Fax Byline Proof with airSlate SignNow

State byline order

[Music] good evening and welcome back to buy line we took a short break it's very hot here this summer isn't it and but we're back with us a couple of original tapings today and our first guest is going to be mindy dom and as you probably remember this is amorous media and this show is called by line and it's co-sponsored by the amorous League of Women Voters and it's focused around helping us all keep track of what's going on on Beacon Hill and a Town Hall locally as we're forming our new government or Tom charters being implemented and at the state level we have brand new state representative mindy dom who lives right here in town and joe Comerford is our new senator from northampton so we have a lot to talk about today you were on a few months ago and you were projecting forward about things around the budget and some of the legislation you were working on so let's let's just dive right in with the budget because of course that's the single biggest product that the legislature has to produce every year and our fiscal year begins on July 1 ends night before June 30th and the governor recently signed it and you get to tell us now the good news and maybe a little bit of not so good news but hopefully mostly good this year it's one that the 3rd hampshire district where we are can embrace and it's one that mary mac valley loves the Berkshires loves southeast it's great when you have more money than you expect and when the governor agrees with your projects audio like that I think that's remarkable well you know we should explain to the viewers so there's a process that goes on much earlier in the year and it's about December of January the governor the house and the Senate agree on a revenue number and that's how much revenue the week we think we're going to take in in the new fiscal year and then you build your budget around that but that didn't happen this year because you tell me sir because there was more money than expected that's right and I think it evolves I think that number evolves so that the house when we start working with our budget the revenue number we're dealing with a lower number and even just a month later when the Senate gets it already there were projections that there's gonna be more revenue right my understanding is that's why the Senate can actually be more generous because it's using projected revenue theoretically of the governor in the House and the Senate are all supposed to use the same revenue name but then if you're clever you can find other ways of bumping up the revenue so you can actually spend a little more and this year in the conference committee they added some money they did and I think and was you know I think we were all waiting to see was the governor going to accept those revenue projections or was it going to veto some of the spending he didn't veto any single dollar nothing which is really shocking so you know people were concerned and I heard from constituents who said why does it take him so long for the budget come on come on and I kept saying well as long as I have my priorities are in that budget at the end I'm okay with them taking a long time to negotiate it but it turned out that the time they took resulted I think in a terrific budget and one that was veto proof I mean you know he didn't come back with anything so yeah and as a Republican and a fiscal conservative you would expect him to veto as he has every one of his previous budgets he's vetoed hundreds of millions of dollars in the legislature has done hundreds of overrides and most of his overrides the Democrats and Republicans both overall yet the governor why because they put a balanced budget on his desk and he wanted to cut why do you do that so today I mean this year he he went the other direction the other direction and I think what's also interesting is my finger was ready to override because I was told when the overrides happen they have to go fast yeah but he did not veto any spending but he did apparently veto some language but I have not seen although the examples and I think we're gonna deal with that as a legislature in September and you might have sent back a few amendments as well of some of that lang so some of those you might be able to work out with him instead of doing an override so and some of them we accepted on Wednesday so so tell us what were the highlights from your point of view given your district and from your point of view with regard to the statewide interest so I had two priorities for the district that I think also impact the Commonwealth but they were for the district one was UMass Amherst and the other was regional transit authorities so UMass Amherst you may remember the house came out with a budget that provided some funding to UMass as a system that would have not only paid for a collective bargaining agreements which I think has not been done for the past couple years as well some additional money the Senate came out with a budget that's called for an unfunded tuition freeze and I put that in quotes because an unfunded tuition freeze in my mind it was a program cut because somebody has to pay for it and so if you give you mass and a requirement saying you can't raise tuition and we're not giving you any more money they have to find the money and were they barring raise increase in fees or just tuition I the Senate's version was tuition only - yes and it would have cost about 10 point 1 million dollars to actually pay for that freeze I put in a moment for that which was rejected by the house but that was a big concern because that was very - very different budget lines for UMass and I like to think that as I said as long as it took them to negotiate the conference the result was very good because you must did not get the so-called codified tuition freeze this would have been requiring them not suggesting instead there's some kind of reporting language yes but the reporting is around accountability which as a state-funded agency they would be subject to anyway I don't think it was anything different I'm glad they did that here because if that satisfies the folks that wanted to do the unfunded tuition freeze that's terrific but I'm really thrilled that UMass Amherst will not suffer any student service cuts program cuts unemployment layoffs I mean that's how it would have looked you know that we would have seen student programs that are on a trajectory like this having to be truncated we would have seen people need to be laid off that was not something I wanted so I fought hard for that I'm you know I joined a lot of voices in the house around that and the House leadership wanted to make