Digital Signature Legitimacy for Termination Letter in United States

  • Quick to start
  • Easy-to-use
  • 24/7 support

Award-winning eSignature solution

Simplified document journeys for small teams and individuals

eSign from anywhere
Upload documents from your device or cloud and add your signature with ease: draw, upload, or type it on your mobile device or laptop.
Prepare documents for sending
Drag and drop fillable fields on your document and assign them to recipients. Reduce document errors and delight clients with an intuitive signing process.
Secure signing is our priority
Secure your documents by setting two-factor signer authentication. View who made changes and when in your document with the court-admissible Audit Trail.
Collect signatures on the first try
Define a signing order, configure reminders for signers, and set your document’s expiration date. signNow will send you instant updates once your document is signed.

We spread the word about digital transformation

signNow empowers users across every industry to embrace seamless and error-free eSignature workflows for better business outcomes.

80%
completion rate of sent documents
80% completed
1h
average for a sent to signed document
20+
out-of-the-box integrations
96k
average number of signature invites sent in a week
28,9k
users in Education industry
2
clicks minimum to sign a document
14.3M
API calls a week
code
code
be ready to get more

Why choose airSlate SignNow

    • Free 7-day trial. Choose the plan you need and try it risk-free.
    • Honest pricing for full-featured plans. airSlate SignNow offers subscription plans with no overages or hidden fees at renewal.
    • Enterprise-grade security. airSlate SignNow helps you comply with global security standards.
illustrations signature
walmart logo
exonMobil logo
apple logo
comcast logo
facebook logo
FedEx logo

Your complete how-to guide - digital signature legitimacy for termination letter in united states

Self-sign documents and request signatures anywhere and anytime: get convenience, flexibility, and compliance.

Digital Signature Legitimacy for Termination Letter in United States

When terminating an employment contract or any agreement in the United States, it is crucial to ensure the legitimacy of the digital signatures on the termination letter. One reliable solution for this is to use airSlate SignNow, a platform that enables users to send and eSign documents securely and efficiently.

User Guide for Using airSlate SignNow for Digital Signatures:

  • Launch the airSlate SignNow web page in your browser.
  • Sign up for a free trial or log in.
  • Upload a document you want to sign or send for signing.
  • If you're going to reuse your document later, turn it into a template.
  • Open your file and make edits: add fillable fields or insert information.
  • Sign your document and add signature fields for the recipients.
  • Click Continue to set up and send an eSignature invite.

airSlate SignNow empowers businesses to send and eSign documents with an easy-to-use, cost-effective solution. It offers a great ROI with a rich feature set for the budget spent, is easy to use and scale, tailored for SMBs and Mid-Market businesses, has transparent pricing with no hidden support fees and add-on costs, and provides superior 24/7 support for all paid plans.

Experience the benefits of airSlate SignNow today and streamline your document signing processes!

How it works

Rate your experience

4.6
1622 votes
Thanks! You've rated this eSignature
Collect signatures
24x
faster
Reduce costs by
$30
per document
Save up to
40h
per employee / month
be ready to get more

Get legally-binding signatures now!

  • Best ROI. Our customers achieve an average 7x ROI within the first six months.
  • Scales with your use cases. From SMBs to mid-market, airSlate SignNow delivers results for businesses of all sizes.
  • Intuitive UI and API. Sign and send documents from your apps in minutes.

FAQs

Below is a list of the most common questions about digital signatures. Get answers within minutes.

Related searches to digital signature legitimacy for termination letter in united states

Electronic signature laws by state
What makes an electronic signature legally binding
what are the four requirements for an electronic signature to be valid?
What documents cannot be signed electronically
Acceptable electronic signatures
legal electronic signature /s/ example
Legal signature requirements
ESIGN Act
be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

How to eSign a document: digital signature legitimacy for Termination Letter in United States

