecific competition through an increase in phosphorus availability and may have an important role in altering the dynamics of soil resources (Watkinson and Freckleton, 1997; Facelli et al., 1999). Mycorrhizal fungi provide enhanced nutrient acquisition, notably phosphorus, thereby giving colonized plants a competitive advantage, as they are able to capitalize on elevated nutrient levels following burning. In the absence of this nutrient flush, ramets of both the mycorrhizal and fungicide- treated plots in infrequently burned prairie were smaller than those in the annually burned mycorrhizal controls. Mycorrhizae had a positive effect on flowering of both A. sericeus and S. azurea in infrequently burned prairie, but mycorrhizae had no effect on flowering in the annually burned watershed. Mycorrhizal plants have been shown to increase in seed number, seed mass, and P and N content as compared to nonmycorrhizal counterparts (Lu and Koide, 1994). Enhanced efficiency of nutrient acquisition by mycorrhizal plants may allow more resources to be allocated to reproduction in the infrequently burned site. By contrast, with annual burning, the high dominance of the warm-season grasses may be limiting other resources not affected by mycorrhizae, and therefore, few flowers were produced regardless of mycorrhizal treatment. While this effect may be partially a result of other site differences not associated with burning, the trend of increased flowering in response to infrequent burning is consistent with earlier studies of fire effects in tallgrass prairie (e.g., Knapp, 1984; Hartnett, 1990, 1991). In general, these patterns of plant responses to mycorrhizae in tallgrass prairie sites of contrasting burn regimes indicate that the interaction of this large-scale disturbance (fire) and mycorrhizal symbiosis modulates the intensity and patterns of interspecific competition between and among tallgrass prairie grass and forb species. Based on this and previous studies, it is apparent that arbuscular mycorrhizae can influence the coexistence and relative abundances of plant species both directly and indirectly. Direct effects include the modification of plant traits (e.g., seed reproduction, genet establishment, ramet growth, and survivorship) by AM fungi and, possibly, by transfer of resources via interplant hyphal connections (Fischer-Walter et al., 1996). Indirect mechanisms include the possible impact of AM fungi on neighborhood interactions. Francis and Read (1995) observed that while mycorrhizal fungi may indeed have a favorable impact on some species within a community, they are at the same time discriminating against others. The conflicting results of previous experiments assessing effects of AM symbiosis on plant communities (Allen and Allen, 1990; Eissenstat and Newman, 1990; Allsop and Stock, 1992; Moora and Zobel, 1996; Hartnett and Wilson, 1999; Smith, Hartnett, and Wilson, 1999) are likely explained by differences in interspecific patterns of mycorrhizal dependencies and resultant differences in the balance between direct positive effects of mycorrhizae on host plant growth and indirect negative effects mediated through altered competitive interactions. Furthermore, our results suggest that in grasslands, this balance and, hence, the role of mycorrhizal symbiosis, are also influenced August 2001] WILSON ET AL.—MYCORRHIZAL EFFECTS ON PRAIRIE FORBS by changes in plant resources driven by large-scale processes such as fire. LITERATURE CITED ALLEN, E. B., AND M. F. ALLEN. 1990. The mediation of competition by mycorrhizae in successional and patchy environments. In J. R. Grace and D. Tilman [eds.], Perspectives on plant competition, 367–389. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA. ALLSOPP, N., AND W. D. STOCK. 1992. Density dependent interactions between VA mycorrhizal fungi and even-aged seedlings of two perennial Fabaceae species. Oecologia 91: 281–287. BRISKE, D. D., AND J. D. DERNER. 1998. Clonal biology of caespitose grasses. In G. P. Cheplick [ed.], Population biology of grasses, 106–135. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. DANIELS, B. A., P. M. MCCOOL, AND J. A. MENGE. 1981. Comparative inoculum potential of spores of six vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 89: 385–391. ———, AND H. A. SKIPPER. 1982. Methods for the recovery and quantitative estimation of propagules from soil. In N. C. Schenck [ed.], Methods and principles on mycorrhizal research, 29–35. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. EISSENSTAT, D. M., AND E. I. NEWMAN. 1990. Seedling establishment near large plants: effects of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas on the intensity of plant competition. Functional Ecology 4: 95–99. FACELLI, E., J. M. FACELLI, S. E. SMITH, AND M. J. MCLAUGHLIN. 1999. Interactive effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, intraspecific competition and resource availability on Trifolium subterraneum cv. Mt. Barker. New Phytologist 141: 535–547. FISCHER-WALTER, L. E., D. C. HARTNETT, B. A. D. HETRICK, AND A. P. SCHWAB. 1996. Interspecific nutrient transfer in a tallgrass prairie plant community. American Journal of Botany 83: 180–184. FITTER, A. H., AND R. NICHOLS. 1988. The use of benomyl to control infection by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 110: 201–206. FRANCIS, R., AND D. J. READ. 1995. Mutualism and antagonism in the mycorrhizal symbiosis, with special reference to impacts on plant community structure. Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 1301–1309. FREEMAN, C. C. 1998. The flora of Konza Prairie: a historical review and complementary patterns. In A. K. Knapp, J. M. Briggs, D. C. Hartnett, and S. L. Collins [eds.], Grassland dynamics: long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie, 81–100. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA. GANGE, A. C., V. K. BROWN, AND L. M. FARMER. 1990. A test of mycorrhizal fungi benefit in an early successional plant community. New Phytologist 115: 85–91. ———, V. K. BROWN, AND G. S. SINCLAIR. 1993. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a determinant of plant community structure in early succession. Functional Ecology 7: 616–622. GREAT PLAINS FLORA ASSOCIATION. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas, USA. GRIME, J. P., J. M. MACKEY, S. H. HILLIER, AND D. J. READ. 1987. Floristic diversity in a model system using experimental microcosms. Nature 328: 420–422. GUREVICH, J., L. L. MORROW, A. WALLACE, AND J. S. WALSH. 1992. A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. American Naturalist 140: 539–572. HARLEY, J. L., AND E. L. HARLEY. 1987. A checklist of mycorrhiza in the British flora. New Phytologist Supplement 105: 1–102. HARTNETT, D. C. 1990. Size-dependent allocation to sexual and vegetative reproduction in four clonal composites. Oecologia 84: 254–259. ———. 1991. Effects of fire in tallgrass prairie on growth and reproduction of prairie coneflower (Ratibida columnifera: Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 429–435. ———, B. A. D. HETRICK, G. W. T. WILSON, AND D. J. GIBSON. 1993. Mycorrhizal influence on intra- and interspecific neighbor interactions among co-occurring prairie grasses. Journal of Ecology 81: 787–795. ———, R. J. SAMANUS, L. E. FISCHER, AND B. A. D. HETRICK. 1994. Plant 1457 demographic responses to mycorrhizal symbiosis in tallgrass prairie. Oecologia 99: 21–26. ———, AND G. W. T. WILSON. 1999. Mycorrhizal influence plant community structure and diversity in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 80: 1187–1195. HETRICK, B. A. D., G. W. T. WILSON, AND T. C. TODD. 1990. Differential responses of C3 and C4 grasses to mycorrhizal symbiosis, phosphorus fertilization, and soil microorganisms. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 461–467. ———, ———, AND ———. 1992. Relationships of mycorrhizal symbiosis, rooting strategy, and phenology among tallgrass prairie forbs. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 1521–1528. HUNT, R. 1978. Plant growth and analysis. Studies in biology. Number 96. Edward Arnold Publishing, London, UK. HUNTLY, N. 1991. Herbivores and the dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 22: 477–503. KNAPP, A. K. 1984. Effect of fire in tallgrass prairie on seed production of Vernonia baldwinii Torr.(Compositae). Southwest Naturalist 29: 242– 243. ———, AND T. R. SEASTEDT. 1986. Detritus accumulation limits productivity of tallgrass prairie. BioScience 36: 662–668. LU, X., AND R. T. KOIDE. 1994. The effects of mycorrhizal infection on components of plant growth and reproduction. New Phytologist 128: 211–218. MARSCHNER, H., AND B. DELL. 1994. Nutrient uptake in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant and Soil 159: 89–102. MOORA, M., AND M. ZOBEL. 1996. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza on interand intraspecific competition of two grassland species. Oecologia 108: 79–84. PAUL, N. D., P. G. ARYES, AND L. E. WYNESS. 1989. On the use of fungicides for experimentation in natural vegetation. Functional Ecology 3: 759– 769. PHILLIPS, J. M., AND D. S. HAYMAN. 1970. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 55: 158–161. SANDERS, I. R., R. T. KOIDE, AND D. L. SHUMWAY. 1995. Community-level interactions between plants and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. In A. K. Varma and B. Hock [eds.], Mycorrhiza, 607–625. Springer, Berlin, Germany. SAS. 1997. SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements through release 6. 12. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA. SCHENCK, N. C., AND Y. PEREZ. 1990. Manual for the identification of VA mycorrhizal fungi, 3rd ed. Synergistic Publications, University of Florida, Gainsville, Florida, USA. SMITH, M. D., D. C. HARTNETT, AND C. W. RICE. 2000. Effects of long-term fungicide application on microbial processes in tallgrass prairie soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 935–946. ———, ———, AND G. W. T. WILSON. 1999. Interacting influence of mycorrhizal symbiosis and competition on plant diversity in tallgrass prairie. Oecologia 121: 574–582. SMITH, S. E., AND D. J. READ. 1997. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, London, UK. WATKINSON, A., AND R. FRECKLETON. 1997. Quantifying the impact of arbuscular mycorrhiza on plant competition. Journal of Ecology 85: 541– 545. WEST, H. M., A. H. FITTER, AND A. R. WATKINSON. 1993. Response of Vulpia ciliata ssp. Ambigua to removal of mycorrhizal infection and to phosphate application under natural conditions. Journal of Ecology 81: 351–358. WHITTAKER, R. H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21: 213–251. WILSON, G. W. T., AND D. C. HARTNETT. 1997. Effects of mycorrhizae on plant growth and dynamics in experimental tallgrass prairie microcosms. American Journal of Botany 84: 478–482. ———, AND ———. 1998. Interspecific variation in plant responses to mycorrhizal colonization in tallgrass prairie. American Journal of Botany 85: 1732–1738. ZOBEL, M., AND M. MOORA. 1997. Plant coexistance in the interactive environment: arbuscular mycorrhiza should not be out of mind. Oikos 78: 202–207.

