Ensuring Digital Signature Legitimacy for Affidavit of Title in United States

How to eSign a document: digital signature legitimacy for Affidavit of Title in United States

[Music] how to sign your signature without liability an overview big brother's master plan to subjugate the entire human race is utterly dependent on people continuing to volunteer for and finance their own enslavement without such large easy from the public the chosen masters face certain calamity and exposure for their crimes heretofore system operatives have been overwhelmingly successful at duping unwitting victims into volunteering for virtually every kind of financial hill imaginable and make no mistakes it is purely voluntary the system is working exactly as it is designed to do and the chroniclers of chaos proudly trumpet their statistics as they end forward in their dreams of total world domination it is no coincidence that the introduction and popularity of the real estate board game monopoly parallels the history of the money changers financial conquest of america culminating with its copyright by parker brothers in 1935. the same time that we were converted over from a substance goldback currency to a belief credit back currency on the 31st of december 1935 the board game monopoly was patented although the patent for the game was awarded to charles b darrow a philadelphia heating salesman who had lost his job during the great depression it's now widely recognized that darrow was just one of many people who led to the development of the complex design and rules that we now know as monopoly as early as 1902 an illinois-born writer and engineer called lizzie maggie created a board game that she referred to as the landlord's game and which bore striking similarities to the later monopoly she painted this game in 1904 and approached parker brothers with the idea in around 1910 although that board game manufacturer declined to publish it her self-produced copies became popular with quakers university students and members of the public who supported georgist economics meiji by now married and with the new name phillips repatented an updated version of the game in 1924 when she was again turned down by parker brothers however the updated version spread widely through word of mouth and charles darrow's wife eventually learned about it darrow began to copy and distribute his own version of the game and in october 1934 was himself rejected by parker brothers who found his game too complicated too technical and that it took too long to play however successful christmas sales of darrow's game led parker brothers to reverse their decision and bought the game from darrow in march 1935 before the end of the year they learned that he was not the sole inventor but they pressed ahead with the purchase and helped him to secure a patent while they bought up the patents to similar games including the landlord's game to ensure that they had definitive ownership of the whole idea the game's logo even confesses the caricature of a white mustachioed english banker complete with tom pad tails and kane the objective in the board game of monopoly is to drive into bankruptcy all other players an arrangement otherwise known as tontine wagering scheme and so it is in real life if you examine the nature of economics in america today you will see that everyone is competing for the same rationed amount of monopoly money called federal reserve notes and attempting to stay above water and avoid bankruptcy this is by definition a de facto state of war between participants in both the board game and the game of life the only way to stay in the game of monopoly and avoid bankruptcy is to obtain more monopoly money from other players the only way to stay in the game of life and avoid bankruptcy is to somehow obtain more federal reserve notes from the other players around you and both the outcome is inevitable the longest running game of monopoly lasted 70 days but still ended the same way as all others before and since but one player acquiring all the wealth and all the other players bankrupt unfortunately there can be no other final conclusion in the federal reserve no game of life either no matter how long you stretch it out unless of course you simply stop volunteering to play the game volunteering the most devastating form of volunteering occurs when someone promises and people do this unflinchingly every single day to be responsible for and pay the depths of another party believe it or not this is how every unwary soul is sealed as faith the trade name game in other words that which the content of this book is dedicated to exposing untangling and rectifying has an evil twin that works in concert with it as you will discover toward the end of this article the legal masters of the world are factually imminently aware of the distinction between your true name and the trade name and have come up with an incredibly ingenious device for exploiting the difference without tipping their hand the reason that every complaint unfailingly cites the defendant's respondent's name in all capital letters the reason the name on every license is set in all capital letters the reason the name on every social security card has been converted from english as originally written on the application and to legalese the reason that all banks insist on listing all accounts not in the true name of the party walks in and fills out the forms but in the artificial trade name associated there with is the same to conduct business with you via an unknown invisible corporally colored artificial person that is subject to all statutory regulation and therefore under their complete control and power the same applies equally when either of the two names is called out verbally remember differently constructed names comprise distinct items of property however similar filing a ucc financing statement is the first step in releasing yourself from these bonds the second is cessation of volunteering to be responsible for the trade names obligation by signing on its behalf when someone signs his name on a commercial instrument listed in the straw man's trade name he finalizes his financial obligations in that particular transaction and also contributes just that much more in the chosen masters designs for a new world order that order is an economic pecking order with them owning literally everything at the top and you and your family and friends owning nothing including your labor at the bottom article 3 negotiable instruments of the uniform commercial code has been written to argument the liabilities that come with signing on behalf of another but has also been encrypted to keep