Erase Electronic signature Document Myself
Make the most out of your eSignature workflows with airSlate SignNow
Extensive suite of eSignature tools
Robust integration and API capabilities
Advanced security and compliance
Various collaboration tools
Enjoyable and stress-free signing experience
Extensive support
How To Remove eSignature Presentation
Keep your eSignature workflows on track
Our user reviews speak for themselves
Erase Electronic signature Document Myself. Explore by far the most end user-friendly experience with airSlate SignNow. Control your complete document digesting and discussing system electronically. Range from hand-held, document-dependent and erroneous workflows to automated, computerized and flawless. You can actually produce, deliver and sign any files on any product anywhere. Be sure that your important business instances don't slide overboard.
Discover how to Erase Electronic signature Document Myself. Follow the straightforward guide to start:
- Build your airSlate SignNow accounts in clicks or sign in with your Facebook or Google accounts.
- Take pleasure in the 30-day time free trial or select a rates strategy that's perfect for you.
- Get any lawful template, create on the web fillable varieties and discuss them tightly.
- Use advanced functions to Erase Electronic signature Document Myself.
- Indication, individualize signing purchase and accumulate in-particular person signatures ten times speedier.
- Establish auto reminders and acquire notices at each stage.
Relocating your tasks into airSlate SignNow is easy. What comes after is a simple approach to Erase Electronic signature Document Myself, as well as tips to keep your colleagues and companions for better cooperation. Empower your staff with all the very best instruments to stay along with company operations. Increase productiveness and scale your small business quicker.
How it works
Rate your experience
-
Best ROI. Our customers achieve an average 7x ROI within the first six months.
-
Scales with your use cases. From SMBs to mid-market, airSlate SignNow delivers results for businesses of all sizes.
-
Intuitive UI and API. Sign and send documents from your apps in minutes.
A smarter way to work: —how to industry sign banking integrate
FAQs
-
What is big data and how do I learn about it?
What is big data and how do I learn about it?Big Data is defined by the three V’s:Volume—large amounts of data;Variety—the data comes in different forms, including traditional databases, images, documents, and complex records;Velocity—the content of the data is constantly changing through the absorption of complementary data collections, the introduction of previously archived data or legacy collections, and from streamed data arriving from multiple sources.It is important to distinguish Big Data from “lots of data” or “massive data.” In a Big Data Resource, all three V’s must apply. It is the size, complexity, and restlessness of Big Data resources that account for the methods by which these resources are designed, operated, and analyzed.The term “lots of data” is often applied to enormous collections of simple-format records. For example every observed star, its magnitude and its location; the name and cell phone number of every person living in the United States; and the contents of the Web.These very large datasets are sometimes just glorified lists. Some “lots of data” collections are spreadsheets (2-dimensional tables of columns and rows), so large that we may never see where they end.Big Data resources are not equivalent to large spreadsheets, and a Big Data resource is never analyzed in its totality. Big Data analysis is a multi-step process whereby data is extracted, filtered, and transformed, with analysis often proceeding in a piecemeal, sometimes recursive, fashion. As you read this book, you will find that the gulf between “lots of data” and Big Data is profound; the two subjects can seldom be discussed productively within the same venue.Big Data Versus Small DataActually, the main function of Big Science is to generate massive amounts of reliable and easily accessible data... Insight, understanding, and scientific progress are generally achieved by ‘small science.’Big Data is not small data that has become bloated to the point that it can no longer fit on a spreadsheet, nor is it a database that happens to be very large. Nonetheless, some professionals who customarily work with relatively small data sets, harbor the false impression that they can apply their spreadsheet and database know-how directly to Big Data resources without attaining new skills or adjusting to new analytic paradigms.As they see things, when the data gets bigger, only the computer must adjust (by getting faster, acquiring more volatile memory, and increasing its storage capabilities); Big Data poses no special problems that a supercomputer could not solve. More information please refer to the Office 2019 Guide.This attitude, which seems to be prevalent among database managers, programmers, and statisticians, is highly counterproductive. It will lead to slow and ineffective software, huge investment losses, bad analyses, and the production of useless and irreversibly defective Big Data resources.Let us look at a few of the general differences that can help distinguish Big Data and small data. – Goals small data—Usually designed to answer a specific question or serve a particular goal. Big Data—Usually designed with a goal in mind, but the goal is flexible and the questions posed are protean.Here is a short, imaginary funding announcement for Big Data grants designed “to combine high-quality data from fisheries, coast guard, commercial shipping, and coastal management agencies for a growing data collection that can be used to support a variety of governmental and commercial management studies in the Lower Peninsula.”In this fictitious case, there is a vague goal, but it is obvious that there really is no way to completely specify what the Big Data resource will contain, how the various types of data held in the resource will be organized, connected to other data resources, or usefully analyzed. Nobody can specify, with any degree of confidence, the ultimate destiny of any Big Data project; it usually comes as a surprise.– Locationsmall data—Typically, contained within one institution, often on one computer, sometimes in one file.Big Data—Spread throughout electronic space and typically parceled onto multiple Internet servers, located anywhere on earth.– Data structure and content small data—Ordinarily contains highly structured data. The data domain is restricted to a single discipline or sub-discipline. The data often comes in the form of uniform records in an ordered spreadsheet.PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF BIG DATABig Data—Must be capable of absorbing unstructured data (e.g., such as free-text documents, images, motion pictures, sound recordings, physical objects). The subject matter of the resource may cross multiple disciplines, and the individual data objects in the resource may link to data contained in other, seemingly unrelated, Big Data resources.– Data preparationsmall data—In many cases, the data user prepares her own data, for her own purposes. Big Data—The data comes from many diverse sources, and it is prepared by many people. The people who use the data are seldom the people who have prepared the data.– Longevitysmall data—When the data project ends, the data is kept for a limited time (seldom longer than 7 years, the traditional academic life-span for research data); and then discarded.Big Data—Big Data projects typically contain data that must be stored in perpetuity. Ideally, the data stored in a Big Data resource will be absorbed into other data resources. Many Big Data projects extend into the future and the past (e.g., legacy data), accruing data prospectively and retrospectively.– Measurementssmall data—Typically, the data is measured using one experimental protocol, and the data can be represented using one set of standard units.Big Data—Many different types of data are delivered in many different electronic formats. Measurements, when present, may be obtained by many different protocols. Verifying the quality of Big Data is one of the most difficult tasks for data managers. [Glossary Data Quality Act]– Reproducibilitysmall data—Projects are typically reproducible. If there is some question about the quality of the data, the reproducibility of the data, or the validity of the conclusions drawn from the data, the entire project can be repeated, yielding a new data set.Big Data—Replication of a Big Data project is seldom feasible. In general, the most that anyone can hope for is that bad data in a Big Data resource will be found and flagged as such.