Install eSignature Presentation Myself
Make the most out of your eSignature workflows with airSlate SignNow
Extensive suite of eSignature tools
Robust integration and API capabilities
Advanced security and compliance
Various collaboration tools
Enjoyable and stress-free signing experience
Extensive support
Sign PDF for HR Secure
Keep your eSignature workflows on track
Our user reviews speak for themselves
Install eSignature Presentation Myself. Explore by far the most user-warm and friendly experience with airSlate SignNow. Manage all of your papers processing and discussing method digitally. Change from hand held, document-structured and erroneous workflows to automated, electronic and faultless. You can actually make, produce and signal any papers on any product just about anywhere. Ensure that your important business cases don't slide overboard.
Discover how to Install eSignature Presentation Myself. Stick to the easy guideline to start:
- Design your airSlate SignNow account in click throughs or log in together with your Facebook or Google accounts.
- Take advantage of the 30-working day free trial version or pick a rates program that's ideal for you.
- Locate any legitimate web template, construct on the web fillable forms and reveal them tightly.
- Use superior capabilities to Install eSignature Presentation Myself.
- Sign, personalize signing get and accumulate in-person signatures ten times faster.
- Established intelligent alerts and acquire notices at each step.
Transferring your activities into airSlate SignNow is simple. What follows is a straightforward procedure to Install eSignature Presentation Myself, in addition to tips to help keep your co-workers and lovers for better alliance. Inspire your employees with the finest tools to remain on the top of company processes. Enhance productiveness and scale your company more quickly.
How it works
Rate your experience
-
Best ROI. Our customers achieve an average 7x ROI within the first six months.
-
Scales with your use cases. From SMBs to mid-market, airSlate SignNow delivers results for businesses of all sizes.
-
Intuitive UI and API. Sign and send documents from your apps in minutes.
A smarter way to work: —how to industry sign banking integrate
FAQs
-
Why does no one make a movie series based on Asimov's Foundation?
One cannot deny that putting Asimov's Foundation series up on the big screen presents a real challenge, between screenwriters, producers, and directors, to say nothing of the moguls who finance and greenlight the project only if they think it might make a profit.The easiest part to explain is the moguls. Experience often shows that if you aim high as to intelligence, the movie ends up as a small "indie" film, or about as successful as one, but if you aim low, there is little to no risk of losing money by insulting the intelligence of the audience. Even the very stupidest movies can become "cult classics" out of their sheer stupidity (think of "Food Fight" or "Garbage Pail Kids" or "Felix the Cat" or “Plan 9 From Outer Space”). Foundation does not scale down well in intelligence, so very little money will ever likely be put into it.Producers and directors want to put lots of explosions and space battles in it because they think this will make the movie more exciting to audiences, but this would so severely betray and violate the whole point and charm of a Foundation film. The temptation seems to be to use the title, and perhaps some of the characters and basic situations, and then throw a lot of name stars and useless special effects, love affairs and sex scenes, shootouts and chases, all with no connection to the story at it, and hope that makes it a hit. But it is the writers who have the biggest challenge.Dr. Asimov gives this account of his rereading of the original Foundation trilogy when preparing to begin its next novel, “Foundation’s Edge”: “… about the end of May, I picked up my own copy of The Foundation Trilogy and began reading. I had to. For one thing, I hadn't read the Trilogy in thirty years and while I remembered the general plot, I did not remember the details. Besides, before beginning a new Foundation novel I had to immerse myself in the style and atmosphere of the series. I read it with mounting uneasiness. I kept waiting for something to happen, and nothing ever did. All three volumes, all the nearly quarter of a million words, consisted of thoughts and of conversations. No action. No physical suspense. What was all the fuss about, then? Why did everyone want more of that stuff?—To be sure, I couldn't help but notice that I was turning the pages eagerly, and that I was upset when I finished the book, and that I wanted more, but I was the author, for goodness' sake.”One of the biggest criticisms of the work is that it seems to consist almost entirely of people talking in rooms. An attempt to turn those conversations into impressive space battles would invariably fall flat on its face. The complaint has also been made that there are no continuing characters in this series. Though a person might show up in a couple segments (e. g. Salvor Hardin), and of course, Hari Seldon’s influence in the form of the Seldon Plan runs throughout the whole series, unifying it, there are no characters who exist throughout the whole thing. There is always the question of what to leave out and what to keep in, and what might be added that an audience would want to see. Audiences are often hard to please, and probably hardest when dealing with going from a book to a movie where the book is so well-known that everyone watching the movie will quickly see what was changed, and