ISO 27001:2013 Compliant SignNow's CRM Vs Close CRM

Check out the reviews of the airSlate SignNow CRM vs. Close CRM to compare the benefits, features, tools, and pricing of each solution.

Award-winning eSignature solution

What iso 270012013 compliant signnow's crm vs close crm means in practice

ISO 27001:2013 compliant signNow's CRM vs Close CRM refers to comparing how each platform addresses information security management and controls aligned with the ISO 27001:2013 standard, specifically for eSignature and CRM workflows. This includes organizational policies, documented processes, technical controls such as encryption and access management, evidence of third-party audits or certifications, and how those elements tie to practical obligations under ESIGN, UETA, and U.S. privacy regulations like HIPAA and FERPA when handling protected data.

Why security posture matters for eSignature and CRM workflows

A clear security and compliance posture reduces legal and operational risk, supports regulatory obligations for protected data, and provides verifiable controls for audit purposes when managing signed agreements and customer records.

Why security posture matters for eSignature and CRM workflows

Common security and compliance challenges

  • Differing certification statuses create uncertainty about which controls are independently audited and maintained across platforms.
  • Integrating eSignatures into CRM workflows can expand the attack surface if APIs lack proper authentication or rate limiting.
  • Managing BAAs, consent flows, and record retention for regulated data requires explicit vendor support and contractual safeguards.
  • Inconsistent audit trails or missing metadata reduce evidentiary value for non-repudiation and regulatory reviews.

Representative users and roles

IT Manager

An IT Manager assesses technical controls such as encryption standards, API security, SSO integration, and audit logging to ensure the chosen eSignature-plus-CRM solution fits organizational security architecture and compliance policies.

Compliance Officer

A Compliance Officer verifies certifications, review rights, data processing agreements, and BAA provisions where applicable, ensuring contractual and operational alignment with ESIGN, UETA, HIPAA, and record retention requirements.

Which teams benefit from comparing iso 270012013 compliant signnow's crm vs close crm

Security, legal, and operations teams evaluate ISO alignment to reduce risk, meet procurement requirements, and standardize controls across signature and CRM processes.

  • Legal and compliance teams reviewing vendor certifications and contractual terms for HIPAA, FERPA, and ESIGN compliance.
  • IT and security teams assessing encryption, authentication, and logging for integration with existing identity providers.
  • Sales operations and business users ensuring reliable signing workflows, templates, and audit trails within their CRM.

Procurement and audit stakeholders use these comparisons to document vendor selection rationales and to define required security clauses in contracts.

Additional controls and operational tools to check

Beyond core capabilities, examine specialized controls that support enterprise security and compliance requirements during CRM and signing lifecycle operations.

Role-based permissions

Granular permission settings let administrators restrict who can send documents, access signed records, export logs, or change retention policies, supporting separation of duties and least-privilege principles.

Retention policies

Configurable retention rules help enforce legal holds, archival schedules, and secure deletion aligned with organizational record management policies and regulatory obligations.

BAA and contract terms

Availability of Business Associate Agreements and clear data processing addenda is essential for handling protected health information under HIPAA and for meeting contractual compliance needs.

SOC and audit reports

Access to SOC 2, penetration test summaries, and audit reports enables security reviewers to validate operational controls and remediation timelines for identified issues.

Data residency options

Controls to select data storage regions or to restrict transfers support compliance with sector-specific or regional data handling requirements.

Template and field locking

Field-level locking and signer sequencing prevent unauthorized changes and ensure that required data is captured consistently across transactions.

be ready to get more

Choose a better solution

Core platform capabilities to evaluate

Focus on features that affect compliance, evidence, and integration: document controls, authentication, auditability, and API access for system-to-system workflows.

Document templates

Robust template libraries reduce errors by standardizing fields, required signer sequences, and prefilled data; templates should support versioning, conditional fields, and easy deployment into CRM records for repeatable, auditable processes.

Authentication methods

Multiple signer authentication options, including email verification, SMS codes, knowledge-based questions, and SSO integration, help meet differing assurance levels required by internal policy or external regulations.

Audit trails

Comprehensive, tamper-evident logs capture timestamps, IP addresses, and action histories to support non-repudiation, investigations, and regulatory audits while linking records back to CRM entities.

API & integrations

Well-documented APIs and prebuilt CRM connectors enable automated document generation, signature requests, and secure attachment of signed artifacts to customer records with proper access controls.

How iso 270012013 compliant signNow's crm vs close crm workflows typically operate

This sequence outlines the common flow from document creation through signature completion and CRM record attachment, highlighting controls to verify at each step.

  • Document creation: Create template with required fields and metadata.
  • Signature request: Send signed request with authentication options.
  • Signing process: Signers authenticate; signatures are captured.
  • CRM linkage: Signed document attaches to CRM record with audit logs.
Collect signatures
24x
faster
Reduce costs by
$30
per document
Save up to
40h
per employee / month

Quick setup steps for iso 270012013 compliant signNow's CRM vs Close CRM integration

A concise setup checklist helps teams establish secure integration points and baseline configurations before going live with signature workflows in a CRM.

