Establishing secure connection… Loading editor… Preparing document…
Navigation

Fill and Sign the Motion Summary Judgment Mississippi 497314749 Form

Fill and Sign the Motion Summary Judgment Mississippi 497314749 Form

How it works

Open the document and fill out all its fields.
Apply your legally-binding eSignature.
Save and invite other recipients to sign it.

Rate template

4.5
41 votes
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE       DIVISION       PLAINTIFF VS. CIVIL ACTION NO.             DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT COMES Defendant,       , and submits this its Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment filed herein and would state in support thereof the following: FACTS       was appointed as       by       and Board of Aldermen on or about       ,       . He/She served in that position until the new Mayor and Board of Aldermen were elected in       ,       and took office on       ,       .       alleges in his/her Complaint that he/she is entitled to overtime compensation since the date of his/her appointment until his/her appointment ended. He/She claims       hours "at work" overtime and       hours "at home" overtime. He/She maintained no records for the "at home" overtime and the records maintained "at work" were incomplete. On       ,       the outgoing Mayor and Board of Aldermen met in its final meeting. At that meeting       requested that the outgoing Mayor and Board pay him/her overtime and an Order was entered providing that       ,       and       be paid for overtime. There is no mention in the record of the amount of overtime to be paid and the tape recording of the meeting has been destroyed by       . See       Deposition, page       . Via Deposition, page       . R.       . Subsequent to the       meeting       and the Board were advised by their attorney and accountant that overtime pay to       and       would be improper because these employees were exempt from       and because same would be an unlawful gift.       , who was secretary to       , received his/her overtime pay. Based upon the advise given,       refused to sign a check that was presented to him/her by       in the amount of $       and no payment was made to       . On       ,       instituted suit against       in this Court alleging that he/she was entitled to the following relief: (A) Judgment for       hours of overtime at $       per hour for a total of $       . (B) Liquidated damages of $       . (C) Overtime pay for hours worked at home. (D) Judgment for       hours of regular time at $       per hour for $       . (E) Attorney's fees, costs and pre-judgment interest. The       contends that       is exempt from the FLSA as an executive or administrative employee and that the position of       is a position established by statute as an elective office which became appointive by action of the Mayor and Board. The Defendant also contends that Plaintiff's action is partially barred by the applicable statute of limitations.       supports its contention that       is exempt from the FLSA by the following facts: 1.       was paid on a salary basis. 2.       duties as       primarily consisted of managing the administrative department of       . 3.       customarily and regularly directed the work of two or more employees under his/her department. 4.       hired employees and made recommendations concerning hiring, advancement and salaries of other employees. 5.       received compensation on a salary basis at not less than $       per week. 6.       received the same amount of pay each pay period without reduction because of variations in the quality or quantity of his/her work. 7.       received his/her full salary each week regardless of the days or hours worked. 8.       trained other employees and planned and directed the work of employees. 9.       maintained the employee records and time. 10.       handled complaints from employees. 11. Other facts stated below. ARGUMENT The relevant portion of the Fair Labor Standards Act which applies to this case provides: The provisions of...Section 207 of this title shall not apply with respect to - (1) any employee employed in a bonafide executive, administrative, or professional capacity... 29 U.S.C.A. Section 213(A)(1). The Courts apply this exemption narrowly, and the burden of proof to demonstrate that the exemption applies is on the Defendant. Hodgson v. Colonnades, Inc. , 472 F.2d 42, 47 (5th Cir. 1973); Wallen v. General Industries Co. , 330 US 545, 547-48, 67 S.Ct. 883, 884, 91 L.Ed. 108 (1947). A. EXECUTIVE EXEMPTION This relevant section of the Code of Federal Regulations provides in regard to the executive exemption that: The term "employee employed in a bona fide executive       capacity" in section 13(a)(1) of the Act shall mean any employee: (a) Whose primary duty consists of the management of the enterprise in which he/she is employed or of a customarily recognized department of subdivision thereof; and (b) Who customarily and regularly directs the work of two or more other employees therein; and (c) Who has the authority to hire or fire other employees