eSignature Document for IT Safe

A document safe is a secure way to store and manage important documents online. With airSlate SignNow, you can eSign and send documents while ensuring they are encrypted and protected, making it a reliable document safe for your business needs.

airSlate SignNow offers robust features such as advanced encryption, audit trails, and multi-factor authentication to ensure your documents are kept safe. This means you can trust that your sensitive information is protected while easily managing your document workflow.

airSlate SignNow offers various pricing plans to accommodate different business needs, making it a cost-effective document safe option. Pricing includes essential features for eSigning and document storage, ensuring you find a plan that fits your budget.

Yes, airSlate SignNow allows for seamless integration with various third-party applications, enhancing its functionality as a document safe. You can connect it with popular tools like Google Drive, Dropbox, and CRMs for a more streamlined document management experience.

Using airSlate SignNow as your document safe comes with numerous benefits, including increased security, ease of use, and improved workflow efficiency. It allows you to manage documents effectively while ensuring they remain confidential and easily accessible.

Absolutely! airSlate SignNow provides dedicated customer support to ensure that any issues you face with the document safe are resolved promptly. Whether you have technical questions or need help with features, our team is available to assist you.

airSlate SignNow prioritizes user experience, making its document safe easy to navigate for everyone. The intuitive design allows users to quickly learn how to upload, sign, and manage documents without any steep learning curve.

So I'm the founder and CEO of ApproveMe and the  WP E-Signature WordPress plugin which focuses 100% on legally binding documents and UETA & ESIGN compliance in the WordPress space.Being an eSignature geek myself, I have the same concerns you do about the vulnerability of storing images of a signature on a server... unlike many eSignature WordPress add-ons (Gravity Forms, Formidable Pro, etc) our WordPress eSignature plugin does not save images but rather tracks the unique mouse strokes of the signature, we assign a unique serial number to that sequence of mouse strokes and encrypt it in your database (so it's not easily accessible).  If someone so much as alters one dot of a signers signature the Audit Trail serial number updates itself and will not match up with the serial number emailed to ALL signers at the time of signing their document.  If this were to happen you could prove in court that the document was tampered with.

SharesPost is both a broker/dealer as well as a fund for private company stocks. As a broker, they will match buyers with sellers. Sellers are typically employees who acquired their stock through exercising employee stock option grants or early investors. Buyers can be anybody but the main volume will be institutional investors including their affiliated fund. We at the http://www.EmployeeStockOptions.com fund transact hundreds of times per year in private company stocks on behalf of employees and find SharesPost to be a highly reputable intermediary for us on both the buy and sell-sides.

[full disclosure: I’m VP Digital Transformation at Solutions Notarius Inc., a company that supplies electronic and digital signature solutions]It completely depends on the requirements. I do not believe there is a uniquely better e-signature solution for all scenarios. For example, if the type of documents to be signed require low to medium reliability only, most modern e-signature platforms could be ok, subject to meeting legal requirements in the applicable jurisdiction, but if the document must meet stringent regulatory and statutory requirements that include high reliability of identity of signers, those platforms do not typically meet that threshold.Ideally, you would analyze, define and obtain agreement as to what constitutes the minimal acceptable legal reliability threshold you are willing to accept - or that readers of that document will accept. Next, define the technology requirements that correspond to that threshold. Finally, research e-signature options that meet these requirements and provide the best combination of price, features, scalability, etc..Finally, it should be noted that higher legal reliability e-signature platforms and solutions can always accommodate lower reliability documents while the converse is not true…

DMS (Document Management Systems) can be manual or electronic, though the electronic way of doing things has lots of advantages. An electronic DMS is based on document management software, which allows you to create and manage documents electronically, without the hassle of paperwork. With the wisely chosen DMS, you get a powerful PDF editor and a very comprehensive solution for keeping documents structured and organized. Such key features like OCR (text recognition), helps you to create a searchable copy in a storing system. Your business becomes more efficient with fillable forms and e-signatures. Team-managed accounts and storage clouds allow you to collaborate with ease and keep the files safe and secure for easy access from anywhere. A plethora of automated functions, like naming the files for example, save you hours and hours of office work. I recommend trying out Document 365 Business by Kdan Mobile, it’s a great document management solution that’s easy to use and intuitive as well. It works on all devices and platforms, and it will help you signNowly with the entire scope of your business projects.Disclaimer: I am part of Kdan’s team and my answers might be a bit biased.

Updating PAN card needs a lot of your patience, as the complete process takes usually around 30 days.The online process has put away some hassles but the manual process that goes behind seems to be still the same.Below are the steps that you should follow/keep in mind -Navigate to new NSDL PAN update interfaceFill-in the correct details. You can further refer to this link to fill out individual fields.There are several bugs in the form. Don’t get bewildered if you find something unusual happening in the form.Go for the paperless option, by selecting Aadhaar based e-Signature mode and upload all the required documents based on the changes that you want to be done.Once you are done filling up the application, do the final submission and the nominal payment of Rs.107, you will soon receive an acknowledgement mail. It might however take upto 2 days for the acknowledgement mail to hit your inbox.Keep your acknowledgement number and the PAN tracking URL handy, to keep a check on the processing status.You might encounter a shocker initially, when the status tracking says that they have not received the supporting documents and you need to send them physically within ‘X’ days. I was actually surprised, because according to the new process, if you have uploaded the soft copies of the supporting documents, then you don’t need to send any documents physically. So, do not panic, wait for few days for the status to change again, which will say something like - “Documents have been received and will be sent for verification”.Your PAN Card updation status will keep changing at regular intervals of 3–4 days. Hold your patience.After approximately 30 days, I just saw my updation request status turned to - “Your application for 'New PAN Card or/and Changes or Correction in PAN Data' has been accepted by the Income Tax Department. Your PAN Card will be dispatched to you shortly”. And now, I feel a bit relaxed.Still I expect it would further take around 7 days to finally receive the PAN Card and I would be one among the happiest guys.You can refer to the brief process which has been shared by NSDL at this link.Also, as Gopal Kavalireddi mentioned, you dont need to surrender your old PAN card. Keep it safe with you for your future references.

