Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Walker v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Civil Action No. 416 CV 01388

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Interpleader Action

IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

FORMERLY KNOWN AS

VS. NO.

THE ESTATES OF, AND

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INTERPLEADER ACTION

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, , pursuant to Rules 57 and 22 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, and files this, its Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Interpleader Action against the Defendants, the Estate of , and (collectively referred to as the “Defendants”) and in support hereof would show as follows:

1.

(“Plaintiff”) is a Mississippi corporation, formerly known as whose principal office is located at , , County, Mississippi .

2.

The Defendants are residents of County, Mississippi, whose address is , , Mississippi . Process may be served on these Defendants at such residence address.

3.

Jurisdiction and venue are proper in County pursuant to MCA § 11-11-3 and 11-11-7 as the county of Plaintiff’s principal office and the county where the cause of action occurred or accrued.

4.

On or about , Mr./Mrs. purchased industrial life insurance Policy No. in the face value of $. Attached as Exhibit “A” is a copy of Mr./Mrs. insurance policy application. Attached as Exhibit “B” is a copy of insurance Policy No. . Attached as Exhibit “C” is a copy of Plan 920 brochure. Attached as Exhibit “D” is a copy of a funeral home merchandise and service letter dated . Attached as Exhibit “E” is a copy of Paid-Up Policy Certificate No. showing that the premiums on Policy No. were paid up in full on .

5.

On or about , , husband/wife of Defendant Mr./Ms. , purchased industrial life insurance Policy No. in the face value of $. A copy of the life insurance policy application is attached as Exhibit “F”. A copy of the life insurance policy, Plan 920 brochure, funeral home merchandise and service letter and Paid-Up Policy Certificate have not been provided by Defendants, although Plaintiff believes the documents are similar to those of Exhibits “B” through “E” for .

6.

On or about , , daughter/son of Defendants Mr./Ms. and Mr./Ms. , purchased industrial life insurance Policy No. in the face value of $. A copy of ’s insurance policy application form is attached as Exhibit “G”. A copy of the life insurance policy, Plan 920 brochure, funeral home merchandise and service letter, and Paid-Up Policy Certificate have not been provided by the Defendants, although Plaintiff believes that the documents are similar to those of Exhibits “B” through “E” for .

7.

On information and belief, Mr./Ms. died on . Proof of death has not been provided to Plaintiff.

REQUEST FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF

8.

Issues have arisen between the Plaintiff and Defendants concerning the rights, duties and obligations of the respective parties pursuant to the insurance policies and documentation attached as exhibits to this Complaint. The Court is requested to declare the rights, status or other legal relations under such documents.

9.

In , Mr./Ms. got into the funeral home business by purchasing several funeral homes from the family. All of the funeral homes included in the various funeral home names. Several years later, Mr./Ms. organized , which provided industrial life insurance policies. In the early 's, Mr./Ms. concentrated his/her efforts on and sold his/her funeral home companies. Most of the funeral homes, either immediately or over time, have dropped the name . All of the funeral homes are presently operating.

10.

Funeral homes often provide pre-need arrangements to its customers. There are various forms of pre-need funeral planning. Some plans include life insurance to fund a portion of the funeral home obligation.

11.

The ’s pre-need funeral arrangements involved funeral home merchandise and service agreement funded in part by life insurance. The each purchased a life insurance policy and the funeral home group guaranteed that it would provide certain merchandise and services in exchange for an assignment of the proceeds of the life insurance policy. In such an arrangement, provides a life insurance policy and the funeral home provides certain funeral merchandise and services set forth in the Plan brochure and letter. Under the arrangement, is obligated to pay the face value of the life insurance policy. The funeral home is obligated to provide certain merchandise and services in exchange for an assignment of the life insurance proceeds.

12.

The life insurance policy attached as Exhibit “B” is an industrial life insurance policy with an insured sum of $. The policy provisions clearly set forth the conditions under which the policy proceeds are payable. There are no provisions in the policy concerning the payment of funeral merchandise or services. The only obligation of under the insurance policy is to pay the sum insured.

13.

The funeral home merchandise and service letter attached as Exhibit “D” informs Mr./Ms. that Funeral Homes, or any Funeral Director under contract with , will furnish a upon surrender (assignment) of Policy proceeds to the funeral home. The letter informs Mr./Ms. that he/she has a choice of specific funeral homes who will provide the specified merchandise and services in exchange for the policy proceeds. There is no language in the letter that provides that the insurance policy is for the full value of any funeral or for the merchandise or services identified in the letter. There is no language in the letter indicating that the specified funeral merchandise and services are available at any funeral home other than the specified funeral homes.

14.

The brochure attached as Exhibit “C” further discusses the Plan 920, which identifies the burial plan as a combination of a life insurance policy and funeral home agreement to provide the policyholder with certain funeral merchandise and services at specified funeral homes. The brochure lists the Funeral Homes and the Funeral Directors under contract with on the date the policy was issued. The brochure identifies funeral homes in , , , , , , and . There is no language in the brochure that indicates that the insured is entitled to the specified funeral merchandise and services at any other funeral home.

