Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Joint Legal Decision Making

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Parenting Plan for Joint or Sole Legal Decision-Making

Person Filing:

Address (if not protected):

City, State, Zip Code:

Telephone:

Email Address:

ATLAS Number:

Lawyer’s Bar Number:

Representing:

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA

IN COUNTY

Name of Petitioner / Party A

Case Number

PARENTING PLAN FOR:

Or



INSTRUCTIONS

This document has 4 parts: PART 1) General Information; PART 2) Legal Decision-Making (Legal Custody) and Parenting Time; PART 3) Danger to Children Notification Statement; and PART 4) Joint Legal Decision-Making (Joint Legal Custody) Agreement.

PART 1: GENERAL INFORMATION

A. MINOR CHILDREN

B. THE FOLLOWING LEGAL DECISION-MAKING (LEGAL CUSTODY) ARRANGEMENT IS REQUESTED



Primary physical custody will be with the

PART 2: PHYSICAL CUSTODY AND PARENTING TIME

A. (School Year) WEEKDAY AND WEEKEND TIME-SHARING SCHEDULE

The minor children will be in the care of Party A as follows:

The minor children will be in the care of Party B as follows:

Other physical custody arrangements are as follows:

Transportation will be provided as follows: will pick the minor children up at o'clock.

will drop the minor children off at o'clock.

Parents may change their time-share arrangements by mutual agreement with at least days' notice in advance to the other parent.

B. SUMMER MONTHS OR SCHOOL BREAK LONGER THAN 4 DAYS

Each parent is entitled to a week period of vacation time with the minor children. The parents will work out the details of the vacation at least days in advance.

C. TRAVEL

days without prior written consent.

D. HOLIDAY SCHEDULE

Holiday schedule takes priority over the regular time-sharing schedule.

Holiday Even Years Odd Years
New Year's Eve
New Year’s Day
Spring Vacation
Easter
4th of July
Halloween
Veteran’s Day
Thanksgiving
Hanukkah
Christmas Eve
Christmas Day
Winter Break
Child’s Birthday
Mother's Day
Father's Day

Other Holidays:

Telephone Contact:

Other:

E. PARENTAL ACCESS TO RECORDS AND INFORMATION

Both parents are entitled to equal access to documents and other information concerning the minor children.

F. EDUCATIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

OR

Major educational decisions will be made by after consulting other parent.

G. MEDICAL AND DENTAL ARRANGEMENTS

OR

Major medical/dental decisions will be made by after consulting other parent.

H. RELIGIOUS EDUCATION ARRANGEMENTS

faith.

I. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS AND COMMENTS

days.

Method of Communication:

Frequency of Communication:

Methods:

NOTICE

Do not deviate from plan until dispute is resolved.

PART 2: SIGNATURE OF ONE OR BOTH PARENTS

Signature of Party A

Date

Signature of Party B

Date

PART 3: STATEMENT REGARDING CONTACT WITH SEX OFFENDERS AND PERSONS CONVICTED OF DANGEROUS CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN

According to A.R.S. §25-403.05, a child’s parent or custodian must immediately notify the other parent or custodian if the person knows that a convicted or registered sex offender or someone who has been convicted of a dangerous crime against children may have access to the child.

Notice may be provided by first class mail, return receipt requested, electronic means, or another form of communication accepted by the court.

Dangerous crime against children includes offenses such as second degree murder, aggravated assault, sexual assault, molestation, sexual conduct with a minor, child abuse, kidnapping, and others listed by statute.

PART 3: SIGNATURE OF ONE OR BOTH PARENTS

Signature of Party A

Date

Signature of Party B

Date

PART 4: JOINT LEGAL DECISION MAKING (JOINT LEGAL CUSTODY) AGREEMENT

A. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

B. DUI OR DRUG CONVICTIONS

If there has been domestic violence or a DUI or drug conviction, attach an extra page explaining why joint legal decision-making is still in the best interest of the children.

C. JOINT LEGAL DECISION-MAKING AGREEMENT

Review every month(s) from the date of this document.

Criteria required by Arizona law:

PART 4: SIGNATURES OF BOTH PARENTS REQUESTING JOINT LEGAL DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY

Signature of Party A

Date

Signature of Party B

Date

Enter text

What Joint Legal Decision Making Means

Joint Legal Decision Making is a parenting agreement or court order that gives both parents shared authority to make major decisions affecting a child’s welfare, including education, health care, and religious upbringing. It separates decision-making authority from physical custody and focuses on who has legal responsibility for long-term choices. The agreement can be established by mutual consent, incorporated into divorce or custody proceedings, or entered as a standalone parenting plan in family court. Parties often specify communication protocols, dispute-resolution steps, and how to amend the arrangement if circumstances change.

Why a Clear Joint Legal Decision Making Agreement Matters

A written joint legal decision making agreement reduces ambiguity about parental authority, helps avoid court disputes, and documents agreed processes for medical, educational, and religious choices. It clarifies responsibilities and creates a record that courts recognize when enforcing parental obligations.

Why a Clear Joint Legal Decision Making Agreement Matters

Who Typically Uses Joint Legal Decision Making

Parents negotiating custody, family law attorneys, mediators, and family court clerks commonly use this document when allocating decision-making authority for children.

  • Co-parents evenly sharing legal authority while living separately or together.
  • Attorneys preparing parenting plans for divorce or custody litigation.
  • Mediators documenting mutually agreed decision-making protocols.

The document also serves agencies and schools that may request written evidence of who may consent to education or medical services.