generally comment unfavorably on that difference.Then there is the problem of what to do with the technology. Extrapolations of 1940’s technology pervade the series, and when putting it to film what should one do? The most common approach seems to update the technology to predictable extrapolations of whatever technology is current when the film is being shot. It is generally easier and can help present day audiences to feel we are dealing with a “future” when seeing technologies which seem so to us today. But such attempts rapidly become dated, and instead of portraying a time at least 12,000 years in the future it ends up instead portraying a time at least 20 years past. Think of how AOL-styled emails of “You’ve Got Mail” (1998) rapidly came to look ridiculous in comparison to the snail mail of “Shop Around the Corner” (1940) that still hold up. Or again, “The Puppet Masters” (1994), following the book so closely in some ways (especially in the first part) and in the casting of the three main leads, but then deviated in several ways (most notably from a technological standpoint) by introducing satellite heat signature recognition as a way of detecting who is infected and deleting the whole Titans subplot.The biggest problem in that area was the slow progress in computer technology in the Foundation series. Who could have believed in the 1940’s and 1950’s that computers would become so powerful and at the same time so microminiaturized within a scant 50 years, and yet at the same time Robotics (and especially the ability to create a functional humanoid robot, complete with at least apparent feelings, thoughts, creativity, problem-solving, and imagination, as to approximate human capabilities, coupled with machine-like perfection and speed, remains far behind the levels that Asimov expected for the same period in his Robot series. So here we are supposedly 12,000 or more years in the future and yet in the story shipboard computers are barely above the level of the surprisingly primitive computers of the Apollo Lunar Module. Since computing power does factor in on occasion, what do we do with that in such a movie?Granted, these are all serious challenges, far too great for the limited imaginations of our typical Hollywood types to work with (hence their proclivity to make dumb sequels and retreads, all because they just can’t think of anything else), so it really is quite possible that there may never be a Foundation movie, or just as bad, never a credible adaptation of it that retains anything much at all of what the series is truly all about. But is it really all that impossible? I think not.Let’s start with one of the easier things to deal with, namely the technology of so distant a future. There is a new and better approach that already has some precedent in the steampunk and retrofuturism movements, first glimpsed on film (that I know of) in “1984” (1984), in which the technology seen was not the mid-1980’s technology as it actually existed currently, but a reasonable projection of the future from what things were like in 1948 when George Orwell originally penned the novel. By 1984, real offices often had mainframe computers with (dumb) terminals in each office, and would email to transmit messages about, but in “1984” they are still using pneumatic tubes. It is as if someone with all the cinematography skills and techniques and experience we have today were to have existed back in 1948 and had been sufficiently funded to apply those skills as needed. With this approach, all of the technological anachronisms of Foundation cease to be a problem; we are simply telling the story as originally envisioned by the author, and as originally read by its first readers in it own original time. This could also be a good approach in connection with the men and women and how they relate to each other, no need to impose contemporary norms; anyway, Asimov has some truly good and strong female characters as written, albeit set in ways that seem out of sync with how people view things today. Just treat it like a period piece.Next, let’s look at how the problem of the moguls (and of funding) might also be solved, and best so “in the typewriter,” so to speak. The answer to this is largely staring us in the face already, namely the fact that so very much of the series is just people talking in rooms. How about simply forget trying to figure out portrayals of the things discussed and simply have the conversations as given in the series itself? That one thing alone would be a truly vast savings on production costs. Another big savings would be that for what few space battles are seen the technology that now exists has made the production of such scenes much easier and cheaper that it would have been in former years. CGI graphics today has come a long way, and even “last year’s technology” in that could still look quite excellent and sufficient for the needs of this series.People talking in rooms doesn’t sound very exciting, and hardly a basis for a movie, but then recall “My Dinner With Andre” (1981) which, despite being literally nothing but two guys having a conversation in a restaurant, actually manages to be quite captivating as a truly excellent film. Only, instead of discussing philosophies of life what we have here are power brokers discussing the direction the future should take, making all-important decisions, negotiations, and even outright takeovers. As Khan said (in the Star Trek episode, Space Seed), “It has been said that social occasions are only warfare concealed.” Or again, think of your average courtroom drama. What, after all, IS a “Courtroom