sure that you mass and UMass Amherst was protected so I'm thrilled with that and regional transit authorities they had requested about 90 point 1 million dollars to sustain services but it looked like in my dip to about 86 87 and that would have affected PVTA so right the conference committee came out with it at the fully funded which is the ninety plus million dollars which doesn't mean expanded service it means level service but nothing gets caught I think it's kind of now unless they decide this particular route isn't productive and it's better than real emanate this Rupe and take those dollars and put it to this other route exact which is more productive exactly but if they don't have to make that decision based on money you want to make it based on how exactly okay and so and that's actually better because at least if we sustained it then we can build on that to expand it we obviously need more public transit throughout the state and including in western Massachusetts so now this was before your time in the legislature but there was a multi-year agreement to increase funding to regional transit authorities by many millions of dollars over about a five year period I'm pretty sure this is the last installment and so now the the challenge is to figure out how to get another multi-year increase and given all the discussion and the debate in the conversation in Boston now about increasing transportation and how are we going to pay for it this this gives the regional transit authorities and the caucus I assume the caucus is still active in the building and so it gives them the opportunity to think about what another multi-year plan would look like and how to make sure that not all the money goes to the T well or use the concern about the T in my mind to highlight the statewide crisis in public transit right and right now every day in Boston we hear about either train is literally falling off the track catching on fire you know stuck somewhere and not moving I mean there are just everyday there's like a crisis in that system coupled with the reps and the Senators themselves facing like to our commutes in something that should take a 30-minute commute when they're driving and it takes some of them as long to get to Boston as it does for me yeah I mean that's ridiculous and they're in 20 miles away wait and they're like you know if I leave at 6:00 at night I'm home in like a half hour in the morning it takes me closer to two and I actually think those experiences are very valuable to people who rely on Regional Transit because it's in our experience now they're having it too and I think it opens up the conversation to the crisis in public transit coupled with our concern around climate and trying to get you know people to go into trains into buses into car pools I think we're at a great moment we you know as a legislature we've also passed the fair share amendment twice mm-hmm which would put a fee a four percent fee on incomes of over a million dollars specifically to go to pay for things like education and transportation it's not going to be enough we know it's not going to be enough so I think we're building momentum for you know recognizing we're in a public transit crisis and that's how I'm framing it so when I hear my colleagues talk about the MBTA I trade their MBTA for one RT we do know because the whole Western Massachusetts delegation from the Berkshires all the way to let's say Worcester or so are they all united on a regional vision for transportation and therefore organize to basically speak with one voice and I think push to make sure that for example in southeastern mass they're looking for the next installment they got a billion dollars for their south coast rail but they need at least another billion and the people up in the Boston area are trying to get trains to Lin right etc etc well what about us I also think it's not about us it's also going to them insane hear us to write like an end not but because I think that's what I mean it's like a statewide issue now they are actually experiencing but we've always experienced some public transit that's what we have to let them know now you're in our shoes right and I think that I actually think passenger rail may be the issue in the West part of the state that we can were all sort of congregating around and consolidating support around and that allows us to speak with one voice around public transit whether it's rail buses etc so I'm optimistic great yeah well I saw the governor's transportation plan he had put a commission together and he they published a plan and it's very robust it could be a little more robust but it's a very robust plan but a very big unanswered question is how we're gonna pay it where he left that for another day and that's because he doesn't want to talk about taxes and so that means that the members of the legislature have to put on their big boy pants and slacks and a big girl I was trying to get the slats in so big boy pants and big girl slacks and work on the taxation question because you there's no free lunch absolutely we're never going to get it if we're not prepared to pay for you know that's been my thing I'm not afraid to I mean we have a lot of expenses and in the third Hampshire district I hear about those expenses people like we need education we need transportation somebody's got to pay for it it should be us right it's a public that has to be us I we also have to push Washington to do their job because the majority of all of the gas tax is collected in the country go to the federal government and then they get redistributed to the states so but they haven't raised those in decades as we hadn't for decades until what five years ago six years ago and we got a nickel well I'm sort of I'm exploring in conversation with people because gas tax is something that's being talked about and in western Massachusetts that sort of makes people sad because it's a regressive tax it disproportionately affects people in rural areas because we drive more my so it's sort of a vicious cycle but I'm trying to think of it more as what we need to talk about in Boston is a carbon fee and we need to talk about it as starting with vehicles so carbon fee and when you think about what is the practice of both the gas tax and a carbon fee someone goes with with the car you go to the gas station you fill up your tank with gas if it's a gas tax you're a couple cents to 15 cents more gallon you're paying for it and that money goes into the general fund or it goes to transportation to the highway fund I'm in a carbon fee if you're going to be doing that you go to put gas in your car it's more money per gallon and that money