Sign Presentation for Procurement Free

A procurement presentation in the context of airSlate SignNow refers to a detailed overview of how our eSigning and document management solutions can enhance procurement processes. It highlights the efficiencies gained by implementing our tools for faster approvals and secure signatures, making procurement transactions smoother and more reliable.

airSlate SignNow enhances procurement presentations by streamlining the document signing process. With features like templates and automated workflows, you can create professional presentations that showcase your procurement strategies quickly and effectively, reducing the time spent on manual tasks.

Key features for procurement professionals using airSlate SignNow include customizable templates, real-time collaboration, and secure cloud storage. These features facilitate the creation of informative procurement presentations and ensure seamless communication among stakeholders during the signing process.

Yes, airSlate SignNow can integrate with various procurement software solutions through APIs and third-party integrations. This capability allows you to manage your procurement presentations and documents efficiently without switching between platforms.

airSlate SignNow offers flexible pricing plans tailored to fit different business needs. Whether you are a small business or a large enterprise, you can find a plan that aligns with your budget while enabling you to create effective procurement presentations.

The benefits of using airSlate SignNow for procurement presentations include increased efficiency, cost savings, and improved collaboration. By digitizing the signing process, procurement teams can allocate more time toward strategic tasks, ultimately driving better results.

Absolutely. airSlate SignNow is designed to comply with industry standards and regulations governing procurement transactions. Our platform ensures that all eSignatures and workflows adhere to legal requirements, making it a trustworthy choice for your procurement presentations.

