eSign Form for Legal Later

The later sign feature in airSlate SignNow allows users to schedule document signing for a future date and time. This flexibility ensures that all parties can prepare and review documents before signing, making the process more efficient and organized.

airSlate SignNow offers competitive pricing options, which include access to the later sign feature. You can choose from various plans tailored to meet your business needs, ensuring you get the most cost-effective solution for document signing and management.

Yes, airSlate SignNow supports integrations with a wide range of applications, allowing you to use the later sign feature seamlessly within your existing workflow. Integrations include CRM systems, cloud storage services, and productivity tools to enhance efficiency.

Using the later sign option in airSlate SignNow provides benefits such as improved time management and reduced pressure on signers. It ensures all parties have sufficient time to review documents, which can lead to fewer errors and more streamlined approvals.

Absolutely! The later sign feature in airSlate SignNow adheres to industry-leading security protocols, ensuring that your documents are safe during the signing process. This commitment to security helps protect sensitive data while enabling convenient digital transactions.

Implementing the later sign feature can signNowly enhance your business processes by allowing for scheduled signing times. This means less back-and-forth communication and quicker turnaround times for document approvals, ultimately saving you time and resources.

Yes, airSlate SignNow provides tracking capabilities for documents set for later sign. You'll receive notifications and can easily monitor the status of the signing process, ensuring that you stay informed throughout the entire workflow.

