Request eSignature Word Free
Make the most out of your eSignature workflows with airSlate SignNow
Extensive suite of eSignature tools
Robust integration and API capabilities
Advanced security and compliance
Various collaboration tools
Enjoyable and stress-free signing experience
Extensive support
How To Add Sign in eSignPay
Keep your eSignature workflows on track
Our user reviews speak for themselves
Request eSignature Word Free. Explore by far the most user-pleasant knowledge of airSlate SignNow. Deal with your complete record processing and discussing method electronically. Change from handheld, document-dependent and erroneous workflows to automatic, computerized and perfect. It is simple to create, supply and indicator any files on any system anyplace. Make sure that your important business circumstances don't move over the top.
See how to Request eSignature Word Free. Follow the simple information to begin:
- Make your airSlate SignNow account in mouse clicks or sign in along with your Facebook or Google profile.
- Take pleasure in the 30-day time free trial or go with a rates program that's excellent for you.
- Find any legal format, construct on the internet fillable varieties and reveal them securely.
- Use advanced functions to Request eSignature Word Free.
- Signal, modify signing order and acquire in-particular person signatures 10 times quicker.
- Set automatic reminders and acquire notifications at every step.
Relocating your duties into airSlate SignNow is straightforward. What follows is an easy procedure to Request eSignature Word Free, as well as suggestions to maintain your co-workers and companions for much better alliance. Inspire your staff with all the best tools to stay along with organization functions. Boost productiveness and range your small business faster.
How it works
Rate your experience
-
Best ROI. Our customers achieve an average 7x ROI within the first six months.
-
Scales with your use cases. From SMBs to mid-market, airSlate SignNow delivers results for businesses of all sizes.
-
Intuitive UI and API. Sign and send documents from your apps in minutes.
A smarter way to work: —how to industry sign banking integrate
FAQs
-
How can email deliverability be improved?
Your email deliverability rates are affected by a few main factors:The origin of the email.Your reputation as a sender.The content of your email.The frequency of your emails.Whether your IP is blacklisted.Your email’s format and content.Your subscribers’ engagement with your emails.Subscriber complaints.However, this is a very simplified version, let’s dive deeper.Build your sender reputationRemember, strong sender reputation takes a long time to build it can also be diminished from one day to the other.Choose the right email service providerChoosing the right email service provider for your business can have a big impact on your business, especially because an improved deliverability rate can mean increased profitability and higher ROI for your campaigns.At Platformly we constantly monitor our sender reputation and ensure that our deliverability rates stay on par or above industry standards.Ensure your email contacts are verifiedEnsuring that all your email contacts are updated and verified results in higher open and click through rates.Setup your sender authentificationEmail authentication is a way for you as a domain owner to ensure your domain meets security standards and protects your subscribers as well as your brand from malicious attacks and impersonation.Comply with local laws and regulationsLaws like CAN-SPAM in the USA, CASL in Canada and the GDPR in the EU regulate how businesses can use email for commercial purposes.Non-compliance not only hurts your deliverability rates but it can also result in hefty fines with your brand’s reputation suffering long term.Ensure you are not blacklistedIf you are experiencing deliverability issues it’s best to check and monitor if your IP is on a blacklist. Blacklists will list your domain or sender IP if you receive a lot of spam complaints. Many ISPs take this into consideration when evaluating your emails.There are many other tips on how to improve your email deliverability, check this ultimate guide to learn more: Email Deliverability: The Complete Guide to Owning the Inbox
-
What is a good buildup for a sales e-mail?
As Arek puts it, try and not to do hard selling. One way to avoid this is to ensure that you connect with the person you’re sending the message to. You need to sync with their emotion and tap on their goals and pains.Imagine you’re the receiver of the email: how would you react to a standard sales email detailing product specs and prices? Most likely you’ll ignore them (I’m sure I do) because they’re just that--a generic sales email. For a random consumer, what it says is just “Buy Me! Buy Me!” with no regards if it’s relevant to the receiver.To make a good sales email, you need to tell the receiver things that they care about and not things about your product which they could not be familiar with in the first place. Tell them how your product could address the problems they’re facing. Give them a reason to open your message. Here are two of the most crucial things to remember before drafting that message.Make a prospect listThe results you get from your emails don’t just depend on the quality of emails you send but most importantly on the quality of your leads. Low-quality lead lists waste your time and energy, resulting in countless mail delivery failure notifications.In order for you to get a good list, you would need to do prospecting by utilizing prospecting tools. There is LinkedIn where you could find targeted leads through a thorough search feature. You can find them through industry, company, or through mutuals. This is a great place to find people that are most likely to purchase your product or service.Keep your emails short and straight forwardThere is no single way to stand out from the crowd. However, the best thing you can do is optimize your email so that your prospects get what you want you to say in a couple of seconds. Grab their attention quickly. The purpose of your email has to be easily understood within moments of opening the email.Many pros make the mistake of sending a jam-packed email with all the features listed in bullet form. Not only is this salesy, it also shows laziness. Prospects like knowing that you took the time to research them before sending them a messaging.You can read more on writing sales emails and other best sales practices in this ebook, Top 100 Sales Influencers.