– Stakessmall data—Project costs are limited. Laboratories and institutions can usually recover from the occasional small data failure.Big Data—Big Data projects can be obscenely expensive. A failed Big Data effort can lead to bankruptcy, institutional collapse, mass firings, and the sudden disintegration of all the data held in the resource. As an example, a United States National Institutes of Health Big Data project known as the “NCI cancer biomedical informatics grid” cost at least $350 million for fiscal years 2004–10.An ad hoc committee reviewing the resource found that despite the intense efforts of hundreds of cancer researchers and information specialists, it had accomplished so little and at so great an expense that a project moratorium was called.Soon thereafter, the resource was terminated. Though the costs of failure can be high, in terms of money, time, and labor, Big Data failures may have some redeeming value. Each failed effort lives on as intellectual remnants consumed by the next Big Data effort.– Introspectionsmall data—Individual data points are identified by their row and column location within a spreadsheet or database table. If you know the row and column headers, you can find and specify all of the data points contained within.Big Data—Unless the Big Data resource is exceptionally well designed, the contents and organization of the resource can be inscrutable, even to the data managers. Complete access to data, information about the data values, and information about the organization of the data are achieved through a technique herein referred to as introspection.– Analysissmall data—In most instances, all of the data contained in the data project can be analyzed together, and all at once.Big Data—With few exceptions, such as those conducted on supercomputers or in parallel on multiple computers, Big Data is ordinarily analyzed in incremental steps. The data are extracted, reviewed, reduced, normalized, transformed, visualized, interpreted, and re-analyzed using a collection of specialized methods.Whence Comest Big Data?Often, the impetus for Big Data is entirely ad hoc. Companies and agencies are forced to store and retrieve huge amounts of collected data (whether they want to or not). Generally, Big Data comes into existence through any of several different mechanisms:– An entity has collected a lot of data in the course of its normal activities and seeks to organize the data so that materials can be retrieved, as needed.The Big Data effort is intended to streamline the regular activities of the entity. In this case, the data is just waiting to be used. The entity is not looking to discover anything or to do anything new. It simply wants to use the data to accomplish what it has always been doing;only better. The typical medical center is a good example of an “accidental” Big Data resource. The day-to-day activities of caring for patients and recording data into hospital information systems results in terabytes of collected data, in forms such as laboratory reports, pharmacy orders, clinical encounters, and billing data.Most of this information is generated for one-time specific use (e.g., supporting a clinical decision, collecting payments for a procedure). It occurs to the administrative staff that the collected data can be used, in its totality, to achieve mandated goals: improving the quality of service, increasing staff efficiency, and reducing operational costs.– An entity has collected a lot of data in the course of its normal activities and decides that there are many new activities that could be supported by their data.Consider modern corporations; these entities do not restrict themselves to one manufacturing process or one target audience. They are constantly looking for new opportunities.Their collected data may enable them to develop new products based on the preferences of their loyal customers, to signNow new markets, or to market and distribute items via the Web. These entities will become hybrid Big Data/manufacturing enterprises.– An entity plans a business model based on a Big Data resource.Unlike the previous examples, this entity starts with Big Data and adds a physical component secondarily. Amazon and FedEx may fall into this category, as they began with a plan for providing a data-intense service (e.g., the Amazon Web catalog and the FedEx package tracking system).The traditional tasks of warehousing, inventory, pick-up, and delivery had been available all along but lacked the novelty and efficiency afforded by Big Data.– An entity is part of a group of entities that have large data resources, all of whom understand that it would be to their mutual advantage to federate their data resources.An example of a federated Big Data resource would be hospital databases that share electronic medical health records.– An entity with skills and vision develops a project wherein large amounts of data are collected and organized, to the benefit of themselves and their user-clients.An example would be a massive online library service, such as the U.S. National Library of Medicine’s PubMed catalog, or the Google Books collection.– An entity has no data and has no particular expertise in Big Data technologies, but it has money and vision.The entity seeks to fund and coordinate a group of data creators and data holders, who will build a Big Data resource that can be used by others. Government agencies have been the major benefactors. These Big Data projects are justified if they lead to important discoveries that could not be attained at a lesser cost with smaller data resources.The Most Common Purpose of Big Data Is to Produce Small DataIf I had known what it would be like to have it all, I might have been willing to settle for less.Imagine using a restaurant locater on your smartphone. With a few taps, it lists the Italian restaurants located within a 10-block radius of your current location.The database being queried is big and complex (a map database, a collection of all the restaurants in the world, their longitudes and latitudes, their street addresses, and a set of ratings provided by patrons, updated continuously), but the data that it yields is small (e.g., five restaurants, marked on a street map, with pop-ups indicating their exact address, telephone number, and ratings). Your task comes down to selecting one restaurant from among the five, and dining thereat.In this example, your data selection was drawn from a large data set, but your ultimate analysis was confined to a small data set (i.e., five restaurants meeting your search criteria). The purpose of the Big Data resource was to proffer the small data set. No analytic work was performed on the Big Data resource; just search and retrieval.The real labor of the Big Data resource involved collecting and organizing complex data so that the resource would be ready for your query. Along the way, the data creators had many decisions to make (e.g., Should bars be counted as restaurants? What about takeaway only shops? What data should be collected? How should missing data be handled? How will data be kept current?Big Data is seldom if ever, analyzed in toto. There is almost always a drastic filtering process that reduces Big Data into smaller data. This rule applies to scientific analyses. The Australian Square Kilometre Array of radio telescopes [8], WorldWide Telescope, CERN’s Large Hadron Collider and the Pan-STARRS (Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System) array of telescopes produce petabytes of data every day. Researchers use these raw data sources to produce much smaller data sets for analysis [9].Here is an example showing how workable subsets of data are prepared from Big Data resources. Blazars are rare super-massive black holes that release jets of energy that move at near-light speeds. Cosmologists want to know as much as they can about these strange objects. A first step to studying blazars is to locate as many of these objects as possible.Afterward, various measurements on all of the collected blazars can be compared, and their general characteristics can be determined. Blazars seem to have a gamma ray signature that is not present in other celestial objects. The WISE survey collected infrared data on the entire observable universe.Researchers extracted from the Wise data every celestial body associated with an infrared signature in the gamma-ray range that was suggestive of blazars; about 300 objects. Further research on these 300 objects led the researchers to believe that about half were blazars [10]. This is how Big Data research often works; by constructing small data sets that can be productively analyzed.Because a common role of Big Data is to produce small data, a question that data managers must ask themselves is: “Have I prepared my Big Data resource in a manner that helps it become a useful source of small data?”Big Data Sits at the Center of the Research UniverseIn the past, scientists followed a well-trodden path toward truth: hypothesis, then experiment, then data, then analysis, then publication. The manner in which a scientist analyzed his or her data was crucial because other scientists would not have access to the same data and could not re-analyze the data for themselves.Basically, the results and conclusions described in the manuscript was the scientific product. The primary data upon which the results and conclusion were based (other than one or two summarizing tables) were not made available for review. Scientific knowledge was built on