I think there are two ways to answer this question — what’s likely, and what’s possible.I think what is likely, is that Don Jr. was not set up for anything except failure — meaning that there was no malicious plan to screw him over, he just did it to himself by lacking competence in what he was trying to do.But that’s not the only possibility.There is an argument that can be made that Jared Kushner set him up. Bear with me for a minute while I present it.It basically goes like this — Jared Kushner and Don Jr. were both present at the meeting with the Russians, thus having first-hand knowledge of its content and participants.[1] They also both knew about the intent of the meeting (collusion with the Russian government to support Trump and undermine Clinton) because it’s explicitly stated in the emails they both received. [2]Kushner failed to disclose that meeting — or literally any other foreign contact — on his SF-86 form (this is the form that federal government employees submit for their security clearances). [3] He later amended his SF-86 form two times to disclose that meeting and over 100 foreign contacts.[4]His explanation for why he initially omitted these meetings — from a document that includes a sworn statement under penalty of felony criminal charges that the information within is complete to the best of your knowledge — is that a member of his staff “prematurely” submitted the form in error. [5] As I can personally verify, having gone through the SF-86 process for my own clearance, that’s not really a possibility unless you accidentally clicked the wrong button 28 times in a row, accidentally e-signed it, and accidentally gave your legal medical release as well. (It’s a VERY long form, with a lot of confirmations).[6] So as anyone whose ever gotten a security clearance can tell you, that explanation is bogus. Now, if you forget to disclose a meeting or two on that form, or you got a date or name wrong — not unusual for very experienced applicants, or people in senior positions in certain fields — you can amend the form to include the names you missed. It’s unusual to do that more than once, or as widely as Kushner did.Now, here’s where it gets really interesting. Look at the timeline —June 9, 2016, is the meeting with the Russians.January 18, 2017: Kushner files his initial SF-86 which fails to disclose the foreign contacts. Kushner allegedly notifies the FBI “the next day” that he would fill in the missing information later. [7]April 6, 2017: New York Times reports that Kushner failed to disclose numerous meetings, including with Russian Amb. Sergei Kisylak. [8]May 11, 2017: Kushner files a first revision to his SF-86, and receives what is believed to be standard questioning from the FBI some time in mid-May.[9]“Third week of June, 2017” (exact date unknown) Marc Kasowitz, Trump’s personal attorney; and Alan Garten, chief legal officer for the Trump Organization, are informed of the existence of the emails, by Kushner’s attorneys (who had “discovered” the emails). [10]June 21, 2017: Kushner files his second revision to the SF-86. This discloses the Russian meeting to the FBI. [11]June 23, 2017: The FBI questions Kushner again over the second revision.[12] This is NOT standard.July 9–11: NY Times breaks the story of the Russian meeting, and the emails. After being contacted by the Times, Don Jr. chooses to release the emails via his twitter, before the Times can publish their story. During this time Don Jr.’s characterization of the meeting is first that it was about adoptions; then that it was about opposition research but they didn’t get any so it ended up being about adoptions; and finally admitting (with the release of the emails) that it was about the damaging information provided from the Russians, as explained clearly in the emails. At least one of these statements was drafted with the consultation of the White House legal team, and was “signed off” on by Trump himself. [13]July 12: Trump says “I only heard of it two or three days ago” (referring to the meeting). [14] In order for that to be true, it would require that two of Trump’s children, his campaign manager, his personal lawyer, the lawyers for his children, and the chief legal officer intentionally kept that information from Trump for at least two to three weeks (or in the case of Kushner/Jr./Manafort, for over a year.)So it begs the question — since Kushner knew of the meetings, had already disclosed them to the FBI (quietly, through the second SF-86 amendment, without trying to draw attention to it), and knew how damaging the information would be to their credibility on the Russia collusion question— why was Don Jr. allowed to make statements that Kushner and others knew weeks in advance were false?The answer is of course up to interpretation, but “what is possible” is that Kushner and Trump, knowing that the contents of the Russian meeting email would be going public sooner rather than later (since the media already had learned of the meeting), are attempting to set up Don Jr. to take the fall. By directing the media’s attention to Jr., who can be laughed off as an incompetent idiot who didn’t know what he was doing, Kushner buys more time for himself, taking some of the heat away from himself and his father-in-law, during the critical days ahead of the Trumpcare healthcare vote. Incidentally, Don Jr. makes for a great fall-guy, because even though he unofficially “advises” his father, he’s technically still an uncleared, private civilian who is subject to far fewer rules on disclosure, transparency, and honesty as Kushner is. And we know that the Trump organization places a high premium on protecting Kushner, who (along with Ivanka) is probably the single most influential person on Trump inside or outside the entire administration. [15]It’s also been speculated that the source of the leaks may not actually be Kushner, but could be Steve Bannon — who dislikes Kushner intensely and has been in a political power struggle with him since the transition.[16] If that’s true, then Jr. isn’t so much being “set up” so much as he’s “collateral damage.”Again, I think the most likely explanation is that Don Jr. is simply an incompetent idiot. But we know Jared Kushner, while he may not be “competent” in the traditional Washington sense, is not an idiot. He’s the one to keep an eye on here, not Don Jr.Footnotes[1] Trump Tower Russia meeting: At least eight people in the room[2] Kushner Omitted Meeting With Russians on Security Clearance Forms[3] Details revealed about Jared Kushner's security clearance forms[4] Details revealed about Jared Kushner's security clearance forms[5] Kushner’s lawyers say he mistakenly left meetings with the Russians off his security forms twice[6] https://nbib.opm.gov/record-prov...[7] People aren't buying Kushner's lawyers' explanation for security clearance form omissions[8] Kushner Omitted Meeting With Russians on Security Clearance Forms[9] Sources: Trump lawyers knew of Russia emails three weeks ago[10] Sources: Trump lawyers knew of Russia emails three weeks ago[11] Sources: Trump lawyers knew of Russia emails three weeks ago[12] Sources: Trump lawyers knew of Russia emails three weeks ago[13] Rancor at White House as Russia Story Refuses to Let the Page Turn[14] Trump says he learned ‘couple of days ago’ of son’s meeting with Russian lawyer[15] Did Jared leak the Donald Trump Jr meeting emails?[16] The Inside Story of the Kushner-Bannon Civil War

Many insurance companies use signNow for their e-signature needs. It has the best online link/forms solution in the esign industry so that you can integrate new enrollments directly from your website. There's also a flexible API for integrations as well. If you want to send documents in bulk for esigning, like customer renewals, you can do that too. There's also an in-person signing feature for clients right in your office. signNow just integrated with Salesforce and has payment processing capabilities as well. signNow is easy to use, cost-effective and has great customer service if you have any issues. You can sign up for signNow's free trial on their website and request to see a webinar to check out how it will work for your requirements.

