Fill and Sign the Law 258 13 Spring Syllabus Berkeley Law University of California Form

Transmutation or Postnuptial Agreement to Convert Community Property into Separate Property Agreement made on the _________________ (date), between ____________________ (Name of Husband) of _________________________________________________________ ________________ (street address, city, county, state, zip code), referred to herein as Husband, and ___________________ (Name of Wife), of _____________________________ ____________________________________________ (street address, city, county, state, zip code), referred to herein as Wife. Whereas, there now stands in the name of Husband _____ (number) shares of __________________ (common or preferred) stock of __________________________ (name of corporation), a _________________ (name of state) corporation, evidenced by certificates of stock numbers: _______ (number) through ______ (number); and Whereas, the corporate stock referred to is community property of the parties, and the parties desire and intend that the stock shall be equally divided between them so that each shall hold one-half of the stock as his or her separate property. 1. Conveyance by HusbandHusband by this instrument assigns, transfers, and conveys to Wife _____ (number) shares of such stock, to be held by her as her separate property. 2. Conveyance by WifeWife by this instrument assigns, transfers, and releases to Husband all of her community interest in the remaining _____ (number) shares of such stock, to be held by him as his separate property. Witness our signatures, this the ________________ (date). _____________________________ ___________________________ (Printed Name of Husband) (Printed Name of Wife) _____________________________ ___________________________ (Signature of Husband) (Signature of Wife) (Acknowledgment form may vary by state)
(acknowledgment form may vary by state)<|endowment|>a former federal prosecutor who worked on the prosecution of the CIA officer accused of leaking the name of a covert agent to the press has defended the agency's actions for the past five years. "even when i was assistant attorney at CIA [under president george w. Bush], i went through an exhaustive and painstaking three-year review of the facts and the law, and was convinced that what CIA director george tenet did was perfectly legal,” said ken waxman, who served as acting attorney for the eastern district of virginia from june 2002 to february 2003. Advertisement waxman, an adjunct law professor at american university, said that the CIA's action was appropriate in light of the public revelation that Valerie plame wilson had covertly been working for a private intelligence network when she reported to work at the state department in 2003. Since then, the plame leak has become a major issue in the presidential campaign. Republican candidate Mitt Romney's foreign policy adviser was indicted last month for allegedly telling fellow citizens that place was likely a russian agent, and that the leaks from the place case are a deliberate attempt to bring the cia and the administration down. But the obama administration has defended itself against the charges against Condoleezza Rice, a former secretary of state. When place was revealed to have been a cia officer during the bush years, some republicans, including sen. John McCain john sidney mccainsteve schmidt: graham has been 'corrupted by ambition' how the Trump tax law passed: gop adds sweeteners Chris wallace: ford's testimony is 'a disaster for the republicans' more (Ariz.), argued that the action against her was over-the-top, and an example of the administration "coddling" a rogue spy. Waxman, now a visiting professor at american university, said that the case against the intelligence officer who leaked plame's name to the press was very weak. The cia officer, who has not been identified publicly, said that he was acting under orders from his superiors to leak the report. "i don't know any senior analyst working at CIA [at that time] that would make these kinds of decisions, particularly where you're talking about exposing sources and methods on this scale, without very direct instructions from somewhere," waxman said. Waxman, who recently appeared as an expert witness