I am considering four types of investments (one is actually insurance) here. I earn around 1 Lac per month.CryptosI research on them and buy undervalued tokens. I would cap my investment to a maximum of 2.5–3 Lac here. I have already invested 1.6 which currently values at around 6 Lac. I expect them to rise to 20+ Lac by 2018 end.StocksI have analyzed over 300 stocks fundamentally. I have classified them into three categories. Portfolio Grade stocks (those who have given good returns in last 10 years and are fundamentally good companies) in which I would be investing continually and would not sell them until I see serious management/business issues.Momentum Grade stocks (those that can give good returns in the quarter), I would stay invested in them for a period of 3 months at least.These stocks usually would be 50% of short term investments.Potential Multibaggers that I consider less risky. 35% of the capital reserved for short term investments would go into it. I may hold them for at least one year unless there occurs some serious business concerns.Risky multibaggers/Turn around Stocks. Yes, because I want to face some loss to verify my researches. They may also give gain. Remaining capital for short term investments would go into this.I would re-balancing last three categories every quarter.I have also made a list of few penny stocks (usually less than Rs. 10). I will allot a small amount to them and leave them to grow. It is highly risky but I already consider that money as lost.Mutual FundsI do a SIP of Rs. 18000 per month. It is diversified into three categories.Rs. 6000 in small cap, Rs. 6000 in ELSS and Rs. 6000 in Large Cap/Diversified equity funds.Also, in case of market falls considerably, I would be investing lump sum amounts in consistently performing equity funds. I have not set any amount for it. It would depend upon availability of free cash. Once these lump sum investments signNow 5–10 Lac, I would reduce the burden of SIPs, break a few funds, may take a small loan or withdraw from PF and would consider buying a home. I think I could meet this target in 10 years.I will buy a term insurance cover of 2 Crores.Lastly, I would be investing a lot of time in books. I aim to read 50+ non fiction books every year. I started late this year (in May) and have completed 30. I mostly read on economics, politics, human evolution, biographies/autobiographies, theology and technology.EditSomeone in the comments asked me about income. He told me it would be too much and seems impossible. First of all, its an investment strategy. May be I would not be able to invest so much. Secondly, the answer was written with a view that wealth building is possible even if your monthly income is low. It is all about your spending habits.I earn around 110K(thousand) per month. I divide it like this:10K - Rent and Electricity Bill3K - Ration and Vegetables (Advantage of living in shared apartment)1.5K - Maid for cooking and cleaning0.5K - Internet0K - For commute Since my company provides Uber for Business for free./0.3K - Mobile Bill per month1.0K - Food/Snacks in office3K - other household expenses on average basisThis leaves me with around 90K per month for investment. I divide it as:18K SIP (Mutual Fund SIP part achieved)10K Personal Loan EMI (I took it when I was captivated by consumerism, it will reduce as I will end the loan once for all) and Credit Card bills10K Cryptos(which would reduce down the line because I invested in a few ICOs, recently electroneum gave me a profit of around $1000. I guess I would not have to put any money further to it. Still, I am considering. Crypto part achieved.)40K each month to savings account.12K Variable (Utilized for traveling or other purposes)Now, lets analyze various investments.Cryptos - I think I have already explained about it.Stocks - Every quarter I would have around 160K in hand. Let’s say I put 100K in Portfolio Grade Stocks every second quarter.And once I have put 50K in momentum grade stocks, 35K in potential multibaggers and 15K in risky multibaggers(which I have already done). This money would be rebalanced so no further investment or only a small amount is drawn for further investments to it.Penny stocks. Let’s say I have identified 6 penny stocks and average cost per stock is Rs. 10. Consider I have bought 1000 stocks of each. Total one time investment is around 60,000. (I have already procured half of it)Mutual funds - I think i am clear about SIP part. Now the 160K I have at disposal for two quarters in a year. 100K goes as lump sum amount.Since, I leave 60K every quarter in my account I can easily pay one time in year the premium for term insurance which amount to around 32K.Let’s consider these investments for three years considering no increase in my salary. I am taking this time duration since I may not marry in these 3 years.I have invested 2.5–3 Lac in cryptos. (I guess no further investments)Around 6 Lac in portfolio grade stocks. (Will keep buying)Around 6 Lac in mutual funds as lump sum. (I guess I would invest for two more years)Around 6.5 Lac in mutual funds as SIP.Still, I would have 6 Lac cash in hand. (A part of this money may be further utilized for investments, unforeseen expenses that may come)Since, it depends upon market and other things. These figures are only an approximation. A few may be more. A few may be less. But, I guess except for the crypto all would be greater because personal loan(5.5K/Month) will die soon. Also, if I get a hike of 10%(around 11K). I would increase SIP by 5K. Rest amount would be adjusted to inflation and for procuring more comforts in life.I guess I have answered the person’s doubts clearly and he would be satisfied.Edit:For people who want to know about my stocks portfolio can find it here:Stocks Portfolio by Arjit Agarwal on Experiments, Experiences and EccentricitiesEdit 2:A few people mentioned their concerns regarding raids on exchanges by IT Department. Although, I cannot say in its exactness. But, if you have seen the movie Special 26, you should not get worried unless you have been engaged in evading taxes. In fact, I see it as a positive sign because Government may regulate exchanges and you don’t have to worry about run away of exchanges.The Government is not bad. We have a tendency to have negative feelings about our bosses, our government and sometimes our parents and teachers too. This is human nature as I have seen my colleagues criticizing our manager who was actually very good in his work and a very fine person.Also, Indian news channels present news in a very exaggerated form. Exaggeration hides truth and causes chaos. Income Tax Notices does not mean that your wealth is confiscated. It simply means there is some discrepancy in the taxes one has paid and one should have paid. It is more of a request notice from government to pay taxes or explain non-payment of taxes.Edit 3:Every month I would be participating in one ICO (Intital Coin Offering). All my ICOs for now have performed well and have given more than 10x returns.