-
What is the best CRM for real estate agents? Must have integration with Google Contacts and Calendar and document management. It
The Best Real Estate& Marketing CRM is Zricks.comGlobal World Class NetworkJoin a committed group of real estate professionals (Agents, Freelancers, Builders and Developers) across India. Our comprehensive presence enables us to provide our partners with a unique combination of extensive global resources, network and technical expertise.CRM Support/DasboardEasy access to user-friendly Zricks Online CRM Dashboard. Monitor business performance, Leads Managment, Follow ups & Reports.Add, Capture & Manage LeadsCapture Leads on your Profile or Properties listed on our property portal. Get Email and SMS notifications simultaneously for every lead received on all your live inventories. Never miss any Lead or Sales Enquiries.Add & Filter Follow UpsAdd, Manage & Filter out your Leads with pre-defined follow ups in Zricks CRM Software. Keep track of your important leads which are on Calls and Site Visits through Follow-ups.Live your Inventory & Post unlimited property listings for FREEList unlimited residential and commercial properties for Sale/Rent. Post your Customer's property & save their confidential info in your account.Manage InventoryManage & Filter out your Inventory in CRM with pre-defined follow ups.Automated Matching between Leads & InventoryOffering faster conversion by Matching potential leads with property listings.Live your Customer's RequirementsShare & Post your Customer's requirements in Zricks CRM and Marketing Platform.TransparencyOur Real Estate CRM Support provides real time tracking of customer interactions and lead management. A complete tranparency is maintained from lead generation to lead conversion.Higher ProfitabilityEngage with your customers and manage potential customer relations through our user friendly CRM. Access to exclusive property deals & Offers right into Zricks CRM. Higher firm productivity leads to higher profitability.Syndicate your ListingsAuto push your property listings to international property platforms like Nestoria, Trovit, Mitula etc. in order to get maximum visibility and generate more verified and quality leads.Reports, Trends, Analytics & StatsLive MIS Performance tracking and reporting of leads and properties. Monitor real time activities right from your Zricks CRM Dashboard. Getting organised, systematic and consistent in customer follow-ups will help in closing more deals or transactions efficiently through us.Visit: Zricks.com
-
As a startup founder of three years our legal housekeeping is a bit of mess, how can I best setup a system to organize and track
As a startup founder of three years myself, I can relate to how legal housekeeping can be messy. Once a year, I have our own lawyers go through and do an audit of all of our legal paperwork (which costs a couple thousand dollars to be extremely thorough, but it’s worth it). Luckily, there are now many ways to easily manage and track all of your legal, financial, and HR documents via third-party sites that specialize in these management proceedings. I wrote a blog post about this awhile back titled “5 Ways to Save Time Dealing With Documents” which highlights certain sites that can be very beneficial depending on what paperwork you’d like to track or manage. They are as follows:1. GroupDocsGroupDocs is a new, comprehensive online service for document creation and management. It has multiple features, including a viewer for reading documents in your browser, an electronic signature service, an online document converter, a document assembly service, a feature for comparing different versions of a document, and an annotation feature. An individual plan is $10 per month for limited storage and 500 documents, while a group plan for up to 9 people is $19 per user per month. Based on the number of features and pricing, GroupDoc is a good-value purchase for a small business. As you’ll see below, GroupDocs can be cheaper than a service that offers only one such feature.2. signNowWhen you’re closing a deal and need to get documents signed, the last thing you need is a slow turnaround due to fax machine problems or the postal service. The solution is to use an electronic signature service such as signNow, which is one of the most popular e-signature companies in the world. This service allows you to email your documents to the person whose signature you need. Next, the recipient undergoes a simply e-signing process, and then signNow alerts you when the process is completed. Finally, signNow electronically stores the documents, which are accessible at any time. As a result, you can easily track the progress of the signature process and create an audit trail of your documents. The “Professional” plan is recommended for sole proprietors and freelancers, and costs $180 per year ($15 per month) for up to 50 requested signatures per month. The “Workgroup” plan is geared towards teams and businesses, and it costs $240 per user per year ($20 per month per user), for unlimited requested signatures.3. signNowsignNow is another e-signature service. Similar to signNow, signNow allows you to upload a PDF file, MS Word file or web application document. Next, you can edit the document, such as by adding initials boxes or tabs, and then email them out for signatures. Once recipients e-sign the document, signNow notifies you and archives the document. signNow offers low rates for these services: a 1-person annual plan with unlimited document sending costs $11 per month. An annual plan for 10 senders with unlimited document sending costs only $39 per month.4. ExariExari is a document assembly and contract management service that assists in automating high-volume business documents, such as sales agreements or NDAs. First, the document assembly service allows authors to create automated document templates. No technical knowledge is required; most authors are business analysts and lawyers. Authors have a variety of options for customizing documents, such as fill-in-the-blank fields, optional clauses, and dynamic updating of topic headings. They also can add questions that the end user must answer. Once you send out the document, the user answers the questionnaire, and Exari uses that data to customize the document. Next, the contract management feature allows you to store and track both the templates and the signed documents. Pricing is based on the size and scope of your planned implementation, so visit their website for more information.5. FillanyPDFIt’s a hassle having to print out PDF forms in order to complete them. Fortunately, FillanyPDF is a service that allows you to edit, fill out and send any PDFs, while entirely online. This “Fill & Sign” plan costs $5 per month, or $50 per year. If you subscribe to the “Professional” plan, you can also create fillable PDFs using your own documents. With this service, any PDF, JPG or GIF file becomes fillable when you upload it to the site. You can modify a form using white-out, redaction and drawing tools. Then, you can email a link to your users, who can fill out and e-sign your form on the website. FillanyPDF also allows you to track who filled out your forms, and no downloads are necessary to access these services. The “Professional” plan costs $49 per month, or $490 per year.Switching firms can be a hassle. As a former startup attorney, I have a bit of advice about finding the right attorney for your business: it’s best to focus on the specific attorney you’ll be working with. He or she should have a solid understanding of the ins and outs of your business industry, a deep knowledge of the legal issues your startup may face, and previous work experience with startups to ensure a quality and efficient work product. This is absolutely key when matching our startup clients at UpCounsel to attorneys on our platform who can perform their legal work and hash out their legal projects in a timely manner. We also allow clients to store any and all of their legal documents directly on UpCounsel so they don’t have to go searching in alternative places for the correct paperwork. It’s proven to be a free and lightweight way to store legal documents that our clients love. Here's what it looks like:As I’ve mentioned, it’s more important to find the right attorney as opposed to the right law firm. And seeing as you’re a startup, our own startup clients typically save an average of 50-60% on their legal work, since the attorneys don't include overhead fees (a.k.a. the fees included for doing business with the firm itself) in their invoices.Hope this gives you a deeper look into what other sites and services are out there. If you have any questions or would like more information on how best to handle your legal housekeeping/ attorney matters, feel free to signNow out to me directly. As a former startup attorney at Latham & Watkins, I’d be happy to give you some guidance.
-
How do I make my digital signature for signing a document?
