Erase Electronic signature Document Later
Make the most out of your eSignature workflows with airSlate SignNow
Extensive suite of eSignature tools
Robust integration and API capabilities
Advanced security and compliance
Various collaboration tools
Enjoyable and stress-free signing experience
Extensive support
How To Remove eSignature Presentation
Keep your eSignature workflows on track
Our user reviews speak for themselves
Erase Electronic signature Document Later. Explore one of the most consumer-helpful exposure to airSlate SignNow. Deal with your complete file handling and discussing process digitally. Change from portable, paper-centered and erroneous workflows to automatic, electronic digital and faultless. You can actually make, supply and indicator any files on any product everywhere. Be sure that your crucial business cases don't slip overboard.
Find out how to Erase Electronic signature Document Later. Adhere to the simple guide to get started:
- Create your airSlate SignNow account in click throughs or log on with the Facebook or Google account.
- Benefit from the 30-day free trial version or pick a pricing program that's great for you.
- Locate any lawful web template, create on the internet fillable kinds and talk about them safely.
- Use sophisticated functions to Erase Electronic signature Document Later.
- Indicator, personalize signing get and gather in-individual signatures 10 times more quickly.
- Establish intelligent alerts and acquire notices at every phase.
Shifting your jobs into airSlate SignNow is simple. What follows is a straightforward approach to Erase Electronic signature Document Later, in addition to tips to maintain your fellow workers and companions for better partnership. Encourage your employees with all the finest equipment to be on the top of company operations. Boost output and scale your company more quickly.
How it works
Rate your experience
-
Best ROI. Our customers achieve an average 7x ROI within the first six months.
-
Scales with your use cases. From SMBs to mid-market, airSlate SignNow delivers results for businesses of all sizes.
-
Intuitive UI and API. Sign and send documents from your apps in minutes.
A smarter way to work: —how to industry sign banking integrate
FAQs
-
What likely happened to Kris Kremers and Lisanne Froon after getting lost in the Panamanian jungle?
My personal guess is that they were murdered. And that they had been dead since April 1st. The photos taken on April 8th was taken by the murderer to mislead the police. So was those cellphone signal checking and calling 112/911.April 1st morning: The two girls were enjoying their hike.Picture #505Picture #507Picture #508: Last “happy” “regular” picture the girls took.April 1st afternoon/evening: Girls went missing.April 1st-6th: Cellphone activities and signal checks, attempts to call the emergency but the cellphones has no signal.April 3rd: Search for the girls began.…(7 days after their disappearance.)…April 8th 1 am to 4 am: 90 photos taken in the dark by Lisanne’s Canon SX270. First was picture #510 (#509 missing/deleted).Some of the many night time pictures.April 11th: Last attempt of signal check on Kremers’ cellphone.My thought:1)Where did picture #509 went?That is the critical pictures between the last happy picture #508, and the first of the night time photos #510 seven days later.The investigators have noted that the girls didn’t delete any other pictures, except #509. So they do not know why they would delete #509, which in this situation would be very crucial to the investigation.Another interesting thing is that the #509 picture was totally deleted and cannot be restored. When a camera deletes a picture, usually it can be restored. It would take a PC computer to totally delete a picture. If so this would mean foul play.2) No goodbye messages.When people know that it is hopeless, and they will die, they would leave behind goodbye massages to love ones. This is done to let their love ones know that they love them, and to explain how they got themselves into the life threatening situation.They can write something down. And in this case, the girls could have made a goodbye video with their camera or cellphone. At the very least, they would have taken a goodbye picture of themselves on their camera or cellphone.The only reason the girls didn’t leave any goodbye message is that they weren’t able to. However given that “they” can take 90 photos on the 7th days after they disappeared, on April 8th, it shows that “they” easily could have left a goodbye message.And by “they”, perhaps I am no longer referring to the 2 girls, but their murderer.It takes only a few minutes to leave one goodbye video. “Mama, Papa, I love you!” Certainly by April 8th, it must come upon the girls that this might be it, and they should leave a goodbye message (if they were alive). They know they were in grave danger, and they were still strong enough to take 90 photos at night, so why didn’t they leave a goodbye message?3) Not a single picture of the girlsThe only picture we have is the back of the head of one of the girls at night. It was almost as if the girls don’t want their face to be seen at all. Why all the secrecy?That picture of one of the girls’ back of the head at night, unfortunately, does not prove that she was still alive. And if she was dead, why would the other girl take a picture of the back of her dead friend’s head?4) Who took those 90 night time photos on April 8th? Who was checking the cellphone signals and calling 112/911 between April 1st and 11th?Given the above, it seems unlikely that those pictures were taken by the 2 girls. Once again, why no goodbye messages then? Some people suspect it was an animal or monkey that took the pictures. But I say it was their murderer(s).The cellphone signal checking thing can easily be done by the murderer, to “pretend” that the girls were alive when they were already murdered. It is no rocket science. The murderer knew there was no signal in that location so the calls will never go through. That’s why the murderer was confident to call the police, because he knew he would not actually need to talk to the police. And the murdered did this for 6 days from April 1st to 6th, and then return one more time on April 11th.5) There were other murders in the area after these 2 girls.The area that they hiked in was not the safest place. There were other “unrelated” murders in the same area. Could be the cartel. Could be some tribes.Conclusion:The rainforest is a very dangerous place. These 2 girls could have died of natural cause easily. However in this case, being in a naturally dangerous location does not automatically mean it wasn’t a murder. There are evidence that indicates foul play. However even so, we might never catch the killer.
