Can i industry sign banking idaho form simple
THAT'S THAT'S THE THAT'S THE MESSAGE THAT'S THE MESSAGE A NEW NEW GROUP NEW GROUP OF NEW GROUP OF IDAHO NEW GROUP OF IDAHO
LEGAL NEW GROUP OF IDAHO
LEGAL EXPERTS NEW GROUP OF IDAHO
LEGAL EXPERTS IS NEW GROUP OF IDAHO
LEGAL EXPERTS IS
SENDING NEW GROUP OF IDAHO
LEGAL EXPERTS IS
SENDING TO NEW GROUP OF IDAHO
LEGAL EXPERTS IS
SENDING TO THE NEW GROUP OF IDAHO
LEGAL EXPERTS IS
SENDING TO THE IDAHO LEGAL EXPERTS IS
SENDING TO THE IDAHO LEGAL EXPERTS IS
SENDING TO THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE. SENDING TO THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE. SENDING TO THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE.
WE'VE SENDING TO THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE.
WE'VE TALKED SENDING TO THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE.
WE'VE TALKED ON SENDING TO THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE.
WE'VE TALKED ON THE SENDING TO THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE.
WE'VE TALKED ON THE 208 LEGISLATURE.
WE'VE TALKED ON THE 208 LEGISLATURE.
WE'VE TALKED ON THE 208
ABOUT LEGISLATURE.
WE'VE TALKED ON THE 208
ABOUT THE LEGISLATURE.
WE'VE TALKED ON THE 208
ABOUT THE STATE WE'VE TALKED ON THE 208
ABOUT THE STATE WE'VE TALKED ON THE 208
ABOUT THE STATE
LEGISLATURE'S WE'VE TALKED ON THE 208
ABOUT THE STATE
LEGISLATURE'S RECORD WE'VE TALKED ON THE 208
ABOUT THE STATE
LEGISLATURE'S RECORD OF ABOUT THE STATE
LEGISLATURE'S RECORD OF LEGISLATURE'S RECORD OF PASSING PASSING BILLS PASSING BILLS THAT PASSING BILLS THAT THE PASSING BILLS THAT THE
ATTORNEY PASSING BILLS THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S PASSING BILLS THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE PASSING BILLS THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE SAY PASSING BILLS THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE SAY ARE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE SAY ARE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE SAY ARE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. OFFICE SAY ARE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. OFFICE SAY ARE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
AS OFFICE SAY ARE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
AS A OFFICE SAY ARE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
AS A RESULT, OFFICE SAY ARE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
AS A RESULT, THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
AS A RESULT, THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
AS A RESULT, THE
LEGISLATION UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
AS A RESULT, THE
LEGISLATION OFTEN UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
AS A RESULT, THE
LEGISLATION OFTEN ENDS AS A RESULT, THE
LEGISLATION OFTEN ENDS AS A RESULT, THE
LEGISLATION OFTEN ENDS
UP AS A RESULT, THE
LEGISLATION OFTEN ENDS
UP BEING AS A RESULT, THE
LEGISLATION OFTEN ENDS
UP BEING CHALLENGED AS A RESULT, THE
LEGISLATION OFTEN ENDS
UP BEING CHALLENGED IN LEGISLATION OFTEN ENDS
UP BEING CHALLENGED IN LEGISLATION OFTEN ENDS
UP BEING CHALLENGED IN
COURT... LEGISLATION OFTEN ENDS
UP BEING CHALLENGED IN
COURT... COSTING LEGISLATION OFTEN ENDS
UP BEING CHALLENGED IN
COURT... COSTING IDAHO UP BEING CHALLENGED IN
COURT... COSTING IDAHO UP BEING CHALLENGED IN
COURT... COSTING IDAHO
TAX UP BEING CHALLENGED IN
COURT... COSTING IDAHO
TAX PAYERS UP BEING CHALLENGED IN
COURT... COSTING IDAHO
TAX PAYERS MILLIONS UP BEING CHALLENGED IN
COURT... COSTING IDAHO
TAX PAYERS MILLIONS OF COURT... COSTING IDAHO
TAX PAYERS MILLIONS OF COURT... COSTING IDAHO
TAX PAYERS MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS COURT... COSTING IDAHO
TAX PAYERS MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS OVER COURT... COSTING IDAHO
TAX PAYERS MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS OVER THE TAX PAYERS MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS OVER THE TAX PAYERS MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS OVER THE
YEARS. DOLLARS OVER THE
YEARS. DOLLARS OVER THE
YEARS.
THIS DOLLARS OVER THE
YEARS.
THIS GROUP DOLLARS OVER THE
YEARS.
THIS GROUP SAYS DOLLARS OVER THE
YEARS.
THIS GROUP SAYS IT'S YEARS.
THIS GROUP SAYS IT'S YEARS.
THIS GROUP SAYS IT'S
TIME YEARS.
THIS GROUP SAYS IT'S
TIME THE YEARS.
THIS GROUP SAYS IT'S
TIME THE TREND YEARS.
THIS GROUP SAYS IT'S
TIME THE TREND IS THIS GROUP SAYS IT'S
TIME THE TREND IS THIS GROUP SAYS IT'S
TIME THE TREND IS
STOPPED. TIME THE TREND IS
STOPPED. TIME THE TREND IS
STOPPED.
JOE TIME THE TREND IS
STOPPED.
JOE PARRIS TIME THE TREND IS
STOPPED.
JOE PARRIS SPOKE TIME THE TREND IS
STOPPED.
JOE PARRIS SPOKE WITH TIME THE TREND IS
STOPPED.
JOE PARRIS SPOKE WITH A STOPPED.
JOE PARRIS SPOKE WITH A STOPPED.
JOE PARRIS SPOKE WITH A
LEADER STOPPED.
JOE PARRIS SPOKE WITH A
LEADER OF STOPPED.
JOE PARRIS SPOKE WITH A
LEADER OF THE JOE PARRIS SPOKE WITH A
LEADER OF THE JOE PARRIS SPOKE WITH A
LEADER OF THE
COMMITTEE JOE PARRIS SPOKE WITH A
LEADER OF THE
COMMITTEE TO JOE PARRIS SPOKE WITH A
LEADER OF THE
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT LEADER OF THE
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT LEADER OF THE
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND LEADER OF THE
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE LEADER OF THE
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE THE LEADER OF THE
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION ABOUT AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION ABOUT AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION ABOUT
THEIR AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION ABOUT
THEIR GROUP AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION ABOUT
THEIR GROUP AND AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION ABOUT
THEIR GROUP AND PLAN CONSTITUTION ABOUT
THEIR GROUP AND PLAN CONSTITUTION ABOUT
THEIR GROUP AND PLAN
OF CONSTITUTION ABOUT
THEIR GROUP AND PLAN
OF ACTION. THEIR GROUP AND PLAN
OF ACTION. THEIR GROUP AND PLAN
OF ACTION.
"THERE THEIR GROUP AND PLAN
OF ACTION.
"THERE HAS THEIR GROUP AND PLAN
OF ACTION.
"THERE HAS BEEN THEIR GROUP AND PLAN
OF ACTION.
"THERE HAS BEEN AN OF ACTION.
"THERE HAS BEEN AN OF ACTION.
"THERE HAS BEEN AN
UNPRECEDENTED OF ACTION.
"THERE HAS BEEN AN
UNPRECEDENTED EFFORT "THERE HAS BEEN AN
UNPRECEDENTED EFFORT "THERE HAS BEEN AN
UNPRECEDENTED EFFORT
BY "THERE HAS BEEN AN
UNPRECEDENTED EFFORT
BY THE "THERE HAS BEEN AN
UNPRECEDENTED EFFORT
BY THE IDAHO UNPRECEDENTED EFFORT
BY THE IDAHO UNPRECEDENTED EFFORT
BY THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE UNPRECEDENTED EFFORT
BY THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE THIS BY THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE THIS BY THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE THIS
SESSION BY THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE THIS
SESSION TO BY THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE THIS
SESSION TO IGNORE BY THE IDAHO
LEGISLATURE THIS
SESSION TO IGNORE THE LEGISLATURE THIS
SESSION TO IGNORE THE LEGISLATURE THIS
SESSION TO IGNORE THE
CONSTITUTION." SESSION TO IGNORE THE
CONSTITUTION." SESSION TO IGNORE THE
CONSTITUTION."
