Superior Court of Washington, County of
In re parentage:
Petitioner (person who started this case) :
And Respondents (current legal parents) :
Children over age 2:
No.
Findings and Conclusions about Parentage
(after Acknowledgment or earlier Court
Decision)
(FNFCL)
Findings and Conclusions about Parentage
(after Acknowledgment or Earlier Court Decision)
1. Basis for findings and conclusions (check all that apply):
Parties’ agreement
Default Order or Summary Judgment Order (date):
Order after Sexual Assault Fact-Finding Hearing on (date):
Trial for this case on (date): , with the following people present
(check all that apply):
Petitioner (name): This person’s lawyer
Respondent (name): This person’s lawyer
Respondent (name): This person’s lawyer
Guardian ad Litem for ( children’s names):
Other (name and relationship to this case):
CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630
Mandatory Form (07/2017)
FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage
(after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision)
p. 1 of 10
Other (name and relationship to this case):
Other (name and relationship to this case):
CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630
Mandatory Form (07/2017)
FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage
(after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision)
p. 2 of 10
The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
2. Notice and Personal Jurisdiction
All people with a right to receive notice of this case were served with the Summons and
Petition . except (name/s): .
(Check all that apply):
(Name/s) was/were served in this state.
(Name/s) live/s in this state now.
(Name/s) lived in this state with the
children.
(Name/s) lived in this state and paid for
pregnancy costs or support for the children.
(Name/s) did or said something that
caused the children to live in this state.
(Name/s) h ad sex in this state, which
may have produced the children.
(Name/s) signed an agreement to join
this Petition or other document agreeing that the court can decide his or her rights in
this case.
None of the reasons listed above apply to (name):
Other (specify):
Conclusion: The court has personal jurisdiction over all parties to this case.
except (name/s):
.
3. Parentage originally established (Repeat this section for each child as needed.)
By Court Order – Parentage was established by court order for (children’s
names): on (date):
by (name of court): .
Petitioner (check one): was was not included as a party in that court case.
By Paternity Acknowledgment – The Respondents signed a Paternity
Acknowledgment (Affidavit) for (child’s name):
that was filed with the appropriate agency of the state of
on (date): .
The mother was married or in a registered domestic partnership when the child
was born (or within 300 days before). Her spouse/partner (name):
CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630
Mandatory Form (07/2017)
FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage
(after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision)
p. 3 of 10
signed a Denial of Paternity that was
filed with the appropriate agency of the state of on
(date) .
Petitioner (check one): did did not sign that Paternity Acknowledgment
Denial of Paternity .
Conclusion: The Petitioner (check one):
has the right to bring this case because he was not involved in the court
order or acknowledgment that originally established parentage.
does not have the right to bring this case because he was involved in
the court order or acknowledgment that originally established
parentage. The Petition should be denied.
4. Deadline to file Petition
The Petition to Decide Parentage (after Acknowledgment or Court Decision) was first filed
or served on (date): .
This date is (check one): within four years of more than four years after:
the date a Court decided who the children’s legal parents were, or
the date a Paternity Acknowledgement was filed (or the child’s birthdate, if the child
was born after the Paternity Acknowledgement was filed).
Conclusion: The Petition was filed (check one):
before the four-year deadline.
after the four-year deadline and should be denied.
5. Guardian ad Litem
No Guardian ad Litem (GAL) was appointed.
The Court appointed (name): Guardian
ad Litem (GAL) for (children’s names): .
The court has considered the report and recommendations of the GAL.
The GAL should be discharged.
Other (specify) :
6. Genetic Testing Admitted
Does not apply. Either genetic testing was not done, or the results were not admitted.
(Skip to 7 .)
This issue was decided in the Summary Judgment Order signed by the court on
(date): . (Skip to 7 .)
The following genetic testing results were admitted as evidence (check all that apply) :
Petitioner Tested – Genetic paternity testing was done with the Petitioner
(name):
.
The testing was done by (check one): court order. agreement with the
Respondents.
CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630
Mandatory Form (07/2017)
FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage
(after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision)
p. 4 of 10
The test results (check one):
show a 99% or greater probability that the Petitioner is the biological parent of
(children’s names)t:
.
exclude Petitioner as a biological parent of (children’s names):
.
Respondent Tested – Genetic paternity testing was done with the Respondent
(name):
.
The testing was done by (check one): court order agreement of the
Respondents.