goes specifically to transportation projects that reduce greenhouse gases part of it part of it comes back to the consumer mm-hmm and in western Massachusetts so though there isn't really a taste for a gas tax there is in the third hampshire strong support car I've been thinking yeah and I'm not sure what the difference really is if the funds are going into these projects and there's a benefit to the individual consumer so I'm trying to think I'm trying to raise this with folks in the house as have we thought about that this may be a good time to think about a carbon fee but we don't want to call it a carbon fee okay let's call it a transportation vehicle greenhouse gas fee but the process of acquiring it seems to be the same as a gas tax except it's a little bit more targeted to the climate emergency and I think that probably be a good thing so that's why I'm strengthened it has a secondary benefit because it depresses the demand that's right because of the price price point if it is the price point goes up other things look more attractive right and so therefore it drives you in the direction of reducing the amount of carbon emitted etc exactly it's like what we do with cigarettes right we raise the tax so that so what else don't you and another variation on that is the Reggie yes so Reggie for those who at home don't know what that is it's basically a fee that is attached at the wholesale level to the price of the inputs for creation of electricity and for large carbon producing energy systems and then that money is redistributed back into alternative energy and other ways in which to reduce the amount of carbon that goes into the atmosphere carbon fee tax whatever you want to call it / Reggie is a great strategy for helping the consumers help us with our public transportation and help us with climate and I think now there the Reggie from what I understand is also a multi-state compact it's multi-state right so the last states to do something and not wait for the federal government and yeah right now that's really important yeah because carbon doesn't stay within your boundaries and I think that they're doing a Reggie now they're also developing one that may be specific around transportation highways so the governor to his credit signed on to this about eight months ago and within the next couple of years hopefully there'll be a plan around transportation Reggie so you know my thinking is it's not just a name change going from gas tax to a carbon fee but it actually sort of looks at what is the impact on the consumer of both but how can you maximize the benefit of it and also how can it benefit Western mass right because if you're saying that some of that money is going to go into projects that are going to reduce greenhouse gases and transportation that could mean more public buses and that gives people more options when they don't get out of the car and yeah absolutely it's a cycle that can work for us yeah and it's a values based system which is different than the than the values upon which our current system is exactly and so if you really believe in this kind of decentralization and public transportation and you want to move in that direction you have to shift the paradigm this helps you see and I think there may be a support like the governor has a bill he has this climate readiness preparation program that basically he wants funded by a luxury real estate transaction fee that's like a fair share amendment for luxury housing right and there are a lot of communities in Massachusetts that want to have a transaction fee on real estate but they wanted to go to affordable housing but people aren't thinking about it that's it's like a carbon is he moving toward becoming an independent or something no or maybe I mean those are very progressive policies what's he doing I don't know I think it's really interesting that he's thinking about the transaction fee and climate change because he's saying I agree with these fees on luxury Blanc I mean to his credit he's opening his mind and looking at other other options so that's fantastic so let's go back to the budget that was great conversation but we need to know more about the budget we've had some local priorities that you so I was able to get I'm a couple of what they call earmarks that's special sort of line items for a couple of local places so we were able to get $25,000 for the Musante Health Center for some access programming I was able to get $25,000 in for the Amherst Pelham Northampton CCE program which is a project that the three towns are joining together to not only kind of aggregate their energy use to reduce the costs but to do it with a climate emergency in mine and to reduce their greenhouse gases and Senator Comerford was able to get an additional $25,000 for that so we were able to gather a tag team and bring in 50,000 for that project which is great and like I said even though I wasn't able to get that paid for tuition freeze I'm looking at that UMass line as another victory because we we were able to beat off a severe cut at the University very good and so let's shift focus a little bit here some things passed in the last hours of the house activity before the once summer break something yeah so tell us what happened in the last couple of days but we did and then in the last week of the session we passed the budget that's 40 3.1 billion dollars and then two days later we passed a program that the speaker had said he wanted to do which was called Green Works which is the big pro ten year one bill that turns out to be 1.3 billion dollar program that would help municipalities do the kind of climate mergency work that they want to do but they can't afford to do when he does describing it to the Democratic caucus which is all the Democratic members of the House he said that he hears too many times from municipalities that they wish they could do X Y or Z that but they can't they're too busy making sure they're her employees at health care schools police so his idea was this should be a reserved for just municipalities and that passing it passed with some amendments that were quite strong actually so there's all sorts of funding and programs within that program ones that support an electrified fleet like vehicles another one that a Provo from Somerville submitted an amendment that got passed that's a great one that says the priority will go to the projects that reduce the most greenhouse gases so it's not just Geographic it's also who's reducing the most that passed last week I think that the Senate hasn't acted on yet but will and then we also they also brought forward a package of bills on children's health and well-being