trust. Customarily, the data would be held for 7 years, and then discarded.In the Big data paradigm, the concept of a final manuscript has little meaning. Big Data resources are permanent, and the data within the resource is immutable. Any scientist’s analysis of the data does not need to be the final word; another scientist can access and re-analyze the same data over and over again.Original conclusions can be validated or discredited. New conclusions can be developed. The centerpiece of science has moved from the manuscript, whose conclusions are tentative until validated, to the Big Data resource, whose data will be tapped repeatedly to validate old manuscripts and spawn new manuscripts.Today, hundreds or thousands of individuals might contribute to a Big Data resource. The data in the resource might inspire dozens of major scientific projects, hundreds of manuscripts, thousands of analytic efforts, and millions or billions of search and retrieval operations. The Big Data resource has become the central, massive object around which universities, research laboratories, corporations, and federal agencies orbit.These orbiting objects draw information from the Big Data resource, and they use the information to support analytic studies and to publish manuscripts. Because Big Data resources are permanent, any analysis can be critically examined using the same set of data, or re-analyzed anytime in the future. Because Big Data resources are constantly growing forward in time (i.e., accruing new information) and backward in time (i.e., absorbing legacy data sets), the value of the data is constantly increasing.Big Data resources are the stars of the modern information universe. All matter in the physical universe comes from heavy elements created inside stars, from lighter elements.All data in the informational universe is complex data built from simple data. Just as stars can exhaust themselves, explode, or even collapse under their own weight to become black holes; Big Data resources can lose funding and die, release their contents and burst into nothingness, or collapse under their own weight, sucking everything around them into a dark void. It is an interesting metaphor.GlossaryBig Data resource A Big Data collection that is accessible for analysis. Readers should understand that there are collections of Big Data (i.e., data sources that are large, complex, and actively growing) that are not designed to support analysis; hence, not Big Data resources.Such Big Data collections might include some of the older hospital information systems, which were designed to deliver individual patient records upon request; but could not support projects wherein all of the data contained in all of the records were opened for selection and analysis. Aside from privacy and security issues, opening a hospital information system to these kinds of analyses would place enormous computational stress on the systems (i.e., produce system crashes).In the late 1990s and the early 2000s, data warehousing was popular. Large organizations would collect all of the digital information created within their institutions, and these data were stored as Big Data collections, called data warehouses. If an authorized person within the institution needed some specific set of information (e.g., emails sent or received in February 2003; all of the bills paid in November 1999), it could be found somewhere within the warehouse.For the most part, these data warehouses were not true Big Data resources because they were not organized to support a full analysis of all of the contained data. Another type of Big Data collection that may or may not be considered a Big Data resource are compilations of scientific data that are accessible for analysis by private concerns, but closed for analysis by the public.In this case, a scientist may make a discovery based on her analysis of a private Big Data collection, but the research data is not open for critical review. In the opinion of some scientists, including myself, if the results of data analysis are not available for review, then the analysis is illegitimate. Of course, this opinion is not universally shared, and Big Data professionals hold various definitions for a Big Data resource.ConclusionsConclusions are the interpretations made by studying the results of an experiment or a set of observations. The term “results” should never be used interchangeably with the term “conclusions.” Remember, results are verified. Conclusions are validated.Data Quality Act In the United States the data upon which public policy is based must have quality and must be available for review by the public. Simply put, public policy must be based on verifiable data. The Data Quality Act of 2002 requires the Office of Management and Budget to develop government-wide standards for data quality.Data manager This book uses “data manager” as a catchall term, without attaching any specific meaning to the name. Depending on the institutional and cultural milieu, synonyms and plesionyms (i.e., near-synonyms) for data manager would include technical lead, team liaison, data quality manager, chief curator, chief of operations, project manager, group supervisor, and so on.Data resource A collection of data made available for data retrieval. The data can be distributed over servers located anywhere on earth or in space. The resource can be static (i.e., having a fixed set of data), or in flux. Pseudonyms for data resource is a data warehouse, data repository, data archive, and data store.Database A software application designed specifically to create and retrieve large numbers of data records (e.g., millions or billions). The data records of a database are persistent, meaning that the application can be turned off, then on, and all the collected data will be available to the user.Grid A collection of computers and computer resources (typically networked servers) that are coordinated to provide the desired functionality. In the most advanced Grid computing architecture, requests can be broken into computational tasks that are processed in parallel on multiple computers and transparently (from the client’s perspective) assembled and returned. The Grid is the intellectual predecessor of Cloud computing. Cloud computing is less physically and administratively restricted than Grid computing.ImmutabilityImmutability is the principle that data collected in a Big Data resource is permanent and can never be modified. At first thought, it would seem that immutability is a ridiculous and impossible constraint. In the real world, mistakes are made, information changes, and the methods for describing information changes. This is all true, but the astute Big Data manager knows how to accrue informa-tion into data objects without changing the pre-existing data.IntrospectionWell-designed Big Data resources support introspection, a method whereby data objects within the resource can be interrogated to yield their properties, values, and class membership. Through introspection, the relationships among the data objects in the Big Data resource can be examined and the structure of the resource can be determined. Introspection is the method by which a data user can find everything there is to know about a Big Data resource without downloading the complete resource.Large Hadron Collider The Large Hadron Collider is the world’s largest and most powerful particle accelerator and is expected to produce about 15 petabytes (15 million gigabytes) of data annually.Legacy data Data collected by an information system that has been replaced by a newer system, and which cannot be immediately integrated into the newer system’s database. For example, hospitals regularly replace their hospital information systems with new systems that promise greater efficiencies, expanded services, or improved interoperability with other information systems. In many cases, the new system cannot readily integrate the data collected from the older system.The previously collected data becomes a legacy to the new system. In such cases, legacy data is simply “stored” for some arbitrary period of time in case someone actually needs to retrieve any of the legacy data.After a decade or so the hospital may find itself without any staff members who are capable of locating the storage site of the legacy data, or moving the data into a modern operating system, or interpreting the stored data, or retrieving appropriate data records, or producing a usable query output.MapReduceA method by which computationally intensive problems can be processed on multiple computers, in parallel. The method can be divided into a mapping step and a reducing step.In the mapping step, a master computer divides a problem into smaller problems that are distributed to other computers. In the reducing step, the master computer collects the output from the other computers. Although MapReduce is intended for Big Data resources and can hold petabytes of data, most Big Data problems do not require MapReduce.Missing data Most complex data sets have missing data values. Somewhere along the line data elements were not entered, records were lost, or