-
Why did you fire your attorney?
Bonnie Shields said she’ll ask for a permanent protection order for me after the deniable domestic assault of 10/11/13. She then dilly dallied…..Here’s my part of my complaint against her to the Attorney Regulation Board. Shields actually denied the deniable domestic assault every happened….. Despite my husband, Harlan Leigh Stein, confessing in the police report….When I fired her, she said she’d file a Motion to be Dismissed (you can’t fire an attorney, only the judge, who gets kickbacks and bribes can) but instead she requested a guardian ad litem to be appointed to me….By the way, attorneys are entirely unregulated. The Board actually twisted one of my questions to help Shields appear good…Lisa FrankelColorado Supreme Court Attorney Regulation Counsel1300 Broadway,Suite500Denver,CO80203RE: Reply to Bonnie Shields' Response, Case No. 14-1436Dear Mrs. Frankel,Bonnie Shields' libelous stories don't add up and stand in contradiction to documentation (which I've enclosed). She made them up when interviewed substitutes. Additionally, none of these stories and trigger words justify the Motion for GAL. Especially since Shields requested an urgent appointment in contradiction to Title 18. Lack of skill and due care are not a sufficient charge because she admits to having a BA in psychology. Shields is additionally guilty of consumer fraud by not disclosing a conflict of interest in handling her own dismissal from the court, in contradiction to the contract. For all of these reasons - liable, malpractice, misrepresentation, personal injury and fraud - I ask that the Attorney Regulation Board revoke her license.I've enclosed the telephone conference transcript of 3/10/14 (enclosed). GAL is appointed without a hearing. (excerpts) BA in psychology prevents Shields from alleging paranoid schizophrenia without looking at the mental evaluation from 2005. mental evaluation was from 2005 (transcript) but never asked me about the diagnosis. She was directly ordered to get the vocational review and refused. (trascript).I've successfully represented myself in court pro-se at the initial hearing, filed a response to the petition for dissolution of marriage pro-se, and represented myself in mediation and the telephone conference of 12/11/14 and scheduled Temporary Orders myself. (register of action minute order) Seven years in law school are not a requirement for citizens to keep their constitutional rights.Because of her BA in psychology, Shields would have been aware that by threatening me (to have to pay for falsely alleged damages to the house) she causes stresses that invalidate the mental evaluation as non-diagnostic. This would allow her to pursue the appointment of a GAL fraudulently. When she was substituted she got scared and engaged in liable.Shields cost me my safety, health, money, well being, fertility, support, and the pursuit of happiness. Please take the ultimate measures against Shields. I will pursue a civil law suit separately. It is worrisome that she even filed such a flimsy and wordy response full of irrelevant and made-up tales.The notoriety of attorneys makes me worry that the Attorney Regulation Board hasn't been as effective as DORA and I've consulted with our representatives.Shields should be found guilty of the following:Lack of skill and careMalpracticeConsumer fraudMisrepresentationLiableShields lies and engages in liable in each and every paragraph:Page 1I preferred court mediators because I didn't want referrals between attorneys and mediators. I hoped court mediators would be easier. I told the same to Shields.Is Shields being wordy and irrelevant in expectation of a mechanical acquittal? Because this lie doesn't justify the appointment of a GAL and stands in contradiction to any allegations of violence.Page 2Is Mrs. Shields trying to deny the assault? She never looked at the police report (see police report). The CD documenting fracture to my pelvis was on record with the DA since November (see register of action). And after showing lack of due care and skill, Shields still fails to justify appointment of a GAL. Citizens don't lose their right to represent themselves in court because they lie about injuries aren't deprived of their constitutional rights. Enclosed is an MRI report and a review by an occupational therapist.I tightly controlled our time together at $250 per hour. Only bare essential were discussed. Shields was not going to get pep-talks, she was going to get terminated. She did not disclose that attorneys handle their own dismissal, which is a conflict of interests and should have been disclosed. She did not disclose that she entered general representation nor explain the differences between types of representation.Shields never informed me of the mediation waver option and never showed me online forms. She lies.I never yelled or screamed at mediation or anywhere else. This is misrepresentation and liable, and yet doesn't justify the appointment of a GAL. I obviously raise my voice when I'm being taken advantage of by greedy and fraudulent attorneys. That doesn't justify a GAL.The mediator was, as Shields described him, a low class guy earning low wages. He asked me if I've ever been to mediation or if I'm being represented. When I answered "no" he misrepresented the law. When he discovered that I