and that passed the House and that included things like health insurance for children who are in DCF custody as they age out so between 18 and 26 making sure that folks who are in DCF custody continue to get these health care unbelievably important right another one around directories of providers if you ever tried to reach your provider and they said well here's the directory for your insurance and every person you call they're no longer there or they no longer accept that insurance they have a closed panel so half the directory doesn't even really exist it's called a ghost directory and so there's a part in that bill to require a cleaning up of the ghost directories with the hope that that makes it a lot more accessible so you will really find people as opposed to sorry nobody's home right nobody's on or will be able to document the shortages which is what I think will happen Oh mr. man you know the process of cleaning up will show that it's not just people's experience it's basic - I mean I think both are real but it's important to provide both action it has other pieces to it around mental health access for kids to make sure that they have access to behavioral health programs and another part that I like a lot which is getting the health policy Commission to assess the needs of families who have kids with complex medical needs these are kids who may be on feeding tubes and wheelchairs and trying to figure out so what are all the needs these kids have and do we have those resources for those families and so great piece of legislation I mean it took a bunch like three or four bills maybe even more than that that had gone through the house pulled them together and made one package for the end of it and we were told like with Green Works that leadership's intention was that this would not be the last time we would be dealing with climate change this session or children's health and well-being so that's good news very good and you've been chasing some bills that you put into the into the mix I remember one from our last meeting on this show diapers yes how are we doing on the diapers well it's so I don't know when this show is going to tonight is it going to show today I'm not sure so there's a diaper but the people are watching it tonight and we're on oh that's fantastic so yes I have a bill decreed that with two other members of the legislature to create a diaper benefit program on all states because you can't use snap or WIC to buy diapers yeah we had a hearing it was a fantastic hearing I'm the executive director of the United Way of Hampshire County came to provide evidence as well as some other folks and I think the committee is pretty receptive but we'll see they haven't pulled on it yet so we don't know what's going on but right now in Hampshire County the United Way is doing a diaper drive so I think there's like 50 locations throughout the county and if someone wants to donate diapers that will eventually find their way to like the amur survival center in Northampton survival center East Hampton community center you donate to this drive they'll distribute them we did a drive in the house and in the Senate before the public hearing we did a one-month drive we had about ten collection boxes president spoke I had one and speaker DeLeo had one I'm not saying there was a competition there but maybe a healthy competition and at the end of it of course there are 160 reps and 40 senators well if you didn't then shame on you and I got a lot of them actually back to the Emmer survivors because people said we don't know what to do with them I said I know exactly what to do and it was really interesting because the experience of the members who had donated it's very similar to the experience that people in our community have their first thing that they said was they had no idea how expensive they were and that's a good thing you want people to walk away with when you're trying to do a drive for awareness right now I'm recalling also that you worked on a bill that had to do with binary choice licenses and government applications or so remind us what that's all of it so that bill is known as the gender x bill okay because it would provide for a non binary option on government forms and applications so that's driver licenses hopefully voter registration forms you know the revenue forms all applications even fishing licenses would offer an X for folks who don't identify as either male or female it passed the Senate I don't know if I was here the last time if it had passed the Senate I don't think so so senator Comerford is the Senate sponsor and she that thing took off and I think it was like 39 to one passed the Senate which is fantastic who was the one I had no problem hey if you're gonna go on the record is the one yeah the senator homicide and so it's in the house and I'm I've introduced that with Reb Marjorie Decker it's in a different committee than Center Comerford hers went through transportation we sort of really wanted ours to be in state administration because it's more than just driver's licenses and we wanted to include more than driver's license and we're hoping for a hearing in the fall great with one minute to go what are your predictions for the fall oh I think there's gonna be more hearings because they didn't get through well there's you know 5,000 plus bills for higher education I think we're going to see some legislation around sudden college closures and when we to do about those very important in our minds here in amorous because of Hampshire colleges situation which by the way is heading in a much much more positive direction thrilled that their revenge Riaan visioning and moving fork and Rosenthal did a spectacular job some of those key alums staff at the college the faculty everybody has been engaged so we'll see and I think they'll have a better idea they have a new president a better idea and within a couple months what that looks like projecting out but that experience sort of triggered an engaged senator coming free to myself to really focus on the issue of sudden college closures in a bigger way we're both on the higher ed committee so we had a hearing on it we brought the Commissioner out to discuss it and I expect we'll probably have some legislation because the governor submitted legislation which I think the Legislature's tweaking and modifying and making better well it's great to have you here today what a lot of reporting a lot of activities so thank you very much thanks for joining us this evening and if you missed part of this we're on again on Monday night so tune in then thank thank you again and we'll see you all soon thank you very much [Music] [Music]