Sign Presentation for Administrative Online

airSlate SignNow is a powerful platform that allows you to create, send, and eSign documents effortlessly. By using this tool, you can integrate your presentation online with easy document workflows, ensuring that your audience can review and sign important documents right away.

With airSlate SignNow, you can share documents seamlessly during presentations online, allowing team members to collaborate in real-time. This ensures everyone can contribute to the document, making your presentations more interactive and productive.

airSlate SignNow offers several pricing plans that cater to different business sizes and needs. You can choose a plan that fits your budget while ensuring you have all the necessary features to create effective presentations online.

Yes, airSlate SignNow integrates smoothly with various platforms such as Google Drive, Dropbox, and Salesforce. These integrations allow you to access, manage, and enhance your documents easily while hosting presentations online.

Absolutely! airSlate SignNow offers various customization options to tailor your documents for presentations online. You can add your branding, logos, and personalized content to make your presentations more engaging and professional.

Yes, airSlate SignNow prioritizes security, implementing advanced encryption protocols to protect all documents. You can confidently share and eSign sensitive documents during presentations online without compromising security.

airSlate SignNow is designed with user-friendliness in mind, making it easy for anyone to create and manage documents. The intuitive interface allows you to prepare your presentations online with minimal effort, streamlining the entire process.

Neither (and no, Aramaic didn’t evolve from Arabic).Syriac is a variety of Aramaic, and Arabic definitely didn’t develop from it or any other varitey of Aramaic (notwithstanding a couple of others here who think Aram and Arab sounding similar is somehow evidence. It isn’t—not once you know what Aram meant in ancient times (i.e, what is now Syria: Aramaya literally means “of Syria”—a reflection of the Syrian origin of the language):Aram (region) - WikipediaIt also starts with an Aleph; Arabic’s name starts with a Ayin (and no, Aramaic didn’t lose its Ayins in ancient times, nor did Arabic gain Ayins).Arabic lacks the Northwest Semitic innovations common to both Hebrew and Aramaic (such as word-initial mutation of w to y). It also lacks Aramaic’s suffix (which then became the language’s equivalent to the definite article EDIT: I’ve found other interpretations, such as an extension of the feminine, or as an inversion of the ha pronoun—think “noun+ha”, instead if “ha+noun” (Pat-El, 2009, “The development of the Semitic Definite Article: a Syntactic approach), or its use of dhu as a purely genitive marker (Frozen itself in a genitive form).Arabic also doesn’t have Aramaic’s tendency of turning n’s to r’s ( bar in Aramaic, bin in Arabic, for example), not did it share the trend toward spirantization (so it can’t even be said to very influenced by Aramaic, beyond some loanwords. EDIT: and apparently, they got those from writing, since the pronounciation is too archaic, or just plain off***). Finally, Arabic largely lost the originaly conceptive derivation (this takes some explanation: in PS, you got a concept for a root—say m-l-k, by adding an ūt ending. So m-l-k = malkūtum* “kingship”. Arabic borrowed this word from Aramaic, but beyond a few loanwords of this form from it and Hebrew, this form was lost early in Arabic’s evolution; concepts are instead done in other ways: most commonly, like this: 3-S-b > 3aSabiyyah).Similarly, Aramaic lacks the following features that Arabic exhibited since the earliest attestations in text (as complete sentences, anyway)1-fi (Arabic for “in”)2-inna and anna (I forget the technical term in English, but they look like this in Arabic: إن، أن(.3-the use of the maf’ul form.4–negative ma (this is partly shared with Hebrew, but in Hebrew’s case it’s largely a poetic device, and is not used at all in regular speech or writing (it’s in the bible); Arabic’s ma no longer just means “what”, but also means “not”)5-broken plurals (this btw isn’t as helpful in figuring out where Arabic belongs; we’ll return to this).Finally: both are first attested withing a century of each other—not enough time for Aramaic to become Arabic (and certainly not enough to develop the complex case system Proto-Arabic had, which survives in our writing to this day: that system btw is more complex than what PS had).Arabic is currently classified as a Primary branch of Central Semitic (the other is NW Semitic—Aramaic goes here, along with Hebrew, Amorite, and possibly Sabaean and its kin, though Sabaean and its kin might themselves form a primary offshoot of Central Semitic). So the features