AS SESSION TO IGNORE THE
CONSTITUTION."
AS HE SESSION TO IGNORE THE
CONSTITUTION."
AS HE FOLLOWED SESSION TO IGNORE THE
CONSTITUTION."
AS HE FOLLOWED THE CONSTITUTION."
AS HE FOLLOWED THE AS HE FOLLOWED THE 2021 2021 LEGISLATIVE 2021 LEGISLATIVE
SESSION, 2021 LEGISLATIVE
SESSION, JIM 2021 LEGISLATIVE
SESSION, JIM JONES, 2021 LEGISLATIVE
SESSION, JIM JONES,
RETIRED 2021 LEGISLATIVE
SESSION, JIM JONES,
RETIRED CHIEF 2021 LEGISLATIVE
SESSION, JIM JONES,
RETIRED CHIEF JUSTICE 2021 LEGISLATIVE
SESSION, JIM JONES,
RETIRED CHIEF JUSTICE OF SESSION, JIM JONES,
RETIRED CHIEF JUSTICE OF SESSION, JIM JONES,
RETIRED CHIEF JUSTICE OF
THE SESSION, JIM JONES,
RETIRED CHIEF JUSTICE OF
THE IDAHO SESSION, JIM JONES,
RETIRED CHIEF JUSTICE OF
THE IDAHO SUPREME RETIRED CHIEF JUSTICE OF
THE IDAHO SUPREME RETIRED CHIEF JUSTICE OF
THE IDAHO SUPREME
COURT, RETIRED CHIEF JUSTICE OF
THE IDAHO SUPREME
COURT, SAYS RETIRED CHIEF JUSTICE OF
THE IDAHO SUPREME
COURT, SAYS HE RETIRED CHIEF JUSTICE OF
THE IDAHO SUPREME
COURT, SAYS HE STARTED THE IDAHO SUPREME
COURT, SAYS HE STARTED THE IDAHO SUPREME
COURT, SAYS HE STARTED
TO THE IDAHO SUPREME
COURT, SAYS HE STARTED
TO HAVE THE IDAHO SUPREME
COURT, SAYS HE STARTED
TO HAVE CONCERNS THE IDAHO SUPREME
COURT, SAYS HE STARTED
TO HAVE CONCERNS AS COURT, SAYS HE STARTED
TO HAVE CONCERNS AS TO HAVE CONCERNS AS HE HE WATCHED HE WATCHED LEGISLATION HE WATCHED LEGISLATION
THAT HE WATCHED LEGISLATION
THAT HE HE WATCHED LEGISLATION
THAT HE BELIEVES HE WATCHED LEGISLATION
THAT HE BELIEVES IS HE WATCHED LEGISLATION
THAT HE BELIEVES IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL THAT HE BELIEVES IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL THAT HE BELIEVES IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
ADVANCE THAT HE BELIEVES IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
ADVANCE AT THAT HE BELIEVES IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
ADVANCE AT THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
ADVANCE AT THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
ADVANCE AT THE
STATEHOUSE. UNCONSTITUTIONAL
ADVANCE AT THE
STATEHOUSE. HE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
ADVANCE AT THE
STATEHOUSE. HE SAYS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
ADVANCE AT THE
STATEHOUSE. HE SAYS HE ADVANCE AT THE
STATEHOUSE. HE SAYS HE ADVANCE AT THE
STATEHOUSE. HE SAYS HE
FINALLY ADVANCE AT THE
STATEHOUSE. HE SAYS HE
FINALLY HAD ADVANCE AT THE
STATEHOUSE. HE SAYS HE
FINALLY HAD ENOUGH STATEHOUSE. HE SAYS HE
FINALLY HAD ENOUGH STATEHOUSE. HE SAYS HE
FINALLY HAD ENOUGH
AND STATEHOUSE. HE SAYS HE
FINALLY HAD ENOUGH
AND HAD STATEHOUSE. HE SAYS HE
FINALLY HAD ENOUGH
AND HAD A STATEHOUSE. HE SAYS HE
FINALLY HAD ENOUGH
AND HAD A THOUGHT. FINALLY HAD ENOUGH
AND HAD A THOUGHT. FINALLY HAD ENOUGH
AND HAD A THOUGHT.
"MAYBE FINALLY HAD ENOUGH
AND HAD A THOUGHT.
"MAYBE WE FINALLY HAD ENOUGH
AND HAD A THOUGHT.
"MAYBE WE NEED FINALLY HAD ENOUGH
AND HAD A THOUGHT.
"MAYBE WE NEED TO FINALLY HAD ENOUGH
AND HAD A THOUGHT.
"MAYBE WE NEED TO GET AND HAD A THOUGHT.
"MAYBE WE NEED TO GET AND HAD A THOUGHT.
"MAYBE WE NEED TO GET
SOME AND HAD A THOUGHT.
"MAYBE WE NEED TO GET
SOME LAWYERS AND HAD A THOUGHT.
"MAYBE WE NEED TO GET
SOME LAWYERS TOGETHER "MAYBE WE NEED TO GET
SOME LAWYERS TOGETHER "MAYBE WE NEED TO GET
SOME LAWYERS TOGETHER
TO "MAYBE WE NEED TO GET
SOME LAWYERS TOGETHER
TO RESIST "MAYBE WE NEED TO GET
SOME LAWYERS TOGETHER
TO RESIST IT." SOME LAWYERS TOGETHER
TO RESIST IT." SOME LAWYERS TOGETHER
TO RESIST IT."
HE SOME LAWYERS TOGETHER
TO RESIST IT."
HE FOUND SOME LAWYERS TOGETHER
TO RESIST IT."
HE FOUND VETERAN TO RESIST IT."
HE FOUND VETERAN TO RESIST IT."
HE FOUND VETERAN
LEGAL TO RESIST IT."
HE FOUND VETERAN
LEGAL EXPERTS TO RESIST IT."
HE FOUND VETERAN
LEGAL EXPERTS THAT HE FOUND VETERAN
LEGAL EXPERTS THAT HE FOUND VETERAN
LEGAL EXPERTS THAT
SHARED HE FOUND VETERAN
LEGAL EXPERTS THAT
SHARED HIS HE FOUND VETERAN
LEGAL EXPERTS THAT
SHARED HIS OPINION HE FOUND VETERAN
LEGAL EXPERTS THAT
SHARED HIS OPINION AND LEGAL EXPERTS THAT
SHARED HIS OPINION AND LEGAL EXPERTS THAT
SHARED HIS OPINION AND
THUS LEGAL EXPERTS THAT
SHARED HIS OPINION AND
THUS A LEGAL EXPERTS THAT
SHARED HIS OPINION AND
THUS A GROUP LEGAL EXPERTS THAT
SHARED HIS OPINION AND
THUS A GROUP WAS SHARED HIS OPINION AND
THUS A GROUP WAS SHARED HIS OPINION AND
THUS A GROUP WAS
CREATED. THUS A GROUP WAS
CREATED. THUS A GROUP WAS
CREATED.
"IT'S THUS A GROUP WAS
CREATED.
"IT'S THE THUS A GROUP WAS
CREATED.
"IT'S THE COMMITTEE THUS A GROUP WAS
CREATED.
"IT'S THE COMMITTEE TO CREATED.
"IT'S THE COMMITTEE TO CREATED.
"IT'S THE COMMITTEE TO
PROTECT CREATED.
"IT'S THE COMMITTEE TO
PROTECT AND CREATED.