It was apparent when President Trump was campaigning for the Presidency of the United States, that he was not like any candidate in recent history. He would at one point openly mock an Indian Accent and begin to describe his experiences with a call center in regard to one of his credit cards. Of course such stereotyping of Indians can be common in the U.S. and I have heard far more than my fair share during my life. But, even so I was startled that even the last vestiges of “Political Correctness” for many minorities simply was no longer important. The crowd would cheer at this mocking tone, and then some months later he would be elected by the electoral college as the President Elect. Race relations in the U.S. had actually been on a downward spiral even under President Obama, as his presidency which was about bringing change, but instead ended with even more incarcerated minorities than even before. U.S. foreign policies also had largely failed to get anywhere meaningful with two of the world’s most important rising economies, India and China.January 2015, Delhi India.President Obama had been invited to India to sit for the Republic Day Celebrations in Delhi, India. Many in India were reluctant to have a U.S. President for this, as he would mark a distinct tilt towards the U.S. after decades of India’s primary foreign policy being directed at demonstrating the importance of non-aligned cooperation and later Russian reliant defense procurement. Yet here President Obama would squander the meeting by stating upon return to the U.S. that India was a land of “religious intolerance”. This comment did not go over so well in India. Thus, when Trump came to the Presidency many in India were optimistic about what possibilities could be opened. These expectations would not have to wait long to be squashed as Trump carried out what he had talked about.Indian Software Engineer Srinivas Kuchibhotla, was murdered in a racial attack in Kansas in 2017.India would first feel the effect of having the software outsourcing business to be greatly restricted, it was already an industry on the decline due to cloud services. Thus, much of what Trump did by restricting the Visa policies in the U.S. was simply a case of accelerating change for Indian Companies. However his policies created an environment of racial tension as well. There would be several high profile attacks on Indian Americans. As his policies continued he pushed for India to “Correct” it’s trade imbalance with the U.S. Then he shifted to China, and began to unravel American-China trade which had increased every decade since China opened it’s economy in 1978. The amazing aspect was that by restricting trade and the travel of professionals, Trump only hurt the the U.S. economy in the long run. American corporations manufacture their products in China and in effect he made it harder for them to sell their items in the world. There would be exceptions made for companies such as Apple, but the damage was done. China began to decline in demand in respect to purchasing foreign luxury goods and other products. This impacted global growth rates not just the U.S.Prime Minister Modi and Chinese Leader XiAs these events took place in 2018, India and China which had improved relations since 2017 and the brief face off in the Himalayas, moved forward with trade and investments. This progress would be seen during the terrorist attack on India territory on February 14, 2019. For after India’s surgical attack in response to Pakistan's tacit support of Jaiesh E Mohammad, and China’s not labeling it’s head as a Terrorist, the action behind the scenes was anything but what was expected. China would dictate to Pakistan to tone down it’s response to India and to crackdown on terror. China’s role in deescalating the situation was a change from the past. Though it is likely that this will not change the general feelings of Indians to China which are based on the infringement of Indian territory in Kashmir, the current economic linkage is undeniably present. China is investing in India, and even though China remains a deficit producing entity for India on a Macroeconomic level, there is a benefit which has emerged that has not existed since the 1950’s for India. China has finally placed emphasis on maintaining peace in Asia; rather than supporting it’s traditional ally Pakistan. Thus, Pakistan may not count on Chinese assistance during a time of actual war and a similar situation like 1971 would most likely play out.The most telling sign of a paradigm shift is the level of diplomatic exchanges occurring on an ever more frequent basis. Trump has hit India once again by taking away duty free access for a multitude of Indian Products in the past few weeks. It seems now India and China are facing similar circumstances. There will be those who will wish to detract away from the progress being, and they have a legitimate standpoint as history shows a China which turned into an aggressor in 1962 and brutalized Tibet. Yet, this history is unlikely to repeat itself. The age of Mao is long over in China. Even hardcore communist part leaders are no longer drawn to his vision completely. Perhaps an even greater abandonment of his legacy has been the end of the one child policy. But, from the Indian perspective perhaps this was his greatest contribution to the current situation. For China has an aging population and it is extremely unlikely that it would risk the younger component of it’s work force for war. Thus even if we were to negate all else that has changed this enigma would be enough to prevent a land war where large numbers of personnel would be needed. From the Indian side, there simply is no comparing 1962 to the present. For India is today the world’s forth largest economy in PPI terms, and an atomic power. Regardless of how much more China spends on it’s military,India has a credible deterrence capability. The gap between India and China is closing economically in the next two decades. And at the end of the day, India represents a potential market unlike any other in the world. The population of India will exceed that of China in the near future. The potential which India represents has not been seen since the night time skies guided students from China to India before the year 1000, for nearly 1500 years Chinese students came to study in the world’s oldest universities which were in India. The future of peaceful coexistence for all of Asia rests on the future relationship between India and China. The period of the great interchange which lasted from 260 B.C. until the Islamic Invasions of India which began in 1000, represented histories longest peaceful exchange of knowledge between two ancient civilizations. It would see the transfer of Indian Buddhism, Indian Philosophy, mathematics and sciences to China. The genius of Ancient India would become a collective knowledge for all of Asia. It can only be imagined what is possible today if both nations can again harness their creativity in a similar harmony. For it was Deng Xiaoping who stated that the “Century of Asia will not be realized without the development of and co-operation between China and India”List of Popular & Latest Companies from the World | Times of IndiaU.S. Trade Snub Should Be Wake-Up Call for IndiaCan China, Russia and India work together for a fairer order?