it does share with Aramaic are typically those it inherited from proto-central-Semitic, spoken sometime before 2000BC. Keep in mind that Semitic languages exhibit signs of constant contact for long period before they split off from each other: this is why Moabite—a Canaanite dialect—has features similar to those in Aramaic and Arabic (the use of n instead of m for plurals comes to mind).So Arabic didn’t evolve from Aramaic. While we’re at it, it sure as heck didn’t evolve from Sabaean** or any other Epigraphic South Arabian Language (Arabic lacks the bizarre turn those fellows took with the case system, which uses m, n, and null to indicate various states of definitiveness; the specifics have prompted one linguist to propose that Aramaic and Sabaean are somehow related more closely than previously believed (Sabaean doens’t have the w-y change though, so…)).Additionally, the broken plural system used there and in Arabic are different in form anyway, with slightly different strategies (the differences are even greater with Ethio-Semitic). It’s now being proposed (notably by Huehnergard and al-Jallad), that all broken plurals are in fact derived from a PS strategy for plurals, lost in Akkadian and NW Semitic.So Arabic evolved directly from a proto-Central Semitic dialect. The only question is where?Well, I can tell you where it didn’t:1-Yemen: not attested there till c. The 1st Century BC. It has another issue—one shared by Oman (see below).2-Central Arabia: the Thamudic inscriptions there typically reveal an undeciphered language (if it were Arabic, we’d know: keep reading)3-Ihsa’: Arabic is found there, but it postdates the first record of either Arabic or Arabs.4-Oman: we know South Semitic languages were spoken there first: they all have a notable Cushitic substratum that Sabaean and Arabic lack. That should tell you something obvious, so I’ll not type up the paragraph needed to elaborate.5-Ethiopia: they did their own thing there too, and this is first attested around the same time Arabic is.6-the fertile crescent proper (obvious reasons).So where is Arabic from?Well, there’s one area left out: the marginal regions in what is now Jordan, the Sinai, and eastern Syria, and the Hijaz (particularly the north). That’s the only area that hasn’t been ruled out. Any inscriptions?well, yes: here are some inscriptions—mostly in Jordan and Hijaz (I’ll transliterate into the languages current writing system: any missing long vowels should be easy to fill in):مرد عل اجرفس كسر هسلسلة (if you know your Holy Land History, you can date this one)فيفعل لا فدا و لا اثرا فكن هنا يبغنا الموت لا ابغاه فكن هنا ارد جرج لا يردنالصعب بن وهب هسفرلشر بن نشدال بن فرس و هرق هنقة (the last part would be spelled nowadays as و هرّق هناقة(here’s a curse (can you spot the deity?)فهلت عورم عور حجر بعد سفر (with modern spelling: فهلّات عوّري ما عوّر حجر بعد سفر)A random king’s name from the area:حارثLet me put this way: I’ll let any Arab who reads the above take a stab at translation. There’s one word here that may be not so obvious, but context might clear it up (these are all rock inscriptions: that’s all the context needed)I mentioned tow people here: Huehnergard and al-Jallad. Their articles are readily available online, and they do a great job explaining the evidence. Conclusive? No. It’s possible more inscriptions could upend this, so this might make this all outdated anyway. But currently, that origin makes the most sense: the earliest mention of Arabs (or any Arabic word), are as soldiers fighting in Northern Syria at Qarqar, 853BC, as part of a coalition of a dozen princes against Shalmaneser III. As gindibu—their leader—is listed as a prince, this suggest they’ve been around long enough to form at least a proto-state.Anyone arguing for a Yemeni origin (or anywhere else) for the language would have to explain the earlier mention in the North, and also explain how a people in Yemen were able to bring a contingent all the way to Northern Syria—and not be noted for this by anyone. Finally, why no evidence of Arabic in the south till centuries later—by which time the Arabs produced three polities in the north (Gindibu’s Arabs, Qeder, Nabataea)?EDIT: I’ve fixed so typos, and added suggestions for further typos to be fixed.**there are two branches of Semitic represented in these inscriptions: South and Central (Ethiosemitic traditionally under the former, though it might in fact be separate). Sabaean is in the latter, as are a few of the other Old South Arabian languages.***It seems strange, until you consider that even in many Arab areas, Aramaic was used for administration (the Nabataeans were Arab, and spoke Arabic, but used Aramaic for administration. This was a pro-business policy: the Nabataeans—much like Arabs later on, and into the present—have always appreciated business: they were as much merchants as nomad and warriors.)