or whose suggestions and recommendations as to the hiring or firing and as to the advancement and promotion or any other change of status of other employees will be given particular weight; and (d) Who customarily and regularly exercises discretionary powers; and (e) Who does not devote more than       percent... of his/her hours of work in the workweek to activities which are not directly and closely related to the performance of the work described in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section... and (f) Who is compensated for his/her service on a salary basis at a rate of not less than $       per week: Provided, That an employee who is compensated on a salary basis at a rate of not less than $       per week... and whose primary duty consists of the management of the enterprise in which the employee is employed or of a customarily recognized department or subdivision thereof, and includes the customary and regular direction of the work of two or more other employees therein, shall be deemed to meet all the requirements of this section. 29 C.F.R. § 541.1 (1986) The above regulations establish a long and short test for establishing the executive exemption. The short test has four requirements that must be met before an employee is deemed an "executive." These requirements are that (1) The employee must be paid "on a salary basis"; (2) The employee's primary duty consists of the management of the enterprise in which he/she is employed or of a customarily recognized department thereof; (3) The employee customarily and regularly directs the work of two or more other employees therein; and (4) The employee is paid not less than $       per week. B. ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION The relevant portion of the code provides in regard to the administrative exemption the following: The term "employee employed in a bonafide       administrative       capacity" in section 13(a)(1) of the act shall mean any employee: (a) Whose primary duty consists of either: (1) The performance of office or non-manual work directly related to management policies or general business operations of his/her employer or he/she employer's customers, or (2) The performance of functions in the administration of a school system, or educational establishment or institution, or of a department or supervision thereof, in work directly related to the academic instruction or training carried on therein: and (b) Who customarily and regularly exercises discretion and independent judgment; and (c) (1) Who regularly and directly assists a proprietor, or an employee employed in a bona fide executive or administrative capacity (as such terms are defined in the regulations of this subpart), or (2) Who performs under only general supervision work along specialized or technical lines requiring special training, experience, or knowledge, or (3) Who executed under only general supervision special assignments and tasks; and (d) Who does not devote more than       percent... of his/her hours worked in the workweek to activities which are not directly and closely related to the performance of the work described in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section; and (e) (1) Who is compensated for his/her services on a salary or fee basis at a rate of not less than $       per week... exclusive or board, lodging, or other facilities, or (2) ... Provided, Than an employee who is compensated on a salary or fee basis at a rate of not less that $       per week... exclusive of board, lodging, or other facilities, and whose primary duty consists of the performance of work described in paragraph (a) of this section, which includes work requiring the exercise of discretion and independent judgment, shall be deemed to meet all the requirements of this section. 29 C.F.R. § 541.2 Under this regulation there is also a long and short test for determining exemption status. In order to fall under the short test the employee must (1) be paid a salary of $       per week and (2) have as his or her primary duty the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to management policies or general business operations of his or her employer which includes work requiring the exercise of discretion and independent judgment. If the employee "qualifies for exemption under this proviso, it is not necessary to test that employee's qualifications in detail under paragraphs (a) through (f) of § 541.1 of this Part." 29 C.F.R. § 541.119. C. EXECUTIVE SHORT TEST FACTORS (i) SALARY BASIS Under both the Executive and administrative exemption the employee must be paid on a salary basis. The relevant code provision provides in this regard the following: An employee will be considered to be paid "on a salary basis" within the meaning of the regulations if under his/her employment agreement he/she regularly receives each pay period on a weekly, or less frequent bases, a predetermined amount constituting all or part of his/her compensation, which amount is not subject to reduction because of variations in the quality or quantity of the work performed. Subject to the exceptions provided below, the employee must receive his/her full salary for any week in which he/she performs any work without regard to the number of days or hours worked. This policy is also subject to the general rule that an employee need not be paid for any workweek in which he/she performs no work. 29 C.F.R. § 541.118(a) 1986. The salary must be $       per week or more for the short test to apply.       , since his/her employment as       , had earned in excess of $       per week. He/She was paid on a salary basis by his/her own admission. See also       Deposition, page       .       received $       semi-monthly when he/she was appointed as       on       ,       and received a salary increase to $       semi-monthly on       ,       ,       (       ) days after his/her appointment.       Deposition, page       . Minutes of Board,             . On       ,       , he/she was increases to $       monthly.       Deposition, page       . (ii) CUSTOMARILY RECOGNIZED DEPARTMENT OR SUBDIVISION THEREOF [t]he phrase "a customarily recognized department or subdivision" is intended to distinguish between a mere collection of (wo)men assigned from time to time to a specific job or series of jobs and a unit with permanent status and function... [The employee] must be in charge of and have as his primary duty the management of a recognized unit which has a continuing function. 29 C.F.R. § 541.104(a)       contends that       was in charge of the Administrative employees of       who all worked in       and the Administrative department of       is a recognized department of       . Thus, the customarily recognized department requirement is met. The regulations recognize that the customarily recognized department is generally an easy question and that the difficulty arises when the employee works outside their employer's establishment. 29 C.F.R. §541.104(b). Thus, the question is whether       was in charge of that department, not whether that department existed. (iii) MANAGEMENT OF DEPARTMENT Being "in charge" of a department is determined by the employee's management of that department. The following relevant activities are considered to be managerial duties: (1) The training of employees; (2) The planning and directing of the work of employees; (3) Maintaining records for use in supervision and control; (4) Appraising worker productivity and efficiency for the purpose of recommending promotions or other changes in worker status; and (5) The handling of complaints. 29 C.F.R. § 541.102(b) (1986) The code section provides in part that management consists of the following: Interviewing, selecting, and training of employees; setting and adjusting their rates of pay and hours of work; directing their work; maintaining their production or sales records for use in supervision or control; appraising their productivity and efficiency for the purpose of recommending promotions or other changes in their status; handling their complaints and grievances and disciplining them when necessary; planning the work; determining the techniques to be used; apportioning the work among the workers; determining the type of materials, supplies, machinery of tools to be used or merchandise to be bought, stocked and sold; controlling the flow and distribution of materials or merchandise and supplies; providing for the safety of the (wo)men and the property. 29 C.F.R. § 541.102.       was in charge of the employees at       who worked in the administrative department of the Town. His/Her primary duty consisted of managing these office personnel. These people consisted of a receptionist, secretary to       , accountant, permit clerk and other office personnel. All of these people reported to       . He/She trained employees, planed and directed their work, maintained employee records, and handled complaints. According to the testimony of       , Secretary to       , the following facts are true: 1.       was interviewed, selected and trained by       as his/her secretary.       Deposition, page 5. R.       . See also Minutes of       . R.       . 2.       reported directly to       .       Deposition, page       . R.       . 3.       prepared board minutes from tape recordings and notes and was instructed on how to do same by       .       would review the minutes prior to approval by the Board and make changes he/she desired.       Deposition, page       . R.       . 4. Prices of items to be purchased for the Town would be obtained by       and       would review them with       .       would instruct him/her where to buy the item and sign a purchase order for the item.       Deposition, page       . R.       . 5.       was in charge of all purchasing for the Town, including the Police, fire and public works department. The purchase orders were approved by       .       Deposition, page       . R.       . 6.       did not consult with the Mayor on all purchase orders but sometimes the police, public works and fire departments would go directly to the Mayor.       Deposition, page       . R.       . 7.       had authority over       , Public works director, including the power to approve or disapprove his/her purchase orders.       