PCI DSS Compliant SignNow's CRM Vs Streak CRM

Check out the reviews of the airSlate SignNow CRM vs. Streak CRM to compare the benefits, features, tools, and pricing of each solution.

Award-winning eSignature solution

Overview: PCI DSS context for signNow and Streak CRM

This comparison focuses on PCI DSS–relevant aspects when using signNow alongside CRM workflows versus relying on Streak CRM for document and payment-related processes. It explains capabilities that affect cardholder data scope, what each product typically handles, and how design choices influence whether a deployment can be maintained within a PCI-compliant environment. The goal is to clarify practical differences in encryption, redaction, hosted payment options, and integration patterns so technical and compliance teams can assess risk and control responsibilities before sending or processing payment-related forms.

Why this comparison matters for compliance and operations

Understanding how signNow and Streak CRM affect PCI DSS scope helps organizations decide which toolchain reduces cardholder data exposure and supports necessary technical and administrative controls for compliant processing.

Why this comparison matters for compliance and operations

Common PCI-related challenges in eSignature and CRM workflows

  • Unintended storage of card data in email threads or CRM records increases PCI scope and audit complexity.
  • Embedding payment fields without a hosted gateway can force the eSignature platform into a compliance role.
  • Limited redaction or field-level encryption means teams must remove card data manually before archiving.
  • Lack of clear vendor attestation increases time and cost for evidence collection during PCI assessments.

Representative user profiles

Payments Manager

Oversees payment collection workflows and needs a setup that keeps cardholder data off internal systems; values hosted payment integrations, tokenization options, and detailed vendor security documentation for audits and evidence collection.

IT Compliance Lead

Responsible for scoping PCI requirements across systems, verifying vendor attestations, and implementing technical controls like encryption, SSO, and restricted admin access to minimize auditors' scope and meet requirement evidence needs.

Who typically evaluates PCI DSS for signNow vs Streak CRM

Compliance officers, IT security engineers, and payments teams commonly review how eSignature and CRM tools affect cardholder data scope.

  • Payments teams evaluating hosted payment integrations with eSignatures
  • Security/compliance staff defining scope for PCI assessments
  • Sales and operations teams aligning document workflows and retention

Decisions are usually cross-functional and require input on technical controls, vendor responsibilities, and operational procedures to limit PCI exposure.

be ready to get more

Choose a better solution

Integration features that affect PCI scope

Integrations determine whether card data touches your systems. The right combination of hosted payments, field redaction, and metadata-only sync reduces PCI burden and supports compliant operation across systems.

Hosted Payment Redirect

Hosted gateways let customers enter card data on the payment processor's page so the eSignature and CRM systems avoid receiving raw card numbers. This pattern minimizes cardholder data in the application stack and is commonly recommended for PCI scope reduction.

Field Redaction

Redaction removes or masks sensitive fields after signing so stored documents do not contain card numbers. Automated redaction that runs before storage reduces manual review and lowers the chance of inadvertent retention.

Metadata-only Sync

Sync only non-sensitive metadata (status, timestamps, tokenized references) from the eSignature system to the CRM. Keeping tokens rather than card data in CRM records maintains transaction context without expanding PCI scope.

Tokenization Support

When tokenized payment references are available, the CRM can link to a processor token for repeat charges without storing card numbers. This pattern offloads cardholder data controls to the payment processor.

How a PCI-aware eSignature + CRM integration typically operates

This outlines the typical interaction sequence when keeping cardholder data out of CRM storage while capturing signed consent.

  • Initiate request: Sender generates the agreement
  • Redirect for payment: User completes payment on gateway
  • Collect signature: Signature captured by eSignature provider
  • Store metadata: CRM stores non-card references
Collect signatures
24x
faster
Reduce costs by
$30
per document
Save up to
40h
per employee / month

Quick setup checklist for PCI-aware signNow vs Streak CRM workflows

Follow these steps to design a workflow that reduces cardholder data exposure when combining eSignature and CRM tools.

  • 01
    Map data flows: Identify where card data might appear
  • 02
    Avoid embedded fields: Use hosted payment pages instead
  • 03
    Enforce access controls: Limit who can view records
  • 04
    Retain evidence: Keep audit logs for assessments
be ready to get more

Why choose airSlate SignNow

  • Free 7-day trial. Choose the plan you need and try it risk-free.
  • Honest pricing for full-featured plans. airSlate SignNow offers subscription plans with no overages or hidden fees at renewal.
  • Enterprise-grade security. airSlate SignNow helps you comply with global security standards.
illustrations signature

Recommended workflow settings to limit PCI scope

Configure these settings when linking eSignature and CRM systems to reduce cardholder data exposure and support compliance evidence collection.