Drama,” but “people talking in a room”? And for that matter, one early scene consists of Hari Seldon himself in some sort of actual “trial.” About 95% of the whole Foundation saga can properly be regarded as a “bottle show.” It is always the search for survival, as well as the truth about the Plan: How will Hari Seldon avoid having his group shut down by the Empire? How will the Foundation, now located on Terminus at the edge of the Galaxy, drive Anacreon from their soil? How can the Foundation religion be used to turn aside a subsequent attack from Anacreon? How will trade replace the religion as a much further means of expansion? How does the Foundation survive the last great attack of the declining old Empire? What recourse is there if history fails to unfold as planned? And so forth.Any film that rises even the tiniest bit above the mere shoot-em-up has to feature scenes of exposition, people talking and explaining what has been going on, or what scam the bad guy is trying to pull, or what the good guy is doing to fight it, or “whodunit?” and so forth. The Foundation series is almost pure exposition. So actually, it is mostly comprised of the most interesting part of most films. Where would Star Wars be without “No, Luke, I am your father”? All the swordplay that precedes and follows that iconic moment of exposition almost might as well be a mere arm-wrestle for all the interest it has in comparison.Science fiction writer and critic James Gunn said of the Foundation series, “Action and romance have little to do with the success of the Trilogy—virtually all the action takes place offstage, and the romance is almost invisible—but the stories provide a detective-story fascination with the permutations and reversals of ideas.” If any attempt to film Foundation is to prove credible, at the very least this detective-story fascination with permutations and reversals of ideas must feature at the center of it all. Yes, there can be room for some action or romance, but these things must take a back seat (if present at all). Think of Murder She Wrote, or Columbo, or Ellery Queen. It is not any (much) action or romance that drives the tale (though those things can enter in occasionally), but (in those cases) the seeking for the truth. This last of course points to something else about how to do it, namely as a television miniseries. Think of the different ways that a war is portrayed in films versus television shows: In a feature film one can have a “cast of thousands,” a veritable sea of soldiers fighting throughout a vast battlefield, but on television it makes far more sense to show merely a few single pairs of soldiers duking it out. Foundation is full of such “single pairs” and small groups “duking it out” with psychohistory, or with the mentalic powers of the Mule or of the Second Foundation.That leads to the last point, namely casting decisions. When making feature films one often tends to seek out known “name” talent, but in this case such “name” talent should only be permitted if their own interest in such a project would make them willing to accept a pay scale commensurate with that of new and (relatively) unknown and untried acting talent. It is amazing how people, especially those who understand how a future career in acting depends upon their performance here, can rise to the occasion in ways that surprise everyone including themselves. As for the lack of continuing characters throughout the series, even that need not be considered much of a problem. Making a series about, for example, the Bible, or even such a miniseries as Roots, certainly did not suffer from the lack of a single continuing character (unless you want to count God in the first case, or Racism (as like a “character”) in the second. And for that there is Psychohistory and the Seldon Plan.So, is it doable? Absolutely! Will it happen, and in a credible manner? Unfortunately those sorts of decisions extremely seldom fall to those capable of making them competently. Given enough time, almost anything, however unlikely, is practically bound to occur, eventually. Just don’t hold your breath waiting for it.ADDENDUM:Well, it looks like this could happen after all. Apple has greenlit a feasible effort which even includes Isaac Asimov's own daughter among the production staff. Perhaps previous attempts have failed due to attempts to compress such a vast saga into a single film instead of a series. For myself, I pictured a 4-part miniseries, each part (ranging from 90 to 120 minutes including credits) taking on about three "installments" per part:Part 1 (Founding the Foundation): The Psychohistorians, The Encyclopedists, The MayorsPart 2 (Facing the Empire): The Merchant Princes, The Traders, The General (I will get to the rationale for the order reversal, below)Part 3 (The Mule): The Mule (both parts, as published November and December 1945), Search by the MulePart 4 (The Two Foundations): Search by the Foundation (all three parts, as published November and December 1949 and January 1950)I had dreams of trying to write the screenplay myself (contract or no, just for my own interest), but that probably won't ever be realized, at least not in the immediately foreseeable future, but I do have some thoughts; they are truly mine, apart from their direct borrowing from Asimov's original work and also the existing stories authorized by the Asimov estate, and I offer them freely, hoping that other fans will pick up on these and say, "yes, these are good ideas" and hope the production will be positively influenced by them.One idea is to borrow a bit more from the original series as published