Useful suggestions for preparing your ‘How To Fill Quotation Form’ online

Are you weary of the burden of managing paperwork? Search no further than airSlate SignNow, the leading digital signature platform for individuals and small to medium-sized businesses. Bid farewell to the monotonous tasks of printing and scanning documents. With airSlate SignNow, you can easily complete and sign documents online. Utilize the extensive features embedded in this user-friendly and cost-effective platform and transform your document management strategy. Whether you need to sign forms or gather signatures, airSlate SignNow manages everything seamlessly, needing just a few clicks.

Follow this detailed guide:

  1. Sign in to your account or register for a complimentary trial with our service.
  2. Click +Create to upload a file from your device, cloud storage, or our form library.
  3. Open your ‘How To Fill Quotation Form’ in the editor.
  4. Click Me (Fill Out Now) to finalize the form on your end.
  5. Add and designate fillable fields for other participants (if necessary).
  6. Proceed with the Send Invite options to solicit eSignatures from others.
  7. Download, print your copy, or convert it into a reusable template.

Don’t be concerned if you need to collaborate with your teammates on your How To Fill Quotation Form or send it for notarization—our platform provides you with everything necessary to accomplish such tasks. Create an account with airSlate SignNow today and advance your document management to a higher level!

Here is a list of the most common customer questions. If you can’t find an answer to your question, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us.

Need help? Contact Support
Sign up and try How to fill quotation form
  • Close deals faster
  • Improve productivity
  • Delight customers
  • Increase revenue
  • Save time & money
  • Reduce payment cycles