The test results (check one):
show a 99% or greater probability that this Respondent is the biological parent
of (children’s names):
.
exclude this Respondent as a biological parent of (children’s names):
.
Test Results Challenged – The genetic paternity test results were challenged by
(name): . The court concludes that the
challenged test results (check one): are are not valid because (specify) :
Other (specify):
Conclusion: (Check one):
The court should decide parentage according to the genetic test
results described above.
The court should not decide parentage according to the genetic
test results described above because the court found the test
results are invalid.
The court should not decide parentage according to the genetic
test results described above based on the Order after Sexual
Assault Fact-Finding Hearing .
7. Genetic Testing Not Admitted
Does not apply. Genetic testing results were admitted. (Skip to 8 .)
This issue was decided in the Summary Judgment Order signed by the court on
CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630
Mandatory Form (07/2017)
FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage
(after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision)
p. 5 of 10
(date): . (Skip to 8 .)
Genetic testing was not done, or the results were not admitted.
Conclusion: (Check all that apply):
Not Ordered – The children have an Acknowledged or Adjudicated Parent.
The court concludes that ordering genetic testing is not in the children’s best
interest after considering the report and recommendation of the children’s
Guardian ad Litem.
This conclusion is based on the following (check all that apply):
See Order on Motion for Genetic Testing .
(Describe clear and convincing evidence why testing is not in the child’s
best interest):
Not Admitted – The children have an Acknowledged or Adjudicated Parent.
Genetic testing results were not admitted because the testing was done without
either a court order or agreement of the Birth Mother and the Acknowledged or
Adjudicated Parent.
No Cooperation – (Name): did not cooperate with
an order for genetic testing. This conclusion is based on the following facts
(describe the failure to cooperate):
Because this person did not cooperate with genetic testing, the court
concludes that he (check one): should should not be the legal
father of the children. RCW 26.26.575(2). This is in the child’s best
interest because (explain):
Other (specify):
8. Children’s Names
The children’s names should not be changed.
The children’s names should be changed as listed on the Final Parentage Order (after
Acknowledgment or earlier Court Decision) .
9. Jurisdiction over the children (RCW 26.27.201 – .221, .231, .261, .271)
The court can approve a Parenting Plan or Residential Schedule for these children and
decide who the children should live with most of the time because (check all that apply;
if a box applies to all of the children, you may write “the children” instead of listing
names):
Exclusive, continuing jurisdiction – A Washington court has already made a
custody order or parenting plan for the children, and the court still has authority to
make other orders for (children’s names):
.
CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630
Mandatory Form (07/2017)
FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage
(after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision)
p. 6 of 10
Home state jurisdiction – Washington is the children’s home state because
(check all that apply):
(Children’s names): lived in Washington with
a parent or someone acting as a parent for at least the 6 months just before
this case was filed, or if the children were less than 6 months old when the
case was filed, they had lived in Washington with a parent or someone acting
as a parent since birth.
There were times the children were not in Washington in the 6 months just
before this case was filed (or since birth if they were less than 6 months
old), but those were temporary absences.
(Children’s names): do not live in Washington
right now, but Washington was the children’s home state some time in the 6
months just before this case was filed, and a p arent or someone acting as a
parent of the children still lives in Washington.
(Children’s names): do not have another
home state.
No home state or home state declined – No court of any other state (or tribe)
has the jurisdiction to make decisions for (children’s names):
, or a court in the children’s home state
(or tribe) decided it is better to have this case in Washington and:
The children and a parent or someone acting as a parent have ties to
Washington beyond just living here; and
There is a lot of information (substantial evidence) about the children’s care,
protection, education and relationships in this state.
Other state declined – The courts in other states (or tribes) that might be
(children’s names): ’s home state
have refused to take this case because it is better to have this case in Washington .
Temporary emergency jurisdiction – Washington had temporary emergency
jurisdiction over ( children’s names):
when the case was filed, and now has jurisdiction to make a final custody decision
because:
When the case was filed, the children were abandoned in this state, or the
children were in this state and the children (or children’s parent, brother or
sister) was abused or threatened with abuse;
The court signed a temporary order on (date) saying that
Washington’s jurisdiction will become final if no case is filed in the children’s
home state (or tribe) by the time the children have been in Washington for 6
months;
The children have now lived in Washington for 6 months; and
No case concerning the children has been started in the children’s home
state (or tribe).