Deposition, page       . R.       . See Interdepartmental Memo to       from       . R.       . 8.       was in charge of all books for the departments and personnel would come to him/her to determine how much money was in their budget.       Deposition, page       . R.       . 9. Water bills were generated by computer and reviewed and corrected at the direction of       .       Deposition, page       . R.       . 10. Cut-off lists for delinquent water customers were reviewed by       and he/she determined who to cut-off.       Deposition, page       . R.       . See also, Interdepartmental Memo from       to       R.       . 11.       was the key punch operator who generated the water bills. He/She was under the supervision of       and was hired by       and the       .       recommended       to the Board.       Deposition, page       . R.       . 12.       was the building permit clerk and was under the supervision of       and reported to       .       Deposition, page       . R.       . 13.       , internal accountant for the Town, reported to       as well as       , outside accountant and auditor for the Town.       Deposition, page       . R.       . 14.       set up the budgets for each department of the Town.       Deposition, page       . R.       . 15. The employee records and time sheets were kept by       in his/her] office.       Deposition, page       . R.       . 16.       would allow employees who needed to take time off to work extra time (i.e. through lunch) to build up time to take off.       Deposition, page       . R.       . 17.       approved time off for the employees at Town Hall.       Deposition, page       Lines       . R.       . 18.       , receptionist,       and       would obtain approval for overtime work from       .       Deposition, page       . R.       . 19. Employees with disputes would go to the       or       or if to the       he/she would send them to       for him/her to handle the dispute.       Deposition, page       . R.       . The       would allow       to make the decision regarding a dispute between employees.       Deposition, page       . R.       . 20. The Town accountant and Engineers consulted with       and primarily dealt with       to solve problems.       Deposition, page       . R.       . 21.       , receptionist and water bill clerk reported directly to       .       Deposition, page       . R.       . 20.       and       would conduct office meetings.       Deposition, page       .       , Mayor of the Town of       during the entire employment of       , testified regarding the following matters. 1.       was next in command only to the       .       Deposition, page       . 2.       duties were to supervise work of other employees and designate what tasks other employees would perform.       Deposition, page       .       was the immediate supervisor of all employees of Town Hall.       Deposition, page       . 3.       never instructed       to keep up with his/her time or extra time that he/she worked and never told him/her that he/she would be paid for time over and above his/her salary.       Deposition, page       . 4.       would interview prospective employees, introduce them to the       and recommend to the       what person he/she felt was best for the job. p.       . 5.       was responsible for building permits, p       , financial records of the Town, p       , claims docket, p       , maintaining tax rolls, conducting tax sales and investing the Towns money. p       . See also Minutes of       authorizing       to invest money of the town. R.       . 6.       was in charge of water payments. P       . 7.       , accountant, was under       supervision. P       . 8.       had authority to sign purchase orders and did so without consulting the       on every order. P       . 9.       was in charge of the Certificates of Deposit of the Town and would shop around for the best interest rates upon renewal and make the decision of where to place the towns money. p       . 10.       would make the decision on a day-to-day basis of how much money to put into the operating account of the Town and how much to leave in Certificates. p       . 11. The majority of       time was spent supervising other employees of the Town and directing the details of their work to see that they were doing it to please him/her . p       . 12.       checked with       who he/she considered to be an expert in the field of the FLSA and received advise and a letter the       would be exempt form the act. p       . 13. The Mayor and Board would go along with anyone that       recommended for employment. p       . 14. After the       ,       meeting       asked       their opinion on the application of the FLSA to       and the others. p.       . 15.       was recommended by       . P       . 16.       17.       18.       19.       20.       21.       The minutes of the Board clearly demonstrate that       recommended a salary increase for       , the accountant, on             . R.       . On       ,       ,       was appointed as office manager of the Town as providing in the Minutes. Minutes of Board       . R.       . The personnel Policies and Procedures Manual of the Town of       provides that "these rules shall be administered by the City Clerk with the approval of the Mayor and under the direction of the Mayor and Board". R.       . It also provides that "the City Clerk shall be responsible for the recruitment examination, and record keeping for all applicants for positions with the Town". R.       . It also provides that the Clerk shall "publicize vacancies", R.       , and that he/she is "charged with maintenance of the position classification plan so that it will reflect the duties performed by each employee" and that "it is his/her duty to examine the nature of the positions as they are created and to make such changes as necessary in the classification plan, with approval of the Mayor and Board." R.       . It also provides that "The City Clerk shall establish and maintain a system of employee performance appraisals, with the approval of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen. R.       . Information regarding employee insurance and retirement was maintained and available from the Clerk. R.       . The Clerk also recorded, processed and maintained all personnel records and transactions involving employees, positions and dates of pay of employees. R       . It is the Clerk's duty to document all employee data and keep the records up to date. R.       . (iv) DIRECTS WORK OF TWO OR MORE EMPLOYEES       directed the work of more than two people. He/She supervised and directed the work of the following people: 1.       , receptionist and water bill clerk. 2.       , secretary to       . 3.       , permit Clerk. 4.       , computer operator. 5.       , accountant. 6.       ,       , hired       ,       . D. ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT TEST EXEMPTION (i) SALARY BASIS This is the same requirement as under the executive exemption which       clearly meets. (ii) DISCRETIONARY DUTIES The employee must have as his or her primary duty the performance of office or non- manual work directly related to management policies or general business operations of his or her employer which includes work requiring the exercise of discretion and independent judgment. According to 29 C.F.R. 541.207(e)(1): . . . decisions made as a result of the exercise of discretion and independent judgment may consist of recommendations for action rather that the actual taking of action. The fact that an employee's decision are revised or reversed after review does not mean that the employee is not exercising discretion and independent judgment within the meaning of the regulations in Subpart A of this part. 29 C.F.R. § 541.207(e)(1) Section 541.103 states that this determination depends "on all the facts in a particular case," but that a "good rule of thumb" is that an employee who spends over fifty percent of his/her time in administrative duties would satisfy the requirement. However, "time alone . . . is not the sole test." An employee who spends less than fifty per cent of his/her time in administrative duties would satisfy the requirement if "other pertinent factors" support a conclusion that administrative matters constitute his/her primary duty. These other factors include: (1) the relative importance of the administrative duties as compared with other types of duties; (2) the frequency with which the employee exercises discretionary powers; (3) his/her relative freedom from supervision; and (4) the relationship between his/her salary and the wages paid other employees for the same type of non-exempt work. This guide is stated in the regulations as follows: The amount of time spent in the performance of the managerial duties is a useful guide in determining whether management is the primary duty of an employee, in the ordinary case id may be taken as a good rule of thumb that primary duty means the major part, or over 50 percent, of the employee's time. Thus, and employee who spends over 50 percent of his/her time in management would have management as his/her primary duty. Time alone, however, is not the sole test, and in situations where the employee does not spend over 50 percent of his/her time in managerial duties, he/she might nevertheless have management as his/her primary duty if the other pertinent factors support such a conclusion. Some of these pertinent factors are the relative importance of the managerial duties as compared with other types of duties, the frequency with which the employee exercises discretionary powers, his/her relative freedom from supervision, and the relationship between his/her salary and the wages paid other employees for the kind of nonexempt work performed by the supervisor. 29 C.F.R. § 541.103. In the case at hand,       meets both the long and short tests which make him/her exempt from the FLSA as an executive or administrative employee. E. STATUE OF LIMITATIONS F. CONCLUSION Respectfully submitted, _______________________________________       Attorney for       Of Counsel:                         Telephone:       MSB #       Attorney for       CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