In-order to obtain Digital Signature [ https://business.sify.com/services/digital-certificate ] one must apply it from an issuer. Below are a few steps to get a Digital Signature Step 1. You need to acquire the DSC(Digital Signature Certificate) [ https://business.sify.com/services/digital-certificate ] application form from sify and fill it, you also need to mention the type of entity for which you want to apply DSC for. Applicant Choice Usage Type (Drop down) MCA Efilling, Income tax, E tender, Foreign Trade, Multipurpose, Others Class Type Class 2 or Class 3 or Document Signer User Type Individual or Organization Certificate Type Signature or Encryption or Both Certificate Validity 1,2,3 Years Back Up USB token (Sent to applicant address given by the applicant) Yes (Extra Charges) or No Applicant details Applicant details Name Gender DOB Address District Pin code State Country PAN Nationality Email Contact No If Organization (Additional) Company Name Department / Industry Step 2. Provide all the necessary documents such as address proof, identity proof Document Details Identification Document : PAN Card, Passport, Aadhar, Photo ID (MHA), Driving license, Photo Id issued by govt, Post office Id, Bank passbook with photo Identification Document No: Respective Doc No Address Proof Document Organization Type Proof : Partnership firm, Company, Proprietor, AOP/BOI,LLP,NGO/Trust (If user is an organization) (Attested) Step 3. All the document provided for address proof & identity proof must be attested by an attesting officer. Documents Validation The documents mentioned by the user are validated by the business in 2 ways: 1. Online - Using Aadhar number, user has to enter the Aadhar number and respective mobile number to get an OTP, he has to input the OTP on the website to get verified or validated (if users selects organization type, online using Aadhar card will not be available) 2. Offline – Where the user can courier the attested documents to Specified address mentioned (Mentioning the time frame for validating the same) (Attested : Self and Attesting officer) Attested by from Company Secretary OR Bank Manager OR Post Master OR Gazetted Officer OR Registration Authority . Only option for organization to get documents validated. Step 4. For payment, you can visit Sify - Digital Sales Portal and pay the necessary amount online. Payment / Delivery Post online verification of the documents the user is taken to payment gateway to make the payment (GST Details requested) using Paytm or Net banking or Credit cards. Once the payment is successful the admin team gets notified and delivers the credentials Final Confirmation The User account gets auto created along this process while filling the contact form. Confirmation email and sms sent to respective email id and mobile no mentioning the Unique Id, Login credentials, Payment details and Status
-
How did people feel after the fall of Rome?
In a way, it is correct to say that life went on as normal; which is not to say, of course, that there was anything normal about life at all, in those days and years and centuries.The Fall of the Western Roman Empire was a long agony, so we’d be best served by limiting our scope to the two most traumatic events: the sack of Rome by the Arian (non-Catholic Christian) Visigoths in 410 AD (800 exact years after Brennus’ Gauls) and the final collapse of Roman Italy in 476 AD (in Ravenna, capital of the Western Empire, Skirian (?) General Odoacer deposes his titular boss Romulus Augustus and crowns himself King of Italy and vassal of the Eastern Emperor); but first, a premise on the two very different sets of witnesses.The one cultural event monopolizing the debates of the era is the slow victory of Christianity over traditional Roman religion: the Romans of 410 had barely anything but blood in common with Scipio, Caesar or even Trajan. Not even the Latin language itself, as words irredeemably lost their old meaning: fides went from meaning “commitment”, “word of honor” (~besa) to “blind belief”; gratia went from “goodwill”, “friendliness” to “divine intervention”; persona went from “[theater] mask” to “human being” (replacing the usual homo with a very explicit metaphor on the emptiness of Man); damnatio went from “penal punitive measure” to “life failure”; a daemon went from being a “supernatural” force to a “supernaturally evil” one[1]; salus went from “deliverance” to “salvation” and then, in Medieval Romance, to “health”, through a process of normalization of Christian theological vocabulary; etc.[2] The “uneasy coexistence of Science and Faith” is a concept a Pagan Roman would have lacked the very words to formulate.One may of course dismiss this as an overly technical observation, but the fact is, upheavals this thorough are not normal in history: they are artificial, sustained interventions with a purpose, and as such are both cause and consequence of extremely unusual social circumstances — I’ve written about the Nazis’ kindred efforts, but the Soviets and other Communists acted in this direction too (eg. power — vlast’, pushtet, etc. — went on to mean “government”, and was normally used with that meaning by non-activists: putting yourself against “the System” meant putting yourself against Soviet Power, an almost metaphysical-sounding concept), and they were all following the logic expressed with dazzling clarity by George Orwell in a little gem, his scholarly appendix to 1948:“The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought — that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc — should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words. Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings and also the possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever. To give a single example. The word free still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be used in such statements as ‘This dog is free from lice’ or ‘This field is free from weeds’. It could not be used in its old sense of ‘politically free’ or ‘intellectually free’ since political and intellectual freedom no longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless.”