some systemic error produced empty data fields. Big Data, being large, complex, and composed of data objects collected from diverse sources, is almost certain to have missing data.Various mathematical approaches to missing data have been developed; commonly involving assigning values on a statistical basis; so-called imputation methods. The underlying assumption for such methods is that missing data arise at random. When missing data arises non-randomly, there is no satisfactory statistical fix.The Big Data curator must track down the source of the errors and somehow rectify the situation. In either case, the issue of missing data introduces a potential bias and it is crucial to fully document the method by which missing data is handled. In the realm of clinical trials, only a minority of data analyses bothers to describe their chosen method for handling missing data.MutabilityMutability refers to the ability to alter the data held in a data object or to change the identity of a data object. Serious Big Data is not mutable. Data can be added, but data cannot be erased or altered. Big Data resources that are mutable cannot establish a sensible data identification system, and cannot support verification and validation activities.The legitimate ways in which we can record the changes that occur in unique data objects (e.g., humans) over time, without ever changing the key/value data attached to the unique object.For programmers, it is important to distinguish data mutability from object mutability, as it applies in Python and other object-oriented programming languages. Python has two immutable objects: strings and tuples.Intuitively, we would probably guess that the contents of a string object cannot be changed, and the contents of a tuple object cannot be changed. This is not the case. Immutability, for programmers, means that there are no methods available to the object by which the contents of the object can be altered.Specifically, a Python tuple object would have no methods it could call to change its own contents. However, a tuple may contain a list, and lists are mutable. For example, a list may have an append method that will add an item to the list object. You can change the contents of a list contained in a tuple object without violating the tuple’s immutability.Parallel computing Some computational tasks can be broken down and distributed to other computers, to be calculated “in parallel.” The method of parallel programming allows a collection of desktop computers to complete intensive calculations of the sort that would ordinarily require the aid of a super-computer.Parallel programming has been studied as a practical way to deal with the higher computational demands brought by Big Data. Although there are many important problems that require parallel computing, the vast majority of Big Data analyses can be easily accomplished with a single, off-the-shelf personal computer.Protocol A set of instructions, policies, or fully described procedures for accomplishing a service, operation, or task. Protocols are fundamental to Big Data. Data is generated and collected according to protocols. There are protocols for conducting experiments, and there are protocols for measuring the results.There are protocols for choosing the human subjects included in a clinical trial, and there are protocols for interacting with the human subjects during the course of the trial. All network communications are conducted via protocols; the Internet operates under a protocol (TCP-IP, Transmission Control Protocol-Internet Protocol).Query The term “query” usually refers to a request, sent to a database, for information (e.g., Web pages, documents, lines of text, images) that matches a provided word or phrase (i.e., the query term). More generally a query is a parameter or set of parameters that are submitted as input to a computer program that searches a data collection for items that match or bear some relationship to the query parameters.In the context of Big Data, the user may need to find classes of objects that have properties relevant to a particular area of interest. In this case, the query is basically introspective, and the output may yield metadata describing individual objects, classes of objects, or the relationships among objects that share particular properties.For example, “weight” may be a property, and this property may fall into the domain of several different classes of data objects. The user might want to know the names of the classes of objects that have the “weight” property and the numbers of object instances in each class.Eventually, the user might want to select several of these classes (e.g., including dogs and cats, but excluding microwave ovens) along with the data object instances whose weights fall within a specified range (e.g., 20–30 pound). This approach to querying could work with any data set that has been well specified with metadata, but it is particularly important when using Big Data resources.Raw data Raw data is the unprocessed, original data measurement, coming straight from the instrument to the database with no intervening interference or modification. In reality, scientists seldom, if ever, work with raw data.When an instrument registers the amount of fluorescence emitted by a hybridization spot on a gene array, or the concentration of sodium in the blood, or virtually any of the measurement that we receive as numeric quantities, the output is produced by an algorithm executed by the measurement instrument.Pre-processing of data is commonplace in the universe of Big Data, and data managers should not labor under the false impression that the data received is “raw,” simply because the data has not been modified by the person who submits the data.Results The term “results” is often confused with the term “conclusions.” Interchanging the two concepts is a source of confusion among data scientists. In the strictest sense, “results” consist of the full set of experimental data collected by measurements. In practice, “results” are provided as a small subset of data distilled from the raw, original data.In a typical journal article, selected data subsets are packaged as a chart or graph that emphasizes some point of interest. Hence, the term “results” may refer, erroneously, to subsets of the original data, or to visual graphics intended to summarize the original data. Conclusions are the inferences drawn from the results. Results are verified; conclusions are validated.Science, Of course, there are many different definitions of science, and inquisitive students should be encouraged to find a conceptualization of science that suits their own intellectual development. For me, science is all about finding general relationships among objects.In the so-called physical sciences the most important relationships are expressed as mathematical equations (e.g., the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration; the relationship between voltage, current, and resistance). In the so-called natural sciences, relationships are often expressed through classifications (e.g., the classification of living organisms).Scientific advancement is the discovery of new relationships or the discovery of a generalization that applies to objects hitherto confined within disparate scientific realms (e.g., evolutionary theory arising from observations of organisms and geologic strata). Engineering would be the area of science wherein scientific relationships are exploited to build new technology.Square Kilometer Array The Square Kilometer Array is designed to collect data from millions of connected radio telescopes and is expected to produce more than one exabyte (1 billion gigabytes) every day.
-
Why did you fire your attorney?
Bonnie Shields said she’ll ask for a permanent protection order for me after the deniable domestic assault of 10/11/13. She then dilly dallied…..Here’s my part of my complaint against her to the Attorney Regulation Board. Shields actually denied the deniable domestic assault every happened….. Despite my husband, Harlan Leigh Stein, confessing in the police report….When I fired her, she said she’d file a Motion to be Dismissed (you can’t fire an attorney, only the judge, who gets kickbacks and bribes can) but instead she requested a guardian ad litem to be appointed to me….By the way, attorneys are entirely unregulated. The Board actually twisted one of my questions to help Shields appear good…Lisa FrankelColorado Supreme Court Attorney Regulation Counsel1300 Broadway,Suite500Denver,CO80203RE: Reply to Bonnie Shields' Response, Case No. 14-1436Dear Mrs. Frankel,Bonnie Shields' libelous stories don't add up and stand in contradiction to documentation (which I've enclosed). She made them up when interviewed substitutes. Additionally, none of these stories and trigger words justify the Motion for GAL. Especially since Shields requested an urgent appointment in contradiction to Title 18. Lack of skill and due care are not a sufficient charge because she admits to having a BA in psychology. Shields is additionally guilty of consumer fraud by not disclosing a conflict of interest in handling her