Feature Configuration
Hosted Payment Integration Enable redirect
Document Redaction Automatic redaction
Metadata Sync Tokens only
Access Controls RBAC enforced
Audit Logging Detailed retention

Platform and device considerations for PCI-aware usage

Ensure that all client devices and platforms used to access eSignature and CRM systems meet baseline security configurations before processing any payment-related transactions.

  • Desktop browsers: Recent versions
  • Mobile apps: Use official apps
  • Network security: Trusted networks

Maintain up-to-date browsers and apps, enforce device security policies such as disk encryption and screen locks, and avoid using public or unmanaged networks when collecting signatures or initiating payment redirects to protect cardholder data.

Security capabilities relevant to PCI considerations

Data encryption: AES-256 standard
Transport security: TLS 1.2+
Access control: Role-based
Authentication: SSO/SAML support
Audit logging: Detailed trails
Hosted payments: Gateway redirects

Industry use examples with PCI considerations

Two practical scenarios show how signNow integrated workflows differ from Streak-centric approaches when payment data is involved.

Retail Payments Flow

A retail team needs to collect signed authorizations and card-on-file consent via an online form that must avoid storing raw card numbers

  • Use of signNow with a hosted payment gateway integration keeps the payment interaction on the gateway
  • This reduces card data in your application and lowers PCI scope

Resulting in fewer controls to validate during an assessment and reduced risk of exposure.

Service Agreement with Invoicing

A professional services firm wants signed SOWs and occasional ad-hoc card payments captured during client onboarding

  • Relying on Streak CRM records and Gmail threads can store payment references and increase scope
  • Using an eSignature provider configured to redirect payment entry to a certified processor keeps card data outside CRM records

Leading to clearer separation of duties and simpler PCI evidence gathering for audits.

Best practices for secure, PCI-aware eSignature and CRM workflows

Adopt operational and technical controls that collectively minimize cardholder data exposure, solidify vendor responsibilities, and simplify PCI evidence collection.

Design forms to avoid direct card capture
Wherever possible, route payment entry to certified payment gateways using hosted pages, rather than placing card fields in eSignature forms or CRM notes. This helps ensure cardholder data does not traverse or reside in corporate email, CRM records, or document storage that would otherwise increase PCI scope.
Use tokenization and references
Store payment tokens or processor references instead of card numbers in CRM or eSignature metadata. Document the token lifecycle and retention policy so audit evidence shows only non-sensitive identifiers are retained in-house.
Enforce least privilege and SSO
Configure role-based access and single sign-on to centralize account control, reduce credential sprawl, and provide clear authentication logs for PCI evidence. Restrict document access to necessary personnel and monitor admin-level activity.
Maintain vendor attestations and evidence
Collect security documentation from vendors about encryption, logging, and third-party audits, and retain these documents for PCI assessments. Keep records updated and reference which controls are vendor-managed versus organization-managed.

Common issues and troubleshooting for PCI-aware workflows

When integrating eSignature and CRM systems with payment processes, teams frequently encounter a predictable set of issues. The guidance below helps diagnose scope increases, data leakage, and integration gaps.

Direct feature comparison: signNow versus Streak CRM

This table compares capabilities that most affect PCI scope and practical compliance tasks when choosing between signNow and Streak CRM for document and payment workflows.

Feature signNow Streak CRM
Hosted payment redirect
Field redaction
API for tokenization
Native eSignature Limited
be ready to get more

Get legally-binding signatures now!

Risks and compliance consequences to watch for

Scope expansion: Higher audit burden
Data exposure: Potential breach fines
Failed audits: Remediation costs
Reputational harm: Customer distrust
Operational delays: Blocked transactions
Vendor gaps: Control shortfalls

Product comparison across common enterprise features

A feature-oriented comparison across popular eSignature and CRM products highlights capabilities that influence PCI risk and operational suitability for payment-related workflows.

Product signNow Streak CRM DocuSign Adobe Sign HelloSign
Free tier available Yes Yes No Limited trial Yes
API access Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Hosted payment guidance Yes No Yes Yes No
Field redaction support Yes No Yes Yes Limited
SAML SSO Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
walmart logo
exonMobil logo
apple logo
comcast logo
facebook logo
FedEx logo
be ready to get more

Get legally-binding signatures now!