Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Periodic Diligence Memorandum

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

5.04 Periodic Diligence Memorandum

In reviewing and utilizing the following form, the Diligence Attorney should keep in mind that periodic memoranda are an important component of the materials that will be utilized in preparing client-oriented executive summaries.

ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE

ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT

CONFIDENTIAL

SAMPLE PERIODIC DILIGENCE MEMORANDUM

TO:

FROM:

DATE:

RE:

In connection with our due diligence investigation in connection with Project X of (the "Company") in the context of the current (the "Transaction"), I have prepared for your review the following due diligence memorandum which: (i) summarizes the efforts of the diligence team to date, (ii) describes our significant findings, and (iii) highlights potential trouble spots. For your convenience I have organized the items listed herein in descending order of importance or concern. Once you have had an opportunity to review this memorandum please contact me so that we may discuss and refine our due diligence efforts from this point forward.

I. GENERAL

A. Environmental Matters.

In view of the prominence given to environmental matters in the minutes of the Board of Directors and in the minutes of the Executive Committee, it will be important to engage in a more detailed analysis of the Company's environmental affairs. A number of factors, such as the Company's use of toxic chemicals in its manufacturing processes and its by-product production of other toxic substances, suggest that at least a Phase I environmental audit be performed in connection with the Transaction. In light of the potential costs of any environmental clean up and the time required to complete even a Phase I environmental audit, I think this issue requires your immediate attention.

B. Questionable Payments to Foreign Persons.

Based on a review of the Company's minute books and other records, it appears that in the last two years the Company has made several payments in excess of U.S. $1 million to persons resident in Spain and Portugal in connection with the Company's sales of products to the governments of those countries. Obviously, we need full details regarding these payments and will need to satisfy ourselves that such payments were not in violation of U.S., Spanish or Portuguese law.

C. Toxicity and Mutagenicity.

The Executive Committee gave serious consideration to establishing a program for testing certain of the Company's products for the presence of carcinogens. The Executive Committee also considered procedures to inform various persons of findings of an unusually high incidence of cancer among its manufacturing employees at its Ohio facility. This matter should be reviewed in greater depth. I have scheduled a meeting with our environmental specialist tomorrow and will speak with Cathy Crow, our toxic tort expert, on Wednesday.

D. Long-Term Sale and/or Supply Contracts.

The Company has entered into at least six long-term contracts for the supply of various raw materials used in manufacturing. The contracts are with major suppliers such as CCC Chemical. All of these contracts expire within the next six months. The negative financial and other effects of the expiration of these contracts (which the Company describes as "favorable") is subject to a lengthy disclosure in this year's 10-K.

E. Reductions at Subsidiary.

For the last two years the Company has pursued a vigorous policy of downsizing operations in certain product lines through asset sales, reduced capital expenditures, etc. Three facilities were sold last year and one during the preceding year for a total cash consideration of approximately U.S. $250 million. The implications of this winding down of certain operations on the financial prospects of the Company should be analyzed.

F. Resistance to Inflationary Accounting.

Several letters to management from the company's independent auditors indicate hesitation on the part of some Company subsidiaries to adopt inflationary LIFO accounting methods. Although I do not at present fully appreciate the implications of this, I will meet tomorrow with our client's chief financial officer to explore the issue. Last year's auditor's letter to management has not yet been prepared. I will discuss the expected completion date with the company's auditor on Thursday.

G. Debt Instruments.

The Company is party to two indentures and one revolving credit agreement. Each of these contains various restrictive covenants which affect the Company. Only two of these provisions, however, appear material in the context of the Transaction-the Restricted Payments covenant, which prohibits the Company from paying dividends and the Limitation on Additional Debt, which limits new debt incurrence to U.S. $50 million. I will review these provisions with our Financial Services team member tomorrow after which I will be prepared to discuss this topic further.

H. Employee Plans and Employment Agreements.

The Company is party to an employment agreement with Robert Robbins, its president. The contract is extremely long-term (10 years with two 10 year renewal periods) and generous (salary of U.S. $1.0 million per year escalated for inflation, plus deferred compensation and significant benefits). In the event of a change of control, Mr. Robbins is entitled to terminate his employment and receive a lump sum payment equal to five years' salary.

The Company maintains a Defined Benefit Plan for salaried employees, a Defined Contribution Plan (401K) for all employees and various other benefit plans such as Life and Disability Insurance and Tuition Sharing Programs. According to the most recent Actuarial Report prepared by Kendall & Kendall, the Defined Benefit Plan is underfunded by U.S. $5 million. I have asked our ERISA specialist to review the Plan documents and meet with me tomorrow afternoon to discuss any other problems.