own dismissal from the court, in contradiction to the contract. For all of these reasons - liable, malpractice, misrepresentation, personal injury and fraud - I ask that the Attorney Regulation Board revoke her license.I've enclosed the telephone conference transcript of 3/10/14 (enclosed). GAL is appointed without a hearing. (excerpts) BA in psychology prevents Shields from alleging paranoid schizophrenia without looking at the mental evaluation from 2005. mental evaluation was from 2005 (transcript) but never asked me about the diagnosis. She was directly ordered to get the vocational review and refused. (trascript).I've successfully represented myself in court pro-se at the initial hearing, filed a response to the petition for dissolution of marriage pro-se, and represented myself in mediation and the telephone conference of 12/11/14 and scheduled Temporary Orders myself. (register of action minute order) Seven years in law school are not a requirement for citizens to keep their constitutional rights.Because of her BA in psychology, Shields would have been aware that by threatening me (to have to pay for falsely alleged damages to the house) she causes stresses that invalidate the mental evaluation as non-diagnostic. This would allow her to pursue the appointment of a GAL fraudulently. When she was substituted she got scared and engaged in liable.Shields cost me my safety, health, money, well being, fertility, support, and the pursuit of happiness. Please take the ultimate measures against Shields. I will pursue a civil law suit separately. It is worrisome that she even filed such a flimsy and wordy response full of irrelevant and made-up tales.The notoriety of attorneys makes me worry that the Attorney Regulation Board hasn't been as effective as DORA and I've consulted with our representatives.Shields should be found guilty of the following:Lack of skill and careMalpracticeConsumer fraudMisrepresentationLiableShields lies and engages in liable in each and every paragraph:Page 1I preferred court mediators because I didn't want referrals between attorneys and mediators. I hoped court mediators would be easier. I told the same to Shields.Is Shields being wordy and irrelevant in expectation of a mechanical acquittal? Because this lie doesn't justify the appointment of a GAL and stands in contradiction to any allegations of violence.Page 2Is Mrs. Shields trying to deny the assault? She never looked at the police report (see police report). The CD documenting fracture to my pelvis was on record with the DA since November (see register of action). And after showing lack of due care and skill, Shields still fails to justify appointment of a GAL. Citizens don't lose their right to represent themselves in court because they lie about injuries aren't deprived of their constitutional rights. Enclosed is an MRI report and a review by an occupational therapist.I tightly controlled our time together at $250 per hour. Only bare essential were discussed. Shields was not going to get pep-talks, she was going to get terminated. She did not disclose that attorneys handle their own dismissal, which is a conflict of interests and should have been disclosed. She did not disclose that she entered general representation nor explain the differences between types of representation.Shields never informed me of the mediation waver option and never showed me online forms. She lies.I never yelled or screamed at mediation or anywhere else. This is misrepresentation and liable, and yet doesn't justify the appointment of a GAL. I obviously raise my voice when I'm being taken advantage of by greedy and fraudulent attorneys. That doesn't justify a GAL.The mediator was, as Shields described him, a low class guy earning low wages. He asked me if I've ever been to mediation or if I'm being represented. When I answered "no" he misrepresented the law. When he discovered that I know the law, he looked at the books, as if to "discover" a mistake, but couldn't pull it through. He still wanted to feel important at mediation, and made any real negotiation nearly impossible by interrupting. I put up with him but he prevented successful negotiations.The story of erratic behavior doesn't add up. The billing reflects only one physical meeting and no telephone consultations. At the February 20th meeting I prepared Shields for civil protection hearing in one hour. The other 40 minutes she billed me could reflect the time I interviewed attorney Van Der Jagt for a substitution and Shields spent 40 minutes trying to avoid a civil law suit against her. All of the attorneys I interviewed could see right through her. Please revoke her license.The email record doesn't reflect any of her allegations, except the emails she composed herself in response to no questions by me. At $250 per hour I didn't respond but decided to continue without her representation. She violated the contract, prevented a successful substitution, created complications in the case, and deprived me of unbundled legal representation.Shields always had time on limited representation. When she got the $10,000, although she was supposed to file for a civil protection hearing in mid February but didn't meet me until the 20th, and although she still hadn't filed by March 3rd she nothing to prove that I yelled until she violated the contract and engaged in malpractice by filing the Motion for GAL. Not yelling at a vendor taking advantage of one isn't a prerequisite for enjoying constitutional rights. Shields makes no sense.There is no record of us meeting after the 20th. Her stories of violence aren't adding up. Shields would not have filed a Motion for GAL if a party was violent. She preys on innocent citizens only. She was only in fear of a malpractice law suit - which she simply made worse by not backing out right away. Any fear for her life, like she falsely alleges, would have prevented her from filing this fraudulent motion. She would have rightly filed a Notice of Withdrawal.Japha never alleged any personal dealings with me. He recycled the liable from Shields to falsely allude to "behaviors" "previously observed" by others - but never the people he was communicating with. Motions enclosed. Wolf can't attest to anything except that I sent him emails asking him to leave the case. He filed redundant motions and prevented a dismissal. I didn't flatter him. He charged me $60-$70 per email and called it harassment. Emails and billing enclosed. No one has ever seen erratic behaviors. It is all liable. And it originates in Shields' fear of a civil law suit.Bonnie Shields uselessly misuses trigger words. The Rabbi is a mover and shaker and fast on the synagogue till. She represents 1400 referrals ofBoulder's richest. In February Shields told me that she and the Petitioner/Offender and the Rabbi are of the same age. Maybe she was asking for permission to accept an invitation. She became evasive after entering general representation.At Temporary Orders Shields said that if the Rabbi showed up in court, Shields could remove her by making her a witness. She could then prevent testimony through time management.When a lower earning spouse interviews a divorce attorney they remain silent, intending to create a money-making scheme with the other party's attorney. I went to the self-help center, got referrals to statutes, read them and then interviewed Shields and others. I told them I'm aware of my legal entitlements. Most said they are the wrong attorney for me. Shields said she'd pursue my legal entitlements. She proceeded to prepare me for pro-se representation. She can't justify the Motion for GAL. All she has is frivolous stories that add up to nothing. She may not be interested in losing business or her license over fraud and malpractice, but the Attorney Regulation Board should only be concerned with the consumers.Interestingly, Shields knew I have an understanding of court proceedings than, and always. Her emails are falsely misconstrued and do not respond to any questions by me.On February 20th Shields said that she and my husband and the Rabbi are the same age. She may have been telling me that she accepted an invitation for February 28th. Her communication skills were sharp on limited representation but became muddled once she got the $10,000. Any invitation from the Rabbi would include remuneration such as food, music, etc. With the legalization and "moralization" of Marijuana, the Rabbi would have experienced a relief in her seizures. Men who she had been romantically involved with would have become interested in her for a more substantial relationship. Shields took a side - supporting the new couple for their incomes and their connections. A GAL would have misrepresented the domestic assault and signed an unfair mediation that would have left most of my in the marital estate in the hands of Shields and others. This may have been discussed at the February 28th meeting. For all I know, Judge Arkin may have authorized Shields to file the Motion for GAL at that time. Judge Moss has done all in her power not to be involved. Ms. Frankel is advised to follow he example. Please revoke Shield's license. I will