A number of years ago I testified on behalf of the defence as an expert witness in a Crown v. the accused in an invitation to sexual touching and possession of child pornography case in a Canadian criminal court.Those are pretty serious charges and someone that engages in such behaviour should be separated from society for an extended period of time and then monitored afterwards.The police investigation started with a complaint by the mother to NCMEC that the accused had tried to lure her daughter into sexual relationship.When the Toronto police obtained a warrant and seized the accused’s computer they found evidence that he used the IRC online name in the mother’s complaint and they found hundreds of child porn images. Resulting in the charges.So why would I act for the defence?When I was first asked, I was given all kinds of assurances that the accused was innocent even though the police had seized his computer and found hundreds of images and had evidence that he had chatted online with an underage girl.I explained that I would examine the images of the hard disk that the police forensic team had prepared and I would examine the evidence submitted by the girl’s mother and then make my decision as to what assistance I would provide.At first it was extremely challenging to perform my examination. The police would not release a copy of the disk image, and rather insisted that I use their computer equipment using their software at their premises.I tried working in a tiny windowless room at one of the precincts on their laptop running their software - a copy of Encase on a Windows machine. Yuk. Severely limiting. Not only that the officer entered the room every 5 minutes to ‘chat’ and I would stop what I was doing, and turn the laptop away from him.What a joke. They claimed that I could not be in possession of the image as that would be a crime. Uh.. no it wouldn’t. The act specifically allows possession.Section 163.(6) No person shall be convicted of an offence under this section if the act that is alleged to constitute the offence(a) has a legitimate purpose related to the administration of justice or to science, medicine, education or art; and(b) does not pose an undue risk of harm to persons under the age of eighteen years.The defence lawyer was able to win a motion allowing me proper access to the evidence and I was given copies of the drive image to examine using my own tools and software. However the forensic team Sgt told me that he disagreed with the ruling and could have me arrested if I was ‘caught’ with the evidence.I knew it to be bs, but for quite some some time while working on the case I kept a copy of that section of the criminal code in my car and in my office.Since the girl’s mother has presented evidence of what she purported to be logs of an online chat I requested an image of her hard drive as well. The police refused as that they claimed would create a hardship for the victim.Hardship - Huh?I testified in a motion that since she was out of the country, she was in the U.S., that the police in that state could assist if require and all that really needed to be done, if both the Crown and the defence agreed, was to take the machine to a local computer shop and ask them to install a new drive of the same size and copy the contents across so they could continue to use their computer. Then to put the original disk in a box and ship it to the good Sgt of the Toronto Police along with a signed statement from the technician that he did that without making any deliberate changes to the original contents.The judge was pretty agreeable to that but the crown argued against it. I testified that it was the best evidence but I was prepared to offer my assessment of the printed logs and my assessment of the transcript of the mother’s testimony.The judge ended hearing only my assessment of that. No copy of the victim’s disk was ever obtained, nor required.In the end, I had the image of the accused’s computer and photocopies of the victim’s log and the transcript of the mother’s testimony.Let’s start with the ‘log’. It was doctored. It was not a real log from IRC. It certainly looked like one, but there were inconsistencies from what an actual log produced by the IRC client she was using and what was presented. Moreover, she ended up referring to a different conversation log in her testimony, one that had time stamps. The one originally submitted to NCMEC had no timestamp. That was a setting in that software. On or off. Moreover in the testimony she and the girl testified that they had never chatted with the accused before that conversation, yet..At the start of the log there was a line item..“nickname of the accused” is online.That meant that the user of that IRC client had created an alert to notify them when the accused came online in IRC. Interesting.I proposed to the court that a more likely scenario was that the mother had set a trap for the accused. Set the alert so she would know he when he was online, enter into a chat with him, and then fabricate a conversation.edit added: this gave the mother the IP address and a date and time when he was online. Subsequent warrant and examination of the accused’s ISP’s records identified him as the user of that IP address at the time.To demonstrate, I fabricated a fictitious log for the court involving an online chat between Hamlet and Horatio. With time stamps.I read Hamlet in open court. How cool is that?It had also been presented into evidence that the mother worked for a local ISP and had taken some computer forensic courses.I testified that I could not theorize motive for a deception other than perhaps some prior online argument of some unknown nature but that the mother certainly had method and opportunity to deceive.The judge asked me what I would look for if I had access to the mother’s hard drive. I explained how a filing system works and how logs are created with sequential allocations to a file entry and that I would expect to find only one version of a legitimate log, even if copies were made. But I would expect to find multiple versions of this log since I believe it to be true that it was fabricatedThe Crown eventually in his own statements referred to “the less than compelling evidence of the mother”, but the Crown still had the huge amount of irrefutable evidence of the possession charge.Now.. what about those hundreds of child pornography images?Yes, they existed. There were two sets.One set existed in a download directory for IRC. Virtually all were deleted. The ones that weren’t were quite new to the directory. I examined the IRC configuration and found that the accused’s IRC would auto-accept sent files from anyone.This guy’s machine had a huge number of images and files of all description in that directory and it appeared that he would go in maybe once a week and delete everything he did not want and move off what he did.No child pornography images were moved to other directories and the vast majority had already been deleted. I theorized that the ones that were not deleted simply had not been reviewed yet; and moreover the files that were deleted would have become unretrievable over the natural course of operating the computer.Now then, the other set.These were all in the browser cache, and they were virtually all thumbnail images. Hundreds of them. But..When I examined the raw browser history logs I found an interesting timeline.The accused was searching for different music genres for download. Several times during a one session he followed links that appeared to be for downloads of music but were for porn. Porn of every type imaginable.Several of these pages had large numbers of thumbnails. What was interesting is the time spent on the pages before the user attempted to go to another site or page. Seconds.It was also interesting that several of the pages caused new browser windows to open with more porn.In total, there was a 15 minute period on one day when all of the images that the Crown submitted as evidence were downloaded into the cache of the accused’s browser. Moreover it was doubtful that the accused even realized the full extent of the images since as I showed the court that one had to scroll down on the pages to see the thumbnails as across the top were simply more ads for more sites.I also testified that over the natural course of operating the computer these thumbnails would have been deleted by the browser and would have never been retrievable by the user.The judge had more questions for me in his attempt to understand the situation more clearly. The defence lawyer sat back and was feeling pretty good.The Crown and the good Sgt sat there clicking their pens for quite some time.The Crown ended up asking the court for a stay of prosecution in exchange for an undertaking by the accused to promise not to engage in chats with underage girls for the purposes of exploitation.This could have had a terrible ending for the accused. If he could not afford the professional fees that I charged, or could not afford a decent lawyer he would have been found guilty or he would have just plead guilty.A follow up, I saw that Sgt a few days later and he told me he was still positive that the accused was guilty and that I helped a guilty man go free. I asked him if he had any other evidence except that which I showed was all bs, and he said no, but he knew he was guilty. Guilty of what I wondered aloud.Sorry for any typos - written on my phone.

