Convert Sign Word Later

To convert scanned PDF to Word effectively, use airSlate SignNow's powerful PDF conversion tools. Our service utilizes advanced OCR technology to accurately convert scanned documents into editable Word files. With just a few clicks, you can transform your scanned PDFs into editable formats, saving you time and effort.

Yes, airSlate SignNow offers flexible pricing plans that make it affordable to convert scanned PDF to Word. Depending on your needs, you can choose a subscription that suits your budget. Our service delivers high-quality results at a competitive price point.

While airSlate SignNow provides a robust solution to convert scanned PDF to Word, some complex formatting may not be preserved perfectly. However, our OCR technology aims to capture text accurately and make your documents editable. Users should review converted files for any adjustments needed.

Absolutely! airSlate SignNow allows you to try our services for free, enabling you to convert scanned PDF to Word without any initial commitment. This trial gives you a chance to evaluate our features and see how well we meet your document conversion needs.

airSlate SignNow's PDF to Word conversion includes high-accuracy OCR technology, batch processing, and user-friendly interfaces. We ensure that you can quickly and easily convert scanned PDF to Word while maintaining the integrity of the original document. Additionally, our software supports a variety of output formats.

Data security is a top priority at airSlate SignNow. When you convert scanned PDF to Word, all documents are encrypted during the process, ensuring your sensitive information remains private. We adhere to stringent security protocols to keep your documents safe.

Yes, airSlate SignNow offers seamless integrations with various applications, making it easier to convert scanned PDF to Word and manage your documents. You can connect our service with your favorite tools to streamline your workflow and enhance productivity.

Yesterday only I got conned and realized it today. And I hope people read this and don't get conned the way I did.So yesterday while going out with my parents, my dad pointed out that my car's front bumper had got some scratches on the driver side, and how he had gotten​ all the scratches fixed few months back in a Maruti service station and how they charge so much and everything.On our journey to home, we stopped to get the fuel tank refilled. And in a side passage of that petrol pump few people were selling something. While we were waiting for our turn at the pump, one of the guys approached my dad and said that they were selling some stain removing kit and it would also clear the scratches on my car and that he'd like to give a demo.Now we already had few scratches here and there on my car and a free demo was only going to reduce them so we agreed to have a demo of that kit. And went to that guy for a demo.Now while we were getting our fuel tank refilled, there was another person about the age of 60 with his white Hyundai verna getting a demo and we saw that he purchased couple of those kits.Now that guy started giving us a demo on our car. There was a small bottle from which he got some creamy white fluid on the area where there were scratches and started rubbing it in circular motion and well the scratches did disappear.He told us that he would give us the entire kit which actually costed about 1500Rs. just for 800Rs. that being promotional price. And also that he would remove all the scratches from my car using that kit only right there.That kit contained a spray bottle which was to be used after removing scratches to clean extra fluid and some other bottle which would prevent scratches and the other one would clean stains from dashboard and windshield.While he was doing this, I checked those containers and turns out that no ingredients were written on any of those bottles and just the name and directions to use the kit was written on them. I also asked him about what was in those bottles but all he said was cleaning fluids.That kit looked similar to this. Image has been taken from GoogleSo we agreed and bought that with hesitation and he removed most of the stains and scratches from my car using half of the kit that we had bought.Now today, I googled it and realized that the white creamy fluid was unscented toothpaste, the sprayer bottle to use to clean that white fluid was water and the third sprayer bottle apparently had nothing more than toothpaste water.Well for that which didn't contain anything more than half of a small Colgate, water and a sponge I was charged 800Rs. I am not sure if he had joined hands with thay petrol pump or had just asked them to use the empty place. But it seemed they were not allowed to interrupt petrol pump's work.But whatever it was, I had been scammed and I think there must have been many more people like me who got scammed, as it was Sunday and that is a usually busy Petrol pump.I feel stupid.And I also wonder how much that guy would be making by duping people.But guys please don't fall prey to such con-men.And if you don't trust me, you can Google to find out how toothpaste helps with scratch and stain removing and preventing scratches. And verify by yourself.Thank you for reading.