Other reason (specify):
CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630
Mandatory Form (07/2017)
FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage
(after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision)
p. 7 of 10
The court cannot approve a Parenting Plan or Residential Schedule for (children’s
names):
or decide who the children should live with most of the time because the court does
not have jurisdiction over these children.
10. Parenting Plan or Residential Schedule
The court has jurisdiction over the children as listed in section 9 above. (Check one):
The court signed the final Parenting Plan or Residential Schedule filed
separately today or on (date): .
No one requested a Parenting Plan or Residential Schedule . The children
have been living with (name): most of the time.
The children should continue to live with this parent most of the time. This
parent should be named the children’s custodian.
The plan, schedule or custodian is approved (check one):
by default. The court considered the court record.
by agreement of both parents without a contested hearing. The court
considered the parties’ agreement and the following evidence, if any:
.
after a summary judgment hearing. The court considered the evidence listed in
the Summary Judgment Order .
after trial. The court considered all of the evidence admitted at trial.
The court has jurisdiction over the children as listed in section 9 above. No Parenting
Plan or Residential Schedule should be entered based on the Order after Sexual
Assault Fact-Finding Hearing .
The court does not have jurisdiction over the children as listed in section 9 above.
Therefore, the court cannot approve a Parenting Plan or Residential Schedule, or
decide who the children should live with most of the time.
Other (specify):
11. Child Support
The children should be supported according to state law. The court signed the final
Child Support Order and Worksheets filed separately today or on (date):
.
No child support should be established or collected based on the Order after Sexual
Assault Fact-Finding Hearing .
The court is not making a decision about child support now because:
Other (specify):
12. Protection Order
CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630
Mandatory Form (07/2017)
FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage
(after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision)
p. 8 of 10
No one requested an Order for Protection in this case.
(Name): requested an Order for Protection in this
case.
Conclusion: The court should (check one):
not approve an Order for Protection because:
approve an Order for Protection because:
13. Restraining Order
No one requested a Restraining Order in this case.
(Name): requested a Restraining Order .
Conclusion: The court should:
not approve a Restraining Order because:
approve a Restraining Order because:
14. Fees and Costs
Each party should pay his or her own fees and costs.
This issue was decided in the Summary Judgment Order signed by the court on
(date): . (Skip to 15 .)
Lawyer’s fees were awarded in the Order after Sexual Assault Fact-Finding Hearing
and should be included in the Final Parentage Order.
(Name): incurred fees and costs, and needs help to
pay those fees and costs. (Name): has the
ability to help pay fees and costs and should be ordered to pay the amount as listed in
the Final Parentage Order . The court finds that the amount ordered is reasonable.
Fees for a guardian ad litem (GAL) or other court-appointed professional should be
paid as listed in the Final Parentage Order. The court has considered relevant factors
including each party’s ability to pay, and finds the fees as ordered are reasonable.
Other findings:
15. Other findings or conclusions (if any)
CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630
Mandatory Form (07/2017)
FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage
(after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision)
p. 9 of 10
Date Judge or Commissioner
Petitioner and Respondent/s or their lawyers fill out below.
This document (check any that apply) : This document (check any that apply) :
is an agreement of the parties is an agreement of the parties
is presented by me is presented by me
may be signed by the court without notice to me may be signed by the court without notice to me
Petitioner signs here or lawyer signs here + WSBA # Respondent signs here or lawyer signs here + WSBA #
Print Name Date Print Name Date
This document (check any that apply) : This document (check any that apply) :
is an agreement of the parties is an agreement of the parties
is presented by me is presented by me
may be signed by the court without notice to me may be signed by the court without notice to me
Other Respondent or lawyer signs here + WSBA # Other party or Guardian ad Litem signs here + WSBA #
Print Name Date Print Name Date
CR 52; RCW 26.26.130, .625, .630
Mandatory Form (07/2017)
FL Parentage 353 Findings & Conclusions About Parentage
(after Ackn. or earlier Court Decision)
p. 10 of 10
Valuable advice on preparing your ‘Washington Law’ online
Are you fed up with the inconvenience of handling paperwork? Look no further than airSlate SignNow, the leading electronic signature solution for individuals and enterprises. Bid farewell to the lengthy process of printing and scanning documents. With airSlate SignNow, you can effortlessly finalize and authorize paperwork online. Utilize the robust features embedded in this user-friendly and cost-effective platform and transform your methodology for document handling. Whether you need to authorize forms or collect eSignatures, airSlate SignNow manages it all efficiently, with just a few clicks.
