Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Kentucky Judicial Redistricting Plan

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

UNIFORM CHILD SUPPORT ORDER AND/OR WAGE/INCOME WITHHOLDING ORDER

AOC-152

Rev. 4-13

Page 1 of 2

Commonwealth of Kentucky

Court of Justice www.courts.ky.gov

Doc Code: OSUP

OSUPW

Case No.

Court

District

Circuit

Family

County

IV-D Case No.

NEW ORDER AMENDED ORDER ORDER FOR WAGE/INCOME WITHHOLDING

* See Footnotes & Additional Information

NOTICE: The Federal Income Withholding For Support Form OMB 0970-0154 must be used by private parties or their attorneys in non-IV-D eligible cases to notify an employer/income withholder of any wage/income withholding ordered herein.

Plaintiff/Petitioner Name

Birthdate

SSN

Defendant/Respondent Name

Birthdate

SSN

In Re: Child's Name

Social Security No. Birthdate

Child's Name

Social Security No. Birthdate

If there are more than two (2) children, attach separate sheet with identifying information and check here Said attachment is incorporated into this Order by reference.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: The Mother Father Other

shall pay child support as follows:

1) $ per month as current child support effective

As determined by KY Child Support Guidelines;

By written agreement of parties with knowledge of the Guidelines;

Upon a finding that application of the Guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate because:

2) $ per month toward arrearage judgment totaling $ calculated for period beginning and ending

3) Health insurance is currently accessible and reasonable in cost. The Mother Father is ordered to provide and maintain health insurance coverage for the minor child(ren).

Health insurance is not currently accessible and reasonable in cost but shall be provided by the Mother Father when it becomes accessible and reasonable in cost. Extraordinary medical expenses shall be paid as follows:

4) $ per month for other expenses:

5) $ TOTAL MONTHLY AMOUNT to be paid at: 1 $ per week bi-weekly semi-monthly month

6) Other conditions:

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

PROTECTIVE ORDER

ISSUED [ ] YES [ ] NO

PROTECTED PARTY:

PETITIONER

RESPONDENT

Child Support Recipient's Name & Address 2 -

1 If child support is paid by wage withholding, a job change may affect the frequency and amount of wages to be withheld in order to meet the monthly obligation amount.

2 Child support recipient may elect not to provide address information in this section but in order to be properly disbursed his/her mailing address must be provided to the child support agency.

CHILD SUPPORT SHALL CONTINUE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT UNLESS MODIFIED BY THE COURT, OR ENDED BY OPERATION OF LAW.

7) Check only box A, B, or C as appropriate and any applicable options therein.

A. Child support ordered herein shall be subject to wage/income withholding on the effective date of this Order, to begin immediately. 3 The employee is responsible for making payments to recipient: (check one)

directly, OR through until such time as child support is withheld from the employee's paycheck. This Order shall apply to any subsequent employer.

OR

B. One party has demonstrated and the Court hereby finds that there is good cause not to require immediate wage/income withholding. Child support shall be paid as follows: (check one)

Mailed directly to: Kentucky Child Support Enforcement at Centralized Collection Unit P.O. Box 14059, Lexington, KY 40512-4059

OR

Other:

Wage/Income withholding shall take effect when an arrearage accrues that is equal to the amount of support payable for one month without the need for a judicial or administrative hearing. If wage/income withholding becomes applicable, see footnotes 3, 4, and 5 below relating to the mandatory federal income withholding form.

OR

C. The Court has made a finding that both parties have reached a written agreement which provides for an alternative arrangement to wage/income withholding as follows:

3 Effective June 1, 2012, the Federal Income Withholding For Support Form OMB 0970-0154 must be used by private parties or their attorneys in non-IV-D eligible cases to notify an employer/income withholder of any wage/income withholding ordered herein.

4 All child support payments made pursuant to a wage/income withholding order shall be directed to the State Disbursement Unit at: Kentucky Child Support Enforcement at Centralized Collection Unit, P.O. Box 14059, Lexington, KY 40512-4059.

5 Requesting party must mail Form OMB 0970-0154 and a copy of this Order, AOC-152, by certified mail to the employer within 2 working days.

Notice. Obligor: Interest may be charged on any delinquent child support payments. KRS 360.040 and 405.467(2).

DOCUMENT PREPARER:

Address:

Phone No.

***FOR PRIVATE NON-IV-D ELIGIBLE CASES, PREPARER MUST SEND COPY OF THIS ORDER TO:

KENTUCKY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, NIVD UNIT, P.O. BOX 2150, FRANKFORT, KY 40602 FAX: (502) 564-7938

This order reflects statutory provisions of KRS 403.211-.212, 405.467, 360.040, 405.465, 205.710, 205.712, 403.215, 403.750, and 610.170, the provisions of FCRPP 9, and section 466 of the Social Security Act.

Date:

Judge

Distribution: Court File - Original. CHFS (place in Contracting Official's basket). Petitioner. Respondent.

Enter text

What the Kentucky Judicial Redistricting Plan Is

The Kentucky Judicial Redistricting Plan is the formal document used to define judicial district boundaries within Kentucky for trial and appellate courts. It explains proposed boundary changes, includes maps and demographic data, and records statutory authority, public input, and the rationale for adjustments. The plan supports statutory compliance, transparency, and review by the legislature, judiciary, and affected stakeholders. Jurisdictions may update plans after decennial census data or as required by state law; competing plans can prompt judicial review or administrative revision depending on local rules.

Why a Clear Judicial Redistricting Plan Matters

A well-prepared Kentucky Judicial Redistricting Plan documents legal authority, preserves community representation, and reduces litigation risk. Clear maps and demographic tables help reviewers assess equal protection and statutory compliance, while a documented public comment process supports procedural fairness and transparency.