ANNOUNCED ANNOUNCED ANY ANNOUNCED ANY ARRESTS ANNOUNCED ANY ARRESTS THOUGH. ANNOUNCED ANY ARRESTS THOUGH. >>> ANNOUNCED ANY ARRESTS THOUGH. >>> NOW ANNOUNCED ANY ARRESTS THOUGH. >>> NOW TO ANNOUNCED ANY ARRESTS THOUGH. >>> NOW TO A ANNOUNCED ANY ARRESTS THOUGH. >>> NOW TO A DEFENDERS ANNOUNCED ANY ARRESTS THOUGH. >>> NOW TO A DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION. >>> NOW TO A DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION. >>> NOW TO A DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION. BACK >>> NOW TO A DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION. BACK IN >>> NOW TO A DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION. BACK IN NOVEMBER, >>> NOW TO A DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION. BACK IN NOVEMBER, WE >>> NOW TO A DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION. BACK IN NOVEMBER, WE DISCOVERED INVESTIGATION. BACK IN NOVEMBER, WE DISCOVERED INVESTIGATION. BACK IN NOVEMBER, WE DISCOVERED SCAMMERS INVESTIGATION. BACK IN NOVEMBER, WE DISCOVERED SCAMMERS IN INVESTIGATION. BACK IN NOVEMBER, WE DISCOVERED SCAMMERS IN CHARLOTTE INVESTIGATION. BACK IN NOVEMBER, WE DISCOVERED SCAMMERS IN CHARLOTTE WERE BACK IN NOVEMBER, WE DISCOVERED SCAMMERS IN CHARLOTTE WERE BACK IN NOVEMBER, WE DISCOVERED SCAMMERS IN CHARLOTTE WERE FORGING BACK IN NOVEMBER, WE DISCOVERED SCAMMERS IN CHARLOTTE WERE FORGING PEOPLE'S BACK IN NOVEMBER, WE DISCOVERED SCAMMERS IN CHARLOTTE WERE FORGING PEOPLE'S SIGNATURES BACK IN NOVEMBER, WE DISCOVERED SCAMMERS IN CHARLOTTE WERE FORGING PEOPLE'S SIGNATURES TO SCAMMERS IN CHARLOTTE WERE FORGING PEOPLE'S SIGNATURES TO SCAMMERS IN CHARLOTTE WERE FORGING PEOPLE'S SIGNATURES TO SELL SCAMMERS IN CHARLOTTE WERE FORGING PEOPLE'S SIGNATURES TO SELL THEIR SCAMMERS IN CHARLOTTE WERE FORGING PEOPLE'S SIGNATURES TO SELL THEIR HOMES SCAMMERS IN CHARLOTTE WERE FORGING PEOPLE'S SIGNATURES TO SELL THEIR HOMES WITHOUT FORGING PEOPLE'S SIGNATURES TO SELL THEIR HOMES WITHOUT FORGING PEOPLE'S SIGNATURES TO SELL THEIR HOMES WITHOUT PERMISSION. SELL THEIR HOMES WITHOUT PERMISSION. SELL THEIR HOMES WITHOUT PERMISSION. >> SELL THEIR HOMES WITHOUT PERMISSION. >> TONIGHT, SELL THEIR HOMES WITHOUT PERMISSION. >> TONIGHT, OUR SELL THEIR HOMES WITHOUT PERMISSION. >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM SELL THEIR HOMES WITHOUT PERMISSION. >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS PERMISSION. >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS PERMISSION. >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS LEARNED PERMISSION. >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS LEARNED IT PERMISSION. >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS LEARNED IT DOESN'T PERMISSION. >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP PERMISSION. >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. WE >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. WE FOUND >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. WE FOUND OUT >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. WE FOUND OUT DOZENS >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF >> TONIGHT, OUR TEAM HAS LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED NOTARY LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED NOTARY PUBLICS LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS LEARNED IT DOESN'T STOP THERE. WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS NORTH WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS NORTH WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS NORTH CAROLINA WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS NORTH CAROLINA WHO WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS NORTH CAROLINA WHO ARE WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS NORTH CAROLINA WHO ARE IN WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS NORTH CAROLINA WHO ARE IN CHARGE WE FOUND OUT DOZENS OF LICENSED NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS NORTH CAROLINA WHO ARE IN CHARGE OF NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS NORTH CAROLINA WHO ARE IN CHARGE OF NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS NORTH CAROLINA WHO ARE IN CHARGE OF SIGNING NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS NORTH CAROLINA WHO ARE IN CHARGE OF SIGNING THOSE NOTARY PUBLICS ACROSS NORTH CAROLINA WHO ARE IN CHARGE OF SIGNING THOSE IMPORTANT CAROLINA WHO ARE IN CHARGE OF SIGNING THOSE IMPORTANT CAROLINA WHO ARE IN CHARGE OF SIGNING THOSE IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS CAROLINA WHO ARE IN CHARGE OF SIGNING THOSE IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS HAVE CAROLINA WHO ARE IN CHARGE OF SIGNING THOSE IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS HAVE CRIMINAL SIGNING THOSE IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS HAVE CRIMINAL SIGNING THOSE IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS HAVE CRIMINAL RECORDS. DOCUMENTS HAVE CRIMINAL RECORDS. DOCUMENTS HAVE CRIMINAL RECORDS. THEY DOCUMENTS HAVE CRIMINAL RECORDS. THEY ARE DOCUMENTS HAVE CRIMINAL RECORDS. THEY ARE TARGETING DOCUMENTS HAVE CRIMINAL RECORDS. THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DOCUMENTS HAVE CRIMINAL RECORDS. THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY RECORDS. THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY RECORDS. THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY PEOPLE RECORDS. THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY PEOPLE LIKE RECORDS. THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY PEOPLE LIKE YOU RECORDS. THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND RECORDS. THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME RECORDS. THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY COMMITTING THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY COMMITTING FORGERY THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY COMMITTING FORGERY AND THEY ARE TARGETING EVERY DAY PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. >> PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. >> DEFENDER PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. >> DEFENDER ALEX PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME BY COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO A COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO A COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO A BEEN COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO A BEEN CRACKING COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO A BEEN CRACKING OPEN COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO A BEEN CRACKING OPEN THESE COMMITTING FORGERY AND FRAUD. >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO A BEEN CRACKING OPEN THESE CASES >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO A BEEN CRACKING OPEN THESE CASES >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO A BEEN CRACKING OPEN THESE CASES LEADING >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO A BEEN CRACKING OPEN THESE CASES LEADING LAWMAKERS >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO A BEEN CRACKING OPEN THESE CASES LEADING LAWMAKERS TO >> DEFENDER ALEX SHABAD ALSO A BEEN CRACKING OPEN THESE CASES LEADING LAWMAKERS TO LAUNCH BEEN CRACKING OPEN THESE CASES LEADING LAWMAKERS TO LAUNCH BEEN CRACKING OPEN THESE CASES LEADING LAWMAKERS TO LAUNCH THEIR BEEN CRACKING OPEN THESE CASES LEADING LAWMAKERS TO LAUNCH THEIR OWN BEEN CRACKING OPEN THESE CASES LEADING LAWMAKERS TO LAUNCH THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION. LEADING LAWMAKERS TO LAUNCH THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION. LEADING LAWMAKERS TO LAUNCH THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION. HE LEADING LAWMAKERS TO LAUNCH THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION. HE JOINS LEADING LAWMAKERS