I negotiate with a major software vendor on a full-time basis. I’m not going to try to invent an “unusual” strategy, because way too few of my customers (who are negotiating deals with the vendor I specialize in) have a grasp of what should be the “usual” strategies.I have to add that our strategy is not based on across-the-table relationships. My client is the customer, and my client hires me to define the best deal for them, not the vendor. I’m not looking for a win-win. I’m looking for a win. By my customer. If it’s a win for the vendor, I’m not offended, but that’s never my goal. If the vendor rep misses the deal and gets fired, that’s not my problem—I measure the result by my customer team’s success. Often the savings we realize save jobs at the customer’s site, so on the jobs front, we are doing just fine.I have, by the way, saved customers about $620 million over the last six years. I work every year with about a half-dozen Fortune 500/Global 2000 customers, plus a couple dozen smaller ones.Define your requirements. We spend 2 or 3 days at a customer’s site talking to relevant decision makers—what are their goals—and to technical implementers—what are they using today, when will they need more, etc. If you define your requirements and estimate what they should cost, you have set a “ceiling” on what you need to pay. This is known in classic negotiation strategy as “best alternative to a negotiated agreement” or BATNA. Because you have defined your needs carefully—and the vendor often has no idea what your real needs are—the vendor’s pitch is now invalid. The vendor team stuffs their proposal with their quota for the customer, their must-sell products, and the stuff they get bonuses for. You look at their offer, and strike out anything that doesn’t meet your requirements. Now you may be at 25% of what they were expecting to sell you.Always have a plan. In the thousands of meetings I have observed and participated in, one thing always sticks out: If only one person in the room has a plan, that’s the plan. By that I mean that you will spend the whole meeting discussing why or why not the vendor’s plan is a good plan, and no time considering alternative plans or approaches. The vendor never comes to a meeting without a presentation focused on what they want to sell. In response, the client must lay down on the table what they want to buy and do everything in their power, including ending the meeting early, to make that the plan. We’ve heard of smart negotiators who, after the vendor distributes handouts to members of the negotiating team and some managers, go around the room, gather up all the documents, and dump them in the recycle bin. Now, let’s start talking about our proposal.You control the schedule. My vendor always engages the customer months ahead of time with a calendar. Here’s when we’ll do the first introductions and overview (their PowerPoint, of course). They they’ll bring in the people who sell product X. Next, the people who sell service Y. They we will finalize the program and estimate costs. They we will get financial approval. Then the agreement will be complete and signed. Throw that out. Only you will decide when meetings are held. Only you will decide who attends meetings. Only you will decide what the agenda is. They’re free to tell you what they would like to talk about, but whether it makes the agenda or not is up to you. Never, ever let the vendor dictate who may or may not be in the room. One time the vendor rep told my customer that one of the customer’s staff would not be invited to future meetings. (He was constantly challenging the vendor with his own knowledge, and if there’s anything the vendor fears, it’s knowledgeable customers). I told the customer that they should make this employee a required attendee for all future meetings—now that the vendor had identified someone they feared, we’re going to put that fear in the room every time.Prepare the agreement that you will sign, independently of anything the vendor is offering. This is important for procurement/purchasing because the vendor will try to go over the negotiator’s head and get to senior management if they can’t crack the negotiator. If you, the negotiator, aren’t bending, the vendor will complain to upper management that the deadline is approaching and they still don’t have a deal. Your manager calls down, says “what’s going on, we need this done!” You say “I have the contract we will sign sitting on my desk. They had it two weeks ago. Anytime they want to sign this contract I will personally courier it to them for signature. It has gone through legal, it has the approval of our team. They may not want to sign it, but it is simply not true that we don’t have a contract ready for signature. It’s the vendor who is stalling, not us.”Manage upward. Make sure that senior people know what you are doing. They don’t want details, but keep them informed about your cost estimates (“we estimate that we should be able to get everything we need for $9.2 million”) and any vendor demands that are blocking signature. You want management to push any issues back to the negotiating team. Management should tell the vendor “you have raised some interesting issues. I trust my negotiating team to take all this into account, so bring that up with them and if they see it your way I’ll approve it.”Make all problems the vendor’s problem. One of my customers at one point said “Our back is against the wall. We need four weeks for contract approval, so we only have two weeks left to finalize the contract.” I told him “your back is never against the wall. We’re going to tell the vendor that we need to see their best and final offer one week from today. If they can’t make that, we’ll execute our contract plan” (which requires only putting in an order with a reseller). That worked perfectly. The vendor, of course, begged for a few more days, but in the end, the customer wrote the deal and met their deadline. So deadlines, budgets, special Ts and Cs , etc. that you need can all be turned into something the vendor needs to do or supply.Negotiate quantity or functionality rather than price. Way too many people wait for a vendor proposal and then try to talk it down 10% or 15%. They may end up with really good pricing for something they don’t need. That’s not a 15% discount. That’s 85% more than they needed to spend. We never negotiate discounts directly. By determining actual requirements we typically come in at 25% to 40% of what the vendor is proposing—and we base that on list prices. I call it “writing your own discount.” In these situations, we have “discounted” the customer’s costs by 60% to 75%. Furthermore, we often still end up with great price discounts. How? The vendor account team really, really needs to squeeze some quota or some must-sells into the deal. So they discount the price of everything else to squeeze their stuff under the price ceiling. We’ve gotten our customers 50% price discounts that way, even though they are buying far less . Less product, bigger discount? That’s a real savings accelerator.Find the mole. The vendor may have some staff in your building to help with support, training, etc. These people are often spies and cultivate friendships with your staff. They sit in the company cafeteria and shoot the bull, but they are also gathering information about new initiatives, quantities, critical requirements, etc. They also try to cultivate staff who might reveal information about the customer’s negotiating team or strategy. We provide customers with a template to send to all employees who are in that position. Never disclose data. Never get excited about anything they show you. At best, “we’ll review that.” If vendor staff ever try to pry out information, inform the negotiating team. In some cases we recall or invalidate badges that let vendor staff enter and roam the building without an escort. Until this deal is over, they’ll be escorted everywhere. Often some of your staff may be compromised. They’ve drunk the Kool-Aid and they really really want the latest Cadillac version of the vendor’s product. They can disrupt negotiations by bringing up constant objections. On one hand, we want the customer’s staff to be able to back our negotiating position, so we listen to such objections and if they’re real we will accommodate them. But we will challenge the employee for a business justification if they say something like “we can’t live without the next version of the product.” Really? It’s not out yet. What’s in it that you need? In many cases they’re feeding you scuttlebutt, not facts.Never forget that you have the money. The vendor wants it. If they don’t put the right deal on the table, they walk away with nothing. You still have your money. Way too many customers feel cowed by the brand, size, and money of a major software vendor. In reality, the contest is only between you and the vendor rep. The rep desperately needs your money to keep his or her job. When the vendor starts dictating to the customer, the wrong dynamic is set up. Push back, strong. They may act like you owe them, but you don’t. They owe you an appropriately sized contract to meet your requirements. “Here is the budget. Here are our requirements. Meet them and you get the money.”NB. Edited 6/16 to change “way too many” in the first paragraph to “way too few”PD