request the same for Wolf when its time to respond to his flimsy excuses.Judge Arkin may have the same disposition as Shields, but it isn't her job to use abusive discrimination so I might have to handle this through appeals. Wolf may have joined in to side with Arkin. Shields will be sued for all expenses related to an appeal.After entering general representation without disclosure and before Temporary Orders, if I mentioned my adjustment disorder to Shields in connection to Permanent Orders she would tell me not to mention it or the judge will declare me crazy. I'm not crazy and I have already met the Judge. Judge Moss impressed me as an intelligent and enlightened person obligated by statutes created by thoughtful representatives. It made no sense to me that she would have the power or will to declare me crazy.At Temporary Orders I did mention my mental disability in preparation to Permanent Orders. Shields appeared scared as she made the leap and obliterated the civil protection order from the electronic record. Judge Moss took it upon herself to fortify the electronic record and protect the constitution.Shields can't accept these incentive and represent my interests. That is why she composed these fraudulent emails and intended to file for a GAL. She hoped to find something in the medical records to misuse, but couldn't. All she can do is tell stories about how she didn't think I walked right, or how she doesn't think my husband intended to take the Rabbi's eggs, etc. There is nothing she can say to justify the Motion for GAL. She engaged in liable as soon as she realized that she's being substituted.Wolf was also careful not to leave his post before he can guide the next person. I am trying to avoid general representation until I vacate the GAL either through district or appeals court.DORA should immediately begin a study of consumer fraud by attorneys. Regardless of how many attorneys participate in the same lie, it only indicates that they are responding to the same financial opportunities to abuse the law. This is how innocent people end up in prison.Meanwhile I will personally educate the public about the pitfalls of consumer fraud available to attorneys and get a momentum for revision of the court system.Page 3I told Shields that one of my disks is triangular instead of the rectangular. I said I didn't remember the technical term for that injury. She said my tailbone was broken and I repeated that to the court.I noticed that Shields didn't mention litigation fees for civil protection. Based on the DA, I believed that a civil protection order was certain and that the Offender will offer protection without the expenses of a hearing. The Magistrate may have understood better: (Temporary Orders page 71 lines 3-8) "THE COURT: ... You know, The Court took judicial notice of its own filing including case 13M1767 which is the domestic violence case, so I know that that case exists and I know there, there is a domestic violence alleged and that the Respondent in that, in this case is the protected party in, in that case. The court found her testimony credible..."Temporary Orders transcript, Page 70 line 21- Page 71 line 3 "THE COURT: ...file that motion for vocation evaluation... which I think you should, do it yesterday, or tomorrow, if you know what I mean." Shields nodded and agreed. I kept waiting for the order but Shields refused. It was a reason to terminate her services.In December Shields said she'd file for protection in mid February, right after Temporary Orders. She maliciously intended to enter general representation and then prevent dismissal through common consumer fraud and misuse of the judicial system."Conspiracy" is another trigger word. As a real estate broker I understand networking.Page 4"Under the influence" - another trigger word falsely used that doesn't prove the need for GAL. As the customer I decide on who to hire, how to negotiate and how to proceed. Shields wanted to waste time to increase expenses. She was upset because it would have gotten her fired.Shields knew that my permanent disability of 75% was fromIsraelin 2005, before I came to theUnited States. She didn't ask about the diagnosis or any records to perpetuate her fraud. Interesting, her BA in psychology. (Temporary Orders transcript)I read the statutes before I first interviewed Shields and others. I learned about them in the self help center. Other attorneys refused to give information or said they're unsuitable. Shield's strategy was to avoid the waver, prepare the spreadsheet for me to use in mediation pro-se, get a signature to appear at Temporary Orders and then gobble up as much of the retainer as possible while I try to terminate services. Divorce attorneys depend on each other to hide malpractice, maximize earnings without working, and prevent dismissal. DORA should assume regulation immediately and the judicial system needs revision.What does my marriage have to do with a GAL? I asked Petitioner/Offender whether he was planning to rig me with one of Rabbi Deborah Bronstein's eggs. Their affair was public. She has epilepsy and may not be able to carry a pregnancy. She might have had some frozen. I was fertile and only needed hormones and a turkey baster. Petitioner/Offender insisted on IVFs that had no chance of success as well as egg donations. He and his brothers are violent womanizers who maneuver multiple women. They torture their daughters into manic depression.One sister in law had broken teeth when I met her. Later she had broken ribs. I don't knowIllinoislaw, but wonder whether an appeal would have gotten her into safety and away from attorney fraud. I wonder whether attorneys have deprived her of safety and other legal entitlements through malpractice. She, of course, is in no position to talk for her safety.I planned to get a sperm donor as soon as I got the Petition for Dissolution. Petitioner/Offender said I should wait until after the divorce. He was going to offer a settlement so this was only going to take a couple of months. Because of the domestic assault, the back injury, and because of the GAL fraud scheme that prevented me from getting biopsy and treatment for suspected cancer, I'm prevented from using this last year of fertility to get pregnant. I take several weeks to recover from biopsy. This is a possible symptom of small lymphatic cancer. To keep the house, get details of the fraud scheme and to discover the process of appeals I had to stay active, drive around and make calls. I've enclosed a CT scan report and a doctor's letter.Page 5I'm the one who scheduled the hearing for 1/27/14. Shields prepared me for self representation. Attached is the minute order. I represented myself at the initial hearing and filed a response to the petition for dissolution of marriage pro-se. (See register of Action.) Shields used my meticulous accounting as a property manager and read my leases. I compose the addendums myself. She can't justify her motion and telephone conference.Bonnie Shields was not hired to "think" but to represent. This is how the constitution of theUnited Statesworks. As I said, Shields tried to talk about her "relationship" with the Rabbi on February 20th, although she didn't know about the Rabbi when she was still unbundled.Bonnie Shields did not disclose different types of representation. She did not disclose her ability to file ex-parte filings. She did not disclose that she will keep herself on my record against my will. She didn't disclose entering representation at all. These constitute consumer fraud. Please revoke her license.Page 6I called Shields' office at 8am to follow up on my letter to terminate services from 3/1/14 (enclosed). I was told to call at 10am. When I called Shields said she'd file a Notice of Withdrawal within 15 minutes. I left for court immediately. The register of action states that she filed her Motions at 3pm (enclosed). I didn't see her letter until I was back - and it is a lie. When exactly does she allege violence took place? She caused a strike against my restraining order and prevented successful substitution and continued litigation. Judge Moss tried to get the case back on track but Wolf was violating my right to be heard and was engaged in malpractice.Shields would not have preyed on a dangerous person.Invitations from the Rabbi would include attractions and remunerations (food, music, etc.) My husband is a sociopathic charmer. Shields looked like she was swept off her feet. She was out of her league.Japha has never stated that he personally had any bad interactions with me. He falsely alleged that others did based on Shield's liable. (enclosed)When I interviewed attorney Van Der Jagt, Shields spent 40 minutes falsely trashing me and he could see right through her. The same happened with all of the other attorneys I interviewed. She knew the GAL was a mistake and that she was being substituted. She didn't want her malpractice to be discovered. Wolf should have immediately entered substitution but instead pursued the GAL fraud scheme through negligent misrepresetnation.My experience with these attorneys has been that they will misuse and misconstrue