Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Wisconsin Public Defender Response Order Concerning Recoupment

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Public Defender Response / Order Concerning Recoupment

For Official Use

STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY

IN THE INTEREST OF

Name

Public Defender Response/
Order Concerning Recoupment

Date of Birth

Case No.

PUBLIC DEFENDER RESPONSE

1. The child/juvenile was provided legal services through the Office of the State Public Defender, either as appointed or staff counsel. The court has ordered the parent(s) of this person to reimburse the State of Wisconsin for the cost of those services in the total amount of $ . The court ordered this sum to be paid:

jointly by parents.

totally by one parent: father. mother.

split between the parents as follows: father: $ mother: $

2. The following parent has requested an indigency review:

father: (name)

mother: (name)

this is an intact family; both parents (named above) have jointly requested review.

3. The Public Defender reviewed the ability of the requesting person(s) to pay the sums ordered and reports to the court that:

a. The parent(s) requesting review is indigent. That parent has no obligation for reimbursement and the original Order for Recoupment should be amended.

b. The parent(s) requesting review is partially indigent. The original Order for Recoupment of Costs and Legal Services should be amended to indicate that the parent(s) is able to pay $ .

c. The parent(s) requesting review is not indigent. The original Order for Recoupment of Costs of Legal Services should not be modified.

d. The parent(s) request was untimely. The original Order for Recoupment of Costs of Legal Services should not be modified.

Signature

Title

Date

AMENDED REIMBURSEMENT ORDER

Based on the response of the State Public Defender, IT IS ORDERED:

1a. The parent(s) requesting review is indigent. The original Order for Recoupment, as it affects the parent(s) requesting review, is amended to provide that there is no obligation by that parent(s) to reimburse the State of Wisconsin.

1b. The parent(s) requesting review is partially indigent. The original Order for Recoupment of Costs of Legal Services, is amended to provide that the obligation by that parent(s) is the amount indicated in 3b above.

1c. The parent(s) requesting review is not indigent. The original Order for Recoupment of Costs of Legal Services, as it affects the parent(s) requesting review, shall remain in effect, including the payment schedule.

2. Any failure by the parent(s) to comply with this order shall subject that party to penalties for contempt of court, including incarceration in the county jail for up to 6 months, forfeitures of up to $2,000 per day for each day of noncompliance and any other order necessary to ensure compliance with this order.

BY THE COURT:

Signature of Circuit Judge

Name Printed or Typed

Date

Distribution:

1. Original – Court

2. Parent(s) requesting Review

3. State Public Defender

JD-1763, 11/99 Public Defender Response/Order Concerning Recoupment §§48.275 and 938.275(2), Wisconsin Statutes

This form shall not be modified. It may be supplemented with additional material.

Enter text✕

What the Wisconsin Public Defender Response Order Concerning Recoupment Is

The Wisconsin Public Defender Response Order Concerning Recoupment is a formal court document used in circuit court proceedings when a governmental party or the court seeks repayment of public defender fees or related costs from a defendant. The response order records the public defender's official position, any objections, factual corrections, and recommended disposition regarding recoupment. It establishes the administrative and procedural record needed for the court to decide whether to require repayment, modify amounts, or deny recoupment entirely. The form helps ensure consistent case tracking and clear service on all parties.

Why a Clear Response Order Matters in Recoupment Cases

A precise response order protects client rights, preserves appellate records, and documents the public defender office's legal and factual objections to recoupment. It reduces ambiguity for the court, clarifies financial calculations, and helps the court reach a fair resolution while maintaining procedural compliance.

Why a Clear Response Order Matters in Recoupment Cases

Who Completes and Relies on This Response Order

Several parties prepare, review, or act on the response order depending on their role in the case.

  • Public defender attorneys and paralegals who must document objections and factual records for the court.
  • Court clerks who accept filings, set deadlines, and add the order to the docket.
  • Prosecutors or agency representatives who may respond or propose recoupment calculations.

