Scoring Matrices
Customizable multi-criteria scoring models allow quantitative comparison of proposals, enable weighting of technical versus commercial factors, and exportable results for audit and sponsor reporting.
Structured RFP management reduces procurement cycle time, clarifies evaluation criteria, and improves compliance for technical sourcing in research settings.
Leads sourcing activities for multiple R&D projects, manages vendor evaluations, and enforces procurement policies. They configure scoring models, coordinate cross-functional reviews, and ensure documentation meets audit and legal requirements while tracking budgets and timelines across initiatives.
Defines technical specifications and selects vendors for specialized equipment or contracted development. They prioritize scientific objectives, assess technical proposals for feasibility, and collaborate with procurement and legal teams to finalize scope and acceptance criteria.
Procurement, research leadership, and project managers coordinate technical sourcing and vendor selection across R&D portfolios.
Procurement teams, principal investigators, and legal reviewers use these tools to standardize reviews, document approvals, and maintain traceable records.
Customizable multi-criteria scoring models allow quantitative comparison of proposals, enable weighting of technical versus commercial factors, and exportable results for audit and sponsor reporting.
Track changes across RFP revisions and maintain an authoritative baseline to compare vendor responses against the issued specification and freeze changes during evaluation periods.
Temporarily mask pricing or confidential sections during initial technical review to minimize bias and protect sensitive commercial information until final scoring.
Structured questionnaires standardize vendor disclosures, capture compliance attestations, and simplify automated validation of minimum qualifications.
Prebuilt connectors to procurement, finance, and cloud storage systems reduce manual reconciliation and accelerate post-award purchasing workflows.
Maintained libraries of institutional templates ensure legal and procurement language consistency for different contract types and funding sources.
Custom RFP templates with technical sections, standard terms, and preformatted evaluation criteria to save time and ensure consistency across projects.
Shared reviewer access, inline comments, and version control to coordinate interdisciplinary feedback between scientists, procurement, and legal teams.
Secure submission portal enabling vendors to upload proposals, respond to clarifications, and receive status updates without email attachments or lost files.
Integrated electronic signing with audit trails and authentication options to finalize agreements in compliance with U.S. electronic signature laws.
| Setting Name | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Reminder Frequency | 48 hours |
| Approval Escalation | 3 levels |
| Signature Order | Sequential |
| Submission Deadline | Fixed closure |
| Reviewer Access | Role-based |
Ensure compatibility across desktops, tablets, and mobile devices to allow reviewers and vendors to access RFP materials conveniently.
Verify browser support, mobile app features, and API capabilities during selection; confirm the platform supports required authentication methods and encryption standards for institutional compliance.
A university research lab required specialized assay equipment and issued an RFP to multiple vendors
Resulting in awarded contracts that met technical needs and complied with institutional purchasing policies
A pharmaceutical R&D group solicited proposals for a multi-site study CRO
Leading to an executed agreement that maintained regulatory documentation and accelerated study startup
| Criteria | signNow (Recommended) | DocuSign | Adobe Sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bulk Send | |||
| API Access | REST API | REST API | REST API |
| HIPAA Support | Enterprise plan | Enterprise plan | |
| Offline Signing | Mobile offline | Mobile offline |
Public release and vendor notification
Final day for vendor clarifications
Cutoff for receiving vendor proposals
Time allocated for scoring and review
Planned date for signatures and award
| Starter Plan (per user) | Lower monthly fee for individual users | Mid-tier monthly fee for professionals | Higher monthly fee with broader features | Competitive per-user pricing for SMBs | Enterprise-negotiated pricing available |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Security Options | Includes AES-256 encryption and SSO | Enterprise add-on for advanced security | Built-in enterprise security features | SOC 2 available on select plans | Advanced compliance modules available |
| API Rate Limits | Generous API calls per minute on paid plans | Standard API quotas with paid tiers | Tiered API throughput and enterprise options | API access on paid plans | Custom API SLAs for enterprises |
| Bulk Sending Capacity | High-volume bulk send included on specific plans | Bulk send available with limits | Enterprise bulk send options | Limited batch sending on paid tiers | Bulk send via API in enterprise plans |
| Support and SLAs | Business hours support with paid SLAs | 24/7 enterprise support options | 24/7 support for enterprise customers | Email and chat support on paid plans | Premium support available contracts |
| Compliance Certifications | ESIGN, UETA compliance and SOC 2 readiness | ESIGN and SOC 2 on enterprise plans | ESIGN, SOC 2, and ISO options | ESIGN and SOC 2 options | Focus on enterprise certifications |