Useful suggestions for finishing your ‘Motion Summary Judgment Mississippi 497314749’ online

Are you weary of the complexity of handling paperwork? Look no further than airSlate SignNow, the premier electronic signature solution for individuals and organizations. Bid farewell to the monotonous process of printing and scanning documents. With airSlate SignNow, you can effortlessly complete and sign paperwork online. Take advantage of the powerful features integrated into this user-friendly and cost-effective platform and transform your approach to document management. Whether you need to approve forms or collect eSignatures, airSlate SignNow manages it all seamlessly, with just a few clicks.

Follow this comprehensive guide:

  1. Log into your account or register for a complimentary trial with our service.
  2. Click +Create to upload a file from your device, cloud storage, or our form repository.
  3. Open your ‘Motion Summary Judgment Mississippi 497314749’ in the editor.
  4. Click Me (Fill Out Now) to set up the form on your end.
  5. Add and assign fillable fields for others (if needed).
  6. Proceed with the Send Invite settings to solicit eSignatures from others.
  7. Save, print your copy, or convert it into a reusable template.

Don’t fret if you need to collaborate with your colleagues on your Motion Summary Judgment Mississippi 497314749 or send it for notarization—our solution includes everything you need to tackle such tasks. Create an account with airSlate SignNow today and elevate your document management to a new height!

Here is a list of the most common customer questions. If you can’t find an answer to your question, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us.

Need help? Contact Support

The best way to complete and sign your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form

Save time on document management with airSlate SignNow and get your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form eSigned quickly from anywhere with our fully compliant eSignature tool.

How to Sign a PDF Online How to Sign a PDF Online

How to complete and sign paperwork online

Previously, dealing with paperwork took lots of time and effort. But with airSlate SignNow, document management is easy and fast. Our powerful and easy-to-use eSignature solution enables you to easily complete and electronically sign your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form online from any internet-connected device.

Follow the step-by-step guide to eSign your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form template online:

  • 1.Sign up for a free trial with airSlate SignNow or log in to your account with password credentials or SSO authentication.
  • 2.Click Upload or Create and import a file for eSigning from your device, the cloud, or our form library.
  • 3.Click on the file name to open it in the editor and use the left-side toolbar to fill out all the empty areas appropriately.
  • 4.Place the My Signature field where you need to approve your form. Provide your name, draw, or upload an image of your regular signature.
  • 5.Click Save and Close to accomplish editing your completed form.

As soon as your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form template is ready, download it to your device, export it to the cloud, or invite other people to eSign it. With airSlate SignNow, the eSigning process only requires a couple of clicks. Use our powerful eSignature solution wherever you are to manage your paperwork effectively!

How to Sign a PDF Using Google Chrome How to Sign a PDF Using Google Chrome

How to fill out and sign paperwork in Google Chrome

Completing and signing paperwork is simple with the airSlate SignNow extension for Google Chrome. Installing it to your browser is a quick and productive way to deal with your paperwork online. Sign your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form sample with a legally-binding eSignature in a couple of clicks without switching between tools and tabs.

Follow the step-by-step guide to eSign your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form in Google Chrome:

  • 1.Navigate to the Chrome Web Store, locate the airSlate SignNow extension for Chrome, and add it to your browser.
  • 2.Right-click on the link to a document you need to sign and select Open in airSlate SignNow.
  • 3.Log in to your account with your credentials or Google/Facebook sign-in option. If you don’t have one, sign up for a free trial.
  • 4.Use the Edit & Sign toolbar on the left to complete your template, then drag and drop the My Signature field.
  • 5.Upload an image of your handwritten signature, draw it, or simply type in your full name to eSign.
  • 6.Make sure all the details are correct and click Save and Close to finish editing your paperwork.

Now, you can save your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form sample to your device or cloud storage, send the copy to other individuals, or invite them to electronically sign your form via an email request or a protected Signing Link. The airSlate SignNow extension for Google Chrome enhances your document processes with minimum time and effort. Start using airSlate SignNow today!

How to Sign a PDF in Gmail How to Sign a PDF in Gmail How to Sign a PDF in Gmail

How to complete and sign forms in Gmail

When you receive an email containing the motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form for signing, there’s no need to print and scan a file or download and re-upload it to another program. There’s a better solution if you use Gmail. Try the airSlate SignNow add-on to rapidly eSign any paperwork right from your inbox.

Follow the step-by-step guide to eSign your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form in Gmail:

  • 1.Visit the Google Workplace Marketplace and locate a airSlate SignNow add-on for Gmail.
  • 2.Set up the program with a related button and grant the tool access to your Google account.
  • 3.Open an email containing an attached file that needs signing and use the S sign on the right sidebar to launch the add-on.
  • 4.Log in to your airSlate SignNow account. Choose Send to Sign to forward the document to other people for approval or click Upload to open it in the editor.
  • 5.Put the My Signature option where you need to eSign: type, draw, or upload your signature.