15.

On , Defendants' counsel informed the , Mississippi, office of that Mr./Ms. died that morning. Mr./Ms. ’s counsel was informed that Mr./Ms. had a $ insurance policy, which would be paid as directed by the beneficiary. Defendants' counsel was further informed that the funeral home merchandise and service letter was an obligation of a funeral home committed to provide the services. Names and addresses of funeral homes in , and , who would honor the merchandise and services letters in exchange for an assignment of the life insurance policy proceeds, were identified by name and address. Attached as Exhibit "H" is a copy of a letter from the ’s counsel verifying that the Defendants were informed of funeral homes that would honor the merchandise and service letter in exchange for an assignment of the life insurance policy proceeds.

16.

17.

18.

19.

A bona fide justifiable issue exists between the parties.

20.

Based on the foregoing, it is requested that this Court declare the following matters:

A. Whether or not the only obligation of is to pay the insured sum under the insurance policy.

B. Whether or not the Plan 920 brochure creates an obligation for to guarantee/insure that each of the funeral homes identified in the brochure will provide the specified merchandise and services for no further charge to the policyholder or policy beneficiary.

C. Whether or not the Plan 920 brochure creates an obligation for to provide reimbursement/insurance for the entire cost of the specified merchandise and services provided by a funeral home not identified in the brochure.

D. Whether or not satisfies any obligation it may have pursuant to the Plan 920 brochure by informing the policyholder or policy beneficiary of the funeral homes that it is aware of at the time of inquiry or death that will provide the specified funeral merchandise and services in exchange for an assignment of the life insurance policy.

E. Whether or not the funeral merchandise and services letter creates an obligation for to guarantee/insure that each of the funeral homes identified in the letter will provide the specified funeral merchandise and services for no further charge to the policyholder or policy beneficiary.

F. Whether or not the funeral merchandise and services letter creates an obligation for to provide reimbursement/insurance for the entire cost of the specified funeral merchandise and services provided by a funeral home not identified in the letter.

G. Whether or not satisfies any obligation it may have pursuant to the funeral merchandise and services letter by informing the policyholder or policy beneficiary of the funeral homes that it is aware of at the time of inquiry or death that will provide the specified funeral merchandise and services in exchange for an assignment of the life insurance policy.

H. Whether or not the Defendants waived their rights under the Plan 920 and funeral home merchandise and services letter by choosing a non-participating funeral home. This issue is directed solely to the funeral merchandise and services. Plaintiff does not contest, and has not contested, that the $ insured sum under the policy is payable as directed by the policy beneficiary.

I. Whether or not the Defendants waived their rights under the Plan 920 and funeral home merchandise and services letter by procuring merchandise and/or services different from that provided in the Plan and letter. (This issue is directed solely to the funeral merchandise and services. Plaintiff does not contest, and has not contested, that the $ insured sum under the policy is payable as directed by the policy beneficiary.)

INTERPLEADER ACTION

21.

The Plaintiff does not contest, and has not contested, that the $ insured sum provided under life insurance Policy No. is payable as directed by the beneficiary, Mr./Ms. .

22.

To date, Mr./Ms. , as beneficiary of Mr./Ms. ’s policy, has not requested policy payment, provided a copy of the Death Certificate or other information necessary to process and pay a claim. Such proof of death is required by the insurance policy and recommended by the Mississippi Insurance Department.

23.

Subject only to Defendants providing satisfactory proof of death, Plaintiff interpleads into the Registry of the Court the sum of $ as payment of the policy proceeds for insurance Policy No. .

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff requests that this Court declare the items specified in section 20 of this Complaint and that the Court disburse the interplead funds in accordance to the policy provisions and applicable law. The Plaintiff requests further, other and different relief as is reasonable and proper in the premises.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________________

Attorney for

Of counsel:

Telephone:

MSB #

Attorney for

Enter text

What this case caption represents

Walker v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Civil Action No. 416 CV 01388 is a federal civil lawsuit caption used to identify a specific district court matter between an individual plaintiff and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. This guide explains what this case caption represents, which filings are commonly associated with insurance coverage disputes, and how parties typically manage pleadings, service, and court deadlines. It is intended to clarify procedural steps, required data elements, and options for electronic signing and submission of documents related to this civil action.

Why accurate handling matters for this civil action

Understanding the Walker v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Civil Action No. 416 CV 01388 helps parties and counsel meet procedural requirements, reduce filing errors, and preserve evidence; it also clarifies when electronic signatures and e-filing are permissible under ESIGN, UETA, and local court rules.

Why accurate handling matters for this civil action

Who typically prepares or signs documents in this matter

Typical users include plaintiffs, defense counsel, insurance claims teams, and court clerks involved with this civil action.

