eSignature
Clear requirements for electronic signature acceptance, signature types supported (typed, drawn, certificate-based), signer authentication methods, and legal enforceability under ESIGN and UETA to ensure regulatory acceptance.
Using life-sciences-specific RFP examples ensures requirements reflect regulatory workflows, patient privacy controls, and validation needs unique to clinical and manufacturing environments.
Responsible for study conduct and document workflows, this user needs RFP language that specifies eSignature ordering, delegation rules, and audit trails to ensure investigator documentation remains inspection-ready and traceable during multicenter trials.
Charged with validating vendor security posture and integration patterns, this person requires clear technical criteria for encryption, API authentication, logging, and data retention to satisfy institutional IT policies and regulatory audits.
Procurement, clinical operations, regulatory affairs, and IT teams use these examples to align technical and compliance expectations before vendor engagement.
A shared RFP template reduces back-and-forth during evaluations and supports consistent scoring across cross-functional stakeholders.
Clear requirements for electronic signature acceptance, signature types supported (typed, drawn, certificate-based), signer authentication methods, and legal enforceability under ESIGN and UETA to ensure regulatory acceptance.
Detailed audit history that captures signer identity method, timestamps, IP addresses, and document state changes, exportable in machine-readable formats for inspections and sponsor audits.
Version-controlled templates with field locking, role-based access, and bulk population features to standardize documents across sites and reduce errors during study or manufacturing workflows.
Robust REST API, webhooks, and SDKs for integration with EHR, LIMS, QMS, and clinical trial systems; include sample payloads and authentication details for accurate technical evaluation.
Explicit support for HIPAA controls, BAAs, configurable retention, and exportable logs so the solution aligns with institutional policies and regulatory requirements during audits.
Granular RBAC, SSO/SAML integration, and delegated administration to manage site-based permissions and maintain separation of duties across study teams and quality groups.
Require a documented REST API with authentication options, webhook support for event notifications, and sample payloads to demonstrate how the platform connects with EHR, LIMS, or QMS systems.
Ask for versioned templates with field locking, merge tags, and role-based template ownership to reduce errors and ensure consistent document assembly across sites and departments.
Specify the ability to send a single document to many recipients with individualized data, track deliveries, and generate consolidated status reports for site managers and study coordinators.
Request customizable reporting, CSV/XML exports of audit events, and archival exports that meet institutional retention policies and facilitate downstream analysis or audits.
| Workflow Setting Name and Configuration Header | Default Configuration |
|---|---|
| Default signing order and routing rules | Sequential |
| Reminder Frequency for All Signers | 48 hours |
| Automatic Expiration for Requests | 90 days |
| Signer Identity Verification Methods | Email + SMS |
| Document Retention and Auto-Archive | 7 years |
Specify supported operating systems, recommended browser versions, and mobile app availability to ensure broad accessibility across research and manufacturing teams.
Include minimum browser versions, network requirements, and any client-side prerequisites to reduce deployment surprises and ensure consistent user experience across sites and corporate environments.
A mid-size CRO sought a signing platform to centralize informed consent and protocol approvals with strict auditability and chain-of-custody controls.
Resulting in streamlined inspection readiness and reduced time spent reconciling signer records during sponsor audits, enabling consistent handling across 25 active study sites.
A biologics manufacturer needed a system for batch release documentation that integrates with QMS and preserves electronic records within defined retention policies.
Resulting in fewer manual transfers, improved release traceability, and demonstrable record integrity for regulators and internal quality reviews.
| Feature and Compliance Criteria Header | signNow (Recommended) | DocuSign | Adobe Sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESIGN and UETA legal enforceability | |||
| HIPAA security and privacy controls | Supported | Supported | Supported |
| Robust API availability for integrations | REST API | REST API | REST API |
| Bulk Send and Template Management | Bulk Send | Bulk Send | Bulk Send |
| Plan and feature comparison header | signNow (Recommended) | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | OneSpan Sign | Dropbox Sign |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free tier or trial availability | Free tier with limited features | Free 30-day trial available | Trial and starter plans | Trial available on request | Free trial and limited free plan |
| Typical enterprise authentication options | SSO, SAML, OAuth | SSO, SAML, OAuth | SSO, SAML, OAuth | SAML, certificate-based | SSO, SAML |
| HIPAA and regulated industry support | Available with BAA | Available with BAA | Available with BAA | Available with compliance add-on | Available with BAA |
| API and developer resources | Comprehensive REST API and SDKs | Extensive API and SDKs | Full REST API and SDKs | Enterprise APIs | Developer API and SDKs |
| Deployment and data residency options | Cloud with US data options | Cloud and private options | Cloud with enterprise controls | On-prem and cloud | Cloud with regional controls |