I'll speak to my specific experiences and leave it to you to decide how generalizable they are.Our company sells Enterprise Service Bus technology, which is used by developers to either integrate existing systems in the enterprise (and with external partners) or to serve as the infrastructure for a larger distributed system - often both. Our competitors include some of biggest names - IBM, Oracle, Microsoft.So, how is it that we've been able to get into enterprise customers like Bank of America, Dell, United, and others?Bottom-up and out.We make a technology that our end users (developers) love and we have a pricing model that enables them to use us at low scale for a low cost - meaning that they usually don't need to go up to the CIO for approval. We also have a very simple and lightweight deployment model so they don't end up tripping over the central IT department. (Side note - this is very similar to SaaS models, but our technology is primarily used on-premise by enterprises, though we do have a cloud model too).Once those developers succeed on that first project, they then introduce our technology into other projects and then other developers in the company are exposed to it and slowly fall in love with it too. I'm told that that's "viral" (a good thing).Yes, this process can take years but it doesn't require expensive salespeople flying around and, most importantly, it generates revenue and profit all the way through. That's really important when you're bootstrapping your company without any VC funding.Eventually (or not), word spreads far enough in the company that the CIO hears about us and signNowes out to us to talk about a more formal arrangement - getting an "all you can eat" enterprise license with 24x7 support, etc. At that point in time, we're not trying to "sell" in the traditional sense - yes, it is a negotiation, but the technology is already deployed and used. Most of the big obstacles to an enterprise sale have already been dealt with.To summarize, I guess my recommendation would be to take the "enterprise software" you're trying to sell and create a meaningful value proposition at much smaller scales and see how you can attract the end users to be your champions.I don't want to take credit here - I came to this model totally by accident and without any real forethought that this is how it should be done, or whether it would even work. Truth be told, I don't know that this model will continue to work and for how long. Like I said at the top of this post - this is just the story of my experiences. How well this would work in other cases - I wouldn't know to say.This is my first answer on Quora so I hope that it's contributed something here.