  • Plaintiffs and their attorneys preparing pleadings, affidavits, and discovery requests.
  • Defense teams at Liberty Mutual handling responses, coverage positions, and document production.
  • Court clerks and court systems processing filings, dockets, and service notices.

Use this guidance to coordinate filing logistics, ensure document accuracy, and adopt compliant eSignature practices aligned with court rules.

Core components to include on each filing

Primary components of filings in Walker v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Civil Action No. 416 CV 01388 include procedural covers, factual statements, evidence exhibits, and signature blocks.

Caption

Use the exact case caption shown: Walker v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Civil Action No. 416 CV 01388 on every pleading to ensure proper docketing and court processing.

Parties

List full legal names for plaintiff(s) and defendant(s), including corporate identifiers and counsel contact information for service and correspondence purposes, and identify primary counsel with bar numbers and addresses.

Claims

Summarize causes of action and legal theories concisely, referencing statutes or policy provisions at issue and stating the relief sought in specific terms, including damages or declaratory relief requested.

Exhibits

Attach numbered exhibits with exhibit coversheets; cite exhibit numbers in the body and ensure each attachment is legible, bookmarked, and referenced in the exhibit index.

Service

Provide proof of service or certificate of service showing how and when parties were served; include email delivery, hand service, or process server details and any attempted service logs.

Signatures

All attorneys or authorized representatives must sign pleadings using their typed name, bar number, firm address, and a signature line; eSignatures follow ESIGN/UETA standards and include date of signature.

Required document details at a glance

Case Caption: Exact caption as filed.
Docket Number: Include court docket number.
Party Names: Full legal names, no abbreviations.
Counsel Details: Attorney name, bar number, address.
Service Method: Method and date of service.
Signatory Info: Name, title, signature date.

Step-by-step: preparing and filing a pleading

Follow these sequential steps to prepare and file court documents in the Walker civil action.

  • 01
    Prepare Draft: Draft pleading with correct caption and exhibits attached.
  • 02
    Review: Confirm legal theories, citations, and service details.
  • 03
    Sign: Authorizing attorney signs and dates the document.
  • 04
    File: File via court e-filing or deliver to clerk per rules.

How to configure e-filing and eSignature settings

Configure your e-filing and electronic signature workflow to match court requirements and internal approval routing.

Field Configuration
Signature Authentication Use email link, SMS code, or multi-factor.
Document Format Upload PDF/A-compatible, flattened exhibits preferred.
Template Fields Add signature, date, and exhibit reference fields.
Retention Setting Enable automatic archival and audit trail retention.

Typical eSubmission flow for pleadings and signatures

Typical eSubmission flow for filings and signed documents in this civil action, showing routing and confirmation steps.

  • Upload: Attach pleadings and exhibits as single PDF.
  • Place Fields: Add signature, date, and checkbox fields for signers.
  • Invite Signers: Send secure signing links with authentication options.
  • Complete: Signed copies and audit trail are issued to parties.

Essential deadlines and scheduling considerations

Key filing and service deadlines to monitor for this civil action vary by court and docket schedule.

Initial Complaint Deadline:

Follow the court-issued scheduling order for deadline dates.

Service of Process Deadline:

Serve defendant within the time specified by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.

Discovery Scheduling Dates:

Comply with court's initial disclosure and discovery deadlines.

Motion Deadlines and Responses:

File motions and serve responses within local rule timeframes.

Trial and Hearing Dates:

Confirm dates on the docket and calendar with the clerk.

Common pitfalls to avoid

  • Incorrect captioning or docket number that causes pleadings to be misfiled or delayed, creating additional administrative burdens and potential missed deadlines.
  • Failing to attach required exhibits or using unsecured file formats that lead to rejected e-filings or requests to refile attachments.
  • Mismatched signatory names or missing bar numbers on attorney signatures, which can invalidate filings or require corrective filings.
  • Relying on unsupported eSignature methods where consumer disclosures or stronger authentication are required under ESIGN or local court rules.

Consequences of incorrect or incomplete filings

Default Risk: Entry of default judgment.
Sanctions: Monetary or evidentiary sanctions.
Strike Pleadings: Defective filings can be struck.
Delay: Case progress is delayed.
Fee Exposure: Additional court filing fees.
Compliance Breach: HIPAA or discovery violations.

Pricing and feature snapshot for common eSignature vendors

Annual pricing and feature comparison for common eSignature vendors to consider for court-related document workflows.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day trial Varies Varies Varies Varies
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies Varies Varies

Technical integrations and file format considerations

Technical integrations and file format requirements for electronic submission and signature of litigation documents must be confirmed with court and vendor settings.

  • Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace
  • File Types: PDF, Word DOCX, and scanned TIFF supported
  • Authentication: Email link, SMS code, or stronger MFA

Frequently asked questions for filings and signatures

Answers to frequent questions about filing, eSign validity, service, and document retention in Walker v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Civil Action No. 416 CV 01388.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users