— Appendix: The Principles of NewspeakThe Fall of the Western Empire intertwines with such and other (much larger, and longer) processes, of which it ends up constituting but a chapter.We think of the ruins, of course: those are what remains to speak on behalf of it all, the mere shell. But what about the men inhabiting those ruins — what was lost within men, before the walls even started giving in? Look at what is missing in the picture of a modern ruin.Not just language, lifestyle and hopes changed, but the very nature of thought down to what people consider obvious and what they don’t: matters of behavior, of ethics, of one’s knee-jerk ideas of “good” and “evil”; but also the deeper cosmological roots of people’s worldview: does time have a beginning? Is it a line going in one direction, or is it a disorderly succession of progress and regress, with no underlying “goal” or purpose, but with recurring patterns? Are our senses helping us or hindering us in making sense of the world? Do you get to the truth by adding or subtracting? Is knowledge a journey or is it the destination? Is what we live life, or is it a tricky, lying, dangerous prelude to life? The answers to these questions were so blatantly obvious to the man of the street before and after roughly the 3rd to 7th Centuries, but opposite answers to all the above questions would be given in those two eras. What happened during the centuries comprising the Fall of Rome was nothing short of the greatest Cultural Revolution in European history, and the contemporaries’ experience of the traumatizing, extremely unsettling and unpredictable geopolitical upheavals that riddled those years was obviously marked by the still-ongoing debate on the very foundations of life.It is indeed a conflict that has lost its dramatic poignancy to our eyes, and that we’ve grown used to see as a “frozen” horror at the root of the West, a mere footnote, perhaps: but the violence was no less than what tv newscasts from recent years might have shocked us with, and the stakes — much, much higher.One of the cardinal incidents from the time of these culture wars is the debate regarding the Altar to Victoria in the Roman Senate, in 384 AD — four years after the Edict of Thessalonica and twenty-six years before Alaric’s Sack of Rome — which started with Pagan praefectus urbis (“governor” of Rome) Symmachus’ plea with the Emperors Valentinian II (West) and Theodosius I (East) to restore the golden statue, which had presided over all Senate sessions since before the Punic Wars, until removed a few years earlier. In a mix of Roman Nationalism, allegiance to Imperial authority and earnest piety, Symmachus pleads:9. Romam nunc putemus assistere, atque his vobiscum agere sermonibus: “Optimi principes, patres patriae reveremini annos meos, in quos me pius ritus adduxit. Utar cerimoniis avitis; neque enim poenitet. Vivam meo more, quia libera sum. Hic cultus in leges meas orbem redegit: haec sacra Hannibalem a moenibus, a Capitolio Senonas repulerunt. Ad hoc ergo servata sum, ut longaeva reprehendar? Videro quod instituendum putatur; sera tamen et contumeliosa emendatio senectutis.”10. Ergo diis patriis, diis indigetibus pacem rogamus. Aequum est quidquid omnes colunt, unum putari. Eadem spectamus astra, commune coelum est, idem nos mundus involvit. Quid interest qua quisque prudentia verum requirat? Uno itinere non potest perveniri ad tam grande secretum. Sed haec otiosorum disputatio est: nunc preces, non certamina offerimus.——9. Let us now imagine that Rome herself were before you and addressed you in these words: “Excellent princes, fathers of the fatherland, respect my age, which my pious rites allowed me to signNow. Let me follow the ancestral ceremonies, for I do not repent of them. Let me live after my own fashion, for I am free. This worship subdued the world to my laws, these sacred rites kept Hannibal from the walls, and the Senones from the Capitol. Have I been saved to see this, to be reproached in my old age? I shall consider the nature of what is being proposed for adoption; but reproaching the elderly is untimely and arrogant.”10. Thus, we ask for the gods of our fathers and for the gods of the land to be afforded peace. It is fair to consider all that men worship as one same thing: we observe the same stars, one sky is above all of us, the same world involves us: what matters which wisdom we rely on, in our quest for truth? A single path cannot lead to solving such a grandiose mystery. But these are moot disquisitions: we are now offering prayers, not diatribes.[3]Far from being mere syncretism or relativism or oecumenic imperialism or missionaryism or the consequence of a Spermatikos Logos[4] (a concept best synthesized as “whatever they got right is ours, because they managed to catch a glimpse of our truth” — eg. check paragraph 12 here), the bolded sentence above is the expression of the Pagan trust in the evocative power of human research and memory, rather than revelation, which would in itself be shared by all men and thus common to all “natural” religions: I’ve touched upon this fundamental doctrine, known in its practical results as interpretatio, in an older answer of mine comparing the Greek god Ares with Roman Mars:We in the modern world are more used to the Abrahamic understanding of theological knowledge being revealed unto mankind by the deity through men temporarily inspired to repeat God’s very own words into a holy book: this is the principle that makes Abrahamic religions “exclusionary” (a much better label than “monotheistic”, as argued by prof. Jan Assmann [more on him below]); but ancient paganism saw the source of theological knowledge in men particularly sensitive to being possessed by Muses/Camenes/goddesses linked to a general, underlying Memory of the world, who dictated to their countrymen bits of deeper knowledge — and those could easily turn out to coincide with some parts of the neighboring culture’s imperfect knowledge of the foundations of the world (a common occurrence, since there usually were distant but shared Indo-European roots to European foreigners): since cosmology and theology were seen as ever-perfectable fields of inquiry, other cultures’ intuitions were welcome into your own knowledge, if the two were compatible — this is the principle underlying interpretatio.The newly-triumphant cult would have nothing of this, of course; more precisely, the new Abrahamic religion had a very hard time even conceiving of these premises — the gap between the two traditions’ outlook was simply too huge for bridges, and once you joined the new cult, you accepted an exclusive and jealous authority that made you grow very distant from the premise itself of Paganism.As soon as Symmachus’ plea was heard, Archbishop of Milan (and later Saint as well as modern Patron Saint of that city) Ambrose, who had great influence on the young Western Emperor, wrote him two letters as counterargument (epistulae 17, 18 — here in English), and his position eventually won.The first letter was written by an alarmed Ambrose before having a chance to read Symmachus’ plea:1. Cum omnes homines, qui sub dicione Romana sunt, vobis militent, imperatoribus terrarum atque principibus, tum ipsi vos omnipotenti deo et sacrae fidei militatis. Aliter enim salus tuta esse non poterit, nisi unusquisque deum verum, hoc est, deum Christianorum, a quo cuncta reguntur, veraciter colat; ipse enim solus verus est deus, qui intima mente veneretur: “Dii enim gentium daemonia”, sicut scriptura dicit.2. Huic igitur vero deo quisque militat et, qui intimo colendum recipit affectu, non dissimulationem, non conniventiam, sed fidei studium et devotionis inpendit. Postremo si non ista, consensum saltem aliquem non debet colendis idolis et profanis caerimoniarum cultibus exhibere. Nemo enim deum fallit, cui omnia etiam cordis occulta manifesta sunt.