-1-
I.
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
The Court should enter a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction prohibiting
__________ from advertising, proceeding with or taking any other action with regard to
__________ attempt to foreclose on certain Deeds of Trust executed by __________ (the
"__________") on lands located in __________Counties, __________. Injunctive relief is
necessary to maintain the status quo until the issue of whether the promissory notes which the
deeds of trust secure are due and payable or whether Whitney has agreed to forbear collect ion of
the notes. The issue of whether the notes are due and payable or whether __________ has agreed to forbear
collection of the notes is currently the subject of two legal proceedings between __________ and
the __________ one on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from
the United States District Court for the __________ District of __________ and the other
presently before the United States District Court for the __________ District of __________.
However, neither court has ruled whether or not __________ is entitled to demand the
immediate payment of the amount claimed to be due from the __________ and these forecl osure
proceedings are an attempt by __________ to obtain prejudgment seizure and attachment of the
__________ property and to otherwise unfairly gain an advantage over the __________ prior to
a determination of the parties' respective rights in the two federal court cases. __________ courts have long held that land is peculiar in nature and __________ foreclosures of
the __________property in __________ Counties, __________, will result in immediate and
substantial irreparable harm, damages and losses to the __________. The __________ do not
have an adequate remedy at law. Moreover, __________ attempt to foreclose on the
__________' property prior to a determination of liability constitutes an attempt to obtain a
prejudgment seizure and attachment in violation of the due process provisions of the
__________ Constitution. Courts have also long recognized that the violation of a person's
constitutional right constitutes irreparable harm for which there is no adequate remedy at law. The __________ should be required to post only a minimal security bond upon the issuance of
injunction relief. Rule _____ of the __________ Rules of Civil Procedure provides that while
security must be given upon the issuance of a temporary restraining order or preliminary
injunction, the amount of such security is at the discretion of the court. In a case suc h as this,
-2-
where the creditor is over secured and where the collateral is real property which is appreciating,
rather than depreciating, in value, only a minimal security bond is necessary because as a
practical matter the damages which may be incurred or suffered by __________ should it be
found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained would be insignificant.
I.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
For over ___ years, the __________ have been in the business of acquiring, developing,
investing in, and selling properties and other assets, which include mineral interests, oil and gas
leases, oil and gas wells, real estate and timberland. The nature of this busine ss is speculative
and requires long-term loans, long-term financing, and long-term forbearance from a lending
institution, which is willing to loan money long-term on and for speculative properties a nd to
await the development or sale of the properties to be paid. The __________ began doing business with __________ in ______. The __________ relied on
__________'s assurances that __________ would provide the __________ with long-term loans,
financing, and, most importantly, the necessary forbearance which the __________ would need
over a long period of time in order to acquire, develop, and sell properties at the most optimum
prices available. Since _______, the __________ have been one of the substantial customers of
__________. __________ has provided the __________ with long-term loans, financing, and
the necessary forbearance for the __________' acquisition, development, investment, and sale of
various properties. Pursuant to written and verbal agreements, including modifications and
amendments of notes, and the long-standing course of dealing between the parties, __________,
e.g. , has loaned money to the __________, has advanced monies to the __________ in
anticipation of sale, has encouraged the __________ to acquire properties, has paid debts owed
by the __________ and has rolled the payments into the __________' account, and has paid
down the __________' account with proceeds received from time to time from the __________'
income producing properties and the __________' periodic sales of properties. __________ has
repeatedly waived the strict enforcement of the default provisions of the written agreem ents
between them and the __________ have relied to their detriment on these agreements. For
example, the __________ are presently involved in a sale of approximately 7500 acres of
timberland in __________ on which __________ holds a second mortgage. The __________
have at all times kept __________ fully apprised of the __________' efforts to sell the
-3-
timberland and of the proposed sale, with the agreement and understanding that the __________
will use a portion of the sale proceeds to bring current the accrued interest on the __________
debt to the Bank. This course of dealing between the __________ and the __________ has been
followed since _______.The relationship between the __________ and __________ has been a long-standing fiduciary
relationship of mutual trust and confidence for the mutual benefit and profit of both the
__________ and __________. __________ has exercised a degree of control and influence over
the __________' business activities. The __________ and __________ have both benefited from
the relationship. Since ________, the __________ have paid __________ over $00.00 in interest
and $00.00 in principal in connection with loans made by __________ to the __________. The __________ have secured __________ with various mortgages, deeds of trust, and security
interests in properties located in __________, __________, and __________ Counties,
__________. These properties include mineral interests, real estate, oil and gas leases, oi l and
gas wells, and timberlands. The value of these properties more than secures the __________'
debt to __________. Although the __________ are not in default, __________, in breach of its agreements with the
__________ and its fiduciary duties and its duties of good faith and fair dealing, has demande d
that the __________ immediately pay the Bank $00.00 in claimed principal and intere st. On
__________, _________ , the __________ filed suit in the United States District Court for the
__________ District of __________ against __________ for various claims including, breach of
contract and a declaratory judgment that the __________ indebtedness to __________ is not due
(the "__________ case"). A copy of the complaint filed by the __________ in the __________
case is attached to the Verified Complaint filed herein as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by
reference. Subsequently, __________ sued the __________ in the United States District Court
for the __________ District of __________ for recovery of the amount claimed to be due (the
"__________ case"). A copy of the complaint filed by __________ in the __________ case is
attached to the Verified Complaint filed herein as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by reference.