TO LAUNCH THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION. HE JOINS US LEADING LAWMAKERS TO LAUNCH THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION. HE JOINS US WITH LEADING LAWMAKERS TO LAUNCH THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION. HE JOINS US WITH WHAT LEADING LAWMAKERS TO LAUNCH THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION. HE JOINS US WITH WHAT HE'S THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION. HE JOINS US WITH WHAT HE'S THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION. HE JOINS US WITH WHAT HE'S LEARNED. HE JOINS US WITH WHAT HE'S LEARNED. HE JOINS US WITH WHAT HE'S LEARNED. >> HE JOINS US WITH WHAT HE'S LEARNED. >> Reporter: HE JOINS US WITH WHAT HE'S LEARNED. >> Reporter: WHAT HE JOINS US WITH WHAT HE'S LEARNED. >> Reporter: WHAT WE HE JOINS US WITH WHAT HE'S LEARNED. >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND HE JOINS US WITH WHAT HE'S LEARNED. >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS LEARNED. >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS LEARNED. >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS +@ LEARNED. >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS NOT LEARNED. >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS NOT ONLY LEARNED. >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS NOT ONLY SURPRISING LEARNED. >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS NOT ONLY SURPRISING US, LEARNED. >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS NOT ONLY SURPRISING US, BUT >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS NOT ONLY SURPRISING US, BUT >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS NOT ONLY SURPRISING US, BUT ALSO >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS NOT ONLY SURPRISING US, BUT ALSO A >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS NOT ONLY SURPRISING US, BUT ALSO A STATE >> Reporter: WHAT WE FOUND IS NOT ONLY SURPRISING US, BUT ALSO A STATE SENATOR. NOT ONLY SURPRISING US, BUT ALSO A STATE SENATOR. NOT ONLY SURPRISING US, BUT ALSO A STATE SENATOR. WE'RE NOT ONLY SURPRISING US, BUT ALSO A STATE SENATOR. WE'RE TALKING NOT ONLY SURPRISING US, BUT ALSO A STATE SENATOR. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOT ONLY SURPRISING US, BUT ALSO A STATE SENATOR. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOTARIES ALSO A STATE SENATOR. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOTARIES ALSO A STATE SENATOR. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOTARIES FORGING ALSO A STATE SENATOR. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOTARIES FORGING SIGNATURES ALSO A STATE SENATOR. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOTARIES FORGING SIGNATURES AND ALSO A STATE SENATOR. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOTARIES FORGING SIGNATURES AND HAVING WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOTARIES FORGING SIGNATURES AND HAVING WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOTARIES FORGING SIGNATURES AND HAVING CRIMINAL WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOTARIES FORGING SIGNATURES AND HAVING CRIMINAL RECORDS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOTARIES FORGING SIGNATURES AND HAVING CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOTARIES FORGING SIGNATURES AND HAVING CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOTARIES FORGING SIGNATURES AND HAVING CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE STATE FORGING SIGNATURES AND HAVING CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE STATE FORGING SIGNATURES AND HAVING CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE STATE NEVER FORGING SIGNATURES AND HAVING CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE STATE NEVER KNEW FORGING SIGNATURES AND HAVING CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. NOW CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. NOW WE'RE CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. NOW WE'RE LOOKING CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW CRIMINAL RECORDS THAT THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW THEY NEVER KNEW ABOUT. NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW THEY NEVER KNEW ABOUT. NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW THEY SLIPPED NEVER KNEW ABOUT. NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW THEY SLIPPED THROUGH NEVER KNEW ABOUT. NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW THEY SLIPPED THROUGH THE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW THEY SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW THEY SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW THEY SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. INK, NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW THEY SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. INK, PAPER NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW THEY SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. INK, PAPER AND NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW THEY SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. INK, PAPER AND TRUST. SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. INK, PAPER AND TRUST. SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. INK, PAPER AND TRUST. THAT'S SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. INK, PAPER AND TRUST. THAT'S THE SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. INK, PAPER AND TRUST. THAT'S THE FOUNDATION SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. INK, PAPER AND TRUST. THAT'S THE FOUNDATION FOR SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. INK, PAPER AND TRUST. THAT'S THE FOUNDATION FOR A SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. INK, PAPER AND TRUST. THAT'S THE FOUNDATION FOR A +@ INK, PAPER AND TRUST. THAT'S THE FOUNDATION FOR A +@ INK, PAPER AND TRUST. THAT'S THE FOUNDATION FOR A +@ LEGITIMATE INK, PAPER AND TRUST. THAT'S THE FOUNDATION FOR A +@ LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. THAT'S THE FOUNDATION FOR A +@ LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. THAT'S THE FOUNDATION FOR A +@ LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. >> THAT'S THE FOUNDATION FOR A +@ LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. >> IT'S THAT'S THE FOUNDATION FOR A +@ LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. >> IT'S FRAUDULENT THAT'S THE FOUNDATION FOR A +@ LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- >> LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- >> Reporter: LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- >> Reporter: WE LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- >> Reporter: WE FOUND LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO LEGITIMATE TRANSACTION. >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN THE >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN THE PEOPLE >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED WITH >> IT'S FRAUDULENT -- >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED WITH THE >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED WITH THE >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED WITH THE PROCESS >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED WITH THE PROCESS ARE >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED WITH THE PROCESS ARE TIED >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED WITH THE PROCESS ARE TIED TO >> Reporter: WE FOUND TOO OFTEN THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED WITH THE PROCESS ARE TIED TO FRAUD THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED WITH THE PROCESS ARE TIED TO FRAUD THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED WITH THE PROCESS ARE TIED TO FRAUD THEMSELVES. PROCESS ARE TIED TO FRAUD THEMSELVES. PROCESS ARE TIED TO FRAUD