[…]6. Nullus obrepat iuniori aetati tuae! Sive ille gentilis est, qui ista deposcit, non debet mentem tuam vinculis suae superstitionis innectere, sed proprio studio docere et admonere te debet, quemadmodum verae fidei studere debeas, quando ille tanto motu veri vana defendit. Deferendum meritis clarorum virorum et ego suadeo, sed deum certum est omnibus praeferendum.7. Si de re militari est consulendum, debet exercitati in proeliis viri exspectari sententia, consilium conprobari, quando de religione tractatus est, deum cogita! Nullius iniuria est, cui deus omnipotens antefertur. Habet ille sententiam suam.[…]14. Quid respondebis sacerdoti dicenti tibi: Munera tua non quaerit ecclesia, quia templa gentilium muneribus adornasti? Ara Christi dona tua respuit, quoniam aram simulacris fecisti; vox enim tua, manus tua et subscriptio tua, opus est tuum. Obsequium tuum dominus Iesus recusat et respuit, quoniam idolis obsecutus es; dixit enim tibi: «Non potestis duobus dominis servire» (Matth. 6,24). Privilegia tua sacratae deo virgines non habent et vindicant virgines Vestae? Cur sacerdotes dei requiris, quibus petitiones profanas gentilium praetulisti? Alieni erroris societatem suscipere non possumus.——1. Even as all men that live under Roman domination fight for you, Emperors of the Earth and sovereigns, you in turn fight for almighty God and for the Holy Faith. Salvation could otherwise not be assured, if everyone did not earnestly worship the true God, that is, the God of the Christians, by Whom all things are ruled; He is indeed the one true God, who is worshipped within the deepest of one’s soul: “For the gods of the Gentiles are daemonic things [“daemonia” in the Latin]”, as the Scripture says [Ps. xcv. 5].2. It is for this reason that whoever fights for this true God and accepts the principle that He is to be worshipped with intimate participation, devotes himself not to dissimulation, not to connivance, but to the practice of faith and adoration. At the very least, if he doesn’t engage in this, he shall not give his consent to the worship of idols nor to the celebration of profane cults. For nobody escapes God, to Whom even the deepest of all hearts appears clearly.[…]6. Let nobody take advantage of your young age! If he is a Gentile who asks such things of you, he must not clutch your mind with the fetters of his own superstition, but he must rather teach you and exhort you by [the example of] his own dedication how strongly you should dedicate yourself to the practice of the True Faith, whenever he puts so much true effort into defending empty things. I too suggest you respect the achievements of great men, but God obviously must come before everyone else.7. If a matter of warfare were at hand, you would seek the advice of a man who has become expert by going through many battles, and then follow his suggestions; when it is a matter of religion, think of God! Nobody shall be offended if almighty God is put before him. Let the other man have his own mind on this.[…]14. What will you answer to the priest who tells you: “The Church doesn’t want your gifts, for you have adorned the Gentiles’ temples with your gifts. The Altar of Christ spits away your endowment, for you have built an altar to an image; for yours is the voice, yours is the hand and yours is the signature — yours is then the work. Lord Jesus rejects your respects and spits them back to you, for you have respected the idols; he did tell you: «You cannot serve two masters» [Matth. vi, 24]. The virgins consecrated to God won’t accept your sponsorship, while the virgins of Vesta expect it? Why do you seek the ministers of God for those requests you preferred to first hear from the profane Nations? We cannot burden ourselves with another’s errors.”Letter 18, on the other hand, is a more technical counterargument to Symmachus’ many specific points. Here are some ideological highlights:1. Cum vir clarissimus praefectus urbis Symmachus ad clementiam tuam retulisset, ut ara, quae de urbis Romae curia sublata fuerat, redderetur loco et tu, imperator, licet adhuc in minoris aevi tirocinio florentibus novus annis, fidei tamen virtute veteranus obsecrata gentilium non probares, eodem quo conperi puncto libellum obtuli. Quo licet conprehenderim, quae suggestioni necessaria viderentur, poposci tamen exemplum mihi relationis dari.2. Itaque non fidei tuae ambiguus, sed providus cautionis, et pii certus examinis, hoc sermone relationis adsertioni respondeo hoc unum petens, ut non verborum elegantiam, sed vim rerum exspectandam putes. […] Volve, quaeso, atque excute sectam gentilium! Pretiosa et grandia sonant, veri effeta defendunt. Deum loquuntur, simulacrum adorant.[…]4. In prima propositione, flebili Roma questu sermonis inlacrimat veteres, ut ait, cultus caerimoniarum requirens. Haec sacra, inquit, Hannibalem a moenibus, a Capitolio Senonas repulerunt. Itaque dum sacrorum potentia praedicatur, infirmitas proditur. Ergo Hannibal diu sacris insultavit Romanis et diis contra se dimicantibus usque ad muros urbis vincendo pervenit. Cur se obsideri passi sunt, pro quibus deorum suorum arma pugnabant?5. Nam de Senonibus quid loquar, quos Capitolii secreta penetrantes Romanae reliquiae non tulissent, nisi eos pavido anser strepitu prodidisset? En quales templa Romana praesules habent! Ubi tunc erat Iuppiter? An in ansere loquebatur?6. Verum quid negem sacrorum ritus militasse Romanis? Sed etiam Hannibal eosdem deos colebat. Utrum volunt igitur? Eligant. Si in Romanis vicerunt sacra, in Carthaginiensibus ergo superata sunt; si in Carthaginiensibus triumphata, nec Romanis utique profuerunt.7. […] Venite et discite in terris caelestem militiam. Hic vivimus et illic militamus. Caeli mysterium doceat me deus ipse, qui condidit, non homo, qui se ipsum ignoravit. Cui magis de deo quam deo credam? Quomodo possum vobis credere, qui fatemini vos ignorare quod colitis?8. Uno, inquit, itinere non potest perveniri ad tam grande secretum. Quod vos ignoratis, id nos dei voce cognovimus. Et quod vos suspicionibus quaeritis, nos ex ipsa sapientia dei et veritate conpertum habemus. Non congruunt igitur vestra nobiscum. Vos pacem diis vestris ab imperatoribus obsecratis, nos ipsis imperatoribus a Christo pacem rogamus. Vos manuum vestrarum adoratis opera, nos iniuriam ducimus omne, quod fieri potest, deum putari. Non vult se deus in lapidibus coli. Denique etiam ipsi philosophi vestri ista riserunt.9. Quodsi vos ideo Christum deum negatis, quia illum mortuum esse non creditis - nescitis enim, quod mors illa carnis fuerit, non divinitatis, quae fecit, ut credentium iam nemo moriatur - quid vobis inprudentius, qui contumeliose colitis et honorifice derogatis; vestrum enim deum lignum putatis. O contumeliosa reverentia! Christum mori potuisse non creditis. O honorifica pervicacia!