know the law, he looked at the books, as if to "discover" a mistake, but couldn't pull it through. He still wanted to feel important at mediation, and made any real negotiation nearly impossible by interrupting. I put up with him but he prevented successful negotiations.The story of erratic behavior doesn't add up. The billing reflects only one physical meeting and no telephone consultations. At the February 20th meeting I prepared Shields for civil protection hearing in one hour. The other 40 minutes she billed me could reflect the time I interviewed attorney Van Der Jagt for a substitution and Shields spent 40 minutes trying to avoid a civil law suit against her. All of the attorneys I interviewed could see right through her. Please revoke her license.The email record doesn't reflect any of her allegations, except the emails she composed herself in response to no questions by me. At $250 per hour I didn't respond but decided to continue without her representation. She violated the contract, prevented a successful substitution, created complications in the case, and deprived me of unbundled legal representation.Shields always had time on limited representation. When she got the $10,000, although she was supposed to file for a civil protection hearing in mid February but didn't meet me until the 20th, and although she still hadn't filed by March 3rd she nothing to prove that I yelled until she violated the contract and engaged in malpractice by filing the Motion for GAL. Not yelling at a vendor taking advantage of one isn't a prerequisite for enjoying constitutional rights. Shields makes no sense.There is no record of us meeting after the 20th. Her stories of violence aren't adding up. Shields would not have filed a Motion for GAL if a party was violent. She preys on innocent citizens only. She was only in fear of a malpractice law suit - which she simply made worse by not backing out right away. Any fear for her life, like she falsely alleges, would have prevented her from filing this fraudulent motion. She would have rightly filed a Notice of Withdrawal.Japha never alleged any personal dealings with me. He recycled the liable from Shields to falsely allude to "behaviors" "previously observed" by others - but never the people he was communicating with. Motions enclosed. Wolf can't attest to anything except that I sent him emails asking him to leave the case. He filed redundant motions and prevented a dismissal. I didn't flatter him. He charged me $60-$70 per email and called it harassment. Emails and billing enclosed. No one has ever seen erratic behaviors. It is all liable. And it originates in Shields' fear of a civil law suit.Bonnie Shields uselessly misuses trigger words. The Rabbi is a mover and shaker and fast on the synagogue till. She represents 1400 referrals ofBoulder's richest. In February Shields told me that she and the Petitioner/Offender and the Rabbi are of the same age. Maybe she was asking for permission to accept an invitation. She became evasive after entering general representation.At Temporary Orders Shields said that if the Rabbi showed up in court, Shields could remove her by making her a witness. She could then prevent testimony through time management.When a lower earning spouse interviews a divorce attorney they remain silent, intending to create a money-making scheme with the other party's attorney. I went to the self-help center, got referrals to statutes, read them and then interviewed Shields and others. I told them I'm aware of my legal entitlements. Most said they are the wrong attorney for me. Shields said she'd pursue my legal entitlements. She proceeded to prepare me for pro-se representation. She can't justify the Motion for GAL. All she has is frivolous stories that add up to nothing. She may not be interested in losing business or her license over fraud and malpractice, but the Attorney Regulation Board should only be concerned with the consumers.Interestingly, Shields knew I have an understanding of court proceedings than, and always. Her emails are falsely misconstrued and do not respond to any questions by me.On February 20th Shields said that she and my husband and the Rabbi are the same age. She may have been telling me that she accepted an invitation for February 28th. Her communication skills were sharp on limited representation but became muddled once she got the $10,000. Any invitation from the Rabbi would include remuneration such as food, music, etc. With the legalization and "moralization" of Marijuana, the Rabbi would have experienced a relief in her seizures. Men who she had been romantically involved with would have become interested in her for a more substantial relationship. Shields took a side - supporting the new couple for their incomes and their connections. A GAL would have misrepresented the domestic assault and signed an unfair mediation that would have left most of my in the marital estate in the hands of Shields and others. This may have been discussed at the February 28th meeting. For all I know, Judge Arkin may have authorized Shields to file the Motion for GAL at that time. Judge Moss has done all in her power not to be involved. Ms. Frankel is advised to follow he example. Please revoke Shield's license. I will request the same for Wolf when its time to respond to his flimsy excuses.Judge