THEMSELVES. >> PROCESS ARE TIED TO FRAUD THEMSELVES. >> THANK PROCESS ARE TIED TO FRAUD THEMSELVES. >> THANK YOU PROCESS ARE TIED TO FRAUD THEMSELVES. >> THANK YOU FOR PROCESS ARE TIED TO FRAUD THEMSELVES. >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING PROCESS ARE TIED TO FRAUD THEMSELVES. >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO THEMSELVES. >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO THEMSELVES. >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO IT THEMSELVES. >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO IT BECAUSE THEMSELVES. >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO IT BECAUSE IT'S THEMSELVES. >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT THEMSELVES. >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I WAS >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I WAS AWARE >> THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I WAS AWARE OF. IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I WAS AWARE OF. IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I WAS AWARE OF. >> IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I WAS AWARE OF. >> Reporter: IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I WAS AWARE OF. >> Reporter: STATE IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I WAS AWARE OF. >> Reporter: STATE SENATOR THAT I WAS AWARE OF. >> Reporter: STATE SENATOR THAT I WAS AWARE OF. >> Reporter: STATE SENATOR NATASHA THAT I WAS AWARE OF. >> Reporter: STATE SENATOR NATASHA MARCUS THAT I WAS AWARE OF. >> Reporter: STATE SENATOR NATASHA MARCUS IS THAT I WAS AWARE OF. >> Reporter: STATE SENATOR NATASHA MARCUS IS RESPONDING THAT I WAS AWARE OF. >> Reporter: STATE SENATOR NATASHA MARCUS IS RESPONDING TO >> Reporter: STATE SENATOR NATASHA MARCUS IS RESPONDING TO >> Reporter: STATE SENATOR NATASHA MARCUS IS RESPONDING TO WHAT >> Reporter: STATE SENATOR NATASHA MARCUS IS RESPONDING TO WHAT OUR >> Reporter: STATE SENATOR NATASHA MARCUS IS RESPONDING TO WHAT OUR DEFENDERS NATASHA MARCUS IS RESPONDING TO WHAT OUR DEFENDERS NATASHA MARCUS IS RESPONDING TO WHAT OUR DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION NATASHA MARCUS IS RESPONDING TO WHAT OUR DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION UNCOVERED NATASHA MARCUS IS RESPONDING TO WHAT OUR DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION UNCOVERED ABOUT WHAT OUR DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION UNCOVERED ABOUT WHAT OUR DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION UNCOVERED ABOUT NOTARIES WHAT OUR DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION UNCOVERED ABOUT NOTARIES PUBLIC WHAT OUR DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION UNCOVERED ABOUT NOTARIES PUBLIC IN WHAT OUR DEFENDERS INVESTIGATION UNCOVERED ABOUT NOTARIES PUBLIC IN NORTH INVESTIGATION UNCOVERED ABOUT NOTARIES PUBLIC IN NORTH INVESTIGATION UNCOVERED ABOUT NOTARIES PUBLIC IN NORTH CAROLINA. NOTARIES PUBLIC IN NORTH CAROLINA. NOTARIES PUBLIC IN NORTH CAROLINA. PUBLIC NOTARIES PUBLIC IN NORTH CAROLINA. PUBLIC RECORDS NOTARIES PUBLIC IN NORTH CAROLINA. PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW NOTARIES PUBLIC IN NORTH CAROLINA. PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE NOTARIES PUBLIC IN NORTH CAROLINA. PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 CAROLINA. PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 CAROLINA. PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 AT CAROLINA. PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 AT LEAST CAROLINA. PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 AT LEAST 84 CAROLINA. PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES CAROLINA. PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE CAROLINA. PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF THEIR PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW SINCE 2015 AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, 22 AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, 22 OF AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, 22 OF THEM AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, 22 OF THEM IN AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION AT LEAST 84 NOTARIES HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUD, STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUD, FORGERY STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUD, FORGERY OR STRIPPED OF THEIR COMMISSIONS, 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT AND 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT AND WE'VE 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT AND WE'VE LEARNED 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 OTHERS 22 OF THEM IN CONNECTION WITH FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 OTHERS HAD FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 OTHERS HAD FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 OTHERS HAD +@ FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 OTHERS HAD CRIMINAL FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 OTHERS HAD CRIMINAL RECORDS FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 OTHERS HAD CRIMINAL RECORDS THE FRAUD, FORGERY OR EMBEZZLEMENT AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 OTHERS HAD CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 OTHERS HAD CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 OTHERS HAD CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE NEVER AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 OTHERS HAD CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE NEVER KNEW AND WE'VE LEARNED 10 OTHERS HAD CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. +@ CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. >> CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. >> THERE CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. >> THERE ARE CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. >> THERE ARE PEOPLE CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO CRIMINAL RECORDS THE STATE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SLIP NEVER KNEW ABOUT. >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SLIP NEVER KNEW ABOUT. >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SLIP THROUGH NEVER KNEW ABOUT. >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SLIP THROUGH THE NEVER KNEW ABOUT. >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SLIP THROUGH THE CRACKS NEVER KNEW ABOUT. >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SLIP THROUGH THE CRACKS AND >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SLIP THROUGH THE CRACKS AND >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SLIP THROUGH THE CRACKS AND UNFORTUNATELY >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SLIP THROUGH THE CRACKS AND UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SLIP THROUGH THE CRACKS AND UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SLIP THROUGH THE CRACKS AND UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE THROUGH THE CRACKS AND UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE THROUGH THE CRACKS AND UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAD THROUGH THE CRACKS AND UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAD A THROUGH THE CRACKS AND UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAD A NOTARY THROUGH THE CRACKS AND UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC THROUGH THE CRACKS AND UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. >> UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. >> Reporter: UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. >> Reporter: IN UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. >> Reporter: IN FACT, UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. >> Reporter: IN FACT, JUST UNFORTUNATELY SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. >> Reporter: IN FACT, JUST TAKE HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. >> Reporter: IN FACT, JUST TAKE HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. >> Reporter: IN FACT, JUST TAKE A HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. >> Reporter: IN FACT, JUST TAKE A LOOK HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. >> Reporter: IN FACT, JUST TAKE A LOOK AT HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. >> Reporter: IN FACT, JUST TAKE A LOOK AT THIS HAD A NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL. >> Reporter: IN FACT, JUST TAKE A LOOK AT THIS NOTARY'S >> Reporter: IN FACT, JUST TAKE A LOOK AT THIS NOTARY'S >> Reporter: IN FACT, JUST TAKE A LOOK AT THIS NOTARY'S TERMINATION >> Reporter: IN FACT, JUST TAKE A LOOK AT THIS NOTARY'S TERMINATION LETTER. A LOOK AT THIS NOTARY'S TERMINATION LETTER. A LOOK AT THIS NOTARY'S TERMINATION LETTER. IT A LOOK AT THIS NOTARY'S TERMINATION LETTER. IT SHOWS A LOOK AT THIS NOTARY'S TERMINATION LETTER. IT SHOWS THEY A LOOK AT THIS NOTARY'S TERMINATION LETTER. IT SHOWS THEY FAILED A LOOK AT THIS NOTARY'S TERMINATION LETTER. IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO TERMINATION LETTER. IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO TERMINATION LETTER. IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO DISCLOSE TERMINATION LETTER. IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO DISCLOSE A TERMINATION LETTER. IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL TERMINATION LETTER. IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL RECORD, IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL RECORD, IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL RECORD, BUT IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL RECORD, BUT THE IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL RECORD, BUT THE STATE IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL RECORD, BUT THE STATE ALLOWED IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL RECORD, BUT THE STATE ALLOWED THEM IT SHOWS THEY FAILED TO DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL RECORD, BUT THE STATE ALLOWED THEM TO DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL RECORD, BUT THE STATE ALLOWED THEM TO DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL RECORD, BUT THE STATE ALLOWED THEM TO RENEW DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL RECORD, BUT THE STATE ALLOWED THEM TO RENEW THEIR DISCLOSE A CRIMINAL RECORD, BUT THE STATE ALLOWED THEM TO RENEW THEIR POSITION. BUT THE STATE ALLOWED THEM TO RENEW THEIR POSITION. BUT THE STATE ALLOWED THEM TO RENEW THEIR POSITION. IS BUT THE STATE ALLOWED THEM TO RENEW THEIR POSITION. IS THAT BUT THE STATE ALLOWED THEM TO RENEW THEIR POSITION. IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? RENEW THEIR POSITION. IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? RENEW THEIR POSITION. IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? >> RENEW THEIR POSITION. IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? >> NO, RENEW THEIR POSITION. IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? >> NO, IT'S RENEW THEIR POSITION. IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? >> NO, IT'S NOT RENEW THEIR POSITION. IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? >> NO, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE. IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? >> NO, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE. IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? >> NO, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE. >> IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? >> NO, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE. >> Reporter: IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? >> NO, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE. >> Reporter: WE IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? >> NO, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE. >> Reporter: WE BEGAN >> NO, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE. >> Reporter: WE BEGAN >> NO, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE. >> Reporter: WE BEGAN INVESTIGATING >> NO, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE. >> Reporter: WE BEGAN INVESTIGATING AFTER >> NO, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE. >> Reporter: WE BEGAN INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS >> NO, IT'S NOT ACCEPTABLE. >> Reporter: WE BEGAN INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS HOME >> Reporter: WE BEGAN INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS HOME >> Reporter: WE BEGAN INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS HOME VALUED >> Reporter: WE BEGAN INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS HOME VALUED AT >> Reporter: WE BEGAN INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS HOME VALUED AT MORE >> Reporter: WE BEGAN INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS HOME VALUED AT MORE THAN >> Reporter: WE BEGAN INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS HOME VALUED AT MORE THAN $300,000 INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS HOME VALUED AT MORE THAN $300,000 INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS HOME VALUED AT MORE THAN $300,000 FRAUDULENTLY INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS HOME VALUED AT MORE THAN $300,000 FRAUDULENTLY SOLD INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS HOME VALUED AT MORE THAN $300,000 FRAUDULENTLY SOLD FOR INVESTIGATING AFTER THIS HOME VALUED AT MORE THAN $300,000 FRAUDULENTLY SOLD FOR JUST VALUED AT MORE THAN $300,000 FRAUDULENTLY SOLD FOR JUST VALUED AT MORE THAN $300,000 FRAUDULENTLY SOLD FOR JUST $9,000. FRAUDULENTLY SOLD FOR JUST $9,000. FRAUDULENTLY SOLD FOR JUST $9,000. +@ FRAUDULENTLY SOLD FOR JUST $9,000. YOU FRAUDULENTLY SOLD FOR JUST $9,000. YOU NEVER FRAUDULENTLY SOLD FOR JUST $9,000. YOU NEVER SOLD FRAUDULENTLY SOLD FOR JUST $9,000. YOU NEVER SOLD THIS FRAUDULENTLY SOLD FOR JUST $9,000. YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? $9,000. YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? $9,000. YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> $9,000. YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> NO, $9,000. YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> NO, I $9,000. YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> NO, I NEVER $9,000. YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> NO, I NEVER SOLD $9,000. YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS $9,000. YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. >> YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. >> Reporter: YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. >> Reporter: HE YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. >> Reporter: HE LIVES YOU NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE? >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN ATLANTA >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN ATLANTA AND >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN ATLANTA AND SAYS >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ >> NO, I NEVER SOLD THIS HOUSE. >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR FIRST >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR FIRST ALERTED >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR FIRST ALERTED HIM >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ >> Reporter: HE LIVES IN ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED VISITORS ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED VISITORS AT ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED VISITORS AT HIS ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED VISITORS AT HIS CHARLOTTE ATLANTA AND SAYS A+@ NEIGHBOR FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED VISITORS AT HIS CHARLOTTE HOME. FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED VISITORS AT HIS CHARLOTTE HOME. FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED VISITORS AT HIS CHARLOTTE HOME. THEN, FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED VISITORS AT HIS CHARLOTTE HOME. THEN, HE FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED VISITORS AT HIS CHARLOTTE HOME. THEN, HE LEARNED FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED VISITORS AT HIS CHARLOTTE HOME. THEN, HE LEARNED +@ABOUT FIRST ALERTED HIM TO+@ UNWANTED VISITORS AT HIS CHARLOTTE HOME. THEN, HE LEARNED +@ABOUT THE VISITORS AT HIS CHARLOTTE HOME. THEN, HE LEARNED +@ABOUT THE VISITORS AT HIS CHARLOTTE HOME. THEN, HE LEARNED +@ABOUT THE SHOCKING VISITORS AT HIS CHARLOTTE HOME. THEN, HE LEARNED +@ABOUT THE SHOCKING TRANSACTION. THEN, HE LEARNED +@ABOUT THE SHOCKING TRANSACTION. THEN, HE LEARNED +@ABOUT THE SHOCKING TRANSACTION. >> THEN, HE LEARNED +@ABOUT THE SHOCKING TRANSACTION. >> THAT THEN, HE LEARNED +@ABOUT THE SHOCKING TRANSACTION. >> THAT IS THEN, HE LEARNED +@ABOUT THE SHOCKING TRANSACTION. >> THAT IS NOT THEN, HE LEARNED +@ABOUT THE SHOCKING TRANSACTION. >> THAT IS NOT MY THEN, HE LEARNED +@ABOUT THE SHOCKING TRANSACTION. >> THAT IS NOT MY SIGNATURE. SHOCKING TRANSACTION. >> THAT IS NOT MY SIGNATURE. SHOCKING TRANSACTION. >> THAT IS NOT MY SIGNATURE. >> SHOCKING TRANSACTION. >> THAT IS NOT MY SIGNATURE. >> Reporter: SHOCKING TRANSACTION. >> THAT IS NOT MY SIGNATURE. >> Reporter: POLICE >> THAT IS NOT MY SIGNATURE. >> Reporter: POLICE >> THAT IS NOT MY SIGNATURE. >> Reporter: POLICE INVESTIGATING >> THAT IS NOT MY SIGNATURE. >> Reporter: POLICE INVESTIGATING +@A >> THAT IS NOT MY SIGNATURE. >> Reporter: POLICE INVESTIGATING +@A STRIKINGLY >> Reporter: POLICE INVESTIGATING +@A STRIKINGLY >> Reporter: POLICE INVESTIGATING +@A STRIKINGLY SIMILAR >> Reporter: POLICE INVESTIGATING +@A STRIKINGLY SIMILAR CRIME >> Reporter: POLICE INVESTIGATING +@A STRIKINGLY SIMILAR CRIME AT >> Reporter: POLICE INVESTIGATING +@A STRIKINGLY SIMILAR CRIME AT ANOTHER >> Reporter: POLICE INVESTIGATING +@A STRIKINGLY SIMILAR CRIME AT ANOTHER HOME INVESTIGATING +@A STRIKINGLY SIMILAR CRIME AT ANOTHER HOME INVESTIGATING +@A STRIKINGLY SIMILAR CRIME AT ANOTHER HOME IN INVESTIGATING +@A STRIKINGLY SIMILAR CRIME AT ANOTHER HOME IN THE INVESTIGATING +@A STRIKINGLY SIMILAR CRIME AT ANOTHER HOME IN THE SAME INVESTIGATING +@A STRIKINGLY SIMILAR CRIME AT ANOTHER HOME IN THE SAME NEIGHBORHOOD. SIMILAR CRIME AT ANOTHER HOME IN THE SAME NEIGHBORHOOD. SIMILAR CRIME AT ANOTHER HOME IN THE SAME NEIGHBORHOOD. GET SIMILAR CRIME AT ANOTHER HOME IN THE SAME NEIGHBORHOOD. GET THIS. IN THE SAME NEIGHBORHOOD. GET THIS. IN THE SAME NEIGHBORHOOD. GET THIS. IN IN THE SAME NEIGHBORHOOD. GET THIS. IN BOTH IN THE SAME NEIGHBORHOOD. GET THIS. IN BOTH CASES, IN THE SAME NEIGHBORHOOD. GET THIS. IN BOTH CASES, THE IN THE SAME NEIGHBORHOOD. GET THIS. IN BOTH CASES, THE NOTARY GET THIS. IN BOTH CASES, THE NOTARY GET THIS. IN BOTH CASES, THE NOTARY PUBLIC GET THIS. IN BOTH CASES, THE NOTARY PUBLIC STAMP GET THIS. IN BOTH CASES, THE NOTARY PUBLIC STAMP AND GET THIS. IN BOTH CASES, THE NOTARY PUBLIC STAMP AND SIGNATURE GET THIS. IN BOTH CASES, THE NOTARY PUBLIC STAMP AND SIGNATURE ARE IN BOTH CASES, THE NOTARY PUBLIC STAMP AND SIGNATURE ARE IN BOTH CASES, THE NOTARY PUBLIC STAMP AND SIGNATURE ARE THE IN BOTH CASES, THE NOTARY PUBLIC STAMP AND SIGNATURE ARE THE SAME. PUBLIC STAMP AND SIGNATURE ARE THE SAME. PUBLIC STAMP AND SIGNATURE ARE THE SAME. THE PUBLIC STAMP AND SIGNATURE ARE THE SAME. THE SECRETARY PUBLIC STAMP AND SIGNATURE ARE THE SAME. THE SECRETARY OF PUBLIC STAMP AND SIGNATURE ARE THE SAME. THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S PUBLIC STAMP AND SIGNATURE ARE THE SAME. THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE THE SAME. THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE THE SAME. THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE WOULD THE SAME. THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE WOULD NOT THE SAME. THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE WOULD NOT COMMENT THE SAME. THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE WOULD NOT COMMENT ON THE SAME. THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE WOULD NOT COMMENT ON WHETHER THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE WOULD NOT COMMENT ON WHETHER THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE WOULD NOT COMMENT ON WHETHER THAT THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE WOULD NOT COMMENT ON WHETHER THAT NOTARY THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE WOULD NOT COMMENT ON WHETHER THAT NOTARY IS THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE WOULD NOT COMMENT ON WHETHER THAT NOTARY IS UNDER WOULD NOT COMMENT ON WHETHER THAT NOTARY IS UNDER WOULD NOT COMMENT ON WHETHER THAT NOTARY IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, WOULD NOT COMMENT ON WHETHER THAT NOTARY IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, BUT WOULD NOT COMMENT ON WHETHER THAT NOTARY IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, BUT WE WOULD NOT COMMENT ON WHETHER THAT NOTARY IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THAT NOTARY IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THAT NOTARY IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THE THAT NOTARY IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THE NOTARY THAT NOTARY IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY THAT NOTARY IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED HER INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED HER POSITION INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED HER POSITION A INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED HER POSITION A MONTH INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER INVESTIGATION, BUT WE LEARNED THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE POLICE THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE POLICE REPORTS THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE POLICE REPORTS WERE THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RESIGNED HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE POLICE REPORTS WERE FILED. HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE POLICE REPORTS WERE FILED. HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE POLICE REPORTS WERE FILED. SHE HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE POLICE REPORTS WERE FILED. SHE HAS HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE POLICE REPORTS WERE FILED. SHE HAS SINCE HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE POLICE REPORTS WERE FILED. SHE HAS SINCE MOVED HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE POLICE REPORTS WERE FILED. SHE HAS SINCE MOVED OUT HER POSITION A MONTH AFTER THE POLICE REPORTS WERE FILED. SHE HAS SINCE MOVED OUT OF POLICE REPORTS WERE FILED. SHE HAS SINCE MOVED OUT OF POLICE REPORTS WERE FILED. SHE HAS SINCE MOVED OUT OF STATE. SHE HAS SINCE MOVED OUT OF STATE. SHE HAS SINCE MOVED OUT OF STATE. >> SHE HAS SINCE MOVED OUT OF STATE. >> I SHE HAS SINCE MOVED OUT OF STATE. >> I THINK SHE HAS SINCE MOVED OUT OF STATE. >> I THINK IT SHE HAS SINCE MOVED OUT OF STATE. >> I THINK IT WOULD SHE HAS SINCE MOVED OUT OF STATE. >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SHE HAS SINCE MOVED OUT OF STATE. >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. STATE. >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. STATE. >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. >> STATE. >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. >> Reporter: STATE. >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. >> Reporter: MICHAEL STATE. >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD STATE. >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS STATE. >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS A >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS A >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS A MEMBER >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS A MEMBER OF >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS A MEMBER OF THE >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS A MEMBER OF THE REAL >> I THINK IT WOULD BE SCARY. >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS A MEMBER OF THE REAL ESTATE >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS A MEMBER OF THE REAL ESTATE >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS A MEMBER OF THE REAL ESTATE LAWYER'S >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS A MEMBER OF THE REAL ESTATE LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS A MEMBER OF THE REAL ESTATE LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION OF >> Reporter: MICHAEL BIRD IS A MEMBER OF THE REAL ESTATE LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION OF NORTH MEMBER OF THE REAL ESTATE LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION OF NORTH MEMBER OF THE REAL ESTATE LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA. LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA. LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA. HE LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA. HE SAYS LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA. HE SAYS IT'S LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA. HE SAYS IT'S NOT LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA. HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA. HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO CAROLINA. HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO CAROLINA. HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO WOULD CAROLINA. HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO WOULD LEGALLY CAROLINA. HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO WOULD LEGALLY HAVE CAROLINA. HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS CAROLINA. HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HOME HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HOME IF HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HOME IF TWO HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HOME IF TWO SIDES HE SAYS IT'S NOT CLEAR WHO WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HOME IF TWO SIDES CLAIMED WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HOME IF TWO SIDES CLAIMED WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HOME IF TWO SIDES CLAIMED OWNERSHIP WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HOME IF TWO SIDES CLAIMED OWNERSHIP THAT WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HOME IF TWO SIDES CLAIMED OWNERSHIP THAT IS WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HOME IF TWO SIDES CLAIMED OWNERSHIP THAT IS UNTIL WOULD LEGALLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HOME IF TWO SIDES CLAIMED OWNERSHIP THAT IS UNTIL THE THE HOME IF TWO SIDES CLAIMED OWNERSHIP THAT IS UNTIL THE THE HOME IF TWO SIDES CLAIMED OWNERSHIP THAT IS UNTIL THE COURT THE HOME IF TWO SIDES CLAIMED OWNERSHIP THAT IS UNTIL THE COURT MAKES THE HOME IF TWO SIDES CLAIMED OWNERSHIP THAT IS UNTIL THE COURT MAKES A THE HOME IF TWO SIDES CLAIMED OWNERSHIP THAT IS UNTIL THE COURT MAKES A FINAL OWNERSHIP THAT IS UNTIL THE COURT MAKES A FINAL OWNERSHIP THAT IS UNTIL THE COURT MAKES A FINAL DETERMINATION. COURT MAKES A FINAL DETERMINATION. COURT MAKES A FINAL DETERMINATION. WE COURT MAKES A FINAL DETERMINATION. WE FOUND COURT MAKES A FINAL DETERMINATION. WE FOUND REGISTER COURT MAKES A FINAL DETERMINATION. WE FOUND REGISTER OF COURT MAKES A FINAL DETERMINATION. WE FOUND REGISTER OF DEEDS COURT MAKES A FINAL DETERMINATION. WE FOUND REGISTER OF DEEDS IN DETERMINATION. WE FOUND REGISTER OF DEEDS IN DETERMINATION. WE FOUND REGISTER OF DEEDS IN OTHER DETERMINATION. WE FOUND REGISTER OF DEEDS IN OTHER STATES DETERMINATION. WE FOUND REGISTER OF DEEDS IN OTHER STATES TAKE DETERMINATION. WE FOUND REGISTER OF DEEDS IN OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE WE FOUND REGISTER OF DEEDS IN OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE WE FOUND REGISTER OF DEEDS IN OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE STEPS WE FOUND REGISTER OF DEEDS IN OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE STEPS TO WE FOUND REGISTER OF DEEDS IN OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE STEPS TO PREVENT WE FOUND REGISTER OF DEEDS IN OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN THE OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN THE NASHVILLE OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE OTHER STATES TAKE PRO-ACTIVE STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS AN STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS AN ALERT STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS AN ALERT SYSTEM STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS AN ALERT SYSTEM IF STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A STEPS TO PREVENT FRAUD. IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A DOCUMENT IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A DOCUMENT IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A DOCUMENT IS IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A DOCUMENT IS FILED IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A DOCUMENT IS FILED WITH IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A DOCUMENT IS FILED WITH THEIR IN THE NASHVILLE AREA, THERE IS AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A DOCUMENT IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A DOCUMENT IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A DOCUMENT IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. SENATOR AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A DOCUMENT IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. SENATOR MARCUS AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A DOCUMENT IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY AN ALERT SYSTEM IF A DOCUMENT IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED A IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED A NEW IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED A NEW LAW IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED A NEW LAW THAT IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED A NEW LAW THAT TOOK IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IS FILED WITH THEIR NAMES. SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IN SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IN SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IN DECEMBER SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IN DECEMBER GIVING SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IN DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER SENATOR MARCUS ALREADY PROPOSED A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IN DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IN DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IN DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF DEEDS A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IN DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IN DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE THE A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IN DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY A NEW LAW THAT TOOK EFFECT IN DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY +@TO DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY +@TO DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY +@TO SCREEN DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY +@TO SCREEN FOR DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY +@TO SCREEN FOR FRAUD DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY +@TO SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD DECEMBER GIVING REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY +@TO SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD OF DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY +@TO SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD OF DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY +@TO SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD OF SIMPLY DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY +@TO SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD OF SIMPLY RUBBER DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY +@TO SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD OF SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DEEDS OFFICE THE AUTHORITY +@TO SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD OF SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD OF SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD OF SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. NOW SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD OF SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. NOW BECAUSE SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD OF SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. NOW BECAUSE OF SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD OF SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. NOW BECAUSE OF OUR SCREEN FOR FRAUD INSTEAD OF SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, THE SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, THE SENATOR SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, THE SENATOR SAYS SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, THE SENATOR SAYS SHE SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, THE SENATOR SAYS SHE IS SIMPLY RUBBER STAMP DOCUMENTS. NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, THE SENATOR SAYS SHE IS TURNING NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, THE SENATOR SAYS SHE IS TURNING NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, THE SENATOR SAYS SHE IS TURNING HER NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, THE SENATOR SAYS SHE IS TURNING HER ATTENTION NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, THE SENATOR SAYS SHE IS TURNING HER ATTENTION TO NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, THE SENATOR SAYS SHE IS TURNING HER ATTENTION TO NOTARY NOW BECAUSE OF OUR FINDINGS, THE SENATOR SAYS SHE IS TURNING HER ATTENTION TO NOTARY PUBLIC THE SENATOR SAYS SHE IS TURNING HER ATTENTION TO NOTARY PUBLIC THE SENATOR SAYS SHE IS TURNING HER ATTENTION TO NOTARY PUBLIC LAWS. HER ATTENTION TO NOTARY PUBLIC LAWS. HER ATTENTION TO NOTARY PUBLIC LAWS. >> HER ATTENTION TO NOTARY PUBLIC LAWS. >> I HER ATTENTION TO NOTARY PUBLIC LAWS. >> I WOULD HER ATTENTION TO NOTARY PUBLIC LAWS. >> I WOULD BE HER ATTENTION TO NOTARY PUBLIC LAWS. >> I WOULD BE HAPPY HER ATTENTION TO NOTARY PUBLIC LAWS. >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO HER ATTENTION TO NOTARY PUBLIC LAWS. >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO LOOK LAWS. >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO LOOK LAWS. >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO LOOK INTO LAWS. >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO LOOK INTO WHETHER LAWS. >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO LOOK INTO WHETHER WE LAWS. >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO LOOK INTO WHETHER WE NEED LAWS. >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO LOOK INTO WHETHER WE NEED TO LAWS. >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO LOOK INTO WHETHER WE NEED TO CHANGE >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO LOOK INTO WHETHER WE NEED TO CHANGE >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO LOOK INTO WHETHER WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO LOOK INTO WHETHER WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR LAWS. INTO WHETHER WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR LAWS. INTO WHETHER WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR LAWS. >> INTO WHETHER WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR LAWS. >> Reporter: INTO WHETHER WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR LAWS. >> Reporter: HE INTO WHETHER WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR LAWS. >> Reporter: HE HAS INTO WHETHER WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR LAWS. >> Reporter: HE HAS BEEN OUR LAWS. >> Reporter: HE HAS BEEN OUR LAWS. >> Reporter: HE HAS BEEN FIGHTING OUR LAWS. >> Reporter: HE HAS BEEN FIGHTING A OUR LAWS. >> Reporter: HE HAS BEEN FIGHTING A LEGAL OUR LAWS. >> Reporter: HE HAS BEEN FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE OUR LAWS. >> Reporter: HE HAS BEEN FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE TO >> Reporter: HE HAS BEEN FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE TO >> Reporter: HE HAS BEEN FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE TO OFFICIALLY >> Reporter: HE HAS BEEN FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE TO OFFICIALLY RECLAIM >> Reporter: HE HAS BEEN FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE TO OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP >> Reporter: HE HAS BEEN FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE TO OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE TO OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE TO OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE TO OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS HOME FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE TO OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS HOME IN FIGHTING A LEGAL BATTLE TO OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS HOME IN COURT. OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS HOME IN COURT. OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS HOME IN COURT. AS OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE NOTARY OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE NOTARY IN OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE, OFFICIALLY RECLAIM OWNERSHIP OF HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE TOLD HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE TOLD ME HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HIS HOME IN COURT. AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER SIGNATURE AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER SIGNATURE TOO AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER SIGNATURE TOO AND AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS AS FOR THE NOTARY IN THAT CASE,@ SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS SHE SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS SHE SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS SHE DOESN'T SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS SHE DOESN'T KNOW SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS SHE DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS SHE DOESN'T KNOW HOW SOMEONE SHE TOLD ME SOMEONE FORGED HER SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS SHE DOESN'T KNOW HOW SOMEONE GOT SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS SHE DOESN'T KNOW HOW SOMEONE GOT SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS SHE DOESN'T KNOW HOW SOMEONE GOT AHOLD SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS SHE DOESN'T KNOW HOW SOMEONE GOT AHOLD OF SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS SHE DOESN'T KNOW HOW SOMEONE GOT AHOLD OF HER SIGNATURE TOO AND SHE SAYS SHE DOESN'T KNOW HOW SOMEONE GOT AHOLD OF HER STAMP.

Read more
be ready to get more

Get legally-binding signatures now!