Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

National Fisheries College Kavieng Intake 2018 Form

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

REQUEST FOR RECALCULATION OF PATENT TERM ADJUSTMENT IN VIEW OF WYETH

Doc Code: PET.PTA.RCAL

Document Description: Request for Recalculation in view of Wyeth

Approved for use through 08/31/2013. OMB 0651-0020

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.

REQUEST FOR RECALCULATION OF PATENT TERM ADJUSTMENT
IN VIEW OF WYETH*

PATENTEE HEREBY REQUESTS RECALCULATION OF THE PATENT TERM ADJUSTMENT (PTA) UNDER 35 USC 154(b) INDICATED ON THE ABOVE-IDENTIFIED PATENT. THE PATENTEE’S SOLE BASIS FOR REQUESTING THE RECALCULATION IS THE USPTO’S PRE-WYETH INTERPRETATION OF 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A).

Note: This form is only for requesting a recalculation of PTA for patents issued before March 2, 2010, if the sole basis for requesting the recalculation is the USPTO’s pre-Wyeth interpretation of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A). See Instruction Sheet on page 2 for more information.

Patentees are reminded that to preserve the right to review in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia of the USPTO’s patent term adjustment determination, a patentee must ensure that he or she also takes the steps required under 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(3) and (b)(4) and 37 CFR 1.705 in a timely manner.

*Wyeth v. Kappos, No. 2009-1120 (Fed. Cir., Jan. 7, 2010).

Note: Signatures of all the inventors or assignees of record of the entire interest or their representative(s) are required in accordance with 37 CFR 1.33 and 11.18. Please see 37 CFR 1.4(d) for the form of the signature. If necessary, submit multiple forms for more than one signature, see below*.

The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.11 and 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 10 minutes to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.

If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 and select option 2.

Instruction Sheet for: REQUEST FOR RECALCULATION OF PATENT TERM ADJUSTMENT IN VIEW OF WYETH

(Not to be Submitted to the USPTO)

This form is only for requesting a recalculation of PTA for patents issued before March 2, 2010, if the sole basis for requesting the recalculation is the USPTO’s pre-Wyeth interpretation of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A).

This form must be filed within 180 days of the day the patent was granted, with the following exception:

Patentees who received a decision from the USPTO under the USPTO’s pre-Wyeth interpretation of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A) may file a request for reconsideration of that decision if such a request for reconsideration is filed within two months of the date of the decision (37 CFR 1.181(f)). If the patentee’s sole basis for requesting reconsideration of the decision is the USPTO’s pre-Wyeth interpretation of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A), the request for reconsideration need only state that reconsideration is being requested in view of Wyeth (this form may be used for this purpose if it is filed within two months of the date of the decision from the USPTO).

Do not use this form if the application has been allowed, but not yet issued as a patent.

1. For patents issued before March 2, 2010: A request for reconsideration under 37 CFR 1.705(d) and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.18(e) are not required, provided that the patentee’s sole basis for requesting recalculation of the PTA in the patent is the USPTO’s pre-Wyeth interpretation of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A) and this form is filed within 180 days of the day the patent was granted.

2. For patents issued on or after March 2, 2010 (do not use this form): Patentees seeking a revised PTA in a patent issued on or after March 2, 2010, must file a request for reconsideration under 37 CFR 1.705(d) that complies with the requirements of 37 CFR 1.705(b)(1) and (b)(2) within two months of the day the patent issued.

For more information, see “Notice Concerning Calculation of the Patent Term Adjustment With Respect to the Overlapping Delay Provision of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(A)” available on the USPTO Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/patents/law/notices/2010.jsp.

*Wyeth v. Kappos, No. 2009-1120 (Fed. Cir., Jan. 7, 2010).

Privacy Act Statement

The Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-579) requires that you be given certain information in connection with your submission of the attached form related to a patent application or patent. Accordingly, pursuant to the requirements of the Act, please be advised that: (1) the general authority for the collection of this information is 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2); (2) furnishing of the information solicited is voluntary; and (3) the principal purpose for which the information is used by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is to process and/or examine your submission related to a patent application or patent. If you do not furnish the requested information, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may not be able to process and/or examine your submission, which may result in termination of proceedings or abandonment of the application or expiration of the patent.

The information provided by you in this form will be subject to the following routine uses:

1. The information on this form will be treated confidentially to the extent allowed under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C 552a). Records from this system of records may be disclosed to the Department of Justice to determine whether disclosure of these records is required by the Freedom of Information Act.

2. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, in the course of presenting evidence to a court, magistrate, or administrative tribunal, including disclosures to opposing counsel in the course of settlement negotiations.

3. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Member of Congress submitting a request involving an individual, to whom the record pertains, when the individual has requested assistance from the Member with respect to the subject matter of the record.

4. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a contractor of the Agency having need for the information in order to perform a contract. Recipients of information shall be required to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(m).

5. A record related to an International Application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization, pursuant to the Patent Cooperation Treaty.

6. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to another federal agency for purposes of National Security review (35 U.S.C. 181) and for review pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 218(c)).

7. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the Administrator, General Services, or his/her designee, during an inspection of records conducted by GSA as part of that agency’s responsibility to recommend improvements in records management practices and programs, under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906. Such disclosure shall be made in accordance with the GSA regulations governing inspection of records for this purpose, and any other relevant (i.e., GSA or Commerce) directive. Such disclosure shall not be used to make determinations about individuals.

8. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the public after either publication of the application pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b) or issuance of a patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 151. Further, a record may be disclosed, subject to the limitations of 37 CFR 1.14, as a routine use, to the public if the record was filed in an application which became abandoned or in which the proceedings were terminated and which application is referenced by either a published application, an application open to public inspection or an issued patent.

9. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Federal, State, or local law enforcement agency, if the USPTO becomes aware of a violation or potential violation of law or regulation.

Enter text✕
Prepare your document for signing right on this page
  • 01 Edit the text and complete the fields
  • 02 Click Sign Now and on the next screen add recipients and signature fields in SignNow
  • 03 Start your free trial to sign and send your doc
Sign Now

What the National Fisheries College Kavieng Intake 2018 Form Is

National Fisheries College Kavieng Intake 2018 Form is the standardized application used by the college to collect applicant identity details, academic history, program preferences, medical declarations, emergency contacts, and consent statements required for enrollment processing and placement. Admissions and administrative staff use the completed form to verify eligibility, coordinate course assignments, and create a permanent record for student files. This guidance explains required fields, submission options, timelines, and the electronic signing considerations relevant to ESIGN and UETA frameworks in U.S. contexts.

Why a Standardized Intake Form Matters

Using the National Fisheries College Kavieng Intake 2018 Form standardizes eligibility review, reduces processing errors, and creates a verifiable record for admissions and accreditation. Proper completion ensures compliance with recordkeeping rules and supports lawful electronic signature capture under ESIGN and UETA where applicable.

Why a Standardized Intake Form Matters

Who Completes and Relies on This Form

Prospective students and admissions staff use this form to record applicant data, verify credentials, and manage intake logistics.

  • Prospective students — applicants seeking entry to the 2018 intake; complete all identification and education sections.
  • Admissions officers — review eligibility, confirm documents, and record decisions for each applicant.
  • Program administrators — coordinate placements, medical clearances, and training schedules based on form data.

External referees and medical providers may submit supporting documents; they are not primary signatories on the intake form.

Representative User Profiles

Applicant — Prospective Student

A typical applicant completes personal details, prior education, program preferences, and medical declarations. Provide accurate government ID and contact information; mismatched names can delay admission or trigger identity verification checks during processing.

Admissions Officer — Registrar

The registrar reviews submitted forms, confirms transcripts and certificates, and records outcomes in student information systems. They ensure retention policies are applied and that electronic signatures meet ESIGN/UETA standards for admissibility.

Core Sections to Include on a Professional Intake Form

A professional intake form groups applicant data, documentation checklists, consent statements, and signature fields to streamline review and ensure records meet institutional and regulatory standards.

Applicant Details

Collect full legal name, preferred name, date of birth, nationality, and contact details. Accurate identification data is essential for enrollment verification and background checks required by program policies and placement decisions.

Academic Record

Provide previous institutions, attendance dates, qualifications earned, and transcripts. Certified transcripts where required speed evaluation; incomplete academic histories slow credential checks and can delay offers.

Program Selection

Identify preferred course, specialization, and intake term. Include alternate choices and list prerequisites completed so administrators can place applicants accurately and manage cohort capacity.

Medical & Emergency

Disclose allergies, chronic conditions, immunizations, and emergency contact details. This information is used to arrange medical clearance and to plan safe fieldwork placements and emergency response.

Declarations & Consents

Consent to data processing, media release, and code of conduct acceptance must be clearly indicated. Explicit consent supports lawful records retention and student administration under applicable laws.

Signature & Date

Signature area for student and admissions officer with dated confirmation. Electronic signatures must meet ESIGN/UETA criteria and include timestamp evidence to preserve auditability.

Step-by-Step: Filling and Submitting the Intake Form

Complete the form in sequence, attach required documents, and submit via the admissions channel specified below.

  • 01
    Prepare Documents: Gather ID, transcripts, and medical records
  • 02
    Fill Form: Enter details carefully using MM/DD/YYYY dates
  • 03
    Attach Files: Upload PDFs or clear images
  • 04
    Submit: Send to admissions email or portal

How to Configure an Online Intake Workflow

Configure the online intake workflow to collect fields, require signatures, and route documents for staged review and record retention.

