Fill and Sign the Hearing King County Washington Form

Order Revoking Less Restrictive Alternative ( ORRV ) - Page 1 of 3 Treatment / Conditional Release MP 460 ( 07 /2019 ) RCW 71.05.590 Superior Court of Washington County of In re the Detention of: Respondent Case No. Order Revoking Less Restrictive Alternative Treatment / Conditional Release (ORRV) Hearing The court held a hearing on the petitioner/s ’ revocation petition/motion in this case . At the hearing: [ ] Respondent [ ] appeared in person [ ] appeared by video [ ] refused to appear [ ] Respondent waived his/her appearance through counsel [ ] Separate appearance waiver has been filed. [ ] Respondent has orally waived his/her appearance to defense counsel, and the court accepts this waiver. [ ] GAL [ ] appeared in person [ ] appeared by video [ ] waived appearance [ ] GAL waived Respondent's appearance [ ] Pe titioner appeared [ ] in person [ ] by video and was represented by DPA/AAG who appeared [ ] in person [ ] by video [ ] Respondent's Attorney appeared [ ] in person [ ] by video [ ] Witness appeared [ ] in person [ ] by video or [ ] under CR 43 [ ] by telephone [ ] [ ] Witness appeared [ ] in person [ ] by video or [ ] under CR 43 [ ] by telephone [ ] [ ] Agreed In addition to the written findings of fact and conclusions o f law, the court incorporates by reference the oral findings of fact and conclusions of law. Order Revoking Less Restrictive Alternative ( ORRV ) - Page 2 of 3 Treatment / Conditional Release MP 460 ( 07 /2019 ) RCW 71.05.590 Findings of Fact 1. The court reviewed the relevant court file and received testimony, if any, and finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that: [ ] W aiver of Hearing. Respondent waives hearing on the revocation petition and agrees to hospitalization. [ ] LRA Based on Felony Charges, Likelihood of Harm, Gravely Disabled: [ ] Violation of Order. Respondent violated the terms and conditions of the order and judgment for less restrictive alternative treatment/conditional release entered into on ____________________ by: [ ] Substantial Deterioration of Functionin g. A substantial deterioration of the Respondent's functioning has occurred . [ ] Substantial Decompensation. Respondent has suffered a substantial decompensation with a reasonable probability that the decompensation can be reversed by further inpatient treatment. [ ] Likelihood of Serious Harm. Respondent poses a likel ihood of serious harm. [ ] LRA Based On Assisted Outpatient Behavioral Health Treatment . As a result of a [ ] mental disorder [ ] substance use disorder: [ ] Likelihood of Serious Harm. Respondent poses a likelihood of serious harm. [ ] Gra ve Disability. Respondent is gravely disabled. [ ] is in danger of serious physical harm resulting from a failure to provide for his or her essential human needs of health or safety. [ ] manifests severe deterioration in routin e functioning eviden ced by repeated and escalating loss of cognitive or volitional control over his or her actions and is not receiving such care as is essential for his or her health or safety. Treatmen t. After considering less restrictive alternatives to involuntary detent ion and treatment, no such alternatives are in the best interests of the Respondent or others. There are no viable modifications to the less restrictive alternative treatment order that are in the best interests of the Respondent or others. The best inter ests of the Respondent and others would be served if the Respondent w as committed for inpatient treatment . 2. Adequate space for Respondent’s substance use disorder treatment. [ ] A secure withdrawal management and stabilization facility with adequa te space for the respondent [ ] is available [ ] is not available. [ ] An approved substance use disorder treatment program with adequate space for the respondent [ ] is available [ ] is not available. 3. Othe r: Conclusions of Law The court makes the following conclusions of law: Order Revoking Less Restrictive Alternative ( ORRV ) - Page 3 of 3 Treatment / Conditional Release MP 460 ( 07 /2019 ) RCW 71.05.590 4. Jurisdiction. The court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this mental illness proceeding; and 5. Commitment for Inpatient Treatment. The court should order the Respondent committ ed for a period of inpatient treatment. 6. Othe r: Orders The court orders that: 7. Remand and Commitment. Respondent is remanded into the custody of DSHS or to a facility certified by the Department of Health for commitment: [ ] Inpatient mental h ealth treatment at: [ ] Secure withdrawal management and stabilization facility at: [ ] Approved substance use disorder treatment program at: [ ] Other: for a period not to exceed days from . Escape and Recapture. If the Responde nt escapes from the treatment facility, any Peace Officer shall apprehend, detain, and return the Respondent to the treatment facility or to the evaluation and treatment facility designated by a Designated Crisis Responder. [ ] Transportation. The Res pondent is remanded into the custody of for transportation and delivery to the treatment facility. 8. Othe r: Dated Judge / Commissioner Approved for entry Approved for entry Attorney for Petitioner DPA/AAG Attorney for Respondent WSBA No. WSBA No. Respondent Interpreter certifies that he/she has reviewed this order with Respondent. Interpreter