The __________ case is presently on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit. The __________ case is still active in the __________ district court. Neither the c ourt
in the __________ case nor the court in the __________ case has ruled as to whether or not
__________ is entitled to demand the immediate payment of the amount claimed to be due.
-4-
__________'s demand for immediate payment is a breach of the agreements between the
__________ and __________ for __________ to provide the __________ with long-term loans,
financing, and the necessary forbearance while the __________, e.g., develop and sell various
properties, so as to apply the proceeds received to reduce the __________' debt to __________.
__________ is estopped to deny, dispute, renege on or breach its agreements with the
__________ and from demanding or receiving the immediate payment of the __________'
outstanding account, an account which is fully secured by various deeds of trust, mortgages and
security interests and has waived strict enforcement of the default provisions of the wri tten
agreements between them. As a portion of the security for their indebtedness to the __________, the __________ on
__________, _______ executed a certain Land Deed of Trust to __________, Trustee, for the
benefit of __________ , which is recorded in Book __________, Pages __________, Record of
Mortgages and Deeds of Trust on Land, __________ County, __________, First Judicial District
and in Book __________, Pages __________, Record of Mortgages and Deeds of Trust on Land,
__________ County, __________. By instrument dated __________, ________, __________,
as owner and holder of the said Land Deed of Trust substituted __________, as Substituted
Trustee, in place of and in lieu of __________, which instrument is recorded in Substituted
Trustee Book __________, Pages __________, on file in the office of the Chancery Clerk of
__________ County, __________, First Judicial District, and in Substituted Trustee Book
__________, Pages __________, on file in the office of the Chancery Clerk of __________
County, __________. On __________, _______, __________ commenced foreclosure of said Land Deed of Trust by
posting a "Substituted Trustee's Notice of Sale" on the main bulletin board at the __________
County Courthouse in __________, __________, and by commencing publication of said
"Substituted Trustee's Notice of Sale" in __________. The "Substituted Trustee's Notice of
Sale" was published by said newspapers on __________, ________. A copy of the "Substituted
Trustee's Notice of Sale" is attached to the Verified Complaint filed herein as Exhibit "A" and
incorporated by reference.
I.
ARGUMENT
-5-
The __________ Are Entitled to Injunctive Relief to
Prevent Irreparable Harm and Maintain the Status Quo
Pending a Decision on the Issue of Whether the __________'
Indebtedness to __________ Is Immediately Due and Payable
The __________ are entitled to entry of a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary
Injunction against __________, __________, enjoining and prohibiting said Defendants from
advertising and taking any other actions in an attempt to foreclose on the Deed of Trust executed
by the __________ on lands located in __________ Counties, __________ as security for their
indebtedness to __________. Such injunctive relief is necessary to maintain the status quo
pending resolution of the question of whether the promissory notes which the deeds of trust
secure are due and payable. As the court noted in Rochelle v. State, 75 So.2d 268 (Miss. 1954):
The true object and purpose of an interlocutory injunction is to
hold and preserve in status quo the subject matter upon which the
decree is to operate until the court is able to finally adjudicate the
rights and duties of the parties. Griffith Miss. Chancery Practice
(2d ed. 1950), Secs. 442, 443.
