21 CFR Part 11 Compliant SignNow's CRM Vs Streak CRM

Check out the reviews of the airSlate SignNow CRM vs. Streak CRM to compare the benefits, features, tools, and pricing of each solution.

Award-winning eSignature solution

Overview: 21 CFR Part 11 compliance in signNow's CRM versus Streak CRM

21 CFR Part 11 defines criteria for electronic records and signatures used by FDA-regulated organizations. This comparison focuses on how a 21 cfr part 11 compliant signNow's CRM integration and Streak CRM address those requirements, including signature integrity, audit trails, user controls, and system validation. The intent is to clarify technical and procedural differences relevant to regulated industries so compliance officers, quality teams, and IT staff can assess whether the workflow and controls meet Part 11 expectations for electronic records and signing events.

Why Part 11 alignment matters for regulated workflows

Maintaining Part 11 alignment reduces regulatory risk, preserves evidentiary value of electronic records, and supports consistent audit-readiness for clinical, pharmaceutical, and medical device processes. Organizations that require validated electronic records should evaluate signature provenance, system controls, and documentation when choosing an eSignature-enabled CRM.

Why Part 11 alignment matters for regulated workflows

Common compliance and implementation challenges

  • Ensuring signature attribution and signer identity controls without introducing heavy manual processes that slow workflows.
  • Documenting system validation and change control to demonstrate consistent, reproducible behavior for electronic records.
  • Maintaining long-term audit logs and immutable timestamps while meeting internal retention and privacy rules.
  • Integrating eSignature evidence into CRM records while preserving chain-of-custody and exportable compliance artifacts.

Representative user profiles in regulated environments

Clinical QA Manager

A Clinical QA Manager oversees protocol compliance and document control across trials, requiring verifiable electronic approvals, traceable audit logs, and access controls that support inspection-ready records and periodic internal audits.

Research Coordinator

A Research Coordinator manages participant forms and consent workflows and needs clear signer authentication, easy-to-follow signing steps, and exportable records to bundle with case report forms and regulatory submissions.

Typical users and teams evaluating Part 11-capable eSignature CRM tools

Regulated organizations evaluate CRM plus eSignature combinations to ensure records and approvals meet audit and inspection expectations.

  • Quality assurance and compliance teams responsible for SOPs and regulatory submissions.
  • Clinical operations and research staff managing consent and trial documentation.
  • IT and validation teams implementing system controls and electronic record retention.

Decision teams typically balance technical controls, audit evidence availability, user experience, and integration with existing CRMs when selecting a compliant solution.

Expanded feature set for enterprise compliance and scale

Beyond core controls, look for features that support enterprise deployment, integrations, and centralized compliance oversight across teams and systems.

eSignature

Legally binding electronic signatures with signer authentication and recorded signature intent for regulated transactions and approvals.

Global Audit

Cross-document and cross-user audit capabilities that centralize logs and provide searchable reports for inspections and internal reviews.

Access Logs

Detailed access records showing who viewed or exported documents and when, to support chain-of-custody requirements.

Encryption

Strong at-rest and in-transit encryption to protect confidential clinical and patient data in line with HIPAA expectations.

Integrations

Pre-built connectors to CRMs, cloud storage, and document management systems to keep evidence tied to business records.

API

Programmable APIs for automated workflows, evidence extraction, and integration with validation scripts or QA tooling.

be ready to get more

Choose a better solution

Core features to evaluate for Part 11-capable CRM signing

Focus on features that directly support Part 11 requirements: evidence capture, controlled access, and maintainable audit artifacts across CRM records and document stores.

Audit Trail

Comprehensive, tamper-evident logs that record every document action, time-stamped events, and signer context to support inspection and review requirements.

Controlled Fields

Document-level field controls and validation that prevent modification after signing and enable consistent capture of required metadata for regulated process documentation.

Role Management

Granular role-based permissions and administrative controls so only authorized users can prepare, send, or approve documents in regulated workflows.

Exportable Evidence

Signed PDF bundles and machine-readable audit reports that can be exported and retained to satisfy archival and inspection standards.

How online Part 11-capable signing typically operates

Understanding the end-to-end flow clarifies what evidence and controls must be captured during each signing event.

  • Initiate document: Owner uploads and selects template.
  • Authenticate signer: MFA or identity verification occurs.
  • Apply signature: System records signature and field data.
  • Store evidence: Immutable logs and PDFs saved.
Collect signatures
24x
faster
Reduce costs by
$30
per document
Save up to
40h
per employee / month

Quick setup steps for a Part 11-aware signNow CRM workflow

A concise setup checklist helps teams configure system-level controls, assign roles, and prepare templates for validated document signing.

  • 01
    Map processes: Identify documents and signature points.
  • 02
    Define roles: Set role-based access and permissions.
  • 03
    Configure templates: Add controlled fields and metadata.
  • 04
    Enable logging: Turn on immutable audit trails.

Audit trail setup and verification checklist

A practical grid of steps for ensuring audit trails capture required evidence and are retained in a verifiable manner.

