Establishing secure connection… Loading editor… Preparing document…
Navigation

Fill and Sign the Standard Form 299

Fill and Sign the Standard Form 299

How it works

Open the document and fill out all its fields.
Apply your legally-binding eSignature.
Save and invite other recipients to sign it.

Rate template

4.5
52 votes
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Financial Management Systems-SCOAP (FMS-SCOAP) Revision: 1.01 Farm Service Agency Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP (FMS-SCOAP) Document Information Business Owner Details Name Dennis Taitano Contact Number (202) 720-3674 E-mail Address Dennis.Taitano@wdc.usda.gov Document Revision and History Revision 1.01 Page ii Date May 13, 2010 Author Anita Trader, ISO DR Comments Initial version for 2010 copied from 2009 FMS PIA Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP (FMS-SCOAP) Table of Contents 1 PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT ............................................................................................1 2 SYSTEM INFORMATION ...............................................................................................2 3 DATA INFORMATION ....................................................................................................3 3.1 Data Collection ....................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Data Use ............................................................................................................................4 3.3 Data Retention........................................................................................................ 5 3.4 Data Sharing ....................................................................................................... 6 3.5 Data Access .......................................................................................................... 7 3.6 Customer Protection................................................................................................... 8 4 SYSTEM OF RECORD .................................................................................................. 10 5 TECHNOLOGY .............................................................................................................. 11 6 COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS ................................................................................ 12 Page iii Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP (FMS-SCOAP) 1 Purpose of Document USDA DM 3515-002 states: “Agencies are responsible for initiating the PIA in the early stages of the development of a system and to ensure that the PIA is completed as part of the required System Life Cycle (SLC) reviews. Systems include data from applications housed on mainframes, personal computers, and applications developed for the Web and agency databases. Privacy must be considered when requirements are being analyzed and decisions are being made about data usage and system design. This applies to all of the development methodologies and system life cycles used in USDA. Both the system owners and system developers must work together to complete the PIA. System owners must address what data are used, how the data are used, and who will use the data. System owners also need to address the privacy implications that result from the use of new technologies (e.g., caller identification). The system developers must address whether the implementation of the owner’s requirements presents any threats to privacy.” The Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) document contains information on how the Financial Management Systems-SCOAP affects the privacy of its users and the information stored within. This assessment is in accordance with NIST SP 800-37 Guide for the Security Certification and Accreditation ofFederal Information Systems. Page1 Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP 2 System Information System Information Agency: Farm Service Agency System Name: Financial Management Systems-SCOAP System Type: Major Application General Support System Non-major Application System Categorization (per FIPS 199): High Moderate Low Description of System: Who owns this system? (Name, agency, contact information) Financial Management System (FMS) State and County Office Automated Project (SCOAP), which collects service center accounting transactions transmitted from the State and Counties, the National Payment Service (NPS), and National Receipts and Receivables System (NRRS) and passes validated data to CORE for the generation of accounting entries. Angela Sieg FSA/ITSD/ADC/AFAO 6501 Beacon Drive Kansas City MO 64133 (816) 926-1568 Angela.Sieg@kcc.usda.gov Who is the security contact for this system? (Name, agency, contact information) Brian Davies Information System Security Program Manager (IS SPM) U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency 1400 Independence Avenue SW Who completed this document? (Name, agency, contact information) Washington, D.C. 20250 (202) 720-2419 brian.davies@wdc.usda.gov Thomas Cranwill 6501 Beacon Drive Kansas City MO 64133 (816) 926-2154 thomas.cranwill@kcc.usda.gov Page 2 Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP 3 Data Information 3.1 Data Collection No. 1 Question Generally describe the data to be used in the system. 2 Does the system collect Social Security Numbers (SSNs) or Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TINs)? 2.1 State the law or regulation that requires the collection of this information. 3 Is the use of the data both relevant and necessary to the purpose for which the system is being designed? In other words, the data is absolutely needed and has significant and demonstrable bearing on the system’s purpose as required by statute or by Executive order of the President. Sources of the data in the system. 4 Response Detail transaction data is passed to multiple subsidiary systems and also retained in FMSSCOAP (SCOAP2 database). Yes No – If NO, go to question 3. The Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act (15 U.S.C. 714 et seq.) and Executive Order 9397. Ye s No Manual inputs by FSA employees; Financial Management System -- State & County Office Automation Project (FMS-SCOAP) 4.1 What data is being collected from the customer? 