—1. Since the esteemed Praefect of the City Symmachus has entrusted your clemency with a plea to restore the altar, which had once been removed from the roman Curia; and since you, Emperor, despite being in your young age and thus like a fresh soldier, are in fact like a veteran in your faith, you haven’t granted the Gentiles’ pleas. When I came to know of this, I sent you a document through which, in order to understand what suggestion you may need, I asked for a copy of the original request.2. Thus, not out of doubt in your faith, but with an eye to caution, and secure in your pious wisdom, I answer with these words what was asserted in the original request, with but one demand — that you look not at the elegance of my words, but rather at the strenght of my arguments. Look, I beg you, and observe with great care the Gentiles’ sect! They speak of precious and lofty things, but they defend nothingness. They speak of God, but they worship objects.[…]4. In the first argument, Rome makes a tearful speech, lamenting and requesting, as she says, the old cults’ ceremonies back. These rites, she says, have once warded off Hannibal from the walls, and the Senones from the Capitol. Yet, even as the might of these rites is extolled, their weakness appears. Because Hannibal long insulted the Roman rites and gods that were fighting against him, so long as he signNowed the walls, one victory after the other. Why did they suffer being besieged, if their gods were fighting for their side?5. Or should I speak of the Senones, who, having penetrated the holy Capitol, wouldn’t have been repulsed, hadn’t a fearful goose betrayed them with its cackling? Here, what guardians do Roman temples have! And where was Jupiter then? Or was he speaking through that goose?6. Indeed, why should I deny that those holy rites were aiding the Romans? But Hannibal too was worshipping the same gods! Which is it, then? Let them pick one. If those rites won the day for the Romans, then the Carthaginian ones have been useless; if they led to the Carthaginians’ triumphs, then they hadn’t been of much use to the Romans.7. […] Come and discover that, here on Earth, there is a divine army. Here we live and here we fight. Let the Heavens’ secrets be taught to me by God Himslef, who created them, not by man, who doesn’t even know himself. Who is more authoritative about God that God? How can I believe you, who admit to ignoring what you worship?8. “One path alone”, he says, “cannot lead to the bottom of such a great mystery.” What you ignore, we have learnt from God’s own voice. And what you seek through hypotheses, we know that in detail through God’s own wisdom and through Truth. Your views, then, do not align with ours. You beg from the Emperor peace for your gods, ourselves we beg from Christ peace for our Emperors. You worship the fruit of your hands, we consider it offensive to deem a god whatever can be made into one. God doesn’t want to be worshipped in stones. After all, your own philosophers have laughed at such things.9. If you can similarly bring yourselves to deny that Christ is God, since you cannot believe that he may have died — for you ignore that that was the death of the flesh, not the Godliness’, undergone so that no believer may ever die again — what is less wise than yourselves, who worship him offensively, and insult Him by your adoration? You believe your god to be a piece of wood! What offensive worship! You cannot believe that Christ may have died. What an elegant wickedness!I’m keeping from quoting more for the sake of readability, but the three documents and the two sides’ arguments are fascinating to say the least. As a last curiosity, elsewhere (ep. 18:10) Ambrose asks polemically: “But, he says, the old altars must be given back to the idols, and the ornaments to the temples. Let them ask this of someone their fellow in superstition: the Christian Emperor has learnt to honor the Christ’s altar only. Why do they try to have pious hands and faithful eyes lend themselves to their sacrilege? Let our Emperor’s voice sing the praises of the Christ and speak of Him only, for he feels His truth, «as the heart of the King is held in God’s hand» [Prov. xxi, 1]. What Gentile Emperor ever raised an Altar to the Christ anyway?”Severus Alexander (r. 222–235), cousin and successor of the infamous Elagabalus, seems to have counted, among his guardian Lares, not just his imperial predecessors and his ancestors, but also “enlightened souls” such as Apollonius of Tyana, Orpheus, Abraham and Jesus Christ.But that had been the case in times long gone and never to return.Statues were at the center of many acts of violence throughout the Empire, as were in Germanic lands the irminsûl (pillars), sacred trees and groves (true to Exodus 34:13: “But ye shall destroy their altars, break their images, and cut down their groves”) and their Pagan worshippers were taunted as if they believed the object itself to house the deity — which thus became worth deriding as mere, dumb “pieces of wood” (you can see one such scene from the film Agora (2009), among other artistic depictions) — whereas they were in fact seen as tangible aid to memory, which was the one and only source of “religious authority” throughout all Indo-European Paganism: whether in the shape of the oldest Pagan cults — the ancestors’ tracks, faces, gestures and belongings — or in the shape of Muses (Mousa < *montja: “she who remembers [smth. to s.o.]” < PIE *men: “thought”; they were also known to be the daughters of Mnemosyne, “memory”) inspiring the Poets who would then teach religion to other men, poets such as Hesiod, Orpheus and many others. At one point, when the poets’ task was taken up by philosophy — as Nietzsche cannily noticed — the latter weakened this worldview by abstracting and rationalizing it beyond the interpretive means and knowledge of the day.“Even outside of the parameters of our current sensitivities, it is indisputable that triumphant Christianity displayed an extreme intolerance towards traditional cults […]. Faced with a doctrine manifesting itself under a totalitarian shape, then, the Pagans had no easy task on their hands, but we must on the other hand acknowledge that they resorted to arguments that, to a Christian audience, would have sounded highly unconvincing. […] They were themselves as rigid in their positions as their adversaries were. The debate between Christians and Pagans witnessed the confrontation between two statements that were by their own nature absolute.”