Key Parties and Professionals Involved

Co-parent

Two parents who share responsibility for major decisions about a child; both must understand the scope of authority, communication requirements, and amendment process to avoid later disputes.

Family Attorney

A family law attorney reviews legal language, confirms enforceability under state law, and ensures the agreement aligns with existing court orders or parenting plans before filing.

Essential Elements to Include in a Professional Agreement

A complete Joint Legal Decision Making document should clearly name parties, identify children, define decision areas, specify communication protocols, outline dispute resolution, and state how to amend or terminate the arrangement.

Parties

Full legal names and contact information for each parent and, if applicable, a guardian or third party authorized to receive notices.

Children

List each child by full name and date of birth to avoid ambiguity across medical, educational, and legal records.

Decision Areas

Specify which major decisions are joint (education, medical, religion) and which, if any, can be made unilaterally.

Communication Protocol

Describe required notice periods, preferred communication channels, and how urgent decisions are handled.

Dispute Resolution

Include mediation, arbitration, or court procedures to resolve disagreements before filing motions in family court.

Amendment & Termination

Explain how changes are made, whether written consent is required, and conditions for court modification.

Step-by-Step: Drafting and Finalizing the Agreement

Follow a clear sequence to create an enforceable joint legal decision making agreement that reflects both parties’ intent and complies with local court practices.

  • 01
    Gather Information: Collect names, DOBs, addresses, and existing court orders.
  • 02
    Draft Terms: Define decision areas, notice periods, and dispute processes.
  • 03
    Review & Revise: Have each party and counsel review language for clarity and legality.
  • 04
    Execute & File: Sign per jurisdictional rules, notarize if required, and file with family court if needed.

Digital Workflow for Completing and Signing Online

An electronic workflow speeds execution and creates an audit trail while preserving legal requirements for intent, consent, attribution, and retention.

  • Prepare Document: Upload finalized agreement and map signature, date, and initial fields.
  • Set Authentication: Choose signer authentication (email, SMS code, or stronger) consistent with court expectations.
  • Send for Signature: Distribute signing links or invites in the specified order to each party.
  • Archive Executed Copy: Store signed PDF with audit trail and distribute copies to parties and counsel.

Recommended Online Configuration for Joint Legal Decision Making

Configure fields and security settings to reflect document sensitivity and the need for an evidentiary audit trail.

Field Configuration
Authentication Email link or SMS code; use KBA for higher assurance.
Conditional Fields Show custody-specific fields only when chosen options apply.
Templates Save a template for repeatable parenting-plan clauses.
Notifications Enable signer reminders and completion receipts.

Technical and Integration Considerations for eSigning

Choose a platform that supports required authentication, audit trails, and file formats used by courts and service providers.

  • Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Microsoft 365 integrations available.
  • File Types: Accepts PDF, DOCX, HTML and Excel inputs/outputs.
  • Security: Encryption in transit and at rest.

Confirm the chosen provider supports notarization workflows, RON sessions where permitted, and long-term storage for audit records.

Typical Timelines and Court Processing Expectations

Timing depends on whether the agreement is filed with a court, the court’s caseload, and whether parties seek immediate temporary orders.

Filing Timeframe:

Court filing can be same day to several weeks depending on jurisdiction.

Court Review:

Review and entry as an order often takes 2–12 weeks on average.

Notarization:

Notarization or witnesses may be required before filing in some states.

RON Availability:

Remote notarization can speed execution where state law permits.

Effective Date:

Effective date is the date listed in the document or court entry date.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Using informal language that leaves decision areas ambiguous and invites later disputes.
  • Failing to list children by full legal name and date of birth, causing administrative confusion.
  • Skipping notarization where state practice or court rules expect it, risking rejection at filing.
  • Omitting an amendment process, making future changes cumbersome and litigation-prone.

Consequences of an Incorrect or Incomplete Agreement

Invalid Agreement: May be unenforceable
Conflict With Order: Could contradict existing court orders
Identity Errors: Mismatched names hinder enforcement
Missing Signatures: May be rejected by court
Delayed Protection: Rights may not take effect immediately
Enforcement Costs: Leads to extra attorney and court fees

eSignature Vendor Snapshot for Completing Joint Legal Decision Making

Compare core pricing and capability points for typical eSignature providers. signNow appears first as a documented option; verify final plan details with each vendor before purchase.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial Yes, 7-day trial Varies Varies Varies Varies
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No

Security and Compliance Features to Verify

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES-256 at rest
HIPAA: Business Associate Agreement required for PHI handling
21 CFR Part 11: Support for electronic records and signatures where needed
SOC 2: SOC 2 Type II compliance and reports available
ISO: ISO 27001-certified information security management
Accessibility: WCAG 2.0 Level AA conformance for accessibility

Real-World Examples of Digital Execution and Use

These brief customer examples illustrate how organizations use electronic signatures to complete binding agreements and improve workflow.

Optica Ventures (Brian Fitzgibbons)

The interface is simple and easy-to-use for our team; more importantly, it is just as easy for our customers.

  • Faster turnaround on executed documents.
  • The result was reliable completion and fewer follow-ups, helping maintain client experience while ensuring executed agreements are securely archived.

Xerox (Kodi-Marie Evans)

airSlate SignNow provides us with the flexibility needed to get the right signatures on the right documents, in the right formats, based on our integration with NetSuite.

  • Integration reduced manual steps.
  • This enabled consistent processing across departments and simplified recordkeeping for legal and HR teams managing sensitive documents.

Frequently Asked Questions About Joint Legal Decision Making

Answers to common questions about validity, execution, modification, and digital signing of joint legal decision making agreements.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users