I now accept Suggested Edits, as they come in. Include the price of the product/service.Pre Launch:Javelin. Start and grow your product faster. javelin.com/?ref=p5eybNFKResearch:Clipular http://www.clipular.com (free)Evernote http://www.evernote.com. Free, and $45 per year.Launching Soon Page:LaunchRock http://www.launchrock.comLaunchSoon http://launchsoon.comLanding PagesSelf Hosted:ThemeForest http://www.themeforest.net $8+Hosted:UnBounce (landing pages) http://www.unbounce.com $50/moKickOffLabs: http://www.kickofflabs.com/ $15/monthOptimizely: https://www.optimizely.com/ $17/monthTurnkey...

The murder of the young woman is a horrible crime and if indeed the young man is guilty, he should face the consequences.As for the US’s current immigration policy, it of course needs to be overhauled. It is byzantine, unpredictable, demeaning in the best of times. The episode of separating children from asylum seekers is unconscionable. To best of my recollection, all the 9/11 hijackers were here legally, but we lock up El Salvadoran toddlers. Does that make you feel safer?And yes there is this guy, who not only got in legally, but was eventually granted citizenship:Nazi labor camp guard living in New York deported to GermanyOkay, so they did get around to stripping his citizenship.The first time I remember my mother, an immigrant, swear, was when I was in high school. They has just—whaddya know—found some other old Nazi.“How did he get here?” my mother asked. “You know what I had to do to get into this country? The t.b. tests and ‘Are you a Communist?’”[here I might add that my mother was all of 15 where she came. Her parents were deceased.] “How did this Nazi get into the country? He knew somebody! GODDAMN GOVERNMENT!”Yes. The first time I can remember my mother swearing was in English and it was at the immigration services.So does this incident make me think less of immigration law? Not really. It was already pretty nonsensical.