"IT'S THE COMMITTEE TO
PROTECT AND PRESERVE "IT'S THE COMMITTEE TO
PROTECT AND PRESERVE "IT'S THE COMMITTEE TO
PROTECT AND PRESERVE
THE "IT'S THE COMMITTEE TO
PROTECT AND PRESERVE
THE IDAHO PROTECT AND PRESERVE
THE IDAHO PROTECT AND PRESERVE
THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION." THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION." THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION."
SINCE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION."
SINCE 2004 THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION."
SINCE 2004 THE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION."
SINCE 2004 THE STATE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION."
SINCE 2004 THE STATE OF CONSTITUTION."
SINCE 2004 THE STATE OF CONSTITUTION."
SINCE 2004 THE STATE OF
IDAHO CONSTITUTION."
SINCE 2004 THE STATE OF
IDAHO HAS CONSTITUTION."
SINCE 2004 THE STATE OF
IDAHO HAS LOST CONSTITUTION."
SINCE 2004 THE STATE OF
IDAHO HAS LOST EIGHT SINCE 2004 THE STATE OF
IDAHO HAS LOST EIGHT SINCE 2004 THE STATE OF
IDAHO HAS LOST EIGHT
CASES SINCE 2004 THE STATE OF
IDAHO HAS LOST EIGHT
CASES INVOLVING SINCE 2004 THE STATE OF
IDAHO HAS LOST EIGHT
CASES INVOLVING A SINCE 2004 THE STATE OF
IDAHO HAS LOST EIGHT
CASES INVOLVING A LAW IDAHO HAS LOST EIGHT
CASES INVOLVING A LAW IDAHO HAS LOST EIGHT
CASES INVOLVING A LAW
PASSED IDAHO HAS LOST EIGHT
CASES INVOLVING A LAW
PASSED BY IDAHO HAS LOST EIGHT
CASES INVOLVING A LAW
PASSED BY THE IDAHO HAS LOST EIGHT
CASES INVOLVING A LAW
PASSED BY THE STATE CASES INVOLVING A LAW
PASSED BY THE STATE CASES INVOLVING A LAW
PASSED BY THE STATE
LEGISLATURE CASES INVOLVING A LAW
PASSED BY THE STATE
LEGISLATURE THAT CASES INVOLVING A LAW
PASSED BY THE STATE
LEGISLATURE THAT WAS PASSED BY THE STATE
LEGISLATURE THAT WAS PASSED BY THE STATE
LEGISLATURE THAT WAS
CHALLENGED PASSED BY THE STATE
LEGISLATURE THAT WAS
CHALLENGED FOR PASSED BY THE STATE
LEGISLATURE THAT WAS
CHALLENGED FOR BEING LEGISLATURE THAT WAS
CHALLENGED FOR BEING LEGISLATURE THAT WAS
CHALLENGED FOR BEING
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. LEGISLATURE THAT WAS
CHALLENGED FOR BEING
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AT CHALLENGED FOR BEING
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AT CHALLENGED FOR BEING
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AT
LEAST CHALLENGED FOR BEING
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AT
LEAST ONE CHALLENGED FOR BEING
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AT
LEAST ONE BILL CHALLENGED FOR BEING
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AT
LEAST ONE BILL PASSED UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AT
LEAST ONE BILL PASSED UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AT
LEAST ONE BILL PASSED
DURING UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AT
LEAST ONE BILL PASSED
DURING LAST UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AT
LEAST ONE BILL PASSED
DURING LAST SESSION UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AT
LEAST ONE BILL PASSED
DURING LAST SESSION IS LEAST ONE BILL PASSED
DURING LAST SESSION IS LEAST ONE BILL PASSED
DURING LAST SESSION IS
ALSO LEAST ONE BILL PASSED
DURING LAST SESSION IS
ALSO CURRENTLY LEAST ONE BILL PASSED
DURING LAST SESSION IS
ALSO CURRENTLY IN DURING LAST SESSION IS
ALSO CURRENTLY IN DURING LAST SESSION IS
ALSO CURRENTLY IN
LEGAL DURING LAST SESSION IS
ALSO CURRENTLY IN
LEGAL LIMBO. DURING LAST SESSION IS
ALSO CURRENTLY IN
LEGAL LIMBO. ALL DURING LAST SESSION IS
ALSO CURRENTLY IN
LEGAL LIMBO. ALL LEGAL ALSO CURRENTLY IN
LEGAL LIMBO. ALL LEGAL ALSO CURRENTLY IN
LEGAL LIMBO. ALL LEGAL
FEES ALSO CURRENTLY IN
LEGAL LIMBO. ALL LEGAL
FEES ARE ALSO CURRENTLY IN
LEGAL LIMBO. ALL LEGAL
FEES ARE PAID ALSO CURRENTLY IN
LEGAL LIMBO. ALL LEGAL
FEES ARE PAID BY ALSO CURRENTLY IN
LEGAL LIMBO. ALL LEGAL
FEES ARE PAID BY IDAHO LEGAL LIMBO. ALL LEGAL
FEES ARE PAID BY IDAHO LEGAL LIMBO. ALL LEGAL
FEES ARE PAID BY IDAHO
TAXPAYER LEGAL LIMBO. ALL LEGAL
FEES ARE PAID BY IDAHO
TAXPAYER DOLLARS LEGAL LIMBO. ALL LEGAL
FEES ARE PAID BY IDAHO
TAXPAYER DOLLARS OUT FEES ARE PAID BY IDAHO
TAXPAYER DOLLARS OUT FEES ARE PAID BY IDAHO
TAXPAYER DOLLARS OUT
OF FEES ARE PAID BY IDAHO
TAXPAYER DOLLARS OUT
OF THE FEES ARE PAID BY IDAHO
TAXPAYER DOLLARS OUT
OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL TAXPAYER DOLLARS OUT
OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL TAXPAYER DOLLARS OUT
OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE TAXPAYER DOLLARS OUT
OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND, TAXPAYER DOLLARS OUT
OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND, CREATED OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND, CREATED OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND, CREATED
IN OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND, CREATED
IN 1995 OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND, CREATED
IN 1995 TO OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND, CREATED
IN 1995 TO DEFEND OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND, CREATED
IN 1995 TO DEFEND THE DEFENSE FUND, CREATED
IN 1995 TO DEFEND THE DEFENSE FUND, CREATED
IN 1995 TO DEFEND THE
STATE'S DEFENSE FUND, CREATED
IN 1995 TO DEFEND THE
STATE'S LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, CREATED
IN 1995 TO DEFEND THE
STATE'S LEGAL RIGHTS IN 1995 TO DEFEND THE
STATE'S LEGAL RIGHTS IN 1995 TO DEFEND THE
STATE'S LEGAL RIGHTS
AGAINST IN 1995 TO DEFEND THE
STATE'S LEGAL RIGHTS
AGAINST THE IN 1995 TO DEFEND THE
STATE'S LEGAL RIGHTS
AGAINST THE FEDERAL STATE'S LEGAL RIGHTS
AGAINST THE FEDERAL STATE'S LEGAL RIGHTS
AGAINST THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT. AGAINST THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT. AGAINST THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT.
"YEAH, AGAINST THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT.
"YEAH, OVER AGAINST THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT.
"YEAH, OVER $3 AGAINST THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT.
"YEAH, OVER $3 MILLION GOVERNMENT.
"YEAH, OVER $3 MILLION GOVERNMENT.
"YEAH, OVER $3 MILLION
HAVE GOVERNMENT.
"YEAH, OVER $3 MILLION
HAVE GONE GOVERNMENT.
"YEAH, OVER $3 MILLION
HAVE GONE OUT GOVERNMENT.