01

Enable logging:

Turn on comprehensive audit logs.
02

Define retention:

Set archival duration per policy.
03

Test integrity:

Perform tamper checks.
04

Document exports:

Verify PDF and CSV outputs.
05

Access review:

Audit user access regularly.
06

Snapshot configs:

Store configuration snapshots.
be ready to get more

Why choose airSlate SignNow

  • Free 7-day trial. Choose the plan you need and try it risk-free.
  • Honest pricing for full-featured plans. airSlate SignNow offers subscription plans with no overages or hidden fees at renewal.
  • Enterprise-grade security. airSlate SignNow helps you comply with global security standards.
illustrations signature

Recommended workflow configuration settings for compliant signing

Suggested default settings and configuration targets for CRM-integrated signing workflows used in regulated contexts. Adjust values to match your validation and retention policies.

Setting Name Configuration
Reminder Frequency 48 hours
Signature Authentication Method MFA required
Audit Log Export Format CSV and PDF
Document Retention Policy 7 years
Change Control Logging Enabled

Supported platforms and technical requirements

Confirming platform compatibility ensures signers and administrators can access signing workflows across devices while preserving controls required for regulated use.

  • Desktop browsers: Chrome, Edge, Safari
  • Mobile apps: iOS and Android
  • API clients: RESTful endpoints

For regulated deployments, validate browser and OS versions in your qualification protocol, require secure device configurations, and document supported client stacks and update schedules in your change-control records.

Key security controls and protections to verify

Encryption at rest: AES-256
Encryption in transit: TLS 1.2+
Access controls: Role-based
Authentication options: Multi-factor
Audit logging: Immutable logs
Data residency: US-based options

Industry examples: how compliant eSign workflows are used

Two practical scenarios illustrate differences when a CRM is paired with a Part 11-aware eSignature solution versus a general CRM workflow.

Clinical Trial Consent

A clinical site needs signed informed consent forms that must be traceable and timestamped with validated system behavior

  • Use of controlled eSignature fields and MFA protects signer identity
  • Benefit: consistent chain-of-custody for participant consent and simplified audit response

Resulting in faster inspection readiness and fewer corrective actions for consent documentation.

Vendor Approval and CAPA

A quality team documents vendor approvals and corrective actions requiring signature evidence across departments

  • Integration captures signer identity, signature timestamps, and version history in CRM records
  • Benefit: consolidated compliance artifacts for CAPA and supplier qualification processes

Leading to streamlined audits and clearer demonstrable evidence of approvals and controls.

Best practices for secure, audit-ready eSignature workflows

Adopting consistent procedures and configurations helps ensure electronic records and signatures remain defensible during audits and inspections.

Document a validation and change control plan
Maintain written validation evidence, acceptance test results, and a change-control process that demonstrates how the eSignature-enabled CRM behaves consistently over time.
Use multi-factor authentication where required
Require at least two-factor authentication for signers and privileged users to strengthen signer identity assurance and reduce the risk of unauthorized approvals.
Limit signer privileges and enforce roles
Apply the principle of least privilege so only designated roles can prepare or approve regulated documents; track role assignments in formal records.
Retain exportable, tamper-evident artifacts
Store signed PDFs, audit logs, and system configuration snapshots in a secure archive to support future inspections and evidence requests.

FAQs and troubleshooting for Part 11-capable signing workflows

Answers to common questions about deploying and operating compliant electronic signing within CRM-driven processes, including practical troubleshooting notes for verification and audit-readiness.

Side-by-side: 21 CFR Part 11 considerations for signNow, Streak, and paper

A concise comparison of key compliance criteria across a Part 11-oriented eSignature integration (signNow), a general CRM with signing features (Streak), and traditional paper-based records.

Feature or Compliance Criteria Listed signNow (Recommended) Streak CRM Paper-based
21 CFR Part 11 support Yes, configured No, not native Manual
Audit trail detail Comprehensive logs Basic events Handwritten notes
Signer authentication options MFA, ID check Email only In-person ID
Exportable compliance artifacts Signed PDFs and logs Limited exports Physical files
be ready to get more

Get legally-binding signatures now!

Retention, review, and document lifecycle considerations

Define retention periods and review cadence for signed records and configuration artifacts to remain inspection-ready and compliant with regulatory expectations.

Signed record retention period:

As-required by protocol or SOPs.

Audit log retention schedule:

Multi-year archival in secure storage.

SOP review cadence:

Annual or per-regulatory update.

Validation requalification interval:

After major changes or annually.

Document disposal procedure:

Controlled destruction per policy.

Regulatory risks and potential penalties to consider

Regulatory fines: Monetary penalties
Inspection findings: Form 483 observations
Data integrity loss: Operational impact
Product approval delays: Timeline risk
Rework costs: High remediation
Legal exposure: Contract disputes
walmart logo
exonMobil logo
apple logo
comcast logo
facebook logo
FedEx logo
be ready to get more

Get legally-binding signatures now!