The simplest place to start is that Voter ID laws have an impact on the outcome of an election. People who are engaged in society almost all have a legal form of ID, and they skew Republican compared to people who are living off the grid for any of several reasons, who generally skew Democratic. Though there have been exceptions, with 2008 being the best and most recent example, Republicans tend to be more likely to vote than Democrats. Even in states where there is no voter id law, this is an undisputed fact on the ground. It's an old not-joke that Republicans love to see bad weather on Election Day, because it makes a Republican win slightly more likely. Polls of all registered voters usually show Democrats two or even more percentage points ahead of where they appear if the poll is of likely voters.Republicans like democracy. The question is whether it is defined as rule by a majority of all citizens, or by a majority of those who cast a vote. Obviously what a Republican would like to see is that every eligible voter in the country would register, educate themselves, and come out and cast a Republican vote. Even if they could get away with it, which they plainly could not, Republicans do not want to win elections by manipulating the outcome. They have a partisan motive to suppress turnout, and when they've been found guilty of doing that, they often end up literally behind bars. Republicans obviously do not have a partisan motive to increase general turnout.It would seem that both parties could agree on any system that allows every voter an equal opportunity to cast a legal vote. But there is no such system. The Republican will say that we have a system that is easy enough, and makes it possible for anybody who wants to do so to cast a vote. The Democrat will say that low turnout is proof that it wasn't easy enough. When it comes to balancing expense versus achieving universal voting, Republicans have a political motive to remove obvious obstacles and then let the people who want to vote cast their votes. It is equally partisan to suggest an extreme on the other end; we could conduct elections much more like the way we do a census; we could hire millions of people to go to their houses and collect their opinion, whether they had any interest in providing it or not. It would come closer to the ideal of democracy.We spend money running elections. We could install more voting machines in more voting locations, and boost turnout slightly. The cost would be high. At some point surely even someone who is dedicated to the notion that every citizen should vote will perceive a crossover point at which collecting more votes is not worth the cost. But it seems inevitable that a small government party will come into conflict on this issue when debating with a party that will directly benefit from more spending.With no voter id law whatsoever, it's harder to vote if you're poor. It is also harder to eat well and harder to get a good education and harder to get to work. All are rights that we want to work very hard to guarantee to every American. But we can't make it equally easy for poor people to do much of anything - your life isn't equal to prosperous citizens when you don't have any money. As of today, almost all Americans can request an absentee ballot by telephone, fill it out, mail it in, and have their vote counted. I am unaware of laws that require forms of ID that are expensive to obtain. I would like to learn more. It is my understanding that voter id laws include provisions to make the process of obtaining an ID no more difficult than voting itself.And a word about racism follows.A hundred years ago in many areas of this country you could legally discriminate on the basis of color. (Obviously you could do that much more recently, as well: I myself went to a legally all-white school as a first grader. I am that old.) Later, you could charge a poll tax. As a shameful but interesting bit of ephemera from the elections of years past, I have a poll tax receipt signed by my grandfather in 1932. The poll tax was $1.00, and that was a sufficiently high fee to prevent most African Americans from voting. The question now is whether the cost of an ID card is high enough that it prevents many minorities from casting a vote. Because of a legacy of centuries of racial discrimination, anything that impacts the poor impacts a higher percentage of minorities than whites. However, in any given income bracket, whites make up the majority. A policy that adversely affects the poor affects more white people than black people. This math isn't difficult, but it means that disproportionate impacts on African Americans are also primarily visited upon whites. If I had a political strategy that called for reducing black votes and getting white votes, a poll tax (or any poverty-driven mechanism) would be illogical in the extreme. Those who try to make a case that Republicans are in favor of laws that do not maximize the turnout of poor voters have an argument, because more government money could pay for more mechanisms to gather votes. Those who try to make an argument that Republicans are in favor of laws that are aimed at hurting minorities are at best mistaken, completely and utterly. If they have signNowed this conclusion without thinking through the math, they are expressing a valid concern that has to be discussed and addressed. If they are saying that the voter id laws are racially motivated even though they understand the math, and are merely asserting this accusation because it is damaging to the Republican Party, they are engaging in a common form of partisan politicking. In this case, it strikes me as being far out of bounds, both because it ascribes completely unacceptable moral qualities to Republicans with no evidence, and because it serves to shed heat on the discussion instead of light. It is demagoguery, and I condemn it in the strongest terms I know how to express politely.