It depends on the language.In many languages, it is used as the modulo or remainder operator in arithmetical computations.The modulo of two numbers is the remainder that is left over when integer dividing the first by the second:e.g. modulo (5,2) = 1 (5/2 = 2, 5%2 = 1) 1 is the remainder after dividing integers 5/2.modulo (27,8) = 3 (27/8 = 3, with a remainder of 3)-rsr-

I’m so tired of you people who can’t tell anything real, including Mack Lee:Key words in the junior high school history textbooks:WARNING. WARNING. WARNINGevil British imperialism(how they cheat and bully innocent Chinese)brave Chinese people and soldiers(for example,Guan Tian Pei general and San Yuan Li movement against British)dark old China, backward Qing government(imply that only CCP can save China)iconic event in mordern Chinese history (generally say the first Opium War is the beginning of mordern Chinese history)Okay, Mr. Lee, if you can’t read, let me translate it for you. No word more, no word less, just direct translation.Chinese junior high school history textbook for Eighth Grade, the first volume.This book is used to teach kids who are generally 12 - 14 years old.第1课 鸦片战争(第4页)-人教版八年级上册历史电子课本Lin Zexu to Destroy Opium in Humen (translator’s note: Humen, a town in Guangdong province, currently afflicted to Dongguan City)In the first half of the 19th century, Great Britain became the most powerful capitalist country. To expand overseas market, promote industrial products, and pillage cheap industrial materials, Great Britain pointed the spearhead of invasion at China. At the time, Britain was exporting woolen goods and piece goods to China, but they were hard to sell. In contrast, Britain needed to buy a large amount of tea, silk, and porcelain from China. Later on, Great Britain found that engaging in drug opium trade was profiteering, so it started to smuggle opium to China, thereby deepening the weakness of China. Meanwhile, opium was seriously destroying the physique of drug addicts. The import of opium brought a grave disaster to the Chinese nation.Back then, a knowledgeable minister of Qing Dynasty, Lin Zexu, gave an advice to Daoguang emperor, requesting the strict prohibition of opium. He seriously and grievingly pointed out: “if opium is not prohibited as soon as possible, I'm afraid there will be no troops who can fight, or silver which can be used as military expenditures”. Emperor Daoguang felt the problem was serious, so he sent Lin Zexu to Guangdong province to prohibit drugs.In March, 1839, Lin Zexu arrived in Guangdong province. He sent personnels to secretly investigate the issue, apprehending drug dealers, and forced foreign businessmen to hand over more than 220 millions pounds of opium. On June 3th, Lin Zexu ordered that all seized opium should be destroyed on a beach in Humen publicly.The Destruction of Opium in Humen is the great victory of Chinese people's anti-drug struggle, which showed the Chinese nation’s strong will against foreign invasion. The leader of this struggle, Lin Zexu, fully deserves the name of national hero.Sino-British Treaty of NankingThe guilty opium was prohibited by China, and the British government decided to wage the war of invasion.In June, 1840, the British fleet sailed to Guangdong coast and started their provocation. The Opium War broke out. Lin Zexu proactively defended, and the British army had no chance so they went north. At the time, the army of Qing dynasty’s defense was a vacuum in the area north of Fu Jian province. British army caputured Dinghai City in Zhejiang province and kept going north until pressing against Tianjin City. Daoguang emperor was very horrified. He sent the Viceroy of Zhili province (TN: currently Hebei province. Tianjin City was afflicted to Zhili province at the time), Qishan to negotiate with the British army and later on sacked Li Zexu for further investigation and judgement. In early 1841, the British army seized Hongkong island. The Qing government felt the loss of dignity, and fought against the British army again. However, in the one year of battle, Qing army was gradually losing ground. British ships arrived at Changjiang river, near to Nanking city. Qing government was compelled to send personnels to British army for peace.In 1842, Brith invaders forced Qing government to sign the Sino-British Treaty of Nanking, which humiliated China and forfeited its sovereignty. The treaty stipulated: ceding the Hongkong island to Great Britain; 21 million Spanish Carolus Dollars for reparations, opening Guangzhou, Xiamen, Fuzhou, Ningbo, and Shanghai as trading ports; China has to discuss and decide the duties of British businessmen’s imported/exported goods with Great Britain.I'll get back to this translation later. I can guarantee here, that there is no such thing as British imperialism in the textbook. Imperialism is usually used as a general concept, instead of being used to point finger at certain countries in textbooks.My personal opinion is, this texbook is just like directly quoted from Wikipedia. Of course it doesn't tell you the story of Lord Gladstone, but I believe it's far from biased.Updated. Mack Lee’s comment.As a Chinese, I can't forget the westerners and the Japanese nasty behavior. However, I object to the "victim complex" in history education. It will make our next generation feel inferior. And, frankly, China is lucky, at least compared to Turkey.I'm always dubious about this so-called “victim mentality” concept, which is actually pretty popular among Chinese expats and some Anglophones. For example, User-13731474021423421919’s comment. User-13731474021423421919's answer to Do Chinese people think the CCP should formally apologize for the wounds which the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution inflicted?And regarding your final point - yes, I agree that China is rather misunderstood by the “outside world”… frankly, this victim mentality is getting old. Not everyone is out to get China *, and treating everyone as such is just marring China’s image and driving potential allies away.What is the logic behind it? Does nationalism equal victim mentality?The US said: Japan invaded Pearl Harbor, and we kicked their ass later on in her textbooks.China said: Japan and big brothers invaded here and there, and we weren't able to kick their ass, but we are working hard to catch up with them in her textbooks. What's wrong with it? Do Chinese have to kick everybody's ass successfully in the history, in order to get rid of the “victim mentality”?No we do not. China has her own national interest, her own patriotism, and her own nationalism. Everytime they try to use extreme nationalists to undermine China's nationalism, it actually makes me wanna laugh. When it comes down to it, nationalism doesn't conflict with the globalization thingy. Everybody is having it. We are going to hold it, proudly.Doubting the history textbooks’ narrative seems to be the real “victim mentality” to me. Nobody needs to cringe to fit in. And we don't forget the history.I wanted to translate this textbook, because I know that the so-called “hatred education” that the West has been portraying has never existed. They point finger at it partly because they don't know about China's history textbook, but most importantly, it’s because they want to imply: “We already converted! If you're still using the colonist mindset (which we abandoned just not long ago), you will be considered as uncivilized”. I'm not going to buy their story. History is history.Updated. Translation complete.I've read the high school history textbook as well. More details, but still no “victim mindset”.The thing is, there are a lot of people who still believe there's a thing as “victim mindset”. They received China's education, and then were unconsciously influenced by the, say, reality distortion field surrounding China these days.It actually won't take you long to read your textbook again.Do you see “face” in the text book? No.Are Chinese textbooks filled by hatred? No.Is sovereignty important? Yes.Which part of the word-word translation I made doesn't reflect the global consensus? I can't see any.One more thing, “only CCP can save China” doesn't appear in textbooks.

