Cover Information
Protocol title, version number, effective date, and concise project summary that frames scope and objectives for reviewers.
A complete, well-organized protocol application reduces review delays, lowers the risk of noncompliance, and creates a clear record for audit and oversight. Properly documented submissions clarify responsibilities, document consent and data handling plans, and support defensible decision-making across institutional and regulatory reviews.
The form is prepared by investigators or project leads and routed to institutional approvers, oversight committees, and administrative officers.
The PI signs to confirm technical accuracy, human-subject protections, and adherence to the submitted protocol. The PI’s signature indicates responsibility for study conduct, reporting adverse events, and following institutional policies; institutional delegation records should match the PI listed on the form.
An institutional signatory (department chair, sponsored programs officer, or designated signatory) signs to certify institutional approval, resource commitments, and legal compliance. This person must have delegated authority under internal policy to bind the institution for approvals and overhead commitments.
Protocol title, version number, effective date, and concise project summary that frames scope and objectives for reviewers.
Full legal names, roles, contact information, institutional affiliations, and relevant training or certifications for all named personnel.
Clear description of study design, procedures, participant interaction, data collection instruments, and inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Risks identification, mitigation measures, data safety monitoring plans, and procedures for reporting adverse events or breaches.
List of required approvals (IRB, biosafety, radiation, data use agreements), funding source, and supporting documentation attachments.
Designated signature blocks, delegated authority attestations, and dates for investigator, departmental signatory, and human research protection office.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Signer Authentication | Email link + optional SMS code |
| Conditional Fields | Show fields when checkbox selected |
| Required Attachments | Enforce PDF upload before submit |
| Audit Trail | Enable IP, timestamp, action log |
Choose distribution methods that match reviewer access and required authentication levels.
Typically 3–14 business days depending on workload
Often scheduled monthly; allow 4–6 weeks
Allow 1–3 weeks for administrative recheck
Variable; may add weeks to months
Set by institution after final signatures are recorded
Application and all attachments prepared and internally reviewed
Document uploaded and routed to IRB and departmental reviewers
Committee issues approval, conditional approval, or requests revisions
Designated signatories record signatures and effective date
Save a flattened, signed PDF/A that preserves visible signatures, embedded timestamp, and a copy of the audit trail for long-term archiving.
Export an editable DOCX version for internal edits or versioning; ensure signatures are captured in the signed PDF copy.
Export metadata and form fields as XML or CSV for records systems, registries, or sponsor portals requiring structured data.
Produce a compiled packet (PDF) that includes the application, attachments, approval stamps, and the audit trail for physical archive needs.
Optica centralized protocol submission to reduce confusion around attachments
The center standardized investigator attestations across clinics
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | Yes, 7-day trial | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Envelope Cap | No cap | 100 envelopes/user/year | Varies | Varies | Varies |