How To Sign Nebraska Banking Form

Vt act 250 disclosure statement 2008 form

Jacob: Welcome to Crash Course Economics. My name is Jacob Clifford.Adrienne: And I'm Adrienne Hill. And today we're going to do something a little different.We're going to explore one moment in history in depth. We're going to talk about how the2008 Financial Crisis happened and the government response to it in the United States.Jacob: So let's get started. Theme Music Jacob: The 2008 Financial Crisis was a big deal. Ben Bernanke said it could have resultedin a 1930s style global financial and economic meltdown with catastrophic implications. Butwhat happened? Why did it happen? And why aren't we all huddled around burning trashcans forming a raiding party to go steal gas from other tribes in the wasteland?By the way, if you're actually doing that, you probably didn't hear we survived the financialcrisis. Things got better. Seriously. Put down your crossbows.Adrienne: To explain what happened, first we have to do a quick explainer about mortgages.And you might already know this, but basically someone that wants to buy a house will oftenborrow hundreds of thousands of dollars from a bank. In return, the bank gets a piece ofpaper, called a mortgage.Every month, the homeowner has to pay back a portion of the principle, plus interest,to whomever holds the piece of paper. If they stop paying, that's called a default. Andwhomever holds that piece of paper gets the house.The reason I'm saying whomever holds the paper, rather than the bank, is because the bank,the original lender, often sells that mortgage to some third party. And the reason I sayoften is because this happens all the time. I've had my house for nine months, and threedifferent banks have had the mortgage.Traditionally, it was pretty hard to get a mortgage if you had bad credit or didn't havea steady job. Lenders just didn't want to take the risk that you might "default" onyour loan, but all that started to change in the 2000s.And before we go further, a quick aside here. The story gets complicated fast, and it'sa fascinating story. But we're trying to keep it relatively simple. So, I've asked Stan ifwe could put some additional resources in the YouTube description. And Stan said "Yes." Thanks Stan!Anyway, back to our story. In the 2000s, investors in the U.S. and abroad looking for a low risk,high return investment started throwing their money at the U.S. housing market. The thinkingwas they could get a better return from the interest rates home owners paid on mortgages,than they could by investing in things like Treasury Bonds, which were paying very, very low interest.But big money, global investors didn't want to just buy up my mortgage, and Stan's mortgage.It's too much hassle to deal with us as individuals. I mean, we're pains. Instead, they boughtinvestments called mortgage backed-securities. Mortgage backed-securities are created whenlarge financial institutions securitize mortgages. Basically, they buy up thousands of individualmortgages, bundle them together, and sell shares of that pool to investors.Investors gobbled these mortgage backed-securities up. Again, they paid a higher rate of returnthan investors could get in other places and they looked like really safe bets. For one,home prices were going up and up. So lenders thought, worse case scenario, the borrowerdefaults on the mortgage, we can just sell the house for more money.At the same time, credit ratings agencies were telling investors these mortgage backed-securitieswere safe investments. They gave a lot of these mortgage backed-securities AAA Ratings--thebest of the best. And back when mortgages were only for borrowers with good credit,mortgage debt was a good investment.Anyway, investors were desperate to buy more and more and more of these securities. So,lenders did their best to help create more of them. But to create more of them, theyneeded more mortgages. So lenders loosened their standards and made loans to people withlow income and poor credit. You'll hear these called sub-prime mortgages.Eventually, some institutions even started using what are called predatory ending practicesto generate mortgages. They made loans without verifying income and offered absurd, adjustablerate mortgages with payments people could afford at first, but quickly ballooned beyond their means.But these new sub-prime lending practices were brand new. That meant credit agenciescould still point to historical data that indicated mortgage debt was a safe bet. Butit wasn't. These investments were becoming less and less safe all the time. But investorstrusted the ratings, and kept pouring in their money.Traders also started selling an even riskier product, called collateralized debt obligations,or CDOs. And again, some of these investments were given the highest credit ratings fromthe ratings agencies, even though many of them were made up of these incredibly risky loans.While, the investors and traders and bankers were throwing money into the U.S. housingmarket, the U.S. price of homes was going up and up and up. The new lax lending requirementsand low interest rates drove housing prices higher, which only made the mortgage backedsecurities and CDOs seem like an even better investment. If the borrowers defaulted, thebank would still have this super valuable house, right? No. Wrong. Let's go to the Thought Bubble.Actually, let's go to the Housing Bubble. You remember bubbles, right? Rapid increases,driven by irrational decisions. Well, this was a bubble, and bubbles have an annoyingtendency to burst. And this one did. People just couldn't pay for their incredibly expensivehouses, or keep up with their ballooning mortgage payments.Borrowers started defaulting, which put more houses back on the market for sale. But thereweren't buyers. So supply was up, demand was down, and home prices started collapsing.As prices fell, some borrowers suddenly had a mortgage for way more than their home wascurrently worth. Some stopped paying. That led to more defaults, pushing prices down further.As this was happening, the big financial institutions stopped buying sub-prime mortgages and sub-primelenders were