Additionally, based on a review of the Collective Bargaining Agreements for the Company's manufacturing facilities, it appears that the Company is required to make contributions to a Worker's Multi-Employer Plan. There was no mention of this Plan in the benefits section of the Data Room, but it is referenced in the Union Contract. I will telephone the Company's human resources manager on Friday to resolve the discrepancy and, if appropriate, to secure copies of the Multi-Employer Plan documents. (See Labor Contract, infra.)

I. Labor Contract.

The Company's employees are not generally unionized. However, the manufacturing employees are represented by the local Workers unions. The Company is party to contracts with each of these unions. Each of the contracts, which must be assumed in any transfer of ownership such as that contemplated by the Transaction, expires next month and contains provisions for multi-employer plan contributions. (See Employee Plans, supra.)

J. Litigation.

The Data Room contains no information on litigation. The Notes to Financials and the 10-Ks for each of the last three years note that the Company is party to various lawsuits, both as plaintiff and defendant, but that none of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, is material.

II. SIGNIFICANT ACTIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY

June 1, 20__-Approval of Chairman's recommendation to withdraw from the residential (as opposed to commercial office) business and to shut down related facilities at Plant A.

June 8, 20__-Approval of a licensing arrangement giving Company exclusive right to manufacture and sell Inventor Corp's patented product subject to regulatory approval.

July 20, 20__-Approval of the issuance of three-year subordinated notes in the amount of $50 million primarily to finance the company's expansion into the other businesses.

July 27, 20__-Approval of six-year supply contract with CCC Chemical to supply up to 154,000 gallons of raw materials per year to Plant A and Plant B.

August 10, 20__-Approval of employment contract with Dan Dinkins.

August 17, 20__-Approval of consent agreement with the State of Pennsylvania regarding remediation of ground water contamination at Plant C.

December 14, 20__-Approval of final consent decree with the Federal Trade Commission regarding alleged dealer discrimination in connection with the Company's operations.

December 28, 20__-Approval of Agreement with RRR, Inc. to purchase all of the assets of its manufacturing company for $50 million and certain warrants to purchase Class A common stock of the Company.

March 22, 20__-Approval of procedures with respect to handling of possible layoffs of salaried employees in the Company's operations.

April 12, 20__-Approval of the settlement agreement between Company and Industrial Industries with respect to an interference with contract.

November 8, 20__-Approval of a letter of intent to be submitted to Industria, S.p.A. to enter into a 50/50 joint venture for the development and marketing of products throughout Western Europe.

January 31, 20__-Recommendation to the Board of Directors that $10 million of PIDA (Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority) Bonds be issued to fund the expansion of the Company's manufacturing facility in Pennsylvania.

February 28, 20__-Approval of closing of plant in Canada.

III. SIGNIFICANT ACTIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY

From June 20__ to January 20__, the Executive Committee was composed of as many as ten members. Following January 20__, the committee was renamed "Office of the Chairman" and was composed of three members, Messrs. Timmon, Rogers and Little. On January 1, 20__, the committee was renamed "Executive Committee," but its composition remained the same. At the beginning of the period under review, the committee was responsible for many pricing decisions, approval of capital budgeting programs, and day-to-day review of business matters. Pricing is no longer an important function of the committee.

June 1, 20__-Approval of Chairman's recommendation to withdraw from the residential (as opposed to commercial office) business and to shut down related facilities at Plant A.

June 8, 20__-Approval of a licensing arrangement giving Company exclusive right to manufacture and sell Inventor Corp.'s patented product subject to regulatory approval.

July 20, 20__-Approval of the issuance of three-year subordinated notes in the amount of $50 million primarily to finance the Company's expansion into other businesses.

July 27, 20__-Approval of six-year supply contract with CCC Chemical to supply up to 154,000 gallons of material per year to Plants A and B.

August 10, 20__-Approval of employment contract with Dan Dinkins.

August 17, 20__-Approval of consent agreement with the State of Pennsylvania regarding remediation of ground water contamination at Plant C.

December 14, 20__-Approval of final consent decree with the Federal Trade Commission regarding alleged dealer discrimination in connection with the Company's operations.

December 28, 20__-Approval of agreement with RRR, Inc. to purchase all of the assets of its manufacturing company for $50 million and certain warrants to purchase Class A common stock of the Company.

March 22, 20__-Approval of procedures with respect to handling of possible layoffs of salaried employees in the Company's operations.

April 12, 20__-Approval of the settlement agreement between Company and Industrial Industries with respect to an interference with contract.

November 8, 20__-Approval of a letter of intent to be submitted to Industria, S.p.A. to enter into a 50/50 joint venture for the development and marketing of products throughout Western Europe.