Why a Clear Judicial Redistricting Plan Matters

Who Reviews or Uses a Judicial Redistricting Plan

Each group uses the document differently: legal review, operational implementation, or public communication; coordinate early to avoid rework.

  • State judiciary administrators and court clerks who verify legal descriptions and administer changes to case assignment.
  • State legislators and legislative staff who consider statutory compliance and constituent impact during review.
  • County election officials and local government planners who update voter rolls, assignment tables, and public notices.

Essential Data Elements to Include

Plan Title: Formal plan name
Effective Date: MM/DD/YYYY
Authority: Statute or order cited
Boundary Maps: GIS shapefiles noted
Population Data: Census table references
Public Comments: Summary and transcripts

Step-by-Step: Preparing the Plan

Follow this sequence to assemble a compliant Kentucky Judicial Redistricting Plan and prepare it for review and filing.

  • 01
    Collect Data: Compile census and local demographic datasets.
  • 02
    Draft Maps: Produce GIS maps and legal descriptions.
  • 03
    Solicit Input: Publish draft and hold public hearings.
  • 04
    Finalize Filing: Prepare final text, attachments, and submission package.

Customizing an Online Submission Workflow

Configure an online workflow to collect signatures, attachments, and reviewer approvals in a single, auditable sequence.

Field Configuration
Document Uploads Require map and census attachments
Signature Order Specify signers and sequence
Reviewer Roles Assign read or approve permissions
Notifications Email alerts for pending actions

Where to File and How Submission Works

Typical routing steps for a judicial redistricting plan include internal approval, public posting, filing with the designated state office, and judicial or legislative review.

  • Local Approval: Draft approved by committee or court staff.
  • Public Posting: Publish draft for comment and hearings.
  • State Filing: Submit final plan to the official state repository.
  • Review & Certification: Await statutory review, certification, or court determination.

Digital Submission and eSignature Considerations

Ensure the chosen system retains audit logs and reproduces signed records to meet legal and archival obligations.

  • File Formats: PDF, DOCX, GeoJSON, SHP supported
  • Authentication: Email, SMS code, or stronger
  • Integrations: Supports cloud and GIS integrations

Timelines and Timing to Watch

Key timeline items include data receipt, public comment windows, internal approval schedules, and any statutory deadlines that trigger judicial or legislative action.

Census & Data Release:

Receive authoritative census inputs before drafting maps

Public Comment Period:

Open for a statutorily specified number of days

Internal Approval:

Committee or court sign-off deadlines apply

State Filing Deadline:

Varies by statute or administrative rule

Judicial Review Timeline:

Court scheduling may extend resolution time

Key Milestones from Draft to Implementation

Follow a milestone sequence to coordinate public processes, data verification, and final adoption while preserving an auditable record.

01

Data Receipt

Confirm census and local datasets for accuracy.

02

Draft Publication

Publish draft maps and invite public comment.

03

Adoption Vote

Governing body or court approves the final plan.

04

Implementation

Update assignments, notify affected offices, and archive records.

Common Preparation Mistakes to Avoid

  • Using outdated census identifiers or mismatched GIS layers that create technical incompatibilities during review.
  • Failing to record or summarize public comments, which weakens procedural transparency and increases litigation risk.
  • Omitting statutory citations or legal authority, causing administrative rejection or delay in acceptance.
  • Neglecting to include final signed attestations and dates, leading to return-for-completion by the filing office.

Consequences of an Incomplete or Incorrect Plan

Administrative Delay: Filing returned for correction
Legal Challenge: Risk of court review or injunction
Operational Disruption: Court schedules and assignments affected
Reputational Harm: Public distrust and scrutiny
Additional Costs: Attorney and re-publication fees
Nullification: Adoption may be set aside

Who Is Authorized to Sign

Chief Court Administrator

The chief court administrator or an authorized court officer typically signs to attest accuracy and adoption; signature confirms legal authority and triggers filing or publication steps.

Legislative Clerk or Official

When legislative approval is required, the clerk or designated legislative officer signs the certified plan to verify the recorded vote and statutory compliance.

Practical Examples of Plan Use

Two concise scenarios illustrate how a judicial redistricting plan moves from draft to operational use.

County Implementation

A county drafts boundary changes to balance caseloads

  • public hearings gather local input
  • final plan adopted, filed with state archives, and court calendars adjusted to reflect new assignments.

Court-Led Revision

A state court directs redistricting to address workload imbalances

  • the judiciary provides technical maps and data
  • plan published, stakeholders notified, and implementation staged over the next term.

Practical Tips for Accurate and Efficient Completion

Follow these best practices to reduce errors, speed approval, and create a defensible public record.

Use Authoritative Data Sources
Rely on official Census Bureau identifiers and current state GIS layers to prevent mismatches that delay technical validation and public scrutiny.
Document Public Input Clearly
Keep organized transcripts, attendance lists, and summary tables of comments to demonstrate procedural fairness and counter potential procedural objections.
Standardize File Names and Formats
Adopt a consistent naming convention and preferred file formats (PDF for signed records, GeoJSON or shapefiles for maps) to streamline reviewer workflows.
Validate Signatures and Dates
Confirm authorized signers, include printed names and titles, and verify dates to prevent administrative rejections or legal challenges.

eSignature Vendor Comparison for Plan Execution and Filing

Platform selection affects authentication, audit trails, and integration with document repositories; compare core capabilities and pricing to match your filing needs.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial, no credit card No No Yes, limited Yes, limited
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to common questions about preparing, validating, and submitting a Kentucky Judicial Redistricting Plan.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users