"YEAH, OVER $3 MILLION
HAVE GONE OUT TO "YEAH, OVER $3 MILLION
HAVE GONE OUT TO "YEAH, OVER $3 MILLION
HAVE GONE OUT TO
DEFEND HAVE GONE OUT TO
DEFEND HAVE GONE OUT TO
DEFEND
UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEFEND
UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEFEND
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILLS. DEFEND
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILLS. I DEFEND
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILLS. I DON'T DEFEND
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILLS. I DON'T KNOW DEFEND
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILLS. I DON'T KNOW WHY UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILLS. I DON'T KNOW WHY UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILLS. I DON'T KNOW WHY
THEY UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILLS. I DON'T KNOW WHY
THEY CALL UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILLS. I DON'T KNOW WHY
THEY CALL IT UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILLS. I DON'T KNOW WHY
THEY CALL IT THE BILLS. I DON'T KNOW WHY
THEY CALL IT THE BILLS. I DON'T KNOW WHY
THEY CALL IT THE
CONSTITUTIONAL THEY CALL IT THE
CONSTITUTIONAL THEY CALL IT THE
CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE THEY CALL IT THE
CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND THEY CALL IT THE
CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND I THEY CALL IT THE
CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND I THINK CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND I THINK CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND I THINK
THEY CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND I THINK
THEY OUGHT CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND I THINK
THEY OUGHT TO CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND I THINK
THEY OUGHT TO CALL CONSTITUTIONAL
DEFENSE FUND I THINK
THEY OUGHT TO CALL IT DEFENSE FUND I THINK
THEY OUGHT TO CALL IT DEFENSE FUND I THINK
THEY OUGHT TO CALL IT
THE DEFENSE FUND I THINK
THEY OUGHT TO CALL IT
THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL THEY OUGHT TO CALL IT
THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL THEY OUGHT TO CALL IT
THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILL THEY OUGHT TO CALL IT
THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILL DEFENSE THEY OUGHT TO CALL IT
THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILL DEFENSE FUND." THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILL DEFENSE FUND." THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILL DEFENSE FUND."
THE THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILL DEFENSE FUND."
THE COMMITTEE, THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BILL DEFENSE FUND."
THE COMMITTEE, WHICH BILL DEFENSE FUND."
THE COMMITTEE, WHICH BILL DEFENSE FUND."
THE COMMITTEE, WHICH
INCLUDES BILL DEFENSE FUND."
THE COMMITTEE, WHICH
INCLUDES TWO BILL DEFENSE FUND."
THE COMMITTEE, WHICH
INCLUDES TWO FORMER THE COMMITTEE, WHICH
INCLUDES TWO FORMER THE COMMITTEE, WHICH
INCLUDES TWO FORMER
IDAHO THE COMMITTEE, WHICH
INCLUDES TWO FORMER
IDAHO ATTORNEYS INCLUDES TWO FORMER
IDAHO ATTORNEYS INCLUDES TWO FORMER
IDAHO ATTORNEYS
GENERAL, INCLUDES TWO FORMER
IDAHO ATTORNEYS
GENERAL, A INCLUDES TWO FORMER
IDAHO ATTORNEYS
GENERAL, A FORMER IDAHO ATTORNEYS
GENERAL, A FORMER IDAHO ATTORNEYS
GENERAL, A FORMER
DEPUTY IDAHO ATTORNEYS
GENERAL, A FORMER
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, A FORMER
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, A FORMER
DEPUTY ATTORNEY
GENERAL, GENERAL, A FORMER
DEPUTY ATTORNEY
GENERAL, AND GENERAL, A FORMER
DEPUTY ATTORNEY
GENERAL, AND SENIOR DEPUTY ATTORNEY
GENERAL, AND SENIOR DEPUTY ATTORNEY
GENERAL, AND SENIOR
LAWYER DEPUTY ATTORNEY
GENERAL, AND SENIOR
LAWYER OF DEPUTY ATTORNEY
GENERAL, AND SENIOR
LAWYER OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY
GENERAL, AND SENIOR
LAWYER OF THE IDAHO GENERAL, AND SENIOR
LAWYER OF THE IDAHO GENERAL, AND SENIOR
LAWYER OF THE IDAHO
BAR GENERAL, AND SENIOR
LAWYER OF THE IDAHO
BAR AIM GENERAL, AND SENIOR
LAWYER OF THE IDAHO
BAR AIM TO GENERAL, AND SENIOR
LAWYER OF THE IDAHO
BAR AIM TO WORK GENERAL, AND SENIOR
LAWYER OF THE IDAHO
BAR AIM TO WORK AS GENERAL, AND SENIOR
LAWYER OF THE IDAHO
BAR AIM TO WORK AS A LAWYER OF THE IDAHO
BAR AIM TO WORK AS A LAWYER OF THE IDAHO
BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG LAWYER OF THE IDAHO
BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG GROUP. BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG GROUP. BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING TO, WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING TO, WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, BLOW WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE "WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE "WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE
WHISTLE "WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE
WHISTLE WHEN "WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE
WHISTLE WHEN THE NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE
WHISTLE WHEN THE NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE
WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE
WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE STARTS WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE STARTS WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING LEGISLATION LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING LEGISLATION LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT WOULD LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT WOULD VIOLATE MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT WOULD VIOLATE MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS OF MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS OF THE THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS OF THE THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS OF THE
WHISTLE THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS OF THE
WHISTLE WHEN THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS OF THE
WHISTLE WHEN THE PROVISIONS OF THE
WHISTLE WHEN THE PROVISIONS OF THE
WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE PROVISIONS OF THE
WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE STARTS WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE STARTS WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING LEGISLATION LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING LEGISLATION MOVING LEGISLATION BAR BAR AIM BAR AIM TO BAR AIM TO WORK BAR AIM TO WORK AS BAR AIM TO WORK AS A BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG GROUP. BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING BAR AIM TO WORK AS A
WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING TO, WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING TO, WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, BLOW WATCHDOG GROUP.
"WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE "WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE "WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE
WHISTLE "WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE
WHISTLE WHEN "WE ARE GOING TO,
NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE
WHISTLE WHEN THE NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE
WHISTLE WHEN THE NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE
WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE NUMBER ONE, BLOW THE
WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE STARTS WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE STARTS WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING WHISTLE WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING LEGISLATION LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING LEGISLATION LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT WOULD LEGISLATURE STARTS
MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT WOULD VIOLATE MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT WOULD VIOLATE MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS OF MOVING LEGISLATION
THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS OF THE THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS OF THE THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS OF THE
CONSTITUTION THAT WOULD VIOLATE
PROVISIONS OF THE
CONSTITUTION AND PROVISIONS OF THE
CONSTITUTION AND PROVISIONS OF THE
CONSTITUTION AND
SECONDLY, PROVISIONS OF THE
CONSTITUTION AND
SECONDLY, IF PROVISIONS OF THE
CONSTITUTION AND
SECONDLY, IF NEED PROVISIONS OF THE
CONSTITUTION AND
SECONDLY, IF NEED BE, PROVISIONS OF THE
CONSTITUTION AND
SECONDLY, IF NEED BE, GO CONSTITUTION AND
SECONDLY, IF NEED BE, GO CONSTITUTION AND
SECONDLY, IF NEED BE, GO
INTO CONSTITUTION AND
SECONDLY, IF NEED BE, GO
INTO A CONSTITUTION AND
SECONDLY, IF NEED BE, GO
INTO A COURT CONSTITUTION AND
SECONDLY, IF NEED BE, GO
INTO A COURT ROOM CONSTITUTION AND
SECONDLY, IF NEED BE, GO
INTO A COURT ROOM TO SECONDLY, IF NEED BE, GO
INTO A COURT ROOM TO SECONDLY, IF NEED BE, GO
INTO A COURT ROOM TO
OPPOSE SECONDLY, IF NEED BE, GO
INTO A COURT ROOM TO
OPPOSE THOSE SECONDLY, IF NEED BE, GO
INTO A COURT ROOM TO
OPPOSE THOSE EFFORTS." INTO A COURT ROOM TO
OPPOSE THOSE EFFORTS." INTO A COURT ROOM TO
OPPOSE THOSE EFFORTS."
