Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Texas Course Syllabus for Foundations of Research in Education

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

The University of Texas at Brownsville
College of Education
Syllabus EDCI-6300.61.62, Spring 2012
Foundations of Research in Education

Department of Teaching, Learning & Innovation

Course Number and Title: EDCI-6300.61.62

Course Title: Foundations of Research in Education

Semester and year: Spring 2012

Prerequisite: Graduate status

Professor: Dr. Alberto José Herrera

Office: EDBC #1.316

Office Phone: (956) 882-6702, Cell: (956) 497-1053

Office Hours: Monday, Tuesday (2:30-4:00 pm) & Thursday (3:00-4:00 pm), Wednesday (10:00-11:00am), Friday and other times by appointment

Email: Alberto.J.Herrera@utb.edu

Classroom Location: On-line

Course Catalog Description:

The course is an introduction to research methodology in education. It focuses on the relationship between research problem, questions and design and introduces students to techniques for collecting and analyzing research data. The course emphasis is on writing an analysis and synthesis of research methodology and findings in empirical articles. Lec 3, Cr 3

Required Texts:

Patten, M. L. (2009) Understanding research methods: An overview of the essentials. (7th ed). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak publishing

American Psychological Association (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th Ed). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Suggested Reference Text:

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., Airasian, P. (2012) Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson publishing.

Course Description Expanded and Purpose of the Course:

This course offers an exciting opportunity to learn the founding principles and methods of classical research in education.

Course Objectives:

Describe the role of philosophy, epistemology, and theory in education research (Units 1 & 5);

Explain the nature of the different types of research paradigms/methods in education (Units 1, 3, 4, 5);

Demonstrate understanding of research design and how methodology is selected, data analyzed, and findings interpreted;

Compare and contrast quantitative and qualitative research methods (Units 3, 4, 5);

Describe and interpret statistical techniques such as descriptive and inferential statistics (Unit 2);

Describe data collection and analysis techniques in qualitative research (Unit 4);

Demonstrate skill in using library and internet resources to identify peer reviewed empirical research articles (Unit 1);

Analyze and evaluate reports/articles of empirical research in education (Units 1-5);

Demonstrate the ability to synthesize research literature by writing a review of literature (Units 1-5);

Communicate knowledge and ideas through writing well-developed academic papers following disciplinary genre and formatting requirements (Units 1-5).

Major Assignments:

Project One: Statement of the Research Problem - Students will choose a topic of interest and use it as an anchor for selecting and analyzing research articles and doing the literature analysis.

Project Two: Article Analysis - Students will select five empirical research articles from peer reviewed journals and analyze research design, theory, methods, and claims.

Project Three: Research Literature Synthesis - Students will read peer-reviewed research articles and synthesize the literature based on analyses carried out throughout the course.

Project Four: Learning Presentation - Students will present their literature synthesis and learning throughout the semester in a 10-15 minute PowerPoint presentation.

Discussion Board assignments, class activities, homework, and quizzes - In-class and homework assignments, tests, and quizzes as required by the course instructor.

Evaluation and Grade Assignment:

Project One: Statement of the research problem

Project Two: Article analysis

Project Three: Research literature synthesis

Project Four: Learning presentation

Discussion Board, class activities, homework, quizzes

Contributions to the course, online class participation

Total:

Grading Scale:

900 - 1000 pts A

800 - 899 B

700 - 799 C

600 - 699 D

< 600 F

Course Policies:

1. Complete all assignments by the required due date.

2. Please word process all assignments.

3. Name your Microsoft document file with your name and date.

4. The instructor reserves the right to make changes in the syllabus as deemed necessary.

Institutional Policies:

Satisfactory Academic Progress: GPA of 2.0 or higher and successful course completion of at least 70% of course work attempted.

Scholastic Dishonesty: Cheating, plagiarism, collusion, and other unfair advantage acts are prohibited.

Students Academic Responsibilities: Students are expected to attend class regularly and on time and are responsible for all class work and assignments.