Arkin may have the same disposition as Shields, but it isn't her job to use abusive discrimination so I might have to handle this through appeals. Wolf may have joined in to side with Arkin. Shields will be sued for all expenses related to an appeal.After entering general representation without disclosure and before Temporary Orders, if I mentioned my adjustment disorder to Shields in connection to Permanent Orders she would tell me not to mention it or the judge will declare me crazy. I'm not crazy and I have already met the Judge. Judge Moss impressed me as an intelligent and enlightened person obligated by statutes created by thoughtful representatives. It made no sense to me that she would have the power or will to declare me crazy.At Temporary Orders I did mention my mental disability in preparation to Permanent Orders. Shields appeared scared as she made the leap and obliterated the civil protection order from the electronic record. Judge Moss took it upon herself to fortify the electronic record and protect the constitution.Shields can't accept these incentive and represent my interests. That is why she composed these fraudulent emails and intended to file for a GAL. She hoped to find something in the medical records to misuse, but couldn't. All she can do is tell stories about how she didn't think I walked right, or how she doesn't think my husband intended to take the Rabbi's eggs, etc. There is nothing she can say to justify the Motion for GAL. She engaged in liable as soon as she realized that she's being substituted.Wolf was also careful not to leave his post before he can guide the next person. I am trying to avoid general representation until I vacate the GAL either through district or appeals court.DORA should immediately begin a study of consumer fraud by attorneys. Regardless of how many attorneys participate in the same lie, it only indicates that they are responding to the same financial opportunities to abuse the law. This is how innocent people end up in prison.Meanwhile I will personally educate the public about the pitfalls of consumer fraud available to attorneys and get a momentum for revision of the court system.Page 3I told Shields that one of my disks is triangular instead of the rectangular. I said I didn't remember the technical term for that injury. She said my tailbone was broken and I repeated that to the court.I noticed that Shields didn't mention litigation fees for civil protection. Based on the DA, I believed that a civil protection order was certain and that the Offender will offer protection without the expenses of a hearing. The Magistrate may have understood better: (Temporary Orders page 71 lines 3-8) "THE COURT: ... You know, The Court took judicial notice of its own filing including case 13M1767 which is the domestic violence case, so I know that that case exists and I know there, there is a domestic violence alleged and that the Respondent in that, in this case is the protected party in, in that case. The court found her testimony credible..."Temporary Orders transcript, Page 70 line 21- Page 71 line 3 "THE COURT: ...file that motion for vocation evaluation... which I think you should, do it yesterday, or tomorrow, if you know what I mean." Shields nodded and agreed. I kept waiting for the order but Shields refused. It was a reason to terminate her services.In December Shields said she'd file for protection in mid February, right after Temporary Orders. She maliciously intended to enter general representation and then prevent dismissal through common consumer fraud and misuse of the judicial system."Conspiracy" is another trigger word. As a real estate broker I understand networking.Page 4"Under the influence" - another trigger word falsely used that doesn't prove the need for GAL. As the customer I decide on who to hire, how to negotiate and how to proceed. Shields wanted to waste time to increase expenses. She was upset because it would have gotten her fired.Shields knew that my permanent disability of 75% was fromIsraelin 2005, before I came to theUnited States. She didn't ask about the diagnosis or any records to perpetuate her fraud. Interesting, her BA in psychology. (Temporary Orders transcript)I read the statutes before I first interviewed Shields and others. I learned about them in the self help center. Other attorneys refused to give information or said they're unsuitable. Shield's strategy was to avoid the waver, prepare the spreadsheet for me to use in mediation pro-se, get a signature to appear at Temporary Orders and then gobble up as much of the retainer as possible while I try to terminate services. Divorce attorneys depend on each other to hide malpractice, maximize earnings without working, and prevent dismissal. DORA should assume regulation immediately and the judicial system needs revision.What does my marriage have to do with a GAL? I asked Petitioner/Offender whether he was planning to rig me with one of Rabbi Deborah Bronstein's eggs. Their affair was public. She has epilepsy and may not be able to carry a pregnancy. She might have had some frozen. I was fertile and only needed hormones and a turkey baster. Petitioner/Offender insisted on IVFs that had no chance of success as well as egg donations. He and his brothers are violent womanizers who maneuver multiple women. They torture their daughters