There is a large group that don’t want the working man to get ahead. We cannot trust anything this group tells us because they are the ultimate manipulators who are neither seeking the truth or attempting to find solutions. What they are doing is attempting to hold the working class down.I know I sound paranoid but allow me to support what I just said because I’m not paranoid. Instead I am the Republicans’ worst nightmare. I am an intelligent, well-informed, well-read, blue-collar worker who holds a graduate degree. I am not easily fooled by these corrupt, smooth talking conmen. Butter may not melt in their collective mouth but I see right through their rhetoric, excuses, and smoke screens.What’s more Warren Buffet agrees with me.The Republican ultimate goal is to create a nations of serfs who willingly, albeit reluctantly, go about their work just as the slaves did in the South before the Civil War.This may seem bizarre but it is clear to me that the Republican leadership is attempting to recreate the plantation system giving the South its ultimate victory.The Republicans do not want to “solve” problems, they are the problem. Their goal is to create a nation of serfs tasked with creating their wealth. I base this opinion on their actions, not what they say.Their anti-union activities are a reflection of their war on the working class. They are patient and methodical as they chip away at anything that gives the workingman political power and control over their destiny. Republican want to own the country’s labor lock, stock, and barrel and as owners of the capitol they are succeeding.Republicans sincerely believe that when workers are able to join together to bargain collectively and seize some measure of power in the workplace, it’s an inherently bad thing. But even more importantly, they know that since unions are one of the Democratic Party’s key sources of funding and organizing, if they can be destroyed then it means Democrats will be weaker in every election. https://www.washingtonpost.com/b...Other targets are the safety net, universal health care, Medicare, education, a livable wage, and unemployment.The Republicans imply Social Security is paid for by our taxes so cutting benefits will save money. That is not the case. It is an insurance program paid for by our dividends. It has been raided many times, the latest by Bush to pay for his wars.Slashing Social Security to pay for the tax cut is disingenuous, it is a lie. Social Security benefits would be higher than they are if Congress had played fair all these years instead of “borrowing” from the fund.Social Security, in more ways than one the mother of all U.S. entitlement programs, has been the dragon that conservatives have succeeded in slashing, but never slaying, over its 80-year history. Their opposition has morphed from outright ideological grounds as the program was being debated during the New Deal era to a campaign masked in careful rhetoric once Social Security became virtually untouchable as a political animal. The 80-Year Conservative War On Social Security Is Back For MoreThe same is true for Medicare, another government sponsored insurance program.Minimum wage is opposed with sensible sounding rhetoric such as it will cost jobs and damage the economy but the fact is these are more lies. If this were the case minimum wage would still be the 25 cents an hour that is was in 1938 when FDR signed the law into existence.As a result of Milton Friedman’s theories put forward in the 70’s corporations began to treat wages as an expense instead of the social obligation they once did so began attempting kill unions and reduce wages as much as possible. Unions set the wage level in the country but Friedman saw them as the enemy taking work away from other workers. This is short sighted and damaging to the economy but it is their goal to pay their workers as little as humanly possible. It’s like parents seeing their children as an expense to reduce instead of an obligation to enhance. Government, in Friedman’s model, became the enemy of an unfettered marketplace. Friedman’s lopsided views led us willy-nilly into the recent market crash. What Friedman does not understand is not everything is about money. Friedman’s amoral outlook on business turned out to be a disaster for the working men and women of this country. Friedman’s goal is a healthy business community, not a healthy society. In 1789 France the wealthy elite lost their heads to the impoverished many. Will that have to happen here?If they are not going to step up to the plate and do the right thing then we need a mandated minimum wage.. . . of the market, he [Friedman] was a forceful critic of government. Yet history shows that in every successful country, the government had played an important role. Yes, governments sometimes fail, but unfettered markets are a certain prescription for failure. Friedman and GalbraithThis link will take you to a conservative rationalization for opposing a minimum wage: Why Do Conservatives Oppose Higher Minimum Wages?Ronald Reagan on the minimum wage: “The minimum wage,” Ronald Reagan argued in 1980, causes “more misery and unemployment than anything since the Great Depression.”This is nonsense but is the right-wing drumbeat. Far too many listen. Conservative Myths on Minimum Wage Have Dangerous ImplicationsIn the South slaves were not educated. An educated slave is a dangerous slave. So it is the Republicans have targeted education. Education is critical to the future of our country but you wouldn’t know based on how much money we allocate to it. After all an educated, thinking populace is a dangerous populace. So of course the right fears education: The right’s fear of education: What I learned as a (former) conservative military manOne way the Republicans can continue talking like they want better education for our children while at the same time crippling public education is to divert money from the school budget into Charter schools. Begun as an attempt to find ways to better educate students in places where public schools have a long history of inadequacy, these independently run schools were seen as the great hope for the future. The reality has been quite a different story. The Republican War on EducationTheir attempts to destroy any semblance of a safety net is based on dishonest, self-serving thinking and rhetoric. They oppose a safety net not because they think it won’t work but because it will. All other developed nations have a wide range of social programs to protect their citizens from want and misfortune. Their programs create a healthier and happier populace. What would conservatives have us do? They would have us depend on charity and their table scraps. The Conservative Myth of a Social Safety Net Built on CharityOf course unemployment and health care must be opposed as bad for worker initiative and damaging to the economy even though there are examples around the globe that these programs work with Canada being the nearest example.Lopsided tax laws are helping enrich the wealthy without providing benefit to those who need relief. Consequently we are going deeper in debt. Our growing national debt is another Reagan legacy. But our taxes aren’t going to pay down this drag on our economy. Our taxes instead go into the pockets of the wealthy. Unfair taxation has sparked revolutions.10 Ways the Tax System is Unfair to Middle-Class Americans | U.S. Senator Ron Wyden of OregonIt would seem to me many of the privileged hold the common working man in contempt. Not all, Warren Buffet and Bill Gates are examples of the more enlightened, but most seem to hate and fear the common man. The out of control Wall Street that nearly destroyed the world’s economy in 2008 is an example of what unbridled greed coupled with this scorn creates. The great unwashed may labor for them but don’t expect them to shake our grimy hands.It is the height of irony to me that so many working people have been voting for their enemies, the Republicans, who appeal to the most base impulses and prejudices of people. The Republicans have successfully copied Hitler’s strategy, The Big Lie, to discredit Hillary and push their bankrupt policies on those who will be most harmed by their efforts. Say the Clinton’s are crooks often enough and we begin to believe it. Tell us Obama nearly destroyed the country often enough and people will begin to repeat is as a known fact.Warren Buffett has some interesting observations about class warfare. He is one of the few wealthy Americans that is willing to say what many are thinking. Back in 2006, Buffett was quoted as saying “There’s class warfare, all right,” Mr. Buffett said, “but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.” In Class Warfare, Guess Which Class Is WinningI’m no fan of much liberal thinking because it is often ungrounded and ideological. But to me it is safer than the destructive impulses so present in the modern right wing where the wealthy have found their safe harbor from which to launch their self-serving propaganda and legislative torpedoes. They fund their dangerous legislation and action groups that have only the interests of the wealthy at heart. Who protects the interests of the common working man who actually creates the wealth of the country? Seemingly no one. Bernie Sanders is the voice in the wilderness and shuffled aside as irrelevant.I repeat, the ultimate irony is it is the working class that will provide most of the serfs for the new plantation class and yet they are the biggest source of support for their wannabe masters. The Southern slaves knew who their enemy was. The modern working class do not as they eagerly strap on their chains while chanting “Lock her up. Lock her up.”Milton Friedman, once described as "the most influential economist of the second half of the 20th century...possibly of all of it" once said “Any business executives who pursued a goal other than making money were, he said, ‘unwitting pup­pets of the intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free society these past decades.’ They were guilty of ‘analytical looseness and lack of rigor.’ They had even turned themselves into ‘unelected government officials’ who were illegally taxing employers and customers.”Thus it was not only did Friedman free corporate America of any sense of responsibility they once felt towards their employees but he set the tone for an unrestrained Wall Street to lead us into the Great Recession that, but for the efforts of Obama, very nearly turned into an economic disaster that would have rivaled the Great Recession of the thirties. Who saved us from a depression that could have spread across the globe? Obama did.Obama stepped up and did what needed to be. Against his every instinct, Obama bailed out Wall Street and saved it from its own greed and amoral blind pursuit for wealth. Wall Street got a free pass; the rest of the country did not. What did Wall Street do with all this free money? They handed out huge bonuses to their executives.Friedman, the economic lion who told us a free economy is a healthy one, did in time admit he was mistaken. As quoted in The Guardian: “Friedman has changed his mind: he admits he was wrong. Having had all that baleful influence on economic policy everywhere from the United Kingdom to Chile, Friedman has recanted.” https://www.theguardian.com/busi...Forbes challenges Friedman’s dangerous thinking: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ste...The Truth about Milton FriedmanWilliam Keegan: So now Friedman says he was wrong.Frontline Documentary about the 2008 crash that Friedman’s theories wrought.A few years old but still relevantLengthy but has interesting statistics.