The Mongol destruction of the Khwarezmid Empire (Persia) in the 13th century,In the year of 1219, the barbaric and good-for-nothing Mongol Hordes commanded by Genghis Khan invaded the Khwarezmid Empire, and brought nothing but utter destruction, chaos and death with them.The barbaric Mongols massacred the populations of entire cities and razed them to the ground. This includes great cities such as Bukhara and Samarkand. Prior to the Mongol invasion of Persia, these two cities were considered among the most prestigious and prosperious cities in Asia, and a lot of scientific advancements were made in them.The massacre of the inhabitans of the city Neyshapur is considered among the bloodiest in history.The Mongols destroyed all buildings and killed all people, mostly by beheading the ones that surrendered, and then making a pyramid out of the heads. This is how disgusting, inhumane and barbaric the Mongols were.Historians estimate up to a 1.000.000 Persians were slaughtered to death.According to the works of the Iranian historian Rashid al-Din the Mongols killed more than 700,000 people in Merv and more than a million in Neyshapur. The total population of Persia may have dropped from 2,500,000 to 250,000 as a result of mass extermination and famine.The Mongols also caused massive starvation, by burning all the farmers crops This includes the countrysides water irrigation systems, which destroyed the ancient farming systems and left hundreds of thousands of Persians to starve to death.Ghengiz Khan waged war across all of Asia, including China, Central Asia, and most of the Middle East.More than 5% of the worlds population died as a result of his invasions. If we take that percentage into relative terms, and 5% of todays population died, the number would be as high as 350.000.000 million people!Let that sink in for a moment…I have never understood the Western facination and admiration of Ghenghis Khan, who was a barbaric invader and responsible for so much death. Seriously he is idolized and romantized in for example the Netflix show “Marco Polo”, which makes me want to puke.Seriously, Ghengiz Khan is as bad as Hitler, imagine if Chinese or Iranian TV stations began to produce movies that showcased Hitler as a considerate and humane leader, imagine the outrage that would cause.The unfiltered truth is that Ghengiz Khan was a brutal mass murderer, responsible for genocides that surpassed even Hitler’s Holocaust.Sources:r/AskHistorians - Did Genghis Khan really order his men to behead 1.75 million people in the city of Nishapur?Mongol conquest of KhwarezmiaIran - The Mongol invasion

