Fill and Sign the No Petitionerplaintiff Note for Calendar Civilprobate Form

- 1 - IN THE ______________ COURT OF ______________ COUNTY STATE OF ________________ ) ) ) Petitioner/Plaintiff, ) ) ) NO. Vs. ) ) ) Respondent/Defendant ) ) MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A NEW TRIAL Plaintiff, __________, pursuant to Rules ____ and ____ of the __________ Rules of Civil Procedure, by and through counsel, moves the Court for a Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial, and in support thereof of states as follows: BACKGROUND 1. On the _____ day of _____________, 20___, this case was tried before a __________ County jury. 2. During the trial, the Defendant unduly prejudiced and misled the jury by asking the Plaintiff and other witnesses about an "arrest of Plaintiff” and about Plaintiff's alleged drug and alcohol problem." The defendant had no evidence concerning a conviction of a crime nor ever substantiated any alcohol or drug abuse, even though the defendant asked each witness whether they had information about the Plaintiff's alleged alcohol and drug abuse. The defendant continued to build its entire case on the alleged lack of character a nd the alleged - 2 - immoral conduct of the Plaintiff. Defendant, without any evidence to support its position, then argued on closing that the Plaintiff had poor character, that she had an alcohol proble m, abused drugs and was known for her "partying". 3. All of the evidence presented in this case, including testimony of the Plaintiff, testimony of __________, testimony of a medical physician, medical records and interrogatory responses of the Defendant, overwhelmingly proved that Plaintiff went into __________ on the ______ day of __________, 20____, slipped on water that was admittedly left on the floor after putting bags of ice into an ice cooler and was injured. No other evidence existed. T he Defendant’s entire defense was a theory that the Plaintiff lied about the fall bec ause the Defendant had no information that it ever occurred. This is not only contradicted by the testimony of the Plaintiff, testimony of Ms. __________, testimony of the physician and the other medical records but is also contradicted directly by the responses to discovery whi ch stated that the manager of the store remembered a lady falling by the ice cooler on t he same day that __________ fell. 4. Pursuant to Rule ____ of the __________ Rules of Evidence, the admission of a person's arrest is strictly prohibited and can only be admitted if a person has been convict ed of a crime that is punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year, or the convict ion of the crime involving dishonesty or false statement. There is absolutely no substantiation that Plaintiff was convicted of a crime. The defense apparently received the information concerning an arrest from a pleading filed in a pending divorce procedure, which clearly only alleged that an arrest was made of the Plaintiff for non-criminal purposes. 5. Further, questions concerning the alleged alcohol and drug abuse were totally impermissible and unduly prejudicial. Rule ____ of the __________ Rules of Evidence states - 3 - that the credibility of a witness __________ only be attacked by evidence as it relates to her reputation for truthfulness and untruthfulness. Questions concerning an allegation of drug and alcohol abuse were totally irrelevant to Plaintiff's reputation for truthfulness and was unduly prejudicial to the Plaintiff's case. The prejudicial nature of the questioning, parti cularly without any creditable evidence that was presented, the Plaintiff is entitled to a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. NEW TRIAL 10. In the alternative, Plaintiff is entitled to a new trial since the que stions and argument by the Defendant so unduly prejudiced the jury that the jury was unable to fairly review the credible evidence presented at the trial and render a fair verdict. 11. "A new trial shall be granted in a number of circumstances, such as when the verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, or when the jury has been c onfused by faulty jury instructions, or when the jury has departed from its oath and its verdict is a result of bias, passion, and prejudice." _________v.________, _________ (____. _____). A Motion for New Trial authorizes "the trial judge to set aside any or all parts of the issue s tried and [to) grant a new trial as justice requires." Comment, ______. R.Civ.P. ___. At least six factors ha ve been provided by the __________ Supreme Court for this Court to consider when determining whether a new trial should be granted. _________v.________, _________ (____. _____). The six factors to be considered are as follows: (1) Has the search for the true facts proceeded as far as it reasonable [sic] can under the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case? (2) To what extent would it be unfair to the party in whose favor the verdict was returned in effect to give that party's adversary a second bite at the apple? - 4 - (3) Considering the evidence, is there a substantial basis for belief that the jury disregarded their oaths and failed to follow the instructions of the Court in reaching its verdict? (4) Assuming arguendo that the verdict is unjust (by reference to the underlying facts of the transaction or occurrence, the complete truth of which we will never know), what is the impact of that "injustice" upon the party against whom the verdict is returned? (5) If a new trial is ordered, will the party in whose favor the verdict has been returned be deprived of some fair advantage he enjoyed in the first trial? And, (6) Are there any other factors present, peculiar to the particular case of the parti es, that would render just or unjust the grant or denial of a new trial? 12. It is totally impermissible to create a defense, by asking prejudicial questions about the Plaintiff's conduct without substantiation, and argue to the jury the same non-substantiated conduct should be the basis of their verdict. The defense irreparably tainte d the jury when it asked inappropriate questions about an arrest and alleged alcohol and drug problems. The defense continued to taint the jury as it inappropriately argued to the jury that Plaintiff's "conduct" would support a finding for the defense. It is obvious, since the overwhelming evidence in this case proved that Plaintiff was injured due to the neglige nce of the Defendant, that the Defense's inappropriate questions and argument did not allow the jury t o fairly view the evidence and return a fair and just verdict. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, __________, respectfully requests this Court to enter a judgment in her favor notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, enter an order granting Plaintiff a new trial. - 5 - This the ____ day of __________, 20____.Respectfully submitted, Dated: Name: Title: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Fax: E-Mail: Attorney No.: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, ______________________________, do hereby certify that I have this day mailed, U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing to __________________________________, at the following address; ___________________________________________________________________ THIS the ____ day of _____________, 20____.