IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI,
DIVISION
PLAINTIFF
V. CIVIL ACTION NO.:
DEFENDANTS
ANSWER AND DEFENSES
, by and through undersigned counsel, file this his/her/their Answer and Defenses to
Plaintiff's Complaint, and in support hereof show this Court as follows:
FIRST DEFENSE
The Complaint fails to state a claim against the Defendants upon which relief may be
granted.
SECOND DEFENSE
MOTION TO DISMISS
The allegations of paragraphs 34 through 41, including the paragraphs referenced in
paragraph 34 of the Complaint upon which said allegations relate or rely, are due to be dismissed
in that said allegations are barred by the applicable statute of limitation. Said allegations
constituting the only purported cause of action against Defendant, , individually, Defendant,
, individually is due to be dismissed from this action with prejudice.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendants move that all allegations
contained in paragraphs through , including the paragraphs referenced in paragraph
of the Complaint be dismissed with prejudice, with all costs assessed to Plaintiff.
THIRD DEFENSE
Defendants deny each and every material allegation of the Complaint by which Plaintiff
seeks to impose liability upon the Defendants in any manner whatsoever.
FOURTH DEFENSE
MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendant, , bears no individual responsibility for any of the allegations contained in
the Complaint, as he/she was at all times material hereto acting in his/her capacity as an officer
of Defendant, , and executed the purported contract and related attachments, which are the
subject of the instant litigation, in his/her capacity as President of Defendant, , rather than
individually.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant, , moves this Court to
Dismiss his/her , individually, from this action with prejudice with All costs assessed to Plaintiff.
FIFTH DEFENSE
While denying each and every material allegation of the Complaint by which Plaintiff
seeks to impose liability upon Defendant, , should it be shown at the trial of this matter that
Defendant, , breached the contract between Plaintiff and Defendant, , then Defendant, ,
respectfully demands that any award of damages for such breach be reduced by the amount
attributable to Plaintiff's failure to mitigate its damages, if any.
SIXTH DEFENSE
While denying each and every material allegation of the Complaint by which Plaintiff
seeks to impose liability on the Defendants in any manner whatsoever, should it be determined
that Defendants acted in a manner which is compensable to Plaintiff, then Plaintiff's damages, if
any, should be reduced by that amount of damages attributable to Plaintiff's own contributory
negligence.
SEVENTH DEFENSE
While denying each and every material allegation of the Complaint by which Plaintiff
seeks to impose liability on the Defendants in any manner whatsoever, Defendants affirmatively
plead that Plaintiffs failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract which is the
subject of this litigation and cannot now be heard to complain about Defendant, , alleged
breach of same.
EIGHTH DEFENSE
The allegations of paragraphs through of the Complaint being grounded
and contingent upon the validity and enforceability of the contract made the basis of this action,
and the Plaintiff having failed to comply with the terms and conditions of said contract, said
allegations are due to be dismissed with prejudice.
NINTH DEFENSE
The allegations of paragraphs through of the Complaint being grounded
and contingent upon the validity and enforceability of the contract made the basis of this action,
and the Plaintiff having failed to comply with the terms and conditions of said contract, said
allegations are due to be dismissed with prejudice.
TENTH DEFENSE
The allegations of paragraphs through of the Complaint being grounded
and contingent upon the validity and enforceability of the contract made the basis of this action,
and the Plaintiff having failed to comply with the terms and conditions of said contract, said
allegations are due to be dismissed with prejudice.
ELEVENTH DEFENSE
The allegations of paragraphs through of the Complaint being grounded
and contingent upon the validity and enforceability of the contract made the basis of this action,
and the Plaintiff having failed to comply with the terms and conditions of said contract, said
allegations are due to be dismissed with prejudice.
TWELFTH DEFENSE
The allegations of paragraphs through of the Complaint being grounded
and contingent upon the validity and enforceability of the contract made the basis of this action,
and the Plaintiff having failed to comply with the terms and conditions of said contract, said
allegations are due to be dismissed with prejudice.
THIRTEENTH DEFENSE
Answering the allegations paragraph by paragraph, the Defendants, either collectively or
individually as appropriate, allege and state as follows:
1. .