Adhere to this comprehensive guide:
Sign in to your account or sign up for a free trial with our service.
Hit +Create to upload a file from your device, cloud, or our form library.
Open your ‘Washington Law’ in the editor.
Click Me (Fill Out Now) to prepare the document on your end.
Add and allocate fillable fields for others (if needed).
Continue with the Send Invite settings to request eSignatures from others.
Save, print your copy, or convert it into a reusable template.
No need to worry if you need to collaborate with others on your Washington Law or send it for notarization—our platform has everything you need to complete such tasks. Create an account with airSlate SignNow today and elevate your document management to a new standard!
FAQs
Here is a list of the most common customer questions. If you can’t find an answer to your question, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us.
airSlate SignNow is an electronic signature platform that allows businesses to send and eSign documents seamlessly. In the context of Washington Law, it ensures that all electronic signatures are legally binding and compliant with state regulations, making it a reliable choice for businesses operating in Washington.
airSlate SignNow is designed to comply with the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) and the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce (ESIGN) Act, both of which are recognized under Washington Law. This compliance guarantees that electronic signatures created through our platform have the same legal standing as traditional handwritten signatures.
airSlate SignNow offers flexible pricing plans to cater to various business needs, ensuring affordability while complying with Washington Law. Businesses can choose from monthly or annual subscriptions, with options ranging from basic to advanced features, all designed to enhance document management and signing efficiency.
airSlate SignNow features a user-friendly interface, customizable templates, and robust security measures to meet the needs of businesses in Washington. These features streamline document workflows, reduce turnaround times, and ensure compliance with Washington Law, enhancing overall productivity.
Yes, airSlate SignNow offers seamless integrations with various software solutions commonly used by businesses in Washington, such as CRM systems, cloud storage services, and productivity tools. This flexibility allows users to maintain their existing workflows while ensuring compliance with Washington Law.
Using airSlate SignNow for document signing in Washington offers numerous benefits, including increased efficiency, reduced paper usage, and enhanced security. By ensuring compliance with Washington Law, businesses can confidently manage their electronic signatures and streamline their document processes.
Absolutely! airSlate SignNow is an ideal solution for small businesses in Washington, offering cost-effective pricing plans and user-friendly features. By leveraging our platform, small businesses can comply with Washington Law while efficiently managing their document signing processes.
The best way to complete and sign your washington law form
Save time on document management with airSlate SignNow and get your washington law form eSigned quickly from anywhere with our fully compliant eSignature tool.
How to complete and sign paperwork online
In the past, working with paperwork took lots of time and effort. But with airSlate SignNow, document management is quick and simple. Our robust and user-friendly eSignature solution allows you to easily complete and electronically sign your washington law form online from any internet-connected device.
Follow the step-by-step guidelines to eSign your washington law form template online:
1.Sign up for a free trial with airSlate SignNow or log in to your account with password credentials or SSO authorization option.
2.Click Upload or Create and add a file for eSigning from your device, the cloud, or our form catalogue.
3.Click on the document name to open it in the editor and utilize the left-side menu to complete all the empty areas accordingly.
4.Place the My Signature field where you need to eSign your form. Type your name, draw, or upload an image of your regular signature.
5.Click Save and Close to finish editing your completed document.
Once your washington law form template is ready, download it to your device, export it to the cloud, or invite other parties to electronically sign it. With airSlate SignNow, the eSigning process only takes a couple of clicks. Use our powerful eSignature tool wherever you are to deal with your paperwork effectively!
How to fill out and sign paperwork in Google Chrome
Completing and signing documents is simple with the airSlate SignNow extension for Google Chrome. Adding it to your browser is a quick and productive way to manage your forms online. Sign your washington law form template with a legally-binding electronic signature in just a few clicks without switching between tools and tabs.
Follow the step-by-step guide to eSign your washington law form in Google Chrome:
1.Navigate to the Chrome Web Store, search for the airSlate SignNow extension for Chrome, and add it to your browser.
2.Right-click on the link to a document you need to approve and select Open in airSlate SignNow.
3.Log in to your account with your credentials or Google/Facebook sign-in option. If you don’t have one, you can start a free trial.
4.Use the Edit & Sign menu on the left to fill out your template, then drag and drop the My Signature option.
5.Add an image of your handwritten signature, draw it, or simply type in your full name to eSign.
6.Make sure all the details are correct and click Save and Close to finish modifying your form.