SO INTO A COURT ROOM TO
OPPOSE THOSE EFFORTS."
SO FAR, INTO A COURT ROOM TO
OPPOSE THOSE EFFORTS."
SO FAR, THE INTO A COURT ROOM TO
OPPOSE THOSE EFFORTS."
SO FAR, THE COMMITTEE OPPOSE THOSE EFFORTS."
SO FAR, THE COMMITTEE OPPOSE THOSE EFFORTS."
SO FAR, THE COMMITTEE
HAS OPPOSE THOSE EFFORTS."
SO FAR, THE COMMITTEE
HAS IDENTIFIED OPPOSE THOSE EFFORTS."
SO FAR, THE COMMITTEE
HAS IDENTIFIED AT OPPOSE THOSE EFFORTS."
SO FAR, THE COMMITTEE
HAS IDENTIFIED AT LEAST SO FAR, THE COMMITTEE
HAS IDENTIFIED AT LEAST SO FAR, THE COMMITTEE
HAS IDENTIFIED AT LEAST
FIVE SO FAR, THE COMMITTEE
HAS IDENTIFIED AT LEAST
FIVE PIECES SO FAR, THE COMMITTEE
HAS IDENTIFIED AT LEAST
FIVE PIECES OF HAS IDENTIFIED AT LEAST
FIVE PIECES OF HAS IDENTIFIED AT LEAST
FIVE PIECES OF
LEGISLATION HAS IDENTIFIED AT LEAST
FIVE PIECES OF
LEGISLATION THIS FIVE PIECES OF
LEGISLATION THIS FIVE PIECES OF
LEGISLATION THIS
SESSION FIVE PIECES OF
LEGISLATION THIS
SESSION THAT FIVE PIECES OF
LEGISLATION THIS
SESSION THAT THEY LEGISLATION THIS
SESSION THAT THEY LEGISLATION THIS
SESSION THAT THEY
BELIEVE LEGISLATION THIS
SESSION THAT THEY
BELIEVE ARE SESSION THAT THEY
BELIEVE ARE SESSION THAT THEY
BELIEVE ARE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. BELIEVE ARE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. UNCONSTITUTIONAL. THEY THEY INVOLVE THEY INVOLVE THE THEY INVOLVE THE
GOVERNOR'S THEY INVOLVE THE
GOVERNOR'S EXECUTIVE THEY INVOLVE THE
GOVERNOR'S EXECUTIVE
POWER, THEY INVOLVE THE
GOVERNOR'S EXECUTIVE
POWER, THE THEY INVOLVE THE
GOVERNOR'S EXECUTIVE
POWER, THE ATTORNEY GOVERNOR'S EXECUTIVE
POWER, THE ATTORNEY GOVERNOR'S EXECUTIVE
POWER, THE ATTORNEY
GENERALS GOVERNOR'S EXECUTIVE
POWER, THE ATTORNEY
GENERALS POWER, GOVERNOR'S EXECUTIVE
POWER, THE ATTORNEY
GENERALS POWER, AND POWER, THE ATTORNEY
GENERALS POWER, AND POWER, THE ATTORNEY
GENERALS POWER, AND
BALLOT POWER, THE ATTORNEY
GENERALS POWER, AND
BALLOT INITIATIVE POWER, THE ATTORNEY
GENERALS POWER, AND
BALLOT INITIATIVE RULES GENERALS POWER, AND
BALLOT INITIATIVE RULES GENERALS POWER, AND
BALLOT INITIATIVE RULES
CHANGES. BALLOT INITIATIVE RULES
CHANGES. BALLOT INITIATIVE RULES
CHANGES.
"SO BALLOT INITIATIVE RULES
CHANGES.
"SO MANY BALLOT INITIATIVE RULES
CHANGES.
"SO MANY OF BALLOT INITIATIVE RULES
CHANGES.
"SO MANY OF THESE CHANGES.
"SO MANY OF THESE CHANGES.
"SO MANY OF THESE
PEOPLE CHANGES.
"SO MANY OF THESE
PEOPLE COME CHANGES.
"SO MANY OF THESE
PEOPLE COME TO CHANGES.
"SO MANY OF THESE
PEOPLE COME TO THE "SO MANY OF THESE
PEOPLE COME TO THE "SO MANY OF THESE
PEOPLE COME TO THE
LEGISLATURE "SO MANY OF THESE
PEOPLE COME TO THE
LEGISLATURE AND "SO MANY OF THESE
PEOPLE COME TO THE
LEGISLATURE AND THEY PEOPLE COME TO THE
LEGISLATURE AND THEY PEOPLE COME TO THE
LEGISLATURE AND THEY
SAY, PEOPLE COME TO THE
LEGISLATURE AND THEY
SAY, WELL PEOPLE COME TO THE
LEGISLATURE AND THEY
SAY, WELL I PEOPLE COME TO THE
LEGISLATURE AND THEY
SAY, WELL I BELIEVE PEOPLE COME TO THE
LEGISLATURE AND THEY
SAY, WELL I BELIEVE IN LEGISLATURE AND THEY
SAY, WELL I BELIEVE IN LEGISLATURE AND THEY
SAY, WELL I BELIEVE IN
CONSTITUTIONAL SAY, WELL I BELIEVE IN
CONSTITUTIONAL SAY, WELL I BELIEVE IN
CONSTITUTIONAL
GOVERNMENT. SAY, WELL I BELIEVE IN
CONSTITUTIONAL
GOVERNMENT. BUT, CONSTITUTIONAL
GOVERNMENT. BUT, CONSTITUTIONAL
GOVERNMENT. BUT,
WHEN CONSTITUTIONAL
GOVERNMENT. BUT,
WHEN IT CONSTITUTIONAL
GOVERNMENT. BUT,
WHEN IT COMES CONSTITUTIONAL
GOVERNMENT. BUT,
WHEN IT COMES TO GOVERNMENT. BUT,
WHEN IT COMES TO GOVERNMENT. BUT,
WHEN IT COMES TO
UPHOLDING GOVERNMENT. BUT,
WHEN IT COMES TO
UPHOLDING THE WHEN IT COMES TO
UPHOLDING THE WHEN IT COMES TO
UPHOLDING THE
CONSTITUTION WHEN IT COMES TO
UPHOLDING THE
CONSTITUTION THEY WHEN IT COMES TO
UPHOLDING THE
CONSTITUTION THEY ARE UPHOLDING THE
CONSTITUTION THEY ARE UPHOLDING THE
CONSTITUTION THEY ARE
NOT UPHOLDING THE
CONSTITUTION THEY ARE
NOT VERY UPHOLDING THE
CONSTITUTION THEY ARE
NOT VERY FAITHFUL UPHOLDING THE
CONSTITUTION THEY ARE
NOT VERY FAITHFUL TO CONSTITUTION THEY ARE
NOT VERY FAITHFUL TO CONSTITUTION THEY ARE
NOT VERY FAITHFUL TO
WHAT CONSTITUTION THEY ARE
NOT VERY FAITHFUL TO
WHAT THEY CONSTITUTION THEY ARE
NOT VERY FAITHFUL TO
WHAT THEY PROFESS CONSTITUTION THEY ARE
NOT VERY FAITHFUL TO
WHAT THEY PROFESS THEY NOT VERY FAITHFUL TO
WHAT THEY PROFESS THEY NOT VERY FAITHFUL TO
WHAT THEY PROFESS THEY
BELIEVE." WHAT THEY PROFESS THEY
BELIEVE." WHAT THEY PROFESS THEY
BELIEVE."
"WE WHAT THEY PROFESS THEY
BELIEVE."
"WE WANT WHAT THEY PROFESS THEY
BELIEVE."
"WE WANT TO WHAT THEY PROFESS THEY
BELIEVE."