Rochelle , 75 So.2 at 270. When granting a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction,
the status quo which courts try to preserve has been almost uniformly defined as the "last
uncontested status which preceded the pending controversy." Miss. Power & Light v. United
Gas Pipeline , 609 F. Supp. 333 (D.C. Miss. 1985). In the present case, the status quo can only
be maintained by a preliminary injunction which prohibits any further efforts by the Defendants
to foreclose on the __________' properties in __________ Counties, __________. The issuance of temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions are governed by Rule
___ of the __________ Rules of Civil Procedure. Under Rule ____, the circumstances in which
a preliminary injunction may be granted are not described, but are a matter of the trial court's
discretion, to be exercised in conformity with traditional equity practices. See Moore v. Sanders,
558 So.2d 1383, 1385 (Miss. 1990). In the present case, equity requires that the Defendants be
prohibited from proceeding with foreclosure. Under __________ jurisprudence, irreparable injury is the only finding a court must make before
it may issue a TRO or preliminary injunction. If the status quo is not maintained, the
__________ will undoubtedly suffer irreparable harm for which they have no adequate remedy
at law. However, in order for a remedy at law to be deemed adequate, the remedy must be as
effectual and speedy as the remedy and equity. Rockett v. Finley, 184 So. 78, 80 (Miss. 1938).
As the court stated in Moss v. Jourdan, 92 So. 689 (Miss. 1922):
-6-
The term "irreparable" has acquired in the law of injunctions a
meaning, which, perhaps, is not quite in keeping with the
derivation of the word or its literal signification. There are injuries
incapable of being repaired, which a court of equity does not
regard, as irreparable. And, on the other hand, there are injuries
that may be repaired which it will, nevertheless, treat as
irreparable, if the person inflicting or threatening them be insolvent
or unable to respond in damages. As ordinarily used, the term
means that which cannot be repaired, restored or adequately
compensated for in money, or whether compensation cannot be
safely measured.
Moss , 92 So. at 690, quoting R.C.L. pp. 346-47. Hence, the essential features of an "irreparable"
injury are: (1) That the injury is an act, which is a serious change of, or is destructive to,
the property it affects either physically or in the character in which it has been
held and enjoyed. (2) That the property must have some peculiar quality or use
such that its pecuniary value, as estimated by a jury, will not fairly recom-
pensate the owner for its loss.
Hood v. Foster , 13 So.2d 652, 654 (Miss. 1943).
However, where the subject matter of the injunctive relief is real property, the c ourts have
recognized that "land is per se property of peculiar value, and will be protected by injunction
without reference to its quality, use or value." Id. It appears that courts have made land a
subject for protection by injunction for the same reasons that land is a subject for specifi c perfor-
mance without reference to its quality, use or value in cases of contracts. Moss, 92 So., at 691,
quoting, 5 Pomeroy's Equity § 495.
In addition, __________'s institution of these foreclosure proceedings on the __________'
properties in __________ Counties, __________ is an effort by __________ to obtain
prejudgment seizure and attachment of the __________ property and to otherwise unfairly gain
an advantage over the __________ prior to a determination of their rights by the Federal Courts,
in violation of the __________ right to due process under Section ___ of the __________
Constitution. If the Defendants are not prohibited from foreclosing, the __________ will suffer
substantial and irreparable damages and losses as a result of a violation of their sta te
constitutional rights. The __________ courts have long recognized that a preliminary injunction or temporary
restraining order is appropriate in situations similar to the case at hand. For exam ple, in Barcroft
v. Armstrong , 21 So.2d 817 (Miss. 1945), Armstrong brought an action to enjoin foreclosure of
his deed of trust in favor of the Allied Trust Company, Ltd. The defendants were P. B. Barcroft,
individually and as trustee in the deed of trust, C. F. Williams, an agent of the defendant,
-7-
Alliance Trust Company, Ltd., who was beneficiary, and two newspapers, The Natchez
Democrat Printing and Publishing Company, Inc. and The Woodville Republican. Armstrong
raised a number of claims in its suit, including the allegation that the balanc e due was less than
that claimed by the mortgagee or beneficiary; that the balance was to be com puted in the light of
an alleged agreement with the mortgagee to reduce the interest rate to six percent (6%); that the
attempted foreclosure was premature; that the foreclosure was for an excessive amount; and
contemplated foreclosure of lands not properly a part of the security. Id., at 818. Upon the filing
of the suit, the court immediately issued a preliminary injunction restraining any a dvertisement
or other proceeding toward foreclosure until a final hearing could be held by the Chancell or to
fix the rights between the parties. Id.