Algorithm for starting a Private Limited Company: Engineer's View Personally I believe, If someone is starting a company with long term perspective or to bring some change through their unique Product/Services, one must go for Private limited firm. Prime reason for this is easy to raise funds from Angels/VC in case you go for investment. Step 1. Registration of Company 1. Name Selection: Check whether your desired company name is available or not at MCA website [ http://www.mca.gov.in/ ]. Name must be unique & must resemble with business you intend to do (highlighted one). EX: Arihant Labs Retail Services Pvt. Ltd 2. Registration of Name at ROC: Name approval usually takes maximum of 14 days. This is done online through MCA website. Moreover, you need to apply with at least 4 names for approval with a writeup about significance of names with main business of the company. 3. 1. Documents Required: 2. 1. Options for names for the proposed Company (on the basis of preference) 2. Amount of Share Capital; proposed shareholding ratio 3. A paragraph on the proposed major line of business of the company (main objects) 4. City of Registered Office. 5. Copy of ownership deed/sale deed(if property is owned) 6. Copy of rent agreement with NOC (if property is rented) 7. Copy of latest electricity bill/telephone bill/mobile bill for both directors 8. Copy of latest electric bill/telephone bill for the registered office proof. 4. Obtaining DIN & DSC: 5. 1. Documents Required 2. 1. PAN Card copies for directors and shareholders. 2. Voter ID/Passport/Driving License for directors and shareholders. 3. Occupation of the Directors for directors and shareholders. 4. E-Mail IDs of all directors and shareholders. 5. Phone Numbers for all directors and shareholders. 6. Photos for directors and shareholders 6. Company Incorporation: After above mentioned formalities have been completed, we need to file following forms/docs in Rs 100 stamp paper: 7. 1. Affidavits for non- acceptance 2. INC 9, INC 10 3. DIR 2 4. NOC : This is required to be filed by the owner of the property on which your company will be situated. 5. Subscriber Sheets of MOA & AOA 6. Documents required for filling MOA & AOA 7. 1. Must be filled on OWN handwriting 2. Passport size photos 3. Sheets needs to be witnessed by CA/CS/Advocate Step 2. Obtaining PAN/TAN: After company gets incorporated, you may apply for PAN/TAN. Step 3. Trade Licence in case you are selling PRODUCTS: This is required in some places for carrying out sales. You can obtain this from local Municipality. Step 4. VAT/CST registration for selling Products: For selling intra-state, you need VAT registration & for selling inter-state, you need to register for CST. 1. Documents Required: 2. 1. Trade Licence 2. Company Incorporation Certificate 3. PAN card of company as well as of all the directors 4. Proof of residence of Directors 5. Proof of occupancy of place of business (Rent agreement/ ownership deed, Rent Bills etc) 6. MOA & AOA of company 7. Current Account in the name of company in any national bank Step 5. Service tax registration for Service Industry: In India, you need to pay service tax of 14.5% on every services you have charged customer for. 1. Documents Required: 2. 1. Company Incorporation Certificate 2. PAN card of company as well as of all the directors 3. Proof of residence of Directors 4. Proof of occupancy of place of business (Rent agreement/ ownership deed, Rent Bills etc) 5. MOA & AOA of company 6. Current Account in the name of company in any national bank That's All folks! Your STARTUP is up to Conquer the World. UPVOTE & SHARE your views/issues We at labkafe [ http://labkafe.com/ ], prefer taxmantra [ http://taxmantra.com/ ] for our legal requirements.