2.
3. .
4. .
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
FOURTEENTH DEFENSE
The Plaintiff, by and through its agents, employees or assigns, counseled, recommended
and induced the Defendant, , to break its contract with another entity and competitor of
Defendant, , and for the purpose of establishing an adhesion contract and overbearing
relationship with Defendant, . Rather than comply with Plaintiff's illegal, unethical and
violative request, Defendant, , continued to honor its contract with the Plaintiff's competitor
while using its best efforts to satisfy the contract made the basis of Plaintiff's Complaint.
Plaintiff's actions, as described above, provides proof of Plaintiff's "unclean hands" in the
circumstance. Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled to no relief whatsoever of and from the
Defendants.
FIFTEENTH DEFENSE
Although having previously denied that the Plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages or
any relief whatsoever against Defendants, Defendants affirmatively plead that:
(A) Plaintiff's Complaint fails to allege facts or circumstances sufficient to
support an award of punitive damages under applicable law.
(B) An award of punitive damages in this civil action would amount to a
deprivation of property without due process of law in violation of the fifth and fourteenth
Amendments to the United States Constitution and Section 14 of the Mississippi Constitution;
(C) No legislation has been enacted authorizing punitive damages in a civil
action such as this or placing any limit on the amount of punitive damages awardable;
(D) An award of punitive damages in this civil action would violate the due
process provisions of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution
and Section 14 of the Mississippi Constitution;
(E) The criteria used for determining whether and in what amount punitive
damages may be awarded are impermissibly vague, imprecise and inconsistent and are therefore
in violation of the due process provisions of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United
States Constitution;
(F) An award of punitive damages in this civil action would amount to an
excessive fine in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and of
Section 28 of the Mississippi Constitution;
(G) An award of punitive damages in this civil action would violate the equal
protection provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in that
such a sanction is discriminatory and arbitrary in penalizing the Defendants on the basis of
assets;
(H) To the extent that Defendants are subjected to a criminal sanction through
punitive damages, the burden of proof required to impose the same should be proved "beyond a
reasonable doubt," and punitive damages should not be awarded without affording the
Defendants the full range of criminal procedural safeguards afforded pursuant to the Fourth,
Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution;
(I) An award of punitive damages in this civil action would violate Article I,
Section X of the United States Constitution;
(J) An award of punitive damages in this civil action would violate similar
and related provisions, as noted above, of the Constitution of the State of Mississippi.
SIXTEENTH DEFENSE
MOTION TO BIFURCATE
Defendants, by and through undersigned counsel, files this their Motion to Bifurcate the
punitive damages issues from the claims for compensatory damages pursuant to Miss. Code
Ann. § 11-1-65(b) and (c) (1972), as amended, and in support hereof show this Court as follows:
1.
Plaintiff has made a separate claim against Defendants for alleged conduct which,
Plaintiff alleges, gives rise to the imposition of punitive damages against Defendants.
2.
Pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 11-1-65(b) and (c), Defendants are entitled to a separate
evidentiary hearing on the punitive damages issue, which said hearing should be commenced if,
but only if, an award of compensatory damages has been made against Defendants.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendants pray this Court will bifurcate
the punitive damages issues from the underlying compensatory damages claims by deferring any
address of punitive damages issues until a determination has been made as to Plaintiff's claims
for compensatory damages.
SEVENTEENTH DEFENSE
The facts not having been fully developed, Defendants further affirmatively plead the
following affirmative defenses as may be applicable in this action: Plaintiffs' failure to mitigate
damages or take reasonable steps to avoid damages, accord and satisfaction, arbitration and
award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel,
failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, injury by fellow servant, laches, license, payment,
release, res judicata , statute of frauds, statute of limitations, waiver, and any other matter
constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense.
AND NOW HAVING FULLY AND FINALLY answered the allegations of the
Complaint, Defendants respectfully demand that they be dismissed from this action with all costs
taxed to Plaintiff.
_______________________________________
,
INDIVIDUALLY
BY: __________________________________________
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
OF COUNSEL :
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that, , I have this day served a true and correct copy of the foregoing
via facsimile transmission and via U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid and properly addressed to:
This the day , .
__________________________________________