January 31, 20__-Recommendation to the Board of Directors that $10 million of PIDA (Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority) Bonds be issued to fund the expansion of the Company's manufacturing facility in Pennsylvania.

February 28, 20__-Approval of closing of plant in Canada.

IV. SIGNIFICANT ACTIONS OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY

September 18, 20__-Recommendation to the Office of the Chairman of an increase in the level of commercial paper borrowing from $50 million to $75 million.

January 29, 20__-Authorization, through resolution by unanimous consent, of the borrowing from Bankers Bank of 5,000,000 Belgian Francs by German Sub, A.G., the Company's German subsidiary, such borrowing to be guaranteed by Company.

March 11, 20__-Authorization, at a special meeting, of the exchange agreement and plan of reorganization between Company and Financial Corp., providing for the right of Financial Corp. to deliver to the Company up to $5 million principal amount of 10-3/8% senior subordinated debentures in exchange for 500,000 shares of Class B common stock.

October 19, 20__-Recommendation to the Board of an increase in the authorized level of commercial paper borrowings from $75 million to $100 million.

February 8, 20__-Recommendation to the Board for the issuance of subordinated debt in an amount of up to $50 million to finance certain foreign projects.

V. SIGNIFICANT ACTIONS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY

October 17, 20__-Review of draft report of the Secretary to the Committee concerning improper payments in Portugal (including discussion on the risk to the Company, the adequacy of the review performed in 20__ by the audit committee and by the independent auditor, and the risk of personal liability to directors).

July 17, 20__-Discussion of the 20__ letter of independent auditors to management. No action taken.

October 16, 20__-Review of advisability of adopting LIFO method of inventory accounting. Recommendation made to Board to adopt same.

February 5, 20__-Review of questionable payments in Middle East and decision that the incident did not merit disclosure or further action at this time.

October 30, 20__-Review with independent auditors to consider whether the increasing illiquidity of the Company's South African investments required any special treatment in the financial statements. All parties agreed that disclosure was required.

August 17, 20__-Review of the embezzlement investigation in the Company's Plant D. A recommendation was made to the Board that a private investigator be retained.

VI. LETTERS TO MANAGEMENT INTERNAL AUDITING CONTROLS FROM ABC ACCOUNTANTS

Copies of the letters to Company's management on internal auditing controls from ABC Accountants, Company's independent auditors, are set in my office. Following is a brief summary of the more salient points contained therein.

20__ Letter-Disproportionately increased inventories in manufacturing division; failure to comply with European requirement to hold stockholders' meeting.

20__ Letter-Problems with current FIFO accounting practices; European problem payments.

20__ Letter-Implications of adoption of LIFO; efficacy of data processing.

20__ Letter-The Company should consider hiring an internal audit manager who would oversee and verify the financial reporting of the company's subsidiaries and divisions.

Signature:

Date:

Enter text✕

What a Periodic Diligence Memorandum Is and When It’s Used

A Periodic Diligence Memorandum documents the recurring review of a counterparty, vendor, borrower, or portfolio of relationships to confirm ongoing compliance, risk posture, and material changes. It summarizes the scope of review, sources checked (contracts, AML/KYC, performance metrics, adverse media, regulatory filings), key findings, and recommended actions. Organizations use the memorandum to support audit trails, board reporting, regulatory examinations, and remediation tracking. The memo is usually dated, signed by the reviewer, and stored with supporting evidence to demonstrate a defensible periodic review process for compliance and governance purposes.

Why maintaining a Periodic Diligence Memorandum matters

A clear memorandum creates an auditable record showing that periodic reviews occurred, what was examined, and what follow-up was needed. It supports regulatory compliance, reduces legal and financial exposure, and ensures decision-makers have consistent, documented inputs when assessing continued engagement.

Why maintaining a Periodic Diligence Memorandum matters

Who prepares and relies on a Periodic Diligence Memorandum

Recipients usually include senior management, internal audit, and external examiners who require an auditable summary of periodic diligence activity.

  • Compliance teams and officers responsible for AML, sanctions screening, and regulatory reporting
  • Procurement or vendor management teams tracking contract performance and service-level compliance
  • Legal or in-house counsel assessing contractual risk, indemnities, and termination triggers

Core sections to include in a professional Periodic Diligence Memorandum

Structure the memorandum consistently so readers can find scope, findings, risk ratings, and remediation plans quickly.

Executive Summary

Short overview of scope and top-level conclusions, including overall risk rating and any immediate actions required to protect the organization.

Scope & Sources

List documents and checks performed (contracts, license verification, AML/KYC, financial statements, audits, media searches) and the review period covered.

Findings

Itemized positive and negative findings with reference to supporting documents, dates, and persons responsible for discovery.