4.2 What USDA agencies are providing data for use in the system? 4.3 What state and local agencies are providing data for use in the system? From what other third party sources is data being collected? 4.4 5 Page 4 Will data be collected from sources outside your agency? For example, customers, USDA sources (i.e., NFC, RD, etc.) or Non-USDA sources. Financial Management Reporting System Data Warehouse: Detail transaction data is received from FMSSCOAP. Summary transaction data is passed from Name, Address, SSN, TIN N/A none Cotton Cooperatives, Peanut Marketing Association, banking institutions, CADE Data File, Farmers, Producers, vendors. Yes No – If NO, go to question 6. Customer information is collected by FSA State and County offices. Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP No. 5.1 Question How will the data collected from customers be verified for accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness? Response Accuracy will be verified using: Standard Accounting Practices; CTCS has Interface stats reports and balancing controls, Automated system validations. Completeness will be checked using a mixture of human and automated review by: -System edit validations, -Daily balancing comparing General Ledger activity with applicable subsidiaries. -Each payment must contain minimal FSA accounting information or the payment will be rejected. Service Center employees are responsible for the ‘certification’ approval and ‘signing’ approval of each payment request. -Control records on batch interface files 5.2 How will the data collected from USDA sources be verified for accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness? See 5.1 above 5.3 How will the data collected from non-USDA sources be verified for accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness? See 5.1 above 3.2 Data Use No. 6 7 7.1 8 Page 5 Question Individuals must be informed in writing of the principal purpose of the information being collected from them. What is the principal purpose of the data being collected? Will the data be used for any other purpose? Response FOIA provides member payment data (1614) to requesting organizations for statistical and public reporting. Yes No – If NO, go to question 8. What are the other purposes? Is the use of the data both relevant and necessary to the purpose for which the system is being designed? In other words, the data is absolutely needed and has significant and demonstrable bearing on the system’s purpose as required by statute or by Executive order of the President Ye s No Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP No. 9 Question Will the system derive new data or create previously unavailable data about an individual through aggregation from the information collected (i.e., aggregating farm loans by zip codes in which only one farm exists.)? 9.1 Will the new data be placed in the individual’s record (customer or employee)? 9.2 Can the system make determinations about customers or employees that would not be possible without the new data? 9.3 How will the new data be verified for relevance and accuracy? 10 Individuals must be informed in writing of the routine uses of the information being collected from them. What are the intended routine uses of the data being collected? 11 Will the data be used for any other uses (routine or otherwise)? 11.1 What are the other uses? 12 Automation of systems can lead to the consolidation of data – bringing data from multiple sources into one central location/system – and consolidation of administrative controls. When administrative controls are consolidated, they should be evaluated so that all necessary privacy controls remain in place to the degree necessary to continue to control access to and use of the data. Is data being consolidated? 12.1 What controls are in place to protect the data and prevent unauthorized access? 13 Are processes being consolidated? Response Yes No – If NO, go to question 10. Ye s Ye s No The data is used for service center and National Payment Service (NPS) accounting transactions. Yes No – If NO, go to question 12. Yes No – If NO, go to question 13. FOIA provides member payment data (1614) to requesting organizations for statistical and public reporting. Yes No – If NO, go to question 14. 13.1 What controls are in place to protect the data and prevent unauthorized access? 3.3 Data Retention No. Page 6 Question Response Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP No. 14 Question Is the data periodically purged from the system? Response Yes No – If NO, go to question 15. 14.1 How long is the data retained whether it is on paper, electronic, in the system or in a backup? Up to 6 years and longer in some instances. 14.2 What are the procedures for purging the data at the end of the retention period? Refer to USDA standard media disposal policy and procedure found in FSA 6-IRM and USDA DR 3601-001 Refer to USDA standard media disposal policy and procedure found in FSA 6-IRM and USDA DR 3601-001 14.3 Where are these procedures documented? 15 While the data is retained in the system, what are the requirements for determining if the data is still sufficiently accurate, relevant, timely, and complete to ensure fairness in making determinations? 16 Is the data retained in the system the minimum necessary for the proper performance of a documented agency function? Data, after completion is not altered. The information is protected by agency policies and the security controls issued by USDA. The key is to ensure the accuracy of this data prior to entering it into the system. The key method utilized is the Acceptance Testing process. Ye s No 3.4 Data Sharing No. 17 Question Will other agencies share data or have access to data in this system (i.e., international, federal, state, local, other, etc.)