There are a lot of lists and directories available to locate best birthday cake makers in Delhi and NCR. Functionmania is one such website that offers huge lists of birthday cake makers as well as a list of cake shops. They have the choicest selections of these shops that seem to offer quality and customized services to their customers.

Niche skill sets and stubborn companies.Niche skillsPlenty of job boards offer remote work. Most of these are “legitimate,” in that there are real companies who pay good wages — and you can actually work from home.The skills tends to be skewed towards customer service, digital marketing, development, operations. Amazon hires plenty of stay at home moms that take customer service calls and messages at home.That said, considering the number of applicants actually interested in remote work, there’s a gap between supply of skilled labor (low) and demand (high).If you really, really want to work remote and don’t have the skills….1) Get a full-time job for a year that allows you to build those skills and then transition to remote and 2) Get certified online in x courses, get a few freelance projects under your belt, and then apply. I don’t think it would be hard to take a few months to reinvent yourself.2. Stubborn CompaniesThere are a lot of jobs that could be remote. My friend works a shitty social media job which could be done from home but is stuck in the office. Lots of my recruiter friends could do a majority of their cold calling and emailing from home and skype, but their employer requires them to show up for ‘team meetings.’Security issues are often stated as the reason why companies can’t go remote, i.e. they can’t allow employees to login from an offsite server. But I think that’s just a bad excuse to uphold the status quo. These problems have already been solved by companies that have 100% remote workers. Kean Graham runs a startup that is fully remote and has 100+ remote employees. There are many more like him. Just ask someone who’s done it. But companies have illegitimate fears and don’t care that much about people to overhaul their operations (fear of change).Some remote job boards:Dynamite JobsWeworkremotelyRemote.coWorkingnomadLinkedIn, 222,000+ remote jobsGood luck!