Like the plaintiff in Barcroft, the __________ are entitled to injunctive relief to prevent and
enjoin the Defendants from advertising or taking any other proceedings regarding foreclosure of
the __________ property in __________ Counties, __________. Until adjudication in one of the
federal court cases that the __________ indebtedness to __________ is immediately due and
payable, __________ is not entitled to foreclose. Allowing the Defendants to proceed with
foreclosure will undeniably result in irreparable harm to the __________. Equity requires that a
TRO and preliminary injunction be issued. I.
ONLY A MINIMAL SECURITY BOND SHOULD BE REQUIRED FROM THE __________
Upon the issuance of a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction in this matte r, the
__________ should only be required to provide a minimal security bond. While Rule ____
under the __________ Rules of Civil Procedure provides that security must be given upon the
issuance of a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, the amount of such security
is at the discretion of the Court. International A.B.S. & O.I. v. H. L. Byrd Building Service, Inc. ,
284 So.2d 301, 304 (Miss. 1973). A Chancellor's decision regarding the amount of security
required will not be disturbed on appeal except upon an abuse of discretion. Broom v.
Hattiesburg Building & Trades Council , 206 So.2d 184 (Miss. 1967).
In the present case, the collateral which the __________ have pledged to __________ as security
in its indebtedness, exceeds the amount of their debt to __________ and __________ is therefore
over secured. Moreover, the security is real property, which continues to appreciate, rather t han
depreciate in value. In such a situation, it is clear that a minimal sec urity bond should be
-8-
required. Any damages which __________ might incur or suffer as a result of a preliminary
injunction or temporary restraining order, should it be determined that such injunctive relieve
was wrongfully issued, would be insignificant. In this situation, the __________ should only be
required to post a minimal security bond.
I.
CONCLUSION
The Court should enter a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction prohibiting
__________ from advertising, proceeding with or taking any other action with regard to
__________ and __________ attempt to foreclose on certain Deeds of Trust executed by
__________ on lands located in __________ Counties, __________. Injunctive relief is
necessary to maintain the status quo until the issue of whether the promissory notes which the
deeds of trust secure are due and payable or whether __________ has agreed to forbear
collection of the notes. The issue of whether the notes are due and payable or whether __________ has agreed to forbear
collection of the notes is currently the subject of two legal proceedings between __________ and
the __________. Neither court has ruled that __________ is entitled to demand the immediate
payment of the amount claimed to be due from the __________ and these foreclosure
proceedings are an attempt by __________ to obtain prejudgment seizure and attachment of the
__________ property and to otherwise unfairly gain an advantage over the __________ prior to
a determination of the parties' respective rights in the two federal court cases. __________ courts have long held that land is peculiar in nature and __________'s foreclosures
of the __________' property in __________ Counties, __________, will result in immediate and
substantial irreparable harm, damages and losses to the __________. Moreover, __________'s
attempt to foreclose on the __________' property prior to a determination of liability constit utes
an attempt to obtain a prejudgment seizure and attachment in violation of t he due process
provisions of the __________ Constitution. The __________ do not have an adequate remedy at
law. The __________ should be required to post only a minimal security bond upon the issuance of
injunction relief. Rule ___ of the __________ Rules of Civil Procedure provides that while
security must be given upon the issuance of a temporary restraining order or preliminary
injunction, the amount of such security is at the discretion of the court. In a case suc h as this,
-9-
where the creditor is over secured and where the collateral is real property which is appreciating,
rather than depreciating, in value, only a minimal security bond is necessary because as a
practical matter the damages which may be incurred or suffered by __________ should it be
found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained would be insignificant. THIS, the _____ day of __________, ______. Respectfully submitted,__________
By:_________________
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS