Fill and Sign the Manulife Claim Form Gl3803blh

Earmark Grants Elizabeth Nicholson, Federal Project Officer Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Regional Training Forum • • • • • Meet with your FPO Learn more about DOL grant requirements Provide you with guidance and technical assistance for grant management and operations Network with other Earmark Grantees Take back ideas to make your grant program even better! Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Getting to Know You Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 What would you like to get out of this session? Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Earmark Grants in Region 3 - 2010 20 Earmark Grants 4 AL– 1 FL – 6 GA - 1 KY – 4 MS – 7 NC – 1 1 7 1 1 6 Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Earmark Grants in Region 3 - 2009 19 Earmark Grants 1 AL– 2 FL – 6 KY – 1 MS – 6 SC – 3 TN - 1 1 3 6 2 6 Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Earmark Grants in Region 3 • • • • • • 2000 – 2 2001 – 11 2002 – 12 2003 – 16 2004 – 13 2005 – 24 • • • • • 2006 – 0 2007 – 0 2008 – 12 2009 – 19 2010 – 20 Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Role of Federal Project Officer (FPO) • • • • • Main point of contact Conduit for all formal Grantee-ETA communications Advises & assists on paperwork sufficiency Technical Assistance – directs grantee to resources available Oversight – monitors your grant(s) & reviews quarterly reporting Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Philadelphia Earmark Center (PEC) • • • • National Program Office for Earmarks Reviews proposals submitted through Regional office Resolves issues regarding “legality” or allowable activities Provides policy guidance and technical assistance Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Where do the Funds Come From? • • • Directed by Congress to fund certain workforce development projects and initiatives Appropriated under the annual Fiscal Year Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Act Authorized under Section 171, Pilot, Demonstration & Research Projects, of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 The main difference between earmark grants and other ETA grants is that earmark grants are awarded without the usual competition among eligible grantee organizations. Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 A major WIA requirement for grantees, both competitive and noncompetitive, is the submission of an acceptable written proposal that outlines how requested Federal funding would be used. Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Only after a proposal is received, reviewed, and approved by the National Grant Officer does an organization become an official ETA grantee benefiting from a Federal grant. ETA proposals must meet the standards of both WIA and OMB regulations. Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Earmark grant proposals should include: • • • • • Provision for direct services to individuals Evidence of coordination with the local workforce delivery system Quantified Performance Outcomes An Evaluation Component Detailed & itemized budget Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Submit a grant proposal that complies with: • • • • • • Conference Report WIA Section 171 – P, D, & R Projects WIA Section 181 – Req. & Restrictions OMB Rules and Regulations Reference Book One: The Essential Guide for Writing an Earmark Grant Proposal Reference Book Two: A Guide to Financial & Grant Management Requirements for Earmark Grants Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 What is the Process for Receiving the Grant Award? Grant Proposal Submission Grant Proposal Review Federal Project Officer Regional Management Philadelphia Earmark Center National Office Grant Officer Grant Officer Approval Congressional Notification Award Disseminated to Grantee Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Factors that Delay Award process: • • • • • • Unallowable activities/unallowable costs Inconsistencies with timeline and Period of Performance (POP) Start date should be at least 60 to 90 days from FINAL proposal submission Vague outcomes Incorrect amount of total award amount Incorrect budget calculations Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Factors that Delay Award process: • • • • • Charges exceeding salary limitation Incorrect use of indirect costs vs. administrative costs Incorrect DUNs # on SF-424 Legal Name of Applicant on SF-424 inconsistent with conference report Missing original signature of authorized representative Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Resource materials available at: http://www.doleta.gov/regions/Reg02/Pages/Pecoe.cfm Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Resource materials: Earmark Conference Reference Materials Reference Book One Reference Book Two Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) Grant Budget Worksheets (SF-424A) Earmark Proposal Template Earmark Final Report Template Earmark Grant Post-Award Guide Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Topics for Discussion Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Topics for Discussion: Successes / Best Practices Challenges Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Topics for Discussion: Modifications - Equipment Purchases Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Topics for Discussion: Quarterly Reports Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 EARMARK GRANT QUARTERLY NARRATIVE REPORT 1. GENERAL GRANT INFORMATION Grantee Name: Project Name: Grant Number: Quarterly Report Period: Name of Person Submitting Report: Phone: 2. GRANT GOALS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS Work Plan/Time Schedule/Deliverables: Insert the work plan from the grant and provide an update on the status of each identified task/objective OBJECTIVES TASKS YEAR I YEAR II 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 HOW MEASURED STATUS Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 3. PERFORMANCE MEASURES Provide the following information for all performance measures identified in the grant. Name of Performance Measure Expected Level of Performance Accomplishm ents To-Date 4. VARIANCE FROM PLAN AND CORRECTIVE ACTION If performance has varied from plan, state the reasons for the variance and corrective action taken or planned to address the variance. Please note that some variances such as significant changes to the statement of work, staffing or budget line items may require a modification to the grant. Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 5. TECHNICAL ASSISTAN CE NEEDS Discuss any assistance needed to address performance issues. 6. OTHER COMMENTS (Optional) Describe any best practices and any success stories, articles, awards, public announcements, or other news about the project. If available, please attach with your report. Add any comments, if you wish. Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Topics for Discussion: Monitoring Review Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Topics for Discussion: Sustainability Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Topics for Discussion: Final Report Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Topics for Discussion: Close out Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011 Questions? Region 3 Discretionary Grants Training Forum 2011