— F. Paschoud, Christian intolerance as seen and judged by Pagans[5]I would counter the bolded part of this excerpt by a scholar our contemporary by reminding the patient reader of the Appendix on Newspeak I quoted above: rather than being rigid or even outspoken (as only a handful of authors seem to have been — Celsus, Julian, Zosimus — and certainly nowhere near the intensity normal among their Abrahamic opponents), the Pagans lacked the very ideological infrastructure to even conceive the mental framework their opponents wandered through with “exact and often very subtle” scrupulousness, and if they may seem insightful to us, modern readers, it is only insofar they supply ideas very difficult for ourselves to produce: in this case, the Christian “Newspeak” limited the outsiders’ capacity to understand orthodoxy even more than it did the insiders’ ability to speak heresy, and the historical impact Abrahamism would have on culture was too huge to be foreseeable to either side — we too have slowly started picturing it around the Enlightenment, after all. Moreover, Paganism certainly was “absolute” — a religion that isn’t would be a strange sight — but not at all militantly absolute, nor in any way an oecumenical (“for the whole inhabited world”), catholic (“towards the whole [world]”), orthodox (“right opinion”) tradition: traditional Paganism left alone those who wanted no part of it, and I agree with Jan Assman’s relabeling the old terms “Monotheistic” and “Polytheistic” as “Exclusionary” and “Inclusionary” forms of religiosity.Saint George topples the Pagan idols; Dečani, 14th Century. Images of these frescoes come from here: a (by no means complete) list of Christian Saints who destroyed religious imagesLeft, a Christian Saint destroying a Pagan statue; Right, in an ironic turn of events that came about half a millennium after the scope of this answer, the Christian Iconoclasts took to destroying Christian religious images: depicted in the (possibly clandestine, at the time it was produced) Chludov Psalter, chief Iconoclast John the Grammarian’s face happens to have rubbed out. This is how the Iconoclasts’ churches ended up looking, in 9th Century Costantinople.[6] By then, Charlemagne had also sanguinarily managed to evangelize modern Germany, mostly through mass decapitations.[7][8]The political attempt at defending traditional religion in the Empire ended with the sudden death of traditionalistic Emperor Julian (the so-called “Apostate”, r. 361–363 AD) and the highly emblematic Battle of the Frigidus in 394 AD, which got the aptly-named Pagan usurper Eugenius off the scene; but the Lupercalia were celebrated in Central Italy until as late as the 5th Century, when Pope Gelasius I finally abolished them and possibly had them replaced with the celebration of the Purification of the Virgin Mary; and it is well known that the very slow penetration of Christianity into the countryside (“pagan”, after all, means “village-dweller”, as the Germanic “heathen” means “heath-dweller”) was had at the cost of a thorough syncretism with some elements of the local traditional cults.Meanwhile, on the military/administrative side, the Aurelian Walls were built in 271–275 AD, as Rome had vastly outgrown the existing Servian Walls (built six centuries before) many centuries before anybody even thought of building the newer ones — that Aurelian did so upon putting an end to half a century of anarchy hints to just how precarious the very heart of Empire had come to be perceived as. Rome ceased to be the Capital ten years later, Christianity would be depenalized another thirty years later, and finally made the sole religion another half century later, in 380 AD.Around the time these new walls were built, Rome was already down to 350 000 inhabitants from the estimated 1 or 2 mln (top estimate 3.5 mln)[9]that used to call her home; Alexandria had 216 000; six coastal cities were between 90 and 50 thousand inhabitants, the rest were all below 40 000. Rome herself would end up with a few thousand inhabitants by the end of the 5th Century.The Visigothic Sack of Rome — 410 AD: Christian reactions.Having laid the backdrop clear in its complexity, let’s get down to military/political upheavals and their written record, and let’s start with those contemporary writers that were, to all intents and purposes, the Culture of the day: the Christians.Jerome (347-420), a devout Christian, Father of the Church, quite open to dialogue but struggling with his identity (he famously dreamt of a voice accusing him: “You’re no Christian, you are a Ciceronean!”[10]) as well as a patron of sorts to translators, given his extensive, high-quality theorical and practical work on the only translation of the Bible the Latin West would use for a full millennium, was following a trend quite popular in his day and living as a hermit in Palestine when news of the 410 AD sack of Rome — no longer the capital since 286 — signNowed him. Alaric’s siege had started already in 408 AD, and in 409 Jerome had written to a widow by the name of Ageruchia:123.16–17 [16.] Verum quid ago? Fracta navi de mercibus disputo. Qui tenebat, de medio fit, et non intelligimus Antichristum appropinquare, quem Dominus Jesus Christus interficiet spiritu oris sui. “Vae praegnantibus, et nutrientibus in illa die”; quorum utrumque de fructibus nuptiarum est. Praesentium miseriarum pauca percurram. Quod rari hucusque residemus, non nostri meriti, sed Domini misericordiae est. Innumerabiles et ferocissimae nationes universas Gallias occuparunt. Quidquid inter Alpes et Pyrenaeum est, quod Oceano et Rheno includitur, Quadus, Wandalus, Sarmata, Halani, Gipedes, Heruli, Saxones, Burgundiones, Alemani, et, o lugenda respublica! hostes Pannonii vastarunt. “Etenim Assur venit cum illis”. Moguntiacum, nobilis quondam civitas, capta atque subversa est, et in Ecclesia multa hominum millia trucidata. Vangiones longa obsidione deleti. Remorum urbs praepotens, Ambiani, Attrebatae, extremique hominum Morini, Tornacus, Nemetae, Argentoratus, translatae in Germaniam. Aquitaniae, Novemque populorum, Lugdunensis, et Narbonensis provinciae, praeter paucas urbes populata sunt cuncta. Quas et ipsas foris gladius, intus vastat fames. Non possum absque lacrymis Tolosae facere mentionem, quae ut hucusque non rueret, sancti Episcopi Exuperii merita praestiterunt. Ipsae Hispaniae jam jamque periturae, quotidie contremiscunt, recordantes irruptionis Cimbricae, et quidquid alii semel passi sunt, illae semper timore patiuntur.17. Caetera taceo, ne videar de Dei desperare clementia. Olim a mari Pontico usque ad Alpes Julias, non erant nostra, quae nostra sunt. Et per annos triginta fracto Danubii limite, in mediis Romani imperii regionibus pugnabatur. Aruerunt vetustate lacrymae. Praeter paucos senes, omnes in captivitate et obsidione generati, non desiderabant, quam non noverant libertatem. Quis hoc credet? quae digno sermone historiae comprehendent? Romam in gremio suo, non pro gloria, sed pro salute pugnare? imo ne pugnare quidem, sed auro et cuncta supellectile vitam redimere? Quod non vitio Principum, qui vel religiosissimi sunt, sed scelere semibarbari accidit proditoris, qui nostris contra nos opibus armavit inimicos.[…]Hannibal, de Hispaniae finibus orta tempestas, cum vastasset Italiam, vidit urbem, nec ausus est obsidere. Pyrrhum tanta tenuit Romani nominis reverentia, ut deletis omnibus, e propinquo recederet loco: nec audebat victor aspicere, quam regum didicerat civitatem. […] et utriusque provinciae populi Romani vectigales sunt. Nunc ut omnia prospero fine eveniant, praeter nostra quae amisimus, non habemus quod victis hostibus auferamus. Potentiam Romanae urbis, ardens Poeta describens, ait: “Quid satis est, si Roma parum est?”Quod nos alio mutemus elogio: “Quid salvum est, si Roma perit?”“Non mihi si linguae centum sint, oraque centum,Ferrea vox, omnes captorum dicere poenas,Omnia caesorum percurrere nomina possim.”—*—
-
What culture shocks can a South Indian face in North India?