This eSigning process saves efforts and only requires a few clicks. Use the airSlate SignNow add-on for Gmail to adjust your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form with fillable fields, sign documents legally, and invite other people to eSign them al without leaving your inbox. Enhance your signature workflows now!

How to Sign a PDF on a Mobile Device How to Sign a PDF on a Mobile Device How to Sign a PDF on a Mobile Device

How to fill out and sign paperwork in a mobile browser

Need to quickly complete and sign your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form on a smartphone while doing your work on the go? airSlate SignNow can help without needing to install additional software programs. Open our airSlate SignNow tool from any browser on your mobile device and create legally-binding eSignatures on the go, 24/7.

Follow the step-by-step guide to eSign your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form in a browser:

  • 1.Open any browser on your device and follow the link www.signnow.com
  • 2.Create an account with a free trial or log in with your password credentials or SSO option.
  • 3.Click Upload or Create and pick a file that needs to be completed from a cloud, your device, or our form catalogue with ready-made templates.
  • 4.Open the form and complete the empty fields with tools from Edit & Sign menu on the left.
  • 5.Add the My Signature field to the sample, then type in your name, draw, or add your signature.

In a few easy clicks, your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form is completed from wherever you are. Once you're finished editing, you can save the document on your device, create a reusable template for it, email it to other people, or ask them to eSign it. Make your paperwork on the go quick and productive with airSlate SignNow!

How to Sign a PDF on iPhone How to Sign a PDF on iPhone

How to complete and sign paperwork on iOS

In today’s business community, tasks must be accomplished quickly even when you’re away from your computer. With the airSlate SignNow app, you can organize your paperwork and approve your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form with a legally-binding eSignature right on your iPhone or iPad. Set it up on your device to close deals and manage documents from anyplace 24/7.

Follow the step-by-step guidelines to eSign your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form on iOS devices:

  • 1.Go to the App Store, search for the airSlate SignNow app by airSlate, and set it up on your device.
  • 2.Open the application, tap Create to import a template, and select Myself.
  • 3.Choose Signature at the bottom toolbar and simply draw your autograph with a finger or stylus to eSign the sample.
  • 4.Tap Done -> Save after signing the sample.
  • 5.Tap Save or utilize the Make Template option to re-use this document later on.

This process is so easy your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form is completed and signed in just a couple of taps. The airSlate SignNow application works in the cloud so all the forms on your mobile device remain in your account and are available whenever you need them. Use airSlate SignNow for iOS to improve your document management and eSignature workflows!

How to Sign a PDF on Android How to Sign a PDF on Android

How to complete and sign paperwork on Android

With airSlate SignNow, it’s simple to sign your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form on the go. Install its mobile application for Android OS on your device and start improving eSignature workflows right on your smartphone or tablet.

Follow the step-by-step guidelines to eSign your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form on Android:

  • 1.Open Google Play, find the airSlate SignNow app from airSlate, and install it on your device.
  • 2.Log in to your account or create it with a free trial, then upload a file with a ➕ option on the bottom of you screen.
  • 3.Tap on the imported document and choose Open in Editor from the dropdown menu.
  • 4.Tap on Tools tab -> Signature, then draw or type your name to electronically sign the sample. Fill out empty fields with other tools on the bottom if necessary.
  • 5.Utilize the ✔ button, then tap on the Save option to end up with editing.

With a user-friendly interface and full compliance with primary eSignature requirements, the airSlate SignNow app is the perfect tool for signing your motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form. It even operates without internet and updates all record modifications when your internet connection is restored and the tool is synced. Complete and eSign forms, send them for approval, and create re-usable templates anytime and from anywhere with airSlate SignNow.

Sign up and try Motion summary judgment mississippi 497314749 form
  • Close deals faster
  • Improve productivity
  • Delight customers
  • Increase revenue
  • Save time & money
  • Reduce payment cycles