getting stuck with bad loans. By 2007, some really big lenders had declaredbankruptcy. The problems spread to the big investors, who'd poured money into these mortgagebacked securities and CDOs. And they started losing money on their investments. A bunchof money. But wait. There's more.There was another financial instrument that financial institutions had on their booksthat exacerbated all of these problems--unregulated, over-the-counter derivatives, including somethingcalled credit default swaps, that were basically sold as insurance against mortgage backed securities.Does AIG ring a bell? It sold tens of millions of dollars of these insurance policies, withoutmoney to back them up when things went wrong. And as we mentioned, things went terriblywrong. These credit default swaps were also turned into other securities -- that essentially allowedtraders to bet huge amounts of money on whether the values of mortgage securities would go up or down.All these bets, these financial instruments, resulted in an incredibly complicated webof assets, liabilities, and risks. So that when things went bad, they went bad for theentire financial system. Thanks Thought Bubble.Some major financial players declared bankruptcy, like Lehman Brothers. Others were forced intomergers, or needed to be bailed out by the government. No one knew exactly how bad thebalance sheets at some of these financial institutions really were--these complicated,unregulated assets made it hard to tell.Panic set in. Trading and the credit markets froze. The stock market crashed. And the U.S.economy suddenly found itself in a disastrous recession.Jacob: So what did the government do? Well, it did a lot. The Federal Reserve steppedin and offered to make emergency loans to banks. The idea was to prevent fundamentallysound banks from collapsing just because their lenders were panicking. The government enacteda program called TARP, the troubled assets relief program, and which the rest of us callthe bank bailout. This initially earmarked $700 billion to shore up the banks. It actuallyended up spending $250 billion bailing out the banks, and was later expanded to helpauto makers, AIG, and homeowners.In combination with lending by The Fed, this helped stop the cascade of panic in the financialsystem. The treasury also conducted stress tests on the largest Wall Street banks. Governmentaccountants swarmed over bank balance sheets and publicly announced which ones were soundand which ones needed to raise more money. This eliminated some of the uncertaintiesthat had paralyzed lending among institutions.Congress also passed a huge stimulus package in January 2009. This pumped over $800 billioninto the economy, through new spending and tax cuts. This helped slow the free fall ofspending, output and employment.Adrienne: In 2010, Congress passed a financial reform, called the Dodd-Frank law. It tooksteps to increase transparency and prevent banks from taking on so much risk. Dodd-Frankdid a lot of things. It set up a consumer protection bureau to reduce predatory lending.It required that financial derivatives be traded in exchanges that all market participantscan observe. And it put mechanisms in place for large banks to fail in a controlled predictable manor.But, there's no consensus on whether this regulation is enough to prevent future crises.Jacob: So, what have we learned from all this? Well, one key factor that led to the 2008financial crisis was perverse incentives. A perverse incentive is when a policy endsup having a negative effect, opposite of what was intended. Like, mortgages brokers got bonusesfor lending out more money, but that encouraged them to make risky loans, which hurt profits in the end.That leads us to moral hazard. This is when one person takes on more risk, because someoneelse bears the burden of that risk. Banks and lenders were willing to lend to sub-prime borrowers becausethey planned to sell mortgages to somebody else. Everyone thought they could pass the risk up the line.The phrase "too big to fail" is a perfect example of moral hazard. If banks know that they'regoing to be bailed out by the government, they have incentive to make risky, or perhaps unwise bets.Former Fed Chairman, Alan Greenspan summed it up really nicely when he said,"If they're too big to fail, they're too big."Adrienne: When something terrible happens, people naturally look for someone to blame.In the case of the 2008 financial crisis, no one had to look very far because the blameand the pain was spread throughout the U.S. economy.The government failed to regulate and supervise the financial system. To quote the bi-partisan,financial crisis inquiry commission report, "the sentries were not at their posts, inno small part due to the widely accepted faith in the self-correcting nature of the markets,and the ability of financial institutions to effectively police themselves."The report placed some of the blame on the years of deregulation in the financial industry.And blamed regulators themselves for not doing more. The financial industry failed. Everyonein the system was borrowing too much money and taking too much risk, from the big financialinstitutions to individual borrowers. The institutions were taking on huge debt loadsto invest in risky assets. And huge numbers of home owners were taking on mortgages they couldn't afford.But the thing to remember about this massive systemic failure, is that it happened in asystem made up of humans, with human failing. Some didn't understand what was happening.Some willfully ignored the problems. And some were simply unethical, motivated by the massiveamounts of money involved.I think we should give the last word today to the financial crisis inquiry commissionreport. To paraphrase Shakespeare, they wrote, "The fault lies not in the stars, but in us."Thanks for watching.Crash Course Economics is made with the help of all of these nice people. We're able tostave off our own financial crisis each month, thanks to your support at Patreon. You canhelp keep Crash Course free for everyone, forever, and get great rewards at patreon.com.And given today's subject, be exuberant, but keep it rational.