Risk Assessment

Quantified or categorized risk levels (e.g., low/medium/high) with rationale and materiality thresholds tied to policy criteria.

Recommended Actions

Specific remediation steps, responsible owners, and target completion dates to address each material issue identified.

Signoff & Retention

Reviewer name, title, signature block, and instructions for retention and evidence attachment to maintain audit readiness.

Essential information to capture

Entity Name: Legal entity name on record
Review Date: MM/DD/YYYY of memorandum
Reviewer: Name and role of reviewer
Risk Rating: Low, medium, or high
Source List: Documents and checks used
Action Owner: Assigned remediation owner

Step-by-step: completing a Periodic Diligence Memorandum

Follow a consistent sequence to ensure thoroughness and defensibility for each periodic review.

  • 01
    Collect Records: Gather contracts, KYC, financials, audit reports.
  • 02
    Run Checks: Perform sanctions, adverse media, and license checks.
  • 03
    Document Findings: Record each finding with reference files.
  • 04
    Assign Actions: Set owners, deadlines, and track completion.

Configuring an online review workflow

Set up a digital template and routing rules so each review follows the same process and evidence is captured automatically.

Field Configuration
Template Fields Standardized fields for scope, findings, and signoff
Routing Sequence reviewers, approvers, and legal
Attachments Allow upload of PDF/Word and evidence
Notifications Email or SMS reminders to owners

Where to file or send the completed memorandum

Designate centralized storage and distribution to preserve auditability and ensure stakeholders receive timely copies.

  • Record Repository: Store signed memo in records management system
  • Compliance Folder: Attach evidence in compliance archive
  • Owner Distribution: Notify remediation owners of assigned tasks
  • Audit Access: Provide read-only access to auditors

Technical considerations for electronic completion and sharing

Ensure the selected solution meets your organization’s compliance needs, preserves metadata, and retains verifiable audit logs for regulatory review.

  • File formats: PDF and DOCX supported
  • Integration: Connects to CRM or GRC
  • Authentication: Supports MFA and SSO

Typical timelines and how frequently to issue the memorandum

Frequency should match risk profile: higher-risk relationships require more frequent reviews and shorter remediation SLAs.

High-risk counterparties:

Quarterly or more frequent reviews

Medium-risk counterparties:

Semi-annual reviews

Low-risk counterparties:

Annual reviews

Remediation SLAs:

30–90 days depending on severity

Documentation retention:

Retain signed memo per policy and law

Common mistakes to avoid when preparing the memorandum

  • Failing to attach supporting evidence, which undermines the memo’s value during audits and investigations
  • Using vague risk ratings without documented criteria or quantitative thresholds for auditability
  • Not tracking remediation ownership or deadlines, causing open issues to be forgotten or unresolved
  • Inconsistent scope across reviews, preventing reliable trend analysis and effective risk comparison

Risks and potential consequences of an inadequate memorandum

Regulatory Exposure: Fines and enforcement actions
Contract Risk: Loss of termination rights
Operational Loss: Service disruption or fraud
Reputational Harm: Public disclosures or adverse media
Audit Findings: Repeat findings and remediation orders
Legal Liability: Potential indemnity claims

Typical eSignature vendor pricing and capabilities relevant to memorandum execution

Comparing common features helps select a platform that supports secure signatures, audit trails, and required compliance controls for periodic diligence.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial Yes, 7-day free trial No No Yes, limited Yes, limited
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No

Real-world examples of periodic diligence in practice

Two condensed examples show how organizations document recurring reviews and use the memorandum for audit and remediation tracking.

Optica Ventures — Operational Review

The team standardized reviews across portfolio companies to ensure consistent criteria and evidence collection.

  • The interface and template simplified repeat reviews.
  • As COO Brian Fitzgibbons noted, adopting a standard memorandum improved consistency and made it easier to present findings to investors and auditors while reducing reviewer time per file.

Fertility Centers of Illinois — Compliance Audit

Clinical vendor checks were formalized into the memorandum with HIPAA evidence attachments.

  • Reviewers included privacy officers and legal counsel.
  • John Butler reported that the structured memorandum and attached audit trail simplified regulatory responses and kept remediation timelines visible across departments.

Typical signatories and approvers for the memorandum

Compliance Officer

A compliance officer signs to confirm the review met policy standards and that all required checks were completed; this signature supports regulatory examinations and internal audit findings.

In-House Counsel

Legal review and signoff may be required for high-risk findings or contract disputes; counsel’s signature documents legal assessment and recommended contractual actions.

FAQs and troubleshooting for Periodic Diligence Memoranda

Common questions address legal validity, eSignature use, retention requirements, and how to correct or update completed memoranda.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users