Emergency Policy Statement: Course materials and communication may be made available through MyUTBTSC Blackboard and UTB email in case of emergency.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Students requesting accommodations should notify Disability Services early in the semester.

Addendum 2: Rating Sheet for the Research Literature Synthesis

1) Effectiveness of the Introduction: Clear focus, awareness of topic, relevant overview.

2) Currency & relevance of the literature cited: Current studies, trends, strengths, weaknesses, gaps.

3) Analysis of individual articles and demonstrated knowledge of the topic.

4) Effectiveness of the Conclusion.

5) Mechanics and Grammar.

6) APA format.

7) Coherence & flow of the logic or path of the argument.

Total Score:

Student Name:

Date:

Signature:

Instructor Signature:

Additional Notes:

Enter text✕

What the Texas Course Syllabus for Foundations of Research in Education Is

The Texas Course Syllabus for Foundations of Research in Education is a structured course document used by Texas colleges and teacher-preparation programs to describe course purpose, scope, learning outcomes, assessments, schedule, policies, and required readings. It communicates instructor expectations to students, supports institutional accreditation and program review, and documents alignment with program learning goals and state or institutional standards. A professional syllabus is a working contract between instructor and students and serves administrative, pedagogical, and compliance functions throughout the academic term.

Why a Clear, Standards-Aligned Syllabus Matters

A complete syllabus reduces student confusion, supports learning consistency across sections, and documents decisions for accreditation and appeals. It provides transparency about assessment, grading, and academic integrity while helping departments confirm alignment to program competencies.

Why a Clear, Standards-Aligned Syllabus Matters

Who Prepares and Uses This Syllabus

Primary users include course instructors, program coordinators, departmental administrators and academic affairs staff who approve and publish syllabi.

  • Instructors and adjunct faculty who teach the course and must communicate expectations and assessments to students.
  • Program directors and curriculum committees who verify learning outcomes and accreditation alignment.
  • Registrar and LMS administrators who publish versions, manage term updates, and archive official copies.

Students and academic advisors also rely on the syllabus for enrollment decisions, prerequisite checks, and advising conversations.

Step-by-Step: Create and Approve Your Syllabus

Follow these steps to draft, review, approve, publish, and archive a compliant syllabus for the Foundations of Research in Education course.

  • 01
    Draft: Assemble course metadata, outcomes, schedule, assessments, and policies.
  • 02
    Review: Check alignment with program competencies and department templates.
  • 03
    Approve: Submit to program director or curriculum committee for sign-off.
  • 04
    Publish: Post to the LMS and registrar, and distribute to enrolled students.

Configuring an Online Syllabus Workflow

Set up a digital workflow so drafts route automatically for review, approval, and LMS publication.

Field Configuration
Template Use department-approved template with locked policy sections.
Reviewer Route Auto-route to program director then dean for final approval.
Authentication Require institutional single sign-on for approvers.
Archive Location Save final PDF to registrar archive and LMS course shell.

Technical Requirements for Digital Syllabus Delivery

Choose a platform that supports PDF, DOCX, LMS integration, and preserves version history.

  • File Formats: PDF and DOCX support
  • Integrations: LMS, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365
  • Authentication: SSO and audit trail

Confirm accessibility export (e.g., tagged PDF), document retention policies, and where signed or approved copies will be stored institutionally.

Where to Send and File the Final Syllabus

After approval, distribute and file the syllabus using institutional channels so it remains discoverable and auditable.

  • LMS Course Shell: Upload final PDF to the course module for students.
  • Registrar: Submit approved syllabus to registrar or central academic office.
  • Department Repository: Archive approved copy in the departmental shared drive.
  • Student Distribution: Distribute electronically to enrolled students before first class.

Essential Elements of a Professional Course Syllabus

A thorough syllabus balances clarity, compliance, and student support by including descriptive, procedural, and administrative sections used throughout the academic term.