It all comes down to individual choice and what you are willing to allow someone to do for you with your travel and how much trust you are willing to give them to get things right for you. I know there are many people out there who love spending time planning their trips and looking for the best deals. One of the reasons I got into the travel business was my love for planning and customising vacations. Not just for myself but family and friends too. They loved the fact that I was saving them time and money. Once I opened my own travel business I was exposed to so many more resources than I had before. I could now save them even more time and money. When it comes to using a travel professional the question is should you pay them for their services to plan your trip? Yes! But here's the thing, we have our clients sign an "Intent to Book" contract and pay a fee. In the contract we go over what they can expect from us. The contract also specifies that when the client books with us, what out of the fee we keep for administrative costs and what is applied to the client's final payment. If the client elects not to book with us then the contract very clearly states that we keep the whole fee as compensation for our time spent researching and planning their vacation. We never used to charge fees until reality stepped in and showed us we needed to protect ourselves. We had one client we spent almost 20 hours planning their trip completely customised vacation including everything they wanted and coming in $2,000 under budget. We presented them with the first draft of the itinerary with the package pricing. We went over their itinerary with them; we had included everything they asked for. We then asked them to look it over together without us being there and then we could make any changes they wanted or go ahead and book it. They called me the next day as planned and told me they had booked everything themselves as they could get it cheaper online than we had quoted them. The trip in the end cost them over $5,000 MORE than I had originally quoted them for the entire package putting them more than $3,000 OVER their budget. Now you are asking why when they said they could book it cheaper. If they had booked through us everything would have been pre-paid upfront in US dollars and included items they wanted that would normally cost extra. Prices and services were then locked in. When they booked everything themselves they couldn't pre-pay most of it upfront. Prices and services changed and they were charged international fees and exchange rates on their credit cards when they did pay at the time of service. They also didn't get exactly what they wanted. For example, my suppliers included breakfast per the client's request with all their hotel stays in the hotels the client had specified. There was no option to include breakfast when they booked direct with the hotels they wanted so they had to pay for breakfast. Some of their breakfasts were $40 per person per day! Their day tours through our suppliers included some extras for them. When they booked direct they didn't get those extras, they had to pay for them or the options to add them weren't available. All the extras they wanted included in their vacation were included in the package pricing I gave them. They did their own research online but didn't compare Apples to Apples they compared Apples to Oranges and it taught them an expensive lesson. One they will not repeat again.I know people are willing to pay $25 each way for someone to book their flights. This is not an unreasonable cost. Before we started charging to book flights we researched and were surprised that some people were charging as much as $100 each way to book air. I guess some people are willing to pay that for the convenience of having someone else do it for them. The average price we found was $25 each way. If someone was doing just a straight round trip then it would be $50. If they were doing multiple destinations it would be $25 per destination.When it comes to anything other than airfare there was a wide range of pricing from $100 to over $5000. We set our Intent to Book fees (starting at $250) based on number of people, length of travel and how much customization they want.If someone likes and trusts the person doing the planning then the planner can just about name their price and the people will pay. People are willing to pay someone to take away the headache of planning, finding the best deals, best locations, etc so they don't have to do it themselves.

what are the fundamental features of a modern LMS? As you haven't said what you mean by "modern" I will make up my own definition and then answer that question. Let's say that a primitive LMS is a collection of tools--for resource sharing, discussion, syllabus, assignments, quiz/test, etc. The primitive LMS was largely used for pushing information and course content to students. In blended or online classes the discussion forum was also used for discussion activities.  The primitive LMS was about getting students to jump through the right hoops, in FERPA-induced privacy.A modern LMS (if one yet exists) is task-oriented rather than tool-or...