Well, to be honest, in the case of free-enterprise (as in the US, in most cases) a dealership can literally charge whatever they want. If they wanted to bait someone for a $100k Toyota Corolla, let them. Supply and demand typically dictates this isn’t going to happen cause why would I pay for a $100k Corolla when I can go to any other (sane) dealer in the area and pay market-value. Sometimes manufacturers or other entities will have agreements that prevent excessive over or undercharging for items/services, but for the most part, I’m not sure such an agreement exists in the auto industry.This “the market will sort itself” becomes a bit more skewed when you look at things where the supply is extremely limited. Limited production-run cars, new models that are being introduced(basically flowing through the supply chain from manufacturer to dealer) and models that have some specific options/configuration. We see this with limited production models of Lamborghini, one-off specialty and concept cars, and late-model cars with specific engines or matching serial numbers and in good shape at auction for example. The market can’t really adjust for these, but for the most-part, if I have any given standard production car and can get it “anywhere” then there will be downward pressure on the price to the equilibrium point (customer wants to pay less, dealer wants to get more, they meet “in the middle”). The downward pressure on the $100k Corolla dealer comes from the fact his competitors are charging much less(and the consumer is getting it), and the upward pressure is always on the consumer as the relative price-floor is the MSRP/market-price(you can see it somewhat represented on sites like TrueCar where they show what other people pay for similar cars).So back to the “the dealer can charge whatever they want”. If the dealer has the only version of a car available, normally you can negotiate the price down to something reasonable, but sometimes they seek to “gouge” the customer. They know they have the only “supply”(like a monopoly) and can charge whatever they want, because if someone wants it they’ll pay whatever they say. We know the model of capitalism and free-enterprise breaks down at a certain point, but if the model is just “hard to get” and not “one-of-a-kind”, I’d say vote with your dollars and see if another dealership wants your money more and can get that car at a fair price.