whatever they can. But if they don't have materials to work with, they will flatly lie and invent things.The liable from Shields affected the secretary in division 4 and even an advocate at the crisis center. Other effects of the liable are to be estimated as I proceed.Mrs. Shields did not send the entire remainder of the retainer to Wolf and kept the difference. She made convenient accounting mistakes, counting a balance as a debt. She overcharged me $400 for a meeting that took only one hour. She stalled on the civil protection order so shouldn't charge me for any of it. Petitioner paid for the first snow plowing directly. But he stopped payments, while Shields charged to process receipts and correspondence. I dispute those charges. I got numerous copies of each correspondence. Is Shields trying to pretend she performed more work that she did? Is she trying to hide the email in which I ask her to desist from fraud? She charged me for those but never desisted. Charges will be disputed.Regarding the 3/10/14 telephone conversation, the transcript is enclosed. Shields lies, can't explain what better decisions she needs to help me make, as I was successful until her fraud scheme. She requests an urgent process without a hearing. Title 18 states that no GAL be appointed without medical records. Shields knows she can have a GAL appointed, prevent me from legal representation, prevent her dismissal, dismiss the mental evaluation because of the threats that create stressors, and have the GAL appoint her back and request unlimited budgets.I counted on Wolf to vacate the GAL. Magistrate Moss said I'd be heard but Wolf prevented it through malpractice. Wolf only referred to "previous considerations by the court." The only consideration was the unexamined allegations by Shields. Shields is fully responsible for the appointment of a GAL. (Enclose the status report)Page 7It wasn't "months later" that the court appointed the GAL. I was instantly deprived of the right for unbundled services, and all that Wolf needed to do was waste time until it was time for Shield's motion to be ruled on. He created a lack of representation, misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation, and in contradiction to the constitution prevented me from being heard. This was appealable, which is another time consuming complication I will take against Shields in civil litigation. Judge Moss saw me represent myself successfully in her court and wasn't sure what to do because of two consecutive cases of unconstitutional misrepresentation. The case kept shifting between divisions 7 and 4. Judge Arkin never met me, she was clueless, and was bound up by Moss's decision of 4/11/14 not to allow me self representation. Everything that is going on in court today is nothing but a technical complication that originated in Shield's initial decision to engage in malpractice. Meanwhile, I'm prevented from legal representation because there is a GAL, or an attorney, on my record. I will aspire to have DORA make general representation illegal as it is unconstitutional and not in line with capitalism.At this point the appeals court is waiting for a FINAL decision regarding the GAL. Not understanding court procedures is not an option anymore. Paranoid schizophrenia is not an option anymore. On 6/17/14 Judge Arkin put an end to the "lets trash Sigal" orgy by attorneys that Shield's fuels out of fear for civil law suit.I didn't retain Wolf to "assess the issue". Shields is being ridiculous. He promised to vacate the GAL and pursue a civil protection hearing. He was hired urgently to substitute Shields but once he had the signature and the Motion for GAL all he needed was some manipulative malpractice to get more money. This is consumer fraud at the least. Once he sends his answers I'll get the clarity with which I can justly request that his license be nicked for more.Shields should really read the Constitution sometimes. The way the United States Constitution works, each party gets to represent its own interests. Shields doesn't seem to have a grasp of this fact. That she would share it with others is worrisome. The judicial system needs to be revised. It is not there to serve the financial interests of Bonnie Shields but to serve the people.If an attorney can promise to pursue vacating the GAL and civil protection in order to be retained and then pursue the exact opposite, DORA needs to assume regulation. Wolf never disclosed this and his license should be revoked for consumer fraud. Meanwhile Shields should lose her license for liable and malpractice.An "Authorization to enter representation" standardized form signed by parties is required. It should state the attorney's understanding of the case before retainer and the intended litigation. Parties should get referrals to statutes at the self-help center and judges will be in a position to assess consumer fraud. If attorneys are not in a position to pursue the party's interest as per the constitution then they must withdraw.It is against theUnited Statesconstitution that attorneys represent whatever image of "justice" they can misconstrue through malpractice. For the Constitution to be upheld, each party must pursue its own interests in court. DORA must reorganize the attorney profession and judicial procedures need to be revised to reflect the same.I wrote consumer reviews. Shields counted on Wolf to fraudulently scare me into deleting them through misrepresentation. She gave me 5 days to erase them. I simply ignored her. Her email is enclosed to show the relationship between the two.Bonnie Shields told me herself that she was neighbors with Judge Arkin at our first meeting. Before retainer attorneys will be silent but avoid lies because the party can assess their statements. After entering general representation they are free to lie, prevent the party from legal advice and from communicating with the court, and keep themselves on record.Shields knew of a collection of rare bourbon bottles. I've had to remove it since then. The attorneys threatened to give the Offender keys to the marital home and have him enter when I'm gone. Petitioner/Offender regularly offers bottles to friends. I let Shields know that any bottles she gets will be permanently marked for identification. (letters from wolf)Weaver's police has always supported me based on evidence. They didn't believe any of the liable. One deputy suggested I could have neighbors testify that there isn't damage to the marital home to counter the false allegations by my attorneys. They got special training from advocates as to how I was prevented from a civil protection hearing by the judicial system.Page 84/11/14 the court denied Mr. Wolfs motion to withdraw because Bonnie Shields prevented me of my constitutional right for limited representation through malpractice. He allegations were never examined. The decision was made on 3/10/14. (lines) Minute order is enclosed. Wolf and Japha invited mistakes and the Judge Arkin completely lost track of what is happening.Substitution was not going to work as long as the Motion for GAL was on record. It allows attorneys to not work and control their own earnings while Shields take the bulk of risk of malpractice and censure of license. The financial incentive is too big.5/9/14 I believe that the public should be educated regarding the consumer traps of general representation. The judicial system should be revised to protect the constitution.I am an ambassador with Community Association Institute. In 2011 the meetings were crowded with homeowners helpless in the face of embezzlement and every bsignNow of statute and rule. Self-regulating HOA managers were only obligated to follow board direction and to "know" the governing documents. Boards were hiring HOA managers who exempted them from HOA fees and authorized embezzlement schemes. Homeowners who wanted financial disclosure suffered liable, intimidation and even racial slurs. Annual meeting and elections were regularly cancelled and boards nominated themselves. HOA managers didn't need to work or maintain properties, but only to cater to the boards exclusively.When I joined Community Association Institute DORA was already conducting a research. Now that DORA is assuming regulation homeowners are satisfied and Community Association Institute is offering valuable property management classes that were previously irrelevant to HOA mangers.I quit my job as an HOA manager and became a real estate broker because real estate brokers are DORA regulated and try to keep on their best behaviors.5/28/14 - Rose Zapor used common exploitation techniques that were never going to work ("You will soon find that I'm your only friend and no one else.") When she realized I had testimonies regarding no damage to the house, Roze Zapor misrepresented that I refuse to participate in hearings although I always called the secretary of division 7 asking to be included. She later stated that I've been previously removed from the court. That is also false. It could be liable from Shields. So between Shields and Zapor one should lose their license or both. Following my appeal I was included in