I am a South Indian doctor in Delhi…and sometimes I get these weird questions that surprise me.I was once inserting a cannula into a patient’s vein and at that moment of pain the patient asked me.. ‘you are not from Delhi are you?’ I told her I am from Chennai.. she asked me ‘are you married? What does sahib do?’ I was a little taken aback and asked her why she thought I was married.. ‘coz you are wearing a bindi’ she replied…I smiled at her.. thought she was ignorant and told her I am single…. A few days later one of my consultants asked me ‘you are from the south right..wearing a bindi must be compulsory there’. My reply ‘no mam it isn't compulsory.. we wear it if we like to.’…. And when someone asked me ‘what is the significance of wearing a bindi?’ all I could reply was ‘I am not exactly sure but one thing I can tell you is it doesn't mean I am married :P’ while everyone from a toddler to a octagenerian wears a bindi in the south and not wearing it makes us feel a little weird, the fact that it labels you as being married in the north is something that makes me go ‘enna kodumai sir idu’.When I came to Delhi I was wearing a chain, earrings and finger rings of gold.. one thing that I was advised ‘remove your jewellery else someone will snatch it and remove it for you’ I am not saying such crimes don't happen in the south.. but spotting women who actually wear gold chains is a rarity.. in comparison to the mota mota jewellery that we wear.How can you people live on rice??? When northies live on a staple diet of rotis and aaloo ki sabzi or paneer.. I like rice, you like rotis..so what?This probably doesn't apply to all north Indians but 4–5 people have also asked me this..They:so you are from chennai huh? You speak malayalam right.Me: no I am Tamil.. heard of ‘Tamil’Nadu??They: so it is different from kannad and Telugu also??Me: yes yes totallyThey: oh you are from Jayalalitha’s place?? Jallikattu?? Marina beach? Rajnikanth?Me: thank god yes you finally got it… marina beach is our pride and you can always find Jayalalitha there :PThe dressing and make up that people do here is pretty much diverse from the south.. not that I am judging or anything. That's just you, this is just me.. as long as you don't judge me for not being like you, it's fine… but how often do you see a woman with labour pains walk into the labour room in a government hospital with make up at 3.30AM in the south? Never… and it is a common sight here. And I thought it happened only in Hindi serials :PPS. The above mentioned facts are based on personal experiences and not any generalized comments on north Indians. One more thing that also shocks me is the amiability of the people in the north. They can talk to anyone at anytime without any hesitation and make them feel warm. Kudos to that! :)
-
What are some great online tools for college students? Closer to $0 the better.
Below are the list of tools , i use on a regular basis. 1st tool under each segment is my favorite and the rest are open for you to use. Online Courses : Coursera UdacityUdemy edX.orgFree Online Courses & Online Learning from ALISON AllversityKhan AcademyOpen2StudySkillshareMIT OpenCourseMOOC-List.comLearn to code and help nonprofits IT Training from KnowledgeNet Conferences : TED.comGoogle TalksSolve for xDO lectures Fora.TV99% U RSA AnimateCapture Your Flag Learn new languages : DuolingoAnkiBBC LanguagesDothraki ( Game of Thrones) Presentation Tools : PreziAnimotoGlogsterSlideSharePowtoonCollaboration Tools : GlipGoPlan AsanaBlossomTeamGanttTrelloProductivity : EvernoteGoogle Keep Assistant.ToForestTimeful Pdf Search Engine - Search for PDF files Zoho - (Online tools for collaboration and productivity)Pocket (Save articles for reading later)Xmarks - Bookmark Sync and SearchDiigo - Better reading and research with annotation, highlighter, sticky notes, archiving, bookmarking & more. Chrome Extensions : BeLimitlessStayFocused Time TrackerHobbies : JustinGuitar.comBasics of Photography: The Complete Guide http://www.chesscademy.com/ Ultimate Directory for Finding and Learning New Hobbies!! Online Poker Strategy School www.scribd.com Glassdoor – Get Hired. Love Your Job.
Trusted esignature solution— what our customers are saying
Get legally-binding signatures now!
Related searches to Request eSignature Word Free
Frequently asked questions
How do i add an electronic signature to a word document?
How to esign a filable pdf file?
What is the electronic signature in trim you spray?
Get more for Request eSignature Word Free
- How Can I Electronic signature New Jersey Plumbing Presentation
- How Can I Electronic signature New Jersey Plumbing Presentation
- Can I Electronic signature New Jersey Plumbing Presentation
- Can I Electronic signature New Jersey Plumbing PPT
- Can I Electronic signature New Jersey Plumbing Presentation
- How To Electronic signature New Jersey Plumbing Presentation
- How Do I Electronic signature New Jersey Plumbing Presentation
- Help Me With Electronic signature New Jersey Plumbing Presentation
Find out other Request eSignature Word Free
- Physical education lesson plan form
- Scout accident form
- Tenant undertaking letter form
- Chili cook off registration form collegedale community church
- Nj 927 form sample
- Coordination report form
- Y2k read theory answers form
- Meof ii minimal eating observation form version ii assess how he
- Latihan matematik prasekolah 6 tahun pdf form
- Amrican form
- Urdhr blerje pr lirim nga tvsh atk ksorg form
- Use one application per property location form
- Mage the awakening character sheet form
- Std 12 secretarial practice maharashtra board secretarial practice targetpublications form
- Exposure prone declaration form griffith
- Purchase requisition form microsoft word
- Boeing d 590 form
- Should npr run funding credits from the department of homeland form
- Virus and bacteria worksheet pdf answer key 249309868 form
- Measurement disclaimer form