into manic depression.One sister in law had broken teeth when I met her. Later she had broken ribs. I don't knowIllinoislaw, but wonder whether an appeal would have gotten her into safety and away from attorney fraud. I wonder whether attorneys have deprived her of safety and other legal entitlements through malpractice. She, of course, is in no position to talk for her safety.I planned to get a sperm donor as soon as I got the Petition for Dissolution. Petitioner/Offender said I should wait until after the divorce. He was going to offer a settlement so this was only going to take a couple of months. Because of the domestic assault, the back injury, and because of the GAL fraud scheme that prevented me from getting biopsy and treatment for suspected cancer, I'm prevented from using this last year of fertility to get pregnant. I take several weeks to recover from biopsy. This is a possible symptom of small lymphatic cancer. To keep the house, get details of the fraud scheme and to discover the process of appeals I had to stay active, drive around and make calls. I've enclosed a CT scan report and a doctor's letter.Page 5I'm the one who scheduled the hearing for 1/27/14. Shields prepared me for self representation. Attached is the minute order. I represented myself at the initial hearing and filed a response to the petition for dissolution of marriage pro-se. (See register of Action.) Shields used my meticulous accounting as a property manager and read my leases. I compose the addendums myself. She can't justify her motion and telephone conference.Bonnie Shields was not hired to "think" but to represent. This is how the constitution of theUnited Statesworks. As I said, Shields tried to talk about her "relationship" with the Rabbi on February 20th, although she didn't know about the Rabbi when she was still unbundled.Bonnie Shields did not disclose different types of representation. She did not disclose her ability to file ex-parte filings. She did not disclose that she will keep herself on my record against my will. She didn't disclose entering representation at all. These constitute consumer fraud. Please revoke her license.Page 6I called Shields' office at 8am to follow up on my letter to terminate services from 3/1/14 (enclosed). I was told to call at 10am. When I called Shields said she'd file a Notice of Withdrawal within 15 minutes. I left for court immediately. The register of action states that she filed her Motions at 3pm (enclosed). I didn't see her letter until I was back - and it is a lie. When exactly does she allege violence took place? She caused a strike against my restraining order and prevented successful substitution and continued litigation. Judge Moss tried to get the case back on track but Wolf was violating my right to be heard and was engaged in malpractice.Shields would not have preyed on a dangerous person.Invitations from the Rabbi would include attractions and remunerations (food, music, etc.) My husband is a sociopathic charmer. Shields looked like she was swept off her feet. She was out of her league.Japha has never stated that he personally had any bad interactions with me. He falsely alleged that others did based on Shield's liable. (enclosed)When I interviewed attorney Van Der Jagt, Shields spent 40 minutes falsely trashing me and he could see right through her. The same happened with all of the other attorneys I interviewed. She knew the GAL was a mistake and that she was being substituted. She didn't want her malpractice to be discovered. Wolf should have immediately entered substitution but instead pursued the GAL fraud scheme through negligent misrepresetnation.My experience with these attorneys has been that they will misuse and misconstrue whatever they can. But if they don't have materials to work with, they will flatly lie and invent things.The liable from Shields affected the secretary in division 4 and even an advocate at the crisis center. Other effects of the liable are to be estimated as I proceed.Mrs. Shields did not send the entire remainder of the retainer to Wolf and kept the difference. She made convenient accounting mistakes, counting a balance as a debt. She overcharged me $400 for a meeting that took only one hour. She stalled on the civil protection order so shouldn't charge me for any of it. Petitioner paid for the first snow plowing directly. But he stopped payments, while Shields charged to process receipts and correspondence. I dispute those charges. I got numerous copies of each correspondence. Is Shields trying to pretend she performed more work that she did? Is she trying to hide the email in which I ask her to desist from fraud? She charged me for those but never desisted. Charges will be disputed.Regarding the 3/10/14 telephone conversation, the transcript is enclosed. Shields lies, can't explain what better decisions she needs to help me make, as I was successful until her fraud scheme. She requests an urgent process without a hearing. Title 18 states that no GAL be appointed without medical records. Shields knows she can have a GAL appointed, prevent me from legal representation, prevent her dismissal, dismiss the mental evaluation because of the threats that create stressors, and have the GAL appoint her back and request unlimited budgets.I counted on Wolf to vacate the GAL. Magistrate Moss