Integrate Countersignature Proof with airSlate SignNow

Integrate countersignature proof

here we have some clay it's the claim that if I take a pair of integers an A and a B then the a squared is bigger than the B squared forces the a being bigger than the B now when I first see this I don't know whether this particular claim is true or false let me just do a little bit of playing around and see if anything sort of reveals itself to me so I think I'm going to begin by just writing down my assumption in other words I'm starting with this a squared and I'm claiming that the a square is going to be bigger than the B squared now what I want is that a is bigger than B and I'm at squared so if I don't want to go just down to the a well maybe I could take a square root so that's one thing I could do I can consider taking the square root of this and comparing it to the square root of that however whenever we're doing square roots we should have a little bit of an alarm bell going off in our head because square roots have plus or minus is in front of them in other words I should have a plus or minus here or a plus or minus here and then this fact is going to not necessarily work out cleanly as a going to be because it depends on the pluses and the minuses I know that if I've got minus signs that I multiply both sides by a minus sign that those are going to flip this inequality so I don't have this like nice clean way to use this and to go down to this result but I think that this is going to actually inform me as to why I think this theorem is false because what we sort of seen in our playing around is there's there's some issue with pluses and minuses so why don't I do an example kind of like that why don't I take an example where I got some pluses and minuses and see whether it's going to work out in that sense so I'm going to write down a couple specific examples of actual numbers here keeping in mind that the plus/minus issue might be relevant for instance if I don't have any minuses showing around and I look at say something like 4 squared is greater than 3 squared well in this case it is true that for is going to be greater than three so so that example is making it appear like my theorem is true but this example hides pluses and minuses so let's do a different example let's take minus four I'm going to square the minus four and then I'm going to compare that to three squared in other words what I'm doing is minus 4 squared is 16 and I'm saying 16 is going to be greater...