curious slaves from finding out how they are being duped because the legal masters of the world cannot bind us into perpetual servitude without also offering a route for escape we have remedy in the ucc unraveling the mystery the key entry point into article 3 of the subject of signatures is this the general rule is that a signature is an endorsement if the instrument does not indicate an unambiguous intent on the signer not to sign as an endorser intent may be determined by words accompanying the signature the place of signature or other circumstances 3-204 note 1 paragraph 2. even without defining the key term endorser the meaning is clear in the absence of indicating an unambiguous intent a signature can be construed as an endorsement endorser a person who makes an endorsement ucc3-204b endorsement means a signature other than that of a signer as maker drawer or acceptor that a alone or accompanied by other words is made on an instrument for the purpose of one negotiating the instrument two restricting payment of the instrument or three and current endorses liability on the instrument but regardless of the intent of the signer a signature and its accompanying words is an endorsement unless the accompanying words terms of the instrument place of the signature or the circumstances unambiguously indicate that the signature was made for a purpose other than endorsement for the purpose of determining whether a signature is made on an instrument a paper affixed to the instrument is part of the instrument ucc3-204a makers drawers and acceptors are the primary types of signers of negotiable instruments maker means a person who signs or is identified in a note as a person undertaking the pay ucc 3-1035 drawer means a person who signs or is identified in a draft as a person ordering payment ucc3-1033 acceptor means a drawee who has accepted a draft ucc 3-1031 draw e means a person ordered in a draft to make payment ucc 3-1032 accommodation parties how could one sign a negotiable instrument irrespective of the signer's awareness that what he is signing is a negotiable instrument and incur liability is anything other than a maker draw or acceptor answer as an accommodation party accommodation party is described in no one under ucc 3-419 an accommodation party is a person who signs an instrument to benefit the accommodated party either by signing at the time value is obtained by the accommodated party or later and who is not a direct beneficiary of the value obtained an accommodation party will usually be a co-maker or anomalous endorser in the ucc one of the meanings of value is essentially credit you qualify on this point because you have been the sole source of credit for your trade name since inception birth and are not a direct beneficiary of the value given what you get is liability the meaning of co-maker can be deduced from the definition of maker above but is nevertheless a subordinate identifier in respect of accommodation party anomalous means departing from the common rule irregular the ucc defines anomalous endorsement as follows anomalous endorsement means an endorsement made by a person who is not the holder of the instrument an anomalous endorsement does not affect the manner in which the instrument may be negotiated ucc 3-205-d an anomalous endorsement is made by a party that is not the holder of the instrument in other words no rights in the instrument and qualifies nevertheless as a valid endorsement even though not specifically that of maker drawer or acceptor that would not adversely affect the negotiability of the instrument but this section is imbued with vagueness opens the door for other factors to enter in but we are not told what those factors might be the purpose of codes summing up on accommodation party someone who signs on behalf of another for the purpose of benefiting that party and who is also not a direct beneficiary of the value obtained by the accommodated party an accommodation party is not a maker not a drawer and not an acceptor but has an anomalous role in the endorsement process apparently an accommodation party bears full liability for the accommodated party but stands to gain nothing by participating this is obviously the most inferior status one can have because he is completely out of control of his own destiny based on the mischief that the trade name gets into and the misadventures that follow thereafter wrapping up on accommodated party the worst kiss of death has been saved for last an accommodation party is always a surety ucc 3-419 note 3 paragraph 2. as you know from the course of co-surety ship in section 3 a surety is utterly responsible for anything and everything that the principal depther is responsible for including both payment and specific performance an accommodation party is automatically and always a surety for the accommodated party when you the flesh and blood man slash woman sign an instrument even if you do not know that you are signing a negotiable instrument such as a traffic ticket bearing the straw man's trade name you're assigning as an accommodation party and bear full personal responsibility and accountability for whatever the straw man has gotten itself into including the potential for incarceration remember a surety is an equal of the principle the creditor is authorized to treat the surety exactly as though the surety was a principal dempter and extract both payment and specific performance since your strawman is rather difficult to locate and identify no physical existence you and your body serve nicely light at the end of the tunnel now for the 64 question how can you avoid ever being considered as an accommodation party your signature ever being construed as an accommodation signature the answer is found in notes one and two of section 3-402 number one subsection a states when the represented person is bound on an instrument if the instrument is signed by a representative if under the law of agency the represented person would be bound by the act of the representative and signing either the name of the represented person or that of the representative the signature is the authorized signature of the represented person two subsection b1 states that if the form of the signature unambiguously shows that if it is made on behalf of an identified represented person for example p by a treasurer the agent is not liable this is a workable standard for a court to apply translation you're removed from the realm of liability of being construed as a maker drawer acceptor or accommodation party and therefore as a surety by unambiguously identifying your signature as that of authorized representative signing in this fashion