[full disclosure: I’m VP Digital Transformation at Solutions Notarius Inc., a company that supplies electronic and digital signature solutions]Great question. I perceive the biggest challenges in relation to electronic and digital signatures to be:Not understanding the function of a signature and therefore what e-signatures are. In the physical world, people intuitively understand what a signature is in its manuscript form, whereas in the electronic world, e-signatures encompass a much wider range of possible forms, from email signature blocks to voice recordings to secured online session date (when you click « I accept ») to images of manuscript signatures to cryptographically protected digital signatures. A signature is a permanent mark that is unique, exclusively used and traceable to a person and affixed on static information with implied or expressed intention. Everything in the electronic world that fulfils that function is a signature.Not understanding that e-signatures are a means to an end / that end is legal reliability. Whenever you are applying a signature to something, especially documents, it is to create evidence of a transaction. The degree to which that evidence will possess the following four reliability attributes will affect the probative value of the evidence: identity (certainty of the identity of signers), integrity (certainty of no undetected changes to document / information signed), authenticity (all that is required to prove identity and longevity is embedded in the document itself) and longevity (document or information signed can be opened, read and authenticated for at least its retention period).Not understanding that there is no such thing as “universally legally valid e-signatures”. People often ask “are electronic signatures legal and are they recognized by courts”? Ascertaining the legality of a form of signature calls for a 4 step analysis, always. First, what is the applicable jurisdiction for a specific or category of information / documents? Some contracts for example include a forum conveniens clause which make applicable the laws of a specific jurisdiction. Second, in that jurisdiction, what are the form requirements for signing those documents? Form requirements may include signing before a Commissioner of oaths and some statutes even prescribe the use of paper (!) in some cases. Third, absent specific form requirements, what is the general default legal regime that governs e-signatures for that type of documents in that jurisdiction? Fourth, is the e-signature solution you plan to use / have used will meet statutory functional requirements? So, in conclusion and from the previous 4 step analysis, it should be clear there cannot possibly be any e-signature solution that is universally legally valid for all types of documents in all jurisdictions.Administrative Adoption. When UNCITRAL e-commerce model laws where adopted worldwide in the period 1998–2008, it created a vexing situation where e-signatures were legal but not administratively adopted. Even if a statute proclaims as a general rule, for example, that “you cannot deprive of legal effect a document that is electronically signed solely on the basis that it is electronic”, administrations such as governments and banks, when they insist on receiving and processing paper documents, are maintaining a barrier to the adoption of e-signatures that e-commerce statutes were supposed to help take down.Not understanding that e-signatures are not all equal when assessing reliability. To assess the reliability of a particular e-signature, one has to assess identity (is the identity of signers reliable? why?), integrity (are changes to the document correctly invaluable dating associated e-signatures? can the original document signed be retrieved notwithstanding changes?), authenticity (is all necessary information to prove identity and integrity embedded in the document - in which case the document is a proof; or not - in which case it is merely a commencement of proof) and longevity (is the document signed and preserved in a logical format - for example ISO 19005 PDF/A with PAdES LTV signatures) - that will ensure it remains readable and verifiable for as long as required?). The word of e-signatures, when it comes to understanding the range of reliability offered - or lack thereof! - is severally lacking in its general knowledge of what makes an e-signature reliable. For example, an signNow Self-Sign certificate that is auto-generated by a user is great for integrity but worthless for identity because the user can declare whatever identity they choose in the certificate.There are other problems and challenges of course but the above are top of mind challenges I see and encounter all the time.

The general concern around scanned PNGs, etc. is not if they are a signature -- they clearly can be -- but if a court will deem them the same as a written signature.  There is a legal safe harbor, the Federal E-SIGN Act that services like www.echosign.com are built around, that deem an electronic signature under federal and state law the same as a written signature.  PNGs and other systems, where both sides do not agree to an electronic signature, may not be deemed by a court to be the same as a written signature, adding ambiguity to the document and signature.

Building trust with technology isn’t quite as easy as falling backward into someone’s arms. Unless you have a technical background, cybersecurity can be difficult to grasp.Most people are comfortable with ink signatures, but it’s a common misconception that just because a document has been signed with ink, it’s safe, secure and valid. In fact, without physically meeting and talking with the signer.For example, if you’ve never seen the signer’s signature before, how do you know it is actually their signature? If you know what the signature is supposed to look like, how do you know the one in front of you wasn't forged? And if the signature is on the last page of a multi-page document, how do you know that something in the preceding pages was not altered after the document was signed?The reality of e-signatures – especially independent e-signatures, in which the evidence of their validity is embedded in the signed document – is that they are more trustworthy than traditional ink signatures.Offer Transparency and ControlIn the same way, building trust means providing all the facts. If signers have access to the entire signing process from a comprehensive audit trail, they’re able to keep close watch over their transaction and its process from identity authentication to opening and reviewing documents to signing.Use Trusted TechnologyPeople trust those who are trustworthy. Companies that use e-signature technology that goes above and beyond security requirements will naturally win over the trust.Educate DownstreamNo matter how many thousands of dollars e-signatures will save your company, for an e-signature solution to be successful at every level, you must educate everyone involved in the importance your e-signature provider places on security and independence.