? Response Yes No – If NO, go to question 18. Financial Management System: Data from 1614 is extracted from FMRS and provided to the FOIA group for disbursement IRS Reporting System: IRS , Government Agencies upon request, FOIA requests. 17.1 How will the data be used by the other agency? Financial Management System: FOIA provides member payment data (1614) to requesting organizations for statistical and public reporting. CORE: Eliminations entry for financial statements. IRS Reporting System: Reporting information to the IRS Page 7 Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP No. Question 17.2 Who is responsible for assuring the other agency properly uses the data? Response Financial Management System: FOIA CORE: Receiving agency is responsible for following OMB guidance. IRS Reporting System: FSA/FMD 18 Is the data transmitted to another agency or an independent site? 18.1 Is there appropriate agreement in place to document the interconnection and ensure the PII and/or Privacy Act data is appropriately protected? 19 Is the system operated in more than one site? Yes No – If NO, go to question 19. Yes No – If NO, go to question 20. Financial Management System & CORE: - No IRS Reporting System: Yes 19.1 How will consistent use of the system and data be maintained in all sites? IRS Reporting System: Consult 61RM for details of the configuration management process for this system. 3.5 Data Access No. 20 21 21.1 22 22.1 Page 8 Question Who will have access to the data in the system (i.e., users, managers, system administrators, developers, etc.)? How will user access to the data be determined? Are criteria, procedures, controls, and responsibilities regarding user access documented? How will user access to the data be restricted? Are procedures in place to detect or deter browsing or unauthorized user access? Response Users, Managers, System Administrators, Developers Data is segregated by functional responsibility. FAO maintains the internal application security table Ye s No No restrictions to read data. Write capabilities are restricted by User ID. FAO maintains the internal application security table. Ye s No Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP No. 23 Question Does the system employ security controls to make information unusable to unauthorized individuals (i.e., encryption, strong authentication procedures, etc.)? Response Ye s No 3.6 Customer Protection No. 24 25 26 Question Who will be responsible for protecting the privacy rights of the customers and employees affected by the interface (i.e., office, person, departmental position, etc.)? How can customers and employees contact the office or person responsible for protecting their privacy rights? A “breach” refers to a situation where data and/or information assets are unduly exposed. Is a breach notification policy in place for this system? 26.1 If NO, please enter the Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) number with the estimated completion date. 27 Consider the following: Consolidation and linkage of files and systems Derivation of data Accelerated information processing and decision making Use of new technologies Is there a potential to deprive a customer of due process rights (fundamental rules of fairness)? Response Production Adjustment and Risk Management Office and USDA Privacy Office. FSA National Help Desk at (800)-255-2434 or the Centralized Help Desk at 800-457-3642 or By contacting John W. Underwood, Privacy Officer, at FSA Privacy Act Officer / FSA PII Officer USDA - Farm Service Agency Beacon Facility - Mail Stop 8388 9240 Troost Avenue Kansas City, Missouri 6413 1-3055 Phone: 816-926-6992 Cell: 816-564-8950 Fax: 816-448-5833 mailto:john.underwood@kcc.usda.gov Yes – If YES, go to question 27. Common FSA incident reporting process. No Yes No – If NO, go to question 28. 27.1 Explain how this will be mitigated? Page 9 Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP No. 28 Question How will the system and its use ensure equitable treatment of customers? 29 Is there any possibility of treating customers or employees differently based upon their individual or group characteristics? Response The Financial Management Systems are implemented using a methodology that ensures data processing will be accomplished in the same manner for all customers. Yes No – If NO, go to question 30 29.1 Explain Page 10 Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP 4 System of Record No. 30 30.1 Question Can the data be retrieved by a personal identifier? In other words, does the system actually retrieve data by the name of an individual or by some other unique number, symbol, or identifying attribute of the individual? How will the data be retrieved? In other words, what is the identifying attribute (i.e., employee number, social security number, etc.)? 30.2 Under which Systems of Record (SOR) notice does the system operate? Provide number, name and publication date. (SORs can be viewed at www.access.GPO.gov.) 30.3 If the system is being modified, will the SOR require amendment or revision? Page 11 Response Yes No – If NO, go to question 31 Data is retrieved based on level it was recorded. Financial Management Systems and FMRS : SSN Farm Records File (Automated) USDA FSA-2, Applicant Borrower, USDA/F SA-14 Ye s No Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP 5 Technology No. 31 Question Is the system using technologies in ways not previously employed by the agency (e.g., Caller-ID)? Response Yes No – If NO, the questionnaire is complete. 31.1 How does the use of this technology affect customer privacy? Page 12 Date: May 13, 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment for Financial Management Systems-SCOAP (FMS-SCOAP) 6 Completion Instructions Upon completion of this Privacy Impact Assessment for this system, the answer to OMB A-1 1, Planning, Budgeting, Acquisition and Management of Capital Assets, Part 7, Section E, Question 8cis: 1.Yes. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY TO THE OFFICE OF THE ASSOCIATE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICE FOR CYBER SECURITY. Page 13 Date: May 13, 2010