No. The leaders of the state parties of Jammu and Kashmir have been spreading wrong ideas and notions to deter the government of India from abolishing these two Articles.If the Indian government revokes Articles 35 A or Article 370, it will not end the relationship between India and the state of Jammu and Kashmir. This is because:The basis of the merger of the state of Jammu and Kashmir is not Article 370 or 35A but the state is merged with India on the Instrument of Accession signed on 26 October, 1947 between the ruler of the Kashmir and the representative of the government of India. Till this Instrument of Accession is valid, Jammu Kashmir will remain the part of India.In fact the state leaders of Kashmir should know that the Instrument of Accession is irrevocable because now Jammu and Kashmir is a part of Indian Union ( Under Article 1 and Schedule 1 of the Constitution) and the states of the Union have not been given any right under the Constitution to secede from the Union of India. Because of this reason, the word ‘Union’ was specially used in Article 1 in place of ‘Federation’. Dr Ambedkar had clarified this position in the Constituent Assembly. The states of India were not sovereign entities before merging with India, and hence they cannot secede from India. This is applicable not to just the state of J and K bu all other states of the Indian Union. Therefor no state should harbour the ambition to secede away from India and become an independent nation.In past 70 years, Article 370 has extended majority of the provisions of the Constitution of India to the state. Out of 395 Articles of the Indian Constitution 260 Articles and the power of the Parliament over 94 subjects of the Union list (out of 97 subjects) have been enforced in the state of Jammu and Kashmir. These Articles and powers of the Parliament will remain in force even if Article 370 is removed. The removal of Article 370 will not invalidate the past orders issued by the President. Law does not have ipso facto effect. Moreover, when Article 370 will be removed the provisions shall be made for future regulation. It will not be done away in blank.But, the real problem in revoking Article 370 is not its legal consequences as the state leaders have been claiming but the process of removal itself. One of the conditions for the removal of Article 370, as mentioned in the Article it self is the prior consent of the Constituent Assembly (CA) of the Jammu and Kashmir. Since CA is non-existent, the Supreme Court may issue guidelines authorizing Parliament to amend the provision of the 370. Hopefully, the Supreme Court judgement will come soon on this issue.However, it needs to further clarify that there is no such requirement of CA in Amending another Article 35 A, which can be done by the Parliament anytime.