Now, you can save your washington law form sample to your device or cloud storage, email the copy to other individuals, or invite them to electronically sign your document via an email request or a protected Signing Link. The airSlate SignNow extension for Google Chrome improves your document workflows with minimum time and effort. Start using airSlate SignNow today!
How to complete and sign paperwork in Gmail
Every time you get an email with the washington law form for signing, there’s no need to print and scan a document or download and re-upload it to a different program. There’s a much better solution if you use Gmail. Try the airSlate SignNow add-on to quickly eSign any paperwork right from your inbox.
Follow the step-by-step guide to eSign your washington law form in Gmail:
2.Install the tool with a related button and grant the tool access to your Google account.
3.Open an email containing an attachment that needs approval and utilize the S symbol on the right sidebar to launch the add-on.
4.Log in to your airSlate SignNow account. Select Send to Sign to forward the document to other parties for approval or click Upload to open it in the editor.
5.Put the My Signature option where you need to eSign: type, draw, or import your signature.
This eSigning process saves efforts and only requires a couple of clicks. Utilize the airSlate SignNow add-on for Gmail to update your washington law form with fillable fields, sign documents legally, and invite other people to eSign them al without leaving your mailbox. Improve your signature workflows now!
How to fill out and sign forms in a mobile browser
Need to quickly complete and sign your washington law form on a smartphone while doing your work on the go? airSlate SignNow can help without the need to install additional software programs. Open our airSlate SignNow tool from any browser on your mobile device and create legally-binding eSignatures on the go, 24/7.
Follow the step-by-step guide to eSign your washington law form in a browser:
1.Open any browser on your device and go to the www.signnow.com
2.Register for an account with a free trial or log in with your password credentials or SSO option.
3.Click Upload or Create and pick a file that needs to be completed from a cloud, your device, or our form catalogue with ready-made templates.
4.Open the form and fill out the blank fields with tools from Edit & Sign menu on the left.
5.Add the My Signature area to the sample, then type in your name, draw, or add your signature.
In a few simple clicks, your washington law form is completed from wherever you are. When you're done with editing, you can save the file on your device, build a reusable template for it, email it to other people, or ask them to electronically sign it. Make your paperwork on the go speedy and productive with airSlate SignNow!
How to complete and sign documents on iOS
In today’s business world, tasks must be completed rapidly even when you’re away from your computer. With the airSlate SignNow mobile app, you can organize your paperwork and approve your washington law form with a legally-binding eSignature right on your iPhone or iPad. Install it on your device to close deals and manage documents from just about anywhere 24/7.
Follow the step-by-step guidelines to eSign your washington law form on iOS devices:
1.Open the App Store, find the airSlate SignNow app by airSlate, and install it on your device.
2.Launch the application, tap Create to upload a form, and choose Myself.
3.Opt for Signature at the bottom toolbar and simply draw your signature with a finger or stylus to eSign the sample.
4.Tap Done -> Save right after signing the sample.
5.Tap Save or take advantage of the Make Template option to re-use this paperwork later on.
This method is so straightforward your washington law form is completed and signed in just a few taps. The airSlate SignNow app works in the cloud so all the forms on your mobile device remain in your account and are available whenever you need them. Use airSlate SignNow for iOS to improve your document management and eSignature workflows!
How to fill out and sign paperwork on Android
With airSlate SignNow, it’s simple to sign your washington law form on the go. Set up its mobile app for Android OS on your device and start improving eSignature workflows right on your smartphone or tablet.
Follow the step-by-step guidelines to eSign your washington law form on Android:
1.Open Google Play, search for the airSlate SignNow application from airSlate, and install it on your device.
2.Sign in to your account or register it with a free trial, then add a file with a ➕ key on the bottom of you screen.
3.Tap on the uploaded file and choose Open in Editor from the dropdown menu.
4.Tap on Tools tab -> Signature, then draw or type your name to eSign the sample. Fill out empty fields with other tools on the bottom if needed.
5.Use the ✔ button, then tap on the Save option to finish editing.
With an intuitive interface and total compliance with major eSignature laws and regulations, the airSlate SignNow application is the best tool for signing your washington law form. It even operates without internet and updates all document modifications once your internet connection is restored and the tool is synced. Complete and eSign documents, send them for eSigning, and create multi-usable templates anytime and from anyplace with airSlate SignNow.
We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience, enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our 3rd party partners) and for other business use. Click here to read our Cookie Policy. By clicking “Accept“ you agree to the use of cookies.... Read moreRead less