The biggest and continuing mistake in the growing data science field is the tendency to start with thinking on the basis of a small set of algorithms. Any quantitative analysis process should always start with the problem itself and quantifying how humans go about it. Humans beings are able to solve problems of amazing complexity with the explanation that "it's obvious". Some basic questions to ask:What exactly is meant by "setiment"?In relation to what : eg. history, other stimulus?Could the same observation stem from multiple and different underlying causes? Eg. sarcasmCould time potentially matter?Is the method robust?The aim is to quantify and make the black box capability of a human to form judgements, into a process. Often the best that can be done is to select a set of input parameters and think about how ways in which the observation is structured underneath and then select a tool. For example, consider medical diagnosis. Two patients can present identical symptoms of a headache and being short of breath. Both played sports in the heat on the same day, but one has a history of high BP and is genetically predisposed to certain heart ailments. The other patient is quite the caffeine buff, and hasn't been eating properly in an effort to lose weight.If these latter factors aren't considered, a simple algorithm may assign them the same treatment, which is incorrect and dangerous. There is a progression to the underpinning causes, and the next steps also must also be considered in classifying the treatment. What are their goals; what can they be? This isn't a terribly complex example but shows how vital it is to think systemically and scientifically before shopping for an algorithm. Would a naive Bayesian model work here? Why or why not?Markov-style models, SVMs and neural networks are different -- the latter are cousins (be able to describe this in a simple sentence). The second half of smart modelling is to know the basics of how these methods work : what do they look for etc? Could time series methods be used, perhaps in conjunction with some basic recurrent neural nets?Analysis of sentiment is no different than our toy medical case. Sure, you could try a bag of words approach and hope for decent results, but that's been done about 2 decades ago. I would challenge you to challenge the status quo.It's vital to understand how different methods work. It's not necessary to prove convergence of the perceptron algorithm by heart by you should know what that means on a high level, and more importantly, where it doesn't / succeeds (look up the XOR or parabolic distro problem for basic perceptrons and linear SVMs). Question the methods and try to begin with intuition as a human and then quantify it. Vector spaces are beautiful and powerful but so often misunderstood and used with the wrong tools for the right problem.The growth of data science is being fuelled by a myriad short courses online. They're all great, but there's no substitute for patiently and painfully learning the foundations. It doesn't take long but it's rewarding and will arm you to question the biases of the top links on Google (or Quora, as the case may be), and even my response here.Solve first. Code later.

Though Pakistan is a nation which belongs to the 21st century in it’s current existence; did not exist before 1947. But, Pakistan and India got independence in the year 1947 on 14th & 15th Aug respectively. The whole concept of dividing the single nation India in to 2 nations we framed by then Leader of Muslim League M.A. Jinnah.British also did not want India as one large nation, kept supporting this theory and were even fueling the matter. After WW-II the British had to leave India as there was a signNow revolt within the Royal Indian Army as Subash Chandra Bose was ready to attack the British who lived within India with his 60000 troops of the Indian National Army. Due to Subash Bose’s presence in the Mayanmar (then Burma) borders, the Soldiers of the Royal Indian Army started revolts across the nation. This terrified the British.So, the British thought it is wise to slip out of India or get killed in the battle like they had to in the USA 150 years ago. This also because the British were war torn and Indian Army strength which was beefed up to 25,00,000 soldiers due to WW-II (Indian Soldiers fought for British in WW-II), and these soldiers were now revolting against the British. On the other side Subash Bose was ready to take over the command of these revolting soldiers of RIA.Thus the British planned a quick transfer of power to the natives of India and quit India as quickly as possible. So, they called Gandhi, Nehru and Jinnah. They declared that India will be split in to two nations (1) a Muslims ruled Pakistan under the leadership of M.A. Jinha and (2) a Hindus’ ruled India under the leadership of J.L. Nehru. However the last Viceroy of Britain was requested by the Indian government to stay for some time as the Governer General