Unless you sign an exclusive agency agreement you are free to use whichever real estate professional you choose. You might end up owing both real estate professionals a fee though. Compensation can come from the tenant, landlord or a combination of the two. This falls under procuring cause. Which real estate professional brought you to the table vs. the one who got you to sign on the dotted line. It’s a frequent cause of contention between real estate professionals. Depending on how the compensation is structured each could get 1/2 a fee or fight over 100%.If the real estate professional that showed it to you works for the owner they may have an office policy where a tenants agent must be present for all showings to earn compensation. Others who rely on the tenant paying for their own representation fully just leave it to the tenant and their agent(s) to straighten out. Their concern would be if you could still be able to pay the rent as expected.You should discuss your reasons with the agent that showed you the property and figure out a course of action to satisfy everyone. Perhaps you offer the agent you don’t want to use a few hundred dollars for their time (depends on how many properties they showed you). If it’s just you prefer the other and not the showing agent who didn’t do anything wrong an offer of a glowing recommendation on a real estate site is quite valuable. The showing agent has to split any fee (paid to their office/brokerage) with their office. They can’t accept cash directly unless they are the broker of record for their office.

When government landed with this demonitisation people becoming smarter. The cunning and cruel Mind will giving you lot of ideas.People buying gold after listening news of demonitisation. Only a shop in andhrapradesh recorded sales of ₹300 crores In 4 days. Thinking where people had all these money. As there is already a rule that you should submit pan card on buying gold but no one submitted that and After this demonitisation income tax officers has started their raids on gold shops and seized them.and even the people who bought the gold are also given notices after this demonitisationSo people left this option and become some more smarter and using Jan dhan accounts to deposit their black money. and government observes a huge cash is depositing in to Jan dhan accounts. will they leave them noSo people coming with some more options they consulting brokers and getting their work done. but they charging high amount of commission say 35%. So people are thinking something is better than nothing . and consulting brokers. what government did you may aware of Indias biggest block buster movie baahubali income tax officers called to the producers and acted like brokers and assured them to change their black money they believed them and went to the place where they said, a sudden shock for them income tax officers seized 60 crores of cash. not only producers all the bigshots felt in move made by officers .People again don't left their hope exchanging their 500 and 1000s in temple and they are changing their cash in to smaller denominatons of 100 s and 50 s that is the place only where you can get a lot of change. but if in case of large amount the temples also can't provide you the change so it's only restricted to small amounts.And people booking train tickets of higher cost and later on cancelling it. So they amount can be given back to them in lower denominations. what government did they maked a rule train tickets which has been cancelled and amount is more than 10,000 the amount will be directly refunding to their accounts so you should give an account for that.Cruel Mind doesn't stop thinking of ideas came up with a new one.giving money to the needy and they should return money to them after 6 months no interest,no agreement, just go and take the money. If you don't return the money he can't do anything in legal way. But he may threaten him and get back his money.So came up with an new idea paying advance salaries to the staff so they can get rid of their black money.The demonitisation helped local government a lot and government provided an option they can pay their dues and advances to the government with the old notes and this option is given only to the individuals and hufs not to the corporates. So people goes and pays land tax dues and advances electricity dues and advances. They don't know that government will extract this record too and send them notices.So we can observe people are using several ways and government giving them a stroke in every way possiblySo no one can stop the development of india now.Good days are ahead

Hi...The Sales Funnel is a customer-focused marketing model which illustrates the theoretical customer journey towards the purchase of a product or service. An example of sales or customer funnelThis staged process is summarized below:Awareness – the customer is aware of the existence of a product or serviceInterest – actively expressing an interest in a product groupDesire – aspiring to a particular brand or productAction – taking the next step towards purchasing the chosen productThe Sales Funnel is also often referred to as the “customer funnel”, “marketing funnel”, “purchase funnel” or ...