said I'd be heard but Wolf prevented it through malpractice. Wolf only referred to "previous considerations by the court." The only consideration was the unexamined allegations by Shields. Shields is fully responsible for the appointment of a GAL. (Enclose the status report)Page 7It wasn't "months later" that the court appointed the GAL. I was instantly deprived of the right for unbundled services, and all that Wolf needed to do was waste time until it was time for Shield's motion to be ruled on. He created a lack of representation, misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation, and in contradiction to the constitution prevented me from being heard. This was appealable, which is another time consuming complication I will take against Shields in civil litigation. Judge Moss saw me represent myself successfully in her court and wasn't sure what to do because of two consecutive cases of unconstitutional misrepresentation. The case kept shifting between divisions 7 and 4. Judge Arkin never met me, she was clueless, and was bound up by Moss's decision of 4/11/14 not to allow me self representation. Everything that is going on in court today is nothing but a technical complication that originated in Shield's initial decision to engage in malpractice. Meanwhile, I'm prevented from legal representation because there is a GAL, or an attorney, on my record. I will aspire to have DORA make general representation illegal as it is unconstitutional and not in line with capitalism.At this point the appeals court is waiting for a FINAL decision regarding the GAL. Not understanding court procedures is not an option anymore. Paranoid schizophrenia is not an option anymore. On 6/17/14 Judge Arkin put an end to the "lets trash Sigal" orgy by attorneys that Shield's fuels out of fear for civil law suit.I didn't retain Wolf to "assess the issue". Shields is being ridiculous. He promised to vacate the GAL and pursue a civil protection hearing. He was hired urgently to substitute Shields but once he had the signature and the Motion for GAL all he needed was some manipulative malpractice to get more money. This is consumer fraud at the least. Once he sends his answers I'll get the clarity with which I can justly request that his license be nicked for more.Shields should really read the Constitution sometimes. The way the United States Constitution works, each party gets to represent its own interests. Shields doesn't seem to have a grasp of this fact. That she would share it with others is worrisome. The judicial system needs to be revised. It is not there to serve the financial interests of Bonnie Shields but to serve the people.If an attorney can promise to pursue vacating the GAL and civil protection in order to be retained and then pursue the exact opposite, DORA needs to assume regulation. Wolf never disclosed this and his license should be revoked for consumer fraud. Meanwhile Shields should lose her license for liable and malpractice.An "Authorization to enter representation" standardized form signed by parties is required. It should state the attorney's understanding of the case before retainer and the intended litigation. Parties should get referrals to statutes at the self-help center and judges will be in a position to assess consumer fraud. If attorneys are not in a position to pursue the party's interest as per the constitution then they must withdraw.It is against theUnited Statesconstitution that attorneys represent whatever image of "justice" they can misconstrue through malpractice. For the Constitution to be upheld, each party must pursue its own interests in court. DORA must reorganize the attorney profession and judicial procedures need to be revised to reflect the same.I wrote consumer reviews. Shields counted on Wolf to fraudulently scare me into deleting them through misrepresentation. She gave me 5 days to erase them. I simply ignored her. Her email is enclosed to show the relationship between the two.Bonnie Shields told me herself that she was neighbors with Judge Arkin at our first meeting. Before retainer attorneys will be silent but avoid lies because the party can assess their statements. After entering general representation they are free to lie, prevent the party from legal advice and from communicating with the court, and keep themselves on record.Shields knew of a collection of rare bourbon bottles. I've had to remove it since then. The attorneys threatened to give the Offender keys to the marital home and have him enter when I'm gone. Petitioner/Offender regularly offers bottles to friends. I let Shields know that any bottles she gets will be permanently marked for identification. (letters from wolf)Weaver's police has always supported me based on evidence. They didn't believe any of the liable. One deputy suggested I could have neighbors testify that there isn't damage to the marital home to counter the false allegations by my attorneys. They got special training from advocates as to how I was prevented from a civil protection hearing by the judicial system.Page 84/11/14 the court denied Mr. Wolfs motion to withdraw because Bonnie Shields prevented me of my constitutional right for limited representation through malpractice. He allegations were never examined. The decision was made on 3/10/14. (lines) Minute order is enclosed. Wolf and