"WE WANT TO LET WHAT THEY PROFESS THEY
BELIEVE."
"WE WANT TO LET THE BELIEVE."
"WE WANT TO LET THE BELIEVE."
"WE WANT TO LET THE
PEOPLE BELIEVE."
"WE WANT TO LET THE
PEOPLE KNOW BELIEVE."
"WE WANT TO LET THE
PEOPLE KNOW WHY "WE WANT TO LET THE
PEOPLE KNOW WHY "WE WANT TO LET THE
PEOPLE KNOW WHY
VARIOUS "WE WANT TO LET THE
PEOPLE KNOW WHY
VARIOUS PROPOSALS "WE WANT TO LET THE
PEOPLE KNOW WHY
VARIOUS PROPOSALS ARE PEOPLE KNOW WHY
VARIOUS PROPOSALS ARE PEOPLE KNOW WHY
VARIOUS PROPOSALS ARE
VIOLATIVE PEOPLE KNOW WHY
VARIOUS PROPOSALS ARE
VIOLATIVE OF PEOPLE KNOW WHY
VARIOUS PROPOSALS ARE
VIOLATIVE OF THE VARIOUS PROPOSALS ARE
VIOLATIVE OF THE VIOLATIVE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL
PROVISIONS, CONSTITUTIONAL
PROVISIONS, SEPARATION PROVISIONS, SEPARATION OF OF POWERS OF POWERS AND OF POWERS AND CHECKS OF POWERS AND CHECKS
AND OF POWERS AND CHECKS
AND BALANCES, OF POWERS AND CHECKS
AND BALANCES, SO OF POWERS AND CHECKS
AND BALANCES, SO THAT OF POWERS AND CHECKS
AND BALANCES, SO THAT
THEY OF POWERS AND CHECKS
AND BALANCES, SO THAT
THEY CAN OF POWERS AND CHECKS
AND BALANCES, SO THAT
THEY CAN EVALUATE AND BALANCES, SO THAT
THEY CAN EVALUATE AND BALANCES, SO THAT
THEY CAN EVALUATE
WHAT AND BALANCES, SO THAT
THEY CAN EVALUATE
WHAT THEIR AND BALANCES, SO THAT
THEY CAN EVALUATE
WHAT THEIR LEGISLATORS THEY CAN EVALUATE
WHAT THEIR LEGISLATORS THEY CAN EVALUATE
WHAT THEIR LEGISLATORS
ARE THEY CAN EVALUATE
WHAT THEIR LEGISLATORS
ARE DOING THEY CAN EVALUATE
WHAT THEIR LEGISLATORS
ARE DOING AND THEY CAN EVALUATE
WHAT THEIR LEGISLATORS
ARE DOING AND MAYBE WHAT THEIR LEGISLATORS
ARE DOING AND MAYBE WHAT THEIR LEGISLATORS
ARE DOING AND MAYBE
GIVE WHAT THEIR LEGISLATORS
ARE DOING AND MAYBE
GIVE THEM WHAT THEIR LEGISLATORS
ARE DOING AND MAYBE
GIVE THEM TIME WHAT THEIR LEGISLATORS
ARE DOING AND MAYBE
GIVE THEM TIME TO WHAT THEIR LEGISLATORS
ARE DOING AND MAYBE
GIVE THEM TIME TO THINK ARE DOING AND MAYBE
GIVE THEM TIME TO THINK ARE DOING AND MAYBE
GIVE THEM TIME TO THINK
ABOUT ARE DOING AND MAYBE
GIVE THEM TIME TO THINK
ABOUT IT ARE DOING AND MAYBE
GIVE THEM TIME TO THINK
ABOUT IT IN ARE DOING AND MAYBE
GIVE THEM TIME TO THINK
ABOUT IT IN RETIREMENT." GIVE THEM TIME TO THINK
ABOUT IT IN RETIREMENT." GIVE THEM TIME TO THINK
ABOUT IT IN RETIREMENT."
JUSTICE GIVE THEM TIME TO THINK
ABOUT IT IN RETIREMENT."
JUSTICE JONES GIVE THEM TIME TO THINK
ABOUT IT IN RETIREMENT."
JUSTICE JONES POINTS ABOUT IT IN RETIREMENT."
JUSTICE JONES POINTS ABOUT IT IN RETIREMENT."
JUSTICE JONES POINTS
OUT ABOUT IT IN RETIREMENT."
JUSTICE JONES POINTS
OUT THAT ABOUT IT IN RETIREMENT."
JUSTICE JONES POINTS
OUT THAT THE JUSTICE JONES POINTS
OUT THAT THE JUSTICE JONES POINTS
OUT THAT THE
LEGISLATURE JUSTICE JONES POINTS
OUT THAT THE
LEGISLATURE HAS JUSTICE JONES POINTS
OUT THAT THE
LEGISLATURE HAS A JUSTICE JONES POINTS
OUT THAT THE
LEGISLATURE HAS A LONG OUT THAT THE
LEGISLATURE HAS A LONG OUT THAT THE
LEGISLATURE HAS A LONG
RECORD OUT THAT THE
LEGISLATURE HAS A LONG
RECORD OF OUT THAT THE
LEGISLATURE HAS A LONG
RECORD OF PASSING LEGISLATURE HAS A LONG
RECORD OF PASSING LEGISLATURE HAS A LONG
RECORD OF PASSING
LEGISLATION LEGISLATURE HAS A LONG
RECORD OF PASSING
LEGISLATION THAT LEGISLATURE HAS A LONG
RECORD OF PASSING
LEGISLATION THAT THE RECORD OF PASSING
LEGISLATION THAT THE RECORD OF PASSING
LEGISLATION THAT THE
ATTORNEY RECORD OF PASSING
LEGISLATION THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S LEGISLATION THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S LEGISLATION THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE LEGISLATION THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TOLD LEGISLATION THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TOLD THEM LEGISLATION THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TOLD THEM WAS ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TOLD THEM WAS ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TOLD THEM WAS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TOLD THEM WAS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HE OFFICE TOLD THEM WAS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HE OFFICE TOLD THEM WAS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HE
ADDS OFFICE TOLD THEM WAS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HE
ADDS THAT OFFICE TOLD THEM WAS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HE
ADDS THAT THIS OFFICE TOLD THEM WAS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HE
ADDS THAT THIS ISN'T OFFICE TOLD THEM WAS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HE
ADDS THAT THIS ISN'T A UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HE
ADDS THAT THIS ISN'T A UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HE
ADDS THAT THIS ISN'T A
POLITICAL UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HE
ADDS THAT THIS ISN'T A
POLITICAL PLAY UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HE
ADDS THAT THIS ISN'T A
POLITICAL PLAY AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HE
ADDS THAT THIS ISN'T A
POLITICAL PLAY AND THEY ADDS THAT THIS ISN'T A
POLITICAL PLAY AND THEY ADDS THAT THIS ISN'T A
POLITICAL PLAY AND THEY
ARE ADDS THAT THIS ISN'T A
POLITICAL PLAY AND THEY
ARE NOT ADDS THAT THIS ISN'T A
POLITICAL PLAY AND THEY
ARE NOT ON ADDS THAT THIS ISN'T A
POLITICAL PLAY AND THEY
ARE NOT ON ANYONE'S POLITICAL PLAY AND THEY
ARE NOT ON ANYONE'S POLITICAL PLAY AND THEY
ARE NOT ON ANYONE'S
SIDE, POLITICAL PLAY AND THEY
ARE NOT ON ANYONE'S
SIDE, THEY POLITICAL PLAY AND THEY
ARE NOT ON ANYONE'S
SIDE, THEY ARE POLITICAL PLAY AND THEY
ARE NOT ON ANYONE'S
SIDE, THEY ARE ON POLITICAL PLAY AND THEY
ARE NOT ON ANYONE'S
SIDE, THEY ARE ON THE ARE NOT ON ANYONE'S
SIDE, THEY ARE ON THE ARE NOT ON ANYONE'S
SIDE, THEY ARE ON THE
SIDE ARE NOT ON ANYONE'S
SIDE, THEY ARE ON THE
SIDE OF ARE NOT ON ANYONE'S
SIDE, THEY ARE ON THE
SIDE OF THE ARE NOT ON ANYONE'S
SIDE, THEY ARE ON THE
SIDE OF THE LAW. SIDE, THEY ARE ON THE
SIDE OF THE LAW. SIDE, THEY ARE ON THE
SIDE OF THE LAW.