Useful advice on getting your ‘Standard Form 299’ online

Are you fed up with the complications of managing documents? Look no further than airSlate SignNow, the premier eSignature solution for individuals and small to medium-sized businesses. Bid farewell to the lengthy process of printing and scanning documents. With airSlate SignNow, you can seamlessly finalize and sign documents online. Leverage the robust features integrated into this intuitive and budget-friendly platform and transform your method of document management. Whether you need to sign documents or collect eSignatures, airSlate SignNow takes care of it all with just a few clicks.

Follow this detailed guide:

  1. Access your account or initiate a complimentary trial with our service.
  2. Click +Create to upload a file from your device, storage cloud, or our form library.
  3. Edit your ‘Standard Form 299’ in the editor.
  4. Select Me (Fill Out Now) to finish the document on your end.
  5. Add and designate fillable fields for others (if necessary).
  6. Continue with the Send Invite settings to solicit eSignatures from others.
  7. Download, print your version, or transform it into a reusable template.

Don’t worry if you need to collaborate with your coworkers on your Standard Form 299 or send it for notarization—our service provides everything necessary to accomplish such tasks. Sign up with airSlate SignNow today and elevate your document management to new levels!

Here is a list of the most common customer questions. If you can’t find an answer to your question, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us.

Need help? Contact Support
299 in standard form math
299 in standard form worksheets
299 in standard form 2nd grade
299 in standard form pdf
299 in standard form math
299 in standard form calculator
299 in standard form worksheet
299 in standard form example
299 in standard form pdf
630 in expanded form
42 tens is the same as
Sign up and try Standard form 299
  • Close deals faster
  • Improve productivity
  • Delight customers
  • Increase revenue
  • Save time & money
  • Reduce payment cycles