Course Identification

Includes official course title, number, credit hours, semester, and prerequisite information. Accurate identification prevents registration errors and ensures consistent catalog mapping across sections.

Instructor Details

Full instructor name, institutional email, office hours, and preferred contact method. Clear contact details are essential for advising, accommodations, and timely student communication.

Course Description

Concise summary of topics, scope, and any special formats such as hybrid or field-based sessions to set student expectations from the first day.

Learning Outcomes

Measurable statements of what students should know or do by course end, linked to assessments and program competencies for accreditation.

Assessment Plan

List of assignments, exams, weights, due dates, and grading rubrics. Transparent assessment reduces grade disputes and supports defensible academic decisions.

Policies and Resources

Academic integrity, late work, accessibility, campus resources, required texts, and support services. Include links or contacts for disability services and counseling.

Security and Compliance Checklist

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES-256 at rest
Legal Frameworks: Complies with ESIGN and UETA
Privacy Rules: Consider FERPA for student data
Audit Trail: Retains timestamps, IP, and actions
HIPAA Consideration: BAA required if PHI included
Access Controls: Institutional SSO and role-based access

Consequences of an Incomplete or Incorrect Syllabus

Accreditation Risk: Program review or sanction
FERPA Violation: Potential privacy investigation
Grade Disputes: Increased appeals and audits
Student Complaints: Formal grievances or hearings
Liability Exposure: Refunds or legal claims possible
Recordkeeping Gaps: Difficulty supporting accreditation claims

Common Pitfalls When Preparing This Syllabus

  • Using vague learning outcomes makes assessment alignment difficult and weakens program-level reporting for accreditation and continuous improvement efforts.
  • Publishing inconsistent grading policies across sections can produce student confusion and lead to formal grade appeals or equity concerns.
  • Failing to include an accessibility statement and contact for disability services creates barriers for students and may violate campus policy or ADA obligations.
  • Not versioning the syllabus or archiving approved copies complicates dispute resolution and programme audits when multiple iterations exist.

Key Timing and Deadlines for Syllabus Preparation

Plan ahead to meet internal review, publication, and student distribution timelines tied to the academic calendar.

Syllabus submission to department office:

Typically due two weeks before term start for review and approval.

LMS publication to students:

Publish by the first day of classes or earlier per campus policy.

Add/drop deadline notification:

Include registration deadlines and drop penalties in the schedule section.

Midterm feedback window:

Provide formative feedback timeline to support student improvement.

Final grade submission deadline:

Adhere to registrar dates to avoid late-record penalties.

Milestones: Draft to Archive

Track these milestone stages so the syllabus moves from draft to published and archived in a controlled way.

01

Draft Completion

Instructor completes initial draft and self-checks alignment to template.

02

Department Review

Program director or curriculum committee reviews for consistency.

03

Official Approval

Dean or academic affairs signs off on final content.

04

Publishing and Archival

Upload to LMS, registrar archive, and departmental repository.

Realistic Examples of Syllabus Use

These two scenarios illustrate practical ways the syllabus supports instruction, assessment, and institutional reporting.

Case Study 1

A university instructor standardized learning outcomes across three sections to improve assessment comparability.

  • The change ensured consistent rubrics across graders.
  • As a result, the program produced comparable assessment data for accreditation, reduced grade disputes by improving transparency, and documented alignment with program-level competencies for the annual review process.

Case Study 2

A clinical-education course added a HIPAA training requirement and site-specific confidentiality clause to the syllabus.

  • Students completed training before placements.
  • This addition protected patient privacy, ensured clinical partners accepted students, and provided documentation for institutional compliance reviews and risk management.

eSignature Vendor Comparison for Syllabus Signing and Approval

Compare baseline pricing and common capabilities for popular e-signature vendors; signNow is listed first per platform comparison convention.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan
Bulk Send Yes Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to common questions about creating, approving, publishing, and legally validating the syllabus in Texas higher-education settings.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users