in Astounding, which differs somewhat from the book versions. For example, the original published installment (now known as the Encyclopedists) had a short series of paragraphs portraying a meeting conducted by Hari Seldon which might be combined with the closing parts of the Psychohistorians, such that he says, not merely to Gaal Dornick one on one, but to his gathered Psychohistorians and Mathematicians at the close of the last meeting he is to preside at, "I am finished!"In that same vein of pointing to the original published stories, The Traders would be about an episode from the past life of Lathan Devers. It would be added after the part (in The General) that introduces Emperor Cleon II and Brodrig and before we return to Bel Riose and Ducem Barr. Sennet Forrell and his three cronies are again gathered, and Sennet is introducing his fellow members to this Trader who really is a real Trader (unlike the fake "Trader" Jaim Twer who was found out by Hober Mallow), loyal to the Foundation, a great spy, brilliantly clever, and extremely resourceful. To illustrate the point, the events of The Traders (or "The Wedge") are told as a backstory (in only 5-10 minutes of screen time - or 3-5 minutes if we are trying to squeeze it all into a one hour episode) so that audiences can better understand and appreciate who he is, and deepen his character with real Asimov Foundation material originally so intended.(For the books, it made sense to reverse the order of the two stories since to end the first volume on a relatively minor trading victory would have made a very weak ending for the book. The triumph of Hober Mallow and his successful navigation of a Seldon Crisis made for a strong and fitting climax to the first book. So the order was inverted, and as Lathan Devers could not have possibly lived long enough to precede Mallow and then yet still face the Empire, a new protagonist Limmar Ponyets was introduced, along with a few textual adjustments made to that story and Mallow's to make it seem as if their inverted order made sense. But as originally published, it was Lathan Devers who first sold nuclear gadgets to the Askonians, and that could be here reasonably restored. The only other alternative has been to omit The Traders altogether as does (for example) the BBC radio series production.)Now, Apple has greenlit a 10-part television series - how would that divvy up? What I had is effectively 12 parts, but with The Traders subsumed into The General, and the Search by the Foundation, originally published in three parts (but actually not quite as many words as the two parts of The Mule, anyway), could be reduced by producing it in two parts, which brings us down to 10.In point of fact, it appears that Dr. Asimov seems to have expected that his final Foundation novella would be cut into two parts as was his Mule novella, since there is what makes a great cliffhanger in the middle of the middle part, namely where young Arcadia, having just realized that Lady Callia is a Second Foundationer, has just been deposited in a vast and unfriendly space port. She sees signs lit up for ships going all sorts of places; one is even going to Terminus but she can only head-shake "no" openmouthed as she dare not go to the one place she most wishes to go. Doubtless the Second Foundation is setting a trap for her there. In blind fear and panic she spins, seemingly endlessly, in circles not knowing where to turn, where to go, who to trust (as in “a circle has no end”), and now realizing that she knows where the Second Foundation is, and that her life is forfeit should the Second Foundation capture her and learn of her guilty knowledge, she collapses in tears, feeling as lonely and frightened as an abandoned child, but with the weight of the entire future of Galactic civilization upon her shoulders. She looks up as if expecting some answer from a Deity, but all there is, is the camera looking down at her, pulling away as she gets smaller and as more and more of the surrounding crowd bustles around her, grey and altogether indifferent to her plight as the credits roll, until she seems to disappear, lost in the crowd.Narrator: Each segment should have as its narrator someone who is close to the events, but never the main character; Gaal Dornick makes a good narrator for The Psychohistorians, Yohan Lee for The Encyclopedists and The Mayors, Tinter (a lieutenant aboard Mallow's ship) and Ankor Jael (Mallow's trusted friend during his trial and the "War" with Korell), Ducem Barr for The General, Toran Darell (husband of Bayta) for The Mule, Hans Pritcher for Search by the Mule, Homir Munn and Mrs. Palver for Search by the Foundation. The bits of the Encyclopedia Galactica could be read by either the current narrator or by someone else (if someone else, then ideally Peter Jones or someone with a peter jonesey sort of voice as a sort of reference forward-back to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy would be ultra-cool).Second Foundation anonymity: To keep the Second Foundation figures anonymous in their meetings on their home planet (because their identity has to be concealed during their interactions with ordinary people in ordinary places), all sorts of unusual perspectives could be used. Obviously, no faces can be shown, but very small portions of the actor's face can be shown in extreme close-up: the raising of an eyebrow, the furrowing of a forehead, the crooking of a finger (along with several other hand and arm gestures), the jutting of a chin, the curling of part of a lip, the appearance of a dimple, also figures seen from behind, at a distance, or as