Performance Criteria
List job responsibilities and competency statements used to evaluate exempt employees. Tie each criterion to measurable indicators or examples to support objective assessments and reduce subjective bias during reviews.
A consistent appraisal process clarifies expectations, documents performance objectively, supports merit and promotion decisions, and creates defensible records for HR actions. It reduces bias, improves development discussions, and supplies evidence needed for audits, reviews, or employment disputes.
HR professionals, direct managers, and exempt employees typically complete or participate in the appraisal process.
List job responsibilities and competency statements used to evaluate exempt employees. Tie each criterion to measurable indicators or examples to support objective assessments and reduce subjective bias during reviews.
Define rating levels (for example: exceeds expectations, meets expectations, needs improvement) and explain scoring rules. Clarify how ratings affect merit reviews, promotion decisions, and improvement plans.
Provide specific, dated examples of work outcomes, project contributions, and leadership behaviors. Require citations of deliverables or metrics to substantiate ratings and to create an auditable record.
Document agreed actions, training, milestones, and target completion dates. Assign owners for each action and include resources or support the employee needs to meet developmental objectives.
Record short- and long-term goals with measurable KPIs and timelines. Include baseline performance and success criteria so progress tracking is consistent across review cycles.
Include reviewer, employee, and HR signature blocks with dates. Capture electronic signature metadata—signer identity, timestamp, and role—to maintain a complete audit trail.
| Field name and purpose guide | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Routing and approval sequence (manager to HR) | Manager → HR approval → Employee acknowledgment and sign-off |
| Authentication and access verification settings | Email link with optional SMS code or SAML SSO for higher assurance |
| Required fields and validation rules | Ratings, development plan, and signatures set as required before finalization |
| Retention and archival schedule for records | Retain according to HR policy; encrypted storage and access logging |
Choose a secure eSignature platform that supports audit trails, role-based routing, and retention controls.
Typically 30–90 days to complete review
Submit at least 7 days before manager meeting
Complete manager review within 14 days of meeting
Employee signs within 7 days of receipt
File signed appraisal within 14 days; retention clock begins
HR opens review window and notifies participants
Employee returns self-evaluation before the manager meeting
Manager finalizes scores and comments after discussion
Signatures captured; document archived with audit trail
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial | Varies by vendor | Varies by vendor | Varies by vendor | Varies by vendor |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Martin Properties standardized appraisal distribution using digital workflows to collect manager reviews and employee acknowledgements without in-person meetings.
Xerox integrated appraisal templates with HRIS and eSignature to prefill data and route reviews to appropriate managers automatically.
Managers hold primary authority to evaluate performance, document examples, set ratings, and propose development actions. Their signature confirms review completion and the factual basis for ratings; HR may require additional signoff for higher-level decisions or disputes.
HR administers templates, enforces retention schedules, stores signed appraisals in personnel files, and may countersign to confirm administrative review. HR provides documentation for audits, legal inquiries, or compensation actions.