Japha invited mistakes and the Judge Arkin completely lost track of what is happening.Substitution was not going to work as long as the Motion for GAL was on record. It allows attorneys to not work and control their own earnings while Shields take the bulk of risk of malpractice and censure of license. The financial incentive is too big.5/9/14 I believe that the public should be educated regarding the consumer traps of general representation. The judicial system should be revised to protect the constitution.I am an ambassador with Community Association Institute. In 2011 the meetings were crowded with homeowners helpless in the face of embezzlement and every bsignNow of statute and rule. Self-regulating HOA managers were only obligated to follow board direction and to "know" the governing documents. Boards were hiring HOA managers who exempted them from HOA fees and authorized embezzlement schemes. Homeowners who wanted financial disclosure suffered liable, intimidation and even racial slurs. Annual meeting and elections were regularly cancelled and boards nominated themselves. HOA managers didn't need to work or maintain properties, but only to cater to the boards exclusively.When I joined Community Association Institute DORA was already conducting a research. Now that DORA is assuming regulation homeowners are satisfied and Community Association Institute is offering valuable property management classes that were previously irrelevant to HOA mangers.I quit my job as an HOA manager and became a real estate broker because real estate brokers are DORA regulated and try to keep on their best behaviors.5/28/14 - Rose Zapor used common exploitation techniques that were never going to work ("You will soon find that I'm your only friend and no one else.") When she realized I had testimonies regarding no damage to the house, Roze Zapor misrepresented that I refuse to participate in hearings although I always called the secretary of division 7 asking to be included. She later stated that I've been previously removed from the court. That is also false. It could be liable from Shields. So between Shields and Zapor one should lose their license or both. Following my appeal I was included in a telephone conversation on 6/17/14. Now that I was heard, Zapor withdrew. I worry about her elderly victims.Rose Zapor ordered a flimsy 1.5 hour mental evaluation from an unsuitable doctor. Bonnie Shields and Robert Wolf created stressors that make any mental evaluation dismissable. An 8 hour hearing was scheduled around the useless evaluation although I'm deprived of legal representation. This is a scam.I asked the judge to take a 12 hour complete, current and valid evaluation. I asked her to stay the case for 6 months for an admissible evaluation.The Petitioner/Offender pleaded that I was not going to engage in mental evaluation "fully or meaningfully." ( attach motion ) This is word jugglery, as mental evaluation also examines the way a person participates. The Petitioner/Offender is extremely capable. Fighting him was going to be hard. Shields armed him with everything he needed, although the statutes are clear and the law is on my side. This will be the subject of a malpractice law suit.I sent Shield an itemized demand letter. I'm additionally requesting the entire $8,600 back. I will also file for personal injury, liable and malpractice. I'm waiting to estimate total damages regarding litigation, health, finances, well being, the bourbon collection, storage, etc.Page 8 - Response1. Shields didn't advise me of a mediation waver. She lies.2. Shields prepared me for self-representation at the telephone conference of 12/11/14. I scheduled Temporary Orders myself.3. Is Shields bragging about a few services rendered right at $250 per hour unbundled? Seven years of law school are not a prerequisite for citizens to enjoy their constitutional rights or to avoid the appointment of a GAL. She fails to show need for a GAL.4. Shields told she should have scheduled the vocational report "yesterday".5. At Temporary Orders David Japha demonstrated to the court that I'm financially capable, that I can hire vendors as a property manager and supervise them, that I can calculate profits in my head, that I can hire vendors and accomplish goals, that I'm not delusional (Petitioner was asked to testify), that I can concentrate on studies, that I'm a real estate broker with a limited authority to practice law. This renders all of Shield's arguments void and null. She can't justify either the Motion for GAL or the urgent procedure.6. Enforcement of Temporary Orders is being addressed, following Wolf's attempts to financially exhaust me.7. I only filed for a restraining order because Shields said she'd file a Notice of Withdrawal within 15 minutes. This is consumer fraud and malpractice. Zapor did the same by suggesting that I file for a restraining order in division 4. She was looking for excuses why she needed to retain an attorney in general representation after Wolf. But like I said, if attorneys are short of circumstances which they can twist and misrepresent, they simply invent them.8. What is the value of talking to a member of the ethics committee if Shields engages in misrepresentation and financial fraud? Whatever advice they gave is irrelevant or relies on the fact that attorneys aren't