How Do I eSign Georgia Doctors Document

When a client enters information (such as a password) into the online form on , the information is encrypted so the client cannot see it. An authorized representative for the client, called a "Doe Representative," must enter the information into the "Signature" field to complete the signature.

[11:17] <hmm9002> i think my doc is the right way to go [11:17] <@shecalledmepaul_> i want to learn how to make a doc that uses some python [11:17] <@shecalledmepaul_> its the easiest way [11:17] <hmm9002> and i want someone to help me [11:17] <@shecalledmepaul_> and i know someone that will [11:17] <@shecalledmepaul_> he just needs my help to [11:17] <_Err404> you are not in the doc [11:18] <_Err404> you do not have the required permission [11:18] <hmm9002> ok fine [11:18] <jason_steakums> I've been using Python for 10 years, and I use it for all of the client code, so I have the permissions, but it doesn't have the ability to generate documetns. And I'm willing to pay for that to be an option. [11:18] <jason_steakums> And I am the only one who needs it. [11:19] <hmm9002> ok [11:20] <@emmaw> what kind of python does he use? [11:20] <fastantic4> python , but I've been working with 3 [11:20] <jason_steakums> I've tried it all, but the code base is a disaster, to put it mildly [11:20] <centralpole> is he working on the new version? [11:20] <@emmaw> i don't think he wants to use a new version of c/c++ [11:20] <centralpole> because i think the new codebase does look really good [11:20] <@emmaw> and he's very close [11:20] <@emmaw> to being done [11:21] <fastantic4> it is the same code base as before, it's just been refactored [11:21] <centralpole> hmm i'll check that out [11:21] <hmm9002> ok [11:21] <fastantic4> yeah. but it's a good idea to have it done [11:21] <

I don't think this is a problem with the eSignature. It is more of a problem with the eSignature that was implemented into the software for the Bitcoin block chain. So if the software was designed to recognize that there was no difference between a written contract and a digital document with a eSignature attached, and that the eSignature was to be ignored, there is no reason that the software would treat the two as equivalent and should not create the eSignature as part of the signed document, because then you are creating a document that is different from the original documents signed. If the eSignature is created by the software, then it should be treated the same way that any other form of digital signature and it should be ignored or ignored by the software, as it would be for any other signed document. If the software would accept the digital signature as valid by default, then it would not really need a separate "validation process." I believe that there is a simple way to do that: create a separate program that only accepts digital signatures in digital signatures. I believe that this is the only possible way to make the Bitcoin block chain compatible with a modern electronic contract system. It has no problems with the eSignatures, but it has problems with the signatures in the electronic transaction records and with the transaction records themselves in terms of both the validity and the timeliness of transaction records. The eSignature and eSignature transa...