Unlock the Power of Online Signature Lawfulness for Polygraph Consent in Australia

How to eSign a document: online signature lawfulness for Polygraph Consent in Australia

the federal government's deeply flawed misinformation laws must be abandoned in light of new IPA research revealing the entrenched bias of Australia's so-called factchecking organizations under these proposed new laws social media companies must censor misinformation to the satisfaction of a government agency or face huge fines a secret letter from the communications minister to the Prime Minister has revealed that factchecking organizations will enforce the government's new censorship sh rules this will give fact Checkers enormous power in determining what mainstream Australians will be allowed to say online the IPA has analyzed 970 factchecking investigations dating back to January 2019 the research shows that Australia's main fact Checkers are consistently biased and disproportionately Target critics of government policy and right of Center views the research found that when the fact Checkers investigated comments made by Australian polic politicians 65% of the time their verdicts favored the political left this is a huge 2:1 disparity we also analyzed how the fact Checkers approached policy debates like the responses to the covid-19 pandemic and climate change policy and overwhelming 94% of the factchecking investigations about covid-19 targeted critics of the official response to the pandemic in the case of climate change 81% of factchecking Investigations Target Skeptics of the climate change agenda rmit fact lab has never fact checked a single claim made by an advocate of covid-19 or climate change policy not a single one this means that the government was never held to account during the pandemic for its dubious claims of following the science it also means that climate change activists are never scrutinized in the same way that critics of this agenda are a key principle of the international factchecking Network work the private factchecking accreditation body is that signatures commit to nonpartisanship and fairness and to not concentrate their factchecking unduly on any one side our research proves that this is clearly not the case in Australia rather the fact Checkers are activist organizations pushing their own political agendas if these organizations are empowered to Define what constitutes misinformation they will only censor critics of official government policies and the center right the government's proposed misinformation and disinformation laws are the single biggest attack on freedom of speech in Australia's peacetime history and have no place in a liberal democracy like Australia if you would like to know more about the ipa's research visit our website at ipa. org.