black silhouettes against a wall chock full of brightly glowing math equations. Electronically deepen their voices to borderline unrecognizability and add that echo effect to indicate that we are not hearing words conventionally spoken but thoughts intimated to each other through the tiny gestures seen in the various close-ups. Or think of all the ways the faces of the doctors and nurses were cleverly concealed during the twilight episode “Eye of the Beholder” until the reveal at the end.Attention to details from the books could also add greatly despite their seeming insignificance, for example when hologram Seldon puts down his book it disappears, or when the dowagers wonder who Prince Regent Wienis is walking up the stairs to his private room arm-in-arm (Hardin) they lift ornate but actual and recognizable lorgnettes to their faces (I hate the way recent printings of the book just say that the dowagers just "stared after them" - blah!), or Onum Barr finding a box of canned goods (and his passport, returned) in a box on his doorstep after Hober Mallow leaves his planet of Siwenna, showing volumes about Mallow’s character in about ten seconds of screen time, or an actual descending grid of glowing energy squares three meters on a side descending upon the spaceport crowd where Preem Palver is waiting and then bribes an official. And many people in the original series smoke. I know that smoking is frowned on these days, but who is to say that a cancer-free tobacco couldn't be invented in the next 12-50 thousand years? Anyway, the scene where Ebling Mis is sitting on the desk of an intimidated Mayor Indbur, warning him about an upcoming Seldon crisis, definitely loses something if he can't also be blowing cigar smoke into the Mayor's face, and the poor Mayor trying not to cough as he doesn't smoke.Other things to bring in would be details from the synopses from Astounding, for example that the original "Warlord of Kalgan" whom the Mule displaces and later installs over the conquered Terminus was not some Kalganian native acquiring hawkish tendencies, but one of many Empire Generals-turned-Warlords of various regions:"Meanwhile, the old Empire has fallen quite to pieces, with the various splinters under the shifting, incoherent control of successions of warlords, whose ephemeral military rule waxes and wanes chaotically. It is to these warlords that certain elements of the Independent Traders look for help against the Foundation. However, none of these warlords are at all anxious to tangle with a Foundation known to have defeated the Empire singlehanded and known to be invincible by the established laws of psychohistory. There is only 'The Mule." ... As the story opens, he has just captured the planet of Kalgan without a fight, though its former warlord was known to be a capable warrior, entirely ungiven to surrender." And Bail Channis is a military man, though he does not wear his uniform while on his expedition with Hans Pritcher.Other details could flow from the other approved Foundation books by others; perhaps some details, especially regarding Linge Chen, and other background characters drawn from Foundation and Chaos by Greg Bear, could be incorporated into The Psychohistorians segment, or slight wear and tear, missing ceiling portions, litter in the streets not picked up, as indicated in Forward the Foundation, despite the still-otherwise gleaming planet-city of Trantor. Or in giving a history leading up to The Mule (in a short opening narrative admittedly not in the book) brief mention (and glimpse scenes) of the Fall of Trantor as conquered by Gilmer and the preservation of the Imperial Library by the students (omitting all mention of the Second Foundation however), as drawn from Harry Turtledove's "Trantor Falls" from Foundation's Friends.It might also not hurt (though it is not clear what effect it would have on the series, beyond what Hari Seldon's image is saying during the Mule crisis) to have some idea what the Seldon crisis for that time would have been if there were no Mule. Perhaps the Empire-General-turned-Warlord of Kalgan hopes, if he cannot destroy or conquer the Foundation, at least "make off" with its Traders or a signNow percentage of them, and perhaps through them some of their technology that they sell as well. (Originally he hoped to provoke a war between the two foundations, but scanning the furthest regions of the galaxy in vain searching for it he concludes that it is of no account and no help.) So he then turns to creating a civil war within the Foundation - perhaps he can set the Traders at war with the corrupt oligarchy that rules them from Terminus, and many Trader worlds would have joined him, but the few that didn't along with a surprising strength from the Terminus Oligarchy side who have at their beck and call the entire Foundation technology - which the Traders understand far too little of to be of much benefit to the Kalgan Warlord - and so he fails and better relations (something kind of like a union) forms among the Traders to strengthen their bargaining position against the Oligarchy who then begin dealing with them more honestly. But for those third and fourth Seldon crises the end has the Seldon image explaining the Crisis, but as the camera pans around (during the closing credits) no one is in the room.A carefully worked out chronology, specifying how many years into the Foundation era each story is, would be easy to give at the outset of each segment or after any major duration within a segment.Now, can anyone tell me that all of this would not add up to "utterly cool" if only it could be so produced?
-
What is the KVPY Exam? What is the syllabus for the KVPY exam for streams SA/SX/SB? How should one prepare for it? Could you sug
Refer to my answer to How do I study for KVPY? , although I,ve added a few new pointsThanks for the A2A.By looking at it question, I'm assuming that you don't take formal coaching for JEE or PMT. If you are in SA stream, then frankly it's going to be a bit difficult but certainly not impossible. I would advice you to start preparing from extra books as NCERT is not going to help you much.Firstly, don't panic. You can definitely clear it with flying colors if you are relaxed and set your mind towards your goals.Allot definite time for study say 3-4 hours for KVPY preparation.For physics, start strengthening your concepts. Use HC Verma or DC pandey. Since you don't have much time. I would advice you to do only MCQs.For chemistry, I would say read the topics thoroughly and try to finish most of the topic before mid Oct. Read only NCERT for inorganic chemistry. For physical, try doing as much as quality numerical you can.For maths, I would advice you to buy an additional book for practising good questions.Additional advices-Try giving as much as mock tests as possible once you have completed your syllabus and also in between regularly to check your status.In SA stream, some questions come which are in 12th syllabus. I would simply advice you to ignore them and focus on your 11tg syllabus.Divide your preparation time among all subjects.Analyse your mistakes in your mock tests and work on them.For biology, just revise your NCERT books of 9th and 10th. Apply your common sense.Practice previous years.Tips for the D-DayStart with the subject you are most comfortable with.Don't get overexcited if you find the paper easy and don't get depressed if you find the paper too tough.Read the questions very carefully. e.g length is sometimes given as 2l instead of l.Divide your time effectively among all subjects.Choose the subjects for the second part carefully.Thanks Feel free to ask more...
-
How do I promote my blog?
The possibilities are never ending. I say this because, one I wanted to market an e-commerce portal and I was able to traffic of 53,000 hits in 2 days. The technique I used was simple, I prized the website visit and created a competing game that force users to play – and, who don’t want to win, right? It worked! What I did was fairly simple – I advertised in Facebook, Email Advertised, SMS Advertised and word of mouth. That’s it. I'm not bragging about it - I'm only outlining that there are ways that are never discovered. It's all about trial and error. Some works and some don't. However,LIST OF PROMOTING WAYS COMMON TO MOST Social Networking – The Must Way. There are Facebook Profile.. LinkedIn Profile, Pulse, Groups, and much. Twitter profile. Pinterest Pinning. Tumblr Sharing. Quora. Blah! Blah! Search Engine Optimization – Content is the King. Write! Write! Write! But, write good and worthy content. Start with On-Page SEO and walk your path till Off-Page SEO. Social Bookmarking – Go Exclusive. Offer good stuff and start bookmarking with – Reddit, Live Journal, Stumble Upon, Slashdot, Delicious, and more. Advertise – Burn Dimes and Dollars. Promote to Google AdWords, AdSense, LinkedIn Ads, Facebook Ads, and more. Blogging – Again, content is the king. Start blog based on what you want to promote. Please search for content in Internet. Follow Article Submission with web productions like – Hub Pages, Article Base, Ezine Articles, and more. On top of that, getting published on Niche Blogs, Video Promotion on YouTube, dominating your marketing niche with affiliate, reseller, and associate programs, asking help (social engineering), and so forth. --------- These are methods, but promoting requires soamething else. Promoting has only one rule – go exclusive in Internet. If you’ve cash then you can promote on burning cash. If you’re out of budget, you need to have persistence and believe. Whichever path you follow, what matters is the Product, because Product and Marketing is equally important for traction. Marketing is all about signNowing out, and there are so many ways discovered and not discovered. But, the point is getting started – once started, we discover all domain expertise. It’s time that you start talking about your product! I write similar stuffs @ Twinkle IdeaLast Blog - Make Me a Slave Again
-
What is the best way to advertise blogs?