  • 01
    Assess requirements: Document compliance and data handling needs.
  • 02
    Review certifications: Confirm vendor audits and reports.
  • 03
    Configure SSO: Enable SAML or OIDC and enforce MFA.
  • 04
    Test workflows: Validate templates, logs, and retention rules.

Detailed checklist: deploying iso 270012013 compliant signNow's crm vs close crm

A grid-style checklist teams can follow when deploying secure signing workflows integrated with CRM, emphasizing verification and testing steps before production use.

01

Define scope:

Identify data types and coverage
02

Verify certifications:

Obtain audit and SOC reports
03

Configure identity:

Enable SSO and MFA
04

Set retention:

Apply legal retention rules
05

Run pilot:

Test with limited users
06

Review logs:

Confirm audit completeness
be ready to get more

Why choose airSlate SignNow

  • Free 7-day trial. Choose the plan you need and try it risk-free.
  • Honest pricing for full-featured plans. airSlate SignNow offers subscription plans with no overages or hidden fees at renewal.
  • Enterprise-grade security. airSlate SignNow helps you comply with global security standards.
illustrations signature

Recommended workflow configuration for secure signing and CRM linkage

Suggested settings and defaults for integrating eSignature workflows with a CRM to meet common ISO-aligned control objectives while preserving usability for sales and operations teams.

Setting Name Configuration
Template Approval Requirement Enabled
Reminder Frequency 48 hours
Retention Policy Default 7 years
SSO Enforcement Window Immediate
Audit Log Export Schedule Daily

Supported platforms for iso 270012013 compliant signnow's crm vs close crm workflows

Both signNow and Close CRM support modern web browsers and mobile apps, but exact requirements and capabilities differ for offline or embedded signing scenarios.

  • Web browsers: Chrome, Edge, Safari supported
  • Mobile apps: iOS and Android native apps
  • API access: REST API with OAuth2

Validate version requirements and browser security settings, ensure mobile app policies meet MDM controls if required, and confirm API rate limits and OAuth configurations for robust production integrations.

Security controls to compare

Encryption at rest: AES-256
Encryption in transit: TLS 1.2+
Authentication options: SSO, MFA
Access controls: Role-based
Audit logging: Immutable logs
Data residency: US/EU options

Industry scenarios using iso 270012013 compliant signnow's crm vs close crm

Representative examples show how healthcare, education, and sales organizations apply certified controls and eSignature practices when integrating with CRMs.

Healthcare clinical consent

A regional clinic digitizes patient consent forms with compliant eSignatures to centralize records and reduce physical paperwork

  • Uses templates and secure authentication
  • Improves turnaround time and auditability

Resulting in clearer audit trails and simplified HIPAA-compliant retention and reporting.

Higher-education records

A university centralizes FERPA-protected enrollment agreements in a CRM with controlled access and signed acknowledgements

  • Integrates SSO and role-based permissions
  • Reduces manual handling and access errors

Leading to stronger evidence of consent and streamlined compliance during regulatory reviews.

Operational best practices for secure eSignature and CRM integration

Adopt procedural and technical practices that reduce risk, ensure legal validity under U.S. law, and simplify audits when using signNow with CRM systems compared to Close CRM workflows.

Enforce multi-factor authentication for all platform and API access
Require MFA for all user logins and administrative actions, and enforce short-lived API keys or OAuth tokens for integrations. This reduces account compromise risk and aligns with common audit expectations for identity assurance.
Retain immutable audit logs and back them up off-platform
Ensure audit trails are preserved in a tamper-evident format and maintain secondary backups or exports under your control to support forensic reviews and long-term retention obligations.
Use role-based access controls and least privilege for templates
Limit template creation and sending privileges to designated roles, enforce approval workflows for sensitive documents, and segregate duties to reduce accidental or malicious misuse.
Document contractual safeguards and data processing terms
Obtain written data processing agreements, clarify breach notification responsibilities, and confirm BAA availability when handling protected health data to meet regulatory and contractual requirements.

FAQs and troubleshooting for iso 270012013 compliant signNow's crm vs close crm

Answers to common questions and remediation steps when working with signNow and Close CRM integrations, with a focus on compliance, authentication, and evidence collection.

Feature-level comparison for iso 270012013 compliant signNow's crm vs close crm

A concise comparison of crucial compliance and security features, showing availability and status for signNow (first) and Close CRM (second) across typical enterprise criteria.

Comparison Feature and Compliance Criteria signNow (Recommended) Close CRM
ISO 27001:2013 certification and audit coverage Controls aligned Not certified
ESIGN and UETA legal compliance status Compliant Compliant
HIPAA readiness and BAA availability BAA available Requires arrangement
Comprehensive audit trails and non-repudiation evidence Detailed logs Basic logs
be ready to get more

Get legally-binding signatures now!

Risks and potential penalties of non-compliance

Regulatory fines: Significant
Breach notification: Mandatory
Contractual liability: Damages
Loss of trust: Reputational hit
Operational disruption: Service downtime
Legal disputes: Increased risk
walmart logo
exonMobil logo
apple logo
comcast logo
facebook logo
FedEx logo
be ready to get more

Get legally-binding signatures now!