regulated, they want to make decisions without refering to police and medical records, and they pursue unjust enrichment, exhausting households, putting people through pain and suffering and avoiding consequences. Shields did not disclose Colorado Constitution Section 25 or Section 6. DORA should require that.9. I have the transcript from 3/10/14. The Geneva Convention is mentioned in page _ line -. My behavior was natural for any citizen who is taken advantage of by an attorney. Shields did not disclose that being "nice" to a manipulative and greedy attorney is a prerequisite for citizens to keep their legal entitlements. Court rules should be revised, but Shields should have a responsibility not to abuse them. Attorneys should be regulated, but Shields should have the responsibility not to exploit parties.Under what authority does Shields signNow that culture did not influence her decision? Again, She can't justify a GAL or an urgent appointment.10. Shields falsely kept nearly $2,900 in extra fees. All disputed.Page 9 - Responses to Questions1. I was not advised of the mediation waver.2. At court Shields confirmed that she'll order the vocational review and that she should have already done so.3. Question 3 was misrepresented. Shields rejected the stipulation ("mutual protection"). correctly while unbundled. Wolf presented it again falsely claiming he composed it. He can't possibly misconstrue this as representing my interest, at least not without relying on liable from Shields. But then he should admit consumer fraud in the promises he made in order to get retained.4. Shields acted out of greed, malice and corruption.5. Shields lied to the magistrate and engaged in liable. She told the magistrate that I think the magistrate takes bribes, which at the time I had no reason to believe. This is harmful liable. She said I yelled about civil protection order which is another lie. Her safety concerns are all fraud.6. I did not formally retain Mrs. Shields. She asked to be paid for her time in court in advance and gave me a contract stating the services my money gives me. This is consumer fraud.In conclusion - Bonnie Shields could not have engaged in anything but fraud, misrepresentation and malpractice when she filed her motion. None of her lies justify the Motion for GAL or the urgent appointment.To the extent that the attorneys can justify their behaviors, DORA should assume regulation.Reply to The ExhibitsNone of my emails attached justify a Motion for GAL, especially deprived of a hearing.Exhibit : The emails were fraudulently composed, and not in response to any questions. At $250 per hour I didn't respond but attempted termination of servicesExhibit: I didn't receive the letter until coming back from court. On the phone she misrepresented that she will file a Notice within 15, after 10am.The court appointed the GAL solely based on Shields' unexamined allegations. Wolf only referred to "previous decisions by the court," namely, the 3/10/14 decision to have him represent me . Arkin is clueless and I've been deprived of legal representation. The appeal was denied because a final decision wasn't made yet. A civil attorney told me there is no recourse but to wait for a final decision and appeal it. Shields has created a real problem by exploiting a serious consumer trap that needs to be revised.I will eventually get DORA to regulate attorneys and the judicial system revised. It is historically unprecedented that attorneys don't exploit parties, but so was the end of slavery.Writing to the Attorney Regulation Board is like writing Santa. You imagine there is somebody in your corner and that there is somebody in charge. It is an illusion. But it takes so long to process these complaints that by the time it is rejected you are past your initial grief.
Trusted esignature solution— what our customers are saying
Get legally-binding signatures now!
Related searches to Erase Electronic signature Document Later
Frequently asked questions
How do i add an electronic signature to a word document?
How to create an electronic signature in paint?
How to fucking sign a w9 pdf?
Get more for Erase Electronic signature Document Later
- Can I Electronic signature Louisiana Sports Word
- How To Electronic signature Louisiana Sports PDF
- How Do I Electronic signature Louisiana Sports PDF
- Help Me With Electronic signature Louisiana Sports PDF
- How Can I Electronic signature Louisiana Sports PDF
- Can I Electronic signature Louisiana Sports PDF
- How To Electronic signature Louisiana Sports Word
- How Do I Electronic signature Louisiana Sports Word
Find out other Erase Electronic signature Document Later
- Police clearance challan form
- Nj home improvement contractor license reinstatement form
- Da form 2171
- Trade record sheet form
- Sf 1164 fillable pdf form
- Sallie mae budget worksheet form
- Earth by cynthia sherwood answer key form
- Scrapie tags form
- Base titanium online application form
- Exsultet short form pdf
- Uf health doctors note form
- Merchant navy form pdf 363703149
- Borang pa 1 13 form
- Power pole warranty form
- Texas child support agreement template form
- Oregon temporary tattoo license form
- Remax referral form 41036041
- Bcbs fl prior authorization form pdf 238638730
- Indiana university plagiarism test certificate answers quizlet form
- Ime oriented form