Accurate completion ensures the document is usable at the trial and appellate levels and supports administrative review if required.

Typical Signatories and Preparers

Public Defender

Assigned counsel, supervising attorneys, or the public defender's office director typically complete and sign the response; they attest to legal objections, client indigency, and any factual inaccuracy in recoupment requests in a signed declaration.

Court Clerk

Clerks receive and file the response order, enter it on the docket, and provide certified copies for service or appeal; clerks do not endorse factual statements but must ensure procedural requirements are met.

Core Information Required on the Response Order

Defendant Name: Full legal name as in court records
Case Number: Court-assigned docket number
Court Name: Circuit court and county
Order Date: MM/DD/YYYY format
Recoupment Amount: Specify dollar amount requested
Attorney Signature: Printed name and signature

Consequences and Risks of an Incorrect or Late Response

Default Ruling: May permit recoupment without defender input
Appeal Difficulty: Incomplete record weakens appellate review
Fee Miscalculation: Overpayment or improper offsets possible
Ethics Exposure: Misstatements can trigger professional issues
Service Defect: Improper service may void filing
Record Preservation: Missing exhibits hamper future challenges

Common Preparation Errors to Avoid

  • Omitting the correct case number or court name creates filing delays and may lead the clerk to reject the submission.
  • Failing to include an itemized recoupment calculation means the court cannot verify amounts and may accept the state's figures by default.
  • Submitting unsigned or undated responses risks invalidation and may require refiling under tight deadlines.
  • Not serving the response on all interested parties causes procedural defects and can render later appeals ineffective.

Step-by-Step: Completing the Response Order

Follow these four core steps to complete and file a compliant response order in a Wisconsin recoupment matter.

  • 01
    Gather Case Data: Collect case number, client ID, and recoupment notice
  • 02
    Draft Response: State objections, factual corrections, and legal grounds
  • 03
    Review and Sign: Have supervising attorney verify and sign
  • 04
    File and Serve: Submit to court clerk and serve opposing parties

Where the Response Order Goes and Who Receives It

The response order follows a defined routing path once completed; ensure both filing and service steps are documented.

  • Court Clerk: File the original with the circuit court clerk
  • Prosecutor: Serve the district attorney or agency counsel
  • Defense File: Retain a certified copy in the public defender file
  • Defendant: Serve the defendant or their designated counsel

Setting Up a Digital Workflow for the Response Order

Configure a repeatable e-filing and signing workflow to speed processing and preserve the audit trail for recoupment responses.

Field Configuration
Authentication Method Email link or two-factor SMS code
Document Format PDF/A for long-term retention
Notification Settings Automatic on-sign and on-file alerts
Access Controls Role-based permissions for staff and counsel

Delivery Options and Technical Requirements

Choose delivery methods that match court e-filing rules and ensure signer authentication consistent with court expectations.

  • Supported Formats: PDF, DOCX accepted by most county e-filing systems
  • Integrations: Works with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and case management systems
  • Authentication: Email, SMS code, or stronger ID verification when required

Confirm local court e-filing rules before relying on a specific digital channel and maintain export copies in standard archival formats.

Typical Timelines and Filing Expectations

Deadlines vary by county and judge, but certain common timelines apply; verify the specific court order for exact dates.

Court-Specified Response:

Often 14–30 days from service; follow the judge's deadline

Service of Documents:

Complete personal or mail service per local rules within stated time

Clerk Filing:

File original with clerk immediately after signing

Appeal Window:

Appeal periods follow Wisconsin appellate rules; check order

Record Retention:

Keep filing and exhibits for the life of the case plus retention period

Comparison: eSignature Solutions for Completing and Filing the Response Order

This table compares common eSignature vendors and core plan markers relevant to public defender offices handling frequent court forms and recoupment responses.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes Varies by plan
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No

Frequently Asked Questions About the Response Order

Answers to common procedural, filing, and eSignature questions encountered when preparing a Wisconsin Public Defender Response Order Concerning Recoupment.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users