as the Pakistani nation was creating some troubles across the borders of J&K and some areas.J&K was a princely State within India, which was independent like many other states before Independence was ruled by a Hindu King and the majority of his population were Muslims. Pakistan used some tribal groups first to inf literate J&K and later used their Army disguised like the tribal groups. The King of J&K requested Indian PM to help him as those tribes were creating havoc in his state. India got this matter that the Pakistani Army was also involved and agreed to support the J&K king, but asked him to sign the agreement to become a part of the Union of Indian Republic, and the King happily signed the deed and thus India sent it’s army to handle the situation.The conflicts were sporadic and lasted for a very long period. Thus a situation came the state of J&K was split as PoK (Pakistan occupied Kashmir) and the rest was Indian part. This line is called the LOC or the line of control. The nations like USSR (then), USA, UK asked both nations for a ceasefire and sit across tables and discuss the matter diplomatically. The condition was that Pakistan must vacate it’s troops from PoK and so must India, for the discussions to happen.Unfortunately though India moved it’s troops from the PoK, Pakistan had them stationed even till today. This lead to wars in 1965, 1971, 1990s. In 1971 Pakistan which had it’s eastern wing called E-Pakistan (east of India) became an Independent nation called Bangladesh.This became a grudge for the Pakistani military and wanted revenge on India, thus they turned in use Infiltrators and many more ways (a different story). However in it’s pursuit to maintain an Islamic nation; Pakistan made too many compromises and fell in to the trap of the cold war between USSR and USA since 1960 s till today.Later the Arabic nations who aimed to convert the whole world in to Islam had a slogan - which is called the “Gazzwai Hind”. Now the link is as follows:It must be understood since 800 AD there were many attempts by the Arabic people to convert the whole world to Islam and successfully converted Turkey, Egypt, Prussia (now Iran & Iraq), many Baltic nations up to Afghanistan. They tried to do the same with Hindustan - but failed in their mission as Hindus kept fighting even till 1700 AD before the British came. By this time the Hindu kings under the Marat regime cornered the Moughals and restricted them to areas around Delhi and UP. But they became war torn and British came with modern weapons could not match them. Even the British could not impose Christianity on Indians, this is because of the strong cultural heritage of India and the sprite to fight back existed - Jhansi Lakshmi Bhai & Subash Bose were an example to this). Thus each invader Islamic or Christian who came for different purposes settled to rule the people of India than convert the.So, there is a crib within the Abrahamic religions and especially Islam; that is even though they could convert half of Asia in to Islam just within 70 years, even after 800 years they could not do the same with Indian people. The Christians were trying using their methods of converting Hindus’ to their religion could manage a me-gar 2%, the Islamic people who were given permission by the Indian government in 1947 to stay in India if they want to or leave to Pakistan, many stayed in India and now India is the 2nd largest Muslim populated nation in the World next to Indonesia (14%). But on the contrary - 15% of the Hindu population in Pakistan were forced to become Muslims and they are hardly 1 % to 2% in Pakistan.Thus the grudge of their inability to convert Hinduism to Islam the Arabic nations created a slogan “Gazzwai Hind”. To convert Hindustan in to an Islamic nation, they used some words of Quron, called it Jihad or some kind of Holy war. This needed a military and mercenaries. Thus Pakistan became useful since 1947, and after Afghan crises the USSR withdrew due to US trained Hizbul Mujahideen and Thallibhans these tribal groups in Afghanistan had no job which they were trained for, became handy to create terrorism across the Indian sub-continent. These people were later been used in a different names with Arabic support became Al-Quida. To create troubles among Arabs USA and S. Arabia gave another name - ISIS.See the above image to understand the fundamentals of these people.Now Pakistan is doing that dirty job of Jihad in India and the World. So, you can understand one thing is Pakistan does not have any kind of moral and value, they it is a nation of haired Mercenaries in modern outfit and they will never accept to any terms from India to give up their ways until they get destroyed in to several separate nations (that’s their destiny) and choice too. It will be foolish for India or any nation to expect any thing different from Pakistan. So, they keep the J&K issue alive, so that they can get more and more foreign funds from USA, S. Arabia and now China.