Revoking of Art370 & Art35A of the Constitution of India tantamount to ending relationship of Jammu & Kashmir with India’ - this is the greatest lie & propaganda to benefit only the blood thirsty so called political class of Jammu and Kashmir.Please understand the timeline; the Riyasat e Jammu & Kashmir or the princely state legally acceded to India in Oct 1947 & according to Indian Evidence Act; 1872 this is non reversible.This instrument of accession (IoA) is unconditional & is same as whatever is signed with 562 other Princely states which joined the dominion of India after partition.This IoA is the sole & binding legal link of J&K state with Indian Republic & no other.Article 370 came into existence 3 years later in 1950 when Constitution of India was finally drafted & placed for voting in the Constituent Assembly of India formed for the purpose of framing the Constitution by our founding fathers.Therefore Art370 has no relation whatsoever with instrument of accession that Maharaja Hari Singh of J&K signed with India 3 years back.Now Art35A was promulgated in J&K state through a Presidential order in 1954 another 4 years later without the approval of the Indian Parliament & there is no cross reference of it with neither Instrument of accession nor Art370.J&K constituent assembly was dissolved in 1956 & separate Constitution of J&K was adopted without any reference to Art370 of the Constitution of India.Art370 states that it is a temporary & transient provision & power to amend it lies with Constituent Assembly of J&K which is non existing at the moment. In view of the above facts relationship of Indian Republic lies solely with instrument of accession of 1947; all other talks are simply baseless & unfounded.The constituent assembly of India formed in 1946 to frame the Constitution of India, which had 299 members had also members from Jammu and Kashmir since 1946 & one of them was represented by Sheikh Abdullah; therefore it was decided even before partition of India that the state of Jammu and Kashmir shall be part of India otherwise all Pakistani members separated & joined Constituent assembly of Pakistan.Dr Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar had serious reservations on Art 370 & he refused to draft it; ultimately it was incorporated in the Constitution of India without his authorship. What is Article 370 ? Why Dr. B.R Ambedkar refused to draft Article 370 ?Read More with references & evidences, Why can’t the Indian government remove article 370?Indian Evidence Act, 1872Constituent Assembly of India - Wikipedia