"PEOPLE SIDE, THEY ARE ON THE
SIDE OF THE LAW.
"PEOPLE JUST SIDE, THEY ARE ON THE
SIDE OF THE LAW.
"PEOPLE JUST DON'T SIDE, THEY ARE ON THE
SIDE OF THE LAW.
"PEOPLE JUST DON'T LIKE SIDE OF THE LAW.
"PEOPLE JUST DON'T LIKE SIDE OF THE LAW.
"PEOPLE JUST DON'T LIKE
THE SIDE OF THE LAW.
"PEOPLE JUST DON'T LIKE
THE FACT SIDE OF THE LAW.
"PEOPLE JUST DON'T LIKE
THE FACT THAT SIDE OF THE LAW.
"PEOPLE JUST DON'T LIKE
THE FACT THAT THE "PEOPLE JUST DON'T LIKE
THE FACT THAT THE "PEOPLE JUST DON'T LIKE
THE FACT THAT THE
ATTORNEY "PEOPLE JUST DON'T LIKE
THE FACT THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL "PEOPLE JUST DON'T LIKE
THE FACT THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS THE FACT THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS THE FACT THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS
TOLD THE FACT THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS
TOLD THEM THE FACT THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS
TOLD THEM THEY THE FACT THAT THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS
TOLD THEM THEY CAN'T ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS
TOLD THEM THEY CAN'T ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS
TOLD THEM THEY CAN'T
DO ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS
TOLD THEM THEY CAN'T
DO SOMETHING ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS
TOLD THEM THEY CAN'T
DO SOMETHING BECAUSE TOLD THEM THEY CAN'T
DO SOMETHING BECAUSE TOLD THEM THEY CAN'T
DO SOMETHING BECAUSE
IT'S TOLD THEM THEY CAN'T
DO SOMETHING BECAUSE
IT'S A TOLD THEM THEY CAN'T
DO SOMETHING BECAUSE
IT'S A VIOLATION TOLD THEM THEY CAN'T
DO SOMETHING BECAUSE
IT'S A VIOLATION OF TOLD THEM THEY CAN'T
DO SOMETHING BECAUSE
IT'S A VIOLATION OF THE DO SOMETHING BECAUSE
IT'S A VIOLATION OF THE DO SOMETHING BECAUSE
IT'S A VIOLATION OF THE
CONSTITUTION. DO SOMETHING BECAUSE
IT'S A VIOLATION OF THE
CONSTITUTION. THEY IT'S A VIOLATION OF THE
CONSTITUTION. THEY IT'S A VIOLATION OF THE
CONSTITUTION. THEY
DON'T IT'S A VIOLATION OF THE
CONSTITUTION. THEY
DON'T WANT IT'S A VIOLATION OF THE
CONSTITUTION. THEY
DON'T WANT TO IT'S A VIOLATION OF THE
CONSTITUTION. THEY
DON'T WANT TO HEAR CONSTITUTION. THEY
DON'T WANT TO HEAR CONSTITUTION. THEY
DON'T WANT TO HEAR
THAT, CONSTITUTION. THEY
DON'T WANT TO HEAR
THAT, THEY CONSTITUTION. THEY
DON'T WANT TO HEAR
THAT, THEY WANT CONSTITUTION. THEY
DON'T WANT TO HEAR
THAT, THEY WANT TO DON'T WANT TO HEAR
THAT, THEY WANT TO DON'T WANT TO HEAR
THAT, THEY WANT TO
HEAR DON'T WANT TO HEAR
THAT, THEY WANT TO
HEAR SOME DON'T WANT TO HEAR
THAT, THEY WANT TO
HEAR SOME CLOWN DON'T WANT TO HEAR
THAT, THEY WANT TO
HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO THAT, THEY WANT TO
HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO THAT, THEY WANT TO
HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO
WILL THAT, THEY WANT TO
HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO
WILL TELL THAT, THEY WANT TO
HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO
WILL TELL THEM, THAT, THEY WANT TO
HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO
WILL TELL THEM, OH THAT, THEY WANT TO
HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO
WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO
WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO
WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA
YOU HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO
WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA
YOU CAN HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO
WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA
YOU CAN DO HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO
WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA
YOU CAN DO THAT, HEAR SOME CLOWN WHO
WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA
YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA
YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA
YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT
WHEN WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA
YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT
WHEN THEY WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA
YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT
WHEN THEY GET WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA
YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT
WHEN THEY GET TAKEN WILL TELL THEM, OH YEA
YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT
WHEN THEY GET TAKEN TO YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT
WHEN THEY GET TAKEN TO YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT
WHEN THEY GET TAKEN TO
COURT YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT
WHEN THEY GET TAKEN TO
COURT THEY YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT
WHEN THEY GET TAKEN TO
COURT THEY JUST YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT
WHEN THEY GET TAKEN TO
COURT THEY JUST END YOU CAN DO THAT, BUT
WHEN THEY GET TAKEN TO
COURT THEY JUST END UP WHEN THEY GET TAKEN TO
COURT THEY JUST END UP WHEN THEY GET TAKEN TO
COURT THEY JUST END UP
WITH WHEN THEY GET TAKEN TO
COURT THEY JUST END UP
WITH EGG WHEN THEY GET TAKEN TO
COURT THEY JUST END UP
WITH EGG ON WHEN THEY GET TAKEN TO
COURT THEY JUST END UP
WITH EGG ON THEIR COURT THEY JUST END UP
WITH EGG ON THEIR COURT THEY JUST END UP
WITH EGG ON THEIR
FACE." WITH EGG ON THEIR
FACE." WITH EGG ON THEIR
FACE."
WHEN WITH EGG ON THEIR
FACE."
WHEN THAT WITH EGG ON THEIR
FACE."
WHEN THAT HAPPENS, FACE."
WHEN THAT HAPPENS, FACE."
WHEN THAT HAPPENS,
AGAIN, FACE."
WHEN THAT HAPPENS,
AGAIN, JONES FACE."
WHEN THAT HAPPENS,
AGAIN, JONES SAYS FACE."