First things first...Free content is everywhere.Effective content is limited.Make sure your content rocks or else you will get nowhere! You don't have to cover something completely new. You just have to do a better job covering a topic than anyone else.If this has been ticked, then let’s talk strategy…1. Share on Social MediaMake sure you have a page on at least Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Social media is where most of the sharing will happen. If you create interesting content, that is eye-catch you will get your fair share of sharing.2. Build an email listStart building a list as from day one. Use tools such as MailChimp. It is free up to a certain amount of subscribers. Worry later about pricing. By having a list you will have ‘guaranteed’ traffic. Why? Once you post a blog post you will blast an email telling your fellow fans about your latest content. Also having a list will lead you to other promotional methods such as a referral program. What is referral marketing?3. Run a refer a friend contestTry to get a sponsor or else to fork an awesome reward for those who refer friends who are interested in your blog. If done correctly, this can grow your email list quite quickly!! Check out two methods I wrote about how to promote your blog: Gaetano Caruana's answer to What are the most effective ways to promote blogs? through referral marketing. Gaetano Caruana's answer to What are the best referral programs in market?4. Do OutsignNowWriting excellent content is not enough. You have to do the hard work of email influencers or people in your niche. Maybe they might mention you or quote your content. You have to signNow out to them and let them know about your blog, content and your way of writing about topics in the same niche.5. Create Link BaitsAs the name implies, try to get the interest of someone with an audience. This can be done by writing something about them, replying to a post, giving your view about a topic. Links will help you in various ways. It will help your SEO and get referred visitors.6. Answer Questions on QuoraQuora is a place to ask and answer questions. There is a reason why you are reading this post and why I am answering it. Build authority in your niche by answering questions.7. Groups on Facebook / LinkedInBe active in groups where your target audience meets up.8. Guest Post on Other BlogsTry to write on other blogs with an audience. Ask for permission. It might be a bit difficult in the beginning if you don't have an audience to swap back.9. Comment on Other BlogsBe active on other blogs. This way you will get noticed and you will start building your authorithy status.10. Participate in ForumsAnother place you can go offsite to promote your blog is forums. There are many forums where people congregate to talk about specific topics. Similar to blog commenting, by participating in the conversions and adding value, you can draw attention to yourself and your blog. Other participants may follow your profile link, or if it’s helpful, you can link directly to a blog post in one of your forum posts.
Trusted esignature solution— what our customers are saying
Get legally-binding signatures now!
Related searches to Install eSignature Presentation Myself
Frequently asked questions
How do i add an electronic signature to a word document?
How to make a pdf editable for esign?
How to esign a arden?
Get more for Install eSignature Presentation Myself
- How To Electronic signature Tennessee Plumbing Word
- How To Electronic signature Tennessee Plumbing Document
- Can I Electronic signature Tennessee Plumbing Word
- How Do I Electronic signature Tennessee Plumbing Word
- How Do I Electronic signature Tennessee Plumbing Document
- Help Me With Electronic signature Tennessee Plumbing Document
- Help Me With Electronic signature Tennessee Plumbing Word
- How Can I Electronic signature Tennessee Plumbing Document
Find out other Install eSignature Presentation Myself
- Tennessee cpa journal tennessee society of certified public form
- Jordan normal forms for a skew adjoint operator in the lorentzian math csusb
- Subject military personnel casualty matters policies and procedures form
- Oracle call center connectors oracle documentation form
- New mexico workers tower group companies form
- 1 new mexico cover letter york tpa doc form
- Table of contents common data set duquesne university section a section b section c section d section e section f section g form
- Style and citation manual form
- 0a technical specification mid crid version 6 ribbs usps form
- 1 2 3 4 5 before the board of registered nursing department of consumer affairs state of california 6 7 8 9 in the matter of form
- Vote oklahoma mock elections forms ok
- Criteria for certification and recertification of eye bank technicians restoresight form
- 1 3 the meaning of computer securityis there a security form
- University of pittsburgh fact book university of pittsburgh fact book table of contents general information mission statement
- Small business health insurance survey main street alliance form
- Printable application wounded warriors family support form
- An invoice is included with your order women39s international form
- Pancreatic stellate cells can form new like cells biochemical biochemj
- Euclidean quadratic forms are adc forms a short math uga
- Tennessee downtowns program tennessee main street form