The death of my 17 year old son. In 2016 my son started complaining of pain in his hip/thigh area. We of course took him to the pediatrician (he was 16 at the time). Doctor said it was because his bone was growing faster than the leg muscle. Okay, fine. The pain continued. Doctor ordered x-rays. Nothing shows up. Pain continues. Doctor orders blood work. Inconclusive. Pain continues…actually getting worse. Doctor orders a CAT scan. Inconclusive. Doctor refers us to a rheumatologist. They diagnose him with juvenile arthritis. Then change their diagnosis to a slightly different form of arthritis.Okay, fine. We have a diagnosis. And it’s not a worst case scenario diagnosis. At this point my son is in intense pain. The only thing that helps is steaming hot showers, and that, according to him, only took his mind off his hip pain. The night before the second worst day of my life, my son spent most of it in the shower. Oh, and they also had my son going to physical therapy for the past month or so. So, we inform the rheumatologist we would like to start treatment for the arthritis. He says he would like one final CAT scan. I take my son later that day for one, not thinking much about it. At this point he had been poked and prodded, had multiple x-rays and a prior CAT scan. I thought the diagnosis had been determined. We come home from the scan, and my ex wife calls me. The rheumatologist had called her (apparently he only had her number) and he want’s my son in the hospital, like, yesterday. The scan apparently lit up like a Christmas tree this time.My son had been in pain, as I said. We immediately took him to the hospital, and he reported his pain level at a 10. They gave him morphine. They told us they suspected cancer but would need a biopsy to confirm. It came back positive for a rare childhood cancer called ewing sarcoma (I know that should probably be capitalized…sorry…I’m not gonna capitalize the name of this awful fucking cancer. ewing sarcoma is a bone cancer. From when my son first started complaining of pain to when he was finally (accurately) diagnosed, seven months had gone by. Seven months that we lost when we could have been actively battling this disease. They then did a full body scan and confirmed it had already spread to his lungs. I didn’t want to ask the oncologist what his odds were. I simply couldn’t stand hearing another human being tell me that information. Instead I went online and discovered that, at my son’s stage, the odds of survival were 30% at best.We fought. He fought. Chemo, radiation. Almost a full year of it. He had to be on crutches or a wheelchair because the cancer had nearly destroyed his upper femur. That was horrific hearing because as I said before he was (properly) diagnosed he was undergoing physical therapy…which could easily have shattered the bone. But he was responding positively to the chemo. After about eight months his leg scan showed clear and he was allowed to walk again. He was also allowed into a clinical study intended to match treatment to a particular cancer’s DNA. Things seemed to be looking up. I should also mention that, from when he was first administered morphine in the ER up until this point, his pain level went from a 10 to 0. To see your teenage son in pain for those seven months prior was a hell I don’t wish on anyone. So the fact that he was pain free during this period was a blessing. Fast forward another two months, My son has a full body MRI that show’s he is free of cancer. There were still a few nodules in his lungs but we were told those were most likely scar tissue from where his tumors used to be. We were euphoric.About a week later, I’m taking my kids to hang for the day with some good family friends. My son is quiet. I don’t think much of this…he was 17 and like any teenager could be quite moody at times. We got to the campground where we were meeting our friends when my son tells me his neck was hurting him. Like, lots. We call the oncologist, and are told to bring him in to the ER. They look him over, tell me it’s probably just muscle cramps possibly a side effect from one of the many drugs he’s been taking. I accepted this. After all, he just received an all clear scan. I can’t recall if it was one or two days later that we took him to the Children’s Hospital for his regularly scheduled appointment. He is still experiencing severe neck pain. Doctors do a MRI on his neck and back. It’s riddled with cancer. So, we go from a phone call from my son’s oncologist the week prior saying my son is cancer free, to being told later this day that my son’s cancer is terminal.My reaction? I was livid. I was red with anger. It took my son 7 months to be properly diagnosed (which really is what cost him his life. This cancer, caught early on, is very curable). There was another chart reading error made by the oncology team that happened prior which I haven’t gone into on here. There was going to the ER and being told it was just muscle spasms. And now after getting an “all clear” scan being told that not only is it not all clear, but in fact terminal!!! The oncologist explained that the whole body scan wasn’t capable of detecting cancer in the spine or some crap like that. I was never told that. I was never told that the “all clear” scan meant anything other than just that. The oncologist didn’t really seem to get my frustration and suggested I was free to take my son elsewhere if I wasn’t satisfied. Can you believe that. This person had been my son’s oncologist for 11 months, and this is the response I get.My son was given weeks to months to live. He ended up living another five months. He passed away on Valentine’s day of this year. The worst day of my life. And now my heart hurts every day.Edit: could i get a doctor to chime in? Why Not do a biopsy first. Bone and muscle. Rule out cancer. I know, costs so much. But guess what. My son would be alive now if this was policy.Edit2: So after the better part of two years I decided to contact a lawyer to see if a malpractice suit was even feasible. And after all you've read above, in the State of Michigan, USA, it is not. The only way I could sue and win is if they were withholding treatment to an extent until they discovered the cancer was spreading. So, oncologists in Michigan, go ahead, tell that family your loved one is free of cancer. Then, in the next week, let them know it's terminal. In the Great State of Michigan, that's all perfectly legal. And, I hate to get political, but it's compliments of the republican party which has ruled this state for 18 years and has decimated a citizen’s ability to sue for malpractice.