WHEN THAT HAPPENS,
AGAIN, JONES SAYS IT WHEN THAT HAPPENS,
AGAIN, JONES SAYS IT WHEN THAT HAPPENS,
AGAIN, JONES SAYS IT
COSTS WHEN THAT HAPPENS,
AGAIN, JONES SAYS IT
COSTS IDAHO WHEN THAT HAPPENS,
AGAIN, JONES SAYS IT
COSTS IDAHO TAXPAYERS AGAIN, JONES SAYS IT
COSTS IDAHO TAXPAYERS AGAIN, JONES SAYS IT
COSTS IDAHO TAXPAYERS
LOTS AGAIN, JONES SAYS IT
COSTS IDAHO TAXPAYERS
LOTS OF AGAIN, JONES SAYS IT
COSTS IDAHO TAXPAYERS
LOTS OF MONEY. AGAIN, JONES SAYS IT
COSTS IDAHO TAXPAYERS
LOTS OF MONEY. THE COSTS IDAHO TAXPAYERS
LOTS OF MONEY. THE COSTS IDAHO TAXPAYERS
LOTS OF MONEY. THE
COMMITTEE COSTS IDAHO TAXPAYERS
LOTS OF MONEY. THE
COMMITTEE TO COSTS IDAHO TAXPAYERS
LOTS OF MONEY. THE
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT LOTS OF MONEY. THE
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT LOTS OF MONEY. THE
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND LOTS OF MONEY. THE
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE LOTS OF MONEY. THE
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE THE LOTS OF MONEY. THE
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION IS COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION IS NOT COMMITTEE TO PROTECT
AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION IS NOT A AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION IS NOT A AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION IS NOT A
SYMBOLIC AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION IS NOT A
SYMBOLIC GESTURE AND PRESERVE THE IDAHO
CONSTITUTION IS NOT A
SYMBOLIC GESTURE JONES CONSTITUTION IS NOT A
SYMBOLIC GESTURE JONES CONSTITUTION IS NOT A
SYMBOLIC GESTURE JONES
SAYS. CONSTITUTION IS NOT A
SYMBOLIC GESTURE JONES
SAYS. HE CONSTITUTION IS NOT A
SYMBOLIC GESTURE JONES
SAYS. HE SAYS CONSTITUTION IS NOT A
SYMBOLIC GESTURE JONES
SAYS. HE SAYS THEY CONSTITUTION IS NOT A
SYMBOLIC GESTURE JONES
SAYS. HE SAYS THEY HAVE SYMBOLIC GESTURE JONES
SAYS. HE SAYS THEY HAVE SYMBOLIC GESTURE JONES
SAYS. HE SAYS THEY HAVE
A SYMBOLIC GESTURE JONES
SAYS. HE SAYS THEY HAVE
A GROWING SYMBOLIC GESTURE JONES
SAYS. HE SAYS THEY HAVE
A GROWING GROUP SYMBOLIC GESTURE JONES
SAYS. HE SAYS THEY HAVE
A GROWING GROUP OF SAYS. HE SAYS THEY HAVE
A GROWING GROUP OF SAYS. HE SAYS THEY HAVE
A GROWING GROUP OF
IDAHO SAYS. HE SAYS THEY HAVE
A GROWING GROUP OF
IDAHO LEGAL SAYS. HE SAYS THEY HAVE
A GROWING GROUP OF
IDAHO LEGAL EXPERTS A GROWING GROUP OF
IDAHO LEGAL EXPERTS A GROWING GROUP OF
IDAHO LEGAL EXPERTS
JOINING A GROWING GROUP OF
IDAHO LEGAL EXPERTS
JOINING THEIR A GROWING GROUP OF
IDAHO LEGAL EXPERTS
JOINING THEIR CAUSE IDAHO LEGAL EXPERTS
JOINING THEIR CAUSE JOINING THEIR CAUSE READY READY TO READY TO TAKE READY TO TAKE ACTION READY TO TAKE ACTION IF READY TO TAKE ACTION IF
LAWMAKERS READY TO TAKE ACTION IF
LAWMAKERS CONTINUE READY TO TAKE ACTION IF
LAWMAKERS CONTINUE
TO READY TO TAKE ACTION IF
LAWMAKERS CONTINUE
TO PASS READY TO TAKE ACTION IF
LAWMAKERS CONTINUE
TO PASS LEGISLATION LAWMAKERS CONTINUE
TO PASS LEGISLATION LAWMAKERS CONTINUE
TO PASS LEGISLATION
THAT LAWMAKERS CONTINUE
TO PASS LEGISLATION
THAT THEY LAWMAKERS CONTINUE
TO PASS LEGISLATION
THAT THEY BELIEVE LAWMAKERS CONTINUE
TO PASS LEGISLATION
THAT THEY BELIEVE IS TO PASS LEGISLATION
THAT THEY BELIEVE IS TO PASS LEGISLATION
THAT THEY BELIEVE IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. THAT THEY BELIEVE IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. THAT THEY BELIEVE IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
"WE THAT THEY BELIEVE IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
"WE INTEND THAT THEY BELIEVE IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
"WE INTEND TO THAT THEY BELIEVE IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
"WE INTEND TO GO THAT THEY BELIEVE IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
"WE INTEND TO GO AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
"WE INTEND TO GO AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
"WE INTEND TO GO AS
FAR UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
"WE INTEND TO GO AS
FAR AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
"WE INTEND TO GO AS
FAR AS WE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
"WE INTEND TO GO AS
FAR AS WE NEED UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
"WE INTEND TO GO AS
FAR AS WE NEED TO UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
"WE INTEND TO GO AS
FAR AS WE NEED TO BE "WE INTEND TO GO AS
FAR AS WE NEED TO BE "WE INTEND TO GO AS
FAR AS WE NEED TO BE
GOING "WE INTEND TO GO AS
FAR AS WE NEED TO BE
GOING IN "WE INTEND TO GO AS
FAR AS WE NEED TO BE
GOING IN ORDER "WE INTEND TO GO AS
FAR AS WE NEED TO BE
GOING IN ORDER TO "WE INTEND TO GO AS
FAR AS WE NEED TO BE
GOING IN ORDER TO GET FAR AS WE NEED TO BE
GOING IN ORDER TO GET FAR AS WE NEED TO BE
GOING IN ORDER TO GET
UNCONSTITUTIONAL GOING IN ORDER TO GET
UNCONSTITUTIONAL GOING IN ORDER TO GET
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
LEGISLATION GOING IN ORDER TO GET
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
LEGISLATION OF GOING IN ORDER TO GET
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
LEGISLATION OF THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
LEGISLATION OF THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
LEGISLATION OF THE
BOOKS." LEGISLATION OF THE
BOOKS." BOOKS." UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNCONSTITUTIONAL
LEGISLATION UNCONSTITUTIONAL
LEGISLATION OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL
LEGISLATION OF THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
LEGISLATION OF THE
BOOKS." LEGISLATION OF THE
BOOKS." BOOKS." LEGAL LEGAL FIGHTS LEGAL FIGHTS ARE LEGAL FIGHTS ARE VERY LEGAL FIGHTS ARE VERY
EXPENSIVE, LEGAL FIGHTS ARE VERY
EXPENSIVE, WHO LEGAL FIGHTS ARE VERY
EXPENSIVE, WHO IS LEGAL FIGHTS ARE VERY
EXPENSIVE, WHO IS GOING LEGAL FIGHTS ARE VERY
EXPENSIVE, WHO IS GOING
TO LEGAL FIGHTS ARE VERY
EXPENSIVE, WHO IS GOING
TO PAY LEGAL FIGHTS ARE VERY
EXPENSIVE, WHO IS GOING
TO PAY THE LEGAL FIGHTS ARE VERY
EXPENSIVE, WHO IS GOING
TO PAY THE COMMITTEE EXPENSIVE, WHO IS GOING
TO PAY THE COMMITTEE EXPENSIVE, WHO IS GOING
TO PAY THE COMMITTEE
TO EXPENSIVE, WHO IS GOING
TO PAY THE COMMITTEE
TO WORK EXPENSIVE, WHO IS GOING
TO PAY THE COMMITTEE
TO WORK AND EXPENSIVE, WHO IS GOING
TO PAY THE COMMITTEE
TO WORK AND SPEND TO PAY THE COMMITTEE
TO WORK AND SPEND TO PAY THE COMMITTEE
TO WORK AND SPEND
THEIR TO PAY THE COMMITTEE
TO WORK AND SPEND
THEIR TIME TO PAY THE COMMITTEE
TO WORK AND SPEND
THEIR TIME WORKING TO PAY THE COMMITTEE
TO WORK AND SPEND
THEIR TIME WORKING ON TO WORK AND SPEND
THEIR TIME WORKING ON TO WORK AND SPEND
THEIR TIME WORKING ON
CASES TO WORK AND SPEND
THEIR TIME WORKING ON
CASES IF TO WORK AND SPEND
THEIR TIME WORKING ON
CASES IF THEY TO WORK AND SPEND
THEIR TIME WORKING ON
CASES IF THEY POP TO WORK AND SPEND
THEIR TIME WORKING ON
CASES IF THEY POP UP? THEIR TIME WORKING ON
CASES IF THEY POP UP? CASES IF THEY POP UP?