removes all doubt unambiguously indicates read the exact identification of the signing party it also relieves the signer of all legal liability for the principles represented person's obligation the key is to be as unambiguous and as expositional as you can to reveal as much as possible about your agency status and however little space you have to work with on the instrument writing above and below works also as long as it is unambiguous some interchangeable examples of workable signatures are also inserting the words authorized signature in a conspicuous unambiguous manner such as below the signature line helps in indicating signers agency status total confirmation from big brother of the validity of what we are doing the final segment of this short essay reveals something that will convince even the fiercest naysayer at least those who are not on big brother's payroll of the correctness of our hunches and the criminal intent of the legal masters of the world looking at note 3 of ucc 3-402 which has to do with checks we find subsection 3 is directed at the check cases it states that if the check identifies the represented person the agent who signs does not have to indicate agency status virtually all checks used today are in personalized form which identify the person on whose account the check is drawn in this case nobody is deceived into thinking that the person signing the check is meant to be liable therefore apparently when the name of the represented person is printed on the face of the check any agent signing for the represented person need not indicate agency status virtually all checks used today are personalized to identify the account holder and since virtually all checks used today are personalized nobody is deceived into thinking that the person signing the check is meant to be liable if he is signing as an agent follow this procedure go online and pull up .deluxe.com under personal checks check on browse our full line of check designs wait a few moments while the next page the luck personal checks catalog comes up click on about checks and then scroll down to check security features and observe the arrow marked microprinting and pointing at the signature line of the check next take out one of your personal not business checks and place it under a magnifying glass or microscope place it so the signature line is directly under the lens below is a blow up of what you will see when you scrutinize the lines authorized signature arthrin signature editing note 3 of ucc 3-4-2 from above in this case nobody except the signer is deceived into thinking that the person signing the check is meant to be liable deluxe openly prints out the words authorized signature underneath the signature line of business checks but disguises the same proclamation on personal checks the reason the signature line on a personal check is made up of words authorized signature is because it is a physical impossibility that the account holder will ever sign the check the account holder is an artificial person in other words john henry doe in all caps and exist in name only the fed knows that every signature appearing on a personal check is the signature of the flesh and blood agent the authorized representative however this fact must be concealed in order to cause a signer to believe that he is the principal when he actually signs his accommodation party in other words surety and therefore 100 liable for everything the principal is liable for this applies in every signature on every document not just personal checks deluxe and other check manufacturing companies must do this if they want to sell personal checks to fed customers apparently this is how the fed justifies their deceit and duplicity we told them we put it right there on the check leaf we can't help it if they're too stupid to know that they are not the authorized representative when they decided to accept responsibility as the accommodation party for the account holder they did so voluntarily we can't help it if they volunteered to do something we did everything we could to make it easier for them we even personalized the checks with the account holder's name and spelled it out authorized signature right there on the signature line to save them the headache of having to write out authorized representative every time they signed a check we can't be blamed for their ignorance we were not supposed to find out about this device but its existence is a full-blown confession an acknowledgement and validation of everything propounded in this book read the distinction between true name and trade name big brother knows precisely what it is doing re-subjugating us via the names welcome to the real world your signature if you cc delineated check signing procedures are so important for federal reserve owners and the manufacturers of checks used within that system it should be important for you as well the overwhelming significance of fed acknowledgment of the difference between the names by virtue of the inclusion of this artiface on every check cannot be exaggerated in fact this discovery alone is conclusive proof of their deceit in every controversy involving the trade name remember the fed literally owns the government and therefore everything in america this is confirmed in senate document 43 73rd congress first session see entry by the same name and glossary the message you do not have to continue to volunteer to be responsible for the trade names obligations financial and otherwise you can begin to fixing your signature in the proper fashion now that you know the truth you can always prove that you are nothing more than the authorized rep merely by pointing out the statement made on the signature line of your checking account this phenomenon has unlimited application in your life it is so profound that if someone were to be arrested and subsequently asked to sign a bond he could do so as set forth above and incur zero liability forever having to do with either the bond or the criminal charge associated there with the distinction between the parties is undeniable in closing the czech signature line subterfuge can be used to prove the legal correctness of what we are doing with anyone including a stubborn secretary of state who refuses to found a financing statement based on the hacking eye rules that you are contracting with yourself if there were no difference between trade name and true name the fed would not have taken such extreme measures to conceal the fact that the signer of a personal check is only the agent this revelation should bring about a sharp improvement in the lives of former slaves whenever a signature is required [Music] [Music] you