a telephone conversation on 6/17/14. Now that I was heard, Zapor withdrew. I worry about her elderly victims.Rose Zapor ordered a flimsy 1.5 hour mental evaluation from an unsuitable doctor. Bonnie Shields and Robert Wolf created stressors that make any mental evaluation dismissable. An 8 hour hearing was scheduled around the useless evaluation although I'm deprived of legal representation. This is a scam.I asked the judge to take a 12 hour complete, current and valid evaluation. I asked her to stay the case for 6 months for an admissible evaluation.The Petitioner/Offender pleaded that I was not going to engage in mental evaluation "fully or meaningfully." ( attach motion ) This is word jugglery, as mental evaluation also examines the way a person participates. The Petitioner/Offender is extremely capable. Fighting him was going to be hard. Shields armed him with everything he needed, although the statutes are clear and the law is on my side. This will be the subject of a malpractice law suit.I sent Shield an itemized demand letter. I'm additionally requesting the entire $8,600 back. I will also file for personal injury, liable and malpractice. I'm waiting to estimate total damages regarding litigation, health, finances, well being, the bourbon collection, storage, etc.Page 8 - Response1. Shields didn't advise me of a mediation waver. She lies.2. Shields prepared me for self-representation at the telephone conference of 12/11/14. I scheduled Temporary Orders myself.3. Is Shields bragging about a few services rendered right at $250 per hour unbundled? Seven years of law school are not a prerequisite for citizens to enjoy their constitutional rights or to avoid the appointment of a GAL. She fails to show need for a GAL.4. Shields told she should have scheduled the vocational report "yesterday".5. At Temporary Orders David Japha demonstrated to the court that I'm financially capable, that I can hire vendors as a property manager and supervise them, that I can calculate profits in my head, that I can hire vendors and accomplish goals, that I'm not delusional (Petitioner was asked to testify), that I can concentrate on studies, that I'm a real estate broker with a limited authority to practice law. This renders all of Shield's arguments void and null. She can't justify either the Motion for GAL or the urgent procedure.6. Enforcement of Temporary Orders is being addressed, following Wolf's attempts to financially exhaust me.7. I only filed for a restraining order because Shields said she'd file a Notice of Withdrawal within 15 minutes. This is consumer fraud and malpractice. Zapor did the same by suggesting that I file for a restraining order in division 4. She was looking for excuses why she needed to retain an attorney in general representation after Wolf. But like I said, if attorneys are short of circumstances which they can twist and misrepresent, they simply invent them.8. What is the value of talking to a member of the ethics committee if Shields engages in misrepresentation and financial fraud? Whatever advice they gave is irrelevant or relies on the fact that attorneys aren't regulated, they want to make decisions without refering to police and medical records, and they pursue unjust enrichment, exhausting households, putting people through pain and suffering and avoiding consequences. Shields did not disclose Colorado Constitution Section 25 or Section 6. DORA should require that.9. I have the transcript from 3/10/14. The Geneva Convention is mentioned in page _ line -. My behavior was natural for any citizen who is taken advantage of by an attorney. Shields did not disclose that being "nice" to a manipulative and greedy attorney is a prerequisite for citizens to keep their legal entitlements. Court rules should be revised, but Shields should have a responsibility not to abuse them. Attorneys should be regulated, but Shields should have the responsibility not to exploit parties.Under what authority does Shields signNow that culture did not influence her decision? Again, She can't justify a GAL or an urgent appointment.10. Shields falsely kept nearly $2,900 in extra fees. All disputed.Page 9 - Responses to Questions1. I was not advised of the mediation waver.2. At court Shields confirmed that she'll order the vocational review and that she should have already done so.3. Question 3 was misrepresented. Shields rejected the stipulation ("mutual protection"). correctly while unbundled. Wolf presented it again falsely claiming he composed it. He can't possibly misconstrue this as representing my interest, at least not without relying on liable from Shields. But then he should admit consumer fraud in the promises he made in order to get retained.4. Shields acted out of greed, malice and corruption.5. Shields lied to the magistrate and engaged in liable. She told the magistrate that I think the magistrate takes bribes, which at the time I had no reason to believe. This is harmful liable. She said I yelled about civil protection order which is another lie. Her safety concerns are all fraud.6. I did not formally retain Mrs. Shields. She asked to be paid for her time in court in advance and gave me a contract stating the services my money gives me. This is consumer fraud.In conclusion - Bonnie Shields could not have engaged in anything but fraud, misrepresentation and malpractice when she filed her motion. None of her lies justify the Motion for GAL or the urgent appointment.To the extent that the attorneys can justify their behaviors, DORA should assume regulation.Reply to The ExhibitsNone of my emails attached justify a Motion for GAL, especially deprived of a hearing.Exhibit : The emails were fraudulently composed, and not in response to any questions. At $250 per hour I didn't respond but attempted termination of servicesExhibit: I didn't receive the letter until coming back from court. On the phone she misrepresented that she will file a Notice within 15, after 10am.The court appointed the GAL solely based on Shields' unexamined allegations. Wolf only referred to "previous decisions by the court," namely, the 3/10/14 decision to have him represent me . Arkin is clueless and I've been deprived of legal representation. The appeal was denied because a final decision wasn't made yet. A civil attorney told me there is no recourse but to wait for a final decision and appeal it. Shields has created a real problem by exploiting a serious consumer trap that needs to be revised.I will eventually get DORA to regulate attorneys and the judicial system revised. It is historically unprecedented that attorneys don't exploit parties, but so was the end of slavery.Writing to the Attorney Regulation Board is like writing Santa. You imagine there is somebody in your corner and that there is somebody in charge. It is an illusion. But it takes so long to process these complaints that by the time it is rejected you are past your initial grief.
Trusted esignature solution— what our customers are saying
Get legally-binding signatures now!
Related searches to Erase Electronic signature Document Myself
Frequently asked questions
How do i add an electronic signature to a word document?
How to create an electronic signature in paint?
How to sign a pdf with your web cam?
Get more for Erase Electronic signature Document Myself
- How To Electronic signature Louisiana Sports Word
- How Do I Electronic signature Louisiana Sports Word
- Help Me With Electronic signature Louisiana Sports Word
- How Can I Electronic signature Louisiana Sports Word
- Can I Electronic signature Louisiana Sports Word
- How To Electronic signature Louisiana Sports PDF
- How Do I Electronic signature Louisiana Sports PDF
- Help Me With Electronic signature Louisiana Sports PDF
Find out other Erase Electronic signature Document Myself
- This notice and the policy gpo form
- Federal registervol 76 no 142monday july 25 rules and gpo form
- Instructions for the consolidated permit application form
- Securities and exchange commission washington d c form
- 1 ply rx pads 100 prescriptions per pad form
- And delivering in duplicate to the commission articles of incorporation form
- This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts and does not form
- Name of property historic name adams county indiana courthouse ai form
- A dominant form of inherited retinal degeneration caused by a non
- Wisconsin group application small group form
- Application for housing usda rural housing service form
- Boilerplate of the risk based contract manufacturer order for human health concerns this is the boilerplate of the risk based form
- Agricultural land application of compostable material white paper 210 california department of resources recycling and recovery form
- Substitute teaching certificate ospi i form
- Review of contemporary corporate programs form
- The football and cheer program at nhpw shall apply annually for a charter form
- Colorectal cancer facts amp figures cancer form
- Relius 5500 forms amp reports american cancer society cancer
- It is important that you get as much information as you can before cancer
- Tenant rights and responsibilities the basics of renting form