Field Configuration
Signature Type Email link with optional SMS code
Required Attachments Transcripts, ID scan, and medical form
Authentication Level Email verification; KBA optional for higher assurance
Routing Sequential review: admissions then registrar

What Happens After You Submit the Form

After submission, the form moves through verification, acceptance, enrollment, and records entry stages managed by college staff.

  • Upload: Applicant uploads completed form and attachments
  • Verify: Admissions validates ID and academic records
  • Decision: Committee reviews and returns acceptance notice
  • Enroll: Accepted students complete registration and fee payment

Technical and Security Requirements for eSubmission

Set platform integration and file-format requirements to support admissions workflows, secure storage, and audit trails.

  • File Formats: PDF, DOCX, or scanned image
  • Integrations: Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, NetSuite
  • Security: TLS, AES-256 at rest

Required Information and Fields (At-a-Glance)

Full Legal Name: Exact name as on government ID
Date of Birth: Enter in MM/DD/YYYY format
Contact Details: Phone, email, and mailing address
Education History: List institutions, dates, qualifications
Medical Information: List allergies, conditions, emergency contact
Signature Block: Signer name, date, and position

Common Preparation Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Leaving fields blank for prior education or program selection often requires follow-up and can disqualify a candidate during batch reviews.
  • Uploading low-quality scans of certificates or IDs prevents verification and increases processing time for admissions staff and credential evaluators.
  • Using inconsistent name formats across supporting documents (initials vs full name) delays identity confirmation and may require notarized affidavits.
  • Failing to read medical declaration instructions can result in missing health-clearance requirements and postponed placements for practical training components.

Consequences of Incorrect or Incomplete Submissions

Incomplete Application: Admission may be delayed
Mismatched Identity: Triggers verification, possible rejection
Missing Documents: Transcripts or certificates required
Late Submission: May miss intake window
False Statements: May lead to expulsion
Electronic Consent Lapse: Invalid signature if consent absent

Practical Steps to Complete the Form Efficiently

Follow consistent formats, verify attachments before upload, and record all communications to reduce processing delays and maintain auditability.

Use government-issued name and ID numbers
Enter names exactly as shown on passports or national IDs and double-check identification numbers. Inconsistent entries often trigger manual verification, which extends processing time and can affect eligibility determinations.
Prepare certified copies of academic documents
Obtain certified or notarized copies where certificates must be verified. High-quality scans in PDF format prevent misinterpretation and speed transcript evaluation during admissions reviews.
Confirm medical disclosures and clearances
Read medical sections carefully and provide up-to-date immunization records. Failure to disclose relevant conditions can lead to delayed placement or required medical clearance before practical training.
Keep a signed copy for records
Retain a dated, signed copy of the completed intake form. Institutional record retention requirements and student appeals processes depend on preserved originals or authenticated electronic records.

Typical Deadlines and Processing Time Expectations

Adhere to the intake calendar to avoid missed placements; deadlines vary by program and cohort capacity.

Application Deadline:

Typically set by college per cohort

Document Submission Due:

Often two weeks after application

Medical Clearance Deadline:

Before fieldwork or practical training

Acceptance Notifications:

Sent within four to six weeks

Enrollment Confirmation:

Due before term start and fee payment

Practical Examples of Digital Intake Workflows

Admissions teams and training coordinators have digitized intake forms to reduce manual work, centralize attachments, and create time-stamped records for decisions and appeals.

College Admissions Example

A mid-sized college converted paper intake forms to a single digital form, consolidating document uploads and applicant data collection.

  • Reduced follow-up queries by standardizing fields.
  • Electronic routing and an audit trail shortened review cycles, decreased missing document incidents, and provided reliable, time-stamped records for admissions decisions and appeals.

Healthcare Training Intake

A vocational training provider added medical clearance fields and electronic signatures to streamline health verification for field placements.

  • Secured health data under HIPAA controls.
  • Secure handling of medical information reduced delays, allowed faster placement into practical sessions, and created a defensible records trail for student health documentation.

Baseline eSignature Plans and Feature Availability

The following table compares baseline eSignature pricing and feature availability across common vendors to help estimate eSigning costs for intake processing.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day trial Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies Varies Varies

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to common questions about completing, submitting, and electronically signing the National Fisheries College Kavieng Intake 2018 Form.


Need help? Contact support

Explore Templates

Pre-Employment Health Declaration Pre-Employment Health Declaration Maritime Health Declaration Form MPC 400 Medical Certificate Marathon Medical Certificate Emergency Certificate
be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users
Sign Now
Company
Forms
Pricing
Resources
Knowledge base
Other Products
© 2026 airSlate Inc. All rights reserved.